The ATF Created a Backdoor Gun Registry. Lawmakers Want an Explanation.
Federal law bans creation of a gun registry, but regulators made one anyway.
It has been illegal since 1986 for the federal government to establish a national firearms registry. As you might expect of the sort of people who gravitate to government employment, the bureaucrats at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), enabled by Biden-era policy changes, have taken that as a challenge. Now, members of Congress want answers from the federal gun cops about a vast gun registry database that could threaten the liberty and privacy of firearms owners. They have been stonewalled so far.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Lawmakers Question an Illegal Gun Registry
On February 3, Rep. Michael Cloud (R–Texas) and 26 other members of Congress wrote to the ATF asking about the status of a year-old query that the regulatory agency has ignored. The original 2025 letter inquired about the ATF's collection of Form 4473 firearms transaction records, which are filled out in the course of every firearms sale by a licensed dealer, from gun vendors that have gone out of business. These records have accumulated and turned into a gun registry in waiting.
"We fear that ATF could have as many as 1.1-billion-gun registration records in its database, if ATF has continued with this historic pace and digitalized an average of 50 million firearm transaction records per year," the members of Congress reminded the ATF in the recent letter. "This is a violation of the federal prohibition on gun registration at 18 U.S.C. 926(a)(3)."
The source of concern for the 27 members of Congress is not only the de facto registry—though that's disturbing enough—but that it has seemingly been created in defiance of a specific prohibition. Under the Firearms Owners' Protection Act, which became law in 1986, "no such rule or regulation prescribed after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act may require that…any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or dispositions be established."
However, that law also contained the seeds of mischief by requiring gun dealers to maintain sales records that, if they go out of business, must be surrendered to the government. For decades, dealers could purge older records, surrendering only more recent ones to the ATF if they closed their doors. That changed under the Biden administration.
ATF Builds on a Biden-Era Policy Change
"In 2022, the ATF finalized a rule requiring FFLs to maintain firearm transaction records indefinitely instead of destroying them after 20 years," Del Schlangen wrote in 2024 for the University of Wyoming College of Law's Firearms Research Center. "This move, along with the ATF's 'zero-tolerance' guidance for revoking FFL licenses, has further fueled concerns about the potential for a federal gun registry."
Schlangen also noted that instead of the masses of paper retained in the past, the ATF was now converting firearm transaction records to electronic format, and "as of 2021, the ATF had digitized over 50 million out-of-business records in that year alone."
That figure wasn't advertised by the Biden administration. Instead, the Gun Owners of America (GOA) gained access to internal ATF documents revealing that in 2021, the regulatory agency processed 54.7 million out-of-business records—mostly paper, but some submitted in increasingly common digital format. Those records quickly added up.
In response to a 2021 query from Cloud, who has turned the backdoor gun registry into a crusade, the gun bureaucrats conceded that "ATF manages 920,664,765 OBR [out of business records] as of November 2021. This includes digital and an estimated number of hard copy records that are awaiting image conversion. It is currently estimated that 865,787,086 of those records are in digitalized format."
But the Registry Isn't Searchable! Sort of.
A May 2022 report from GOA based on freedom of information requests revealed that the ATF stored these records in searchable PDF and JPEG formats. The agency claims it's in compliance with the law banning gun registries, though, because the resulting database isn't searchable by name. But that's apparently a choice that can be altered at any time.
"It appears the only reason ATF's registry is not searchable by name is because ATF has merely disabled the ability for its software to search that particular record field," notes the GOA report. "Of course, something that is so easily disabled could be easily re-enabled."
Besides, the report adds, "ATF records reveal its gun registry to be searchable by weapon type, make, model, serial number, and caliber, among other functions."
In fact, proponents of a gun registry used the searchability of the Out of Business Records Imaging System (OBRIS) as a selling point after the attempted assassination of then-presidential candidate Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania. After the would-be assassin was killed, law enforcement agents seized his rifle with hopes of retrieving details based on the serial number.
"They were able to do so in about 30 minutes," Perry Stein reported for The Washington Post. "The search used sale records from an out-of-business gun store that the government is required to collect—but that Republican lawmakers and the gun lobby would like to place off-limits."
Well, yes. Advocates of self-defense and of gun ownership in general oppose a gun registry because they fear it could lead to gun confiscation, as politicians including former Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris keep threatening. That's why they successfully pushed to make a registry illegal. And a searchable database of gun sales that has had the search function for names temporarily disabled is a gun registry waiting to be activated. The fact that it has been built at all shows a bureaucracy champing at the bit to escape restrictions on its power.
As Rep. Cloud commented last week, "the American people have a right to know if their government is maintaining an unlawful registry of firearms and firearm owners in direct violation of U.S. code and the Second Amendment."
Government Incompetence Is the Only Saving Grace
The only saving grace is that if the federal government ever flips the switch on that gun database, it's going to be a mess. Records that are 10, 20, or 30 years out of date will have been superseded by the passage of time. Gun owners will have moved, divorced and divided their property, died and left their possessions to their heirs, lost guns, or transferred them in private transactions. Or they'll just claim that their guns are long gone in tragic boating accidents.
But when has the federal government ever done anything especially well? Incompetence has never prevented government officials from taking on big projects like gun registries, and from damaging liberty as they do so.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Start of article says...
"It has been illegal since 1986 for the federal government to establish a national forearms registry."
Everyone except amputees and assorted cripples has snot just one, butt TWO, forearms assigned at birth, which are still in their intimate bodily-integrated possession! WHY, Santa, WHY does ANY Government Almighty frickin' FREAK want to make us register our forearms?!?!?
(Next thing ya know, they'll be forcibly amputating our forearms!!!)
How many guns are stolen? Are we gonna require gun thieves to register these transactions? How many guns change hands by being lost and found by someone else, traded or sold privately, etc. All of this record-keeping is a waste of time, unless gun-grabbing from the law-abiding folks is the goal. Ass has been said for eons now...
"When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns."
Found the problem:
…enabled by Biden-era policy changes….
He was certainly a big piece of shit
Isn't odd how these agencies act immediately when democrats tell them to be tyrannical (ATF database, J6 mass arrests, Covid lockdowns, etc.), but ignore, with impunity, GOPe reequests to stop?
So there is no registry, only the information necessary to create one.
A searchable database of firearm and owner isn't a registry?
Fuck off slaver.
Now, members of Congress want answers from the federal gun cops about a vast gun registry database that could threaten the liberty and privacy of firearms owners.
First there were questions about whether Congress has authority re starting wars. But Congress could not find its nutsack.
Then there were questions about whether Congress has taxing authority. But Congress could not find its nutsack.
Finally there were questions about whether the exec branch has created a firearms database and executes firearms owners on the streets. And Congress realized it has no nutsack.
Would everyone in the US who wants to live in a world without guns please move to China, Eritrea, Singapore, Cambodia, or North Korea?
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
And nothing happened....