Europe's Biggest Advantage in the Showdown Over Greenland? America's Huge Pile of Debt.
America's large and growing national debt is not just a budgetary liability, but increasingly a geopolitical one too.
When he was running for office in 2016, Donald Trump said he would pay off America's national debt in just eight years.
That, obviously, did not happen. Instead, the national debt has exploded in the decade since Trump made that promise.
But history must have a sense of irony, because accomplishing that task—or at least making some progress toward it—would have put Trump in a stronger position today as he threatens to seize Greenland against the wishes of Greenlanders, the government of Denmark, and the European Union. Instead, America's large and growing national debt is not just a budgetary liability, but increasingly a geopolitical one too.
"Europe owns Greenland, it also owns a lot of Treasuries," George Saravelos, Deutsche Bank's head of currency research, reportedly wrote in a memo to the bank's clients.
In case that implication isn't clear enough, at least one Danish pension fund is already following through on the threat. AkademikerPension announced Tuesday that it will be selling all $100 million of its U.S. Treasury bond holdings. Anders Schelde, AkademikerPension's investing chief, told CNBC that the decision was driven by "poor [U.S.] government finances" and "not directly related to the ongoing rift between the [U.S.] and Europe."
"But of course that didn't make it more difficult to take the decision," Schelde added.
That seems to line up with what Saravelos is warning about. "In an environment where the geoeconomic stability of the western alliance is being disrupted existentially, it is not clear why Europeans would be as willing" to finance the U.S. government's borrowing, the Deutsche Bank analyst reportedly wrote this weekend.
To be sure, there is little that Denmark or the E.U. could do to prevent the U.S. from militarily seizing Greenland. But Europe is the world's largest market and the largest holder of U.S. bonds. Any direct conflict between the U.S. and Europe—or even an indirect one, marked by rising tariffs, decreasing trade, and deepening mistrust—would inevitably come with serious economic risks for America.
Those risks are already taking shape. The yield on U.S. Treasury bonds spiked on Tuesday as global markets responded to the latest round of threats over Greenland. As always, bond yields are a reflection of investors' opinions about the riskiness of an investment—higher yields mean investors are demanding a higher payout to compensate for more risk.
From the federal government's perspective, rising bond yields mean higher interest payments on newly issued bonds—and that's on top of the interest payments on existing debt, which are expected to top $1 trillion this year.
Exactly how much economic damage could the E.U. cause if its various national governments and private investors decided to sell large amounts of their U.S. Treasury bonds? Let's hope we don't have to find out. The peaceful buying and selling of goods (and government debt) has been a tremendously beneficial arrangement for both Europeans and Americans. The unnecessary conflict Trump is now openly courting could quickly become an economic mess on both sides of the Atlantic.
Still, this is a useful illustration of something that debt hawks have been warning about for quite some time: The federal government's growing debt pile is becoming a geopolitical risk that limits America's ability to project power around the globe. In this narrow case, the leverage created by the debt might help steer the U.S. away from starting a foolish, unnecessary conflict. In another context, however, the risk could be more serious.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Is it a race between sullum and boehm to see who can get fired first with Lancaster cheering for both to tie so he can be the worst?
Naw, it's a race between Jesse and hisself to see who can ignore the topic at hand and sling insults the fastest and mostest.
Try paying attention: the Donald has stepped in it. He's not trying to pay down the debt, he's trying to increase it, he's raising taxes, and he's threatening allies. This particular gambit is pretty damned funny, countries raising US interest rates because the Donald is the Stupid.
You really do want to be the new loud and proud, and retard, sarc dont you buddy. Lol.
All because of your chosen stubborn ignorance to economics and reality.
Even here you claim he is raising taxes despite the tax cuts in BBB. Why? Because youre retarded?
You ignore the decision bills, the cuts on the BBB, etc. Why? Because you're retarded?
Then you say other countries raising US interest rates as a good thing? Lol. You also dont seem to understand how basics work. Fucking hilarious.
If you want to emulate sarc, do you buddy.
Apparently youre also too retarded to know i dont ever initiate responses to your retarded takes. But you're so desperate for me to laugh at your broke ass. Hope it isnt sexual.
Luckily you wont read this due to your belief that not responding in an hour gives you a win. Something so retarded not even sarc ever made that claim. Lol.
Eric, my dude is just trying to make America great again.
Back when America was great, it ran massive deficits and took over whatever pissant countries it wanted. There were Federal troops on every corner of Main St. USA, and children died by the scores of measles and whooping cough. Blacks weren't uppity, wimmenz knew their place, and nobody broke laws... ESPECIALLY dirty immigrants.
It was fucking libertopia, and you morans just can't stop being nattering nabobs of negativity.
While I don't appreciate the bellicose talk, the European threat regarding US Treasuries is pretty toothless:
Seven reason at link.
https://x.com/Kathleen_Tyson_/status/2013314168250675456
Yeah they're not going to do that. But Eric will get a handful of clicks.
Not going to defend our fiat currency but it's not like Europe is a better place to park your assets. Our economy is growing while they are committing green deal economic suicide. I'm hoping they buy gold and silver and make me wealthy. Meanwhile the Europeans need us a lot more than we need them. And by the way. Trump didn't get eight years and the four he had were spent fighting lawfare and phoney impeachments that Reason libertarians fully supported.
the four he had were spent
printing trillions so the states could shutdown because covid.
Well only the last year. But fair point.
America's large and growing national debt is not just a budgetary liability, but increasingly a geopolitical one too.
Right, let's use countries that only are at 96% of debt to GDP. I guess it's all relative.
The statutory deadline for the U.S. Department of Justice to release all unclassified records related to Jeffrey Epstein was December 19, 2025. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law by President Trump on November 19, 2025, required this release within 30 days. As of late January 2026, the Department of Justice has missed this deadline.
Perhaps the deadline was unreasonable given the 5.2 million documents, the need to redact the victims names, and the manpower of DOJ? Piled up, those documents are the height of a 20 story building. What are we hoping to find? Maybe it would be more efficient if the victims would come forward and name the names of their abusers?
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I guess we all got distracted by the anti ICE rioters and billions in fraud and Greenland and Venezuela and whatnot. From now on I for one will be lazer focused on the Epstein files.
The true irony is the truth in this comment. One issue threatens to affect Trump and his cronies directly while the others merely threaten to affect the lives of Americans.
I have to laugh every time I run across someone who's just sure that one more sex scandal will sink Trump.
https://fortune.com/2026/01/20/how-much-national-debt-grew-trump-first-year-back-in-office-president/
Trump added $2.25 trillion to the national debt in his first year back in charge, watchdog says
We can pay for it with our new 10% credit cards. Today is the day Trump decreed they be issued! Did you get yours?
Our growing debt pile is creating geopolitical risks that could prevent the US from projecting force everywhere.
That is of course an excellent end game even if we are too stupid to have gotten there without going broke first. The point however is that the goal is so positive that we should HOPE Europe uses that weapon to drive US interest rates so high that we can't possibly dick around everywhere on Earth. Certainly we never unelect our own irresponsible critters until after they destroy our economy
The problem of course is that Europe is too feckless to go beyond its own Russophobia so instead it relies on our deep state to photocopy our permaphantoms/enemies onto Europe. I cannot even think of a single European who might head a delegation to go to Russia to discuss that stuff absent US interests. That is the only way they can get beyond NATO and they can't take step one
Putin the Poisoner would screw everyone and anyone he negotiates with as he is all about 'Putin making Russia great so Putin can loot Russia'. He has the 'let's make lots of dark money for me and my friends' philosophy in common with Trump. Europe's caution with respect to Russia has a lot of good reasons behind it.
Maybe. Maybe not. But there is a very very long history of Western Europe viewing Russia through a lens of brutalist corrupt despotism.
Two things are certain:
Russia is always going to be Europes neighbor.
The US is never interested in having Europe be part of a multipolar mindset
Congratulations to Reason for focusing on the deficit. Maybe other's at Reason can focus on the problems of the Fed buying US debt. Regardless, handling the debt is not the problem, the spending is the problem that needs attention.
Wow, a rational statement in the reason comment section. I can't remember the last time I came across one of those.
Unfortunately, Reason has come out against efforts to curb spending.
They only seem to talk negatively about the debt when there are no real efforts to do anything about it, then when someone tries they suddenly whine about how it's just a drop in the bucket.
Can we get a fact check here? Europe may be the largest foreign holder, but IIRC, most US bonds are held by US citizens.
Also it's worth asking - how much of Europe's debt does the US own?
Never-mind Europe's debt or Europe's free-ride for security.
Europe can push, but it may very well end up with the USA leaving NATO. NATO effectively would cease to exist except for the symbolic two dozen personal that they recently committed to protect Greenland.
Europe is a paper tiger that speaks loudly with the support of the USA standing behind them. They forget that they are nothing without the USA standing behind them. They would need to shift their alliances to either Russia or China.
It clear that the Canadian prime minister is hedging his bets on Communist China. With Europe's hostility towards Russia, it's doubtful that they would align with Russia which could supply them with energy.
Where would Europe be with out Russian or US energy? Well Canada you say, except Alberta is attempting to leave Canada after being abused by the likes of Quebec and Ontario for decades.
Yes, Europe has all the advantages here Eric.
I strongly suggest that Denmark demand payment in cash, up front, in Euros.