Trump Claims He's Turning America Around. He's Really Doubling Down on Executive Overreach.
From immigration crackdowns to trade policy, the Trump administration is increasingly centralizing power in Washington, D.C.
In Wednesday night's address, President Donald Trump framed the first 11 months in his second term as a miraculous turnaround: order on our border, decreased costs of living, peace in the Middle East, and an economic comeback from the "brink of ruin." But beneath the boasting and exaggerated list of statistics lies a pattern that's common in Washington—expanding executive power and government-led "wins" that come with long-term tradeoffs citizens will ultimately pay for.
Trump's speech was a clear attempt at reclaiming momentum after his approval rating dropped to 39 percent this week, possibly worsened because of escalation with Venezuela. The tensions are causing widespread unease among Americans about another foreign conflict—especially after Trump's campaign promise that he would not bring the U.S. into any new wars. Presidents naturally turn to bold claims of "order" and "strength" when public confidence falls.
Though border crossings have decreased and Americans are generally less concerned about the Biden administration's dysfunction, the methods to get to this point are concerning: increased executive control, hiring more border agents, and a general disregard for due process. Order that's achieved through unilateral decisions is fragile. Reliance on emergency powers during every national crisis presents a tradeoff of short-term political wins while sacrificing constitutional balance.
Trump boasted about reducing the cost of living, saying, "The price of eggs is down 82 percent since March, and everything else is falling rapidly, and it's not done yet." Though egg prices have indeed fallen, the spike was caused by a bird flu outbreak that's since subsided. As for "everything else," government data released Thursday showed persistent inflation of 2.7 percent over the last year. Trump also marketed government meddling in the form of subsidies and tariffs as "relief," conveniently leaving out the fact that his policies have raised prices across the board for consumers and have been illegally implemented without congressional approval. This brings us back to business as usual—Washington politicians promising better quality of life through central power, typically leaving out the cost of these programs to consumers later.
The contrast of declaring "peace in the Middle East" while battling negative press on his tensions with Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro paints one of the most inconsistent moments of Trump's second presidency thus far. While promising peace, Trump's Department of Defense has bombed 27 drug boats killing 99 people, managed a build-up of US military warships and planes around Venezuela, and blockaded sanctioned oil tankers going in and out of the country.
Unfortunately, this type of foreign policy is now so common that Americans have become almost desensitized to its frequency. Wars now start without congressional debate, and national security is turned into a buzzword through televised (and tweeted) announcements. A personalized "peace" maintained by one president's individual decisions is not a lasting peace, but rather a pause until the next administration is elected and unravels it.
The speech closed with a powerful reference to the upcoming 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence, ironically contrasted with a year full of decisions made without the consent of the governed and a blatant expansion of state powers. Rather than applauding embellished rhetoric, Americans need to ask: Are we freer than we were 11 months ago, or are we simply getting used to an increasingly authoritarian executive branch?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
that's funny I feel a billion times more free now than during King Brandon
All hail lower court judiciary.
Ironically it was Kennedy who mentioned that something like 40% of the EOs are now codified in law.
Vast majority of EOs literally state "in compliance of the law", executing them to how laws are written instead of prior executive expansion. So deregulating. Undoing prior expansion. Executing the law as written. The horror.
Yet the Reason Ignorati is upset.
Fuck off you evil cunt. We are not an economic zone meant to be sucked dry by parasites from around the globe. Sorry the dysfunction and abuse of discretion you endorse now means harsher crackdowns but that's what happens when you leftists divorce yourselves from reality and call arson protests and car ramming attacks "peaceful protests". You offer nothing of value to anybody but nihilists looking to burn the world to ash.
She’s a lackey for ‘Young Voices’ which appears to be a Middle East policy group. Am I correct in thinking that they’re an anti Israeli organization funded by place like Qatar?
Well, we've been in the era of extreme executive overreach for over 80 years now. Should we really expect any president to stop doing it when the other party won't? That seems like a bad plan when dealing with practical politics. I'd love to have constitutional government and a restrained executive, but that just doesn't seem to be in the cards right now. Constitutional restraints on the federal government are mostly dead. I want to see it come back, but I don't see a clear path to getting there at the moment.
Some of what she calls over reach is simply enforcing laws as passed.
Jesse, you’re forgetting the ‘But Trump!’ exception.
So I've now read this drivel twice. It is a mess of ignorant propaganda. Even makes the claim enforcing the INA as written as executive over reach.
It is basically a democrats airing of grievances.
Wasn't shocked when I clicked on the bio.
“It is basically a democrats airing of grievances”
Yeah, but isn’t that part of Festivus? And if so, do I get a pass for beating the hell out of democrats as one of my Festivus feats of strength?
Can't it be both?
Orange man bad, mkay?
From a [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire to a *Constitutional* USA.
Oh the HORROR! /s
Nazi's don't 'repeal invasion' and they don't tax by 'imports' (both direct quotes of the Constitution).
They give away ?free? ponies!
Trump is hollowing out our [Na]tional So[zi]alist Empire! /s (straight from the DNC platform)
Trump is a fascist. That is what fascists do.
National Defense =/= Fascism!
The best you've got is EO-Tax implemented by FDR and the [D] trifecta.
Course every honest person around knows [D]emocrats are fascists.
It's literally written in the [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] history.
Is that what your ChiCom handler told you to say?
Walz +6
>>From immigration crackdowns to trade policy, the Trump administration is increasingly centralizing power in Washington, D.C.
You didn't seem too bothered by it when Mr 'Pen and Phone' was doing it. You cheered on when Mr Poopypants did it. You were perfectly fine with the President just overriding the public (and congress) by importing and flying across the country millions of illegals.
You cheered it on when he tried to make everyone wear masks and get a shot that offered minimal benefit. You cheered on Dr Science.
I don't care anymore, Margaret. Like old dude in El Salvador, sometimes you need a strongman to wrest the reigns back out of the hand of the deep state.
And here's the thing - I'm not really worried about a super-powerful President.
I am worried about an unaccountable bureaucracy that runs the government from the shadows.
The next Democratic president can't do a lot of harm *without* the backing of a ton of unionized government employees. So Trump can blow up the deep-state then President Harris can kackle to her heart's content in the Oval Office as far as I'm concerned.
*YOU* should be more worried about the executive bureaucracts that have been centralizing power within the executive branch, not a President doing it.