Free Minds & Free Markets

Non-Interventionist Republicans like Rand Paul May Help More Than Hurt the GOP

Last night Kentucky Senator Rand Paul delivered a televised response warning against President Obama’s appeal for military intervention in Syria. Paul contended the president had failed to make a compelling case that the two-year ongoing Syrian civil war poses a risk to our national security. TheReason-Rupe poll shows nearly two-thirds of Americans also doubt it is necessary for the US to intervene in Syria to protect either US security or credibility.

While President Obama has not ruled out the possibility of launching military airstrikes against Syrian military targets even without Congressional approval, Paul argues this is unconstitutional. Even aside from constitutionality concerns, nearly three-fourths of Americans oppose airstrikes without Congress passing a resolution. Rand Paul cited a warning from an old exchange between James Madison and Thomas Jefferson in which Madison contended:

“The Constitution supposes what the history of all governments demonstrates, that the Executive is the branch of power most … prone to [war]”

Similarly, Reason-Rupe finds roughly half of Americans (47 percent) believe the political establishment in Washington DC is more likely to favor military action than the public.

Over 200 years later, roughly half of Americans are in line with James Madison’s view of the centralized state’s propensity for military action.

Sen. Paul was not invited by the Republican Party to give a rebuttal to the president’s speech, but Paulchose to do so “as a concerned senator.” Paul’s consistent warnings of foreign entanglements abroad have surprised some who came to expect more hawkish foreign policy stances from Republicans. Consequently, the latest Reason-Rupe poll asked Americans if Republicans, like Rand Paul, who generally oppose US military intervention overseas, including in Syria, made them more or less favorable toward the Republican Party, or if it made no difference. Nearly a quarter said it made them more favorable while 16 percent said less favorable.

Interestingly, Independents were twice as likely to say non-interventionist Republicans improved their perception of the Republican Party (22 percent to 11 percent). Nearly a third of Independents who lean toward the Republican Party and 36 percent of tea party supporters said lawmakers like Rand Paul made them more favorable of the Republican Party. While Republicans taking the non-interventionist approach may not move the dial for most Americans, it helps more than it hurts among key Republican constituents.


Nationwide telephone poll conducted September 4-8 2013 interviewed 1013 adults on both mobile (509) and landline (504) phones, with a margin of error +/- 3.7%. Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Full poll results found here. Full methodology can be found here.

Photo Credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  • Snark Plissken||


  • Ted S.||

    You didn't think there were enough articles on the most recent reason poll, did you?

  • Snark Plissken||


  • Drake||

    I don't want him to help the GOP.

    I want him to take it over or destroy it.

  • kinnath||

    Exponential growth starts with one.

  • pmains||

    I thought 1 to any exponent was still 1.

  • kinnath||

    1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 . . . . exponential growth

  • triclops||

    That's geometric growth, pal.

  • JWatts||

    Geometric growth is exponential growth.

  • Death Rock and Skull||

    Either or both of those things would help it though.

  • kinnath||

    Well, Rand is the only reason that I am still registered as a Republican.

  • robc||

    His father was the only reason I ever was in the first place.

  • kinnath||

    Me too

  • Fist of Etiquette||

    So Rand Paul is only opposing the war for the politics of it. I knew it!

  • Pro Libertate||

    Say, Vladie and Bashie, have you seen them yet?
    But they're so spaced out, Barry and the Threats.
    Oh, but they're weird and they're wonderful,
    Oh, Barry he's really keen.
    He's got electric boots, a mohair suit,
    You know I read it in a magazine.
    Barry and the Threats.

  • Libertarius||

    Hey kids, plug into the matrix
    They're bernankified
    But Bennie makes them jobless
    We shall monetize, let us take outselves a loan
    Where we fight our parents over communal loot
    To make the other pay the tab

    B-B-B-Barry and the Threats
    B-B-B-Bennie and the Fed

    M-M-M-Monetizing debt lol

  • Libertarius||

    Bennie Bennie Bennie Bennie!
    Bennie and the Feeeyyuuuudddddd

  • Raven Nation||

    AmSpec trashes RP:

    Bizarre quote:

    "[Alex] Jones is to Senator Paul what the Reverend Wright was to Barack Obama."

    Fortunately most of the comments rip the author.

  • Drake||

    AmSpec seems to be oscillating these days. When Rino's like Goldstein attack Paul, there is a good beating in the comments.

  • John C. Randolph||

    Rand didn't sit in a church and listen to Jones preach every sunday for over a decade.


  • Jake W||

    The greatest support we (libertarian-leaning folks and our candidates) have is 6 from the Tea Party? Looks like we're fucked then, let's pack it up everybody. Where are we going? Where can't the stupid people find us?

  • Jake W||

    Thirty-six percent. Fucking squirrels.

  • Robert||

    Let that be a lesson to everyone: Don't fuck squirrels while you're commenting.

  • Anders||

    I'd have more respect for Paul if he told it like it is - we're Saudi Arabia's bitch and they do not want to handle this personally. They want us to deal with it, like we dealt with Iraq. And Kuwait.


Get Reason's print or digital edition before it’s posted online