Another Afghan Ally Detained Despite Legal Status
Mohammad Ali Dadfar survived the Taliban, the Darién Gap, and a monthslong journey to the U.S. only to be jailed by ICE while his asylum case is still pending.
On October 10, Afghan asylum seeker Mohammad Ali Dadfar fell victim to "Operation Midway Blitz," an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sting to find drivers whose licenses were issued in so-called sanctuary states.
According to Dadfar, he was on the phone with his brother at a weigh station in Indiana when masked ICE agents signaled him to end the call. Only after arriving at Greene County Jail in Springfield, Missouri, was Dadfar able to contact his wife to tell her he had been detained. He reported being forced to remove his clothes while agents asked if he had documentary proof that he was in the U.S. legally. Dadfar told his wife that the agents never examined the document he provided.
The 37-year-old was an employee of the Afghan Army for 14 years, and helped U.S. forces repel the Taliban until the terror group took hold of his city of Mazar-i-Sharif while storming their way to Kabul in August 2021. Rather than wait for the Taliban to fulfill the death threats they made against him previously, Dadfar fled to Kabul and attempted, unsuccessfully, to board one of the evacuation flights departing Kabul International Airport.
After the deadly chaos at the airfield subsided, Dadfar spent six months in hiding before rejoining his family to flee to Iran through Pakistan. Dissatisfied with the treatment they received in Iran, the family applied for humanitarian visas to Brazil and relocated. For a year, Dadfar's family shared a communal home with 13 other families and struggled to obtain work and long-term housing. Finally, the family decided to undertake an arduous six-month journey to the U.S. border to seek asylum.
Dadfar's youngest daughter nearly drowned while he carried her on his shoulders across a powerful river in the Panamanian jungle near the Darién Gap. His wife told The Colorado Sun that she saw "six or seven dead bodies" in the jungle. Though the family escaped alive, Dadfar's children emerged with eye infections, covered in sores.
Upon reaching Mexico, Dadfar's family applied for asylum through the CBP One App. After they received an appointment to plead their case, the family was allowed to enter the U.S. after submitting biometric and fingerprint data. Dadfar received parole and work authorization, which does not expire until June 17, 2026. Dadfar also has a pending asylum case, with his next court date scheduled for February 2026.
Upon examining the new legal document purportedly describing his current situation, Dadfar found that it stated that he would be safe if returned to his home country. Dadfar's wife told The Colorado Sun that he was "never asked" whether it was safe for him to return to Afghanistan. "He is not safe if he goes back to Afghanistan," she contradicted, noting that the Taliban continue to seek out and murder their former enemies.
On November 12, Dadfar's attorney, Rekha Sharma-Crawford, filed a writ of habeas corpus on Dadfar's behalf. Sharma-Crawford says that the court ordered the government to show cause for Dadfar's detention by November 17. When the government failed to meet the timeline, the court granted an extension until November 21. Again, the government did not meet the deadline.
"He is obviously very frustrated," Sharma-Crawford says after a video call with Dadfar. "He doesn't understand why he's detained. He had all of his documents and papers in order. There's really not a reason or any legitimate ground for him to be in custody right now," she says.
Given that Dadfar "is in legitimate status," Sharma-Crawford says that she is "hopeful" that the court will rule in Dadfar's favor, either releasing him or ordering a bond hearing.
ICE did not respond to questions about whether Dadfar's court documents were filled out without his consent, and whether his pending asylum case should have protected him from arrest.
Support for Dadfar, like with other Afghan allies, has come from across the political spectrum. Republican Teller County Commissioner Dan Williams is advocating for Dadfar's release, and Rep. Joe Neguse (D–Colo.) is working with Sharma-Crawford to assist Dadfar.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Here is a list of all Muslims that should be in the western world:
Yep that's all of them
I'm tired of all this one-sided cherry picking. Yes, ICE is behaving badly. But their behaving badly doesn't include raping children, stealing millions in aid and sending it to terrorists, or passing out drivers licenses to illegal immigrants who can't understand enough English to answer cops' questions, can't understand basic pictorial traffic signs like NO U-TURN, and haven't even got enough simple common sense to not try making a U-TURN on a freeway. And oh bye the way, many of these illegal immigrant evils are either facilitated by government employees, or directly done by government employees ... like issuing CDLs to illegal immigrants who are not qualified to drive anything on any public roads, let alone 80,000 big rigs. Or like forgiving past crimes, and dismissing current crimes.
Why not trying cherry picking the evils committed by some illegal immigrants and their government supporters and enablers?
Or better yet, why not try a little research and compare the two? Tally up all the ICE evils, tally up all the illegal immigrant and non-ICE government evils, and let readers decide which one is worse?
If there was anyone who still thought maybe MAGAs were capable of cohesive thought, this post would dissipate that misunderstanding.
If anyone thought MollyGdiva was capable of a cogent point-by-point rebuttal instead of Kamala-level word salad, this should disabuse them of that loco notion.
The federal government has always had a heavy hand. The cure for this is for states to comply with federal law and to assist ICE in their efforts. Immigration is a federal matter constitutionally and each state should accept that deporting illegal aliens is the will of the People. The Left has never believed in the principles of nullification or interposition so they shouldn't be bringing them up now, especially in regards to non-citizens.
Why is your Twitter account from china?
Stfu commie scum.
Tomy, you’ve been outed as a ChiCom dupe. So maybe you should spend more time running and less time shitpostimg.
It's not "cherry-picking" if the purpose is to disprove the assertion that the mass roundups of foreign visitors were being done solely for the benefit of American security. It might be helpful if people who approve of mass roundups cited some actual cherry-picked examples of actual criminals who were apprehended who would not have been caught if not for the mass roundups, for which there has been only one so far that I recall. Those of us who think mass roundups do far more harm than good are justified in citing the dozen or two dozen egregious violations of the Constitution during the current hysteria.
It might be helpful if people who approve of mass roundups cited some actual cherry-picked examples of actual criminals who were apprehended who would not have been caught if not for the mass roundups, for which there has been only one so far that I recall.
Good point.
Those of us who think mass roundups do far more harm than good are justified in citing the dozen or two dozen egregious violations of the Constitution during the current hysteria.
Democrats violated the Constitution first, so whatever ICE does is ok. You should know this by now.
How is enforcing the INA unconstitutional?
One-sided outrage then. But ignoring the other side's outrages, like raping children, ignores what makes so many people in favor of the mass roundups, and is preaching to the choir. Propaganda, nothing more.
If the author actually wanted to change minds and get more people upset at mass roundups, that other side must be addressed. To ignore it shows hypocrisy.
One-sided outrage then. But ignoring the other side's outrages...
Says the guy who is ignoring government outrages. Just like your mentor Jesse, you are accusing others of doing what you are doing while you are doing it.
Here's a question you will not answer.
What percentage of illegals are actually committing these heinous crimes, and how many of such criminals have been rounded up by ICE?
You won't answer because your outrage against people being one-sided is pure projection, and because it would ruin your case that all illegals are evil and masked government goons are all saints.
Damn you can't read either.
In other words, I don't know, and neither does Reason, and neither do you.
Gadzooks you are stupid.
You would know more if you paid attention. Studies have been done on the criminality of immigrants vs natives, and they found that immigrants, especially the illegal ones, commit fewer crimes. Logically that makes sense, because people who don't want to get kicked out don't want to draw attention to themselves. Yes some are criminals, but they are outliers. Contrast that with masked federal agents operating with absolute immunity from civil lawsuits and practical immunity from criminal law (because fuck you that's why). They don't care. They do what they want. And you're calling me stupid? Sure, Jesse junior. Whatever you say, I mean emote.
Edit: The muted turd dropped a grey box before the ink was dry on my comment. What a desperate loser. I almost wonder what he said. No. I don't.
This remains false. I have literally given you real evidence like Lotts prison study in arizona. You just fall for propaganda.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3289457
You consistently fall for false reports like CATOs Texas study which used status at arrest. And despite them retracting the paper after Texas pointed out legal status was determined post arrest, you keep pushing propaganda.
JizzeAzz, fentanyl deaths along with violent crime surged in April 2020 when illegal immigration was at record lows. The irony is that free dollars splooged all over the cuntry by Trump caused the crime wave and you can’t bring yourself to admit the truth. So sadz. 🙁
How is enforcing the INA an outrage?
Of the 10's of 1000's of violent criminals and pedos arrested and removed from the streets, you believe there was only legitimately 1? The rest were innocent people who deserved to be in the US?
WTF is wrong with you?
The vast majority of people illegal immigrants being rounded up by the masked federal agents come in two categories. Most of them either legally entered the country pending asylum proceedings and had that permission revoked, or they legally entered the country on a visa that has since expired. They're not hardened criminals. Do they deserve to be in the US? Ask the strawman that made that argument. But they are not criminals in the sense that they're going around harming others through force or fraud. They're just living their lives, without papers.
This is just a fucking leftist lie at this point. Over 60% already had final deportation orders. Over 70% were arrested for a crime.
You remain a lying leftist retard.
Nope. Swiping right on an illegal app from the Biden administration does not confer legal status.
"...foreign visitors...
"You misspelled "illegals", twit.
Here's a question that I never see addressed. My understanding of asylum per international law requires that individuals seek it in the closest country that will accept them. This guy was already granted residence in Brazil but decided that wasn't good enough. In order to reach the US he had to cross through 5 or 6 other countries. I agree with the concept of asylum defined as protecting individuals from political violence in their home country. But I don't see granting it to somebody who just wants a better house or job or protection from rival gang members. Seems the word has been distorted beyond all meaning.
Yes, it's more of that cherry picking. That is my understanding too, but I have always thought it was US law.
I do not rely upon "international law" to assess our immigration policy. American immigration law is stupid, counterproductive, unconstitutional and harmful.
Asylum: a form of protection granted by a country to someone who has fled their home country due to a well-founded fear of persecution. It provides safety and a right to stay, and requires the individual to prove a credible fear of harm based on their race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.
This guy might meet one of the criteria in Afghanistan. But it appears he already had asylum in Brazil.
Lol. My god the stupidity of this post.
So a country cant regulate their borders?
JizzeAzz, Congress passes laws. Oops.
"I do not rely upon "international law" to assess our immigration policy..."
Concern-trolling at it's peak!
Exactly. He had asylum in Brazil as you said. There is no concern to then allow him asylum in the US.
Entering through the Darien gap also highlights that he knew he didn't have a legitimate right to enter the country.
Why aren't neighboring nations with similar cultures taking on all these 3rd world refugees? That the US and Europe are expected to take them reveals the invasion for what it is.
I can understand a program for Afghan contractors with the US but if he was just part of the army, no. Also, if he was part of such a program then he could have applied from Brasil because that's relatively safe from the Taliban. Overall this just sounds like benefit shopping unless there are further details.
Correct, Bush/Cheney/Hastert never even considered a SIV program because they knew they could accidentally admit a Muzzy terrorist. And sure enough in September 2020 Trump “accidentally” admitted a Muzzy terrorist initial the cuntry intent on assassinating Bush! Oops!
Closest *safe* country is where you seek asylum. Meaning all the people coming from south of Mexico looking for asylum could stay in Mexico.
Afghanis traveling through SA could stay in SA.
Tough titties.
Dissatisfied with the treatment they received in Iran, the family applied for humanitarian visas to Brazil and relocated.
Muslims never are satisfied in Muslim countries.
This is ludicrous. The guy already traveled to Iran, Brazil, Panama, Mexico, and dozens of other countries in between who are parties to the UN Refugee Convention and could have taken his asylum claim. This is not someone truly fleeing for his life. This is a textbook example of someone who is asylum shopping and taking advantage of the system.
Well, gee, then maybe he should have stayed in Brazil??
Maybe he doesn't have to be deported to Afghanistan, but instead to one of the many countries he passed through on his way here.
Yup send him back to Brazil where he was accepted on an asylum claim.
What about the Cuban baseball players that don’t want asylum in America because they would be forced to enter the MLB draft which entitles them to less money than being an international free agent??
The five criteria for being granted asylum are listed in my post above. Overcrowded communal living does not appear on the list.
What about being a pussy?? Like all of the Cubans like Rubio’s parents that refused to take up arms to fight Castro and a handful of other clowns that took over their cuntry??
Explain why this guy had to traverse the Darien gap?
And apparently on foot.
It’s a day that ends in Y.
UNREAL. Marc Jacques, the father of prominent trans athlete Maelle Jacques who invaded girls’ sports, was arrested a SECOND TIME for possession of child p*rnpgraphy.
Marc was originally convicted of distributing child p*rn in 2024 and sentenced to 60 months in prison. However, he temporarily avoided jail by claiming he needed time to figure out custody of his children.
During that time, he was arrested AGAIN after investigators discovered he was still accessing child p*rn.
This just keeps getting worse and worse.
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1993430106484638063
Trump ended that you lying piece of shit!! I’m fine with the Trump recession and expensive energy and more inflation and more abortions and huge deficits and caving to Russia and forcing Netanyahu to release 1900 Hamas terrorists all of which Trump is responsible for…because Trump finally got dudes with smelly hairy balls out of girls sports!! Promises made and one promise kept!!
America's "good war" continues in its excellence.
You can’t quit Dick!
>Given that Dadfar "is in legitimate status," Sharma-Crawford says that she is "hopeful" that the court will rule in Dadfar's favor, either releasing him or ordering a bond hearing.
I do not understand what you are saying. Dude's 'legitimate status' was revoked. Thus he was picked up. You keep talking about 'hearings' - 9/10 people Reason say 'did not have a hearing' end up, by Reason's own admission, ignored their hearings.
He claimed asylum after already being granted safe asylum countries. His claim is invalid.
Boo fucking hoo. STFU.
Remember when you cried over Elian Gonzalez being sent back to his father?? You were upset that Hastert and Foley and Epstein weren’t going to get to diddle him and keep him as a sex slave…sort of weird to be concerned about pedos but whatevs!
According to Dadfar, he was on the phone with his brother at a weigh station in Indiana when masked ICE agents signaled him to end the call.
LMGTFY: "cell phone use while driving in Indiana"
It's been a while since I held a CDL in Indiana (before cell phones) but, presumably since he's at a weigh station:
LMGTFY: "cell phone use while driving in Indiana CDL"
So awaiting asylum a claim *and*, by admission, breaking state and federal law.
Fuck you and your enhanced rights for non-citizens.
I wonder how proficient he is at reading English and knowing the meaning of US traffic signs?
Just to clarify the rules. Using a handheld device while driving is a moving violation but it's legal to use a hands free Bluetooth. If you ever walk around a truck stop you'll see pretty much every driver is wearing one. And trucks driving through scales either get a green light or red light at the scale house. If it's red you're told to park in back where typically a cop will do some sort of inspection. Once the truck is parked you can use a hand held phone. I suspect that ICE was already tracking this guy and told the scale operators to send him around back. This wasn't random enforcement. I drove a semi for 15 years and passed through scales every day. Never saw immigration cops. The English Language Proficiency tests and all other enforcement are handled by state cops. Sounds to me like this guy was already on the radar.
Yeah. Had my CDL before The Patriot Act. My experience was all driving tender and tanker trucks in, out, and around fields.
I assumed there was a given amount of leeway regarding hands free, that said, when local cops or the Federales have to tell you to hang up the phone, that's not a good start, even on foot.
ICE "signaled" and not *told* to him to end the call? The whole thing sounds dodgy as fuck from a Reason-reporting perspective. Like it's between easily possible and likely he was breaking law, but it's easier just to deport him, which ICE was there to do anyway.
FFS, just ring the doorbell and ask, "May I come in?"
If you have to sneak through jungles, wade through dead bodies, and carry your kids on your shoulders over deathly rivers you are doing it all wrong.
Literally not one single actual American gives a flying fig about these stupid sob stories you tell about these people. Punt the illegals. Get them out or put them in jail. Nobody cares which. Get them off our streets and out of our communities. We can talk about folks like Dadfar after we clean house.
Not before.
False. About half the country has humanity and does care. The rest are MAGAs.
I think you mean that you're clown world and you're nine kinds of pissed that nobody listens to you anymore.
We're kicking them out, Molly. Get over it.
What does someone in China know about American law?
"According to Dadfar"
And with this, I stopped reading.
Quit lying. You don't need an excuse to not read the article - we know you never do.
Most of us don't. You're the weirdo if you do.
I didn’t read your comment.
On this site, I read until the first asinine and illogical statement.
It usually takes within 2 paragraphs.
This article may need to go down in the annals of: "this didn't age well." Even milk is still good after only three days.
Seriously. I was gobsmacked at how much I underestimated the military's low regard for the AMA and how much they resented they were forced to endure/ignore their absolutely uncivilized inhuman nature of the terps they were forced to pretend were "American allies." That's how pervasive the left-wing media is. A pederast culture defended as an "ally" after literally hundreds, thousands of stories from boots on the ground telling the same exact thing they heard from them:
"Women are for babies, boys are for pleasure."
If that statement - which I read hundreds of times over dozens of sources from service members who claim to have seen it or had it told straight from AMA mouths, which would require orchestration so precise that it defies belief - is even a little bit true I'm inclined to say that we need to wipe those pederasts off the face of the earth.
Those are not "American allies." America does not "ally" with that. Ever.
This is the same problem we have in Minnesota. "American Somalia" is an oxymoron. They are diametrically opposed in every single way you can possibly think of. There is not one single Somali - or Afghan (or Pakistani, or Haitian) - that has a place in America. The cultural divide is too great and they are far too committed to it.