ISIS Gunmen
Plus: Universal child care polls well, DEI and generational dynamics, and more...
Gunmen in Sydney appear to have been motivated by ISIS: Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said yesterday in a news conference that the Bondi Beach shooters—who murdered more than a dozen Jews celebrating Hanukkah out on the beach—appear to have been radicalized by the Islamic State. "Radical perversion of Islam is absolutely a problem," said Albanese. The car believed to be driven by the suspects, Indian national Sajid Akram and his Australian-born son Naveed, had multiple homemade ISIS flags in it, as well as improvised explosive devices that were not detonated.
"Australian officials said Tuesday that both the father and son had traveled to the Philippines last month, and that the reasons for that trip were being investigated," per The New York Times. It's not clear yet whether that trip had anything to do with their radicalization or their planning of this horrific crime, but it seems possible, given where in the country they traveled. ("The Philippine Bureau of Immigration said they had arrived in the country together on Nov. 1, reporting their final destination as Davao, a city considered the gateway to the south of the country. Parts of the southern Philippines remain a center for Islamic State militant activity. The two men left the country on Nov. 28.")
The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.
Back in 2019, the son, Naveed, came under substantial police scrutiny. "Naveed Akram was closely connected to Isaac El Matari, who was arrested that year and later jailed for planning an IS insurgency as the self-declared Australian commander of the terrorist group," reports an Australian network. "Matari was part of an IS cell with several other Sydney men who have since been convicted of terrorist offences and were also close to Naveed Akram, according to sources with close knowledge of the matter." Naveed apparently tried to study Arabic and learn Koranic recitation back in 2019.
Sajid Akram was a licensed gun owner in Australia due to his membership in a shooting club.
Scenes from New York: "As Zohran Mamdani, the mayor-elect of New York City, prepares to go to battle in the State Capitol over his campaign promise to provide universal government-funded child care, he appears to have New Yorkers on his side," reports The New York Times. "A new poll released by Siena University on Tuesday found that nearly two in three voters across the state favor the new benefit and would support Mr. Mamdani's plan to pay for it by increasing taxes on those earning more than $1 million a year."
This is both predictable and disappointing. People love free things (or, rather, things they perceive to be free). I have a forthcoming magazine feature and video essay on why Mamdani's child care plan is doomed to fail, in part because Bill de Blasio's universal child care plan has been so roiled by inefficiency and bad seat allocation. But one thing that New Yorkers just seem totally unable to grasp: Child care is expensive because human labor is expensive.
"Child care is a prime example of the Baumol effect," writes economic policy analyst Jordan McGillis in The Washington Post, "in which prices for labor-intensive services rise even when worker productivity stays flat. What makes this possible is that wages in those sectors have to increase for employers (here, parents) to compete for workers who might otherwise be enticed to sectors further up the wage table." Worker pay alone tends to be about 60 percent to 80 percent of a standard day care's operating budget.
And Mamdani hopes to expand the existing universal child care plan to the youngest age groups—infants 6 weeks and older—which will require the highest caregiver-to-child ratios. There's just no way to make the math work, and there's no reason why the absolute richest people should subsidize the also-rich people, which is what the universal nature of the system leads to. But de Blasio said the quiet part out loud several years ago, when chatting with a reporter from The Atlantic: "Anything that has a broad constituency will also have more sustainability." This has become, in some sense, the mantra of the modern Democratic party: The wealthyish, highly educated based likes universal child care because they too stand to benefit from it (blissfully unaware of how this might drive prices up). Means-tested is out; universal social welfare programs are in.
QUICK HITS
- Catch me on this week's Reason Roundtable:
Forgive the puffy 38-weeks-pregnant face and don't yell at me for my, um, slight interest in Venezuelan regime change or my Jesus-y entertainment recommendation. He is the REASON FOR THE SEASON after all!
- What a sad, mean, ugly post:
Trump on Rob Reiner's death: pic.twitter.com/PWtHZsvGpR
— philip lewis (@Phil_Lewis_) December 15, 2025
- More details on the victims lost in the Brown University shooting: "Ella Cook, a math whiz from Alabama with a deep Christian faith and plans to study in Paris next year, and Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov, the son of doctors from Uzbekistan with dreams of becoming a neurosurgeon, were shot in a lecture hall during a review for an economics final," per The Wall Street Journal.
- "The Brother I Lost," by Megan McArdle at The Dispatch. Long, worthwhile musing on abortion and dying parents:
"I was surprised to learn that many women say they are having an abortion because they could never give their baby up for adoption. This seems like a confession that the life growing inside her is so precious to her that she could never bear to let go of it, which makes killing…
— Leah Libresco Sargeant (@LeahLibresco) December 15, 2025
- The generational dynamics at play during the DEI years:
"'enough white guys already'—seemed to me to be the mantra"
I know so many people who have told me they personally were told explicitly they were passed over, dropped from a project, or not hired because the company "needed diversity."
This is exactly how it's been in most… https://t.co/9XQQlu61Pc
— Inez Stepman ⚪️????⚪️ (@InezFeltscher) December 15, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Gunmen in Sydney appear to have been motivated by ISIS...
I don't think we're allowed to talk about this.
More right wing extremism according Albanese.
London's mayor Sadiq Khan joined that club, too.
'There’s a direct link between Trump’s language and how people become radicalised'.
"My concern about when President Trump says some of the things he does is he normalizes and brings to the mainstream views that I think are unacceptable,"
"And we've seen in the U.K. a massive increase in anti-Muslim hatred,"
"You know, intentionally or unintentionally, you are seeing people who are taking the views of the President of the United States as a green light to behave in a certain way,"
Sadiq Khan hates White people and Christians.
Look. If you just gave the left everything they demand they would stop the killings.
"And we've seen in the U.K. a massive increase in anti-Muslim hatred,"
Which has nothing to do with the activities of Muslims justified by Islamic teaching or done in Islam's name.
And khan was trying to shut down a vigil for the Bondi Beach victims by the local Jewish community for "safety" reasons.
Fvck that limey muzzle cvnt
Come on… don’t be shy. I’ll start… here goes. People that shoot up abortion clinics are ideological compatriots of people who shoot up synagogues.
Now you.
Ok, so when was an abortion clinic last shot up? How about a pregnancy help center?
The only places getting shot up are the ones that don’t offer abortions. So I suspect that it is a lot of the same people that shoot up synagogues.
We call them ‘democrats’.
The circles of that Venn diagram are quickly separating though.
Ukraine has been corrupt for decades. Even under Zelensky. But for nearly 5 years we have been told youre a conspiracy theorists for pointing it out.
Now even the NYT is pointing it out.
We are again seeing the standard leftist corporate media play out. Defend a narrative. Double down. Triple down. When evidence is too great, admit it is happening.
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/ukraines-anti-corruption-investigation-appears-be-brink-implicating-zelensky
Remember though you're still a racist for being prematurely correct. The truth doesn't exist until left wing institutions pronounce it, there is no independent reality.
Libertarians for Russian war crimes!
You’re a libertarian for Ukrainian corruption.
He’s not a libertarian.
Isn’t it Shrike pretending to be Sandra?
Or KKKaren. Maybe sarc. Either way it’s retarded.
Sarc can afford a paid account? That seems unlikely. The expense would compete with his alcohol consumption.
It's why, while I felt we should somehow help Ukraine fend off the Russian incursion, I knew that shoveling 10's of billions of dollars into Ukraine without any accountability was a mistake and guaranteed to not materially (materiel-ly?) help the situation but would line the pockets of the people in charge.
Knew this when it was revealed how many democrats were invested in the Ukraine even before the war.
Like the Bidens.
Australian officials said Tuesday that both the father and son had traveled to the Philippines last month, and that the reasons for that trip were being investigated...
Taking lessons from U.S. federal law enforcement, I guess.
The D stands for destructive.
https://x.com/iterintellectus/status/2000846259645514219?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
And the article that inspired it. It’s a long read, but worth it.
https://www.compactmag.com/article/the-lost-generation/
Is it just a coincidence that the quality of writing went down during that same period? Maybe.
Yass queen!
I don’t believe in coincidences.
That's a coincidence. Neither do I.
"What do we say about coincidences? The universe is rarely so lazy."
Sherlock Holmes
"It's 100% because of this."
tracerv
"I believe in coincidences, coincidences happen everyday, but I don't trust coincidences" - Garak.
Theirs less people righting good now.
https://x.com/matthewschmitz/status/2000556991375409159
It’s almost as if it were designed to destroy the US and Western Civilization as a whole.
Yes. Marxism in all forms gas that goal. Including cultural marxism.
There were comic books in the 50's that laid out this entire plan, which the left has followed to a 'T'.
Watch your average commercial these days. Rarely do you see a complete white family. More often it is a mixed race couple with mixed race children or a single working woman managing the family at home alone. If it is a white woman she is with a black guy or alone. Asian, with a white guy. Black women are also not as prevalent unless with a full black family.
Men are domesticated now. Cooking, cleaning, walking around with a kid strapped to their front. If they are white, the men are stupid. Old white guys rarely seen except in viagra commercials.
Pathetic.
The baby Boomers have never given an inch on their own entitlements, but they sure don't mind fucking over their grandkids for a little virtue signaling.
It's not the boomers that are driving this.
Everything is so terrible and unfair.
It really is in this case. The kind of fucking over young white males have been given in the last 10 years hasn't been seen since Jim Crow, and that's not hyperbole.
The DEI programs old white males have introduced with great fanfare have guaranteed that young white males don't get hired within huge swathes of Western white collar employment.
There is no DEI in the executive class though.
What are the odds Sarc is now paying too?
And how did you change your handle. I’ve tried several times and it wont let me.
What they/them said. ^
Everything is so terrible and unfair.
Racial discrimination went from the biggest problem in America to no big deal just by changing who we targeted. Solving America's problems has never been easier.
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Wall Street Apes
@WallStreetApes
Senator John Kennedy reads an internal memo from the Minnesota Attorney General's office
They openly say they did not stop the Somalia immigrant fraud because Democrats would lose votes
“Here's what a fraud investigator in the Attorney General's office said. She said, There is a perception that I'm quoting now, that forcefully tackling this issue would cause political backlash from the Somali community, which is a core voting block for Democrats”
Seriously, how are Democrats not getting raided and thrown in prison
Video
https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/2000353004281794978
How did Somalis become a core voting bloc of the DFL?
Because the DFL decided to import a dependable voting bloc.
"Radical perversion of Islam is absolutely a problem," said Albanese.
No, the problem is, it's not a radical perversion.
Not every Muslim, but always a Muslim.
Not every Nazi....
How about the Kirk shooter, Trump shooter, CDC shooter, Minnesota representatives shooter, ICE shooter, etc.?
Trantifa in most cases. The FBI just busted a cell in LA.
Or CIA.
Not every leftist, but always a leftist...Muslim; leftist...potato; potahto.
But enough about Bella Ramsey.
Ha
LOL okay, the Minnesota shooter was leftist. So were Dylan Roof, Brenton Tarrant, Anders Brevik, and Tim McVeigh.
LOL okay boomer, are you still rocking a goatee on your MySpace account, fu?
Haha. What a doosh.
>>How about the Kirk shooter, Trump shooter, CDC shooter, Minnesota representatives shooter, ICE shooter, etc.?
none targeted Jewish people.
That is like saying, "Not all men but always a man".
Even those claiming to be women.
When your example of a perfect man is a child raping, mass murdering, theiving slave owner, there is no place for "moderates". All Islam is radical based on western standards.
+1
And the religion was spread by conquest and subjugation from the start.
Normalized culture of Islam. Fixed it for him.
There is a case to be made that perhaps the Muslim moderate is the perversion of what Islam teaches, and the "radical" is the one closely following the text.
Right. "Moderate", peaceful Muslims are revisionists, and they are persecuted and sometimes murdered by orthodox Muslims. True Islam is radically perverted.
There is a case to be made that perhaps the Muslim moderate is the perversion of what Islam teaches, and the "radical" is the one closely following the text.
And I think it's a strong case.
If you see pictures from the Middle East and North Africa from 100 years ago, everyone is in three-piece suits with bowler hats. Women dress in Western looking clothes and are out in public without controversy.
It was after WWII with the rise of the Arab nationalist revolutionary movements that suddenly Saudi Arabia is back to chopping thieves' hands off, the men even in big cities are back in the nomad gear, and the women are back in hijabs. This was largely driven by a "let's get back to true Quranic Law that we've been getting lax on in recent centuries" movement, where previously most of the Islamic world was in more of a "these old books don't really mean what they literally say" place.
"Radical perversion of Islam is absolutely a problem," said Albanese.
Just get in your goat costume and bend over already.
Sajid Akram was a licensed gun owner in Australia due to his membership in a shooting club.
I wonder which will come under more government and media pressure: Aussie law enforcement for knowing the son was being "radicalized" or the gun club for existing.
Option 2. Their politicians and pundits are already calling for tighter gun 'regulations'.
Time to join a stabbing club so they can legally own machetes.
I think Scranton's Machete club has a recent opening.
I thought they did that in 1996.
Are they saying those regulations failed?
because for almost thirty years,. i read Australians boasting about how those 1996 regulations eliminated mass shootings.
Except that they haven’t, even by an Outback mile. They just had one back in October that didn’t kill anyone. One would expect the number to be lower than the US simply due to lower population.
Gotta love the Bee:
https://babylonbee.com/news/australian-man-who-wrestled-gun-away-from-terrorist-charged-with-unlawful-firearm-possession
heroic man who bravely wrestled away a rifle from an Islamic terrorist during the deadly shooting at Bondi Beach on Sunday has been formally charged with the unlawful possession of a firearm.
"Rest assured, this man is going away for a long, long time," confirmed Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon. "No one breaks our gun laws and gets away with it. No one. We have him on video, dead to rights."
Authorities identified the man who illegally held a gun for three minutes as Ahmed Al Ahmed, a Syrian fruit shop owner who thought he was helping when he fought a terrorist and stole his gun away to protect the lives of innocent people. But what he didn't count on was for the entire ordeal to be caught on video.
Ahmed was reportedly shot multiple times during his altercation with the armed gunman and treated for his injuries at a nearby hospital. After waking up from surgery, he discovered he was handcuffed to his hospital bed. Shortly after, a police officer read him his rights.
"I see now that what I did was bad," Ahmed said. "I should never put lives in danger by touching a gun. Shame on me!"
At publishing time, Ahmed had been denied bail.
In all seriousness, after waiting 11+ minutes to do anything at all, police officers on the scene finally did approach and shoot the 2nd unarmed civilian who ran in to kick away one of the terrorists guns after he was shot.
https://x.com/nypost/status/2000702736199803150
(Not Ahmed al-Ahmed, but a 2nd guy, who also happens to be a Muslim migrant. al-Ahmed was apparently shot by one of the terrorists.)
If he were white they would have charged him with a hate crime for tackling the terrorist.
Also the Bee:
https://babylonbee.com/news/vowing-to-stop-violence-australia-bans-hanukkah
To stem the growing tide of violence against Jewish citizens, the Australian government has moved to officially ban the celebration of Hanukkah.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made the announcement in the wake of Islamic attacks on a public Hanukkah celebration, which Albanese believes prompted the killings.
"If Jews were not celebrating Hanukkah, this tragedy could have been prevented," said Albanese. "Some people don't want to blame Hanukkah, but let me ask you: did people get shot anywhere else except at the Hanukkah celebration? No. This is all because of Hanukkah. How many lives do we have to lose because of Hanukkah before we act?"
The Prime Minister then immediately issued an order officially banning Hanukkah, menorahs, Stars of David, and "anything else those people with the hats do to cause violence."
A few Australians pushed back on the decree as an infringement of religious liberty, but to no avail. "Sounds like someone is in league with Big Hannukah," responded Prime Minister Albanese to his critics. "I think it's disgusting that people would care more about their precious little holiday than saving lives. They're probably getting paid by Israel to say that."
At publishing time, Australia had announced they would go ahead and ban all religious celebrations other than Muslim, just to be safe.
I didn’t realize all you had to do to stay armed in Oz was join a gun club. Seems like a pretty big loophole.
That exception really boomeranged on them.
It was decided in a kangaroo court.
Yep. That's all you need to do to koalify for gun ownership.
Latest September numbers.
Exports up 3%. Trade deficit down 10%. Imports increased 0.6%.
God damn ripples.
And November jobs report, likely to be uses by Boehm as an attack on trump.
64k private sector jobs added.
162k government jobs removed.
For many this is a positive as government employment isnt a net benefit.
Labor participation rate also up due to wrlfare reforms under BBB.
We need to 10x that government jobs removed number
Sarc disagrees. Think about wait times or something.
...nearly two in three voters across the state favor the new benefit and would support Mr. Mamdani's plan to pay for it by increasing taxes on those earning more than $1 million a year.
I wonder how many of those two out of three voters will, in a few years time, wonder why high earners no longer live in the New York.
At least 2 out of the 3.
BUT WHICH TWO?
Both of them.
Will the applications for free child care be provided in Somali?
wonder why high earners no longer live in the New York.
According to Reason, "high earner" is roughly twice the minimum wage.
Child care is a prime example of the Baumol effect...
Of course the solution is to import more and more unskilled labor to drive prices down.
Only if government can subsidize their employment. This is the Soros Open Society strategy.
Demand open immigration. Open immigrant dependent business. Demand government subsidize it. Profit.
Soros did the above throughout the EU as well.
It’s why globalism is so good for individual liberty!
Imagine the flexibility of food, shelter, healthcare, child care, free immigration, and just about everything else becoming a right rather than a responsibility.
What a sad, mean, ugly post:
It’s the karma Reiner deserved.
More outrage over that post than the cheering of Kirk being assassinated.
I certainly found the celebration over Kirk's murder far more outrageous. But this was still pretty shitty.
A shitty response to a shitty person who died by the very suicidal empathy he lived by. He had decades to help or cut out the kid and always chose one more chance and feel good fix-it BS over solutions and accountability that might work.
Kirk wasn't just murdered, he was assassinated.
Reiner was murdered, not to make light of it. Maybe it was because of politics, maybe it was because of his parenting, maybe his kid is nuts. I don't know.
I don't really care about Reiner's politics, his entertainment products were often pretty good over the years. His death is a loss even if his politics weren't mine.
After all the shit Reiner said and did about Trump, I think Trump gave a pretty tempered response.
Trump didn't cheerlead legal warfare against Reiner. Trump didn't incite people to try and assassinate Reiner.
After all the horrible stuff Reiner did, I'm shocked that people think Trump should have given a hagiography.
He didn't need to praise him. Saying nothing would have been a fine option.
Maybe so, but it's still sad, mean and ugly. "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything" is a pretty good rule for the day after two innocent people were murdered, whatever they thought of you.
I dont believe in one sided rules myself.
Prefer the NAP. Not exactly like the left has been playing by the same rule you lay out.
If you are losing something or missing opportunities by not adopting your opponent's rules, then fine. I don't see that as the case here. What does this accomplish other than to convince some fence sitters that Trump is just an asshole? These murders had nothing to do with politics. Just say "thoughts and prayers" and move on.
Seriously, this is just the stupidest type of own goal. Why the fuck would anyone want to make this murder about themselves, and not the murderer?
Respect is earned, not given. That is my ethos. When someone shows you who they are, trust them. That is my ethos.
This applies to family as well. Have had family steal from me despite being generous with them prior.
With strangers I assume amicability. When they attack me, I respond in kind.
Life is not holding oneself above others, especially in light of repetition of bad acts of others. That ethos is how we get subsidizing the homeless, releasing criminals, subsidizing drugs. And society has been worse for it.
Part of libertarianism is responsibility. That includes making people accountable foe their choices, not forgiving and ignoring those choices.
This doesnt mean one cant be charitable. But stop wasting resources on those who spite you despite the charity.
I'll add one thing. Not sure if youre an objectivist or read Ayn Rand
But in the Fountainhead they have a rich character who portends to be an individualist. But he spends most of his time theough empty actions of subsidizing collectivist and basically supporting those who disagree woth his and Roarkes views. Basically subsidizing against his own beliefs. He ends up realizing he was an antagonist at the end.
That to me is essentially what youre asking to be done. Show far more grace and subsidize revealed hatred for your own beliefs. Even in presence of knowledge of said actions against them.
The character believed himself to be righteous in believing his charitable funding of his enemies was good. So I dont play by the lefts false comity. They freely serve rules for you to follow they themselves will never do. Hoppes also has an essay discussing this, allowing those against you to set the rules or assumptions in arguments. So again I refuse.
I could never get past teh first few pages of Ayn Rand but I live by this rule. every now and then i think I should give money to PBS since i do like some shows but no they are to far left the rest of teh time for me to help out. why support someone or group who will use those monies to attack, harm or even outlaw my life
Do they still show reruns of Fawlty Towers?
I think that would depend on the station. I get two different PBS stations where I am, one from Chicago, and one from NW Indiana. They have different shows.
yes.
The Fountainhead and We The Living are actually good.
Said character was also a critique of the Nietchean overman.
I see what you mean, but I do think that sometimes it's still better to be the bigger man and stay out of the petty bullshit. I don't think he'd be giving anything away by being a bit more statesmanlike here.
The Roarke way is fine and dandy. But once you dip your toes into criticizing criticism that toe is in the water.
Have to agree. Trump isn't helping himself or his agenda. More likely he'll drive up his negative ratings.
+1
It wouldn’t hurt him to not act like an asshole once in a while.
“Way to own ‘em Trump!” with another stupid fucking post, this time about murder victims.
^ He's the President of the United States of America, for God's sake. Grow up and act like it.
What does this accomplish other than to convince some fence sitters that Trump is just an asshole?
No! Not the the Chase Oliver demographic!
The gay demographic?
Goes with "Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt." But Trump does not possess the gene that keeps his mouth (or fingers on keyboard) from just spouting whatever pops into his head. Sometimes that's wonderful, sometimes hilarious, sometimes just wrong.
Funny hearing this from people who thought anyone who criticized Kirk after his killing should be fired.
Who'd you hear that from?
I’ve never said any such thing.
Just criticize huh shrike?
It's gonna cost Shrike a lot of money to keep running his sock farm. It'll be interesting to see how many he'll pay for.
It wasn’t over criticism, dingbat, it was over them dancing and pissing on a grave. And if you do the same to Reiner, I think you deserve the same.
They weren't just dancing and pissing they were calling for more actions against those they dislike. it is one thing to say you disaprove of what Kirk said even after his death, it is another to call for more of it.
This. They were making lists of who should be next.
Trump literally said he doesn't want the best for his enemies, so his response to Rob getting murdered by his drug addict son doesn't surprise me. Sure, it's in bad taste, but it's not surprising Trump wanted to chime in.
Now what is actually unexpected is that people on the left aren't scouring X for people like doctors and teachers celebrating Rob's death in order to get them fired. Surely they would want to do the same thing the right did to them when Kirk was politically assassinated.
I’m sure they are, they’re just not finding any.
They are more concerned with people making the OK hand symbol than people celebrating Reiner's death.
people on the left aren't scouring X for people like doctors and teachers celebrating Rob's death in order to get them fired.
They got a power company worker fired for cracking his knuckles because they believe moving your fingers is close enough to the ok symbol which is white supremacy. You think they aren't looking?
They have been. Just not a lot to choose from unlike the left.
Find me a throat slashing gesture mocking Reiner. I'll wait.
Just to be clear, we're still talking about a President who, himself was almost assassinated and continues to be repeatedly burned in effigy. Moreover, In the same society that, after Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck in front of his family, took shots at Tim Pool, raped corpses and stabbed people to death on New York subways, and killed national guard members in front of the White House.
Mean tweets are an ugly thing, but not the ugliest. Trump never claimed to be The Lightbringer (and even if he did, everyone should know better).
Everybody seems to have forgotten Reiner's statement that he wished that Trump hadn't turned his head at that rally.
I sure did.
When did he say that?
Bluesky I believe.
It is a case of best say nothing.
Silence is violence. If you're going to be burned at the stake either way, might as well make yourself known.
From the Daily Wire:
President Donald Trump praised a 43-year-old man who disarmed the gunman who opened fire at a Jewish event in Australia on Sunday, saying the man “saved a lot of lives.”…
“In Australia, you probably read … a very, very brave person, actually, who went and attacked frontally one of the shooters and saved a lot of lives … very brave person who’s right now in the hospital. Pretty seriously wounded. So, I have great respect to that man that did that,” Trump said.
Oddly havent seen much praise or mention of the first 2 victims of the tragedy who also tried disarming them.
https://www.foxnews.com/world/bystanders-seen-confronting-australian-gunman-during-isis-inspired-deadly-rampage
I have to say that the tweet is basically an own-goal from Trump. He could have just said "Rob Reiner and I obviously disagreed on pretty much everything, but I'm praying for him and his wife to rest in peace." or even better, just leave out the complaint--it's obvious and well-known. So just skip right to the "It's a tragic end..." and come out looking magnanimous, even if that is twisted by the media eventually somehow.
I guess he figures if there's no way for him to win, he might as well twist the knife.
he's the scorpion on the frog. He can't help himself. It's just what it is
Trump doesn't "figure". He has a thought and it immediately blows out his ass. I suppose there are positive aspects to a leader being that transparent.
Updated for modern audiences:
Rob Reiner wakes up in Hell and Donald Trump begins showing him around a resort more beautiful than Mar-A-Lago. "This is where I'm going to spend eternity?" Reiner asks. To which Trump replies, "It's your estate to do with as you wish. It's the afterlife, it's not like there's a shortage of real estate or anything."
Trump takes him around the estate and shows him his garage full of ICE muscle cars. "These too?" Reiner says. "Why not? How are you supposed to get around in Hell without a nice car?"
Trump then takes him into his mansion full of the beautiful teenaged, adult, biological women that his wife has given him a hall pass to grab as they will allow. Reiner is incredulous. Trump picks up the sentiment and says, "Eternity is a long time, we wouldn't want people getting bored or lonely. And don't worry your wife is as content with her estate as you are with yours."
As they walk on, Reiner notices a high fence. Peeking through it, he sees massive wildfires and people dying of heat exhaustion for lack of water and air conditioning, pedophiles and mongrel hordes chasing down and raping children, gender affirmation doctors skinning children's genitals, women being beaten for trying to compete with men wearing dresses, people drowning in the rising oceans, old people being denied medical care and the mentally infirm being injected with COVID vaccines and MAID drugs to see which kills them first...
Reiner reels back in horror. "What... is... that?" Trump replies, "Oh that? Those are Progressives. I don't know why, but they prefer it that way."
P.S.- I'm outside the 24 hour rule, so it's OK, right?
^+++++++++++++^
Trump should read the room in moments like this. But the truth is, if your son was messed up like this and you were known for being singularly obsessed with a politician and demonizing people with certain beliefs, it’s not a good look.
TDS is real. Yeah, the son in an adult and responsible for his own actions, but people around him had some moral obligation to stop him from hurting others.
These democrat pigs think Trump is worse for saying that than Nick Reiner is for actually murdering both his parents.
Think about that.
"A new poll released by Siena University on Tuesday found that nearly two in three voters across the state favor the new benefit and would support Mr. Mamdani's plan to pay for it by increasing taxes on those earning more than $1 million a year."
Just do it. Everything is completely predictable. Taxes will go up, child care prices will sky rocket, child care will get substantially shittier (for those that can afford it). We have seen this movie. Electric cars, college tuition, etc.
They just fail to understand that free shit will never be free.
Dont forget the millionaires leave.
Also remember that these people think they are so much smarter than everybody else.
Also remember that these people think they are so much smarter than everybody else.
Well, did it ever occur to you to make childcare free?
Rule 1. Dont cut your parents/family off over politics.
Looks like democrats already failed.
They didn’t purge established Boomers. Instead, they did everything possible to avoid hiring white millennial men.
Millennial men suffering under the grand delusions of millennail women trying to create thier egalitarian utopia.
This is the end result of twisting the meaning of words and terms beyond recognition - 'egalitarian' now means targeting a group for exclusion and ridicule on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation.
We can't lift some people up no matter how hard we try so we must bring some people down to make things equal. Because we all know equal is best.
That sounds as egalitarian as the Ku Klux Klan.
'egalitarian' now means targeting a group for exclusion and ridicule on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation
No - that's 'inclusive.'
'Egalitarian' means giving special privileges to certain groups on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation.
Evidenced by the recent Kentucky Karen democrat self hating white, but they always give away the game:
"I can only imagine how much privilege a white man walks around in this world with"
They really have worked the diversity system to be "not the first lined up against the wall" and have benefited massively from glomming on to the DEI train. Evidenced by the biggest beneficiary of DEI and AA was white women.
Throwing young white men under the bus as a sacrifice to the DEI gods
Trump on Rob Reiner's death...
When did politics develop such sharp elbows?
Why do Hollywood types have such crazy kids?
Money, drugs, and free time?
Same as it ever was. It's the same reason so many talented musicians die young.
I mean, the kid got a crocodile in spelling.
When narcissistic vomit became Prez
That would be January 20, 2009.
But that one caused a tingle up Jewfree's leg.
Lightbringers going to light bring.
I was surprised to learn that many women say they are having an abortion because they could never give their baby up for adoption.
jfc
Chick logic.
Seems to be an oxymoron, at least in this case.
We should put people who think like this in charge of stuff, especially courts of law.
Mrs. Casual is watching Homeland. In once scene, Clair Danes' character, who suffers from manic depression, routinely drifts off her psychological meds, and has slept with at least 3 different characters in the show at this point (the specific one being a complete stranger she met at the liquor store), takes a pregnancy test that comes back positive. She chucks the test in a drawer full of used pregnancy tests that are mixed positive.
Mrs. Casual says, "What?!", pauses it and rewinds. I said that I took it to mean that this isn't her first (non-birthing) pregnancy. Mrs. Casual looks at the drawer and says "No way. There are at least 30 pregnancy tests in there. That would mean 30 abortions. 30 abortions is not possible. It's a chemical pregnancy."
It's chick logic all the way down and I'm just lucky to have been on the mostly correct side.
routinely drifts off her psychological meds, and has slept with at least 3 different characters in the show at this point (the specific one being a complete stranger she met at the liquor store), takes a pregnancy test that comes back positive.
I've never seen this show, but reading this description, it'd be like watching a show about my ex wife.
I've never seen this show, but reading this description, it'd be like watching a show about my ex wife.
Beats the hell out of "six or 20 ex-wives all vying for the same man or sell real estate or tend bar in LA" that she normally watches.
Women are encouraged to be extremely narcissistic and unaccountable in today's culture.
They call it "therapy".
If I can't have it, no one can.
"'enough white guys already'—seemed to me to be the mantra"
Thank Gaia that wasn't racist or things could have gotten sticky.
People with doctorate have taught you cant be racist against whites for decades now. How dare you disagree with experts.
Skin color is the most important thing.
When does the white male reparations movement start?
We all get a stick of gum and an applebees cupon.
applebees cupon
30g ration of chewing gum, and the Applebees coupons still in the mail. Don't be surprised if it winds up being a Temu or Alibaba giftcard.
Winston Smith's next edited headline: "Good news, citizens! Despite the shortage of chewing gun, we have been able to increase your ration to 25g of chewing gum!"
You beat me to it.
"Radical perversion of Islam..."
Is it though?
How were they doing Islam wrong?
Sahih Bukhari (52:177) - Allah's Apostle said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. "O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him."
This is exactly how it’s been in most offices in America: legacy boomers and to some extent Gen X white guys kept their jobs at the top, but there was absolutely zero room for “another white guy” coming up from below.
It's a good article overall, but focus on his repeated insistence he doesn't blame the beneficiaries, but rather the older white men who already had jobs. This is short-sighted, wrong, and cowardly. He's framing his objections so that he isn't "that guy", a motivation he describes in the article. He has to find a politically acceptable group to blame and therefore the villains must be some element of white men even when white men are being discriminated against. But scapegoating this group is just as wrong as scapegoating white males, or any other group. Many of them may be cowardly, but he doesn't know who fought against it. Further their cowardice is similar to his in the early years where he supported this movement.
In reality we have racial discrimination because young minorities and women wanted it. It was their campus protesting (at the urging of campus activist leaders) which normalized racial discrimination in education and hiring. Every protest included the demand for increased race based hiring. Usually this was on campus because that's where protest leaders wanted to work, but as soon as this model proved successful it was exported to allied and left-controlled industries including journalism and Hollywood.
Everyone on the left politically is to blame for this, not some tiny group of white men mostly trying to weather the storm. The generational hatred pushed in this article is just as damaging and wrong as racial hatred.
Everyone on the left politically is to blame for this, not some tiny group of white men mostly trying to weather the storm.
Exactly what a white man would say.
I mean, those boomer men were literally in charge of many companies that went 'woke' during the rise of DEI so...it couldn't have happened without them on board. I don't know about hanging the whole thing around their necks, but it would seem they were part of the problem at the very least. Bob Iger comes immediately to mind.
The boomer accountant down in finance, probably not so much though. Plenty of guys like that were the one's that were fired because of DEI, so it's really hard to blame them. Collective guilt is funny that way.
I mean, those boomer men were literally in charge of many companies that went 'woke' during the rise of DEI so
Were they? I know boomer men who were middle management, teachers, and insurance salesmen.
If you know someone who made those decisions you should name and shame them rather than hiding behind generalities and scapegoats.
Marc Andreessen gave a more thorough and worthwhile rundown of this on the Lex Fridman podcast when H1B Visas and Affirmative Action were on trial for essentially this very issue.
Andreesen still (mostly) stops short of calling them cowardly, but he does pretty blatantly accuse them of "preference falsification" and even highlights how, in a Nietzschean übermensch (not Hitlerian) sense, they failed and fail to transcendentally/morally self-actualize and hold back or punish the human race because of it.
Found on X, and describes so succinctly what we observe.
“It’s amazing how much leftist discourse pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible.”
- @MillennialWoes
It bears repeating everywhere regarding leftists, including here.
“It’s amazing how much leftist discourse pretending not to understand things, thus making discourse impossible.”
- @MillennialWoes
This is tangential to the Douglas Murray quote about how in our modern society we seem to have forgotten how to do things we've always known how to do, and act as if we're cock-sure about other things that aren't clear at all.
GenX definitely felt the squeeze. We were just higher in the food chain when it happened. Just when we were supposed to be reaping the windfall of the boomers retiring.
Instead, boomers didn't retire, and when there was a promotion available ...
And now we get passed over for being too old.
GenX definitely felt the squeeze.
^
In the very early '90s I had more than one college I applied to reject me explicitly because my racial demographic was full. Up until 2004 I was pursuing an academic career, but I saw the writing on the wall even then and got out.
.
Somalian in the US mocks Americans:
“You work all f*cking day… Thank you for working so hard so I can be home all day free. Go to work for me white boy… Go to work for me you f*cking white animals!”
WE WANT HIS IMMEDIATE ARREST AND DEPORTATION LIVESTREAMED PLEASE
@Sec_Noem
@DHSgov
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/2000954226118172826
First - I want reparation payments.
It's absolutely insane to import foreigners to suck on the public teat. Civilizational suicide
Child care is expensive because human labor is expensive
Human labor in a market/price setting is expensive. And day care involves a lot less labor than what used to occur -for semifree (or better unpriced and certainly not included in inflation adjusted CPI baskets) when a one income family was considered not just aspirational but even a bit normal.
The expenses required for things like day care and higher taxes generally make a two-income family effectively a one-income family, when all is said and done.
This has been a triple edged sword. All of this discussion has an unstated assumption of revolving around white people. I don't think black women had the same expectations or opportunities to be stay at home moms.
Women had zero economic value in the work force. This made them dependent on men. Women couldn't even open a bank account, much less get a mortgage.
The trade off was that men (white ones, at least) had inflated earnings with less/no competition from women and minorities.
The wage curves bend at the time when women entered the work force. Women had more independence, but men lost economic leverage. The result was that single earner families became less and less sustainable for many/most.
Wages necessarily suffer when you double the workforce without increasing the consumer base.
This must have been observed in the 1940's, when women went to work in factories en masse.
Thirty years before, some women even trained to be ambulance drivers for WW1.
In each occurrence, women usually left the workforce. It wasn’t until about 1971 that they stayed in the workforce.
And there were a lot of men leaving the workforce to go fight a war.
I don't think black women had the same expectations or opportunities to be stay at home moms.
I think that's true - with broader repercussions. Part of the covert racism of the suburb (and really American media culture of the 1950's) is that it was designed, early on, for stay-at-home moms. That is also who 'fits in to the neighborhood and who doesn't". With the corollary over time of helicopter moms and Karens. When in truth that particular cultural window was mostly a post-WW2 artifice. The early city had plenty of early work inside someone else's home opportunities in cities - and of course farms where everyone is working in the family business.
The wage curves bend at the time when women entered the work force. Women had more independence, but men lost economic leverage. The result was that single earner families became less and less sustainable for many/most.
Which becomes very obvious in the stats - though conveniently ignored by many. Median personal income for men has gone nowhere for 50 years. For women it has gone up by 50% or so - but most of that is because of increased labor force participation not increased real median pay (though clearly there are some glass ceiling changes).
Further what is being ignored by the - things are so bright now don't need shades crowd - is how many people are relying on asset inflation (heloc's - but of course asset price increases aren't really inflation) to keep up with real goods inflation (which is perpetually being lied about by the we don't need shades crowd). Which 'works' until the next generation can't afford to get into the homeownership asset bezzle.
And when you strip out all the bs and lies from the stats - and drill down deeper into jobs - what gets exposed is the 'productivity increases income' myth. Which is now playing out with the VC/WallSt hype about the US AI model.
Sorry to hear you don’t have what it takes to get ahead in life.
Universal child care polls well
Of COURSE it does. Via various regulations we've made childcare so expensive, even middle class families stretch to pay the costs. This is how the game works... the shit is chess, it ain't checkers.
You raise the cost of everything and then the people that fucked up the system claim they have a solution: socialism. We've seen this play out hundreds of times. Be careful the next time you agree to disagree...
Start by eliminating degree requirements for baby-sitters.
Start by eliminating degree requirements for baby-sitters.
And minimum wage requirements for teens.
Gunmen in Sydney appear to have been motivated by ISIS: Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said yesterday in a news conference that the Bondi Beach shooters—who murdered more than a dozen Jews celebrating Hanukkah out on the beach—appear to have been radicalized by the Islamic State. "Radical perversion of Islam is absolutely a problem," said Albanese.
I like how every middle class white progressive becomes an expert Theologian with a focus on Islamic study and Textual interpretation of the Khoran every time Islam kills a bunch of people.
Albanese called for stricter gun laws before bodies were cold.
Did he forget Australia tried that in 1996?
Yes, he said it was something to be proud of.
And yet he wants stricter laws.
If the 1996 laws worked, why need stricter laws?
If the 1996 laws failed, why need stricter laws?
Civilian Safety isn't the goal, it's the excuse.
>>A new poll released by Siena University on Tuesday found that nearly two in three voters across the state favor the new benefit and would support Mr. Mamdani's plan to pay for it by increasing taxes on those earning more than $1 million a year
bet it's easy to name who was not polled.
A policy giving people free stuff and force people they hold in contempt pay for it (in theory) is not disfavored? I am shocked.
I'm still a big fan of "for each according to his beliefs" when it comes to taxation.
People who believe in socialism - 100% tax.
Democrats - 80% tax.
Libertarians - 0% tax.
>>The generational dynamics at play during the DEI years:
not my fucking fault the millennials never learned playground rules. number one, never give up.
>>More details on the victims lost in the Brown University shooting
ludicrous they don't have this guy yet
I hope the conspiracy theories are interesting at least.
she seems to be a singled-out target & Brown is hiding the @reasons
Leader if the only "right wing" group on campus.
Christian.
>>But one thing that New Yorkers just seem totally unable to grasp: Child care is expensive because human labor is expensive.
which New Yorkers the millionaires or the illegals?
>>What a sad, mean, ugly post:
what an "I've never walked in his shoes" judgmental reply.
When someone tries to have Liz imprisoned and incites assassination attempts against her, we'll see how big she is about it.
Liz isn't the president.
the president isn't required to hug your delicate sensibilities because someone you didn't know but he did know dies
The question isn't what's required, but what will actually, possibly make anything better.
I guess. in T's world Billy Crystal likely lambastes him for thoughts & prayers too so why not be T?
Ann Coulter & the Prepubescent Nazi both hated it, so I like it.
How is that an argument, Zeb?
If I did to you all the things that they did to Trump with Reiner's incitement, aid, assistance and blessing, I believe you may have the right to be salty about it. Doesn't matter if you operate a honeywagon or if you're the pope.
This isn't like with Kirk, who went out of his way to respectfully engage and talk with his political opponents. Reiner was a the opposite, a hate filled demagogue who incited assassination attempts.
He has the right to say whatever he wants. The question is whether it does any good. My argument is that the president has obligations beyond his personal feelings. I don't agree with Trump on lots of things, but I do want more people to accept that he's not literally Hitler and might be a good thing overall for this country. I don't think things like this help with that.
Maybe I'm wrong and it doesn't matter. But it also wouldn't matter if he just kept his mouth shut.
"But it also wouldn't matter if he just kept his mouth shut."
Well that's true, but not keeping his mouth shut has been Trump's schtick since the 80's.
I thought Trump's post was tacky and tone-deaf, considering that most people on the political right were saying something along the lines of 'Wow, I didn't agree with his politics, but I don't think he deserved this.'
Didn't really get upset about it, just sort of rolled my eyes and moved on.
Same. Indifferent.
People see this as a way to attack trump, which is the reason they are "upset." Even when they likely have far worse posts.
I hope I'm not coming off as particularly upset about it. It came up here today, so I thought I'd argue about it for a few minutes. I do think it was in poor taste and unhelpful, but the world is full of things that are in poor taste and unhelpful, so it's not a big deal in the grand scheme of things. I do think that Trump could do better appealing to people who aren't exactly MAGA enthusiasts, but who don't suffer from massive TDS (i'm pretty sure I'm not the only one) and shit like this doesn't help.
You know he's not running again, right?
>>Forgive the puffy 38-weeks-pregnant face
procreation should be celebrated.
>>and don't yell at me for my, um, slight interest in Venezuelan regime change
the current regime is a fraud. Kat Timpf is not a credible source.
"Child care is a prime example of the Baumol effect," writes economic policy analyst Jordan McGillis in The Washington Post, "in which prices for labor-intensive services rise even when worker productivity stays flat. What makes this possible is that wages in those sectors have to increase for employers (here, parents) to compete for workers who might otherwise be enticed to sectors further up the wage table." Worker pay alone tends to be about 60 percent to 80 percent of a standard day care's operating budget.
Fun with numbers... let's take a look at the system the way it exists now, chart and graph it, play a little financial whackbat and voila! Answers!
Minimum wage in my town is ~$22 an hour. It's soon to be $25 an hour in New York. That puts your low wage worker at between $45,000-$52,000 annual salary. Once they get a couple of years experience, that number only goes up from there. Add in state mandated healthcare, unemployment, L&I etc., and who knows what that number becomes.
Not to get all Jordan Peterson/Mary Harrington on your asses, but there was a time when childcare was much more informal and community based. In no particular order:
Far more households were single-income and childcare was handled by stay-at-home mothers. These mothers, it turns out, were actually contributing to the economy mightily-- despite whatever 'nth wave' feminists kept griping about. As Mary Harrington points out: Just because her name wasn't on the deed doesn't mean that she had no meaningful economic contributions. Even when a family didn't have two full-time workers, childcare was often shared between families that had a single earner.
Next, childcare was largely unregulated. A local woman in the neighborhood would take in kids for a few bucks a week, per child to make some extra scratch. Turns out these informal childcare relationships were invaluable. Unfortunately yes, sometimes things went wrong in these types of settings which, alas demanded more regulation, licensing and oversight including but not limited to ratios of childcare 'workers' to children.
In the end, we got the system(s) we asked for. Sorry, New York Libertarians, this IS the platonic example of the modern economy being "better than ever".
Far more households were single-income and childcare was handled by stay-at-home mothers. ... Even when a family didn't have two full-time workers, childcare was often shared between families that had a single earner.
And even this paragraph needs to be buried under a mountain of men actually live like this memes and centuries of financial data showing that, while men controlled 75% of the income, women controlled 90+% of the spending.
Even within the "men live like this" microcosm, the closest men get to parity is with the gaming system and TV and, even then, women account for 51% of consumer electronics spending.
Yep. ISIS. Totally just ISIS.
We won't ask what motivated ISIS.
So Australia will enact its own Patriot Act?
nobody needs to ask the motivation of two animals with rifles.
Yes, yes, ignore their motivation. Nothing to see here. Absolutely no problems caused by unfettered immigration.
okay tell me the motivation that counts for murder I'm interested
The irony of following a story about the murderousness of Islam with a story about Zohran Mamdani, without a hint of awareness.
OT: A House if Representatives Subcommittee is/was holding a hearing on “the cost of youth sports” today.
I’ve read, re-read, and read again Article I Section 8 of The Constitution of The United States of America and I can’t find an enumerated power in any of its Clauses that makes “the cost of youth sports” anything the Government of The United States needs to investigate, much less which it needs to or can regulate.
Amendment 10, Section 2 (the one written in invisible ink):
"Just kidding! Congress and the President can do whatever the hell they want if they think it will get them some votes"
Commerce clause.
And let me tell you, a politician's graft is indeed commerce.
"Child care is a prime example of the Baumol effect"
Might I suggest as a devil's advocate that freeing parents up for a wide variety of productive jobs might end up being win-win for society at large even if the price of day-care labor is neutral overall? Day-care workers might have no particular productive skills and employing them in that role while increasing the availability of more skilled parents to produce goods and services might result in a net gain in productivity. Although I'm not advocating subsidizing this with tax funds, theoretically it could be economically desirable. I know of at least three major corporations that provide daycare benefits to their employees with skills but incomes that would otherwise place payment for daycare out of their reach due to the Baumol effect.
Why is taking care of your kids my problem? You made the choice, now live with it.
Has anyone asked Jack Nicastro who the real villain is in the Bondi Beach Shooting?
I mean it seems really obvious, but you know - there's layers or something.