Don't act surprised when Thomas narrowly reads made-up Brennan decision from 1968 that itself reversed precedent.
Justices Sotomayor and Kagan cite Sir Matthew Hale.
Justice Gorsuch's conservative colleagues now ignore him in Indian cases.
Believe it or not, Justice Kennedy's final opinion toned down some of the "awkward language."
"ProPublica has leveled two charges against me. . . . Neither charge is valid."
Three decades later, the George H.W. Bush SCOTUS strategy finally has three votes.
The limiting principle presented in Lopez would likely not meet her threshold.
I'm holding my breath on his predictions in Allen and Brackeen.
Justice Gorsuch v. Justice Thomas in Brackeen.
Scalia was right: "The only thing that will 'confine' the Court's holding is its sense of what it can get away with."
Justices Gorsuch and Alito have diametrically opposite perspectives on Indian Tribes
Justice Thomas would place the burden on the government, and follow a presumption of liberty.
133 pages down to 30 pages.
Does the special counsel "seek to avoid distracting fights"?
"To be clear, we mean no disrespect to either of these fine academics but their views on this matter are idiosyncratic."
He coulda been a contender.
"Of particular interest are historical gun regulations applicable to intoxicated or impaired individuals."
He probably thinks the Court is about him.
Justice Scalia would be rolling over in his grave.
Or, Sweet Home Alabama.
"The Court declines to be the first in generations to force a literal reading of the Clause's text."
A thorough originalist analysis of the "so-called Spending Clause" that casts Thiboutout in doubt.
Pharma has a "choice": Negotiate with HHS or pay $10 million "tax" per day.
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10
