Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Trump Administration

Some Bribes, as a Treat

Plus: Data center backlash, Anthropic job-loss predictions, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 9.10.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Donald Trump speaks at the RNC midterm convention | Laura Brett/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Laura Brett/Sipa USA/Newscom)

The classic strategy: Any parent knows bribery is the path to compliance. And President Donald Trump appears to be applying this concept to the voting public.

"Because we've done so well, and because our country is making so much money, that—only I can make this promise to you, and here is my promise—if the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them, because of our economic, tremendous economic success…I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000," he said at the Republican National Committee's midterm convention last night. This would cost more than $1 trillion.

The asterisk is that this money would need to be spent in the United States, according to the president. (It's not clear how this would be enforced.)

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

On principle, this type of bribery is wrong: Politicians should be pitching policy that can improve our lives (ideally by getting government out of the way wherever necessary, and limiting it to its most essential functions), not promising handouts. (Democrats have, of course, been playing the promising-handouts game for a long time, especially since the Bernie Sanders wing of the party shifted toward universal everything and away from means testing.)

But also, our national debt hit $40 trillion for the first time ever last month. We simply can't afford this. Although politicians from both major parties seem to believe the bill will never come due, that's not true: Servicing the massive interest on our debt has become a bigger and bigger line item in our budget that crowds out other spending. This will only become worse the larger the debt grows. Investors might lose confidence, over time, in the U.S. government's ability to pay back the debt, and it's also likely that future taxpayers will have to shoulder the burden of our current spending. It's a bad situation, and one that neither party in its current form seems equipped to dial back.

Consider, too, that if Trump actually made good on this promise, it would be likely to have an inflationary effect, entering the economy all at once. But Trump can't get the idea out of his head that he needs to bribe Americans. Back when Elon Musk was tackling Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts (which ended up being relatively minimal in terms of cost savings), Trump publicly toyed with the idea of returning that money to the American public via a "DOGE dividend." In that situation, it wasn't the absolute worst impulse to say hey taxpayers, let's return some of the money we collected from you. But there has to be an eye toward the U.S. government's broader financial picture, which I would characterize as pretty bad.

since becoming president again, Trump has promised:
-$5000 stimulus checks via "DOGE dividend"
-$2000 stimulus checks via "tariff dividend"
-$1000+ checks via "savings" from expiring ACA subsidies
-$5000 "dividend" if Rs win midterms
no checks have been issued https://t.co/aJaUN79WPe

— Catherine Rampell (@crampell) September 10, 2026

Of course, part of Trump's overall pitch last night was that our economy's doing great, and to the extent that it's doing poorly in any area, it's the Democrats who are to blame. "I'm bringing the prices way down," he said. Democrats "caused it"—meaning high prices—"but we're fixing it." Gas prices are "going down as soon as we win the war with Iran." This stood in stark contrast to other Republicans' pitches—that high inflation and cost-of-living issues are, in fact, a problem.


Scenes from New York: "The city has announced that A.I. cannot be used in elementary and middle school and has set limits on digital devices," writes James Barron for The New York Times. "But enforcement guidelines are unclear." Details of the policy within.


QUICK HITS

  • "The rush of data center construction has fueled a potent bipartisan backlash across the country this year, creating unusual political alliances ahead of the November midterms. Democrats hope the anger will weaken Republicans among some of their most reliable rural voters. Republicans are betting that although those voters may dislike data centers, they are not ready to abandon the party over them," reports The New York Times. "The stakes are particularly high in Texas, home to more data centers than any other state except Virginia and where Republicans face the biggest political threat to their statewide dominance in years."
  • Anthropic has shared an interactive model with the public that projects how AI deployment might affect the whole economy. In the extreme scenarios, it looks like knowledge workers lose out most of all:

Anthropic's Economics team is sharing a new model of how AI might affect economic growth, jobs, wages, and more by 2030.

Explore the scenarios, tell us what you think will happen, and see how your answers compare to more than 10,000 Americans. https://t.co/AvQlEZNxR0

— Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) September 9, 2026

  • "Social-media influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate were denied bail Wednesday as they fight potential extradition to the U.K. on charges of rape and sex trafficking," reports The Wall Street Journal. "U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis in Miami said the brothers failed to establish that they are entitled to be released from detention while the proceedings are ongoing. The judge raised concerns that the brothers were a flight risk and said there were no special circumstances that warranted their release."
  • The European Central Bank is raising interest rates due to inflation woes.
  • Last night, a democratic socialist named David Morales won the Democratic primary for mayor of Providence, Rhode Island. "A victory for Morales, 27, in November would make him the latest democratic socialist to lead a U.S. city," reports The Washington Post. "New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, both democratic socialists, took office this year, and Janeese Lewis George is favored to become mayor of Washington, D.C., next year." Not good!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Court Packing Is a Bad Idea. But It’s Still Constitutional.

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Trump AdministrationGovernment SpendingInflationElection 2026MidtermCongressNational DebtBudget DeficitDebtEconomicsDonald TrumpPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (174)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Anthropic has shared an interactive model with the public that projects how AI deployment might affect the whole economy.

    I remember when it was predicted the Segway would revolutionize the entire transportation industry.

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      Who cares how the economy is after we're all killed by AI?

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Yeah, but that was a stupid (if pretty cool) scooter. AI is already replacing lots of work. It's also creating a lot of stupid, pointless bullshit, but I don't doubt it will cause big changes in how things get done.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        It is also creating a lot of new jobs to correct the failures of AI produced work.

        In reality what AI is doing is removing entry level work. Thats it.

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          I have no specific prediction on what the outcome is going to look like in the long run. It is going to change a lot of things. Removing a lot of entry level work is not a minor change when it comes to employment and effects on the economy.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            So far what we've seen, and what has been reported by others on slash dot or at engineering conferences, is that they are losing the future subject matter experts. Largely early career people. AI makes the same mistakes as them, but just does it more quickly. Senior engineers and programmers now spend more time fixing and optimizing product.

            Having used some of the coding AI agents, I can say it isnt improving. It seeks the simplest output of code and design, not optimized, limiting resources, or caring about security elements. It hasn't improved even after 5 years of the company trying to train it specifically for the company needs. We've started primarily rehiring early career, teaching them out to use AI for first pass, then working with them to show how to take the first pass and make it usable.

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              My company wasn't exactly an early adopter of this stuff, so I don't have much perspective on how it's developing over time. What I mostly see is senior devs using it to speed up first pass work. It's also really useful for making testing tools and things like that that just need to work and don't need optimization.

              1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                We were hoping ourselves it could automate test code more capable than it has, but even coverage tools show the test code missing a lot of coverage as well as lacking potential complex conditions that would fail code.

                It does cover 80% of the more simplistic tests though.

                So far it has been terrible on testing anything FPGA related.

        2. charliehall   2 months ago

          "correct the failures of AI produced work"

          I am lazy. I don't want to have to waste my time to correct AI. So I don't use it.

    3. StackOfCoins   2 months ago

      Comparing a thinking machine to a fucking Segway is pretty rich.

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        Predictions are rarely correct was the point.

        https://www.theswaddle.com/why-people-still-believe-in-predictions-even-though-theyre-rarely-true

    4. B G   2 months ago

      Not just the transportation industry. in the run-up to the reveal, it was promised that "IT" would potentially cause significant change and improvement to virtually every aspect of human civilization.

      1. charliehall   2 months ago

        I remember when it was "IT"!

  2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Trump has promised money to people...
    So...
    He's a 90s democrat?
    ....
    News at 11?

    1. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

      yep. he's always been a 90s democrat. don't tell his fans though, it makes them really angry to realize they support high taxes, massive wealth redistribution, and unions.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        Every Maga person knows who he is, your the retarded faggot.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        High taxes? Like were in the BBB or 2017 tax cuts? Do you just say retarded shit for fun?

        Also how many fed union workers has he fired at this point? He supports private industry ones, but not oblivious. You remain a fucking retard lol.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          psst: don't tell Jesse who cut capital gains tax rates in the 90s

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          psst: don't tell Jesse that the federal workforce decreased all throughout the decade of the 1990s

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            Down to 2.9M in 2000.

            Yet, it is 2.06M now.

            Yup, nothing for Trump to crow about...

            And this was AFTER the massive increase in federal jobs before Trump...

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              They cant help themselves with their awful "well aktually" takes. Always devoid of common sense and facts.

              They also continue to avoid that they cheer the very suits and judicial rulings from inferior judges have stopped him from doing more as they complain about him not doing more. Jeff and qb are the same.

          2. DesigNate   2 months ago

            Was it Clinton that reduced the federal workforce, or was it the Republican Congress who actually tried to reign in some spending?

            1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

              It was Bush 41 and “Thousand Points of Light” and then Clinton seizing on that to start funneling cash to friendly NGOs, as well as hiring contractors

      3. B G   2 months ago

        Don't tell his haters either. At some level it might invade or disrupt their doublethink about how everything he says is a hate crime, and everything he does is a crime against humanity and a threat to the republic, but his actual agenda is the same one they've been supporting for decades except for maybe which ideology his USSC nominees are willing to set aside the Constitution for.

        The shitcoin crypto scam that he put his name on and the ballroom aside, it's hard to tell what parts of what he's doing in office are really that different from what's been done by multiple previous administrations except that he's not framing it with euphamisms or hiding it in the "process".

        The people who hate trump are far more upset about the possibility of a name change to the Kennedy Center than they were about Obama ordering the CIA to assassinate US Citizens (one of them 16 years old) via drone strike or about the existence of the "kids in cages" camps prior to Jan 20, 2017.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Did he promise to let me keep my doctor too?

      I mean, even by relatively loose libertarian standards promising a bajillion dollars and then not paying is one thing, while (not even) promising not to take people's property, lower their costs, and give them more choices and then taking their property, raising their costs, and leaving them fewer options are two pretty radically different things.

      SSDD - RFK Jr./Rand Paul: People should be free, as in speech, to get the vaccination if they want to, but they shouldn't be forced to get it *or* pay for it if they don't want to.
      Everyone who isn't an avowed, alt-right, Neo-Nazi Fascist: Why do you hate grandma, black people, and waffles?

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Did he promise to let me keep my doctor too?

        He did promise to lower your prescription drug prices by 1,000%. I mean, that's a lot of percents! How can you not believe the man?

        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

          https://harshbarger.house.gov/media/op-eds/1000-149-trump-just-unlocked-biggest-drug-price-drop-60-years

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Still not a 1,000% decrease. Try again!

            1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

              The guy who never heard of hyperbole.

        2. B G   2 months ago

          Promising a 1000% decrease is the kind of hyperbole that's rated as a "lie" from trump, but "needs context" if it came from AOC or Joe Biden. Gotta love when the "fact checkers" hire former partisan activists to handle their political coverage.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        If you would just willingly do what democrats demanded you to do, they wouldn't be forced to make you. Just ask jeff.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          It's so weird, I never made that claim, but Jesse and his pals DO make a variation of that claim all the time. How many times have we been told something along the lines of "well, we just HAVE to have ICE agents marauding through the cities, because Biden 'opened the border' and created this mess?" The lesson here, clearly, is that if only you would willingly do what Republicans expect you to do, they wouldn't be forced to be authoritarian dickheads to make you obey Republican priorities.

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

            You did make that claim

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              Yeap.

            2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              Hey found it.

              That is the status quo. Government uses force, in the form of taxes and redistribution, to purchase housing for those who are homeless. I am saying that if we don't want the status quo, but we also seek a situation in which those who are homeless have some access to housing, then it would require voluntary acts on behalf of others in order to help provide that housing.

              https://reason.com/2021/10/03/how-the-cdc-became-americas-landlord/?comments=true#comment-9137501

              Government uses force because it isnt voluntarily. Nowhere does he claim it isnt the governments role.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                Never change. You dredge up 5-year-old comments in order to distract from the terrible job your cult leader is doing.

                It's just so amusing that you think that this statement is a gotcha.

                1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

                  No, you lied, and are trying to distract from lying about one of your legion of idiotic takes

              2. DesigNate   2 months ago

                He said the same thing about Covid policies, if memory serves.

                1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                  He did. I'd have to find the thread. Was masks and vaccines.

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  Oh, I understand the criticism now! My point, in that above quote, is that if we don't want the government to be doing things like forcibly redistributing wealth in order to provide housing to homeless people, then someone else will have to voluntarily take the initiative to provide that housing instead. I guess Jesse and you all must think that "providing housing to homeless people" is just some crazy left-wing Democrat idea that no self-respecting red-blooded American conservative would want any part of. If the government stops providing housing to homeless people, AND if no one else voluntarily provides housing to homeless people, then homeless people will just remain homeless and die on the streets, and THAT'S THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO WORK. The correct solution is just for homeless people to die, out of sight, without bothering anyone else. I see now! Thanks for the clarification!

                  1. DesigNate   2 months ago

                    I want to make sure I’m understanding your position correctly and not just misconstruing what you’re saying.

                    It is your position that if citizens don’t voluntarily step up to solve some problem (climate change, homelessness, etc.), then of course the government is going to step in and do so (whether they actually fix the problem is another thing).

                    And then, not only is not acting grossly immoral, the only moral actors are the ones who would force everyone to deal with the problem (usually through taxation).

                    Does that about sum it up?

                    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      My position is that social problems exist in the world. Demanding the end of the welfare state does not eliminate the problems that the welfare state was ostensibly created to solve.

                      It is your position that if citizens don’t voluntarily step up to solve some problem (climate change, homelessness, etc.), then of course the government is going to step in and do so (whether they actually fix the problem is another thing).

                      Broadly, yes - the government will step in to try to 'solve' a problem, either because the public demands it, or because the people in charge will not 'let a crisis go to waste'.

                      Any social problem that exists WILL get addressed in one way or another, whether it is via voluntary means or via coercive (government) means. If the voluntary means are insufficient, then the coercive means will be more than happy to fill in the gap. If we want to AVOID this outcome, then we as free moral people should do what we can to make sure that there is no gap that needs filling, and to volunteer our time and efforts to address these problems without coercion.

                      And then, not only is not acting grossly immoral, the only moral actors are the ones who would force everyone to deal with the problem (usually through taxation).

                      No that is not my position and it does not follow from what I wrote. Not acting is immoral, yes - but acting via coercion is also immoral, just in a different way. The *moral* course of action is to act voluntarily, and to persuade others to act voluntarily.

                    2. DesigNate   2 months ago

                      “Demanding the end of the welfare state does not eliminate the problems that the welfare state was ostensibly created to solve.”

                      You cannot eliminate the problems that the welfare state was created to solve (mostly because it wasn’t created to solve those problems, it was created so people could offload that responsibility onto the government). Expecting a solution to any given problem that the government created/made worse is a fallacy. Especially for intractable things such as homelessness or poverty.

                      “If we want to AVOID this outcome, then we as free moral people should do what we can to make sure that there is no gap that needs filling, and to volunteer our time and efforts to address these problems without coercion.”

                      Americans give more of their time and lucre than any other nation, possibly in human history. We are already doing what you purport to support (voluntarily trying to tackle a problem). And yet, the coercion remains.

                      “No that is not my position and it does not follow from what I wrote.”

                      You sarcastically implied that anyone who disagrees with you just wants homeless people to die on the street, thus it follows that the “crazy left-wing Democrats” using government to “provide housing to homeless people” (a dubious claim in itself) are more moral.

                      “Not acting is immoral, yes”

                      I flatly reject this premise, as any individualist should. No one is entitled to your action (labor, skills, what have you), and thus inaction cannot be immoral. Especially on a governmental scale where “action” tends to lead to 2nd and 3rd order effects that decrease liberty.

                      It seems to me that you’ve fallen into the classic socialist trap of equating not wanting the government involved in something with not wanting that thing being done at all.

            3. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

              Yes, seconded, I saw it.

    3. charliehall   2 months ago

      Actually, Bill Clinton promised money (Middle Class Tax Cut!) but ended up ending the budget deficit instead.

      1. B G   2 months ago

        The funniest part about the idea that Clinton "balanced the budget" is that the bulk of the 1996 campaign was centered on the question of whether eliminating the deficit ($107Billion that year, which seems awfully quaint anymore, as does the $5Trillion National Debt that even the Dems were somewhat opposed to increasing much more) could be done over 5 years or needed to be spread over 8 years because the GOP plan to do it faster would "cause too much pain" to those in the greatest need. Then when it almost entirely cleared up in 3 years, the same Dems who said that 5 years was too fast were falling over themselves to claim that Bill had done it all single-handed, since it's always been unimaginable that the Congress who controls all spending might have a hand in how much that spending exceeds revenues.

        Also ironic, the "general fund" balance in FY1999 and FY2000 actually still had a small deficit, but that deficit was less than the surplus being run by Social Security at the time. This means that adoption of Al Gore's "lock box" policy of completely separating the accounting would have immediately eliminated the supposed "surplus" that the Dems were claiming the Federal Government was projecting for FY2021, although the stock/tech equities bubble bursting starting in April 2000 took care of that long before the tax cuts which GWB enacted in early 2021 (which the Dems also blamed for crashing the markets, which they mostly denied had ever been in "bubble" territory in the late 1990s) could have had any measurable effect.

        Not quite as impressive as the roll-call of basically every significant figure among the Dems saying in October 2020 that they'd "never trust trump's vaccine" and that excessive focus on vax development instead of forcing the mass production of ventilators (even after the vents were determined to have been useless or worse for Covid all along) was his "single largest failure of leadership", then in Feb 2021 calling for a federal mandate for everyone to get the jab and calling anyone who was "vaccine hesitant" terrorists and even supporting the idea of following Australia in building internment camps for the "unvaxxed" (for Covid, but not for Measels or Whooping Cough) and even managing to explain how imprisoning those who refused the shot wasn't in any way at odds with the "principle" of bodily autonomy.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    The European Central Bank is raising interest rates due to inflation woes.

    All due to Trump’s tariffs.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Definitely not due to massive migration into a welfare state.

    2. B G   2 months ago

      How are trump's tariffs (which are all paid by consumers of imports to the USA, and increasing prices on this side of "the pond") causing inflation in Europe?

      Is it at all possible that inflation in the EU might have some connection to the ongoing growth of the M2 money supply, which is up by more than 30% since the start of the Pandemic, and around 10% since the end of 2023?

      Even Marx probably accepted the idea that there's a direct correlation between money supply and currency debasement. Or at least he would have if he'd lived to witness it being proven by the Wiemar government after WW1, and had any reason to think that a system would be adopted in which money supply could actually be modified by any means other than sovereign acquisition of more gold.

  4. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

    I am skeptical about Trump's bribe of a $5K rebate and would like a show of good faith. Why doesn't he send every American a $2.5K rebate right now with a promise of another $2.5K after Republican win the midterms.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Ironically you support increases to welfare programs.

      1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

        Really, when did I do this?

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Are we doing the sea lioning act again?

          1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

            Guess you can't name anything.

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              I mean besides your entire comment history?

              Let's test this.

              Should immigrants get welfare support? Yes or no?

              Should we end welfare, food stamps, etc?

              Did you support the make work reforms under BBB?

              Are you against ACA, medicaid and medicare?

              Should be an easy answer to these for you.

            2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              Guess it wasn't easy.

  5. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Republicans are fleeing data center support and running towards open borders, unlimited abortion, funding known fraud, and socialism!

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      That started in 2016. Trump has no problem with abortion and suggested to his mistress that she abort the daughter he fathered out of wedlock. Trump has long been a known fraudster, and he is taking over businesses as no President since Woodrow Wilson (and Wilson's takeovers were limited to the railroads).

  6. BYODB   2 months ago


    On principle, this type of bribery is wrong: Politicians should be pitching policy that can improve our lives (ideally by getting government out of the way wherever necessary, and limiting it to its most essential functions), not promising handouts. (Democrats have, of course, been playing the promising-handouts game for a long time, especially since the Bernie Sanders wing of the party shifted toward universal everything and away from means testing.)

    I wonder if the author believes that tax 'refunds' people get year after year are handouts and amount to bribery.

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      Except that's based on what you actually paid over the previous year (except for refundable credits, which are handouts and could be considered bribery, though I'm not sure that's the right word for that or Trump's promised checks). If this is going to every citizen regardless of what they paid in taxes, then it is a handout and redistribution.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        The headline never actually matches the policy.

        Against this in general unless it is non credit tax reduction.

        But right now everyone is guessing in the most disingenuous way possible.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          But right now everyone is guessing in the most disingenuous way possible.

          Which appropriate considering it's coming from the most disingenuous president possible.

        2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          here is my promise...I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000,"

          If you think this statement means Trump will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000, you are being as disingenuous as is possible.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Jesse knows Trump is lying.

            1. charliehall   2 months ago

              Everybody knows Trump is lying. All the time.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            You remain quite dumb qb as statements are not policy.

            I see why youre so confused all the fucking time. Youre too intellectually lazy to understand a statement is not a policy. Find me one time a policy has ended up being exactly the same as a statement for a change. Not even the no tip on taxes was simple, there are exclusions and caps. Increases to child tax credits had caps.

            This is why youre so fucking dishonest. Or youre just retarded.

            Also shows exactly what I claimed, youre disingenuous.

            You also never hold yourself or democrats to the same standard. Weird.

            Fucking retard.

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              You get used to this too.

  7. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    WNBA may be in trouble and forced to allow Kanter to play as they already admitted a Trans player a few years back.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/08/former-transgender-player-case-complicates-wnbas-effort-to-exclude-men/

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      "Biological males should not be allowed to play on any women’s sports team."

      Define "biological male".

    2. B G   2 months ago

      That "transgender" player also still identifies as a "woman", but claims not to be cisgender despite that identificaion being in line with the gender they/he/she (the player in question has used all three versions of pronouns at different times, not sure what the current version is going by) was "assigned at birth".

      It's anyone's guess what manner of "transition" beyond the chest masculizaition surgery might be in the plans for such an individual.

      Most people would probably think that having a player who was born female and claims to be "trans" would mean that the WNBA has, on a self-identification basis, had a "male" player already. Or if the player claiming to be "trans" isn't relevant because the birth sex was female, then they've already established a policy in which they'd have to refuse any "trans woman" who was born male.

  8. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Actual news post.

    KSTP
    @KSTP
    Minnesota has now served 450 million free school meals as the program’s cost continues to rise beyond early projections.

    https://x.com/KSTP/status/2097440353787748703

    Apparently less people know what free means than know what temporary means.

  9. Adans smith   2 months ago

    I never bribed my daughters, I just cut off the money and transportation . We lived far out of town.

  10. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Difference in blue states and red states.

    In NYC people stop and film a crazy lady killing someone. Red state a waiter tackles someone trying to shoot his ex.

    https://www.wbtv.com/2026/09/06/former-attorney-convicted-attempted-murder-after-trying-shoot-ex-wife-restaurant/

    Luckily this man can say he was in a state of temporary insanity and get off. Surely the clancy defenders will defend this man also.

    Also watch out women react, scream and point as their method of self defense.

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      In NYC people stop and film a crazy lady killing someone.

      You get used to it.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        So, it's like being raped or fired from a federal job?

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          No. You get over those. That's a huge difference.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      "Attempt to commit offense"?

      WTF? There's video of the guy walking up, pulling the gun out of his jacket, pulling the trigger, going to manipulate the safety, and then getting tackled/disrupted.

      No shit attempted murder. Case closed. Throw the book. Cue CJ Ciaramella's 14,000 word screed about the problem with America's prison system.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        They also call shooters "trigger pullers" now. The left is all about narrative and language control.

    3. Kungpowderfinger   2 months ago

      Here in Sacramento we had the 50 closed down in the early morning due to a police shooting a guy who pulled a gun on them during routine traffic stop. Then closed again in the afternoon due to some asshole shooting a woman he was stalking, then killing himself on the highway. Then the highway gets shut down that evening due to some psycho running across it and getting killed by a car hitting him. All the same highway in Sacramento, all the same day.

      https://www.sacbee.com/news/local/article317184755.html

      Now there’s your difference between a blue state and a red state.

      1. creech   2 months ago

        sure, but if you had bullet trains you wouldn't have any auto traffic to disrupt, would you?

        1. See.More   2 months ago

          But... but... you would need high capacity, semi-fully-automatic, military-grade assault tracks to shoot bullet trains...

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        But Sacramento got used to it, so all good. Just ask qb.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Yep

    4. Moonrocks   2 months ago

      No shit. In NYC, attempting to stop a violent crime means getting arrested and charged with assault.

    5. charliehall   2 months ago

      Difference between blue and red states:

      New York homicide rate, 2024: 3.5 per 100,000.
      Mississippi homicide rate, 2024: 19.7 per 100,000.

      Homicides are news in NYC because they are rare today. NYC will likely end 2026 with the lowest homicide rate since 1944.

  11. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Turns out the entire media driven narrative if the armed attempt on Dem Amy Acton was nothing more than someone trying to ask her a question. Questions are violence.

    https://x.com/ginamilan_/status/2097460708195676494

    Gina Milan
    @ginamilan_
    WOW. The prosecutor just blew up Amy Acton’s entire narrative.

    She says the video shows Patrick Havas entering the tent, recording and calling Acton’s name. He doesn’t charge at her. He doesn’t touch her. No weapon is drawn. He doesn’t even get near her.

    That’s a pretty big problem for a campaign claiming an “armed man lunged” at her.

    The evidence doesn’t match the story. She lied. Oof. x.com/AlexandraNRoss…

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Oh. And conveniently Actons campaign says all videos stopped rolling just as tge man entered. Coincidence im sure.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        On top of that, the campaign wants you to know that Dr. Amy Acton- a physician (their clarification)- stayed in the tent to render aid to the victims. Pretty sure she hasn't practiced in a very long time, if ever, because she's a bureaucrat. This was a photo op to remind all the Branch Covidians that not all heroes wear capes.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          I render aid to my kids when they fall down too.

          1. mad.casual   2 months ago

            Clancy was a nurse.

        2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

          She also helped deliver a baby, but then realizing she was a democrat quickly killed it saying pro choice

  12. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    More fraud.

    https://x.com/SecRollins/status/2097284283740176474

    6 of the 9 were illegals, one was a green card holder.

  13. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    It's the 1 year anniversary of confirming that all leftists are psychotic murderous cancers.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      Wow three grey boxes. If only I cared what the pedofile has to say

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        Hmm I replied and got 3 more pedo grey boxes will the trend continue?

  14. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    I am confident we will receive the $5,000 check right after we receive our DOGE checks.

    Why are we even taking this proposal seriously? It is a lie. Everyone knows it is a lie. There isn't going to be any payment regardless of who wins Congress for the next session. He is saying whatever he has to say in order to win, truth be damned. That is the entire story of Trump.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      Not only am I still waiting for my DOGE check, I am still waiting for my dividend check from the International Zionist Banking Cartel that controls the entire world economy!

  15. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we discover who the real vandals are of the Lincoln Reflecting Pool.

  16. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we find all of those Haitians in Springfield who were eating cats and dogs.

  17. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we uncover all of the Soros-paid operatives who stuffed ballot boxes for Biden in 2020.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      It will be a Soros guy, Scott Bessent, who mails the checks!

  18. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we accept Iran's unconditional surrender for the eleventh time.

  19. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after the national debt is entirely eliminated, as Trump promised to do in 2016. I'm sure this will happen any day now!

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

      Jeffy is spiraling again.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Oh I'm having fun. It's fun pointing out all the ways why we shouldn't trust Trump's promises.

        Do YOU believe that we will actually get a $5,000 check if Republicans keep Congress? If so, explain to us all why we should believe Trump THIS TIME.

        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

          Boring

      2. damikesc   2 months ago

        It doesn't take much for him to do that.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Liar. It takes immense effort for him to complete one spiral.

  20. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Anthropic has shared an interactive model with the public that projects how AI deployment might affect the whole economy. In the extreme scenarios, it looks like knowledge workers lose out most of all:

    Is it a hockey stick?

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      But will the coders learn to dj?

  21. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after prescription drug prices have fallen by 1,000%. At least! Maybe more!

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Zzzzzz

    2. charliehall   2 months ago

      Trump promised they would drop by 1500%

  22. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we discover who was in the Antifa terrorist cell who staged the Jan. 6 riots.

    1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

      We will receive the $5,000 checks right after we all put our petty differences aside, STOP the endless Blame Games... And Hang Mike Pence!!!

  23. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    I think you get the idea. We're not getting a check. If you actually think there is even a chance we would get a check, you are a moron. If you know that there is no chance we are getting a check but push the idea anyway, then you are deliberately deceitful.

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Yes, we got the idea.

      You're neither funny NOR engaging.

      1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

        Hey Damiksec, damiskec, and damikesc, Damned-and-Sick, and ALL of your other socks…
        How is your totalitarian scheme to FORCE people to buy Reason magazines cumming along?

        Free speech (freedom from “Cancel Culture”) comes from Facebook, Twitter, Tik-Tok, and Google, right? THAT is why we need to pass laws to severely constrict these DANGEROUS companies (which, ugh!, the BASTARDS, put profits above people!)!!! We must pass new laws to retract “Section 230” and FORCE the evil corporations to provide us all (EXCEPT for my political enemas, of course!) with a “UBIFS”, a Universal Basic Income of Free Speech!

        So leftist “false flag” cummenters will inundate Reason-dot-com with shitloads of PROTECTED racist comments, and then pissed-off readers and advertisers and buyers (of tReason magazine) will all BOYCOTT tReason! And right-wing idiots like Damned-and-Sick Damikesc will then FORCE people to support Reason, so as to nullify the attempts at boycotts! THAT is your ultimate authoritarian “fix” here!!!

        “Now, to “protect” Reason from this meddling here, are we going to REQUIRE readers and advertisers to support Reason, to protect tReason from boycotts?”
        Yup. Basically. Sounds rough. (Quote damikesc, AKA Damned-and-Sick)

        (Etc.)

        See https://reason.com/2020/06/24/the-new-censors/

        (And Asshole Extraordinaire will NEVER take back Shits' totalShitarian bullshit!!!! 'Cause Asshole Extraordinaire is already PERVFECT in every way!!!)

        This (above damikesc quote) is a gem of the damnedest dumbness of damikesc! Like MANY “pervfect in their own minds” asshole authorShitarians around here, Shit swill NEVER take back ANY of the stupidest and most evil things that Shit has written! I have more of those on file… I deploy them to warn other readers to NOT bother to try to reason with the most slutterly unreasonable of the nit-wit twit-shits around here!

  24. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Jeff seems active this morning. He always has great takes.

    Bears.

    https://reason.com/podcast/2021/10/25/freedom-responsibility-and-coronavirus-policy/#comment-9176512

    Rapes

    https://reason.com/2024/06/24/byo-a-c/?comments=true#comment-10615352

    https://reason.com/2024/06/25/americas-mayors-say-the-heartland-needs-immigrants/?comments=true#comment-10616918

    We should all listen to jeff.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Poor Jesse. He's been completely outed at this point as nothing but a Team Red sycophant. He cannot argue on the basis of policy or principle because no one here believes that Jesse actually adheres to any fixed principle or policy. He really is an idiot who falls for every Team Red narrative and happily repeats it all even the ones he knows are false.

      Go ahead Jesse, tell us why we should believe Trump THIS TIME that he's going to send checks out to everyone. Go ahead.

      Jesse KNOWS that Trump is lying but he doesn't care, he wants to change the subject instead.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        I will vote for him to protect me from bears in trunks.

        And to stop guys from jerking off next to women without their knowledge.

  25. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Womp womp. New Missouri map is illegal, must use old map.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-blocks-missouris-attempt-use-newly-drawn-republican-cong-rcna596857

    This entire affair has been a shameless attempted power grab.

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

      Unlike Maryland where they have the state Supreme Court ruling in opposition to the state constitution?

      JFC, jeffy, this is the way it has to be done these days. If you don't grab at power, you lose it. It would be far less ethical to let Ds keep up their shenanigans without attempting to counter it.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Got it, "the ends justify the means"

        Congratulations, you've just justified using violence to achieve political aims

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          After Kirk, I'm all on board for it. Your side has already shown, for years, that killing people for power is acceptable.

          It is time for some extremely aggressive self-defense against barbarians from the Left.

        2. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

          Except that is not what I said at all. I pointed at the ethical dilemma.

          I give you an actual point to discuss and you default to non-sequitur, ad hominem and absurdity.

          Never change, buddy.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            If you don't grab at power, you lose it. It would be far less ethical to let Ds keep up their shenanigans without attempting to counter it.

            Oh, so there is a limiting principle here? You're against murdering D's even if it means that they "keep up their shenanigans"?

      2. charliehall   2 months ago

        Maryland is using the old maps this year. So is Virginia. The Republicans in MO are still planning to use the illegal maps. Yet they whine about illegal immigrants.

  26. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

    "Not good!"

    Pleonasm (my new word of the day) - adding an unnecessary epithet that was implied in the body of the preceding text. And who says that socialists being elected Mayor of deep blue cities isn't a good thing? It kinda depends on what your preferred outcome is! My preferred outcome would be the hastened death of high population density urban festering sores, followed by bulldozing the remains and planting them with new forests and single family dwellings and gardens.

    1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      Pfffft……well now, ^ here’s a far right culture war bigot who refuses to use mass transit in a large urban area!

      Right, jeff?

  27. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    Trump is a criminal and a shit bag.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Jeff already used up the quota of retard socialist comments foe the day. Please come back tomorrow.

      1. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

        it is telling that you can't be remotely bothered to attempt to defend Trump on this one at all. The policy as announced by Trump is either a corrupt bribe or a boldfaced lie. Either answer is disgusting.

        The fact that all you can do about it is attack other commenters shows me that you know it's wrong too. That's nice at least.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          Is it a bribe? Yup. Would prefer it not happen but that horse left that barn long ago.

          It is no different than promises of "free healthcare", "free housing", etc.

          You did not get offended by that nonsense for...well, years now.

          1. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

            yes i did.

            i would never vote for anyone or support any candidate or office-holder offering free healthcare or free housing.

            but i actually stick to my principles, and if someone i support turns on me, i don't keep licking their boots. you guys could learn a thing or two.

            1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              I asked you the other day to find 5 posts where you've complained about the left or illegals on welfare benefits. You claimed you did it all the time. You provided zero examples.

              Youre a dem cosplaying as libertarian because you live in a deep blue city where your vote doesnt change things.

              Your only principle is you dont have any as your chosen home is so far gone. And instead of trying to change or make your home better you cosplay as a libertarian raging solely against people who may choose slightly better than significantly worse outcomes.

            2. charliehall   2 months ago

              Don't move to Mexico. It has free universal healthcare. You don't even have to be a citizen.

          2. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

            "It is no different than promises of "free healthcare", "free housing", etc."

            I 100% agree with you here. Excellent take. That's the reason I am opposed to Trump on this one. Can you explain why you are not opposed to Trump on this issue if it is "no different" from the communist D policies we should be against?

            1. damikesc   2 months ago

              Because I know, for a fact, he cannot conceivably do it. He won't get 100% Republican votes for it and he is unlikely to get any Democrat votes for it.

              Democrats, on the other hand, are amazingly good at passing unbelievably unpopular bills by bribing members with sinecure after they lose their next election after voting for it.

              1. charliehall   2 months ago

                He always gets 100% Republican votes when he demands them. The Republican Party is a Cult.

                1. damikesc   2 months ago

                  Explains why the SAVE Act was passed so easily.

                2. DesigNate   2 months ago

                  This is so laughably false, a normal person would be embarrassed they posted it.

            2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              You really cant comprehend what you fucking read.

              Would prefer it not happen

              Mouth the words retard.

            3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              Nevermind. I get it. Youre a woman, being a dem and all, and want emotional caterwauling as the only appropriate response. Ironically, as pointed out, something you never do when people criticize democrats.

              Weird.

            4. middlefinger   2 months ago

              I’m against this policy.

              I am orders of magnitude against the Democrat political party asset seizures, and wealth taxes. I’m against public unions. Im against bankrupt (using per capita) blue cities and blue (1 red) states

              Free healthcare exists. It’s called Medicaid and Emergency room care, this is why California wants to start seizing assets. The asset seizures pay for Medicaid or “FREE HEALTHCARE” for illegals.

              There is free housing called homeless housing, although the auditors can’t figure out if the grant housing exists or where the over one billion transferred by federal taxpayers (again, California) went??

              1. charliehall   2 months ago

                "Democrat political party asset seizures"

                It is Trump who is seizing control of private businesses.

                "and wealth taxes"

                Property taxes are wealth taxes. What would you replace them with?

        2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          I have multiple posts in this very thread chitard. I said im against it but will wait for policy.

          Are you capable of reading? I know you can lie like saying he wants to raises taxes. But can you actually comprehend what you read?

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            I said im against it but will wait for policy.

            translation: "I have to pretend to have some shred of principle so I will claim to be against it, while I wait for the correct narrative to download into my brain so that I know what are the correct talking points to repeat"

        3. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

          It is tit for tat. Game theory. If your opponent lies and makes outrageous promises first. It is only fair to retaliate.

          Ds have promised cradle to grave coddling and the Socialists promise even more. Bernie has been buying votes with graft his entire career.

          1. middlefinger   2 months ago

            Not to mention Mandami.

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            The whole "game theory" rationale only works if the goal here is for one team to beat the other team.

            What if that isn't the goal? What if the goal, instead, is for the government to enact a set of policies that are broadly libertarian in nature, regardless of which team does it?

            Also, like above, you refuse to enunciate any sort of limiting principle. How far can this tit-for-tat go until you say it's gone too far?

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              It's always amusing when Jeffey criticizes other people for not applying consistent principles. It seems very meta that even his criticisms on principles lack principle.

        4. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

          How is it “corrupt”? It may be stupid, but that’s not what the word means.
          Unless you concede that every single Democrat since 1932 has been orders of magnitude more corrupt.

  28. DesigNate   2 months ago

    “The number of federal employees declined across all major agencies in 2025. Nearly 378,000 employees separated during this time and about 127,000 were hired. Most agencies had workforce declines greater than 10%, and multiple agencies had declines exceeding 30%.”

    While these numbers are admirable, I seriously doubt they led to enough money to “give” everyone 5 large. Maybe just shut up, Mr. President?

    1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

      Austin TX home prices have fallen more than 10% since interest rates were raised. Meanwhile in DC, home prices ate double what they in Austin and are still rising. I would take those reports of declining government workforce with a grain of salt.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        There are still a lot of foreign lobbyists and foreign citizens buying property there.

      2. DesigNate   2 months ago

        I try to take all government numbers with a grain of salt.

  29. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    On principle, this type of bribery is wrong: Politicians should be pitching policy that can improve our lives...

    A CHECK WILL IMPROVE MY LIFE

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      🗸 There you go, boomer.

  30. mahonia   2 months ago

    "... it's also likely that future taxpayers will have to shoulder the burden of our current spending." Uh, no, that's actually guaranteed. That would be the definition of public debt (short of defaulting).

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      And if we don't pay through taxes, we'll pay through inflation.

      1. middlefinger   2 months ago

        The COLA inflation is really spiraling in sanctuary subsidy ridden and minimum wage mandated blue states (some sanctuary states give out free food in public schools to illegals and staff). Obamacare is responsible for a significant portion of the increase in medical billing corruption rackets and the policy cost increases that follow. Now another Middle East war. Bond vigilantes uniting and taking over.

        It’s a mess and no one (Rand Paul ??) is talking about cutting spending.

        1. charliehall   2 months ago

          What would you cut? If you don't include Social Security, Medicare, or National Defense, you aren't serious. That is about 3/4 of the federal budget.

          1. middlefinger   2 months ago

            I agree with the Reason position of turning social security into a flat payment, immediately, and save the program. Look it up they’ve written quite a few articles on it.

            Healthcare can be a catastrophic single payer that comes with a 30 percent of adjusted gross income deductible. The deductible can be insured through private insurance companies. Completely eliminates Medicare and Medicaid.

            National defense, I would require pentagon pass audit before congress can throw money in that black hole.

            Property Wealth taxes: There are places that use consumption taxes and additionally pay for local services instead of property taxes, that would be my vote.

    2. middlefinger   2 months ago

      Unless we default and become pre-Meili Argentina. What happened in Argentina is called Collapse. No IMF to bail us out.

      1. charliehall   2 months ago

        And Milei increased the inflation rate to over 290%. He didn't create the mess, but he made it worse.

        1. Marshal   2 months ago

          2001 -1.1%
          2002 25.9%
          2003 13.4%
          2004 4.4%
          2005 9.6%
          2006 10.9%
          2007 25.7%
          2008 23.0%
          2009 15.0%
          2010 25.8%
          2011 22.8%
          2012 25.3%
          2013 24.3%
          2014 38.0%
          2015 26.9%
          2016 40.3%
          2017 24.8%
          2018 47.6%
          2019 53.8%
          2020 36.1%
          2021 50.9%
          2022 94.8%
          2023 211.4%
          2024 117.8%
          2025 31.6%
          2026 33.8%

          Here are Argentina's annual inflation numbers. Milei took office in Dec of 23, so the 211% is his predecessor. It's normal in economics for things to get worse during the transition, while they improve afterward as this table shows. Propagandists stop reporting as soon as things start improving thus leaving the increasing into infinity impression. This was the famed hockey stick of global warning.

          Bjorn Lomborg pointed out decades ago how left wingers shape their reporting by omitting key data to drive false conclusions.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            You just need to remember that chuckiehall is almost incapable of honesty or good faith.

            1. middlefinger   2 months ago

              And a communist to boot

  31. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Because we've done so well, and because our country is making so much money

    40 trillion in debt is making money? Be funny if it weren't so tragic.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      All of MAGA is math impaired.

      1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

        Maybe your [D]emon-crap politicians could vote/push against the BS math for once.
        But I certainly won't be holding my breath for such a miracle to happen.

  32. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    at this point, the best way for the fedgov to get bankrupt is to keep sending me multiple 5k checks as long as they can. That's all i have to say.

  33. TJJ2000   2 months ago

    Humorously, MSNBC anchor Catherine Rampell has the BEST news from this RINO F'Up.
    Yet "no checks have been issued".

    One thing is undeniable.
    Trump failing to deliver promised communist wages is [D]emon-craps BIG curse of him.
    Still. This BS needs to STOP. It is precisely what will kill the US.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Firing Hegseth

Liz Wolfe | 11.10.2026 9:30 AM

The Rise and Fall of Ma Bell

Thomas W. Hazlett | 11.10.2026 8:00 AM

A Bad Day at SCOTUS for Government Accountability

Damon Root | 11.10.2026 7:00 AM

An Absurdist's Exile in Buenos Aires: Witold Gombrowicz's Argentine Years

John Pistelli | From the December 2026 issue

Brickbat: Evergreen Gun Rules

Charles Oliver | 11.10.2026 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason

The All-Argentina Issue is Here

New from Reason: a look into what Javier Milei has accomplished and what it will take to make the most of Argentina’s window for real change. Out now for subscribers.

Subscribe & Start Reading Learn More