The N.Y. Times published a detailed analysis about the ACLU"s "Identity Crisis."
This attempt at a "Gotcha" moment backfired.
124 pages will take you from the onset of the pandemic through Tandom v. Newsom
Fortunately, the SBA backed down after FIRE intervened.
I commend the journals for this forward-thinking move, and encourage other law schools to establish journals for conservative, libertarian, textualist, originalist, and classical liberal scholarship.
Deans who go woke will alienate conservative donors. Deans who refuse to go woke will alienate progressive faculties and students.
I submitted a comment with Professors Volokh and Strossen.
For the past month, the Fifth Circuit has posted oral argument audio on YouTube.
This trend towards legal newspeak troubles me. Any language--past or present--that offends some must be canceled.
"Accordingly, were there no constitutional barrier, we would recommend, under the Principles of Federal Prosecution, that you decline to commence such a prosecution."
"Despite Chief Justice Marshall’s legacy as one of the nation’s most significant U.S. Supreme Court justices, the newly discovered research regarding his role as a slave trader, slave owner of hundreds of slaves, pro-slavery jurisprudence, and racist views render him a highly inappropriate namesake for the Law School.”
KBJ's confirmation hearing was surprisingly uneventful, and two SJC Republicans voted for her.
I added a 49" 32:9 Ultrawide HDR Display, and two 4K 32" Ergo Monitors.
The federal courts will lack jurisdiction over pre-enforcement suits against state officials.
Disaster declarations can only last 21 days, instead of 90. A simple majority of lawmakers can terminate a disaster declaration.
Gorsuch: "The dissent may prefer decisions within a particular 30-year window."
But in the process, she undermined the basis for Chief Justice Roberts's quixotic "long game."
Ramos v. Louisiana held that the 6th Amendment protects the right to a unanimous jury. And Edwards v. Vannoy held that right should not apply retroactively.
Know who wasn't on the OG list? Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.
Step 1: File notice of removal. Step 2: Appeal remand order. Step 3: Seek rehearing of affirmance of remand order. Step 4: Seek certiorari from denial of rehearing en banc. Step 5: Go back to state court three years after complaint was filed.
Justice Kagan's majority opinion in CIC Services v. IRS was only the second majority opinion to cite NFIB, after King v. Burwell. And do we have a preview of California v. Texas?
The Burger Court made up the "community caretaking exception" to the warrant requirement in Cady v. Dombrowski. Justice Thomas declined to extend that unoriginalist doctrine to the home.
"He did more than anyone since the Continental Army to enshrine dissent as an American tradition and a badge of honor, and showed that history would look positively on those who voice truth in the face of even a seemingly monolithic consensus — something today’s leaders can take to heart."
With the right petition, we could see recusals from Justices Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Jackson
Justice Breyer writes in new book that "measures to restructure the Court could undermine both the Court and the constitutional system of checks and balances that depends on it."
In cases concerning guns and abortion, the Court has restricted the questions presented, perhaps, to achieve moderation.
Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch would have allowed Ohio and 18 other states to intervene and defend Title X rule.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks