Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Gun Rights

The ATF Created a Backdoor Gun Registry. Lawmakers Want an Explanation.

Federal law bans the creation of a gun registry, but regulators made one anyway.

J.D. Tuccille | 2.13.2026 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
A semiautomatic handgun and some papers on a desk. | Illustration: Midjourney
(Illustration: Midjourney)

It has been illegal since 1986 for the federal government to establish a national firearms registry. As you might expect of the sort of people who gravitate to government employment, the bureaucrats at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), enabled by Biden-era policy changes, have taken that as a challenge. Now, members of Congress want answers from the federal gun cops about a vast gun registry database that could threaten the liberty and privacy of firearms owners. They have been stonewalled so far.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Lawmakers Question an Illegal Gun Registry

On February 3, Rep. Michael Cloud (R–Texas) and 26 other members of Congress wrote to the ATF asking about the status of a year-old query that the regulatory agency has ignored. The original 2025 letter inquired about the ATF's collection of Form 4473 firearms transaction records, which are filled out in the course of every firearms sale by a licensed dealer, from gun vendors that have gone out of business. These records have accumulated and turned into a gun registry in waiting.

"We fear that ATF could have as many as 1.1-billion-gun registration records in its database, if ATF has continued with this historic pace and digitalized an average of 50 million firearm transaction records per year," the members of Congress reminded the ATF in the recent letter. "This is a violation of the federal prohibition on gun registration at 18 U.S.C. 926(a)(3)."

The source of concern for the 27 members of Congress is not only the de facto registry—though that's disturbing enough—but that it has seemingly been created in defiance of a specific prohibition. Under the Firearms Owners' Protection Act, which became law in 1986, "no such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act may require that…any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established."

However, that law also contained the seeds of mischief by requiring gun dealers to maintain sales records that, if they go out of business, must be surrendered to the government. For decades, dealers could purge older records, surrendering only more recent ones to the ATF if they closed their doors. That changed under the Biden administration.

ATF Builds on a Biden-Era Policy Change

"In 2022, the ATF finalized a rule requiring FFLs to maintain firearm transaction records indefinitely instead of destroying them after 20 years," Del Schlangen wrote in 2024 for the University of Wyoming College of Law's Firearms Research Center. "This move, along with the ATF's 'zero-tolerance' guidance for revoking FFL licenses, has further fueled concerns about the potential for a federal gun registry."

Schlangen also noted that instead of the masses of paper retained in the past, the ATF was now converting firearm transaction records to electronic format, and "as of 2021, the ATF had digitized over 50 million out-of-business records in that year alone."

That figure wasn't advertised by the Biden administration. Instead, the Gun Owners of America (GOA) gained access to internal ATF documents revealing that in 2021, the regulatory agency processed 54.7 million out-of-business records—mostly paper, but some submitted in increasingly common digital format. Those records quickly added up.

In response to a 2021 query from Cloud, who has turned the backdoor gun registry into a crusade, the gun bureaucrats conceded that "ATF manages 920,664,765 OBR [out of business records] as of November 2021. This includes digital and an estimated number of hard copy records that are awaiting image conversion. It is currently estimated that 865,787,086 of those records are in digitalized format."

But the Registry Isn't Searchable! Sort of.

A May 2022 report from GOA based on freedom of information requests revealed that the ATF stored these records in searchable PDF and JPEG formats. The agency claims it's in compliance with the law banning gun registries, though, because the resulting database isn't searchable by name. But that's apparently a choice that can be altered at any time.

"It appears the only reason ATF's registry is not searchable by name is because ATF has merely disabled the ability for its software to search that particular record field," notes the GOA report. "Of course, something that is so easily disabled could be easily re-enabled."

Besides, the report adds, "ATF records reveal its gun registry to be searchable by weapon type, make, model, serial number, and caliber, among other functions."

In fact, proponents of a gun registry used the searchability of the Out of Business Records Imaging System (OBRIS) as a selling point after the attempted assassination of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. After the would-be assassin was killed, law enforcement agents seized his rifle with hopes of retrieving details based on the serial number.

"They were able to do so in about 30 minutes," Perry Stein reported for The Washington Post. "The search used sale records from an out-of-business gun store that the government is required to collect—but that Republican lawmakers and the gun lobby would like to place off-limits."

Well, yes. Advocates of self-defense and of gun ownership in general oppose a gun registry because they fear it could lead to gun confiscation, as politicians including former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris keep threatening. That's why they successfully pushed to make a registry illegal. And a searchable database of gun sales that has had the search function for names temporarily disabled is a gun registry waiting to be activated. The fact that it has been built at all shows a bureaucracy champing at the bit to escape restrictions on its power.

As Rep. Cloud commented last week, "the American people have a right to know if their government is maintaining an unlawful registry of firearms and firearm owners in direct violation of U.S. code and the Second Amendment."

Government Incompetence Is the Only Saving Grace

The only saving grace is that if the federal government ever flips the switch on that gun database, it's going to be a mess. Records that are 10, 20, or 30 years out of date will have been superseded by the passage of time. Gun owners will have moved, divorced and divided their property, died and left their possessions to their heirs, lost guns, or transferred them in private transactions. Or they'll just claim that their guns are long gone in tragic boating accidents.

But when has the federal government ever done anything especially well? Incompetence has never prevented government officials from taking on big projects like gun registries, and from damaging liberty as they do so.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Review: The Anarchist Writings of Robert Anton Wilson

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Gun Rightsgun registrationBATFGunsGun OwnersCongressfirearms regulation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (45)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

    Start of article says...

    "It has been illegal since 1986 for the federal government to establish a national forearms registry."

    Everyone except amputees and assorted cripples has snot just one, butt TWO, forearms assigned at birth, which are still in their intimate bodily-integrated possession! WHY, Santa, WHY does ANY Government Almighty frickin' FREAK want to make us register our forearms?!?!?

    (Next thing ya know, they'll be forcibly amputating our forearms!!!)

  2. SQRLSY   2 months ago

    How many guns are stolen? Are we gonna require gun thieves to register these transactions? How many guns change hands by being lost and found by someone else, traded or sold privately, etc. All of this record-keeping is a waste of time, unless gun-grabbing from the law-abiding folks is the goal. Ass has been said for eons now...

    "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."

    1. ricbee   2 months ago

      The BiDung conspiracy deepens
      these records must be destroyed

    2. B G   1 month ago

      The left would probably insist on mandatory background checks on anyone planning to steal a gun, or maybe formal licensing for all firearm thieves and fences, and think that such a law might change something.

      After that, they'll prosecute street dealers selling fentanyl mixed with or in place of other street drugs for violations of "truth in labelling" laws.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Found the problem:

    …enabled by Biden-era policy changes….

    1. Murray Rothtard   2 months ago

      He was certainly a big piece of shit

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Isn't odd how these agencies act immediately when democrats tell them to be tyrannical (ATF database, J6 mass arrests, Covid lockdowns, etc.), but ignore, with impunity, GOPe reequests to stop?

      1. Heresolong   2 months ago

        The worker bees don't change. I'd imagine that most of them are either indifferent to the issue or supportive of keeping records, since that's a key function of bureaucrats. "Hey, digitize these records". "OK". "Hey, destroy all the work you did last year" "WTF?"

        1. ricbee   2 months ago

          We got a lot more swamp to drain

    3. jimc5499   2 months ago

      Actually he was just continuing what Obama started.

    4. freedomwriter   2 months ago

      It is hilarious when you like and believe Reason. Bias confirmation much? If it had said "Trump era policy changes" you would be crying about TDS and how awful Reason is
      Only a dumbass would think they haven't had a firearm list for decades. All this registry and background bullshit is for one reason: to keep track.

  4. SRG2   2 months ago

    So there is no registry, only the information necessary to create one.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      A searchable database of firearm and owner isn't a registry?

      Fuck off slaver.

  5. JFree   2 months ago

    Now, members of Congress want answers from the federal gun cops about a vast gun registry database that could threaten the liberty and privacy of firearms owners.

    First there were questions about whether Congress has authority re starting wars. But Congress could not find its nutsack.
    Then there were questions about whether Congress has taxing authority. But Congress could not find its nutsack.
    Finally there were questions about whether the exec branch has created a firearms database and executes firearms owners on the streets. And Congress realized it has no nutsack.

    1. GroundTruth   2 months ago

      On this we agree!

  6. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    Would everyone in the US who wants to live in a world without guns please move to China, Eritrea, Singapore, Cambodia, or North Korea?

    Thank you for your attention to this matter.

    1. Eeyore   2 months ago

      I think Cuba is a good option and the flight isn't as far.

      My favorite destination for them is space. If I calculate it correctly the space x super heavy should be able to put roughly 2000 people into a stable, but fatal orbit.

      1. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

        Cuba is where Spain invented concentration camps. Yanks are puzzled by reconcentrados and by frijoles refritos. But neither means twice. You can look it up.

  7. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    And nothing happened....

    1. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      You would think if the republicans "controlled" the house, senate and white house that whoever set up this illegal database would just be arrested and tried.

      1. Heresolong   2 months ago

        I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the courts would determine that keeping records didn't constitute creating a database. I don't like it either, but that's how I suspect it would end. What probably needs to happen is that Congress needs to pass a new law saying that no records of firearms purchases will be kept longer than xx years, rather than there being an administrative rule saying that. Then someone could be prosecuted if it came to it.

      2. ricbee   2 months ago

        The swamp is deep

  8. python33   2 months ago

    We all know it's coming and sure Trump is far from perfect, but Kamala would have moved this along and everyone but the sheep will admit it.

  9. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    What's that country song?
    A little less talk and a lot more action?

    Quit sending letters.
    Pass a law requiring the elimination of the data base and all backups.

    Then pass the damn budget for the first time in decades, and then outlaw any other method of funding the feds. No more continuing resolutions, no more emergency funding, no more stop gap spending, no more nothing but regular order budgets.

  10. James K. Polk   2 months ago

    There's nothing wrong with a forearms registry. The AMA has one, why can't the feds have one too?

    1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

      They fixed their typo by now... See my earlier cumment, the very first one way up top... Shit's a gut-buster! (In my own humble opiates, shit is.)

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Due to length and girth restrictions, the AMA put me on their destructive device registry three times.

  11. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    What is obstructed in the report is that this digitization was happening during the entirety of Trump 1.0. Rs cry about the government creating a list to take your guns, and then the Rs create/help create that very list. It is unclear when this started.

    1. freedomwriter   2 months ago

      During Trump's first presidency, the ATF was found to have processed and digitized over 50 million "out of business" records of gun dealers in FY 2021, later confirming a database of 920 million records, though denying it constituted a gun registry.

    2. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

      See the ngram instructions below. Remember when we had no DHS? no Transport Sozialist Arbeiterpartei? No ICE? Who is inventing and arming National Socialist Stormtroopers?

  12. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    Wait, why isn't this all trump's fault?

    1. freedomwriter   2 months ago

      TDS.

      1. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

        Trumpanzee Demented Socialist

  13. MollyGodiva   2 months ago

    ATF needs to go away. We don't need a deducted law enforcement agency for products that are legal.

  14. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

    "The ATF Created a Backdoor Gun Registry. Lawmakers Want an Explanation."

    Still waiting for a reasonable explanation why the US has an ATF in the first place.

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      In the first place, I think it was about collecting taxes.

    2. virex   2 months ago

      Sounds like backdoor machine guns are legal then.

      1. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

        When I was a kid, backdoor shotguns were legal as sea salt in places like Plano--provided all they killed were burglars.

  15. Mike Litoris   2 months ago

    Whoever did this at ATF should have their nuts removed with a rusty soup can lid!

  16. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

    It takes a special kind of innocence to believe a shrewdness of looter politicians is going to suddenly cherrypick things to be truthful about. I voted against the entire lot of them and pity the wretch that doesn't vote the freest platform.

  17. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

    Notice how Reason points a lot to falling crime rates? Go to a Google ngram generator page
    https://books.google.com/ngrams/
    Set the date for 1950 or 1960 and plug in police violence. Note the surge in news of that while "we" invaded 'Nam? Now look at right after the G Waffen Bush asset-forfeiture Crash of 2008 and tell the reporters what you see. Does that curve fit the official narrative?

  18. BSalz3586   2 months ago

    Trump is the most anti-gun President in American history.

    1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

      But Sevo and the other fake libertarians still adore him. Worship him, actually. Sad!

    2. Brett Bellmore   1 month ago

      Except for all the prior ones in my lifetime, sure.

  19. Livemike   1 month ago

    "The ATF Created a Backdoor Gun Registry. Lawmakers Want an Explanation."
    Bureaucrats do whatever the fuck they want and never suffer consequences for it. DId legislators not know that?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Florida Cop Punished With 'Training/Counseling' for Farting in Colleague's Face

C.J. Ciaramella | 4.2.2026 10:38 AM

Gorsuch, Barrett, and Roberts Raise Fatal Objections to Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

Damon Root | 4.2.2026 9:47 AM

War and/or Peace

Eric Boehm | 4.2.2026 9:30 AM

On 'Liberation Day,' Trump Promised a Manufacturing Boom. The Data Tell a Different Story.

Jack Nicastro | 4.2.2026 7:30 AM

A Year After 'Liberation Day,' Trump's Tariffs Will Never Be Legitimate Without a Vote in Congress

Eric Boehm | 4.2.2026 6:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks