After Paying Illegal Tariffs, Will Small Businesses Get a Refund? 'I'm Not Holding My Breath.'
Even if the refunds are made, business owners say they won't cover all the additional costs created by Trump's chaotic trade policies.
After being charged billions of dollars under President Donald Trump's unlawful tariff scheme, American business owners are now facing the prospect of a lengthy, costly process to obtain refunds—payments that some expect will never arrive.
"I'm not holding my breath," Brandon Eley, founder and president of 2BigFeet, a Georgia-based designer and retailer of large-sized footwear, told Reason in an interview this week.
Eley says 2BigFeet paid more than $10,000 in tariffs last year to import shoes from China and Brazil. The cost of the tariffs led him to lay off a product designer and postpone shipping on several new product lines.
With a small staff and no capacity to hire trade attorneys, small businesses like Eley's are stuck just waiting to see what happens with the refunds.
The Supreme Court ruled two weeks ago that Trump acted illegally when he imposed those tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Thousands of businesses have filed requests for refunds, but Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says those payments could take "months" to litigate.
"It's really frustrating because so many businesses that could be growing the U.S. economy are hurting massively right now," Cassie Abel, founder and CEO of Wild Rye, an outdoor clothing company based in Idaho, told Reason.
Abel's business, which she launched in 2016, sells biking, hiking, and snow sports apparel to women and relies on supply chains that stretch from Italy to China. She says Wild Rye was hit with more than $500,000 in tariff payments over the past year—enough to force her to hike prices on consumers and pause plans to hire additional employees.
On Wednesday, the Court of International Trade ordered Customs and Border Protection to provide immediate refunds to importers who had paid the tariffs now invalidated by the Supreme Court. The administration is likely to appeal that ruling.
The administration could also try other tactics, like delaying "liquidation"—the technical term for Customs and Border Protection's final decision regarding the accuracy of an importer's customs entry, including the value of the goods and how they were categorized for tariff payments. That process is supposed to be finished within 314 days, but the treasury secretary has the power to delay liquidation by up to three years on certain entries, including to ensure "compliance with applicable law."
With all of that in play, some business owners aren't banking on those refunds.
"I feel like small companies like ours are going to be at the end. If we get a dime, it's going to be at the very end," said Eley.
More than 2,000 businesses have already sued over the refunds—including some big names like FedEx and Costco. Still, the $175 billion of unlawfully collected IEEPA tariffs came from more than 300,000 different importers, according to government data reviewed by Bloomberg. Many, and probably most, of those businesses will lack the resources for a protracted legal fight over the refunds—particularly as they brace for the additional tariffs Trump announced in the wake of last month's Supreme Court ruling.
Slow walking the refunds might be a deliberate strategy by the Trump administration, which seems to be preparing for a "war of attrition" against American small businesses, says Scott Lincicome, vice president of general economics at the Cato Institute.
If litigation over the refunds takes years, as Trump has suggested, then some businesses might decide it's not worth paying thousands of dollars in legal fees to fight it out in court. That means the government might get to keep some of those unlawfully collected taxes just because it made the refund process so complicated and costly.
"You're talking about a situation where it could take several years of litigation, and could even have to go back to the Supreme Court," Lincicome says. "There is a chance this is going to leave out a lot of small businesses, and that's really unfortunate."
It could also be unfortunate for taxpayers, who might end up on the hook for interest payments on those tariff refunds. In a response to the Court of International Trade this week, the executive director of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's office of trade told the Court of International Trade that "applicable law" requires that "any validated refund of IEEPA duties would include interest."
Cato's calculations show that the government could end up owing $23 million for every day that the refunds go unpaid. That's $700 million per month and roughly $3 billion if courts grant the administration's request for a 120-day delay in judgment.
Getting the money back would be a big help, of course, but Abel says it wouldn't cover all the additional costs she absorbed due to the tariffs. Like the payment made for expedited shipping on an order last summer to beat the deadline when tariffs would increase. Or the anxiety that she had to see a doctor to treat last year.
"It's taken a physical toll, it's taken an emotional toll, it's been a huge drain on resources," she says. "It feels like we're being crippled. Our government is working against U.S. businesses."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
I was always told the consumer was paying.
American businesses had the choice to eat the tariff cost or pass it to the consumer. It is most like a combination of the two choices with businesses passing on what the consumer market would accept. Small businesses were in the weakest position to pass the cost on and the weakest position to get a refund.
Except weve already seen who actually paid for it with PPI and CPI data. 40% of importers are vertically aligned dummy.
No, there's not going to be any refunds.
the line forms right over there for the refunds ... there ... right over there ... you can be first
A few points for idiot Eric to think about.
1) roberts said tariff delegation was constitutional. Just the wrong justification was used. Meaning the other justifications remain valid.
2) suing the federal government for a refund under prior assumed constitutional usage never results in refunds.
3) the J6ers who had to pay fines over the misuse of a law were never refunded the fines. Courts even upheld the fines after the SCOTUS decision.
4) you've claimed for a year that tariffs are mostly pass through to consumers, which if true means zero harm to the companies. Can't change your argument now.
I have long held that Donald Trump is a confidence man scamming the public. Like most scams the money goes easy, is hard to get back, and in many cases never completely returned. It is best to move on and now the question for the American public is whether the lesson is learned?
Lol. Many your parody is getting better.