Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Democratic Party

Graham Platner Dropped Out, but His Shadow Lingers Over Democrats and U.S. Politics

Democrats passed over the opportunity to be the sane party in favor of bad people and worse ideas.

J.D. Tuccille | 7.10.2026 8:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Graham Platner | Troy R. Bennett/ZUMA Press/Newscom
(Troy R. Bennett/ZUMA Press/Newscom)

There was a time, not long ago, when Democrats could have branded their organization as the sane party. With Republicans moving in a sharply nationalist/populist direction that looked more over time like a cult of personality for Donald J. Trump, there was an opening for the donkey party to offer refuge to normies. All Democrats had to do was hold the ground against crazy.

They didn't rise to the moment.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Platner Was Obviously a Bad Person Long Before the Latest Revelation

Instead, Democrats told the country to hold their beer while they embraced socialism, antisemitism, and hostility to western civilization. Inevitably, we arrived at a moment when they eagerly supported Graham Platner through his Nazi tattoo, self-described communism, attacks on Jews and Israel, and abusive behavior towards women, not to mention his phony posturing as a working-class hero. They are finally drawing the line at allegations by an ex-girlfriend that he forced his way into her home and raped her.

At least they still have standards. Of a sort. If only Platner was the full extent of the problem.

I wrote last month that Platner is a symptom of "a movement that seemingly holds ideological lunacy as its highest value." All can be forgiven by the rising force of progressives so long as a candidate voices sufficiently radical ideas—all can be forgiven, that is, except unelectability. Platner's train wreck of a life was no problem so long as Democratic primary voters seemed in a forgiving mood; once the horrifying revelations threatened to alienate the public, his support was cut off.

Progressive Democrats Embrace Platner's Bad Ideas, Minus Felony Allegations

But if Platner is out, the Democratic Party's rejection of sanity continues. High-profile New York congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier has also endorsed communism, while Seattle Mayor Katie Wilson sticks with garden-variety socialism, like New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, and Washington, D.C.'s presumptive new Mayor Janeese Lewis George and her city council allies. The same is true of a wave of progressive primary winners running as Democrats in upcoming mid-term elections.

Most of these left-wing candidates and officeholders are formally affiliated with or at least supported by Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), the not-a-party that's rapidly displacing old-fashioned Democrats and wearing their organization like a skin suit. Despite its name, though, the DSA doesn't really offer a democracy-friendly alternative to totalitarian brands of socialism.

Jonathan Chait wrote last week for The Atlantic, "In 2025, the group's convention voted to officially remove its founding language allowing for the expulsion of members who worked for communist cells, and added a provision calling the Palestinian 'right to resistance' a central tenet of the DSA." He added that the DSA is run by far-left factions that "have realigned the organization in firm opposition to liberal democracy."

A key—even mandatory—part of modern progressives' ideology is hostility to Israel and its American supporters that is largely an overt rebranding of old-school antisemitism as antizionism.

"For many Jewish Democrats, the Democratic Party is just the latest institution that welcomed us and is turning hostile," Democratic strategist Howard Wolfson told Axios.

It's also turning hostile to the U.S. Chevalier once commented online that "I forgot to get napkins so I just wiped my hand on the American flag behind me." That was after founding a group calling for "total eradication of Western civilization." Mamdani gave an Independence Day address that described his city as one of "contradictions within a nation of contradictions. We see the wealthiest country in the history of the world—one where children go to sleep hungry while the world's first trillionaire hungers for more. We see monopolies that dominate every industry and oligarchs who buy elections." That dim view of the United States permeates progressive/DSA thinking.

But, on the plus side, most of these politicians have avoided allegations of home invasions and rape.

Moderate Democratic Pushback May Be Coming Too Late

Some normie Democrats are alarmed by the radical drift of their party. A group of House Democrats put together a "Promise to America" group promising to bring "common sense back to the Democratic Party." They say, "we are capitalist, not socialist," and that "we are proud, not ashamed of America."

But, a group of elected officials trying to reclaim one of the two major political parties from socialists who are ashamed of America suggests that maybe they've waited a bit too long. Recent YouGov polling finds that, among supporters of the two major parties and independents, Democrats are the only group that favors socialism over capitalism. Sixty-two percent of Democrats say they would vote for democratic socialists, compared to 24 percent of independents and 3 percent of Republicans. And Democrats aren't exactly proud to be American, according to Gallup polling.

Two Parties With a Shared Aversion to Sanity

So, the Democratic Party passed on its chance to be the sane party. That's unfortunate because the other major contender is still consumed by the populism, nationalism, and Trump idolatry that has marked it for a decade since it stopped being a generally conservative party and morphed into a vehicle for the ambitions of one man.

President Trump, of course, has his own messy life to contend with, including a civil judgement finding him liable for sexual misconduct. He's joined by such Republicans as Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who agreed to pay $300,000 to settle securities fraud charges and is running for the U.S. Senate as a Trump favorite.

Ideologically, the GOP now represents the president's latest whims more than consistent ideas, though Vice President J.D. Vance, a likely heir to Trump, is openly hostile to free markets.

That said, the cult-of-personality Republican Party may actually be the less crazy of the two major parties at the moment, though that's not saying much. If the Democrats remain on their current path, perhaps Trump's exit from politics in 2029 will create an opportunity for the GOP to offer itself as the sane option by comparison to the party of socialism, antisemitism, and hostility to the U.S.

But I wouldn't hold out hope for that eventuality. If the last decade has demonstrated anything, it's that America's politicians see their enemies' radicalism and stupidity as opportunities to venture further towards the fringes themselves. Graham Platner may be on his way out, but his shadow lingers over a rotten political culture that is infested with bad people who endorse terrible ideas.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Review: A Chaotic History Podcast for People Who Don't Care About Historical Accuracy

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Democratic PartyElection 2026Campaigns/ElectionsMidtermSocialismSenateMainePolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (162)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

    Wait, you think the party that cannot tell what a woman is was sane? The party that prioritizes criminals over their victims or society and has embraced Marxism fully is your idea of same policy? You've fully lost the plot.

    1. TJJ2000   2 months ago

      ^THIS. Well Said +10000000000.

    2. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

      You mean ... like this?

      So, the Democratic Party passed on its chance to be the sane party.

      Seems quite contrary to what you wrote:

      Wait, you think the party that cannot tell what a woman is was sane? The party that prioritizes criminals over their victims or society and has embraced Marxism fully is your idea of same policy?

      Perhaps you need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills. They're kinda lacking.

      1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

        Perhaps you need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills. They're kinda lacking.

        As do you. Is Platner the tipping point between sane and insane? Or were there many more examples, prior to the Dems choosing Platner as their candidate, that would have been opportunities for choosing a saner option as a party?

        Be more critical in your own reading before criticizing another's.

        1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

          You think changing the subject hides your idiocy? He claimed the author wrote something when the author wrote the opposite.

          1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

            No you gibbering retard, I was pointing out that the Democrat party had long ago abandoned sane and not that this was some crucial nexus for the party direction but just more of the same.

            1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

              That has nothing to do with misreading what was written, you retarding gibbon.

              1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

                You're right. His comment has nothing to do with how you misread and interpreted it in your head.

                1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

                  Show me what I misread. You can't, because I didn't.

                  1. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

                    His comment. And you've already shown us. Thank you.

              2. Sylvie1   2 months ago

                He has explained it cogently. The article reads as if Democrats' departure from sanity is a recent vintage, when it's quite well aged, and that shark jumped long since.

          2. Agammamon   2 months ago

            Tucille thinks they were sane until this point.

            The DSA bullshit is where he thinks they fell into the abyss. He was fine with everything before that.

            1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

              No he does not. You cannot read either.

              I wrote last month that Platner is a symptom of "a movement that seemingly holds ideological lunacy as its highest value." All can be forgiven by the rising force of progressives so long as a candidate voices sufficiently radical ideas—all can be forgiven, that is, except unelectability.

              But if Platner is out, the Democratic Party's rejection of sanity continues.

              1. Agammamon   2 months ago

                Uhm, he has been supporting a decent amount of Democrat policies - until everyone suddenly decided Platner was cancer.

                Open border, unrestricted immigration, globalism - all that was fine until this week when suddenly Platner is un-personed.

              2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                The democrat party hit their tipping point many years ago. That’s what everyone is trying to get into your thick head. And Reason is a part of that problem.

                It’s pretty fucking obvious and uncomplicated. So what part of this aren’t you getting?

                1. epsilon given   1 month ago

                  To be fair, Reason is very likely a false flag operation that is trying to convince libertarians and liberty-minded Republicans from not voting, or if possible, to vote Democrat.

                  It's the only explanation I have for the articles and the predictable support for Democrat candidates they have had over the years.

          3. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 months ago

            Changing the subject? God you are truly bad at the thing 'comprehension' you claim to be so good at. And you devolve to insult as well. Good argument.

            There is no 'claim' about what the author wrote in his assertion you boob. There are references to other things the crazy Dems have done as examples of forgoing sanity long before this guy Platner showed up.

            Go back to the Round-up and tilt at your windmills over there.

            The others in the comments got his point quite easily it appears.

          4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            He didn’t change the subject.

        2. charliehall   2 months ago

          Janet Mills was the single most hostile governor to Trump. That voters considered her inadequate to counter Trump does show that at least in Maine, the Democrats have gone off the deep end.

          I am a Democrat. And I sent Collins a contribution hours after Mills suspended her campaign.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Ok, now what about NYC?

          2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            You're a fucking lying plie of TDS-addled lefty shit. Get reamed with a barb-wire-wrapped baseball bat.

        3. charliehall   1 month ago

          The problem is that Platner IS sane.

    3. James K. Polk   2 months ago

      He thinks that your reading comprehension is weak. He is correct.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        That's because you're a cultist retard and he's just incorrect.

        1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

          Yet you still can't point out where I was wrong. He misread the article. That's what my comment pointed out. You changed the subject and responded to something I did not write. It's known as a strawman.

          1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

            “He” is the guy you are responding to that wrote the original comment. Above, you are arguing with someone who apparently you think wrote it.

            Your reading comprehension is indeed shit.

            If everyone you meet seems like asshole, maybe it’s not them, it’s you

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              On here it's probably all of the above.

              1. DesigNate   2 months ago

                Ouch.

                (But probably accurate)

    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      Lol. Yup, all they had to do was reject platner to be sane.

  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    The lust for power caused all this.

  3. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    This post might have made sense 12 years ago, but not now. The Ds are a normal party, far from perfect, but normal. The Rs have been taken over by the MAGAs, who are racist, homophobic, xenophobic, and fascist. They are cheering the rapid decline of the US both domestically and internationally. They are happily pissing away everything that made America great.

    1. James K. Polk   2 months ago

      You think the D's are the normal party because you are insane in the same way they are. You are a dumb, authoritarian progressive who loves censorship and executive overreach when your guys are doing it.

      1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        12 years ago is when they went on the rocket ride to crazytown. He thinks that the D Party of old wasn’t normal, and the DSAs are

    2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      Open Borders Uber Alles, Don’t Deport Criminals, Drag Queen Story Hour, No Guardrails on Voting Whatsoever, Dismantle Whiteness, Chicks with Dicks in Every Lockerroom, Seize Private Property, Critical Deconstruction of Everything, $30 Mimimum Wage, Free Everything except Speech, Government Run Grocery Stores, Shout your Abortion, oh, and 3/4 of us hate America.
      Very normal and sane.

      1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

        But God forbid you oppose any of this horseshit, you're part of a "cult of personality".

        Meanwhile, the democrats' ratchet into the sewer continues apace.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          They should be in cages out down. Enough was enough a decade ago.

          It’s time to clean house.

      2. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

        Open Borders Uber Alles, Don’t Deport Criminals, Drag Queen Story Hour, No Guardrails on Voting

        These are also the preferences of the Reason libertarians.

        1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

          Liberteen Reeeeeson

        2. ungulant   2 months ago

          It's amazing that a propaganda guzzler such as yourself even found this website.

    3. Zeb   2 months ago

      Sadly, when looking at the rest of the 1st world, you are probably right that Democrats are normal. Looking at Europe and other places that are further down the lefty insanity hole than we are, I don't want that kind of normal.

    4. Rick James   2 months ago

      The Ds are a normal party, far from perfect, but normal.

      What did I tell you guys? DSA is center left, even slightly right of center left. Change my mind.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Either way, they need to go away, forever.

    5. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      ""The Ds are a normal party""

      You can smoke crack while in office. In the office.

      1. MK Ultra   2 months ago

        "Goddamn bitch set me up." -ghost of Marion Barry

    6. charliehall   2 months ago

      Dems in Maine, in parts of New York City, and in Denver are no longer sane. Do you not realize how horrible Platner and Chevalier are? They are every bit as bad as MAGA except that that wing of the Democratic Party has little power today.

    7. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

      "The Ds are a normal party, far from perfect, but normal."

      How I wish you were trolling but unfortunately you seem sincere.

      Got news for ye, but extreme positions generally will engender extreme responses. Hence the rise of the DSA and other moronic, lefty positions to counter the increasingly extreme right. Think of it as a giant pendulum: the farther it swings one direction, the equally-distant it swings back the other way.

      If you actually think "your" party stays normal while the other goes down flames, you're either a clueless optimist or a relative (spouse?) of the party leader.

      1. epsilon given   1 month ago

        I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but Republicans, especially under President Trump, aren't particularly "extreme right". If anything, they tend to be what Democrats said they were from 10 or even 15 years ago.

        I emphasize said because they have always been the Party of the Confederacy, the Party of the KKK, the Party of Hitler and Lenin and Stalin and Mao and Castro -- they have merely been mostly good at keeping their true selves hidden.

        But when Hillary lost the Presidency, the masks came off.

        Democrats didn't go insane because of some "pendulum" swinging back and forth. They went insane because they have been carefully marching through the Institutions, and were on the cusp of complete control with Hillary about to be crowned President, when an uppity businessman tipped over their apple cart and took their sweet victory away.

        Ever since then, Democrats, Media, and the Deep State have been fighting President Trump tooth and nail. Ironically enough, had the Democrats been willing to work with President Trump in the first year of his first term, as they have with previous Republican Presidents, they could have ratcheted their grip on power a little more, and could have certainly cinched it within another Presidential Election or two -- instead, they made President Trump a demon, and tried to destroy him.

        They then cheated him his first re-election bid, and tried to destroy him further, motivating him to plot his revenge and to run again -- and then, after he ran, he came in with a vengeance, dismantling and humiliating the very organizations that tried to destroy him.

        President Trump hasn't been as ruthless as he needs to be, yet he's been far more successful than I would have ever expected him to be in his second term -- in some ways, I consider it his third term, because without the horrors of the Pretendent Biden years, I don't think he would have come back swinging so hard. He's done some serious house cleaning. Not nearly enough, to be sure, but he's had a good start, and hopefully successors will be able to do more.

        Heck, hopefully he'll be able to do more, now that the Supreme Court has ruled that the Head of the Executive has the Constitutional Authority within the Executive!to fire whom he pleases, for any reason! We, the American People, have suffered for far too long under an Executive that had only nominal accountability to the People.

  4. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

    So, what about Nationalism isn’t normal or sane? Does your dumb ass not realize it’s generally the default position for most of human history?

    1. epsilon given   1 month ago

      What's worse, the Soviets looked at the Nazis losing WWII and said to themselves "They have done all the evil things we have done, and now the world is going to think we're evil, unless we can find a scapegoat! I know, let's blame everything that the Nazis did on Nationalism and even Capitalism! Then we'll beat anyone who loves their country and wants to be free over the head with the sins of the Nazis, while deflecting from and downplaying own own sins!"

      (Never mind, of course, that Lenin's and Stalin's "International Socialism" was going to be Russian International Socialism! That's ok, because hey, they aren't Nazis, so they aren't dirty Nationalists!)

      1. charliehall   1 month ago

        Communists had been blaming capitalism for the world's ills before Lenin was born. And unfortunately, they did have a point.

        1. epsilon given   1 month ago

          Did they, really? I recall a friend of Karl Marx offered to let Marx see a factory for himself, but Marx refused. He didn't want to spoil his special vision of the future by learning the actual state of affairs.

  5. Scooter   2 months ago

    If by 'recently' you mean 40 years ago, maybe.

    The Donks have been full-retard crazy since at least 2000, likely earlier given their "put on my Presidential Knee Pads" in response to the clear evidence of Clinton's sexual harassment of female staff.

    1. Juliana Frink   2 months ago

      Only 40 years?

      Well, perhaps with respect to full-retard, as you put it. But the pawl was firmly in the ratchet with LBJ and his "Great Society." Never forget his comment on the black vote.

      1. Scooter   2 months ago

        True. At least LBJ, Carter, Mondale etc paid lip service to loving our country.

        This current trend became most visible with the election of Obama and his "Fundamentally Transform" nonsense. Since then, it's just gotten more extreme.

        You saw AOC get the nomination in a deep blue district which started the trend of DSA affiliated candidates gaining power in the DNC.

        1. middlefinger   2 months ago

          According to the utuber street videos, her district is a welfare Dinero Rapido third world shithole full of illegals.

          On side note, Reason brands the utubers who care about their neighborhoods, Nationalist Populists.

          1. charliehall   2 months ago

            Actually it isn't. The western part of AOC's district is one of the wealthiest areas in the US. And it is her base of support.

            1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

              Actually it is, asswipe.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Mondale lost, but here’s a look at the alternate world where he became President.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GADf26GOfTk

        3. charliehall   2 months ago

          Deep blue districts are part of the problem. Republicans create them by packing Democrats into such districts so that they can defeat the sane Democrats. Six normal Democrats lost their districts to Republican gerrymandering just this past May. Louisiana even canceled and election to do that. It used to be only shithole countries where that kind of thing happened.

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            "...so that they can defeat the sane Democrats..."

            Find one, please.

          2. epsilon given   1 month ago

            Some of the deepest blue districts are created where Democrats, and not Republicans, have the power to decide on the districts.

            When was the last time New York even had a Republican House, Assembly, or Governor, let alone all three?

            1. charliehall   1 month ago

              True only in New York City. Usually Democrats want to unpack their districts and pack Republicans.

              "When was the last time New York even had a Republican House, Assembly, or Governor, let alone all three?"

              There is no "House" in New York. The State Assembly was last Republican-controlled after the 1972 election. The State Senate was last controlled by Republicans after the 2016 election. The last Republican Governor was George Pataki, who left office at the end of 2016. Pataki was sane and serious, unlike every Republican who has run for a major office since.

              Now lets talk about Texas.

              1. epsilon given   1 month ago

                I was right about the Assembly, I forgot that the other house was the Senate. I am not sure what the current state of New York politics have been since I left in 2007, but from what I have seen from a national perspective, I find it very hard to believe that any Republicans in New York could have been less sane and serious than any Democrat politician I have seen.

                Sure, you're welcome to talk about Texas now. From what I have been able to see, they are far more sane than New York, in pretty much every way but who the Democrats select for their campaigns. Texans, with the exception of a few districts, are still sane enough to prevent a good portion of those people from getting elected, though.

      2. charliehall   1 month ago

        Yes it was SO horrible that Black people in the South finally were able to vote and LBJ was SO horrible for making that happen.

        1. epsilon given   1 month ago

          Huh? The black people of the South weren't able to vote before LBJ? That doesn't sound right. I'm too tired to look up references and dates, so perhaps you can do that for me.

          But LBJ did convince a generation or two of blacks to vote Democrat, and what do blacks have to show for it? Record black-on-black crime, fatherless homes, periodic hate crime hoaxes, and the absolute worst school districts for teaching kids of all time -- and a determination to keep black kids in those schools, opposing even the hint of school choice.

    2. Rick James   2 months ago

      Not to be "that guy", but to be "that guy" the transformation of the Democratic party started in the 1960s. But like all broad social transformations didn't complete or become so noticeable as it is now until around the 1990s when the Democratic party's 'elitism' had become a majority position which allowed the radical elements to justify themselves. So when you think about it... that puts it on a 20-30 year timeline (late 60s to 90s) which is about right-- a generation.

      the 90s 'pc era' or PC 1.0 as I call it reared its head but retracted slighly after the 90s when, after 'testing the waters' (if you will) and the mainstream reacted somewhat negatively, it gave itself another 20 years (mid 90s to mid 2010s) to make another shot at its own 'great leap forward' and this time it stuck.

      1. middlefinger   2 months ago

        We could go to back to Wilson although FDR deserves an honorable mention for seizing assets and locking Americans in concentration camps.

        “Franklin D. Roosevelt suspended the gold standard in the United States in 1933 as part of his efforts to combat the Great Depression, which included forbidding the hoarding of gold and requiring citizens to turn in their gold coins and certificates.”

      2. Agammamon   2 months ago

        The transformation actually started in the 2000's.

        The pre-1960's D's were open with their racism. They tried to hide it in the 1970's and 1980's but continued to push policies that destroyed minorities (especially blacks) - they just hid it under the guise of 'helping' them. Its the late 1990's when the Marxism started to take hold.

        IMO the end of the Clinton Administration was the change over from just being racists to wanting to destroy the country.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          We never should have ended McCarthyism.

          1. epsilon given   1 month ago

            As a thought exercise, imagine treating McCarthy the way we did if he credibly claimed there were Nazis in the government?

            We call his efforts to find Communists a "witch hunt" as if he was trying to root out something that didn't exist, except in the imaginations of the accusers and the so-called inquisitioners -- when in reality, Communists did exist, they were trying to weasel their way into Hollywood, and education, and government, and they are at best just as evil as Nazis ever were.

        2. charliehall   2 months ago

          "The pre-1960's D's were open with their racism. "

          By the 1970s they had almost all become Republicans. They were welcomed with open arms by Nixon in his "Southern Strategy".

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            According to Google:

            "Richard Nixon played a significant role in the desegregation of Southern schools, particularly after the Supreme Court's 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared segregated schools unconstitutional. His administration aimed to enforce this ruling while managing the transition through cooperation and local leadership, resulting in a dramatic decrease in all-black schools in the South from 68% in 1968 to just 8% by 1974."

            Nixon, for all his faults, had a pretty sound record on race, going back to his days as a student at Whittier College. Trouble is he lacked the courage of his convictions. During the 1960 race, MLK was picked up by police in Georgia and there were fears that they'd shoot him and dump him in a ditch. Coretta was beside herself, but Nixon, who was on friendly terms with the King family, was afraid that a re-assuring phone call would make him look bad in the eyes of white voters. Kennedy, no friend to black Americans made the call and picked up the positive press coverage.

            1. charliehall   1 month ago

              Nixon had worked with Senate Republican leader William Knowland and Attorney General Herbert Brownell to get the 1957 Civil Rights Bill passed. But they could not convince the Republican reactionaries, mostly from the midwest, to vote to end the southern filibuster. Exactly one southern Democrat supported the bill -- Ralph Yarborough of Texas. Knowland was VERY conservative and would play a major role in developing the career of Ronald Reagan (who at that time was still a Democrat). The bill was gutted but a shell passed.

          2. DesigNate   2 months ago

            Imagine thinking this is what happened.

          3. epsilon given   1 month ago

            Oh, not this canard again! I checked the Electoral College when Nixon allegedly deployed the "Southern Strategy", and the one or two States that he won in the South, he won because Democrats split their vote with an outright Segregationist. What's worse, that outright Segregationist won in several Southern States, giving him Electoral College votes/.

            For all this "the Parties switched sides" it's pretty amazing how few politicians from either side switched in that era, and how the "Party of Small Government" became the "Party of Small Government, but with Racism" while the "Party of We Control All and Have to Distance Ourselves from Hitler and Mussolini Because they Lost the Last War and We Saw All the Evil they Committed But Nonetheless Still Support Lenin and Stalin Because Their Evils Aren't Well Known and Besides True Communism Has Never Been Tried But We're the Ones Who Will Finally Get it Right" became "That Same Party, but Without the Racism, Wink Wink!".

            1. charliehall   1 month ago

              Republicans were never the party of small government. They were founded to be the party of corporate welfare in 1854.

              1. epsilon given   1 month ago

                Even so, they have always been better at it than Democrats ever were -- indeed, the "small government" types were always more at home in the Republican Party than in the Democrat one.

      3. charliehall   1 month ago

        " the transformation of the Democratic party started in the 1960s."

        True, it expelled its racists. So PC to say that Black people should not have inferior schools and be prevented from voting. Republicans had had a better civil rights record since 1936, but Richard Nixon, who wasn't racist and had had a strong civil rights record as Vice President, decided to go for Party rather than Principle.

  6. DRM   2 months ago

    Actually, no, Platner only suspended his campaign. He still hasn't filed the paperwork to actually drop out. Unless and until he does that, he's still, by law, going to be on the November ballot as the Democrat.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      It ends on Monday. Need time to shuffle funds around.

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      Assuming rules will be followed/upheld.

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      I wonder what the DNC had to give him to agree to go away.

    4. DRM   2 months ago

      Okay, now he's gone and withdrawn.

  7. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >Democrats passed over the opportunity to be the sane party in favor of bad people and worse ideas

    Yeah. We told you this back in 2007. But you had to keep 'reluctantly, but strategically' your vote.

  8. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >"There was a time, not long ago, when Democrats could have branded their organization as the sane party. With Republicans moving in a sharply nationalist/populist direction that looked more over time like a cult of personality for Donald J. Trump, there was an opening for the donkey party to offer refuge to normies. All Democrats had to do was hold the ground against crazy.

    So multi-culti no borders ruled by the UN and WEF globalism is the same option?

    But that is exactly what Platner is offering.

    1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      How long ago does he think that "not long ago" actually is? The Clinton administration would be the last sane one with Gore's candidacy being the end of that era and the start of the full embrace of watermelon politics and it's offshoots.

      The problem for Toosilly and the rest of the open borders crowd is the embrace of nationalism and populism is what is attracting normies given the absolutely bananas alternative in the mainstream Dem. We don't want to be Haiti North or live through the disastrous policies of South America or the middle East or Africa.

      1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

        I would also put Al Gore as the red line where the Ds let the mask slip on their socialist agenda. Clinton still had to pretend to hate the Soviets.

        1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

          Clinton could have been a true believer commie but he was pragmatic in his actual policy positions and craved the popularity it brought regardless of his personal desires (see his attempt to nationalize healthcare and his retreat from that).

  9. middlefinger   2 months ago

    “There was a time, not long ago, when Democrats could have branded their organization as the sane party.”

    😂 LOL

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      "not long ago" needs a definition. And a 20 page explainer for me to even entertain that as a rational argument.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Keep in mind this is being written by an open borders globalist idiot like JD, who works for an open borders leftist publication managed by an even bigger malignant idiot (KMW).

      Fire KMW, hire Stossel as interim editor in chief, and have him clean house. restructuring Reason into a libertarian publication.

      1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

        C'mon, you still wouldn't like it. A properly "Libertarian" Reason (which it currently is despite your objections) will necessarily continue to criticize Trump/Republicans on the regular, just as the current "Hardcore Flaming Lefty" Reason (you imagine) does today.

        Why would you want a Libertarian perspective when you're clearly deep in the pants with Republicans?

        1. ungulant   2 months ago

          Oh my god. You actually get it!

          Reason articles always have like 100 partisan hack loyalist commenters for every 1 actual Libertarian. It's wild.

        2. epsilon given   1 month ago

          There are plenty of Republicans -- even Republicans who support President Trump -- who are willing to criticize President Trump and the Republicans on the regular, and will even read the hate-mail that comes their way complaining about said complaints.

          I like a Libertarian perspective, but when a perspective readily glosses over or even endorses policies of Democrats they ought to be opposing, I cannot take that perspective to be "Libertarian" in any way.

          At this point, my primary reason for visiting Reason is to see how Reason gets trashed for their predictable takes on how Democrats can do no evil, and Republicans can do no good.

          1. RJ Mathews   1 month ago

            Why would Libertarians automatically oppose policies of the Democrat party? That doesn’t make any sense. Libertarianism exists outside of the political parties and, in its pure form, is unconcerned with partisanship

            1. epsilon given   1 month ago

              They wouldn't automatically oppose policies of the Democrat Party, but they would oppose most of the policies of the Democrat Party on merit alone. "Reason" consistently took the side of Obama and Hillary even back when Obama gave us that evil anti-libertarian abomination of Obama "Care", aka the "Affordabe" "Care" Act.

              How in the world is this consistent with libertarianism?

  10. mtrueman   2 months ago

    "But that is exactly what Platner is offering."

    He's offering youth. He's decades younger than Feinstein, Pelosi, Schumer, Trump, McConnell etc. His rival in the Maine Democrat primary was 77.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      He's offering youth inexperience and bad ideas.

      1. Scooter   2 months ago

        History shows that Europe's experiment with Socialism did not work out too well.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Or trannys, or mass immigration from Islamist countries, or their defense posture………..

        2. charliehall   1 month ago

          The only western European country to go full on socialist was the UK. It went almost three decades without a recession. Please cite any example of a capitalist country that managed that.

      2. mtrueman   2 months ago

        "He's offering youth inexperience and bad ideas."

        Maine voters decided that putting America first was a positive. Had they wanted an Israel firster, they would have chosen someone else.

        1. Scooter   2 months ago

          "TEH JOOOOOOOS!"

          LMAO

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            Not all Israel firsters are Jooooooos. Look at Trump or Biden or Platner's opponent in the primary. None of them are Jooooos.

            1. Scooter   2 months ago

              Stormfront called, you need to show up at the next meeting.

              1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                He's HOST! JFucked, nardzs are attedees.

              2. mtrueman   2 months ago

                "Stormfront called,"

                You're getting instructions from Stormfront now? You'll never make it as an Israel firster at this rate.

                1. epsilon given   1 month ago

                  I'm pretty sure they got the wrong number; they probably transposed a couple of digits while trying to call you.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          You mean Maine DEMOCRAT voters, you Jew hating, communist cunt.

        3. epsilon given   1 month ago

          You can be America First without having, you know, an actual Nazi tattoo or a proclivity to abusing women.

          But Democrats these days think you have to have both (and then some!) to be "America First", which tells us what Democrats think of the average American.

          Oh, and you strike me as the type who would suggest Platner couldn't be a Nazi, because he hates Jews!

        4. charliehall   1 month ago

          Yup. There were a lot of America First Democrats in 1940. FDR had to replace some of his own cabinet because of that. America First was pro Nazi then, pro Nazi now.

          1. epsilon given   1 month ago

            Most of the "Pro Nazi" types I see are either Democrats, or "Republicans" trying to sabotage Republicans and eventually giving up and going back to being Democrats. And as such they are hardly "America First".

    2. Rick James   2 months ago

      You know who else offers "youth"?

      1. middlefinger   2 months ago

        Greta Thunberg?

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          The left would get a lot more traction with their youth activists if they made they got poster girls that look like Sydney Sweeney instead pf Fat Greta.

      2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        Epstein?

    3. creech   2 months ago

      "He's offering youth. "
      Bingo. The average Maine Dem primary voter probably had little to no knowledge of Platner's unsavory ideas or character. The media does not do its job reporting on or digging into such things. In many ways, the "smoke filled room" where the bosses (financial or ideological) get together to decide who runs and gets their backing, still exists. [Applies to both parties.]

      1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 months ago

        "In many ways, the "smoke filled room" where the bosses (financial or ideological) get together to decide who runs and gets their backing, still exists."

        The media provides the smoke for the Ds and DSA.

      2. mtrueman   2 months ago

        " The media does not do its job reporting on or digging into such things. "

        You've got to be kidding. Reason has run nothing but negative stories on Platner for months now. Today's story is a good indication of the tone of the coverage. Platner has a tattoo. We learned that months ago, and still the fact needs to be endlessly rehashed. Today's story is yet more rehashing. The establishment figures of both parties and the media have also been universally negative. You shouldn't be surprised at this. Platner is solidly opposed to Israeli genocide in Gaza. That accounts for the establishment hand wringing over his popularity and the reason why he must be stopped. The rest is opera.

        A court found Trump liable for sexually abusing a woman, fining him millions of dollars. Far worse than anything Platner has undergone. Yet a wealthy donor gave $100 million to Trump for his campaign. Because it was clear that he was in favor of the genocide and it was understood that once in office he was willing to do the bidding of Netanyahu. The sex scandals and history as a frequent flyer on the Lolita Express could be conveniently ignored. Israel first is the ticket.

        1. Scooter   2 months ago

          LMAO.

          There is no genocide in Gaza, unless you redefine the word to mean nothing.

          The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is not a history book.

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            "There is no genocide in Gaza"

            Exactly. If only Platner had said that, he'd still be the candidate.

            1. Scooter   2 months ago

              LMAO.

              He's still got the Nazi tattoo, fake biography and predatory actions.

              And, there's still no genocide in Gaza.

              1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                "And, there's still no genocide in Gaza."

                Exactly. If only he'd said that, he'd still be the candidate.

                1. Scooter   2 months ago

                  Repeating a lie doesn't make it any less of a lie.

                  1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                    Exactly. If only...

                    1. Scooter   2 months ago

                      You're still lying

            2. epsilon given   1 month ago

              Heh, it's clear now that the only reason Platner is out of the race is because his polls weren't all that hot, the Democrat Leadership got scared, so they finally pulled out their Blackmail file and said "It's time to call Politico and/or Axios!"

              If Platner was still in the lead, he could eat babies on live TV and they'd support him -- heck, they'd supply the babies and stream it if it meant higher poll numbers!

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          You’re really upset that your soulmate is being pushed out, aren’t you?

        3. creech   2 months ago

          Mtrueman, I guess I stand corrected. Platner won the primary on June 6th, apparently after all (or most of) the info about his envious ideology and dirtbag persona came out. So I guess the average Democrats who voted for him were not, as I indicated, in the dark, but rather fully and eagerly aware of what they were getting.

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            "So I guess the average Democrats who voted for him were not, as I indicated, in the dark, but rather fully and eagerly aware of what they were getting."

            You're assuming 1) the negative media reports are true, 2) the Maine voters were aware of the reports, and 3) they believed the reports to be true and of consequence.

            One thing you should be aware of is American's low regard for the press and the establishment pundits. Even less trustworthy than politicians. You apparently take them at their word and are ready to believe what they report on Platner, a candidate opposed to the Establishment. I think it might be a mistake to assume that the Maine voters place as much trust and faith in the Establishment press as you do. You're ready to believe, as Reason repeatedly tells you that Platner, and by extension, Maine voters, hate Jews. I think that's a mistake. I doubt Maine voters care all that much about Israel, or any other small country in Asia, and are more concerned with local issues.

            1. epsilon given   1 month ago

              One of the reasons the media is so distrusted right now is because they deliberately provide cover for Democrats. This is why everyone paying attention to Republican-ish sources knew about Platner's skeletons -- and everyone would have known about them had the media played it straight.

              Platner isn't opposed to the Establishment, he's the reinforcement of the Establishment that President Trump is trying to destroy.

              Platner deserves to go down in flames, as does his Party who tried to prop him up and his Propagandists who did everything in their power to make sure Platner could win this seat -- and who pulled the rug out from under him when they found they didn't have enough power to stop Platner from being exposed as the rotten Communist Democrat Nazi Rapist Scum that he is.

        4. DesigNate   2 months ago

          The NYT et al have been lamenting their not warning voters for a week now.

          You are a fucking clown.

      3. ungulant   2 months ago

        Every press website has had like dozens of articles about Platner.

    4. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      ""He's offering youth.""

      I guess when you look past the scandals, that's what's left.

      1. mtrueman   2 months ago

        "I guess when you look past the scandals,"

        The scandals matter to the pundits, talking heads, and establishment figures. That's what's driving this decision to drop out. The Maine voters were impressed by his youth, dynamism and commitment to their interests.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          He’s a Nazi, communist, pervert, violent rapist, drunk, loser ragbag. So basically your ideal candidate. Sarc too. I hear he’s inconsolable.

    5. charliehall   2 months ago

      Trump is 80.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Charliehall is 20, going on the 6th grade.

  11. Rick James   2 months ago

    Progressive Democrats Embrace Platner's Bad Ideas, Minus Felony Allegations

    Tuccille, you've got a couple of fellow writers that are "of two minds" on that.

  12. MWAocdoc   2 months ago

    As usual, my question is: when did he force his way into her home and rape her? Did she file a report with the police at the time? Or - also as usual - did she fail to report the attack at the time and only bring it up at the "me too" moment timed to derail his candidacy?

    1. Rick James   2 months ago

      I think the answer to everything past the 'as usual' is "yes". She supports his ideas, just not him as a person. She's probably like the Anita Hill of Maine politics.

    2. mtrueman   2 months ago

      What I heard was that Platner apparently visited her after she sent a message saying she 'needed her glutes massaged.' After the alleged rape, she invited him to spend the night, and there is no record of her reporting the incident to the police or her friends, family etc.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Nope. Thats all bullshit. You heard wrong, which is unsurprising.

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Had the democrats not pulled all their bullshit with Trump, Kavanaugh, etc.. I might have some sympathy over unproven accusations. But they did all of that, so I’m just fine with all of this causing them to tear each other apart,

      The democrat party should burn.

      1. epsilon given   1 month ago

        What's worse, the allegations coming out against Platner are far more credible than the ones against Trump or Kavanaugh, etc.

        It's odd how it's "Trust all women!" until it's a woman (or several, as in the case of Platner) allegating against a Democrat.

  13. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

    In a political time when we just had a senile open borders president with a DEI retard VP, a bald tranny with a goatee in a dress as an appointed official, a fat frumpy non passing man tranny in DHS, open and out marxist calling to seize private property or calling it white supremacy, in a party full of sex pests...

    Platner is completely predictable, not a one off. He's standard stock for modern democrats

    1. mtrueman   2 months ago

      " He's standard stock for modern democrats"

      That's why the establishment is so frightened of him. They haven't found a way to manipulate or corrupt him, as they have with Trump or Biden. So a ginned up sex scandal is the best way to deal with him.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        I’m bookmarking this..

      2. mtrueman   2 months ago

        Trump and Biden were both accused of rape. And more credibly than the accusations against Platner. They never had to withdraw from any race. On the contrary, billionaires and corporate America showered their campaigns with hundreds of millions of $.

        1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

          "Trump and Biden were both accused of rape. And more credibly than the accusations against Platner."

          From what ive seen, she told him not to come over, and that she wasnt interested, and he did anyways, and let himself in, this much is at least documented via texts.

          From her story, she says she tried to reject him and he pushed forward. And he fucked her while black out drunk while she didnt do anything to anger him.

          Why dont we contrast this with Kavanaugh? He apparently after a beer or 2, maybe, tackle kissed a girl, and then nothing happened. And we had a fucking national referendum on him for that.

          Sorry, but rules for me, rules for thee.

          Platner is substantially more guilty than Trump or Biden. You cant even compare the accounts with a straight face, if you are being honest.

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            "From what ive seen"

            You're relying on reports from the corporate media. Not a good move. Other media report he responded to a text saying she 'needed her glutes massaging.' ie sex. After the alleged rape, she invited him to spend the night together in bed, and after never reported the incident to the police. And unlike similar cases (Ford/Kavanagh) the woman in the Platner affair never confided with her friends after the incident.

            "Platner is substantially more guilty than Trump or Biden. "

            How so? Platner never went to court. Was never charged. Trump was, went to court and was found liable.The case against Biden is far more credible than the accusation against Platner.

            "if you are being honest"

            Honestly, I confess I don't know what happened on the night in question. But I have my suspicions about an Establishment campaign to remove Platner which you don't share and are willing to follow the corporate media take down.

            1. Mike Parsons   2 months ago

              "But I have my suspicions about an Establishment campaign to remove Platner which you don't share "

              I had like 5 posts the morning after saying exactly this. Very possible.

              A guy with a history of serious alcohol abuse and blacking out, went over after being told no, and something happened. A guy who is a weirdo sex pest.

              I could absolutely see this being another Blasey Ford. But also, it would track with his behavior to a T. He's an alcoholic weirdo that's into gross sex and blacks out all the time. I wouldn't be surprised if there were 10 more of these stories

              1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                "He's an alcoholic weirdo that's into gross sex and blacks out all the time. I wouldn't be surprised if there were 10 more of these stories"

                And nobody gives a shit. Look at the velvet glove treatment Biden and Trump received despite more credible accusations of rape and sexual abuse. You're missing the point. Platner is a Left Wing Populist who is critical of the Israeli genocide in Gaza, and wants to put the interests of voters of Maine first and foremost. That's more than enough to make him a threat to the Establishment that needs to be eliminated.

                1. Scooter   2 months ago

                  Liar.

                  LMAO

                  1. mtrueman   1 month ago

                    Scooter, I'm flattered by your attention. If you have anything of substance to contribute, please share.

          2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            "...if you are being honest..."

            Remember:

            mtrueman|8.30.17 @ 1:42PM|#
            "Spouting nonsense is an end in itself."

            Don't ever confuse a trueman post with anything close to honesty. The asswipe has no concept of the word.

      3. epsilon given   1 month ago

        Corrupt him? What's left to corrupt? At this point, the only question is "How the heck can Platner be redeemed, and find forgiveness for his sins?"

        I'm reminded of the statement that you cannot bribe a British journalist -- but, having seen what a British journalist would do unbribed, when would you even have an occasion to bribe him?

  14. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

    “Democrats passed over the opportunity to be the sane party in favor of bad people and worse ideas.”

    Hey JD, look in a fucking mirror.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      That's a steaming pile of TDS-addled lying shit looking back at him.

  15. Brett Bellmore   1 month ago

    It's the universities, really.

    They were mildly left-wing 30 years ago, but the left did have a bit of a statistical edge. Then the Republicans shocked everybody by winning control of Congress in the '94 election. That's what set everything off.

    Left-wing academics went from viewing their conservative colleagues as harmless eccentrics to being dangerous, because their ideas might actually get implemented. And adopted a policy of simply not hiring anybody who they so much as suspected of being conservative. And they had the numerical advantage to pull it off.

    The result was a purge by attrition, and at this point most of the universities are essentially devoid of anybody on the right, outside of a few old guys approaching retirement.

    In fact, it's worse than that, because they just kept purging everybody to the right, even after actual conservatives were gone, and the ideological center of most university faculties is now somewhere between Lenin and Stalin.

    And this is where the Democratic party is getting its activists.

    So the Democratic party is turning into a Communist party, in all but name, and there's probably no going back. A return to sanity isn't even an option at this point.

  16. RJ Mathews   1 month ago

    The Democrat Party never “eagerly embraced” Platner. They ignored him until he won the primary then begrudgingly got on board.

    1. charliehall   1 month ago

      The Democrat Party didn't embrace Platner because there is no party by that name in the US.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Brendan Carr's Vendetta Against ABC Conflates the 'Public Interest' With Trump's Personal Grievances

Jacob Sullum | 8.26.2026 12:01 AM

How Much Will Andy Burnham's 'No. 10 North' Cost British Taxpayers?

Reem Ibrahim | 8.25.2026 4:56 PM

California Bill Would Cap Rents During U.S.-Involved War

Christian Britschgi | 8.25.2026 3:45 PM

The Freedom 250 IndyCar Race Only Looked Like MAGA Propaganda if You Already Hate Trump

Jason Russell | 8.25.2026 12:00 PM

J.D. Vance's Interest in Huey Long Should Be a Red Flag for Conservatives

Eric Boehm | 8.25.2026 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason