Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Oil prices

Through the Red Sea

Plus: Permits for prayer, a rise in gambling, AOC's world, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 7.23.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Merchant vessels transiting the Red Sea | EUNAVFORASPIDES/X
(EUNAVFORASPIDES/X)

Oil prices surge: Yesterday, Houthi terrorists struck two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, sending oil prices up to $99 a barrel. The strikes "threatened to broaden the conflict by creating a second choke point on global shipping, in addition to the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran has effectively closed," per The New York Times.

President Donald Trump, too, is escalating: "From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by Missile, Rocket, Drone, or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy ONE BRIDGE OR POWER PLANT, including those located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran," he wrote on Truth Social. "Thank you for your attention to this matter!"

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Technically, since the Houthis are not Iran (just backed by them), and since the Saudi strike wasn't in the Strait of Hormuz but in the Red Sea, yesterday's attack probably won't warrant a U.S. bombing. But it's a very bad sign that a second shipping corridor—the Bab al-Mandab Strait—is now threatened, as this is likely to send oil prices surging even higher.

"On Tuesday, [Trump] said U.S. military forces would likely attack Iran's Pickaxe Mountain, the underground site where Israeli intelligence believes Iran has buried advanced nuclear-enrichment centrifuges, 'pretty soon,'" reports The Wall Street Journal. "Trump's threats come days after Iran launched a barrage of missile and drone attacks against U.S. bases in Jordan. Three soldiers were killed there in a strike that hit containerized housing units where the troops lived and slept. A fourth servicemember was killed last week in Iraq during a controlled detonation of unexploded ordnance from a downed Iranian drone."

People are already souring on the war: "Half of President Donald Trump's MAGA base thought Iran's war was worth its economic costs in May. Now, just a little more than a third do," reports Politico. "Additionally, 37 percent of self-identified MAGA Trump voters say the U.S. should continue its involvement only if it doesn't increase costs, up from 29 percent who said the same in May, according to the survey, conducted by independent polling firm Public First. Nearly 1 in 5 MAGA voters believe that the U.S. should end its war in Iran, regardless of the costs."

It looks likely to get much worse before it gets better.


Scenes from New York: "The Commission on Government Efficiency, which the mayor formed in January, has proposed expediting the time it takes to build new street safety projects by 33%. It's one of the five ballot questions the commission is expected to approve on Thursday that aim to speed up work by—and with—the city. The proposals will appear on voters' ballots in November," reports Gothamist. "Altogether, the commission settled on five proposals that it said will simplify the process to secure permits for outdoor dining, shorten the timeframe for the city's contracting and procurement process, fast-track projects on city-owned land whether its for a street or a building, simplify the building permit process and create targets for contributions to the city's rainy day fund to prepare for an economic downturn."


QUICK HITS

  • "Florida's fish and wildlife officials were caught using law-enforcement tools to probe everyday citizens who'd criticized the agency," writes Scott Maxwell for The Orlando Sentinel.
  • "The Supreme Court agreed last month to hear a case that asks a remarkable question: Can the government require a homeowner to obtain a permit before inviting friends to his house for prayer?" reports The Washington Post. "Grand v. City of University Heights centers on an Orthodox Jewish minyan—a prayer quorum consisting of at least 10 adult men—but the legal principles at stake extend well beyond one faith. In January 2021, Daniel Grand, an Orthodox Jewish homeowner in University Heights, Ohio, emailed roughly a dozen friends inviting them to his house for a Shabbat minyan. Soon afterward, a neighbor informed the city about Grand's email, complaining and asking the mayor to 'put a stop to this.' Under the city's zoning ordinance, 'houses of worship' require a special-use permit. Acting on the complaint, the mayor called Grand regarding what he described as an 'urgent matter.' Later that day, a city official ordered Grand to 'immediately cease and desist' using his home as a 'place of religious assembly' until he obtained the permit. Although Grand maintained that hosting a minyan in his home did not make it a house of worship, he complied. He canceled the gathering and applied for the permit the city demanded. What followed was a contentious zoning process." (They should try to get my ass, because I host bible study all the time.)
  • Back in 2018, the Supreme Court struck down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) in Murphy v. NCAA, allowing states to once again legalize sports betting. So how bad is the gambling situation now? A new paper says…very bad.

The main finding: Sports betting does not merely replace other entertainment spending. Instead, it crowds out saving and increases borrowing.

For many households, the money deposited into betting apps comes directly from their financial cushion.

— Jason Kotter (@JasonKotter) July 22, 2026

Lower-income households bet a much larger share of their income. In our data, they devote roughly 2–3x as much of their income to betting as higher-income households. That gap has widened over time. pic.twitter.com/nnbO2jOH0r

— Jason Kotter (@JasonKotter) July 22, 2026

  • I'm calling it here, and it brings me no pleasure to report, but I'm pretty sure it's AOC time:

AOC leading in NH per UNH poll

AOC 22%
Pete: 21%
Mark Kelly 9%
Newsom: 8%
Bernie: 6% (have to imagine a lot of these votes would go to AOC)
Kamala: 5%https://t.co/wZWqaWGGbs pic.twitter.com/vQUKR7y5AL

— Alex Thompson (@AlexThomp) July 22, 2026

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Homicide Rate Has Dropped to Historic Lows. Contrary to What Politicians Say, No One Really Knows Why.

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Oil pricesOilWarMiddle EastIranYemenMilitaryTerrorismTrump AdministrationPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (306)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Yesterday, Houthi terrorists struck two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea, sending oil prices up to $99 a barrel.

    We should send our environmental terrorists over to fight their islamic terrorists before we end up with an oil spill.

    1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

      Let's face it, I'm an ideas guy.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        WWGD?

        (What Would Greta Do?)

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Make an autism face?

          1. Eeyore   2 months ago

            Doesn't have to "make" it - that's resting autism face.

        2. Ajsloss   2 months ago

          Not get a haircut.

        3. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

          Go to a lord farquad lookalike contest?

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Terrorist is a bold statement by Liz. None of the other 'editors' at Reeeason would make such a claim.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

        She's basically MAGA, although like so many has had to tone it down in the workplace.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          If we can't have MALA, I will settle for MAGA.

  2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Act Blue still openly committing donation fraud.

    Meet the trailer park residents who "donate" tens of thousands to DSA members. Even without owning a computer.

    https://enjoyer.com/is-el-sayed-s-campaign-funded-by-elderly-fake-donors-actblue/

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      Great news. The report and supporting webpage make a clear case: Tax certainty matters more than temporary tax breaks.

      Oh no, but...doesn't this apply to tariffs too?

      "Manufacturing runs on long horizons — a new line or facility is planned years out. Temporary tax provisions force manufacturers to guess; permanent ones let them commit. By making these reforms permanent, H.R. 1 gave manufacturers the predictability they need to invest, hire and grow with confidence."

      "The permanence of these tax policies provides us with the certainty to continue investing in new technologies, expanding our workforce and strengthening our position as a manufacturing leader."

      https://nam.org/issues/tax/?utm

      1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

        This is supposed to be on the post below. https://reason.com/2026/07/23/through-the-red-sea/?comments=true#comment-11534791

        Not sure how I messed that up.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        Retard cant read.

        But glad to see the NAM report made him so angry he rushed to push the economy is collapsing lie like the good retard leftist he is.

        Hey qb. Did the spittle get in your eyes? Or just trusting to hide the act blue news? NAM report is not this one retard.

        What a fucking retard leftist you are.

        Pretty funny youre pretending you actually read or thought about that report in under 10 minutes though. You have your narratives. Youre good.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          OK. I deserve this. It was a stupid mistake. But now can we discuss the topic? I'll re-post my response in the appropriate place below.

          1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

            Poor QB.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      "Our violence, and graft, are speech. Your speech is, well, you assholes know the rest."

  3. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    President Donald Trump, too, is escalating: "From this point forward, any time the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz..."

    I guess it still counts as escalation if you're responding.

    1. Eeyore   2 months ago

      If we can maintain some kind of violence "balance" then maybe we can keep the war in Eastasia going forever.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      C'mon Fist, even silence has been escalating violence since 2016.

    3. JFree   2 months ago

      As someone long ago and far away once said - The stupid is strong with this one.

    4. Rick James   2 months ago

      You ought to see Reason's take on Kultur war!

  4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Poor sarcboehm. NAM has some bad news for them on manufacturing numbers.

    https://nam.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/NAM_Tax_Wins_Collection_Final.pdf

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      Repost:

      Great news. The report and supporting webpage make a clear case: Tax certainty matters more than temporary tax breaks.

      Oh no, but...doesn't this apply to tariffs too?

      "Manufacturing runs on long horizons — a new line or facility is planned years out. Temporary tax provisions force manufacturers to guess; permanent ones let them commit. By making these reforms permanent, H.R. 1 gave manufacturers the predictability they need to invest, hire and grow with confidence."

      "The permanence of these tax policies provides us with the certainty to continue investing in new technologies, expanding our workforce and strengthening our position as a manufacturing leader."

      https://nam.org/issues/tax/?utm

  5. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Technically, since the Houthis are not Iran (just backed by them)...

    Backed by = is.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Not even snark. Just the truth.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Nuke them both.

        1. Eeyore   2 months ago

          If the biblical prophecy is literal and true - Revelation 18 - that is what is going to happen.

  6. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    When you've lost The Atlantic AND Morning Joe...

    https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/07/dsa-socialist-leftist-takeover/687989/

    The DSA Is a Parasite
    The left-wing faction is hijacking the Democratic Party.

    https://www.dailymail.com/media/article-15991511/morning-joe-democratic-party-scarborough-socialists.html

    MS NOW host Joe Scarborough devoted a sizable chunk of Monday's Morning Joe to warning about the rise of Democratic Socialism within the Democratic Party.

    Scarborough, 63, said the party was at risk of alienating voters if the support continues into the next Democratic presidential race.

    'I mean, there have been some extraordinarily loony ideas coming from some of these people that have actually won races and are going to be seated in Congress, most likely,' the former Florida Republican said.

    'Like, you know, getting rid of prisons, getting rid of cops.'

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      After courting and flirting with socialists and other progressive radicals for decades, it's a little late for the establishment Democratic elitist wing to question their own lunacy.

    2. DesigNate   2 months ago

      Maybe they shouldn’t have nurtured them for nigh on 30 years. Fuck the Dems.

    3. Marshal   2 months ago

      Let's not give them too much credit. They're only criticizing because the DSA is too open about its goals which will damage Dems electorally. They don't actually oppose the DSA goals.

  7. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    AOC? LOL

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      They'll nominate her, she'll get the shit kicked out of her by JD, and the rioters will scream racism/misogyny.

      Three women in a row losing to MAGA is hilarious.

      1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

        Imagine if she gets 81 million mail-in ballots and becomes President? God knows who will be running the country.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Are we gonna have another pandemic?

          1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

            Four weeks this time.

            1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

              Just two weeks this time.

        2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          81M mail-ins = Cleanest election EVER!!!

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            No, it's gotta be 100 million magic ballots, to prove that women are better than men.

      2. damikesc   2 months ago

        I'm having doubts on JD, to be honest. Rubio might be the better option.

        1. Minadin   2 months ago

          They're both better options than AOC.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            Who would not be? Massie?

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              I really hope that's a joke. Or we might need to invent Massie Derangement Syndrome.

              1. damikesc   2 months ago

                A dude who sucked up to Ro Khanna? Yeah, I have no problem mocking him as a useless idiot.

              2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                Would massie have Ro be his VP?

                Blame AIPAC when he accomplishes nothing?

                Get to the bottom of epstein with just a few more false accusations?

                1. DesigNate   2 months ago

                  Even with all that, he’d STILL be better than her.

                  1. Zeb   2 months ago

                    This. And I don't believe all, if any, of that would happen. Everyone else can and should think what they want about Massie, but I still like him.

                    1. Nelson   2 months ago

                      I respect him more since he refused to surrender his spine or principles to MAGA. I agree with a large amount of his positions, as well. I would vote for him if he got the nomination, unless he was running against someone like Shapiro.

                      I respect Liz Cheney for her integrity as well, although I find most of her positions to be unappealing since she is a hard-core culture war conservative.

            2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              How about the members of The View as co-Presidents?

      3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Racism and misogyny (esp. against black women) are the reasons Winsome Sears didn't win!

      4. Nelson   2 months ago

        “ she'll get the shit kicked out of her by JD”

        No one’s getting the shit kicked out of them by JD Vance. The guy is pathetic.

        Marco Rubio should be a strong candidate, although being part of the Trump administration will hurt him in the general. Ron DeSantis will probably make another run, but it will be as successful as Kamala Harris’ … not at all. Gretchen Whitmer will probably run, as will Pete Buttigieg, but they will struggle with name recognition. Bernie isn’t running, not is Elizabeth Warren.

        There’s a chance that a wild card like Josh Hawley or Jim Jordan jump in, but I don’t think they’ll have much support.

      5. Rick James   2 months ago

        No, Kamala will come from behind after an 11th hour ballot drop that favors Harris at a rate of 9,000,000:1

    2. Nelson   2 months ago

      “ AOC? LOL”

      I agree. I still think the most likely (and best) nominee is Josh Shapiro. I think he would make the best President, of the candidates from either party who are ramping up for a run.

      For that matter, I think he has the potential to be the best President of the 21st Century.

      1. Square = Circle   2 months ago

        I still think the most likely (and best) nominee is Josh Shapiro.

        No. The candidate will almost certainly be someone who is not even being talked about right now.

  8. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Last month a 3 panel judge of 5th circuit judges declared illegals couldnt be held for deportation. Yesterday the full circuit said wtf, read the INA, and government now can hold illegals through deportation hearings.

    Brett Shumate

    @AAGShumate
    The full Fifth Circuit has issued an extraordinary precedential order making clear that illegal aliens do not have a constitutional right to roam free in the United States during their removal proceedings.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Can we deport those 3 judges?

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        If the republicans were worth a damn they’d start impeaching these judges.

      2. Marshal   2 months ago

        Can we deport those 3 judges?

        Only to Sweden. We have a long and glorious history of deporting to Sweden people who say they aren't from there.

  9. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "Islam is a religion of peace."

    Muslims kill 9 members of prominent pastor's family in targeted attack

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/muslims-kill-9-members-of-prominent-pastor-s-family-in-targeted-attack/ar-AA28sIcw

    James Yohanna, one of only three survivors, said that on the night of the attack, “I heard loud bangs at my brother’s door and soon after, I heard my brother scream. It turned out they were trying to break into the house but he ran outside. They shot him in the arm and leg. However, he managed to hide before the person chasing him could get close.”

    About 30 minutes later, he said, “I heard gunshots at my son’s door followed by the sound of the door being kicked open. Then I heard my son saying, ‘please don’t harm us.’ But a male voice with a Fulani accent said in Hausa, ‘today you will learn a hard lesson’ after demanding the ‘father of the house.’”

    The demand was intended to lead the gunmen to Dachomo.

    “When my son failed to answer, they shot him, shot his wife, and shot his two-month-old baby,” Yohanna said.

    “At that point I threw my six-year-old daughter through the window and followed, running aimlessly into the bush as one attacker fired several shots at me. When he lost me, he went back into the house and I tried to crawl back, but before I got 20 meters close, they went to the next room where my six daughters were sleeping and I heard automatic gunfire everywhere followed by silence,” he said.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      But pattern recognition is the most terrible thing on the planet.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        You mendacious cunt. "Pattern recognition" is fine. It is the selective creation of false patterns that is a problem, as in the above story here, when the "pattern" is selectively chosen to further narratives. If you TRULY want to know what is the "pattern" associated with certain types of crimes, you would not rely on sensational anecdotes, you would look at rigorously-derived statistics and data. You know, the type that Team MAGA routinely rejects.

        It is also a problem to use "patterns" to form bigoted judgments, as you tend to do.

        1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

          100% of Muslims follow the teachings of a known pedophile. Of course you want to defend them.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Talk about cunts. Does your TDS lead you to compulsively excuse Islam, or does that come from some other personality flaw?

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Who is responsible for the attack in the story above - the attacker, or "Islam"?

            1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

              The individual influenced by Islam.

              Do you think he just pulled "kill the infidels" out of his ass?

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                What about all of the people "influenced by Islam" who don't go around murdering the "infidels"? Is Islam to blame for their non-crimes?

                1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                  What about all the people influenced by Islam who quietly believe the same thing and admire this murderer?

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    What about all the people influenced by Islam who reject this thing and condemn this murder?

                    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                      Show me these outspoken Muslims who are condemning the violence. Bonus points for any imams who publicly condemn the violence. Extra bonus points if these imams are weren't murdered by other Muslims.

                    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Why do the Muslims who condemn this murder have to be "public"? Above, it was claimed that "quietly" supporting the murder was enough to condemn them. Why is the burden on them to prove to you that they don't fit your bigoted stereotype of them?

                    3. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                      The burden of proof is on you, because we both know there is no widespread condemnation by "peaceful" Muslims.

                      Either they agree with the violence or they fear other Muslims. Not the endorsement you'd expect from the religion of peace, is it?

                    4. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      One more time:

                      Why is the burden on them to prove to you that they don't fit your bigoted stereotype of them?

                    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                      Yeah, why should supposedly peaceful and open-minded Muslims speak out against siblings and cousins and friends that commit murder in the name of Islam? It's not like their faith--and the public acknowledgement of their faith--means anything to them. All those Hijabs are because of the recent cold weather and demands for special public accommodations are pranks.

                    6. DesigNate   2 months ago

                      “Why is the burden on them to prove to you that they don't fit your bigoted stereotype of them?”

                      I’ll remember that the next time you post something bemoaning the idea that Republicans and right-leaning libertarians “don’t publicly condemn” whatever thing it is you feel they don’t sufficiently distance themselves from.

                2. damikesc   2 months ago

                  Plenty of Nazis did not kill Jews nor seek to start a World War.

                  They were still responsible. As they should have been.

                3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                  What a stupid, dishonest question.

              2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                What about all the people who commit murder but who aren't Muslim? Does Islam have a role there too?

                1. damikesc   2 months ago

                  Is this your attempt at a "gotcha"?

                  If you wish to ignore a LOOOONG list of Islamic atrocities because, hey, not ALL Muslims commit these crimes, it is baffling how anxious you were to punish ALL Jan 6'ers for the actions of a tiny percentage of them. And to punish Trump who told all to go peacefully and protest.

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    If you're going to trot out "Islamic atrocities" throughout history, then I get to trot out "Christian atrocities". Or "white people atrocities". You are from South Carolina, no? Oh, there is a huge list of awful stuff that came out of South Carolina, most notably triggering the start of the Civil War. How much responsibility do you bear for the half million dead Americans as a result of that atrocity? Hmm?

                    1. damikesc   2 months ago

                      Feel free.

                      Care to guess which list is going to be longer?

                      SC suffered for the idiocy of starting the Civil War. Sherman put the state in its place and the misery was well-earned.

                      How, EXACTLY, have Muslims suffered for centuries of slaughtering "infidels"?

                      I find it amusing watching you white knight for a bunch of "anti-choice" bigots who happily and proudly kill LGB folks without a concern.

                    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      I'm pointing out the absurdity of your brand of identity politics. But, do carry on. I wonder how you think the list of "white people atrocities" will be less than the list of "Islamic atrocities".

                      Also, how much personal blame should you bear for starting the Civil War?

                    3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                      Do we think Lying Jeffy is actually uninformed on the history of Islam, or is he being dishonest?

                    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                      Why not both? Plus being a dick.

                    5. damikesc   2 months ago

                      "I'm pointing out the absurdity of your brand of identity politics. But, do carry on. I wonder how you think the list of "white people atrocities" will be less than the list of "Islamic atrocities"."

                      It won't be less.

                      It will be A LOT less.

                      Muslims STILL engage in slavery. Like TODAY they still engage in it. They were the backbone of it for centuries (Europeans did not kidnap slaves...they bought them their Muslim and African slavemasters). The Crusades were defensive action against centuries of Islamic violence against "infidels".

                      There is exactly zero chance the list for Islamic atrocities is LOWER. Exponentially higher, though, is the reality.

                      And how much blame do I hold for the secession? In what way am I following anything that advocates for that? If I was calling for secession and support for slavery (you, mind you, support slavery), you would have a weak argument. You have no argument.

                      It's not like Muslims are not following a faith started by a raging pedophile and have spent its existence violently slaughtering anybody who disagrees with them. The "nice moderate" ones tend to become WAY less tolerant when they get some power.

                2. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

                  c'mon jeff. we are all tribal collectivists here.

                  everything i've ever done is obviously the fault of some outside forces, not my own agency. why should muslims be any different?

                  1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                    Sadly the most honest you've ever been.

                    Jumping on the jeff bandwagon isnt a good idea if youre trying to claim youre not a retarded leftist BTW.

                    Whats with you fake deep blue city living liars pretending to be libertarian. Lol.

                3. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

                  Another stupid, dishonest question.

                  All Lying Jeffy has is dishonest bullshit.

                  1. rbike   2 months ago

                    Wow, keep it up little Jeffy. A dumbass of major proportions.

                    Answer the basic question that you won't. Where are the anti violence Islam/ Muslims?

                    If these were Christians committing crimes, we would be all over them for not adhering to the faith

                    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Dumbass, Christians commit crimes on a daily basis. Yet I never see anyone demanding that every other Christian on the planet denounce some crime that some Christian somewhere committed.

                      I will ask you the same question: Why is it their burden to prove to you that they don't conform to some stereotype in your head about them?

                    2. damikesc   2 months ago

                      "Dumbass, Christians commit crimes on a daily basis. Yet I never see anyone demanding that every other Christian on the planet denounce some crime that some Christian somewhere committed."

                      What Christians are praising God or Jesus for their crimes? Because "Allahu akbar" is not exactly an unusual thing heard during a crime committed by a Muslim.

                      If I heard a lot of "ALL GLORY BE TO JESUS" as a Christian kills somebody, you'd have an argument.

                      As traditional with you, you lack an argument.

                    3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                      “Where are the anti violence islam/muslims?”

                      Hanging out with the “group of marines” that got nazi tattoos with graham platner and didn’t know they were nazi tattoos.

                      Whatever happened to those guys? Lol.

            2. Rick James   2 months ago

              J6ers and Trump.

          2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            He loves their rape stories. Goes out of his way to defend Muslim rapists.

            1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

              He’s jealous.

        3. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          It is also a problem to use "patterns" to form bigoted judgments, as you tend to do.

          Why is this a problem? If you saw a dozen inner-city youths walking towards you on MLK Boulevard, in Any City, USA you'd be concerned. You know it and I know it. I'm just the guy who says it out loud.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            Do I really have to explain why bigotry is bad?

            Bigotry is bad because it is a collective judgment against individuals based on immutable or irrelevant group characteristics. Bigotry ignores the inherent dignity and self-worth of each individual and instead treats each individual as just as bad, or just as good, as everyone else who shares those same characteristics.

            Bigotry is fundamentally incompatible with the concept of individual responsibility. If an individual is judged according to a bigoted paradigm, that individual can never possibly show how he/she took responsibility for anything he/she did. That person is treated just as guilty, or as innocent, as everyone else in the same category regardless of their individual actions. So an immigrant who crossed the border and claimed asylum, and signed all the proper forms, and followed all the rules, and went to all of the government-mandated hearings and appointments, is treated exactly the same as the illegal immigrant thug MS-13 gangbanger who murders cute blonde coeds. That bigoted judgment ignores all of the positive steps that the first immigrant took. If you want individuals to take responsibility for their own actions, then you have to recognize those actions when they occur on their own merits, and not ignore them in a sea of bigotry.

            "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character." Do you agree with this? Oh wait, he was probably some woke Marxist commie.

            How about this one? "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." Were they a bunch of woke Marxists too?

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              Go run Bob's experiment and report back to us. Make sure to tell us how quoting MLK to your attackers helped.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                When did the Reason comment section turn into Bigots Anonymous? I guess I must have missed the memo directing the Stormfront crowd to come here.

                1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                  Once again, you cannot shame me.

                  1) Go to any city with a MLK Blvd and start walking. Please live stream the experience.

                  2) Grab a random black guy and drop him off in Hayden, ID. He will be 100% safe and likely safely driven to his intended destination.

                  Repeat the experiment 100 times. The black guy in Hayden will soon be attending BBQs, shooting guns, and riding ATVs.

                  Care to speculate what happens to you on MLK Blvd?

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    Hayden, ID

                    A suburb of Coeur d'Alene. Too perfect.

                    For those who don't know: it used to be the headquarters of Aryan Nations

                    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                      THE headquarters of the Aryan Nations? You sure about that Lying Jeffy?

                      I intentionally chose Hayden because in 30 years the reputation stain on Hayden still exists. Doesn't change the fact that black people are safe in Hayden, but white boys like you are not safe on MLK Blvd anywhere.

                    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

                      Pedojeffy: don't judge all members of a group by the actions of one member!

                      Also pedojeffy: Idaho-bob lives near the headquaters of Aryan Nations! He is a nazi!!!!

                    3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Idaho Bob isn't a bigot because he (presumably) lives near Coeur d'Alene. Idaho Bob is a bigot based on his own words and beliefs.

                  2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    1) Go to any city with a MLK Blvd and start walking. Please live stream the experience.

                    Be precise: what do you expect will happen, and why?

                    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                      It's an experiment. We'll both find out when you try it.

                    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Why do you think I won't be safe on an MLK Blvd. in any city?

                      And why do you assume that I'm white?

                    3. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                      And why do you assume that I'm white?

                      Your skin color is meaningless in this context.

                    4. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Your skin color is meaningless in this context.

                      It is? How do you know that I'm not a black guy, and when I walk down your hypothetical MLK Blvd., I'll blend right in with my homies and then we'll all go to some dark alley and rape some white women, or something?

                      Is THAT what you want me to live-stream? My homies raping white women? Man that's sick.

                    5. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                      Why do you assume your homies will be raping anyone?

                    6. DesigNate   2 months ago

                      “It is?”

                      Considering the rate of black-on-black crime, yeah skin color is pretty much meaningless on whether or not you’d be in danger.

                  3. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                    Go to any city with a MLK Blvd and start walking

                    I walk down MLK in Berkeley nearly every day, as I work right there. I've even walked down it in Oakland from time to time. Never had a problem.

                    You're just a racist, buddy.

                    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                      Berkeley demographics - White residents making up the largest single group at roughly 52%, followed by Asian (20%), Hispanic (13%), and Black (8%).

                      Berkeley's MLK is an exception to the rule.

                    2. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                      Berkeley's MLK is an exception to the rule.

                      lol

                      Now do Oakland.

                    3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      You're just a racist, buddy.

                      Of course he is. But he also says he "refuses to be shamed". And yet he just won't out and say "yeah I'm a racist, so what?" He will invent justifications like "wellllll, it's really the kultur that I have a problem with".

                    4. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Berkeley's MLK is an exception to the rule.

                      Wait wait wait, when are we allowed to consider "exceptions" to your bigoted rules?

                      You remind me of the bigots who denounce "all those other people" as being lazy worthless thugs - except for the ones that they personally know. They, of course, are the "exceptions". No dearie, they are not "exceptions", they are all just ordinary people like you and me.

                    5. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                      Lol.

                      You state this after crying about being called antisemetic for you screaming ethnic cleansing.

                      Let the full conversion happen buddy. Come out already.
                      Fucking hilarious.

                      You deserve to be in Berkely.

                    6. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                      You state this after crying about being called antisemetic for you screaming ethnic cleansing.

                      That's you who's been screaming and crying for weeks.

                      I pointed out, many weeks ago, quite calmly, that you can't create an ethno-state without ethnic cleansing, and that there's a meaningful distinction between ethnic cleansing and genocide. You screamed in response that the Palestinians deserve to be genocided, and have been screaming and sputtering and calling me an anti-semite ever since.

                      I'm not sure what you're looking for here.

                    7. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                      Let the full conversion happen buddy. Come out already.

                      I came out. Where did you go?

                      *crickets*

                  4. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

                    I've done this hundreds of times on MLK blvd in Chicago.

                    My college (Illinois tech) was about half a mile away. I would walk down MLK to shop at the grocery store. I'm white. Everyone else I saw at the grocery store and along MLK blvd was black.

                    i was never harassed, or assaulted, or scared. I did make it a point to go in the middle of the day, cause the area did get kinda sketchy at night. but everyone i met was really nice.

                    You should try this experiment yourself someday too. It might turn you into less of a racist asshole.

                    1. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                      You should try this experiment yourself someday too. It might turn you into less of a racist asshole.

                      I doubt it. Walking down a street like a normal person is one thing, walking down the street in your "I hate black people" hat and looking around at everything like you're wading through a sewer will get you some hostility.

                    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                      And now he has a I Hate Black People hat?

                      Lol

                      What the fuck happened to you?

                      What a fucking joke. Us this What screaming ethnic cleansing at gaza riots leads to?

                      You dont follow your own standards just like jeff and sarc dont.

                      Will you even admit to crime rates by race or cultural differences? Or stick to arguing about MLK Blvd and screaming racist at everyone?

                      What an unserious dumbass.

                    3. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                      And now he has a I Hate Black People hat?

                      * * *

                      Will you even admit to crime rates by race or cultural differences?

                      Never change.

                      Or stick to arguing about MLK Blvd and screaming racist at everyone?

                      Always the accusations of screaming from you, the guy who spends all day every day sputtering and raging.

                      Idaho-Bob is proudly admitting that he's a racist. He's being really open about it, which I respect a hell of a lot more than what you're doing. Why don't you just come out and say that you also don't like black people? Or, I'm sorry, that you "notice patterns."

                    4. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

                      i'll admit that there are different crime rates in every demographic, including race. and there are definitely cultural differences.

                      will you admit that everyone here that actually ran Idaho Bobs experiment just had a lovely day walking down MLK blvd?

                      Maybe you are right that Idaho Bob doesn't hate black people. He mostly just sounds really scared of them.

                    5. Square = Circle   2 months ago

                      He mostly just sounds really scared of them.

                      That's probably a more fair assessment, really, and in no small part goes hand-in-hand with a certain level of anxiety about big cities. It's easy to get the impression from media that cities like Oakland are sprawling wastelands of black people having Mad Max wars, and parts of it are like that, but Oakland is a big city with some quite lovely parts.

                      I feel like part of the perception comes the fact that I've noticed in my limited wanderings around the country that networks of small towns are like neighborhoods in a big city, where there are nice small towns and there are shitty small towns. The people in the nice small towns seem to wonder why big cities always have shitty neighborhoods in them, but I've been to some small towns that were every bit as scary as the worst parts of Oakland, but filled with white people, native Americans, Mexicans, whatever, with the main common factor being "poor and alienated."

                    6. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                      “…..the area did get kinda sketchy at night.”

                      Ah. So you’re only a racist asshole at night, tard? Or was this some kind of pattern recognition?

                    7. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Jesse is the type of guy who thinks he's "well read" because he reads The Federalist AND The New York Post.

                2. damikesc   2 months ago

                  Jesse Jackson: "There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps... then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved."

                  Noted anti-black bigot Jesse Jackson, folks.

                3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                  Is shouting "Bigot!" like shouting "Racist!"? Cuz the latter no longer means anything outside of the faculty lounge and the weekly Resistance meeting at the feminist coffee shop.

                  1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                    Square is now screaming racist after crying about being called antisemetic. It is fucking hilarious.

            2. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

              “There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps… then turn around and see somebody white and feel relieved.” -Jesse Jackson

        4. Marshal   2 months ago

          How did we know Jeffey would find the most outrageous element of the story about mass murder that someone would notice the murderers were Muslim?

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Evergreen webiste regarding this matter:

      https://thereligionofpeace.com/

    3. Nelson   2 months ago

      “ "Islam is a religion of peace."

      Muslims kill 9 members of prominent pastor's family in targeted attack”

      So, by your logic, all Catholics are child rapists and run an international pedophile ring.

      Stereotyping and religious bigotry is indefensible.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        Leftists are silly little bitches.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Half of President Donald Trump's MAGA base thought Iran's war was worth its economic costs in May. Now, just a little more than a third do...

    Make cutting and running great again.

  11. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "No widespread fraud..."

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/illegal-immigrant-top-dem-fought-to-free-turns-up-on-voter-rolls-mockery-of-our-immigration-laws/ar-AA28td8v

    Illegal immigrant top Dem fought to free turns up on voter rolls: 'Mockery of our immigration laws'

    Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal is facing scrutiny after new records showed an illegal immigrant whose release from ICE custody he championed was registered to vote in Connecticut.

    A DHS spokesperson told Fox News Digital the Biden administration released the Montenegrin national back into the United States after he returned from Serbia in 2024—even though he had been under a final deportation order since 1997.

    Cecunjanin first entered the U.S. illegally in 1997 using a fraudulent Dutch passport and was issued a final order of removal later that year. Despite that order remaining in effect for more than 25 years, he departed for Serbia in July 2024, returned about two weeks later, and was released back into the U.S. under the Biden administration before his June 20 arrest.

    Blumenthal and other Connecticut Democratic officials pushed for Cecunjanin's release last month, holding a press conference and later touting his release, crediting their letters and public advocacy.

    "His courage and faith are a lesson to all of us on this 250th national birthday. I look forward to welcoming him home. ICE seizing and detaining him was cruel and unconscionable. He was never a flight risk, or a danger to anyone," Blumenthal said in a July 3 statement celebrating the restaurant owner's release.

    "I’ll support his efforts to gain permanent legal status and more. Welcome home, Seyo," he added.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      "Cecunjanin first entered the U.S. illegally in 1997 using a fraudulent Dutch passport and was issued a final order of removal later that year. Despite that order remaining in effect for more than 25 years, he departed for Serbia in July 2024, returned about two weeks later, and was released back into the U.S. under the Biden administration before his June 20 arrest."

      But was he a soccer fan and good dad?

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      'Blumenthal and other Connecticut Democratic officials pushed for Cecunjanin's release last month, holding a press conference and later touting his release, crediting their letters and public advocacy.

      "His courage and faith are a lesson to all of us on this 250th national birthday. I look forward to welcoming him home. ICE seizing and detaining him was cruel and unconscionable. He was never a flight risk, or a danger to anyone," Blumenthal said in a July 3 statement celebrating the restaurant owner's release.

      "I’ll support his efforts to gain permanent legal status and more. Welcome home, Seyo," he added.'

      Can we now start deporting officials who abet illegal immigrants? Seriously.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Wouldn't mind flexing the law a bit...

        8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

        (a)Criminal penalties

        (1)

        (A)Any person who—

        (i)knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;

        (ii)knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;

        (iii)knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;

        (iv)encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or

        (v)

        (I)engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or
        (II)aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
        shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).

        (B)A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—

        (i)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;

        (ii)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;

        (iii)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or
        (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and

        (iv)in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or

        (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Law? Does law apply to the leftists on self-proclaimed empathy missions?

    3. Nelson   2 months ago

      "No widespread fraud..."

      Your argument is that one guy proves widespread fraud? Apparently you’re a little fuzzy on the definition of “widespread”.

  12. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    So it turns out Gov Sherril was wrong. The sw vendor was not responsible for vetting voters, jersey was. They just sent the data between two databases. Which means the elections offices were just registering illegals in violation of law.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/states/software-vendor-disputes-nj-governors-glitch-claim-says-state-approved-foreigners?utm_source=mux&utm_medium=social-media&utm_campaign=social-media-autopost

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      But the law is, like, unfair, man.

  13. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    End Wokeness
    @EndWokeness
    Mamdani is asked if he thinks laws from the "international bodies" override U.S. law

    He basically says yes

    https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/2079945880598176077

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Marxism uber alles.

  14. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Florida's fish and wildlife officials were caught using law-enforcement tools to probe everyday citizens who'd criticized the agency...

    This story has me hooked, although I wonder the true scale of the problem.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Send those guys back to school.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        You guys are just trolling now.

        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

          It’s a tough gig.

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            And fin.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              That's quite a tale.

    2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Puns aside, F&G has warrantless search power in nearly every state. They can enter your property and literally knock on your door and demand access to your freezers. Years ago, hunters thought this was a good idea because poaching was the worst thing. Now we realize F&G is political in many states, and hunting regulations are not always based on biological studies. See Oregon.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

        What puns?

        Also, there's this from just the other day:
        https://reason.com/2026/07/21/pennsylvanias-top-court-unanimously-rejects-warrantless-searches-of-private-land/
        ...and that's huge.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          Yes it is. And awesome.

  15. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Boasberg remains a piece of shit.

    Despite multiple appeals court smackdowns, continues to deny eight to jury for pro lifers arrested for protests.

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/jonathan-turley-judge-boasberg-whines-about-trumps-power-gets-caught-exceeding-his-own

    1. damikesc   2 months ago

      Until Roberts does something, we will see conservatives joining progressives in utterly loathing the courts and, inevitably, ignoring them.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        But doing something, i.e. taking a legally principled stand, is Robert's kryptonite.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          Basically. And when the courts are ignored and shown to have exactly zero power to enforce their rulings, Roberts will wonder why.

      2. Nelson   2 months ago

        “ we will see conservatives joining progressives in utterly loathing the courts”

        Conservatives have loathed the courts for most of my life. They don’t now because McConnell stole a SCOTUS seat for them, but as soon as Trump stops seating judges they’ll go right back.

        1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

          You just make shit up then type it. You also don't know what the word stole means. Oh wait, you're a leftist. You just change the meanings of words.

  16. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    State that launched a thousand ICE protests...but one anti-abortion protester holds a sign...

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/minnesota-city-sued-for-demanding-christian-preacher-pay-vendor-fee-to-hold-pro-life-sign/ar-AA28tOab

    A Minnesota municipality faces a federal civil rights lawsuit after police charged an open-air Christian preacher with criminal trespassing for standing in a public parking lot.

    The federal lawsuit, filed Tuesday by the Center for American Liberty on behalf of Bryan Conwell, accused officials of placing an unconstitutional "price tag" on free speech by forcing a peaceful speaker to buy a commercial license.

    It continues to explain that when Conwell chose to stand in a city parking lot during a farmers' market event, one that is free and open to the public, city officials and police asked that he leave or pay a $20 fee to speak. The lawsuit claims they asserted "exclusive use" of the public property.

    When Conwell refused to pay a vendor fee for non-commercial speech, police cited him for criminal trespass on July 9, and issued a second citation when he returned on July 16. Conwell now faces up to 90 days in jail and a $1,000 fine for each citation.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Same type of case Boasberg is shutting down despite appeals above. Reason has zero interest though.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        Too local or something.

        1. DesigNate   2 months ago

          Not enough violence and rioting.

    2. Nelson   2 months ago

      Let me guess. The anti-abortion crowd who claim every tiny infraction by people they don’t like makes them criminals will leap to the defense of this guy and claim it’s a ticky-tacky law (which it is) and that he shouldn’t have been ticketed (which he shouldn’t).

      Hypocrisy and dishonesty is a professional sport for anti-abortionists.

      1. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        You've gotten worse at this.

  17. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Sure, let's keep importing more of these folks...

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/migrant-accused-of-murdering-3-apartment-staffers-said-he-hated-the-american-system-cops/ar-AA28tIXx

    The crazed migrant accused of murdering three people over a petty parking-garage dispute told investigators he “hated the American system” that had thwarted him from bringing his wife and kids here from Ethiopia.

    Tsegaab Binessu was busted late Monday in Virginia, Minn., some 200 miles north of the St. Paul residences where he allegedly “executed” Nansi Fuentes Zambrano, 25, Dena Silcox, 56, and Adam Wilwerding, 43, according to a criminal complaint obtained by the St. Paul Pioneer Press.

    All three were staffers at his apartment complex where he was fighting to cancel his $65-a-month parking garage contract in the hopes of joining the Navy, the complaint said.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      There will be zero dem protests about those murders.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Assuming Democrats see those victims as American imperialists, they might actually celebrate.

  18. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The Supreme Court agreed last month to hear a case that asks a remarkable question: Can the government require a homeowner to obtain a permit before inviting friends to his house for prayer?

    Obviously this is in total violation of the First Amendment and absolutely anyone should be completely free to gather in faith as long as it's not Islam.

  19. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Democrat Senator: “Trump was right, Democrats were wrong on that.”

    https://x.com/RNCResearch/status/2079307208462844000

    Democrat Senator Peter Welch: “The fact is that we have a secure border. President Trump was right, Democrats were wrong on that.”

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Let the canceling begin!

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Did Welch join the Fetterman stroke club?

  20. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    AOC leading in NH per UNH poll...

    She will one day be sworn in as president.

    1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      Can't wait for the day we all become trillionaires.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Leading among NH Democrats? All dozen or so?

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        Sadly, it's a lot more than that. A lot of leakage from Mass. There's also some good coming from Free Staters and NHLI, etc. but overall I'd say NH is very moderate and middle of the road politically.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          That is sad.

          Are there any free states not infected with significant numbers of people who want to eliminate freedom?

    3. Nelson   2 months ago

      “ She will one day be sworn in as president.”

      Bite your tongue, FoE! Don’t even think it!

  21. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    For many households, the money deposited into betting apps comes directly from their financial cushion.

    Better to put that in the market. No betting involved there.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      May the odds be ever in your favor.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      What about money from under the cushions?

  22. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Technically, since the Houthis are not Iran (just backed by them), and since the Saudi strike wasn't in the Strait of Hormuz but in the Red Sea, yesterday's attack probably won't warrant a U.S. bombing.'

    Technically, when a belligerent nation attacks and destroys people and property conducting business in neutral territory (you know, Reason, "Free Markets"), then what is the proper response? A stern letter? Pallets of cash?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Just get used to it.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        #bigcitycharm goes global

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      The proper reason and democrat response is to give the violators of the NAP whatever they want. Then give them some more.

    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      What if there intel that there was some cocaine on the ship? That justifies firing on the ship, right?

      *double checks to make sure he's posting on the correct comment*

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Sorry about your TDS.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          No worries, it could be worse. I could be completely partisan blind...but you got used to it.

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            You are, asswipe.

    4. damikesc   2 months ago

      Just lie back and let it happen.

    5. Zeb   2 months ago

      Depends who the belligerent nation is. Your argument might persuade Russia that they should have attacked us when the US was more directly supporting Ukraine.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        I thought they attacked all our elections.

    6. mtrueman   2 months ago

      " then what is the proper response? "

      Sell more American oil and gas to Europe and Asia at higher prices. Wasn't that clear from the bombing of the Nordstream Pipeline?

    7. Nelson   2 months ago

      “ Pallets of cash?”

      Trump already tried that with Iran. It didn’t work.

  23. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    '"Half of President Donald Trump's MAGA base thought Iran's war was worth its economic costs in May. Now, just a little more than a third do," reports Politico.'

    Politico?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      They have their thumb on the pulse of MAGA in DC.

    2. JFree   2 months ago

      MAGA will soon enough realize that it is easier to start a war than to end one. And especially when you're losing.

      Then again - it is very difficult - perhaps impossible - to really beat the stupid out of these clowns.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        You should definitely go to a small town bar in flyover country and say that.

        1. JFree   2 months ago

          I live in flyover country. Once gas prices rise to the point where Trump can no longer jawbone them down, then the remaining non-stupid MAGA will finally fall away and realize they were conned by Fox/Trump/etc. Whatever remains will be the stupid. MAGA crowd here is far more unfixable stupid than small town in flyover

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            Still hiding from covid and jews huh jewfree?

      2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        Losing? lol

  24. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    "Nearly 1 in 5 MAGA voters believe that the U.S. should end its war in Iran, regardless of the costs."

    What about Libertarian voters?

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      I would imagine most principled Libertarian voters would argue that Trump should never have started the war in the first place.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Piracy is so libertarian.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      End it despite all the decades of costs.

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        It would be an truly epic fucking rug pull.

        Not exactly or really joking; Newsom appears to be the nominee, (more) allegations surface, Kamala (or AOC or whomever) gets anointed (again), 100M votes appear out of nowhere and, Nov. 8th, you pull the ships out of The Strait.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          And then pallets of cash?

          1. Nelson   2 months ago

            They already got pallets of cash from Trump. Using the ‘Obama pallet’ measurement, it was 15 pallets of cash.

            They’ll probably get another $300 billion from Trump soon to sign another MoU.

            I don’t think there will be any pallets of cash left to give by the end of the Trump Presidency.

  25. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    "Altogether, the commission settled on five proposals that it said will simplify the process to secure permits for outdoor dining, shorten the timeframe for the city's contracting and procurement process, fast-track projects on city-owned land whether its for a street or a building, simplify the building permit process and create targets for contributions to the city's rainy day fund to prepare for an economic downturn."

    But how will this accelerate opening those Mamdani-Marts?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Outdoor dining, the well known engine of economic growth.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        What sort of bug salad can I get at the Mamdani-Mart Cafe?

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      They'll be able to use more streets as open-air mosques more quickly!

    3. Marshal   2 months ago

      Notice they don't specify what they are changing. Every item is "simplify", "shorten", "fast-track", "create targets". Bureaucratese nonsense, which is exactly what I expect from a pack of numbnuts who have never held a job.

      What requirements were dropped and how does that effect the timelines? Or should we presume all they did was change the permit office policy to having it done in 120 days from the prior 180 days, both of which they will continue to miss.

  26. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    "The Supreme Court agreed last month to hear a case that asks a remarkable question: Can the government require a homeowner to obtain a permit before inviting friends to his house for prayer?"

    Does this include Church of Climatology meetings and Marxist struggle sessions?

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      If "house of worship" means whatever the property owner wants it to mean, then yes, I suppose there's no limit to how one chooses to define "worship" for one's own property. Perhaps this means we all get to declare our personal residence a "house of worship" and become exempt from property taxes?

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        The subject was permits, not taxes.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Seems neither qb nor jeff can read well this morning.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Did you check with your handlers before typing that?

      3. damikesc   2 months ago

        Impressive how you utterly miss the point of the case.

        But you do you.

  27. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Daniel Grand, an Orthodox Jewish homeowner...'

    Time to cue up the "JOOOOOOOOOOOOOZ!" call. Kinda like the futbol "GOAL!" thing, but with ultimately more concentration camps.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      You mean like this concentration camp?

      https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/480/cpsprodpb/9e1e/live/64434fa0-85f5-11f0-a26a-0f2766650bd9.jpg.webp

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        9 on the Walz scale.

        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Or a 1 on the jeff scale.

          1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

            Concentration camps you can avoid by being paid to go home and a free plane ride are the worst.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              Here is more information about the "free plane ride" program.

              https://www.nilc.org/resources/know-your-rights-cbp-home/

              Bottom line:
              - It doesn't apply to everyone, only a small number of undocumented migrants
              - The government may or may not honor its commitment to pay the bonus
              - The migrant might still be arrested by ICE anyway

              So it's not a huge surprise why only a small number of people have even tried to take advantage of this program.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                Well, then, if illegals don't get to fly business class and take home at least $100k, then "justice" requires that we give them a house and a voter ID card.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  Yes we know, the government reneging on its promise of any "reward" for choosing to flying home, is exactly the same as the migrant demanding business-class seats and a $100k reward.

                  Tell us: if the government promises to pay $1000 to a migrant for choosing to fly home, but then doesn't hold up its end of the bargain and the migrant doesn't get paid, would you consider that to be a good thing or a bad thing? If you think it's a good thing, do you think that might explain why so many people are unlikely to take advantage of this "reward" when it is essentially a false promise?

                  1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                    I guess you also don't approve of LE sting operations, where they nab bunches of criminals by promising free shit at a special gathering.

                    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Oh, I see! So you view the whole "CBP Home" thing as just an ICE sting operation. Well, then why don't you tell that to Spiritus Mundi, who seems to think that the reward is legit and it's just the fault of those stupid migrants for not taking the government up on their "reward".

                      You can't really have it both ways: condemn the migrants for not trusting the government in their promise of a reward, and then treating the reward itself as a false promise.

                    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                      No Jeff. I support the mission to deport people who have no legal residence status and don't give a shit if they trust the LE agencies or the process.

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  In fact, one might argue that the government deliberately created this situation - they deliberately created a promise they had no intention to keep, because what they really wanted was to create talking points to dupe the ignorant into thinking "those illegals aren't even taking free money to go home, they must be really bad hombres!"

                3. Rick James   2 months ago

                  house and a voter ID card.

                  Why would they need a voter ID card?

              2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

                Working at the intersection of immigrant, economic, and racial justice...

                Left wing open borders advocacy group. Poor pedojeffy.

              3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

                Record number of immigration cases now ending in voluntary departure, report says

                Poor pedojeffy

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  You dumbass, "voluntary departure" has always been an option, even before Trump. You would know this if you actually read the article I cited above. What has changed is the "financial incentive" that Trump wants to offer them to leave voluntarily. They promise a certain figure but in many cases that turns out to be a false promise.

                  1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

                    So people have always chose to go to 'concentration' camps. Glad you admit that pedo.

                    And your 'article' is 100% activist propo.

                  2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                    Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, jeff.

                    Lol. Idiot.

        2. damikesc   2 months ago

          I dunno. After pardoning a pedo rapist and making an asinine "Can't judge somebody on their worst day", the Walz scale might need some rejiggering. Not sure anybody can hit above an 8 when compared to this dunce.

          And the Dems wanted THIS ass clown to be VP.

      2. DesigNate   2 months ago

        There’s a massive difference between concentration camps and detention facilities for illegal immigrants.

        You should really try not being a disingenuous twat.

  28. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Just...ugh...

    "USA Today writer says Caitlin Clark puts Black and queer WNBA players in danger by flopping"

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/basketball/usa-today-writer-says-caitlin-clark-puts-black-and-queer-wnba-players-in-danger-by-flopping/ar-AA28wbuR

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      This is what happens when you let the retards out of the special ed room, and put them in charge of the school--and the school paper.

    2. Nelson   2 months ago

      If flopping is that dangerous to players, most of the soccer players in the world would be dead.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        No. Just the black and queer players.

        Way to miss the point though. Lol.

  29. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Posted this last night but it deserves a broader reach, it is such a great article.

    https://prospect.org/2026/07/22/proportional-representation-gets-a-new-look-election-reform-voting-rights-act-gerrymandering-redistricting/

    “The way to end the redistricting wars,” the new letter says, “is to make redistricting matter far less.”

    Personally I would be in favor of a type of 'grand bargain' when it comes to elections - if you want federal standards for voter ID, fine, but it has to be accompanied by other reforms as well. One of those reforms must be to reform the composition of the House of Representatives.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Making the apportionment of the House be based on citizens?

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        If you want to go down that route - sure, we can consider that as a part of the "grand bargain". But I would also insist on some other changes. For example, increasing the size of the House, and/or some form of proportional representation as discussed in the article above.

        1. damikesc   2 months ago

          How about fuck you?

          That works well for me.

        2. DesigNate   2 months ago

          “If you want to go down that route”

          That’s the route laid out in the Constitution. Also, expand the fuck out of the House to meet Constitutional Apportionment.

          1. Horatio Cornblower   2 months ago

            ...expand the fuck out of the House to meet Constitutional Apportionment.

            This

          2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            I can agree with that. As a part of a larger set of reforms.

    2. Marshal   2 months ago

      Personally I would be in favor of a type of 'grand bargain' when it comes to elections

      Left wingers love grand bargains because they have no intention of delivering on their end as we saw in immigration. Even if it were agreed they would enact their desired changes but then use the courts and bureaucratic control to prevent voter ID from ever being enacted.

  30. Ajsloss   2 months ago

    (They should try to get my ass, because I host bible study all the time.)

    Adorable that you think the pinkos running your city won't do exactly that.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      I'm a bit confused on how exactly a wake, or the reception, doesn't clearly violate this with only the abjectly inhumane ghoulishness and subsequent righteous social exorcism keeping the demons living in the neighborhood at bay.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Let me help. Are the people gathered more (D) or (R)?

        1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          If they're a lot of M's they're allowed to simply prostrate themselves in the street five times per day. Traffic be damned. Any street or walkway can become an open-air mosque. And once allowed to pray there one time, it's theirs forever.

      2. Zeb   2 months ago

        My guess would be that the difference is that a wake is a one time thing, but regular prayer group meeings changes it from a singular event to a regular thing. Which is still bullshit. I can have a party every weekend if I want. A prayer group is no different, except quieter.

        1. mad.casual   2 months ago

          Not disagreeing with you exactly, but that's opposite side of the same coin.

          I hold a "quiet party" or cocktail hour with communion wine and nobody knows it's secretly a prayer group. Rotate through the members like a regular "book club" or "girls night", same difference.

          A bunch of people gather around a dead body and it's rather unequivocally either a (potential) crime scene or a religious rite.

          1. Rick James   2 months ago

            Or a Biden admin joint-Chiefs meeting.

            *rimshot*

            What? The jokes don't come with a roadmap.

  31. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "Lower-income households bet a much larger share of their income. In our data, they devote roughly 2–3x as much of their income to betting as higher-income households"

    And yet when people say that there's self-inflicted reasons why some poor people remain poor, they get excoriated for it and told it's Elon Musk's fault.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      No, it is when you and your team pretend that poverty is purely a moral problem. That what every poor person needs is just bigger bootstraps and a stern lecture.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Uh, sure. Because fairness and justice and equity require that wise experts protect people from themselves.

        Why the fuck do you even pretend to support libertarianism?

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Why do you think "libertarianism" means "every social problem can be solved with sufficient moral scolding"?

          I am in favor of meeting people where they are, and understanding their particular circumstances, so that if a person does need help, it is the right kind of help that is likely to do the most good for that person. I guess the term for this that you all use now is "toxic empathy", right? We should just ignore what people are going through and design a one-size-fits-all program of moral condemnation to solve every problem?

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            Are you projecting again? Because I suspect you naturally consider scolding people you don't approve of.

            How about MYOB and just grant people autonomy--and personal responsibility?

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              grant people autonomy--and personal responsibility?

              I am in favor of this. Are you? A one-size-fits-all program of moral scolding doesn't do this, it demands that people "take responsibility" for things that they may not even be responsible for.

              Meeting people where they are IS granting people autonomy because it recognizes their individual situations and conditions. It recognizes their individual dignity and self-worth. Are you really in favor of that?

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                Oh, so now "scolding" is a level of speech under scrutiny? How about people can say whatever they want, regardless of any resting sadness?

                Again, stop pretending to support libertarian ideals.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  People CAN say whatever they want, including me who chooses to "scrutinize" your scolding speech. *I* can say whatever I want too, pal.

                  Libertarians respect human dignity. Do you? I get the distinct impression that frankly you hate most humans.

                  1. Zeb   2 months ago

                    The problem with "dignity" is that everyone thinks it means something different. I prefer to sticking to "human freedom and autonomy" when it comes to what libertarians should respect.

                    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                      Everyone has a broad idea of what it means: to be a living human being means that one is entitled to a basic minimum standard of treatment. Of course we can all argue about the fine details of that standard. But 99% of us would agree that things like torture and intentional starvation are right out. And I would hope, although my hope diminishes on a daily basis, that things like "respecting the agency of each individual to make his/her choices about his/her own life" would also be on the list.

                  2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                    No, I hate humans who think that their "concern" for other humans justifies trying to fix their lives through coercion and control.

        2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          Because he's a steaming pile of lying TDS-addled shit.

        3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

          Remember. Jeff once called himself a libertarian socialist. He doesnt know what libertarian means.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            I never called myself a "libertarian socialist". I merely pointed out that such a thing existed.

            I am not a libertarian socialist.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              Well, not the libertarian part.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      It would be way more efficient to just transfer Elon's wealth to polymarket, fanduel, and draftkings (less diverted to InBev, Phillip-Morris, and Frito-Lay), but somehow, I don't think that would scratch their righteous socialist itch.

  32. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    List is really longer...

    Second degree trespass.
    Carrying a concealed gun.
    Shooting a firearm in a city.
    Driving while intoxicated.
    Resisting a public officer.
    Driving while intoxicated, again.
    Probation violations.
    Reckless driving.

    https://x.com/NRSC/status/2080014276396191863

    ROY COOPER'S WORST OF THE WORST WEDNESDAY

    Meet Humberto Narvaez Sandoval, a criminal illegal from Nicaragua arrested in Winston-Salem, North Carolina for burglary and forced entry into a residence.

    Thanks to Roy Cooper turning North Carolina into a sanctuary state, Sandoval was never turned over to ICE and allowed to wreak havoc despite several arrests for crimes such as:

    -Carrying a concealed gun
    -Shooting a firearm in a city
    -Driving while intoxicated (twice)
    -Reckless driving

    Sandoval was finally arrested by ICE after Roy Cooper left office.

    Sandoval should have been immediately deported after his first crime, but Roy Cooper's soft-on-crime, sanctuary policies allowed him to roam free and cause mayhem in North Carolina.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Deport Cooper, too.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Worst of the worst was the illegal from Mexico who raped and killed a 2 year old.

      1. damikesc   2 months ago

        And Virginia under whatever that bitch's name is PROTECTED him with their sanctuary policies.

        Illegals --- raping the 2 yr olds Americans won't.

      2. mad.casual   2 months ago

        I'm still kinda hung up on "Mom's boyfriend" of the 10 yr. old girl who had to travel from Ohio to Indiana for an abortion and the first any/everybody heard about it was from Joe Biden's lips.

        Kyle Rittenhouse has to go through due process for defending himself, but we are (were) supposed to write US law to enshrine baby murder as a right because her illegal-alien-mom's-boyfriend-pedophile-rapist was under US jurisdiction... and she was born here.

        I admit there are many subtle layers of "worst" on this issue.

      3. Nelson   2 months ago

        Was he a priest?

      4. Rick James   2 months ago

        raped and killed a 2 year old.

        Did she turn up pregnant at an abortion clinic 15 minutes across the Ohio border?

  33. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Forget tariffs, this is a potential gold mine! So far, the Trump administration has collected about $1.2 billion in payments from the final removal orders fines.

    https://www.themarshallproject.org/2026/06/20/money-dhs-immigrant-fines

    How Government Fines of $1 Million+ Are Increasingly Targeting Immigrants
    A 1996 law allowing fines for some immigrants was rarely used — until Donald Trump’s second term began.

    First came the fines: Last year, the Trump administration began aggressively fining immigrants who allegedly stayed in the country past a deportation order. The law allowing these fines had been on the books since 1996, but was rarely used before 2025 — and the original fines were much lower.As of May, the federal government had issued more than 65,000 fines to immigrants who reportedly have deportation orders but who remain in the U.S., seeking more than $36 billion in total. Some of the individual fines are as high as $1.8 million — $998 per day for the statutory maximum of five years. The Department of Homeland Security also reduced the number of days’ notice that immigrants receive under the federal rule before collection efforts can begin, providing only a window of 15 business days to contest the fine.After the fines came the lawsuits: The Department of Justice began filing civil lawsuits in federal court against a handful of the immigrants who had received fine notices but had not yet paid. It started last September as a small trickle of cases in federal court districts from California to Florida. By May, a Bloomberg Law analysis had identified more than 50 lawsuits, some demanding more than $1 million. Essentially, the government is seeking a court-ordered financial judgment against these individuals, which it could then use to seize assets, garnish wages and intercept tax refunds.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Pays for .005% of the costs of one year.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Facetious on the "gold-mine" part, but notable on the potential impact pushing for self-deportation.

  34. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "The money is just obscene: Inside Mayor Lurie's funding machine reshaping SF politics"
    [...]
    "It was the day after the June election, and the political operatives who helped San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie steamroll his opponents were exultant.
    Voters had just delivered resounding victories for Lurie's agenda, electing both candidates he endorsed to the Board of Supervisors and passing every ballot measure he favored.
    Consultants for the pro-Lurie political action committee, SF Believes, had raised about $1.8 million, largely from people with backgrounds in finance or technology. Many contributors also had longstanding ties to the mayor. Their continued investment in Lurie's political ambitions had paid off, the consultants wrote in an email obtained by the Chronicle.
    "SF Believes had a huge impact on all of these races, providing the resources needed for voters to get to know candidates with very little name recognition and communicate the stakes of important ballot measures," the email said. "The most effective message in these races … was simple: Mayor Lurie supports these candidates and these positions because they will keep San Francisco moving forward."..."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/the-money-is-just-obscene-inside-mayor-lurie-s-funding-machine-reshaping-sf-politics/ar-AA28tw4f?ocid=BingNewsSerp

    The HORROR! A 'moderate' SF politico raising private money to support other 'moderates'!!!!!!!

  35. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Every R and one I voted to pass it, almost all Ds voted against it. Nancy Pelosi made no statement that I'm aware of.

    https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/22/politics/stock-trading-restriction-congress

    The House narrowly passed a bill to add new restrictions on lawmakers trading stocks after a partisan dispute resulted in a narrower proposal that stops short of an outright ban.

    The bill passed 232 to 198 on Wednesday, with only 13 Democrats joining Republicans in support. It is unclear when or if it will be taken up in the Senate.

    The measure prevents lawmakers, their spouses, and dependent children from buying new stocks of publicly traded companies while serving in Congress, which adds a new restriction on a highly controversial practice.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Congratulations, the Team Red strategy worked on you. You are helpfully pushing the narrative that they want you to push, "Dems don't want a ban on stock trades".

      In reality, this is what happened (from your own article):

      In the days leading up to the vote, a separate voter ID measure that would also add new restrictions on mail-in voting was added to the bill, further complicating the push to pass the bill.

      While the bill – led by Bryan Steil, the GOP chairman of the House Administration Committee – adds more constraints on lawmaker stock trading than what exists under the current law, most Democrats opposed it, saying it did not go far enough to end the practice and they disapproved of the Republican decision to attach changes to voting measures to the legislation.

      So Team Red played procedural games with it in order to create talking points. Do you ever feel bad for being continually played by their propaganda machine?

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Dems don't want restrictions on mail-in voting OR restrictions on congress trading stocks?

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          most Democrats opposed it, saying it did not go far enough to end the practice

          Is that clear enough for you?

          You know, acknowledging what their honest position is on an issue is not the same as supporting them or their party, right?

  36. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Half of President Donald Trump's MAGA base thought Iran's war was worth its economic costs in May. Now, just a little more than a third do,

    TDS is a now a pandemic. Time to stop the spread by shutting down for two weeks.

  37. JFree   2 months ago

    But it's a very bad sign that a second shipping corridor—the Bab al-Mandab Strait—is now threatened, as this is likely to send oil prices surging even higher.

    Golly. Who on Earth could have believed this would happen? How did they fail to inform the Great Pumpkin beforehand?

    1. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

      Sad you cheer for terrorists.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      "...How did they fail to inform the Great Pumpkin beforehand?..."

      This is what passes for 'clever repartee' to asswipes like JFucked.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Do you get paid in Yemeni Rials or Iranian?

  38. Neutral not Neutered   2 months ago

    Regional militaries have been fighting and prepping for a larger war in Yemen for many years.

    Not sure why Saudi has not steeped up to remove Houthis.

    Why did the world just let the Houthis overthrow the gov and take control in Yemen without a word or reaction was bad enough. But for no actions against Houthis since has been the issue.

    Don't let this stand. Yemen deserves to be freed from the Houthis and so does Saudi and Israel.

    It is a given. Easy to understand. IRGC, Hezz, Houthis and Hamas all need to be removed.

    We pay the price now or a far worse one later.

    1. mtrueman   2 months ago

      "Easy to understand. IRGC, Hezz, Houthis and Hamas all need to be removed. "

      Easy to solve. Just replace them with Christians and Jews.

    2. JFree   2 months ago

      Don't let this stand.

      I agree. I look forward to your new substack - I was a volunteer fighting Houthis in Yemen. Maybe you can assemble those dispatches into a book - The Sana'a Also Rises

    3. Nelson   2 months ago

      “ Don't let this stand”

      Are you advocating for us participating in a Middle East ground war?

  39. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

    Leave it to Bund Deutscher Madel Lizard here and the Orange Hitler she voted for to make even AOC look relatively sane and preferable by comparison.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Leave it to you to make Rachel Maddow relatively sane and preferable by comparison.

  40. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Lower-income households bet a much larger share of their income. In our data, they devote roughly 2–3x as much of their income to betting as higher-income households."

    Hmmm. People who don't make much don't manage what they have well! Surprise, surprise!

    1. Agammamon   2 months ago

      Also, if you're income is mostly 'free' welfare - then why would you care to manage it carefully?

  41. Marshal   2 months ago

    I'm calling it here, and it brings me no pleasure to report, but I'm pretty sure it's AOC time:

    Presidential Nominee Howard Dean is calling.

  42. Agammamon   2 months ago

    Next year we'll get the Reason articles on why they are 'reluctantly, but strategically' voting for Cortez.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Why Did a California County Fine Them Over $1 Million for Someone Else's Code Violations?

Billy Binion | 9.20.2026 7:00 AM

AI Companies Promise Humanoid Assistants. How Will the Robots Know What To Do?

Meagan O'Rourke | From the October 2026 issue

Customs and Border Protection Doesn't Deny Using Facial Recognition To Target Foreign OnlyFans Models

Josef Burton | 9.19.2026 8:00 AM

Cancer Vaccines, Anti-Aging Treatments, and 5 Other Exciting Biomedical Advances

Ronald Bailey | From the October 2026 issue

Montana's Anti-Deepfakes Law Just Hit a First Amendment Roadblock

Reem Ibrahim | 9.18.2026 5:36 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason