Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Free Trade

Trump's New European Car Tariffs Demonstrate Why His 'Deals' Are Worthless

A trade deal that can be terminated by one person at any time and for any reason isn't really a trade deal at all.

Eric Boehm | 5.4.2026 2:50 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
An assembly line at a car factory, with Donald Trump pointing towards the viewer in the background | Illustration: Lex Villena; Midjourney
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Midjourney)

When President Donald Trump struck a trade deal with the European Union in July, officials on both sides stressed how it would ensure long-term stability to trans-Atlantic trade.

The Trump administration called the deal a "generational modernization of the transatlantic alliance." European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said it "restores stability and predictability" by locking in 15 percent tariffs on most European goods exported to the U.S., while most American imports to Europe would be exempt from tariffs.

In other words, Trump got what he wanted out of that deal: A reduction in tariffs on American exports and the establishment of a new, permanent baseline tariff on European goods. European leaders also felt like they'd won something: the 15 percent tariff was lower than the 25 percent tariff Trump had threatened, and the deal would stop Trump from hiking tariffs the next time he was in a bad mood.

So much for that.

On Friday, Trump announced that he would raise tariffs on European-made cars to 25 percent. (Those tariffs are authorized by Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, so they are not affected by the Supreme Court's ruling in February that limited some of the president's power to impose tariffs unilaterally.)

Those higher tariffs could cost automakers $4 billion this year.

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the tariff hike was in response to the E.U. "not complying with our fully agreed to Trade Deal."

The trade deal, however, is not fully agreed to, so it is hard to understand how the Europeans could be breaking it. The E.U. is still in the process of ratifying it—even though it cleared the main legislative hurdle in March—and the Trump administration has not even asked Congress to approve it. Adding to the confusion is the fact that European trade officials visited the White House just weeks ago, and everyone seemed to be getting along. After that meeting, the U.S. and E.U. announced a new joint partnership for some strategically important minerals.

Trump's sudden decision to hike tariffs has now put the entire deal at risk—and once again escalated tensions with Europe.

Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's International Trade Committee, wrote on Twitter that Trump's sudden tariff hike was "unacceptable."

"Trust is good, but against arbitrariness, only clear rules help," he added.

He's right. Friday's announcement reveals, once again, how little any trading partner can trust Trump. The president's word is effectively worthless, and his "deals" are subject to change at any time, for any reason. Who would enter into serious negotiations with someone like that?

Convincing other countries to negotiate better trading terms with the U.S. had been a central promise of Trump's tariff regime. But this new spat over imported cars shows that Trump still doesn't understand why trade deals matter in the first place.

The whole point of a trade deal is to provide stability for individuals and businesses as they plan transactions and capital investments. A 15 percent tariff is costly, but a 15 percent tariff that can be hiked to 25 percent (or higher) at the drop of a hat will have consequences that go well beyond the higher taxes.

That means Trump's threat to blow up the E.U. trade deal also undermines the ability of private citizens and businesses in other parts of the world to invest in the United States.

A tariff increase would "threaten the progress that has already been made to open EU markets and grow the U.S. auto industry," Jennifer Safavian, CEO of Autos Drive America, an industry group, told the Associated Press.

Those tariffs would be another blow to an auto industry that's already suffering from America's tariffs on steel and aluminum, and from the ongoing costs of Trump's illegal war with Iran. Thanks to the tariffs and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, aluminum prices are 90 percent higher than they were one year ago, The Wall Street Journal reports.

It's not clear what Trump hopes to accomplish by slapping higher tariffs on European cars. Indeed, it's not even clear why he made this decision.

Regardless, a trade "deal" that can be torn up by one person at the drop of a hat is not really a trade deal at all. That's why Congress must take away presidential power over tariffs.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Condemning Nicotine Pouches, Trump's Surgeon General Nominee Reveals Her Hostility to Harm Reduction

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

Free TradeTariffsTrump AdministrationDonald TrumpEuropeEuropean UnionAutomobilesImports
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (18)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Spiritus Mundi   3 hours ago

    A trade deal that can be terminated by one person at any time and for any reason isn't really a trade deal at all.

    Is this not always the case? Can a CEO, one singular person, decide his company is going to jack up prices, or simply stop selling to a particular market. Sometimes they decide to fire everybody and shut the whole thing down.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SQRLSY   2 hours ago

      Twatabout CEOs and Hillary-Bob and Billary-Blob? Twatabout Pelosi?

      Butt, whatabout that them thar whatabouts? Twatabout Hillary? Whatabout OJ Simpson?

      How many brain cells does it take to run a socio-political simulation on the following:

      Judge and Jury: “Murderer, we find you guilty of murder! 20 years in the hoosegow for YOU! Now OFF with ye!”

      Murderer: “But OJ Simpson got off for murder, why not me? We’re all equal, and need to be treated likewise-equal!”

      Judge and Jury: “Oh, yes, sure, we forgot about that! You’re free to go! Have a good life, and try not to murder too many MORE people, please! Goodbye!”

      Now WHERE does this line of thinking and acting lead to? Think REALLY-REALLY HARD now, please! What ABOUT OJ Simpson, now? Can we make progress towards peace & justice in this fashion?

      (Ass for me, I think we should have PUT THE SQUEEZE on OJ!)

      Log in to Reply
    2. MollyGodiva   2 hours ago

      Companies sign contracts, which are legally enforceable.

      Log in to Reply
      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 hours ago

        EU admitted they hadn't followed through on last years trade agreement dummy.

        Log in to Reply
        1. Dillinger   14 minutes ago

          performance clauses aren't part of legally enforceable contracts oh wait

          Log in to Reply
  2. Fu Manchu   2 hours ago

    I'm so glad we have our guy Trump to pick winners and losers based on the day of the week.

    Log in to Reply
    1. SQRLSY   2 hours ago

      That's an unfair and unkind cut to Dear Orange Leader, Bleeder of the peons!

      (Shit ALSO depends on whether shit is on the outrageous rage-rag on a given craven day, to be more fair.)

      Log in to Reply
    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 hours ago

      Amazing how little you care to actually see beyond what ever spoon fed maddow narrative you get.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Fu Manchu   1 hour ago

        Maddow really lives rent free in that little shriveled up brain of yours. And also in that little shriveled up dick of yours.

        Log in to Reply
        1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   26 minutes ago

          No, I just recognize leftist retard talking points with a disregard to actual facts when I see it.

          Log in to Reply
  3. NealAppeal   2 hours ago

    Congress will get on that right after they pass a budget.

    Log in to Reply
  4. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 hours ago

    Hey Eric, buddy, moron...

    The EU has not yet implemented their agreements for reduced tariffs on imports on the US, blaming bureaucratic delays.

    The EU has pushed back against that claim. European officials argue that the bloc is still implementing the agreement through its normal legislative process. Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s trade committee, criticized the U.S. move as “unacceptable” and said it showed the United States had become an unreliable trading partner.

    Which is why the action was taken.

    https://mfginternational.com/manufacturing-international/manufacturing-international-news/the-truth-about-eu-automotive-tariffs-and-their-impact-on-the-united-states/

    Historically, EU tariffs have tilted the playing field against U.S. automakers:

    Passenger cars (HS 8703): 10% MFN duty

    Light trucks & vans (HS 8704): 10–22%

    Auto parts (HS 8708): 3–4.5%

    This is yet another example of you not being intellectually curious and preferring simple mainstream narratives.

    Log in to Reply
  5. Social Justice is neither   2 hours ago

    Wait until Eric the retard finds about commitments to fund NATO or the UN or the trade restrictions in the EU. Boy is he going to be pissed.

    Log in to Reply
    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   1 hour ago

      The Eric's and the sarcs of the world view the US as an abused piggy bank. They don't care when other actors violate agreements.

      Log in to Reply
  6. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 hour ago

    Article I, Section 8, Clause 1:

    The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts

    Log in to Reply
  7. Dillinger   1 hour ago

    dude just stop trying to understand T. you don't. go read Don Quixote

    Log in to Reply
  8. Neutral not Neutered   1 hour ago

    https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/aluminum

    Strange as it is Aluminum prices have not reached where they did in 2022 and this has nothing to do with tariffs.

    We live in a world with markets. These markets fluctuate and are driven by many forces.

    "Thanks to the tariffs and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, aluminum prices are 90 percent higher than they were one year ago,"

    ^^^ This is a lie.

    Log in to Reply
  9. Homer Thompson   14 minutes ago

    merz should have kept his mouth shut

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

California Says It Detected a Disease-Carrying Bug. So it Destroyed 32,000 Trees, 5 Miles Away.

Meagan O'Rourke | 5.4.2026 4:18 PM

Trump's New European Car Tariffs Demonstrate Why His 'Deals' Are Worthless

Eric Boehm | 5.4.2026 2:50 PM

Condemning Nicotine Pouches, Trump's Surgeon General Nominee Reveals Her Hostility to Harm Reduction

Jacob Sullum | 5.4.2026 2:20 PM

How a Bill Banning AI Companions for Kids Could Usher in Widespread ID Checks Online

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.4.2026 11:51 AM

Project Freedom

Liz Wolfe | 5.4.2026 9:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks