Justice Gorsuch likes the new oral argument format and he writes his own opinions.
The law would direct lower courts how to reject claims of presidential immunity, and strip SCOTUS of appellate review.
There is little here that can't be gleaned from the docket and the split opinions.
We learn very little new: Roberts made no efforts to appeal to the left, as he sought to reclaim his Court.
My speculation was just the tip.
Three proposals, that lack any specificity, will go nowhere, fast.
What stuff are the Court's middle three Justices made of?
Does Justice Kagan really want Chief Judge Kimberly Moore to give Justice Thomas the Pauline Newman treatment?
"He's become a very shrill old man. I used to really like him, and I used to believe all of his stuff about judicial minimalism was sincere. Now I see it as a political charade."
There are tensions between Jarkesy, CFPB, and Vidal.
In July 1989, UC Hastings Had A 81.4% Pass Rate.
"The Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has no reason to accommodate politically motivated efforts to convict Trump before the election or inauguration."
The Chief Justice wavers on many issues, but never in returning power to the federal judiciary.
Another Burger Court precedent is about to be “abandoned” or “overruled” like Roe, Lemon, Chevron, Abood, and Bakke.
"The only avenue for a permanent solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains the negotiation framework set out in the United Nations and bilateral agreements."
Another guest post from Professor Rob Natelson
The right to keep and bear arms remains a second-class right.
When I tell Israelis that American students think they are like South Africa, they are shocked.
The Special Counsel is squarely on notice that the question of whether Morrison’s holding should be preserved or overruled is at issue.
If you think American politics are corrosive, hold my falafel.
I don't get the random questions Justice Barrett raises, and I'm not sure why she didn't mention her reservations in Hansen..
Seth Barrett TIllman and I write about our experience in Judge Cannon's court, before the decision yesterday.
But she did smuggle in a dictum that echoes Harvard's 2005 amicus brief about expressive activity in the classroom.
Ambition does not check ambition. Erudition checks opposition.
I think it is clear that Justice Alito lost the majority, but the resulting schizophrenic opinions still do not cohere.
