Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Iran

Trump and Bibi Are Fighting

Plus: L.A. mayoral race updates, stabbing at Penn, Jon Ossoff thirst, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 6.8.2026 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
President Donald Trump speaks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the Red Room of the White House, Monday, September 29, 2025. | Daniel Torok/White House/Newscom
(Daniel Torok/White House/Newscom)

Israel and Iran exchange first strikes since April: For the last two months, the ceasefire between Israel and Iran had mostly held. Until this weekend, when it quickly unraveled. Now Iran is indicating its military campaign is over for now and that it's ready to deescalate once again. (Who knows how true that is, of course.)

"Iran fired waves of ballistic missiles at Israel on Sunday night in retaliation for an Israeli strike near the Lebanese capital, Beirut, against its ally Hezbollah," reports The New York Times. "The Israeli military said on Monday morning that it had launched two waves of airstrikes across Iran, including against the country's largest petrochemical complex, prompting further Iranian missile attacks on central Israel."

The fact that Iran started striking Israel because of Israel's actions against Hezbollah—the terrorist group that has been firing on Israel from southern Lebanon since October 2023, in what has been termed the "Gaza Support War"—is of great significance; it shows a shift in how Iran is thinking about defense of its allies

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"This is the first time in decades that a regional power has the means, capacity, and willingness to put hard power against Israeli military maneuvers or aggression against a third party," writes Iran scholar Trita Parsi on his Substack. The full post characterizes Israel's actions as involving "genocide," a characterization with which I disagree, for reasons David Bernstein outlines here. But Parsi's evaluation of the changing stakes is correct: Iran's newfound willingness to strike Israel due to Israel's strikes on Hezbollah signals that U.S. support of Israel may become costlier. It makes sense that President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been exchanging tense words (and that Trump has been urging Bibi to hold off on attacking Iran, allowing a little more time for diplomacy).

The magnitude of what just happened may take some time to sink in.

This is the first time Iran has struck Israel after Israel struck another country's territory (that is, not Iran).

This means that the battle lines have been moved.

Iran's deterrence had already been restored… pic.twitter.com/KHpNjBTh97

— Trita Parsi (@tparsi) June 7, 2026

If Israel strikes southern Lebanon again, the Iranian military warned, "much harsher and more crushing actions than before will be on the way." (But does this means it's open season for Hezbollah, and they can just strike Israel with no consequences?) Tehran also said "it will target all oil and gas facilities linked to Israel, the US and their allies in the region if attacks on its own energy infrastructure continue" per Bloomberg and Fars, the Persian news service.

Where are the votes? Why exactly is it taking so damn long to count the votes in L.A.'s mayoral primary?

No winner has been determined yet, but Spencer Pratt—who had previously been in second place, behind incumbent mayor Karen Bass—is now trailing behind in third, after this most recent vote dump. Being third place behind Nithya Raman would mean Pratt does not advance to the primary, which would mean voters get the choice between basically two flavors of the same.

Me trying to figure out how votes get counted in LA pic.twitter.com/cXsbXNsY5C

— Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) June 7, 2026

The Associated Press notes that only 80 percent of votes have been counted, so we don't really know the full outcome yet. And The New York Times reports that "late returns have trended heavily in favor of the liberals who make up an overwhelming majority of the city's electorate." Plenty of people on the right have implied or outright alleged that that reflects election integrity problems:

Spencer Pratt was doing this well because he was calling out a crooked and flawed system. If this is how they think they're going to stop him, buckle up. They're going to unleash something much bigger.

— Bethany S. Mandel (@bethanyshondark) June 7, 2026

No credible evidence of that has emerged. If that changes, I'll note it.

Even though he's a reality TV star with no governing experience, I can imagine Pratt being a breath of fresh air. "When it's other people's money for other people's stuff, neither cost nor quality matters," he said in a campaign ad, succinctly summarizing the problem with L.A.'s governance. (Also kind of a Milton Friedman point, but if any politician wants to coopt it, I'll take it.) It's kind of beautiful how much sheer rage he feels for the governing overlords whom he holds responsible for his home burning in the Palisades fire. It would be disappointing if Pratt didn't get to advance, mostly because Raman doesn't seem to present much opportunity for contrast from Bass.


Scenes from New York: Six people were injured in a stabbing at Penn Station last night. "He was just screaming, waving his head around," one witness told CBS of the suspect. "I've seen him once, but I didn't think he was capable of doing anything." CNN described him as possibly "unhoused." (Their euphemism, not mine.)

It's almost like letting crazy people take up semi-permanent residence in the subway tunnels does both them and others a disservice.


QUICK HITS

  • "For decades, oil traders, executives and analysts warned that closing the Strait of Hormuz would be a global economic catastrophe," reports Bloomberg. "It's now been more than three months since the waterway was effectively blocked, creating the worst supply shock in modern history. But a slew of workarounds is keeping crude oil below $100 a barrel, defying many of the industry's grimmest forecasts for prices as high as $200. A combination of record US exports, a sharp and unexpected slowdown in Chinese demand and a steady trickle of crude still finding its way through the strait has helped absorb much of the shock from the loss of more than 10 million barrels a day of Middle Eastern supply."
  • "Local police received a call on May 27 claiming to have heard gunshots at Justice [Amy Coney] Barrett's residence," notes the editorial board of The Wall Street Journal. "The call was a fake emergency meant to send police to swarm the home of the Justice and her family…the latest in a pattern of harassment of Justices' families aimed at intimidation or worse."
  • Michelle Goldberg on "Why Everyone Wants Jon Ossoff to Run for President." (Is this really what "everyone" wants? News to me.)
  • Whole Foods comes to Bushwick, Brooklyn…and people flip out:

one good question to ask when people say stuff like this is: in what specific way are the ~45% of bushwick residents who make below $80k harmed by the presence of a whole foods? https://t.co/qu5boWIEv9

— just matt (@questionableway) June 7, 2026

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The 'Living Wage' Attack on Jobs and Prosperity

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

IranIsraelMiddle EastMilitaryWarTrump AdministrationLos AngelesPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (43)

Latest

Trump and Bibi Are Fighting

Liz Wolfe | 6.8.2026 9:30 AM

The 'Living Wage' Attack on Jobs and Prosperity

J.D. Tuccille | 6.8.2026 7:00 AM

Neil Gorsuch on the Declaration of Independence, Originalism, and Separation of Powers

Nick Gillespie | From the July 2026 issue

Brickbat: Regulated Reliability

Charles Oliver | 6.8.2026 4:00 AM

Is Japan a Libertarian Paradise? Not Quite. 

Lloyd Botway | 6.7.2026 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks