Another Afghan Ally Detained Despite Legal Status
Mohammad Ali Dadfar survived the Taliban, the Darién Gap, and a monthslong journey to the U.S. only to be jailed by ICE while his asylum case is still pending.
On October 10, Afghan asylum seeker Mohammad Ali Dadfar fell victim to "Operation Midway Blitz," an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sting to find drivers whose licenses were issued in so-called sanctuary states.
According to Dadfar, he was on the phone with his brother at a weigh station in Indiana when masked ICE agents signaled him to end the call. Only after arriving at Greene County Jail in Springfield, Missouri, was Dadfar able to contact his wife to tell her he had been detained. He reported being forced to remove his clothes while agents asked if he had documentary proof that he was in the U.S. legally. Dadfar told his wife that the agents never examined the document he provided.
The 37-year-old was an employee of the Afghan Army for 14 years, and helped U.S. forces repel the Taliban until the terror group took hold of his city of Mazar-i-Sharif while storming their way to Kabul in August 2021. Rather than wait for the Taliban to fulfill the death threats they made against him previously, Dadfar fled to Kabul and attempted, unsuccessfully, to board one of the evacuation flights departing Kabul International Airport.
After the deadly chaos at the airfield subsided, Dadfar spent six months in hiding before rejoining his family to flee to Iran through Pakistan. Dissatisfied with the treatment they received in Iran, the family applied for humanitarian visas to Brazil and relocated. For a year, Dadfar's family shared a communal home with 13 other families and struggled to obtain work and long-term housing. Finally, the family decided to undertake an arduous six-month journey to the U.S. border to seek asylum.
Dadfar's youngest daughter nearly drowned while he carried her on his shoulders across a powerful river in the Panamanian jungle near the Darién Gap. His wife told The Colorado Sun that she saw "six or seven dead bodies" in the jungle. Though the family escaped alive, Dadfar's children emerged with eye infections, covered in sores.
Upon reaching Mexico, Dadfar's family applied for asylum through the CBP One App. After they received an appointment to plead their case, the family was allowed to enter the U.S. after submitting biometric and fingerprint data. Dadfar received parole and work authorization, which does not expire until June 17, 2026. Dadfar also has a pending asylum case, with his next court date scheduled for February 2026.
Upon examining the new legal document purportedly describing his current situation, Dadfar found that it stated that he would be safe if returned to his home country. Dadfar's wife told The Colorado Sun that he was "never asked" whether it was safe for him to return to Afghanistan. "He is not safe if he goes back to Afghanistan," she contradicted, noting that the Taliban continue to seek out and murder their former enemies.
On November 12, Dadfar's attorney, Rekha Sharma-Crawford, filed a writ of habeas corpus on Dadfar's behalf. Sharma-Crawford says that the court ordered the government to show cause for Dadfar's detention by November 17. When the government failed to meet the timeline, the court granted an extension until November 21. Again, the government did not meet the deadline.
"He is obviously very frustrated," Sharma-Crawford says after a video call with Dadfar. "He doesn't understand why he's detained. He had all of his documents and papers in order. There's really not a reason or any legitimate ground for him to be in custody right now," she says.
Given that Dadfar "is in legitimate status," Sharma-Crawford says that she is "hopeful" that the court will rule in Dadfar's favor, either releasing him or ordering a bond hearing.
ICE did not respond to questions about whether Dadfar's court documents were filled out without his consent, and whether his pending asylum case should have protected him from arrest.
Support for Dadfar, like with other Afghan allies, has come from across the political spectrum. Republican Teller County Commissioner Dan Williams is advocating for Dadfar's release, and Rep. Joe Neguse (D–Colo.) is working with Sharma-Crawford to assist Dadfar.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Here is a list of all Muslims that should be in the western world:
Yep that's all of them
I'm tired of all this one-sided cherry picking. Yes, ICE is behaving badly. But their behaving badly doesn't include raping children, stealing millions in aid and sending it to terrorists, or passing out drivers licenses to illegal immigrants who can't understand enough English to answer cops' questions, can't understand basic pictorial traffic signs like NO U-TURN, and haven't even got enough simple common sense to not try making a U-TURN on a freeway. And oh bye the way, many of these illegal immigrant evils are either facilitated by government employees, or directly done by government employees ... like issuing CDLs to illegal immigrants who are not qualified to drive anything on any public roads, let alone 80,000 big rigs. Or like forgiving past crimes, and dismissing current crimes.
Why not trying cherry picking the evils committed by some illegal immigrants and their government supporters and enablers?
Or better yet, why not try a little research and compare the two? Tally up all the ICE evils, tally up all the illegal immigrant and non-ICE government evils, and let readers decide which one is worse?
If there was anyone who still thought maybe MAGAs were capable of cohesive thought, this post would dissipate that misunderstanding.
If anyone thought MollyGdiva was capable of a cogent point-by-point rebuttal instead of Kamala-level word salad, this should disabuse them of that loco notion.
It's not "cherry-picking" if the purpose is to disprove the assertion that the mass roundups of foreign visitors were being done solely for the benefit of American security. It might be helpful if people who approve of mass roundups cited some actual cherry-picked examples of actual criminals who were apprehended who would not have been caught if not for the mass roundups, for which there has been only one so far that I recall. Those of us who think mass roundups do far more harm than good are justified in citing the dozen or two dozen egregious violations of the Constitution during the current hysteria.
It might be helpful if people who approve of mass roundups cited some actual cherry-picked examples of actual criminals who were apprehended who would not have been caught if not for the mass roundups, for which there has been only one so far that I recall.
Good point.
Those of us who think mass roundups do far more harm than good are justified in citing the dozen or two dozen egregious violations of the Constitution during the current hysteria.
Democrats violated the Constitution first, so whatever ICE does is ok. You should know this by now.
Here's a question that I never see addressed. My understanding of asylum per international law requires that individuals seek it in the closest country that will accept them. This guy was already granted residence in Brazil but decided that wasn't good enough. In order to reach the US he had to cross through 5 or 6 other countries. I agree with the concept of asylum defined as protecting individuals from political violence in their home country. But I don't see granting it to somebody who just wants a better house or job or protection from rival gang members. Seems the word has been distorted beyond all meaning.
Yes, it's more of that cherry picking. That is my understanding too, but I have always thought it was US law.
I do not rely upon "international law" to assess our immigration policy. American immigration law is stupid, counterproductive, unconstitutional and harmful.
Asylum: a form of protection granted by a country to someone who has fled their home country due to a well-founded fear of persecution. It provides safety and a right to stay, and requires the individual to prove a credible fear of harm based on their race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.
This guy might meet one of the criteria in Afghanistan. But it appears he already had asylum in Brazil.
Tough titties.
Dissatisfied with the treatment they received in Iran, the family applied for humanitarian visas to Brazil and relocated.
Muslims never are satisfied in Muslim countries.