A discussion at the Heritage Foundation.
President Biden's decision to permit the congressional investigation of the 2020 election's aftermath will invariably affect the 2024 election.
Eleventh Circuit found that architectural design would not be understood as protected speech.
Guns, Abortion, and Affirmative Action in a single year. Why not?
The deadline is 2/25/21
"When faced with a conflict between text and precedent, we should maximize the former—and minimize the latter."
"The Supreme Court’s ruling in the abortion case, expected next June, will be a defining moment in the Right’s battle for the Constitution."
The court did not decide if all jury verdicts from that court are now subject to review.
United brings back pre-departure drinks, glassware, and ceramic plates.
Could the plumber have claimed "finders keepers"?
A compendium of my writings on the case.
In the Legal Tender Cases, the Supreme Court reversed itself after two new Justices were appointed who favored the validity of paper money.
Still no decision on the Texas fetal heartbeat case.
Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan had no difficulty overruling Baker v. Nelson, and millennia of tradition.
No, Lochner was not "about pure laissez faire."
Philip B. Heymann, who died this week, did not clerk for JMH I.
If she is so worried about the Court's politicization, she wouldn't expend so much effort to call her colleagues partisans.
Featuring unprecedented feats of jurisprudential strength.
Justice Sotomayor said "23 to 24 months," but she obviously meant "23 to 24 weeks." The error was understandable, but is it proper for the Supreme Court transcript to be corrected?
"On Wednesday, two current members of the Court channelled the logic of the Justices they clerked for."
Don't get cocky.
I did not expect Chief Justice Roberts to say that the viability line was dicta based on Justice Blackmun's papers.
What methodology should be used to determine if Roe was wrong?
The Justices who profess the greatest respect for democracy forget the Court is the least democratic branch.
No, Marbury did not say that "the Supreme Court is the last word on what the Constitution means."
The former Dean exercised her right to remain silent to ensure maximum space for negotiation at conference.
I ran the YouTube Feed through Otter.ai.
Fried and Meese offer very different conceptions of legal conservatism.
Her first question often gives away her bottom line.
Meese warns that "law students will be tempted, understandably so, to abandon this philosophy in favor of a purely results-oriented approach to judging."
Judges Kanne (CA7) and King (CA4) have started a new trend.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
