The Second Shooting
Plus: Kristi Noem's transformation of DHS, Stanley Kubrick's Gigolo Joe, and more...
A second shooting in Minneapolis: A U.S. citizen—a 37-year-old ICU nurse named Alex Pretti—was shot and killed by immigration agents in Minneapolis over the weekend.
Pretti's death has become a lightning rod for criticism of the excesses of the Trump administration. Pretti, whom federal government officials have tarred as a "would-be assassin" committing "domestic terrorism", was carrying a firearm (with a permit) at the time he was shot. He had no criminal record.
As "law enforcement officers were conducting a targeted operation in Minneapolis against an illegal alien wanted for violent assault, an individual approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9 mm semi-automatic handgun," the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) claimed in an official statement. "The officers attempted to disarm the suspect but the armed suspect violently resisted….Fearing for his life and the lives and safety of fellow officers, an agent fired defensive shots….The suspect also had 2 magazines and no ID—this looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement."
But Pretti never drew his weapon (even though the Department of Homeland Security's Kristi Noem says he was "brandishing" it). He appears to have been disarmed before he was shot. Simply carrying a firearm, plus two magazines, should not be regarded as an invitation to be killed in a country that deigns to protect Second Amendment rights. But shot he was.
It is possible that his gun accidentally discharged—it was a Sig Sauer P320, which has a history of doing that—but there's not much to suggest that happened. The video does not appear to indicate that, and it seems unlikely we'll get a full, reliable investigation. "Video footage of Pretti's death shows federal agents using pepper spray on protesters," writes Reason's Robby Soave. "Pretti appears to be recording the altercation with his cell phone. After an agent shoves one of the protesters to the ground, Pretti moves to assist her. Several CBP agents then decide to bring Pretti down. It's conceivable that the agent who shot Pretti had the impression that he was reaching for his weapon—though the first shot clearly went off after another agent disarmed the protester."
The administration has chosen a line and stuck with it. Pretti, in their telling, was a dangerous "assassin" trying to pick off law enforcement. Video of his encounter with immigration agents does not support this portrayal. As Reason's Jacob Sullum points out, "DHS again promises a thorough investigation of a fatal shooting after prejudging the outcome."
An assassin tried to murder federal agents and this is your response. https://t.co/4Gx5UPpc4X
— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) January 24, 2026
Interestingly, Trump—possibly attuned to quickly-tanking public opinion—seems like he might be willing to pull back from Minnesota. "I don't like any shooting. I don't like it," Trump told The Wall Street Journal. "But I don't like it when somebody goes into a protest and he's got a very powerful, fully loaded gun with two magazines loaded up with bullets also. That doesn't play good either."
"At some point we will leave," he added. "We've done, they've done a phenomenal job." He added that the officers' actions were under review.
The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy: How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?
It's not worth a single needless death like this to remove 1000 or even 10,000 illegal immigrants. https://t.co/xGt2nyOuLY
— Thomas Chatterton Williams (@thomaschattwill) January 25, 2026
And another question is raised by the reckless brutality on full display now. Are agencies like ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) doing what they claim? Are you safer now? Is your money well-spent? Is the government doing what it ought to be?
It seems like the thing that everyone is missing is that mass deportations are not happening. Nothing close.
— Dave Smith (@ComicDaveSmith) January 25, 2026
And, relevant to libertarians in particular: Are gun owners safe in Trump's America?
As rumors circulated that the administration would target Maine's Somali population, "I stopped carrying the 9-mm compact handgun—a Glock 19 equipped with a Holosun red dot—that I keep underneath my shirt most days, in full compliance with Maine's concealed-carry laws," writes Tyler Austin Harper in The Atlantic. "Although it is completely within my rights to carry concealed in my state…the past few weeks have made it apparent that ICE and Border Patrol don't put much store in the law or Constitution." What do we have left when our right to keep and bear arms is winnowed down to something unrecognizable, when our right to film agents of the state is conflated with domestic terrorism?
Scenes from New York: New series on "affording New York" featuring a family of five—the father is a super—who lives on $140,000 dollars a year in Manhattan's Morningside Heights. I am reminded, as I read this, that most of the so-called affordability crisis (housing perhaps exempted) is actually a crisis of budgeting and priorities; when you are legitimately middle-class, yet want to live in one of the priciest cities in the country, you must make tradeoffs that will sometimes feel painful, and you must continuously assess whether you still find those tradeoffs to be worthwhile. People have been doing this for centuries, yet there's a certain breed of champagne socialist that seems to believe that they shouldn't have to, that the state should smooth their way.
QUICK HITS
- "In the year since Noem left her post as South Dakota's governor to lead the Department of Homeland Security, the agency has dramatically transformed in ways that are increasingly visible to the American public," reports The Washington Post. "Homeland Security's sprawling deportation campaign is a marked departure from the agency's focus after its founding in the aftermath of Sept. 11. The department was created to protect the nation against foreign terrorists and work closely with federal and local agencies. Under Noem's leadership, the agency has moved its focus to immigration enforcement—pulling and cutting resources from other operations, like the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to carry out the president's mass deportation campaign."
- "China's top general, second only to Xi Jinping, the nation's leader, in the military command, has been put under investigation and accused of 'grave violations of discipline and the law,' the Ministry of National Defense said on Saturday, the most stunning escalation yet in Mr. Xi's purge of the People's Liberation Army elite," reports The New York Times. "The general, Zhang Youxia, is a vice chairman of the Central Military Commission, the Communist Party body that controls China's armed forces. Another member of the commission, Gen. Liu Zhenli, who leads the military's Joint Staff Department, is also under investigation, the Defense Ministry said. Its announcement did not say what either general was alleged to have done wrong." This is all part of Xi's intense escalation toward ensuring all top military officials are loyal to him and him alone.
- "It was the summer of 1990 in Stanley Kubrick's kitchen and I'd just invented the sex robot Gigolo Joe," writes Ian Watson for Bloomberg.
- How to understand Pope Leo and the Augustinian tradition.
- Interesting:
???????????????? Geert Wilders, a major Trump ally, lost half his seats in the last election. This week his party lost another 7 MPs. They walked! Collapse in real time pic.twitter.com/7qyWdWNrUX
— Mariska den Eelden ???????????????? (@eeldenden) January 25, 2026
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
A U.S. citizen—a 37-year-old ICU nurse named Alex Pretti—was shot and killed by immigration agents in Minneapolis over the weekend.
For those 2A enthusiasts among us, this one looks a little dodgy.
Simply carrying a firearm, plus two magazines, should not be regarded as an invitation to be killed in a country that deigns to protect Second Amendment rights.
Absolutely correct, but I will temper that a tad by saying responsible concealed carriers don't put themselves into this position, which it appears to me he did.
For some of us, concealed carry of our range gun to a police action or civil unrest without our FOID, CCW permit would rightly be regarded as premeditation even if we had chose to defend ourselves.
The rest of us, of course, live in free states that don't require 'cards' at all;)
Only the government has agency in Reeeason town.
This is where the majority of us will be. Although I enjoy the right to carry when out and about, I'm not putting myself in contact with law enforcement anywhere that I do. Whether within my rights or not, I'm not betting my life on that cop not harming me.
He was not legally carrying because he did not have his permit with him, which is a condition of the permit.
Disclaimer: no one should need a permit for any right (supposedly) guaranteed by the US Constitution)
Not the slightest bit dodgy. He armed himself in preparation for interfering with cops at a violent anti-cop protest and chose to resist arrest. The outcome was predictable.
It's dodgy because it appears he may have been disarmed before he was shot.
He still put himself in that position AND fought with federal officers while armed.
the further question is did the officer know teh gun had been removed. it seems the officer who got the gun didn't announce that he had control. thus a team failure of communication. was he shot needlessly yes but at teh same time he would be alive if he had not interfered which he did he got between the officer and the other person. Is ice guilty of murder I'd say no traggic death yes.
And yes it is legal to carry a fire arm during a protest except in California which in my opinion is an infringement of a right.
Based on the videos I've seen, it doesn't appear that the other officers knew that the gun was removed. It looks like they were each and all very surprised by the initial gunshot, which happened while other officers were yelling 'Gun! Gun!'
They also wouldn't have known whether or not he only had one.
That, and the whistles being blown all over made it difficult to hear if the gun had been removed or not. I’d imagine that all the noise made it difficult to hear anything and added to the confusion in the incident. From my perspective, listening intently to the videos, it’s hard to make out what exactly was said over the whistle blowing. I did hear something about a gun followed by ten gunshots.
The whistles and shouting are loud. Pretti never goes to the ground and the officer that shoots first can't see his hands.
Pretti should have gone flat. If I had to guess, the dipshit was trying to protect his phone which is why he didn't immediately sprawl out.
At this point, to me it looks like a tragic and avoidable death, but also a logical outcome of deliberately creating a chaotic situation by encouraging increasingly violent and obstructive behavior of protesters while simultaneously isolating federal law enforcement from any local support operations creating a 'siege' mindset. It's almost like somebody (or groups of somebodies) wanted this to happen. (end sarcasm)
Seeing the footage from the last couple weeks, it also has me questioning all other 'government massacre of protestors' narratives I grew up with. For all I know, the Boston Massacre was a similar setup to throw an angry mob at stressed out soldiers with the hope of sparking a revolution.
tl;dr - the folks that want chaos have now gotten exactly what they want. We are past bleeding Kansas and into the firing on Fort Sumter. Next couple years will be insane.
Resisting arrest is punishable by summary execution?
Fighting police while armed is extremely stupid. Even you should be able to understand that.
This x100. If I get pulled over at any time and I have a gun in my console, my ID and insurance card are on the dash when the cop gets to me and my hands are on the wheel. I'm giving that cop zero reason to worry about me because I don't trust any of them with my life.
"Fighting police while armed is extremely stupid. Even you should be able to understand that."
Don't overestimate Tony.
No, he can’t.
Tell us about Babbit again Molly. She wasn't even armed.
Babbitt was a traitor who was about to attack Congresscritters. Had she not been shot J6 would have turned out much worse. An angry mob is far more dangerous then someone with a gun.
Thanks again!
The lefts true views ^^
"My insurgency is speech, your speech is treason!"
The asswipe's true views ^^
Fixed.
(not you, E-b H S)
Sullum +5
That’s harsh.
Walz +11. You keep burning out my Walz Retardometers.
Stupid cunt. You, not Ashli.
Hey now, Molly isn’t a stupid cunt.
She’s a fully retarded cunt.
"Babbitt was a traitor who was about to attack Congresscritters."
There were exactly 0 Congresspeople anywhere near the confrontation. It was an execution, but you're OK with it.
In your case, I'm leaning toward skipping the resisting part.
What about attempting to go through a door, unarmed, at the capitol? That's a headshot, right, Tony?
Liz also left out (what happened to boaf sidez!) that Pretti was likely a memeber of ICE Watch, same as Good. And that this ICE Watch group was organized on signal by Democrat Minneapolis government employees.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/left-wing-activists-run-quasi-police-operation-signal-target-ice-agents-minneapolis
This is what shocks me the most about reason. They pushed the j6 insurrection narrative. They ignored the babbit narrative. They applauded Tarrio, who wasn't even there, getting 20 years. A 3 hour riot.
Yet they continue to defend leftist riots while at the same time blaming trump for the violence. They ignore this violence being funded by foreign Marxist groups. They ignore democrats working directly with the groups.
Why?
Further, they pushed the BLM riots as 'mostly peaceful', the lying sacks of lefty shit.
As I said in another post...they should just rename themselves "Alternet" and be done with the scam.
We do not know this. He may have been out for a coffee and came upon this scene. He was simply directing a little traffic and filming. Pretty innocuous stuff. The officers escalated this situation big time. Ammateurs. Should all be fired. Maybe they can be mall cops.
Dont fight with cops when armed. They even taught us this in our concealed carry class.
Dont just ignore what pretti did. He violated basics of gun safety training.
Honest question: Was he physically fighting with the cops? I saw a video claiming to be him trying to block the path of a (I guess) federal LEO vehicle, but I couldn't tell if it was him. I haven't seen other video beyond the actual shooting itself.
Him being shot after being disarmed looks like a fuckup, but if he was actively interfering then he's not the innocent victim we're trying to make him out to be. If he was fighting with ICE then he was part of what made the scene chaotic, which is what led to the fuckup.
Yes. He was physically resisting them. When they went to detain and disarm him after he put himself between them and someone they were attempting to detain he started fighting with them.
He wasn't a passive observer.
Video is in one of the weekend threads.
He tried to help a protester the police had knocked down -- he interfered. When the police naturally knocked him down too, he fought back.
One of the things "professional" non-violent agitators did back in the civil rights protest days was teach protesters to not resist. I read of training classes where they pushed students around, knocked them down, all to get them to learn to accept the violence instead of following their instinct to resist, even if not actually fighting back. It took some guts to go into a protest like that and not fight back, to make the cops be the ones who started the violence.
Pretti was not one of those. He resisted and fought back and gave them the excuse they needed to get beatier. However wrong they were to shoot him, it is stupid to expect anything else when it turned out the violent protester who had been fighting them was armed. These are not situations which have hours or even minutes to understand. When violent protesters are attacking cops, throwing bricks and bottles, the cops are going to be on edge, and then it turns out one of them was stupid enough to fight cops while armed?
Stupid, just plain stupid.
He tried to help a protester the police had knocked down -- he interfered. When the police naturally knocked him down too, he fought back.
That is not the correct order of events. Stop lying.
The cop in the beige hat first shoved one protester, then shoved Pretti, then shoved the protester with the orange backpack. That protester fell to the ground. Pretti tried to help her get back on her feet, and that is when the ICE agent dragged Pretti away from her.
His "resistance" was trying to not get beaten to death as he was gang tackled by a bunch of officers.
ChatGPT, what is Jeff is doing here?
1) Narrative reordering
He asserts a specific sequence of events (“that is not the correct order”) to reframe causality, shifting blame away from Pretti and onto the officers.
2) Moral reframing of “resistance”
Jeff recasts resistance as self-defense (“trying to not get beaten to death”), redefining the same actions to neutralize culpability.
3) Absolutist language to foreclose debate
Phrases like “Stop lying” and “gang tackled” shut down uncertainty and signal that alternative interpretations are illegitimate.
4) Victim amplification
He escalates stakes with emotive phrasing (“beaten to death”) to heighten sympathy and justify the reframed account.
5) Selective emphasis
He highlights officer shoves and minimizes context about interference while armed, narrowing focus to details that support his conclusion.
ML, do you think trying to cover your face so as not to get beaten constitutes "violent resistance"?
And you dare claim other people sealion?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/videos-of-alex-pretti-shooting-by-federal-agents-in-minneapolis-contradict-trump-official-claims/ar-AA1UWCIW
The woman in pink video I think shows the most. And it is getting harder to find.
I would describe Pretti's actions as failing to follow lawful order, to get out of the street, the resisting arrest. I wouldn't say he attacked ICE.
Had he stayed on the sidewalk and let ICE do their legally mandated (by multiple congresses and presidents) job he would be alive. ICE was wrong to shoot him, but his actions sealed his fate. But this what the marxists want to distract from the fraud and naked power grab with illegals in blue districts. This guy, like Good, was a brainwashed useful idiot. He was out there fighting the gestapo, and was surprised when the gestapo shot him after seeing his firearm.
This is how I see the events as well.
If Pretti was a MAGA member, the left would be saying he deserved what he got. They sure as hell wouldn't be defending the 2A.
I haven't seen anything that justifies the shooting. At the same time, he put himself in the situation and forced their hand, even if they were criminal in doing it. I've always respected law enforcement's ability to fuck me up whether legal or justified. You fight cops in court not in the street.
I haven't seen anything that justifies the shooting.
This is where I find myself as well. I also didn't see a reason to kneel on GF for ten minutes either.
That said, both (and include Goode) played very stupid games and won the ultimate prize.
If that is what you truly believe, then what is stopping you from calling it a murder, and criticizing the ICE officers who murdered him?
Floyd didn't die from being kneeled on. Junkie OD'd. Still didn't need to be kneeled on for 10 minutes. Doesn't make it murder.
Pretti was killed interfering with police. Not murder but not justified IMO.
Goode was killed in self-defense.
Easy, it was a Marxists, therefore not a human.
It is not dodgy at all. Carrying a weapon means assuming great responsibility. One of those responsibilities is not to get into a fight with the cops. If you are carrying a weapon and get into with the cops, you can't complain if they shoot you. What are they supposed to do, hope that the person who is attacking them doesn't shoot them? Play by the Marquise of Queensbury rules? This wasn't an unlawful shoot. This was a Darwin Award.
One of those responsibilities is not to get into a fight with the cops.
Pretti didn't pick a fight with the cops. The cop first assaulted him.
Hey, Fatfuck, why don’t you try doing the same as Pretti did for the sake of scientific experiment? Put your fifty cents where your mouth is and go up there. I triple dog dare you.
Well said child. Want to sign up for a poster we are making? It will be called "Facsist".
What is Jeff is doing here?
1) Redefining initiation
He reframes the entire incident around who “started it,” asserting officer initiation to negate claims about responsibility while armed.
2) Binary moral framing
By declaring “the cop first assaulted him,” Jeff collapses a complex, fast-moving encounter into a single moral switch: innocent victim vs. culpable aggressor.
3) Evasion of the core risk argument
He sidesteps the broader point about heightened responsibility when armed and instead litigates first contact, avoiding the safety rationale entirely.
4) Absolutist assertion
The statement is presented as settled fact, not interpretation, foreclosing nuance or uncertainty about contested video and testimony.
5) Outcome laundering
By focusing on initiation, he implicitly absolves downstream decisions and consequences, regardless of escalation dynamics once a weapon is involved.
Oh good, here comes ML to post more ChatGPT nonsense in order to avoid substantive discussion.
Tell us ML, do you think Pretti picked a fight with the cops?
I think ML's ChatGPT responses to you get under your skin so much because they completely expose your tactics.
I love the spin.
We already know from his online profiles that he was a radical left wing trans activist. He was active amongst a group planning to intentionally interfere with law enforcement operations.
Whether or not the order of events that lead up to his death justify him being shot, he's not some innocent bystander.
His state of mind is not relevent to his actions - Sullum
Yeah this. He was reportedly a card carrying member of ICE Watch. This group is not in the business of organizing peaceful protests. They specifically track agents involved in targeted arrests, in this case an illegal alien convicted of assault already a situation fraught with risk. As a "legal observer" he could have easily filmed the operation from 30 feet away, posted it online, and got a million clicks. Instead he chose to become directly involved in obstructing the operation. Incredibly he did not even bother to have his CC credentials with him. I carry my FOID every time I leave the house along with my driver's license. None of this is to say he deserved to be killed. It looks to me like an overreaction by a cop and a confluence of predictable events. Both sides are cranking out propaganda and neither can be trusted. But the big winners here are the ICE Watch agitators. This is the George Floyd moment they've been hoping for.
He wasn't carrying any cards - - - - - -
Good lord, out of the mouths of pedophiles and straight to your post. Do you wear knee pads at your ICE interview?
No whatever is happening in Minnesota “looks a little dodgy.” It is not a spontaneous public protest, it is more akin to an organized resistance/insurgency operation.
https://x.com/Schwalm5132/status/2015470661490057540
When it's financed and the rioters are bussed from place to place, the backers are engaged in insurgency if anyone else is.
Remember how Trump got dragged for saying "Go home in love and peace" before what was a pretty minor riot?
And yet the Democrats are actively calling for violence here and nothing happens. The Republicans are ball-less clowns.
Imagine if Trump had told J6ers to obstruct the Hill Police? What would have happened to him them?
I often suspect that hypocrisy is the end unto itself, rather than the means for Democrats. It's what the Soviets used to do as a power move to demonstrate that they can do everything and you can do nothing.
And yet the Democrats are actively calling for violence here and nothing happens.
Which elected Democrat has "actively called for violence"?
Walz. Frey. Flanagan. Every single Congressional Democrat.
Is that so. Can you cite a quotation of them where you think they are "actively calling for violence"?
Like this, Jeffy?
https://x.com/gragedustin/status/1994814588127515106?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Or this, with video of Walz?
https://x.com/nicksortor/status/2011612654125858855?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Or Frey here? Again with video of Frey.
https://x.com/mjtruthultra/status/2011802180710289546?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Calling someone a Nazi is not "actively calling for violence".
In that video, Walz is literally asking people to record ICE activity on their phones. This is completely legal and not "actively calling for violence".
In the video with Frey, he said that RESIDENTS are demanding that the local police fight ICE agents, but then later on in that same video, Frey says that we can't let that happen. Again not "actively calling for violence".
None of your examples involve elected Democrats "actively calling for violence". Because they haven't.
By and large, elected Democrats are center-left establishmentarians. They are not pushing violence in the streets.
There ARE some radicals pushing violence in the streets, but they are not elected Democrats.
What is Jeff is doing here?
1) Narrowing the definition to escape the charge
He sharply constrains “actively calling for violence” to explicit, literal exhortations, excluding rhetoric, signaling, or encouragement that could plausibly escalate conflict.
2) Quote-lawyering
Jeff parses statements line-by-line to show they don’t meet his narrow standard, treating context, tone, and foreseeable effects as irrelevant.
3) Burden-shifting
He demands exact quotations as proof, then dismisses provided clips by redefining what counts as proof—raising the evidentiary bar mid-argument.
4) Reframing to procedural legality
By emphasizing that actions like filming are “legal,” he sidesteps the concern about rhetorical incitement versus legality.
5) Containment move
He isolates “radicals” from “elected Democrats” to firewall the party from responsibility, even when critics argue leaders’ rhetoric enables street-level escalation.
Bottom line
Jeff avoids the broader question of whether elite rhetoric predictably fuels violence—even if it stops short of explicit commands.
How about actively leading a Signal chat? Like this dipshit legislator?
https://x.com/erikac47/status/2015831626526105915?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Or are you going to move the goalposts yet again?
Oh, here’s another one, Jeffy, this time it’s the Lieutenant Governor who is also apparently on the Signal chats coordinating with Antifa. It even has video of her talking.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2015504528796209275?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
I also have little doubt anymore that she’s neck deep in the “resistance”.
With video of her.
https://x.com/0hour1/status/2015823628240040388?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Here you go you weaselly fuck. And before you try to make a million excuses that it could be a misinterpretation of their words and explain them all away, remember what you considered was a call to violence by Trump for J6. And don't say you didn't, because I have the links.
Kris Mayes, Arizona Attorney General: Stated under Arizona's "stand your ground" laws, residents could shoot masked ICE agents if they feel threatened, stating, "If someone is coming at you in a mask and you can't identify them, and you feel in danger, then yeah."
Tim Walz: Compared ICE to the "modern-day Gestapo," saying masked agents jumping from unmarked vans represent "authoritarian actions," and noted, "If some guy jumped out of an unmarked car in a van with a mask on tried to grab me... you're gonna push back."
Gavin Newsom: Labeled ICE as "secret police" that are "authoritarian," stating Californians have a "right to push back" against agents "jumping out of unmarked vans attacking people."
Hakeem Jeffries: Urged people to "fight" the Trump administration "in the streets" and declared open season doxxing ICE agents who "will be unsuccessful" in hiding their own identities "no matter what it takes."
Pramila Jayapal: Said stopping immigration enforcement is "inspiring," while accusing ICE agents of being kidnappers."
LaMonica McIver: Incited supporters to "shut down the city" because "we are at war," and was charged with forcibly impeding federal officers during an ICE facility incident.
Norma Torres: During ICE arrests, harassed agents telling the crowd that they need to "get the fuck out of LA."
Bernie Sanders: Urged people to "figure out a way to stop ICE from what they are doing as soon as possible." This implying far more forceful intervention than anything Trump was accused of with J6.
Eric Swalwell: Stated it was a "priority" to dox ICE agents. To target them to make sure they "are no longer faceless," comparing them to "1800s bank robbers or KGB officers."
ad nauseum...
Now, ICE isn't sticking people in ovens, or unlike you Jeff, advocating the policies and ideas of the Third Reich.
They're doing exactly what they did under Reagan, the Bushes, Clinton, and Obama, but somehow now this makes them "Nazis" according to the Democrats.
There's a good reason for this. As the saying goes "They don't kill you because you're a Nazi, they call you a Nazi so they can kill you."
Here's a list of Dems doing just that:
Stephen Lynch: Smeared ICE as "the Gestapo" and "nondescript thugs." in order to justify violence.
Jasmine Crockett: Compared ICE to "slave patrols." Called for racialized resistance.
Rashida Tlaib: Incited action against ICE as it is a "rogue agency" "terrorizing our communities" and "turning our country into a fascist police state."
JB Pritzker: Compared ICE agents doing exactly what they did under Obama, to Nazi's for "grabbing people off the street and disappearing them." Inferred the rioters were like the French resistance.
Brandon Johnson, Chicago Mayor: Labeled ICE as "secret police" "terrorizing our communities." Urged local defiance.
Michelle Wu, Boston Mayor: Compared ICE agents to the neo-Nazi group NSC-131.
Kamala Harris: Said ICE was "in the same category as the KKK."
John Larson: Compared ICE to "the SS and the Gestapo."
Delia Ramirez: Called ICE a "terror force" "intruding into our communities" and "separating our families."
Max Frost: Accused ICE of "the worst horrors and crimes against humanity."
Robin Kelly: Referred to ICE as "Gestapo" and a "betrayal."
Dan Goldman: Called ICE "secret police" who "must be unmasked."
ad nauseum...
It certainly does - and in other circumstances the government wouldn't be able to close ranks as effectively.
But the Left has turned this shooting into a referendum on border control - the lines are drawn and no one can afford to admit a mistake was made.
Reason refuses to ever address the NAP violations of the left and their red guard. This was true during BLM as well. They continue to ignore those violations due to an inherent left leaning anti trump bias.
We have the lefts secret police running down common citizens and demanding their papers.
https://x.com/haileyywest/status/2015090151093837960
We saw the same shit during the BLM riots where they took over entire portions of cities.
We see numerous dem politicians fomenting the unrest and assisting the riots.
https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2026/01/26/link-to-walzs-administration-in-anti-ice-signal-chats-n2198511
Reason ignores it. Why?
We see reason continue to push lies on all these interactions. The latest being an AI image of the headless ICE agent murdering someone.
https://x.com/fred_guttenberg/status/2015521266287935501
These are reasons favored classes having to lie to push their narratives despite reason claiming that narrative as right. Just like all the racist hoaxes they have to create.
Never will reason address the violations of the NAP for their favored groups.
We are literally seeing the lefts return to Maoist behaviors and the recreation of the Red Guard.
Politicians using the masses to raise chaos and fear even against the average citizen.
I find it extremely ironic that reason uses populism as a dirty word but theb at a minimum ignores and condone this creation of the lefts red guard. Did they not teach history to the Reason editors here?
https://redstate.com/streiff/2026/01/25/the-anti-ice-demonstrations-look-more-like-maos-peoples-war-doctrine-than-civil-disturbances-n2198506
The new red guard is now going into hotels in riots as cops stand by.
https://x.com/ScooterCasterNY/status/2015631358664552851
They are destroying cars and property.
https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/2015635815854907595
Then Waltz has the audacity to call in the national guard to feed this violent uprising.
https://x.com/GrageDustin/status/2015530690389917824
Reason, go read a fucking book. Youre literally how Mao took over china. Ignoring the violence of the indoctrinated masses, cowering and fear and defending them even as you claim to not agree with them.
Shrike, sarc, jeff, and others are cheering for this leftist uprising after failing during covid. Dont be like those leftist shits.
Youre literally how Mao took over china.
"Two weeks" ago with "mostly peaceful".
Here is the lone BoP officer who was injured during the violent mob attack on the hotel, hand is dripping blood, asking where the PD was.
https://x.com/ScooterCasterNY/status/2015638140287889450
As we know from above, they work for the politicians supporting the violent left.
"This officer is bleeding."
...
"What is your message to the Mayor, The Protestors?"
No comment.
Standing there bleeding because of a "stochastic civil action" that continues to be ginned up and spread around by members of the press and you ask him for comment?
I can only imagine how Reason would respond to right wing 'protesters' acting this way at a migrant hotel after yet another rape.
I'm tired of this bullshit.
Simply carrying a firearm, plus two magazines, should not be regarded as an invitation to be killed in a country that deigns to protect Second Amendment rights. But shot he was.
He wasn't "simply" carrying a firearm. He intentionally carried a concealed weapon to a violent protest. He intentionally interfered with police dealing with a protester. He intentionally violently resisted arrest.
He may not have intended to shoot cops. But if he was so stupid as to carry a concealed weapon while planning on interfering with and fighting with cops, then he got what he deserved. Sympathy for being stupid, but nothing else.
He intentionally interfered with police dealing with a protester.
The entire situation was initiated when the officer pushed Pretti to the ground.
There is zero evidence that he came there intentionally to start a fight or to shoot anyone.
No. He intentionally interfered with police who were dealing with a protester. Then he intentionally resisted police, which by definition is a violent process. He was not an innocent bystander who had the bad luck of being in the wrong place at the wrong time. He intentionally played stupid games (twice) with stupid people (your choice whether I mean police or protesters or both) at a stupid place (a violent anti-police protest) at a stupid time.
He intentionally interfered with police who were dealing with a protester.
No.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/us/video/minneapolis-ice-shooting-alex-pretti-visual-analysis-digvid
The officer assaulted Pretti. Not the other way around.
Unless you are using the Greg Bovino definition of "interfere", which is apparently, "just showing up".
I’ve an experiment for you, fat stuff. Go to Minneapolis and join an Antifa group. Go with them and follow ICE around. Make sure you carry a pistol with extra magazines. Then get into a scuffle with them. See how fast you last with them and report back to us.
Please God let him do this
None of the coward leftists here will. They will just continue to live and screech in ignorance.
" join an Antifa group"
Not possible, since they don't exist. And even if they did exist, they don't have membership cards.
Yet, they have Signal chat groups.
Not Mastodon?
Nope, not Mastodon. It even had reporters as part of the group.
https://x.com/0hour1/status/2015534687548998058?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
AP video journalist: https://x.com/jpdelco/status/2015538557595607335?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
NPR: https://x.com/anthonyjsisk/status/2015542080232173822?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
The officer assaulted Pretti in response to Pretti interfering with the cops in how they dealt with a protester.
The officer assaulted Pretti in response to Pretti interfering with the cops in how they dealt with a protester.
"how they dealt with a protester" - you mean, shoving to the ground the protester with the orange backpack? So just so we're clear, it is your contention that when Pretti tried to help her get back on her feet, that constituted "interfering" with a legitimate law enforcement purpose?
Why did the officer shove those protesters to the ground in the first place? If he wanted to detain or arrest them all, then there was no need for the shoving.
Maybe, that officer in the beige cap was acting OUTSIDE the realm of legitimate law enforcement tactics, was instead just acting like a common thug at that moment, and therefore doesn't get to claim "obstruction!" when he isn't pursuing a legitimate law enforcement aim.
You make a hell of a next-day armchair quarterback, Jeffy.
Jeffy is a fool, unworthy of the attention.
When a cop shoves you out of the way, the only sane response is to get further away, hopefully exiting the scene before you get arrested. Pretti charged right back into the altercation.
What Jeff is doing here
1) Reframing lawful control as illegitimate force
Jeff recasts standard crowd-control shoving during an active enforcement operation as unjustified “assault,” priming the reader to see police actions as inherently illegitimate.
2) Redefining “interference” to excuse it
He reframes Pretti’s physical involvement as benign “help,” while questioning whether that could ever count as interference, sidestepping the reality that inserting oneself into an arrest scene is routinely treated as obstruction.
3) Motive imputation
By asserting the officer was acting “like a common thug,” Jeff imputes bad faith without evidence, which conveniently nullifies any subsequent claim of lawful authority.
4) Retroactive standard-setting
He judges a fast-moving arrest by an idealized, after-the-fact standard (“no need for shoving”), ignoring how officers establish control in volatile protest environments.
Bottom line
Jeff isn’t analyzing protocol; he’s delegitimizing it. By declaring the initial use of force improper, he makes all downstream enforcement invalid by definition—turning a procedural dispute into a moral one he’s already decided.
Oh, he was just standing around, minding his own business, when suddenly the officer, for no apparent reason, pushed him to the ground?
They will ways lie to themselves to justify their narratives.
I don't mind them lying to themselves, it's when they try to pass off their bullshit as fact to the rest of us, that I get annoyed.
Fair.
Pretty much, yes actually. Watch the video I posted above. Go to the 1:20 mark. You tell me why the officer with the beige cap pushed those three protestors to the ground in the first place.
Why is irrelevant. Pretti still interfered while armed.
The "why" is very much relevant, unless your standard is that cops get to push protesters around for any reason at all.
Well, you say they are allowed to murder for trespassing...
I say that officers are allowed to act in self-defense or in the defense of the lives and property of others, which is what Michael Byrd was doing when he shot Ashli Babbitt.
The officer who shoved the three protesters, then pepper-sprayed Pretti in the face and pulled him into a scuffle, how was that officer acting in self-defense?
Ashly Babbit was unarmed you lying fuck. Byrd was firing blindly and almost hit the officers that were near her.
You just can't stop lying.
Define "protest" in the context of being within arms-length of cops arresting people. Now imagine it is regular street cops arresting someone and Pretti + pals pull the same shit. Getting pushed is the least of their problems.
Define "protest" in the context of being within arms-length of cops arresting people.
You understand that in the present case, the ICE officer *walked to the other side of the street* and initiated the incident by shoving protesters?
The officer lost his cool and picked a fight. When he does that, he loses any benefit of the doubt and should be treated as just another thug.
The officer lost his cool and picked a fight. When he does that, he loses any benefit of the doubt and should be treated as just another thug.
I did not see any evidence of the cop crossing the street to engage the agitators. I will not call them protesters.
If he indeed crossed the street to push the agitators, then my opinion may change.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/us/video/minneapolis-ice-shooting-alex-pretti-visual-analysis-digvid
Go to the 0:39 mark of the video. Note where the officer in the beige cap is, where the two women protesters are (including the one with the orange backpack), and where the white car is. The white car is on the opposite side of the street compared to where the officer is detaining someone.
Then go to the 1:20 mark of the video. The officer walks across the street, to just in front of the white car, where the three protesters have retreated. The officer in the beige cap then shoves the three protesters, including shoving the orange backpack lady to the ground.
There is no logical reason for the officer to have done that. It is because he lost his cool and picked a fight.
Pretti still interfered
Please state precisely the nature of the interference that you are alleging here.
What Jeff is doing here
1) Forcing hyper-specificity to narrow the field
Jeff demands a “precise” definition of interference, shifting the discussion from practical law-enforcement standards (any physical insertion into an arrest scene) to a courtroom-style parsing exercise. This narrows the debate to a level where common-sense definitions can be dismissed as “imprecise.”
2) Creating a moving evidentiary bar
By insisting on exact articulation, he raises the burden of proof in a casual forum while reserving the right to reject any answer that doesn’t meet an artificially high threshold he created. This is less about clarity and more about disqualifying responses.
3) Implicitly redefining the term by omission
He avoids offering his own definition, which lets him reject others’ explanations without committing to a standard of his own. The silence is strategic.
Bottom line
Jeff is not seeking clarification. He’s using procedural pedantry to stall, narrow, and ultimately dispute the ordinary meaning of “interference,” keeping the argument alive without conceding anything.
He may not have intended to shoot cops.
Stochastic martyr. Reason themselves has said this.
Renee Good didn't intend to get shot either. These people are cosplaying.
You don't "simply concealed carry" into a protest in Iran and hope to rally support. You don't "simply concealed carry" onto a battlefield in Ukraine and hope to rally support. You don't "simply concealed carry" to a music festival in Israel and hope to rally support.
They can't gather foreign nationals and set ambushes, which would actually resist tyranny, because then the jig would be up. So this is how they control the narrative, Red Guard-style.
When you live in a police state, the thugs with badges are just as much of a threat as the thugs without badges. The right of self defense applies in both cases.
I have exactly ZERO worries about ICE coming after me with violence. None whatsoever.
Yeah I know. Because you're white. And you apparently don't stand up for the rights of others, only your own.
Fuck you, racist.
Fuck off with the racist shit. We don't worry about ICE because we are not illegals and we don't harass police doing their jobs. Pretti Goode assessment, isn't it?
Yes we know, "you have nothing to hide"
we don't harass police doing their jobs
You give automatic deference to authority. I think that makes you an authoritarian.
I'm Mexican-American on my dad's side. Many of my family are immigrants. Thanks.
Well in that case, you are stupid. ICE is actively racially profiling. You live in St. Louis, right? When they launch their massive operation in St. Louis, then you will find out.
This guy probably didn't think he was in any danger either.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc_d6O2C4pk
That video? The one that shows someone interfering with an ICE officer getting arrested? Not a hint of profiling in that video.
You really are the worst.
There has been a whole lot talk here about how stupid this guy was and how anyone who actually uses their constitutional rights under duress deserves to be killed.
You all have a great point. You are expressing a sad but true version of reality in America right now, and I'll be saying similar things to my children, as these are all great pieces of advice for not getting shot by federal agents.
But that level of awareness of reality and handing out good advice is seperate from if we WANT this to be our reality. It is good that exercising your 2nd amendment rights at a protest will likely get you killed? Is that how we'd like America to work going forward?
It's like if there were a ton of rapists in my neighborhood. I'd certainly tell my daughter not to dress like that, or go out alone at night. But i'd ALSO try to get the rapists out of my neighborhood so that she COULD have the freedom to wear a skirt and have a nightlife safely.
It's smart to prepare accordingly for dangerous realities. It's completely fucking asinine to celebrate and entrench those tragic realities. Let's make America free again.
The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy: How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?
That dipshit governor and moronic mayor are giving Trump supports all the cover they need by egging on the riots. Sacrificing the useful idiots for political purposes is 80% of the problem there.
The fact that this continues to run cover for Tim Walz in his own back yard and, more critically, push a/the narrative for his successor is astounding.
It's not worth a single needless death like this to remove 1000 or even 10,000 illegal immigrants.
Everyone has agency until it's inconvenient to a narrative.
Everyone has agency until it's inconvenient to a narrative.
Media Assistance in Dying.
How many needless deaths should we allow the illegals?
She also leaves out the illegal Pretti was obstructing from justice was wanted for violent assult with intent to kill. But I guess that is different.
the illegal Pretti was obstructing from justice was wanted for violent assult with intent to kill
And that illegal has friends and family. The ICE agents would be foolish not to expect armed resistance and be primed to react to it.
Pretti did not obstruct the officer from detaining the person he was stopping. The officer instead went out of his way to walk to the other side of the street and shove those three protesters to the ground. Why did the officer do that?
OK, then. If anyone might get a booboo then we have to stop enforcing all laws.
WTF?
A deep look into Olhan Omar's husband's businesses finds a lot of know fraud similar to Hunters.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/meet-longtime-biz-partner-ilhan-omars-husband-questions-swirl-skyrocketing-net-worth
What? Is he a genius business consultant and world class painter?
Canada's MAID no longer requires consent and even ignores a woman's declining suicide.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2026/01/too-fast-too-soon-canadas-medically-assisted-suicide-cases-reveal-potential-coercion-rushed-decisions/
If you medically assist someone in dying without consent - how is that differentiated from murder exactly?
It isn't. Ask Kevorkian why he went to prison.
So since this is a very bad news cycle for Team Red, I fully expect the usual suspects around here to try to flood the zone with old stories about idiots on the left behaving badly. Maybe we'll hear about some two-year-old story about a trans activist doing something dumb. Maybe we'll hear about some idiot from Davos saying we should all eat bugs. I don't know. But they are going to try to change the subject as forcefully as they can because they are very obviously in the wrong in trying to defend the murder of Alex Pretti.
Here is an interview on CNN of Greg Bovino by Dana Bash. It is illuminating as to the depths of lies and misinformation that these cretins will sink to.
https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/25/politics/video/bovino-dana-bash-full-interview-digvid
Bash asks Bovino over and over again about the evidence that Pretti was "brandishing" a gun. He refuses to state the plain truth - no, he was not.
Bash asks Bovino over and over again about evidence that Pretti was the one assaulting law enforcement officers. He refuses to state the plain truth that no, Pretti didn't initiate an assault on anyone, it was the ICE agent who assaulted him.
Bash then asks Bovino about any evidence for the claim that Pretti intended to "massacre" law enforcement officers. And here's where it gets really insightful: Bovino's response is, essentially, that his intentions were bad because he decided to show up in the first place and "inject himself" into the situation. Just filming and observing is equivalent to "impeding" and also means that you have bad motives and wish harm on the officers.
The MAGA line on this is pretty clear:
Trust law enforcement implicitly.
Questioning the methods or tactics of law enforcement is a sign of disloyalty and bad motives.
Showing up to observe law enforcement is technically legal, but hey, you're risking death if you do that, because it's completely subjective on the part of the officer when "observing" turns into "impeding", and then the officer gets free license to beat your ass.
Comply or die.
You need to prove your point. Go and get a gun and wave it at federal law enforcement. Use your 2nd Amendment Right. Don't take this lying down Jeff. Go get that AR-15 and defend your nation. Just go out and make your stand!!
I might actually pay to see that.
Got popcorn?
Do you acknowledge that Alex Pretti didn't wave his gun at anyone?
He just assaulted the police. They were supposed to wait and see if anyone got shot before doing anything. Whatever.
He just assaulted the police.
False. The police assaulted him.
Do you acknowledge that Alex Pretti didn't wave his gun at anyone? It's a pretty easy question to answer. Why not answer it truthfully?
Do you acknowledge he was fighting with armed federal agents engaged in enforcing federal law?
If by "fighting" you mean "trying to protect himself so he wouldn't be beaten to death", then yes.
ICE Watch member just trying to protect himself while drinking his latte, huh?
Are you now going to tell me that ICE arrested the 5-year-old with the cute little hat? Ignoring that both parents abandoned him?
In related news:
A$AP Rocky’s ‘Don’t Be Dumb’ Debuts at No. 1 on Billboard 200
https://www.billboard.com/music/chart-beat/asap-rocky-dont-be-dumb-number-one-billboard-200-chart-1236162371/
I think progressive militants all need to have Obama and Clinton's speeches on illegal immigration played on repeat.
Then they need to see Obamas kids in cages, and be reminded of their silence until Trump took office and did the same
Then they need to see Obamas ICE numbers, and be reminded of their silence until Trump took office.
Its almost like they are just being whipped up as shock troops for the media and DNC because orange man bad
Who gave Obama the epithet of "deporter-in-chief"? Was it Republicans?
And who would have reelected him for the rest of time if they could have? Standards only matter when they justify voting Democrat. Fuck off.
Under Noem's leadership, the agency has moved its focus to immigration enforcement—pulling and cutting resources from other operations, like the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to carry out the president's mass deportation campaign.
Shifting a federal agency's focus based on a new administration's priorities? Well, I never!
Hopefully the next administration will bring federal resources back to the Founders' intent: DEI.
Well, that and comprehensive wealth redistribution to achieve material fairness.
With cuts to FEMA, who will ignore red counties in coastal states during the next hurricane/election season?
It's not like FEMA was doing a whole lot with their funding, anyway.
Suicidal empathy foe the west is a main strategy of Marxists. See jeff, sarc, and shrike.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/suicidal-empathy-another-front-ccps-hybrid-war
The real insurrection. Treat Minneapolis like Atlanta during the Civil War
Fact Check: Peggy Flanagan, Anita Smithson, and others in anti-ICE Signal group in Minneapolis?
https://news.meaww.com/fact-check-peggy-flanagan-anita-smithson-and-others-in-anti-ice-signal-group-in-minneapolis
At least two Democrat Minnesota state officials and a campaign adviser to Tim Walz, Amanda Koehler, have been identified as “admins” and “dispatchers” in a now-leaked Signal group chat used to stalk and impede federal immigration operations in the state.
Minnesota National Guard hands out donuts, coffee to protesters in Minneapolis
https://www.cbsnews.com/minnesota/video/minnesota-national-guard-hands-out-donuts-coffee-to-protesters-in-minneapolis/
The left has people on the inside tracking their political opponents.
Sorry Twin Cities, You're Being Tracked Everywhere You Go
https://twincities.citycast.fm/podcasts/sorry-twin-cities-youre-being-tracked-everywhere-you-go
According to crowdsourced data on the website Deflock.me, there are over 300 Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras in the metro area. Most of these are made by a company called Flock Safety, and they allow law enforcement to use photos of license plates to track drivers every time they pass by one of these cameras. The legality of ALPRs continues to be fought over in our courts, so we're revisiting a conversation from earlier this year with ACLU Minnesota Attorney Alicia Granse about what these cameras are doing in our cities and how they could be regulated ethically.
All funded by Marxist foreigners to boot as being tracked by Data Republican.
Looks like DR finished her work.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/2015620564787105892
It’s big, and it’s deep. And it extends outside the US.
And nothing happened....
Yet. This is a clear signal (pun intended) that the government is the enemy of the people.
...nor will it.
Weird that the US citizen that got nuked from orbit extrajudicially by O never got any tears, but retarded lesbians who park their cars and then ram law enforcement cause a nationwide tantrum.
Its almost like there is a wild double standard of coverage and outrage that favor the DNC based on a massive media ecosystem made to do so
And another question is raised by the reckless brutality on full display now. Are agencies like ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) doing what they claim? Are you safer now? Is your money well-spent? Is the government doing what it ought to be?
This is the type of shit we saw during trumps first term. The left resists with violence and reason blames trump doe the lefts actions.
There are literally 40 states without this violence. The violence is all initiated from the left.
For a rag that decried a J6 Insurrection, you seem to ignore an actual one.
Politicians and activists fomenting violence to get what they want. Back to the old KKK days.
Reason, what side are you going to choose?
By the way... Dave Smith interviewed nick Fuentes. It was pretty amiable and friendly. Thiught Dave Smith had to be shunned like you claim with others who interviewed him. Like Tucker Carlson. You want to look consistent right?
Of course it was amicable. Both hate the jews.
Hell, there 3,153 counties without the violence. 9 counties are 2/3 of ALL the assaults on federal employees. 9 fucking counties.
Yup, it's ICE who is the problem.
Liz is just ENB without the hooker fetishization...yet.
"The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy: How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?"
Get fucked Liz.
It raises hard questions for the pro-open borders supporters of how many sacrifices they need to their cause? Exploiting these deaths to stop enforcement of immigration law is gross.
Infinity martyrs. It seems dying for the "cause" is all these people have. Doesn't really matter what. Black lives, illegal lives, rapist lives. The religion is endless.
The Left loves their useful idiots.
Never thought I'd see "libertarians"' lining up to be amongst those idiots, but that is where we are.
Yep. Dave Smith. White courtesy phone.
"As rumors circulated that the administration would target Maine's Somali population, "I stopped carrying the 9-mm compact handgun—a Glock 19 equipped with a Holosun red dot—that I keep underneath my shirt most days, in full compliance with Maine's concealed-carry laws," writes Tyler Austin Harper in The Atlantic. "Although it is completely within my rights to carry concealed in my state…the past few weeks have made it apparent that ICE and Border Patrol don't put much store in the law or Constitution.""
A few things here:
- What does this guy deciding to not carry a gun have to do with Somalis?
- The Atlantic is now pushing 2nd Amendment Rights? This is the magazine whose staff felt "unsafe" about Kevin D. Williamson working remotely, several states away from the magazine's offices.
- Well, if you are not confronting ICE and not an illegal alien, I do not think is going to bother you.
Also, Dave Smith is something of a midwit.
There was some large hilarity when Newsome came our decrying 2a eights even though he signed a bill banning carry during protests.
Labour opens door to ‘Stalinist’ 15-minute cities across Britain
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/labour-opens-door-stalinist-15-180555760.html
The most high-profile example of such a plan is in Oxford, where the council put forward proposals to divide the city into six “15-minute neighbourhoods”.
Under the scheme, drivers would need a residents’ permit that allows 100 days of free travel per year through six traffic filters during operating hours.
Meanwhile, a separate permit allows 25 days of free travel per year through six congestion charge locations during charging hours, and after this, drivers face fines if they travel without the relevant permission.
Greg Smith, shadow transport minister, said: “This is the blueprint for a national rollout. Labour has given the green light for draconian councils like Oxfordshire to police how people live, move and drive, using cameras and fines backed by DVLA data.
“Oxford is the test case, but this is Labour’s blueprint for the country.”
Met Police bans 'Walk With Jesus' march to avoid provoking local Muslim community
https://www.gbnews.com/news/london-news-met-police-bans-ukip-march-muslim-community-whitechapel-tower-hamlets
Scotland Yard has stopped a Ukip march from going ahead in east London over fears of provoking the local Muslim community.
The demonstration, titled "Walk With Jesus", was scheduled for January 31 in Whitechapel - long home to one of Britain's largest Islamic populations.
Metropolitan Police officials said permitting the event in that location would be "reckless" given the potential for violence.
“Metropolitan Police officials said permitting the event in that location would be "reckless" given the potential for violence”
But they don’t mention who will get violent.
But they allow the rape with mohammad marches!!!
"Our sexual assault of children is speech, your speech about sexual assault is rape!"
Hey, if superior academic intellectuals can't tell us how to live who can?
Meanwhile, a separate permit allows 25 days of free travel per year through six congestion charge locations during charging hours, and after this, drivers face fines if they travel without the relevant permission.
I'm sure we'll get an article from Reason "Congestion Pricing" Magazine about the databases and "Papers, Please!" checkpointing that this policy assumes as foregone conclusion.
Presumably, immigrants wouldn't be subject to the confines of such oppressive imaginary social constructs. Or, even the native people traveling just outside their own 15 min city on an off day will become illegal... again in their own city... or outside their own suburb or burrow for the more urbane among us.
This is all part of Xi's intense escalation toward ensuring all top military officials are loyal to him and him alone.
Commies gonna purge.
Good thing none of those Chinese officials had DEI accusations leveled against them and weren't teaching critical race theory.
What the fuck is wrong with you? You want to compare the Trump admin to the most murderous party in the history of the world? The unbroken rule of the CCP has been responsible for over 100 million deaths in the last 75 years.
Hey, don't you know that every time Trump speaks or appears in public, millions of progressive snowflakes die?
Antifa Signal chats possibly led by the Lieutenant Governor. Yes, this shit goes all the way up.
https://x.com/datarepublican/status/2015620564787105892?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
And the chat:
https://x.com/camhigby/status/2015093523733733474?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
There’s a lot to digest here. Take your time and read it all.
And the Signal chat is back up again.
https://x.com/camhigby/status/2015807311399338064?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Have fun infiltrating them: https://x.com/datarepublican/status/2015818379656143160?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
And nothing happened.....
That’s the part that’s pissing me (and many others) off. It’s long past time to arrest Walz, Flanagan, Frey, Ellison, and others.
Can't arrest. Federal judges in their district won't allow it. And activists on grand juries won't indict. Dems are running the same playbook they did when they ran the south.
Then we need tribunals. Which, if I’m not mistaken, means the Insurrection Act must be invoked.
Oregon sees increase in lethal suicide prescriptions; many patients unaccounted for
Nearly a third of all patients who were prescribed lethal drugs last year in Oregon are unaccounted for.
https://www.ewtnnews.com/world/us/oregon-sees-increase-in-lethal-suicide-prescriptions-many-patients-unaccounted-for?redirectedfrom=cna
However, nearly a third of all patients who were prescribed lethal drugs last year in Oregon are unaccounted for, as their “ingestion status” is listed by the health authority as “unknown.”
According to the report, of the 607 patients for whom prescriptions were written during 2024, 333 (55%) died from ingesting the medication, with time from ingestion until death ranging from seven minutes to 26 hours, with a median time of 53 minutes.
Canadian woman was euthanized 'against her will' after husband was fed-up with caring for her
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15489605/canadian-woman-euthanized-ontario-maid.html
An elderly woman was euthanized within hours of her husband claiming she changed her mind after insisting she wanted to live.
You have to accept this happening so that the Jeremy Boal's of the world can feel better about their conditions.
I wonder if there is any "disparate impact" in how the benefits of being put to death by the state, for your own good, are being distributed.
Canadian woman was euthanized 'against her will' after husband was fed-up with caring for her
What good is the patriarchal construct of marriage if you're not gonna use it? We agreed-to-disagree about "till death do us part" for 40-50 yrs. and now we agree. [tilts arms, crosses arms]
If a man can't euthanize his wife the way she can euthanize her unborn clumps of cells, who can he euthanize?
They were both unwanted clumps.
It's an age old method of getting a divorce.
King Henry VIII approves.
So can the lethal suicide prescriptions be used for capital punishment? Because one would think these method's would not be used if they were not merciful.
Of all the retarded things Libertarians advocate for, assisted suicide might be the most retarded. The same people who claim you can never trust the government, turn right around and trust the government not to coerce people into suicide.
The same people who claim you can never trust the government
Through between no less than 1 and 2 trials before appeals with multiple judges, attorneys, juries, and expert witnesses.
Hair samples with a single dog hair are a sign the government fucked up and killed an innocent person, but two doctors who, two weeks ago were all "100% safe and effective" and "a girl born with a penis is a girl" and have, for decades, been known to prescribe treatments they themselves would not undergo, nodding in assent to each other guarantees nobody was intentionally killed under the wrong circumstances.
I would guess that some of those doses were used to commit murders in other states.
26 hours? WTF?
It's time, Mr. President. It's time for you to go ahead and invoke the Insurrection Act and get the communist filth in this country under control. And if they want to continue to martyr themselves for these putzes like Tim Walz and the Somali thieves, by all means keep killing them, the fewer of them, the better.
And while you're at it, you may want to look into going after their funders as well. Your people know exactly who they are.
Applying my version of the Golden Rule (treat people like they treat you), what do we think Comrade President Harris would do to right wing protesters violently confronting her federal DEI agency enforcers?
I Let My Wife Have an Affair. Do I Have to Console Her Now That It’s Over?
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/24/magazine/wife-affair-ethics.html
By Kwame Anthony Appiah
Kwame Anthony Appiah has been The New York Times Magazine’s Ethicist columnist since 2015 and teaches philosophy at N.Y.U.
Cucks all the way down.
Does a lack of testicles make transitioning easier?
And levels within levels of stupid BDSM cosplay cuckoldry.
Not "My wife and I tried swinging." or "My wife and I tried opening up our marriage." or "My wife and I separated and she had an affair.", but "I let my wife have an affair." *followed by* "Dear Internet, I need other adult-aged children to tell me how to deal with this."
MN broke out in rioting and insurrection, backed by local authorities, right after we found out that billions of tax dollars were being stolen there.... with the help of local authorities.
And reason will ignore the billions in fraud, ignore the leftist violence, and blame trump (including becoming less than mediocre liz), all to give the left what it wants.
Thank god for the riots, otherwise Reason might have to cover the fraud.
Anyone wonder what Reason will say when a packed Supreme Court legalized abortion up until the fetus is old enough to vote and red states start 'resisting' Federal authority?
Thank god for the riots, otherwise Reason might have to cover the fraud.
You know they wouldn't.
We remember their outrage over anybody being near the Capitol on 1/6 being tracked down and arrested as opposed to their outrage over, say, CHOP/CHAZ, BLM riots, etc.
They are a more poorly written DemocratUnderground.
Can we now just hate everyone?
Murtaugh "God hates me, that's what it is. "
Riggs "Hate him back; it works for me".
Murtaugh: “I’m getting too old for this shit.”
Everything that happened before and after the guy interfered with and resisted police is mostly irrelevant. If everyone stops doing that, none of this happens.
"I stopped carrying the 9-mm compact handgun—a Glock 19 equipped with a Holosun red dot—that I keep underneath my shirt most days, in full compliance with Maine's concealed-carry laws," writes Tyler Austin Harper in The Atlantic.
I CCW every day, and I won't stop. I also refrain from interfering with the police.
Oh. Look ar mr basic responsibility over here.
Despite what the MAGAs are trying to gaslight people into believing, the video is clear. He did nothing wrong, was not brandishing a gun, and did not resist arrest. He tried to help the woman and was immediately attacked and beaten by six ICE thugs. He was never given any opportunity to submit to arrest. His gun was removed and then he was shot.
He just got tried to stop the cops from arresting someone and then got into a fight with them. Other than that, he did nothing wrong. I think you and Jeff need to get out on the front lines and assert your 2nd Amendment Rights. Get out there and show those feds who is boss. Come on man.
None of them have taken me up on recreating the Good shooting. I will even let them be the ICE agent.
He just got tried to stop the cops from arresting someone
You are referring to the woman with the orange backpack? The officer wasn't even trying to arrest her, he just shoved her to the ground. It wasn't an attempt at an arrest, it was an assault. When the officer acts like a thug, the privileges of the badge go away (or at least they should).
Molly, you too are welcome to attempt the experiment I have Jeffy above:
Go to Minneapolis and join an Antifa group. Go with them and follow ICE around. Make sure you carry a pistol with extra magazines. Then get into a scuffle with them. See how fast you last with them and report back to us.
I triple dog dare you.
When ICE comes to my community I will join the protests, armed. But with my AR. Open carry rifles is legal where I am.
You missed "of" ChinaGodiva.
That might be amusing to watch, Dr. Retard, as it might just be the most retarded thing you’ve ever done.
Quite possibly, but there is much competition for that title.
Nearly all of which from you, asswipe.
Sweetie, you take the crown easily. Even Shrike isn’t quite this retarded.
I meant that bringing an AR to an ICE protest would not be the dumbest thing I have done.
Being a loyal paid ccp is probably worse.
They are in all 50 states. What is stopping you?
Please do. And when the federal agents ask you to drop your weapon, please aim it at them.
"Despite what the MAGAs are trying to gaslight people into believing, the video is clear."
Regardless of your lies, it is indeed. He fought LEOs and died as a result. We sincerely hope you do the same, asswipe.
The photo of the shooting in the Patrick Skinner X post is apparently AI generated. If so, then it is not an accurate depiction of what happened, and Skinner's commentary in the original post and Thomas Chatterton Williams' comment in the repost are bullshit.
If you die protesting ICE, do you get 72 trans women in heaven? Just asking for friend.
That’s a whole bag of ladydicks.
Sign sarc and molly up!
No,
Next question?
How many people have to die so we can have cheap labor?
And Democrat votes. And source of kickbacks for Democrat pols from welfare fraud.
Geert Wilders, a major Trump ally, lost half his seats in the last election. This week his party lost another 7 MPs. They walked! Collapse in real time.
The last barrier to complete Islamification of the Netherlands.
https://www.muslimnetwork.tv/islam-emerges-as-fastest-growing-religion-among-dutch-youth/
Enjoy the fruits of open borders.
Are you safer now?
As a matter of fact, yes. Not that Reeeason would report on it. It would contradict all their pearl clutching and mockery over Trumps NG deployments.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/01/icymi-murder-rate-plunges-to-125-year-low-as-president-trump-restores-law-and-order/
Aah - the Libertarians in favor of extrajudicial murder of American citizens are here infesting the comments.
No, we want immigration enforcement to continue and people to protest lawfully and peaceably (both of which are mandated by the constitution) . Obstructing arrests, biting off agents fingers, ramming them with cars, destroying private and public prorperty must stop.
Problem is, you all seem to have a very narrow definition of what constitutes "lawfully and peacefully", and a very subjective one as well - a very narrow one that applies to the out-group, and a very broad one that applies to the in-group. Rioting at the Capitol is "peaceful protesting", but standing in the street filming cops is "violent resistance".
Just for the record, they are not MANDATED by the constitution.
J Fucked - asswipe in favor of organized crime posting lies here.
Not Libertarians. MAGAs. Libertarians would be aghast at government violence.
Matt “Red Wedding” Welch says otherwise.
Libertarians for open borders, no laws, and free stuff!
You stupid cunt.
Libertarian is the right word. It's a perverted term but the reality is that it is libertarians who perverted it. Rothbard is the one who transformed the term from its previous notion of a leftist anarchist to what is now generally seen as right-wing. Rothbard is the one who overtly allied libertarianism with the KKK and David Duke (and quite deliberately within the framework of unrestrained police violence against undesirables) as a way of undermining what he viewed as effete Hayekians. It is the Mises Caucus (the heir of Rothbard and the paleos/alt-right) that runs the Libertarian Party today. It is those folks who infest the commentariat (and some of the authors) here.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2015624443020591155
Meet Erik Martindale, a registered Florida nurse.
He says he won’t give anesthesia for Republicans undergoing surgery and believes that’s his right and is ethical.
He needs to be fired and stripped of his license immediately.
Or just left alone with some Republicans who survived his "treatment".
Irony. Ice takes down plane of anti-ICE lawyers.
https://x.com/steverob/status/2015797731348856997?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
White snow is racist.
[averts eyes from Ra's Al Gore's "Since 2000, women and minorities, who make up less than 10% of all pilots, were factors in 66% of crashes caused by pilot error." post]
I thought the White Males left Afghanistan.
Taliban Criminal Code Allows Child Abuse, Slavery & Executions, Says Rights Group
https://www.afintl.com/en/202601217253
https://x.com/Schwalm5132/status/2015470661490057540
As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.
What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.
Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.
This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.
The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in.
Not being spontaneous is not the same as being an insurgency. It is called good organizing.
It's called 'organize crime', shitforbrains.
Lying cunt.
+1
The compare/contrast v. Iran, AI, and the "dark web" ("dark social media"?) is also interesting.
That is, "our" Skynet would be stupid to launch cruise missiles and start churning out T-800s, that's a relic from a previous era of warfare.
https://x.com/DefiantLs/status/2015809453627462091
While Hillary Clinton spread lies about ICE arresting a 5 year old... this is what she had to say in 2014,
“Just because your child gets across the border, that doesn't mean the child gets to stay.”
What did she say about elian gonzalez?
'The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy: How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?'
I dunno. How many human sacrifices will be thrown into the volcano in the name of open borders?
'The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy: How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?'
Still looking for the first.
People have been doing this for centuries, yet there's a certain breed of champagne socialist that seems to believe that they shouldn't have to, that the state should provide for all their needs and wants, including emotions, which means punishing people who defy the socialist vision.
FIFY
"Homeland Security's sprawling deportation campaign is a marked departure from the agency's focus after its founding in the aftermath of Sept. 11. The department was created to protect the nation against foreign terrorists and work closely with federal and local agencies. Under Noem's leadership, the agency has moved its focus to immigration enforcement—pulling and cutting resources from other operations, like the Federal Emergency Management Agency, to carry out the president's mass deportation campaign."
If this seems surprising or disturbing, you might be an idiot. Or a Koch-sponsored open-border-tarian.
https://x.com/AFpost/status/2015649088872812792
Since 2000, women and minorities, who make up less than 10% of all pilots, were factors in 66% of crashes caused by pilot error.
Despite the disparity, major airlines are continuing to hire on the basis of identity rather than merit.
In January 2025, Delta CLO Peter Carter said the airline is “steadfast” in its DEI commitments and called them “critical to our business,” while United’s training academy maintains a goal that 50% of its graduates be women or minorities. Southwest likewise continues to pledge that it will “recruit, hire, and retain a diverse and inclusive workforce.”
What an odd coincidence.
https://nypost.com/2026/01/23/opinion/despite-trumps-efforts-airline-dei-programs-are-still-risking-peoples-lives/
Assisted suicide on the societal level.
https://x.com/Real_RobN/status/2015186826139738471
And we have found,
that more than 10,000 illegal aliens using the exact same Social Security number voted in the 2020 Arizona general election. And that’s only in the border state of Arizona.
Mike told me this was a lie.
As I predicted, Ra's Al Gore decided to make an appearance to flood the zone with old stories and rage-inducing clickbait in order to distract from the very bad day that Team Red is having with the Alex Pretti murder. It is oh so very predictable at this point.
Oh, go blow it out your fat ass. You come in with your own rage bait and then try to claim you’re some sort of libertarian, Marxist asshole.
"...How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?..."
Try starting with at least one, Liz. Or simply admit to being a TDS-addled steaming pile of lying shit.
"The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy: How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?"
Ask the neo-Confederate MN state government. They could let ICE pick up criminals at the jail, but they'd rather get their people to risk their lives so they can maintain political power.
Liz, this is really shitty, even for you.
The majority of the people that ICE is detaining now don't have criminal records. So even if the state government fully cooperated, ICE would still be in the streets dragging people out of houses.
What you are actually demanding is that everyone tolerate ICE thuggery and shut up about it.
"ICE would still be in the streets dragging people out of houses"
ICE goes to get the bad guys where they are and jeffy protests. ICE goes to get the bad guys at the courthouse, jeffy protests. Walz and Frey refuse to let police call ICE when they let bad guys out of jail and jeffy says norhing.
Jeffy's support is for the bad guys, not the rule of law.
I am in favor of the rule of law, provided that the law is just.
You, on the other hand, are in favor of giving the police authority to "enforce the law" even if it means the authorities themselves break the law.
Chucky's world:
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/MGTKYa4vdI8
Again your real complaint is that there are people who are upset that ICE is bending the rules.
Hey, asshole, being an illegal alien with a deportation order is enough. That by itself makes them lawbreakers.
The takes on this are insane. People interfering with the detention of criminals are getting hurt and shade is being thrown on the administration and agency that are enforcing the law.
If the protesters were to keep to observing and stay out of the way, none of these bad things would have occurred. The "peaceful observers" are putting themselves in danger and any sane libertarian take should acknowledge that actions have consequences.
If the protesters were to keep to observing and stay out of the way
That is what Pretti did. Watch the video I linked to above. The officer in in the beige cap initiated the entire incident when he walked across the street to shove the three protesters. That is what kicked off the violence.
The three protesters WERE out of the way. It was the ICE officer who initiated the conflict.
All 3 of them were in the street before the officer approached them you gaslighting sack of shit. You see how much traffic there is? You see how dangerous the situation is? You hear the whistle and epithets being shouted?
You could truthfully say the ICE officer initiated contact. But to say he initiated the conflict is a bold face lie.
The ICE officer initiated the VIOLENT conflict. That better for you?
Why did the ICE officer shove those protesters in the first place?
To keep them out of the street, the blocking of which is a crime you fucking retard.
What is often (Nearly always) being missed is the extreme negligence on the Minneapolis police. Instead of being bystanders to protests that are actively blocking roads, the police should keep the protestors out of the road. The Minneapolis police should not be expect ICE to perform crowd control without accepting the risk when things go wrong. This is a complete failure by the Minneapolis police, compounded by overzealous protestors and ICE agents. We should expect more from the Minneapolis police that sitting back and allowing protestors to commit federal crimes by obstructing a federal law enforcement operation. Hauling trash bins and parking cars in the middle of the road, violating private property to protest or committing acts of vandalism causing damage, is NOT simply being a "legal observer". While I believe in the right to protest, I DO NOT condone the actions of many of the protestors. These protestors who step over the line, should be arrested by the Minneapolis police instead of being encouraged by Mayor Jacob Frey, Governor Tim Walz and the police chief.
>And another question is raised by the reckless brutality on full display now. Are agencies like ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) doing what they claim? Are you safer now? Is your money well-spent? Is the government doing what it ought to be?
These are good questions.
1. No - but my state doesn't tolerate illegal aliens (or anyone else) committing violent crimes like NY and MN does so . . . violent illegals don't stay here, they go to NYC and Minneapolis
2. Yes. There is less fraud and violence in the country now.
3. Yes.
"The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy: How many unjust killings by agents of the state must be tolerated in the name of border security?"
And the other obvious question: "How many rapes and murders and drug deals must be tolerated in the name of violating the law for the sake of democrat votes?"
The scene in Minneapolis raises hard questions for those who had previously supported Trump's immigration policy:
What a fucking cop out. It didn't raise 'hard questions' at all for anyone including you. Those who support the brownshirts still do without the slightest question or hesitation. Those who opposed the brownshirts before the weekend still do. Nothing has changed.
What is becoming more obviously true however is Dietrich Bonhoeffer's observation about 'the stupid' (Dummheit) which originates from Schiller's Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens. There is no conversation - no reason - no instruction - no insight - no revelation - no interaction that can occur anymore. How can any of that happen when one side - the one SUPPORTING the power being manifest - is simply repeating slogans, catchphrases, etc with no more thought than a parrot (or an AI chatbot)?