Professor Can Continue with First Amendment Claim Over Denial of Raise for Including Expurgated Slurs on Exam
The Seventh Circuit so held yesterday; the case also involved other controversial statements besides the expurgated slur.
The Seventh Circuit so held yesterday; the case also involved other controversial statements besides the expurgated slur.
Miami Beach Mayor Steven Meiner says "disseminating antisemitism" in a taxpayer-owned building is "unjust to the values of our city and residents and should not be tolerated."
At least not if the goal is keeping minors from viewing porn.
The 9th Circuit revived a First Amendment lawsuit by Lars Jensen, who says his community college punished him for complaining about dumbed-down courses.
Just eight colleges had official neutrality policies before the attack. By the end of 2024, it was almost 150.
The Ninth Circuit allows his First Amendment claim against his community college to go forward.
The message that public officials are required to follow the law, even if they disagree with it, does not seem to have gotten through.
Plus: Ukraine attacks Russia with drones, Newsom's revisionist history, and more...
It's both unjust and unconstitutional.
President Donald Trump has begun kicking immigrant “Hamas sympathizers” out of the U.S.
Several months ago, Reason interviewed Mahmoud Khalil at a protest encampment. Now he’s sitting in ICE detention.
A highly significant grant of certiorari for next term.
The law school's dean rejected the letter, arguing the First Amendment "guarantees that the government cannot direct what Georgetown and its faculty teach and how to teach it."
No? Then how can government refuse to hire Georgetown alumni, so long as Georgetown "teach[es] and promote[s] DEI"?
in prosecution for bomb hoax at church; but spray-painting "the stupid Jew" in the storage locker isn't relevant enough, and thus isn't admissible. (Both the painted items were in defendant's native Kurdish.)
The president campaigned on a promise to defend the First Amendment, but he's now attacking free speech through a variety of disreputable strategies.
Trump's nominee for NIH director once stirred major controversy for criticizing lockdowns, mask mandates, and school closures. Yesterday, Senate Democrats didn't even raise the issue.
If enacted, the order would weaken digital security for Apple users throughout the U.K.
Rose Docherty was arrested over her sign, which read: "Coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want."
A proposed bill in 2021 would have put the HHS secretary in charge of censoring COVID-19 contrarianism on social media.
Texas A&M's Board of Regents voted to ban drag shows on the grounds that they objectify women and violate state and federal policies against promoting "gender ideology."
That's the correct decision, though I don't think there should even have been a question about it.
largely because the compensatory damages were just $1.
The department insists its directive will not suppress First Amendment rights.
A federal magistrate judge flags the issue, though doesn't purport to resolve it.
Justice Thomas dissents from the Court's refusal to resolve a clear circuit split.
Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank provides a helpful summary, with a little help from me.
Carr advocates greater control over social media by federal regulators, despite a reputation for supporting free speech.
"[I]n seeking to hold Cooper Union liable for [students'] expression, [plaintiff] cannot help but say the quiet part loud: sweeping otherwise-protected political expression into the hostility analysis will create pressure on institutions 'to suppress speech to ensure compliance with Title VI,' causing 'regulated entities to adopt restrictive policies in an effort to avoid liability' for a hostile environment."
Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.
This modal will close in 10