Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Movies

The Zendaya Romance The Drama Is Weirder and More Uncomfortable Than You Expect

A movie about marriage, memory, and the difficulty of knowing another person.

Peter Suderman | 4.3.2026 9:50 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Zendaya and Robert Pattinson in "The Drama" | The Drama/A24
(The Drama/A24)

The first thing you need to know about The Drama is that it's not what you expect. Like really, really not what you expect. 

The marketing has positioned the film as an awkward twist on the rom-com with a pair of hot young stars, Robert Pattinson and Zendaya, batting eyes at each other as they stumble and mumble their way to a wedding. It's got the A24 imprimatur and a low-light, Instagram aesthetic that suggests a skeptical, modern take on young love. It's been sold as a very conventional kind of unconventional romance. 

And, well, it is that—sort of. But it's much weirder, much darker, and much more uncomfortable than you've been led to assume. It's a movie about marriage and mind games, social taboos, and the difficulty of ever knowing, much less loving, another human being. It should have been called The Psychodrama. 

Zendaya and Pattinson play Emma and Charlie, a young couple living in Boston. Their relationship begins with an amusing meet-cute in a coffee shop, when Charlie pretends to like the book she's reading even though he hasn't read it. Eventually he comes clean, they move in together, and soon they're engaged. 

On the cusp of their wedding, as they're trying out wedding food with another couple—the best man and maid of honor—they have a little too much to drink and decide to play a game. What's the worst thing each of them has ever done? 

They all reveal something suitably awful yet sort of funny, mostly impulsive, antisocial acts from their youth. And then Emma reveals, well, something about herself. Something that no one knows how to respond to. Something that changes everything. 

To say much more would be to spoil the movie's central provocation, which amounts to the breaking, or at least bending, of a major cultural taboo. Neither Charlie nor the friends know quite what to do. And what ensues is, yes, a lot of drama. 

Written and directed by Kristoffer Borgli, whose last film was the surrealist Nic Cage picture Dream Scenario, the film traffics in a similar sort of psycho-social strangeness, with dreamlike imagery interspersing scenes of Charlie's escalating mania as he struggles to make sense of Emma's revelation. 

It's a tricky tonal balance. Her confession is clearly meant to shock and upset viewers. It's also supposed to be funny. Borgli not only manages to achieve both, he often manages to achieve both at the same time, often without a single clear directive as to which is appropriate. It's a movie that's intentionally, and effectively, designed to make viewers feel emotionally confused. 

That emotional confusion stems partly from a sort of social confusion, as both the characters and viewers are confronted with a scenario for which there is no clear cultural playbook. The movie seems to be reacting against the common-on-social-media notion of situations that demand a single, obvious, uniform social and emotional response. Sometimes there is no clearly correct way to respond to a difficult or upsetting event. Sometimes reality demands, or at least supports, multiple conflicting and contradictory responses. 

Occasionally, the film strains credulity in its psychological complexities. There are Big Ideas that it gestures at but can't fully support. And the cringe-shock of its big reveal will almost certainly divide viewers, especially those expecting something more conventional. 

But the movie's strength is in its human smallness. It never feels like a sociological treatise or a series of tweets about how We Live In a Society. Instead, it's a movie about people, and how they are strange and difficult and impossible to know. It's a movie about marriage and relationships, and how even the most intimate partnerships involve telling lies and stories about yourself, and reintroducing yourself over and over again. 

It's drama. It's life. It's a pretty good movie. 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Bye-Bye, Bondi 

Peter Suderman is features editor at Reason.

MoviesCancel CulturePsychology/PsychiatryBostonGenderHollywoodCulture
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (10)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 hours ago

    Zendaya is in this? Spoiler alert!

    Log in to Reply
    1. yet another dave   2 hours ago

      The only thing I want to know is, does Tom Holland know Zendaya (last name unknown) is banging Robert Pattinson?

      Log in to Reply
  2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 hours ago

    Ugh.

    Log in to Reply
  3. Agammamon   1 hour ago

    Peter, you can do spoilers here - no one who reads Reason is going to see these movies anyway;)

    Log in to Reply
    1. Zeb   28 minutes ago

      I was curious, so I looked it up (because I'm never going to see this movie).
      SPOILER ALERT!
      She planned but didn't carry out a school shooting. Which is a really annoying trope.

      Log in to Reply
      1. Rick James   23 minutes ago

        Wait, what? Are you serious? That's what Suderman is referring to as a "social taboo"?

        *facepalm*

        Edit: If you're serious, now I'll definitely never watch this movie. I thought it was going to be something interesting.

        Log in to Reply
        1. MasterThief   10 minutes ago

          Exactly. I Know What You Did Last Summer is edgier.
          Run Hide Fight was an entertaining movie about a school shooting. I'll watch that again rather than a social drama around a girl once having an unhealthy obsession with murder that she never acted on.
          Human Centipede and Tusk exist. This is some tame shit and it is a disservice to sell it as more interesting than it is.

          Log in to Reply
        2. Zeb   9 minutes ago

          That's what Wikipedia tells me. Was pretty disappointing after the mysterious buildup here.

          Log in to Reply
          1. Rick James   47 seconds ago

            List of possible social taboos in a dark rom-com, in no particular order, one doesn't belong:

            She had a threesome with her former boyfriend
            She's the Pele of Anal
            Raped and enjoyed it
            Considered being a school shooter
            Was a serial cheater
            Got busy with a family member
            Goes dogging in the park

            Call me old fashioned, but I don't blush, cover my mouth and fan myself while saying, "Oh wow, I never would have thought!" when someone tells me they fantasized about shooting dozens of people.

            Log in to Reply
  4. MasterThief   19 minutes ago

    Since Suderman is a bitch who won't explain the central conflict, I'll spoil it.
    She planned a school shooting but didn't follow through.
    It's surely a touchy subject considering the number of trannies shooting up schools lately, but being real It's sort of a lame thing to be the central conflict. Besides romance novels, women in general are obsessed with murderers and true crime dramas. Many of them have likely put thought into how they would kill someone; especially their husbands.
    Wasn't interested before and definitely not interested now. I also have to laugh at Suderman characterizing them as a young couple when Pattison is about 40.

    Log in to Reply

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Colorado Becomes First State To Protect Defendants Against Faulty Roadside Drug Tests 

C.J. Ciaramella | 4.3.2026 11:55 AM

The Zendaya Romance The Drama Is Weirder and More Uncomfortable Than You Expect

Peter Suderman | 4.3.2026 9:50 AM

Bye-Bye, Bondi 

Peter Suderman | 4.3.2026 9:30 AM

The Republican Plan To Nationalize Elections Is Performative Nonsense

Steven Greenhut | 4.3.2026 7:30 AM

Review: Church Committee Report on Illegal Spying Is Relevant Again in the Trump Era

C.J. Ciaramella | From the May 2026 issue

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks