Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Trump Administration

Some Bribes, as a Treat

Plus: Data center backlash, Anthropic job-loss predictions, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 9.10.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Donald Trump speaks at the RNC midterm convention | Laura Brett/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Laura Brett/Sipa USA/Newscom)

The classic strategy: Any parent knows bribery is the path to compliance. And President Donald Trump appears to be applying this concept to the voting public.

"Because we've done so well, and because our country is making so much money, that—only I can make this promise to you, and here is my promise—if the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them, because of our economic, tremendous economic success…I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000," he said at the Republican National Committee's midterm convention last night. This would cost more than $1 trillion.

The asterisk is that this money would need to be spent in the United States, according to the president. (It's not clear how this would be enforced.)

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

On principle, this type of bribery is wrong: Politicians should be pitching policy that can improve our lives (ideally by getting government out of the way wherever necessary, and limiting it to its most essential functions), not promising handouts. (Democrats have, of course, been playing the promising-handouts game for a long time, especially since the Bernie Sanders wing of the party shifted toward universal everything and away from means testing.)

But also, our national debt hit $40 trillion for the first time ever last month. We simply can't afford this. Although politicians from both major parties seem to believe the bill will never come due, that's not true: Servicing the massive interest on our debt has become a bigger and bigger line item in our budget that crowds out other spending. This will only become worse the larger the debt grows. Investors might lose confidence, over time, in the U.S. government's ability to pay back the debt, and it's also likely that future taxpayers will have to shoulder the burden of our current spending. It's a bad situation, and one that neither party in its current form seems equipped to dial back.

Consider, too, that if Trump actually made good on this promise, it would be likely to have an inflationary effect, entering the economy all at once. But Trump can't get the idea out of his head that he needs to bribe Americans. Back when Elon Musk was tackling Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) cuts (which ended up being relatively minimal in terms of cost savings), Trump publicly toyed with the idea of returning that money to the American public via a "DOGE dividend." In that situation, it wasn't the absolute worst impulse to say hey taxpayers, let's return some of the money we collected from you. But there has to be an eye toward the U.S. government's broader financial picture, which I would characterize as pretty bad.

since becoming president again, Trump has promised:
-$5000 stimulus checks via "DOGE dividend"
-$2000 stimulus checks via "tariff dividend"
-$1000+ checks via "savings" from expiring ACA subsidies
-$5000 "dividend" if Rs win midterms
no checks have been issued https://t.co/aJaUN79WPe

— Catherine Rampell (@crampell) September 10, 2026

Of course, part of Trump's overall pitch last night was that our economy's doing great, and to the extent that it's doing poorly in any area, it's the Democrats who are to blame. "I'm bringing the prices way down," he said. Democrats "caused it"—meaning high prices—"but we're fixing it." Gas prices are "going down as soon as we win the war with Iran." This stood in stark contrast to other Republicans' pitches—that high inflation and cost-of-living issues are, in fact, a problem.


Scenes from New York: "The city has announced that A.I. cannot be used in elementary and middle school and has set limits on digital devices," writes James Barron for The New York Times. "But enforcement guidelines are unclear." Details of the policy within.


QUICK HITS

  • "The rush of data center construction has fueled a potent bipartisan backlash across the country this year, creating unusual political alliances ahead of the November midterms. Democrats hope the anger will weaken Republicans among some of their most reliable rural voters. Republicans are betting that although those voters may dislike data centers, they are not ready to abandon the party over them," reports The New York Times. "The stakes are particularly high in Texas, home to more data centers than any other state except Virginia and where Republicans face the biggest political threat to their statewide dominance in years."
  • Anthropic has shared an interactive model with the public that projects how AI deployment might affect the whole economy. In the extreme scenarios, it looks like knowledge workers lose out most of all:

Anthropic's Economics team is sharing a new model of how AI might affect economic growth, jobs, wages, and more by 2030.

Explore the scenarios, tell us what you think will happen, and see how your answers compare to more than 10,000 Americans. https://t.co/AvQlEZNxR0

— Anthropic (@AnthropicAI) September 9, 2026

  • "Social-media influencers Andrew and Tristan Tate were denied bail Wednesday as they fight potential extradition to the U.K. on charges of rape and sex trafficking," reports The Wall Street Journal. "U.S. Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis in Miami said the brothers failed to establish that they are entitled to be released from detention while the proceedings are ongoing. The judge raised concerns that the brothers were a flight risk and said there were no special circumstances that warranted their release."
  • The European Central Bank is raising interest rates due to inflation woes.
  • Last night, a democratic socialist named David Morales won the Democratic primary for mayor of Providence, Rhode Island. "A victory for Morales, 27, in November would make him the latest democratic socialist to lead a U.S. city," reports The Washington Post. "New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson, both democratic socialists, took office this year, and Janeese Lewis George is favored to become mayor of Washington, D.C., next year." Not good!

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Court Packing Is a Bad Idea. But It’s Still Constitutional.

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Trump AdministrationGovernment SpendingInflationElection 2026MidtermCongressNational DebtBudget DeficitDebtEconomicsDonald TrumpPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (41)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 hour ago

    Anthropic has shared an interactive model with the public that projects how AI deployment might affect the whole economy.

    I remember when it was predicted the Segway would revolutionize the entire transportation industry.

    1. Quicktown Brix   1 hour ago

      Who cares how the economy is after we're all killed by AI?

    2. Zeb   1 hour ago

      Yeah, but that was a stupid (if pretty cool) scooter. AI is already replacing lots of work. It's also creating a lot of stupid, pointless bullshit, but I don't doubt it will cause big changes in how things get done.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   8 minutes ago

        It is also creating a lot of new jobs to correct the failures of AI produced work.

        In reality what AI is doing is removing entry level work. Thats it.

  2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 hour ago

    Trump has promised money to people...
    So...
    He's a 90s democrat?
    ....
    News at 11?

    1. Murray Rothtard   50 minutes ago

      yep. he's always been a 90s democrat. don't tell his fans though, it makes them really angry to realize they support high taxes, massive wealth redistribution, and unions.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   17 minutes ago

        Every Maga person knows who he is, your the retarded faggot.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   7 minutes ago

        High taxes? Like were in the BBB or 2017 tax cuts? Do you just say retarded shit for fun?

        Also how many fed union workers has he fired at this point? He supports private industry ones, but not oblivious. You remain a fucking retard lol.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   1 hour ago

    The European Central Bank is raising interest rates due to inflation woes.

    All due to Trump’s tariffs.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   4 minutes ago

      Definitely not due to massive migration into a welfare state.

  4. Moderation4ever   1 hour ago

    I am skeptical about Trump's bribe of a $5K rebate and would like a show of good faith. Why doesn't he send every American a $2.5K rebate right now with a promise of another $2.5K after Republican win the midterms.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   3 minutes ago

      Ironically you support increases to welfare programs.

  5. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 hour ago

    Republicans are fleeing data center support and running towards open borders, unlimited abortion, funding known fraud, and socialism!

  6. BYODB   45 minutes ago


    On principle, this type of bribery is wrong: Politicians should be pitching policy that can improve our lives (ideally by getting government out of the way wherever necessary, and limiting it to its most essential functions), not promising handouts. (Democrats have, of course, been playing the promising-handouts game for a long time, especially since the Bernie Sanders wing of the party shifted toward universal everything and away from means testing.)

    I wonder if the author believes that tax 'refunds' people get year after year are handouts and amount to bribery.

    1. Zeb   37 minutes ago

      Except that's based on what you actually paid over the previous year (except for refundable credits, which are handouts and could be considered bribery, though I'm not sure that's the right word for that or Trump's promised checks). If this is going to every citizen regardless of what they paid in taxes, then it is a handout and redistribution.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 minute ago

        The headline never actually matches the policy.

        Against this in general unless it is non credit tax reduction.

        But right now everyone is guessing in the most disingenuous way possible.

  7. JesseAz (RIP CK)   36 minutes ago

    WNBA may be in trouble and forced to allow Kanter to play as they already admitted a Trans player a few years back.

    https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/08/former-transgender-player-case-complicates-wnbas-effort-to-exclude-men/

  8. JesseAz (RIP CK)   35 minutes ago

    Actual news post.

    KSTP
    @KSTP
    Minnesota has now served 450 million free school meals as the program’s cost continues to rise beyond early projections.

    https://x.com/KSTP/status/2097440353787748703

    Apparently less people know what free means than know what temporary means.

  9. Adans smith   34 minutes ago

    I never bribed my daughters, I just cut off the money and transportation . We lived far out of town.

  10. JesseAz (RIP CK)   33 minutes ago

    Difference in blue states and red states.

    In NYC people stop and film a crazy lady killing someone. Red state a waiter tackles someone trying to shoot his ex.

    https://www.wbtv.com/2026/09/06/former-attorney-convicted-attempted-murder-after-trying-shoot-ex-wife-restaurant/

    Luckily this man can say he was in a state of temporary insanity and get off. Surely the clancy defenders will defend this man also.

    Also watch out women react, scream and point as their method of self defense.

    1. Quicktown Brix   4 minutes ago

      In NYC people stop and film a crazy lady killing someone.

      You get used to it.

  11. JesseAz (RIP CK)   32 minutes ago

    Turns out the entire media driven narrative if the armed attempt on Dem Amy Acton was nothing more than someone trying to ask her a question. Questions are violence.

    https://x.com/ginamilan_/status/2097460708195676494

    Gina Milan
    @ginamilan_
    WOW. The prosecutor just blew up Amy Acton’s entire narrative.

    She says the video shows Patrick Havas entering the tent, recording and calling Acton’s name. He doesn’t charge at her. He doesn’t touch her. No weapon is drawn. He doesn’t even get near her.

    That’s a pretty big problem for a campaign claiming an “armed man lunged” at her.

    The evidence doesn’t match the story. She lied. Oof. x.com/AlexandraNRoss…

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   31 minutes ago

      Oh. And conveniently Actons campaign says all videos stopped rolling just as tge man entered. Coincidence im sure.

      1. Ajsloss   15 minutes ago

        On top of that, the campaign wants you to know that Dr. Amy Acton- a physician (their clarification)- stayed in the tent to render aid to the victims. Pretty sure she hasn't practiced in a very long time, if ever, because she's a bureaucrat. This was a photo op to remind all the Branch Covidians that not all heroes wear capes.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 second ago

          I render aid to my kids when they fall down too.

  12. JesseAz (RIP CK)   30 minutes ago

    More fraud.

    https://x.com/SecRollins/status/2097284283740176474

    6 of the 9 were illegals, one was a green card holder.

  13. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   29 minutes ago

    It's the 1 year anniversary of confirming that all leftists are psychotic murderous cancers.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   16 minutes ago

      Wow three grey boxes. If only I cared what the pedofile has to say

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   53 seconds ago

        Hmm I replied and got 3 more pedo grey boxes will the trend continue?

  14. chemjeff radical individualist   23 minutes ago

    I am confident we will receive the $5,000 check right after we receive our DOGE checks.

    Why are we even taking this proposal seriously? It is a lie. Everyone knows it is a lie. There isn't going to be any payment regardless of who wins Congress for the next session. He is saying whatever he has to say in order to win, truth be damned. That is the entire story of Trump.

  15. chemjeff radical individualist   19 minutes ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we discover who the real vandals are of the Lincoln Reflecting Pool.

  16. chemjeff radical individualist   18 minutes ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we find all of those Haitians in Springfield who were eating cats and dogs.

  17. chemjeff radical individualist   17 minutes ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we uncover all of the Soros-paid operatives who stuffed ballot boxes for Biden in 2020.

  18. chemjeff radical individualist   15 minutes ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we accept Iran's unconditional surrender for the eleventh time.

  19. chemjeff radical individualist   13 minutes ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after the national debt is entirely eliminated, as Trump promised to do in 2016. I'm sure this will happen any day now!

  20. JesseAz (RIP CK)   11 minutes ago

    Anthropic has shared an interactive model with the public that projects how AI deployment might affect the whole economy. In the extreme scenarios, it looks like knowledge workers lose out most of all:

    Is it a hockey stick?

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   9 minutes ago

      But will the coders learn to dj?

  21. chemjeff radical individualist   10 minutes ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after prescription drug prices have fallen by 1,000%. At least! Maybe more!

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   7 minutes ago

      Zzzzzz

  22. chemjeff radical individualist   9 minutes ago

    We will receive the $5,000 check right after we discover who was in the Antifa terrorist cell who staged the Jan. 6 riots.

  23. chemjeff radical individualist   8 minutes ago

    I think you get the idea. We're not getting a check. If you actually think there is even a chance we would get a check, you are a moron. If you know that there is no chance we are getting a check but push the idea anyway, then you are deliberately deceitful.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Some Bribes, as a Treat

Liz Wolfe | 9.10.2026 9:30 AM

Court Packing Is a Bad Idea. But It's Still Constitutional.

Damon Root | 9.10.2026 7:00 AM

Can a New Weight Loss Treatment Escape the Legal and Regulatory Thicket?

Jen Basile | 9.10.2026 6:30 AM

Brickbats: October 2026

Charles Oliver and Peter Bagge | From the October 2026 issue

Brickbat: Clean Break

Charles Oliver | 9.10.2026 4:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason