Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Politics

The Draft Is Unpopular. Registration Becomes Automatic in December Anyway.

The federal government will now dig through databases to register 18-year-olds for conscription.

J.D. Tuccille | 6.3.2026 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Soldiers | Maurice Gaddy/ZUMA Press/Newscom
(Maurice Gaddy/ZUMA Press/Newscom)

Americans aren't interested in reinstating a military draft, but that's not stopping the government from "streamlining" Selective Service registration—for young men's own good, we're told. That's right, the government is automating draft registration, using the excuse that it's saving registrants from the legal peril inherent in choosing to not register. The real reason, of course, is that fewer men were voluntarily registering, and the government wants to gloss over that mass rejection by potential draftees.

Automated Registration for Your Own Good?

One component of the fiscal year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) "modernizes Selective Service through automatic registration," boasted Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D–Pa.), who helped push the change. "This update will save taxpayer dollars and reverse falling registration rates by ensuring the Selective Service automatically registers young men, so that none inadvertently face the serious penalties of failing to register."

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The Selective Service System (SSS) has now formally proposed a rule to implement automatic registration.

How many men "inadvertently" face legal peril is an open question. There may well be some young men thankful that they're being spared the challenging task of deciding whether to fill their names in on a form. But they're probably offset by the many people who prefer to make their own choices. Admittedly, the potential penalties for not registering are stiff.

"Failure to register with Selective Service is a violation of the Military Selective Service Act," according to the Selective Service System. "Conviction for such a violation may result in imprisonment for up to five years and/or a fine of not more than $250,000." Additionally, "once you turn 26, it's too late to register. Even though you may not be prosecuted, you may be denied student financial assistance, federal job training, and most federal employment at the discretion of the entity providing the benefit or service."

Years of Declining Draft Registration Compliance

Despite the penalties, more young men have been risking running afoul of the law in recent years.

"SSS is experiencing a significant decline in registrations by 18-year-old men," according to Selective Service documents acquired through a Freedom of Information Act request by peace activist Edward Hasbrouck. "In 2020, the registration rate for 18-year-old men nationwide was 61.8%, today it is just 39.9%." 

Declining registration by young men reaching the age of majority eroded the total pool of men available for conscription in the case of war. The same document revealed that 90.5 percent of 18- to 25-year-old men were registered in 2020; by 2023 only 84.2 percent were registered.

That said, Hasbrouck pointed out in 2024 that "most men register eventually, but often years after their prime draft eligibility. The SSS allows men to register without penalty until their 26th birthday. Some men deliberately or inadvertently delay registering until they are close to age 26. This minimizes their exposure to a possible draft while preserving their eligibility for federal or state jobs or other programs later in life."

The records are actually less accurate than official data suggests. Men 18 to 25 are supposed to update address changes within 10 days, but few bother. Draft registration records that don't contain current contact information do the government little good.

To deal with its compliance problem, Selective Service has pushed automatic registration for years. In its 2024 annual report, the agency said it sought to "automatically enroll eligible individuals by leveraging existing databases, ensuring compliance without requiring additional action on the registrants' part." It added that 46 states and territories already had "laws enabling constituents to register when obtaining a driver's license, learner's permit, or state identification card." My son was automatically registered when he got his Arizona driver's license. The 2026 NDAA enacts Selective Service's long-desired national policy.

Little Public Enthusiasm for Conscription

But the move towards easing military conscription flies in the face of Americans' preferences.

A May 2026 Overton Insights poll asked, "If President Trump implemented a military draft, would you support or oppose it?" Two-thirds of respondents strongly (59 percent) or somewhat (7 percent) opposed the idea of a military draft. Only a quarter strongly (11 percent) or somewhat (14 percent) supported the idea. Note that even 41 percent of Republicans opposed implementing a hypothetical Trump-chosen military draft (43 percent supported it). Eighty percent of independents and 86 of Democrats opposed the idea of a draft.

It's worth pointing out that the poll frames the implementation of a military draft not just as a presidential power, but one exercised by the current White House inhabitant. In fact, while draft registration is mandatory, it would take an act of Congress to reinstate the draft itself. That would spread responsibility and likely make responses less partisan. But there's little evidence of enthusiasm for reinstating conscription. There might be even less for the new automated registration system that grants the Selective Service System access to information from a host of unrelated sources.

"In reality, this means the federal government will now access databases from state Departments of Motor Vehicles, the Socal Security Administration [sic], and the Census Bureau to gather information to register young men automatically, without their consent," objects the Friends Committee on National Legislation. "This change also threatens the rights of conscientious objectors. Automatic registration removes the opportunity for individuals' moral decision making."

Automatic registration will take us closer to the day when the government unifies data storage for general use and enforcement. That might be a gain for efficiency, but it's not obvious that we should want government officials to be able to more efficiently inflict every rule and whim on the population.

One effect of automatic registration is that it's reminded some young Americans that they have skin in the game. There's been a revival of long largely dormant public pushback by individuals and organizations opposed to conscription. Last month, Sens. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.), Rand Paul (R–Ky.), and Cynthia Lummis (R–Wyo.) introduced a bill to repeal the Selective Service Act, abolish draft registration, and eliminate penalties for failing to register.

Failing passage of the bill or other relevant legislative changes, draft registration becomes automatic for 18-year-olds in December 2026.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Bad Memory

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

PoliticsMilitarySoldiersData CollectionTrump AdministrationPentagonDefenseWar
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (48)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Minadin   2 months ago

    Register young women too. They demanded equality.

    1. creech   2 months ago

      Congresswoman Houlahan won't tell her constituents if she favors registering females too.

    2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Look, unless we draft an army of biologists, we will never figure out who is a what, and what is a who. So just draft everyone.

      1. middlefinger   2 months ago

        Came here to say /repeat Justice Jackson’s wise words.

  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    What difference, at this point, does it make?

    1. psmoot   2 months ago

      SSS registration hasn't been pointful since the day Carter re-instated it in the '70s.

      (Anyone remember the history? We stopped the draft, then the USSR invaded Afghanistan, and Carter restarted registration as a way to object. Boy, that showed 'em!)

      Seriously, in what world do we anticipate drafting a million grunts to fight on the front lines? We should have shut down the SSS 40 years ago.

  3. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

    How is this different from mandatory selective service registration? I mean beyond as a simple hit piece

    1. Rossami   2 months ago

      As the article already points out, not really different at all. In fact, it's exactly the same mandatory selective service registration - it's just being done automatically instead of forcing people to fill out a form telling the government information they already know.

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        Yeah, the problem is selective service being a thing at all. And the federal government having everyone's personal information.

  4. Jerry B.   2 months ago

    Draft em all.

  5. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    I never tailgate, I draft

  6. Heresolong   2 months ago

    The argument for registration is that if Congress ever felt the need to reinstitute a draft, it would then take years to compile a list of eligible individuals. I tend to think that's a good argument in favor of keeping the registration.

    As far as the poll goes, why have a poll that asks about a fictional Presidential power without pointing out that it's not a Presidential power? To gin up opposition to the current President, of course. How many of those respondents now think that it's something he could actually do?

    1. creech   2 months ago

      Years in this age of computers?

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        Electronic tracking, social media, facial recognition.

        We are on our way to the dystopian society.

      2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Years? That’s ridiculous. Commuters are twice as fast as they were in 1973.

        1. CE   2 months ago

          My commute takes longer though. The roads are really crowded now.

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      And I tend to think that's a good argument for doing away with the registration altogether. As well as everything else that requires the government to keep tons of personal data of citizens. Get rid of income tax and social security and there's no good reason for the federal government to even know who you are.

    3. psmoot   2 months ago

      "...if Congress ever felt a need to reinstitute a draft."

      You can stop right there. We don't need a draft. We haven't for decades. Future wars will not be fought with masses of cannon fodder humping up a hill, it'll be fought with drones and AI.

      If you want to sign up a 100,000 gamers to blow shit up for real rather than in Call of Duty, I don't think you'll have much trouble just hiring them. Mass drafting of soldiers is as obsolete as cavalry charges.

      1. CE   2 months ago

        The Army won't even need to draft them. Just release the war as a new multi-player reality game, and people will sign up for it. As a bonus, you actually get paid.

    4. jonnysage   2 months ago

      Its unconstitutional. Thats the only argument in favor of striking the law. There is no power to draft in the constitution and there IS a prohibition on forced labor.

  7. JFree   2 months ago

    This is what happens when states abdicate their responsibility to initiate the organization of the militia. Instead, the feds do it and do so in the service of a standing army and a castrated rotting Congress.

    1. Agammamon   2 months ago

      Uhm, the National Guard is state militias. It is also the federal militia. Since, like, 1903. You're a century too late.

      1. Winston in Wonderland   2 months ago

        The National Guard didn't become a Federal thing until 1916. Prior to that, some states referred to their militias as a National Guard.

      2. CE   2 months ago

        Texas still has a State Guard, in addition to their National Guard.

  8. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

    Requirement to register already exists. This just makes the registration automatic. It will save some people headaches later when they apply to a college.

    I never registered because I was already a PFC in the Marine Corps on my 18th birthday. Later when I enrolled in college, I learned I was non-compliant. Ends up, if you leave the service before your 26th birthday you have to register. Who the hell knew that?

    I had to write a letter to the selective service board explaining my non-compliace and they didn't actually excuse me but they said the reason was valid and sent me a letter saying no-one can hold it against me.

    Automatic registration would have saved me that hassle.

    1. Agammamon   2 months ago

      >Ends up, if you leave the service before your 26th birthday you have to register. Who the hell knew that?

      They were mistaken.

      Unless you were kicked out, everyone has an 8 year initial commitment - we are all in from 18-26, part of that is on AD, the rest in the IRR.

      So you left active duty but you were still 'in' until you finished up that 8 years.

      1. Restoring the Dream   2 months ago

        Nope. When I left they tried to get me to register, until they saw I was 27.

  9. BYODB   2 months ago

    Just to note the obvious retardation:

    It isn't selective service if the potential draftee is automatically assigned a theoretical branch they'd serve in if drafted.

    The selective part is where you mark down what branch you'd prefer, which I'm assuming the system in question marks everyone down as an army bullet catcher.

    Of course, what you 'select' probably wouldn't matter anyway but with it becoming automatic they might as well just rename the whole idiot thing.

    1. Joe   2 months ago

      Per Google Gemini:

      In the United States Selective Service System (the military draft), the word "selective" refers to the process of choosing only specific individuals for military service based on criteria like fitness, age, and exemptions, rather than drafting the entire population at once.

      1. Liberty_Belle   2 months ago

        "The Government Selects You" program. Fortunately I never had to deal with it.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Congratulations! You may already have been selected to receive a flag to drape over your coffin.

    2. Agammamon   2 months ago

      You don't provide a preferred service when registering for SS.

      Full name
      Home address
      Date of Birth
      Social Security Number

      1. BYODB   2 months ago

        Yep, I'm apparently an idiot. I'm honestly not sure what I was thinking of, but I could have sworn I had to select a branch when filling mine out forever ago.

  10. Ron   2 months ago

    this is not a big deal and rally not even worth an article.

    1. JFree   2 months ago

      It is a big deal. Not the registration but the entity doing it. If the state handled this, it is the state that would turn the individual into a militia and the feds would federalize that militia as units - as the Constitution requires. With the feds doing this, the feds are the ones who are turning individuals into 'a militia' and the conscription is as an individual.

      There is no possibility of an individual having an impact on war by the nation. There is a huge possibility that states - and individuals who have already trained as militia - and lower level officers who are appointed by the states - can have a huge impact re any war outside the US.

      1. psmoot   2 months ago

        I'm with Ron. SSS is entirely pointless and I don't think the registrations are worth the paper they're written on. I'm far more worried about a meteor strike than the US resuming drafting soldiers.

        Given that, and given that I have no doubt the SSS could gin up a list of 18-26yos in a heartbeat if need be, we might as well make the process as low-overhead as possible.

        Of course, just shutting down the entire SSS would be the lowest overhead but let's not go crazy here.

        1. JFree   2 months ago

          The US resuming drafting soldiers is what will reduce permawar. I don't like the former but the latter is gonna kill the US - and there is no other way to reduce permawar.

  11. Agammamon   2 months ago

    >and the government wants to gloss over that mass rejection by potential draftees.

    Don't confuse ignorance with rejection.

    Hardly anyone has ever registered with Selective Service without some specific reason - generally applying for a job that checks on that or a special program that requires it - and someone putting the paperwork in front of them.

    I'm Gen-X - we barely knew the thing existed and no one knew how to register. You think Millennials and Gen-Z have any idea?

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      I think the most common reason people register is applying for federal financial aid for college.

      1. Agammamon   2 months ago

        Pretty much.

        With far fewer men going to college its not surprising that the numbers for compliance are dropping - but I believe more because of ignorance rather than deliberate rejection of the draft.

  12. Winston in Wonderland   2 months ago

    A few decades ago, I registered for Selective Service at my local post office. A few months later, I enlisted and was surprised to learn that even while I was residing in one of Uncle Sam's barracks, I still had to keep the draft board apprised of my whereabouts.

    After completing my stint in the military, I had to update them every time I changed address until I was 45 years old.

    So...I think doing this automatically is a very good idea.

    1. MasterThief   2 months ago

      The draft is immoral when improperly used for foreign adventurism as in Vietnam. I don't have a problem with it if it can only be used to defend the homeland.
      Too many want the privileges of being in America without any responsibility or loyalty to this nation. If you can't vow to do what you can to protect this nation then you shouldn't be granted access to our political process. Our system has been corrupted by too many voters having no real skin in the game.

      1. Winston in Wonderland   2 months ago

        Everybody who has the right to vote (lookin' a you, ladies) should be subject to the draft.

  13. CE   2 months ago

    How much "digging through databases" will they have to do? Hasn't everyone been required to get an SS number at birth since about 1987 (meaning everyone under 40)? (At least if their parents wanted to claim them as a tax deduction, which pretty much everyone does.)

    1. Winston in Wonderland   2 months ago

      I think the whole point is that it's now so easy to do automatically that there is no reason to 18 year-old boys to trudge down to the post office to fill-out the forms.

  14. Big Ed's Landing   2 months ago

    Draft Baron Trump!

  15. Dan S.   2 months ago

    I always figured they could do this if they wanted to. Certainly, with today's ubiquitous digital records, they can. So they might as well. Sure, a draft would be wrong. But pointlessly exposing young men to prosecution for failure to register is worse than doing things this way. Removing that threat (or that of ineligibility for Federal jobs or loans) from people for not pro-actively registering is a good thing.

    1. Winston in Wonderland   2 months ago

      As I indicated in my previous post, I hadn't realized that I still needed to keep my registration up-to-date (address changes) while I was actually serving in the Armed Forces and for two decades after I completed my 6 year stint.

      Not particularly intuitive, and I have heard of more than one vet who got into trouble for not notifying authorities when he moved.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Research Suggests Trump and His Opponents Are Both Wrong About the Impact of Voter ID Requirements

Jacob Sullum | 7.20.2026 5:25 PM

South Carolina Law Prohibits Tattoo Parlors Near Churches. A New Lawsuit Calls That Unconstitutional.

Meagan O'Rourke | 7.20.2026 4:59 PM

Britain's New Prime Minister Andy Burnham Promises 'Stronger Public Control' of Stagnating Economy

Reem Ibrahim | 7.20.2026 2:16 PM

A Man Died of COVID at This California Detention Center. A Judge Just Ordered Sweeping Improvements There.

C.J. Ciaramella | 7.20.2026 1:35 PM

The Iran War Is Back, Sort Of

Matthew Petti | 7.20.2026 1:21 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Reason's July 4 Special!

For America's 250th, Get 2 Years of Reason for $17.76

Celebrate your independence with a subscription to Reason magazine, your most trusted source of honest, insightful news and analysis.

Subscribe to Reason