Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

ICE

ICE Largely Abandons Plan To Turn Warehouses Into Migrant Detention Facilities

The Department of Homeland Security plans to sell or offload seven warehouses it originally purchased to house migrants.

Joe Lancaster | 6.19.2026 12:31 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and a warehouse purchased for use by Immigration and Customs Enforcement | roxburynj/DHS/Aaron Schwartz - Pool via CNP/SIPA/Newscom
(roxburynj/DHS/Aaron Schwartz - Pool via CNP/SIPA/Newscom)

As part of President Donald Trump's plan to deport every single undocumented immigrant—and perhaps tens of millions of citizens and legal residents—the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) planned to spend billions of dollars buying up industrial warehouses across the country.

The stated purpose was to convert them into detention centers to house migrants targeted for deportation, with the ultimate goal of expanding total detention capacity to 100,000.

Reportedly, and in a welcome development, the DHS is largely scrapping the plan, and most of the warehouses it has already purchased will be sold or used for another purpose.

"In a major turnabout, [ICE] is planning to offload seven warehouses purchased for more than $700 million by either giving them to other federal agencies or selling them outright," Hamed Aleaziz reported this week at The New York Times. In particular, that includes two in Georgia, two in Pennsylvania, and one each in Michigan, New Jersey, and Utah.

The shift seems to have been in the works for a while. "DHS and ICE officials have identified several of the eleven previously purchased warehouses, some of which were expected to be repurposed to hold as many as 8,000 immigrants, for potential sale," Julia Ainsley and Laura Strickler reported last month for NBC News.

The warehouse plan seems to have been a vestige of former DHS Secretary Kristi Noem's tenure: Aleaziz called it a "signature initiative" of Noem's, while her successor, Markwayne Mullin, "privately expressed skepticism about the plan [and] has said publicly that he wants the agency to be quieter about how it carries out immigration enforcement."

"These heinous criminals, once arrested, should be removed at lightning speed, not housed on American soil at the taxpayer's expense," Mullin told the Times in a statement. "D.H.S. is moving swiftly to utilize EXISTING detention space with our state and county partners."

The plan is apparently not completely dead: Aleaziz notes that ICE "appears to still be moving forward with four of the warehouses purchased for detention purposes"—two in Texas, and one each in Arizona and Maryland—and "also plans to buy immigrant detention facilities from private prison companies that it already contracts with."

That's too bad. The warehouse gambit was wasteful, inhumane, and short-sighted, and ending it would be a net positive.

When Trump fired Noem in March, her profligate spending was reportedly a factor, and the warehouses were part of it. As NBC News noted last month, "The DHS inspector general is examining ICE's purchases of warehouses around the country as part of an audit examining whether DHS met the need for new detention space in a 'cost-effective manner.'"

The warehouses were a boondoggle from the start. Each was expected to cost hundreds of millions of dollars to purchase and retrofit, not to mention operation costs.

The government also significantly overpaid: According to Project Salt Box, a Substack that tracks government procurement and infrastructure spending, ICE has so far spent $1.07 billion for the 11 facilities—134 percent above their total estimated market value.

That will now affect how much money can be recouped. "The markups that the government paid in rushing to buy the warehouses set the floor for any loss, and a private buyer has little reason to pay what the government did for warehouses that had sat empty for years before ICE acquired them," wrote Michael Wriston of Project Salt Box.

That rush was also apparent when the government was called to explain how massive detention facilities—that in some cases would hold 8,500 people or more, plus an entire staff—could be built in rural or suburban areas without straining local resources.

As Reason reported earlier this year, many in targeted areas—even Trump-friendly towns and states—opposed the plan. Officials in small towns warned that their infrastructure was already at or near capacity and could not support such a sudden, large increase in the local population.

The government's explanations were often unsatisfying, and in many cases, officials simply abandoned plans in the face of opposition from both citizens and elected officials. (Project Salt Box notes that in addition to the 11 facilities purchased, the government also canceled sales of 13 sites.)

Social Circle, Georgia, is one of the towns where the government bought a warehouse that it now plans to offload.

"I'm glad that DHS has concluded that Social Circle is not the right place for this type of facility," city manager Eric Taylor tells Reason. "That is what we have been trying to say from the beginning. If they had bothered to speak to us before purchasing the building, maybe they would have realized that the $129 million they spent could have been put to better use elsewhere. We look forward to seeing what the ultimate fate of the property is. If it is retained for government use, hopefully they reach out to us to discuss plans from the very beginning."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bibi Tearing Up the Deal

Joe Lancaster is an assistant editor at Reason.

ICEImmigrationMigrantsFederal governmentDHSGovernment SpendingDepartment of Homeland SecurityFederal PrisonsTrump AdministrationPolitics
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (15)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 hours ago

    So?

    (First, but not Fist)

    Log in to Reply
    1. mad.casual   2 hours ago

      1.6M fewer illegal immigrants showed up this year, so ICE is repurposing or selling off the warehouses they expected to house them. New guy is more in favor of shipping Maryland Dad to El Salvador more expediently and quietly.

      Reason is, retardedly, trying to floss the pieces of a victory from between the teeth of the jaws of defeat on one of the key issues that has run their party and their political ideology into a crater.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 hours ago

        Wait, "free shit at taxpayer expense for every self-declared refugee" is not libertarian?

        Interesting.

        Log in to Reply
  2. damikesc   2 hours ago

    I'm more agreed with summary executions of all illegals.

    Log in to Reply
    1. Vernon Depner   20 minutes ago

      At least, for illegal border crossers who are repeat offenders.

      Log in to Reply
  3. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 hours ago

    or used for another purpose.

    Trump grocery stories. People are saying they're 100x better then that socialist's from NYC stories.

    Log in to Reply
    1. damikesc   2 hours ago

      Using libertarian theory, why should I --- a thankful non-New Yorker --- give two shits about what Mamdani does? I would not care if he decided to liquidate the entire population of the state. It's not MY problem, right?

      Log in to Reply
    2. Social Justice is neither   1 hour ago

      If you're going to make shit up at least do it right.

      A modest proposal for the Trump Admin: Soylent Green processing facilities using only the best ingredients sourced from the world over.

      Log in to Reply
  4. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 hours ago

    "Trump's plan to deport every single undocumented immigrant—and perhaps tens of millions of citizens and legal residents—"

    The double em-dash. Proof that Joe Lancaster is just a fucking hack using AI trained on Marxist, TDS-fueled ravings.

    Find us one legal resident that has been deported, you useless cunt. Just one.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Chuck P. (Now with less Sarc more snark)   2 hours ago
    Log in to Reply
  6. DesigNate   1 hour ago

    What citizen has been deported?

    Log in to Reply
    1. Vernon Depner   7 minutes ago

      I could suggest a few.

      Log in to Reply
  7. Vernon Depner   17 minutes ago

    Officials in small towns warned that their infrastructure...could not support such a sudden, large increase in the local population.

    They didn't care about that when they dumped 20,000 Haitians on Springfield, Ohio.

    Log in to Reply
  8. Vernon Depner   13 minutes ago

    If deportations could be expedited, we would need fewer kennels to hold the invaders in. People who work to impede deportations are making prolonged detention more likely. Kind of like the people whose opposition to quick and humane methods of execution leads to more botched executions and longer stays on death row.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Vernon Depner   8 minutes ago

    Please quote from where President Trump said he wanted to deport tens of millions of citizens.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Supreme Court Decision Restricting Appeal Waivers Underlines the Injustice of Coercive Plea Bargaining

Jacob Sullum | 6.19.2026 2:45 PM

ICE Largely Abandons Plan To Turn Warehouses Into Migrant Detention Facilities

Joe Lancaster | 6.19.2026 12:31 PM

Bibi Tearing Up the Deal

Liz Wolfe | 6.19.2026 9:30 AM

Celebrating American Freedom Means Celebrating Juneteenth

Joe Lancaster | 6.19.2026 8:15 AM

Did California's Gubernatorial Race Reveal the Limits of 'Abundance' Politics on the Left?

Steven Greenhut | 6.19.2026 7:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks