The truth may be that the judges actually believe what they are writing. For the left, that truth is too hard to process, so they rely on the "auditioning" charge.
"The effect, if not purpose, of modern international law is to obstruct American conservative foreign policy."
"The leaders of the conservative think tank have abandoned its founding principles."
Under the clear statement rule, it likely will not.
Texas "may consider, in the future, returning to greater reliance on a multistate accrediting entity other than the ABA should a suitable entity become available."
The United States military is like a Denny's.
An issue left unresolved in Trump v. Illinois.
A Canadian judge held a 513-day trial, and ruled that the "indigenous Cowichan Nation holds 'Aboriginal title' over 800 acres of land."
Trump v. Illinois is Robertsian faux minimalism at its worst.
AG James had a 100% chance of drawing a Democratic appointee, and drew a judge that the Ninth Circuit had to repeatedly reverse.
The Court denied the SG's application in Margolin v. NAJI but sent a clear signal to the lower court of what not to do.
The Meese Center is basically empty now.
John Malcolm and senior scholars move from Heritage to America Advancing Freedom.
I sent this letter this evening to Dr. Kevin Roberts, President of the Heritage Foundation.
The practice is not consistent.
Justices Barrett and Kavanaugh are still chewing over Justice Gorsuch's questions from the tariffs case.
Continuing the debate over liquidation from Bruen to Slaughter.
But what does "conclusive and preclusive" actually mean?
Judge Brian Murphy will likely be reversed by SCOTUS a third time in the same case.
Casey attempted to save Roe by rewriting it, but that compromise ultimately collapsed in Dobbs. Morrison attempted to save Humphrey's Executor by rewriting it, but that compromise will (likely) collapse in Slaughter.
Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.
Make a donation today! No thanks
Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.
Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.
I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.
My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.
Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.
Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks