Three Mile Island Can Restart Without Subsidies. The Federal Government Is Giving It $1 Billion Anyway.
Bringing the defunct power plant back online is a good thing. The government's involvement is not.
The site of America's most notorious nuclear energy incident will soon provide electricity to power Big Tech's AI ambitions. On Tuesday, the Energy Department announced that it will loan the Crane Clean Energy Center, formerly known as Three Mile Island (TMI) Nuclear Generating Station, $1 billion to restart operations of the power plant in Middletown, Pennsylvania.
Kickstarting America's nuclear energy sector has been a priority of the Trump administration and Energy Secretary Chris Wright. In May, President Donald Trump signed a series of executive orders to galvanize the industry, and Wright, who has targeted wasteful spending and slashed billions of dollars of Joe Biden-era green energy projects, has remained bullish about the need for the federal government to support nuclear power.
TMI is the home of America's sole nuclear energy accident. In 1979, TMI Unit 2 suffered a partial meltdown after a malfunction of its cooling mechanism. Even though the incident didn't cause any deaths or demonstrable health effects, it stoked fears about nuclear energy in the U.S. and contributed to the decline of America's nuclear power sector. The Pennsylvania legislature voted to close TMI's remaining reactor in 2019.
In 2024, Constellation Energy announced that it would reopen the site to provide power to Microsoft data centers under a 20-year power purchase agreement. TMI is expected to begin generating power again by 2027.
The Energy Department's $1 billion loan to Constellation will cover "the majority to [sic] the project's estimated cost of $1.6 billion," CNBC reported. Constellation, which operates the nation's largest fleet of nuclear energy, will receive the first installment of the loan in the first quarter of 2026.
At its face, the $1 billion loan is one of Trump's less egregious uses of public dollars for the energy sector; only weeks ago, he agreed to pump $80 billion into the build-out of Westinghouse Electric Company nuclear reactors in exchange for a possible equity stake in the company. But any instance of the federal government subsidizing an energy project, especially with the public holding over $30 trillion in debt, is a poor use of resources.
The timing of this loan makes the investment all the more questionable. As CNBC reports, "When asked why Constellation was receiving the loan now," an Energy Department official said, "Constellation could have completed the project without help from the Energy Department. But the loan will help make electricity cheaper for consumers on the grid operated by PJM Interconnection, which serves more than 65 million people across 13 states."
Wanting to reduce electricity rates may be a worthwhile goal—energy costs are outpacing inflation and are rising faster in some states with a higher concentration of data centers—but pouring public money into restarting nuclear power plants is not the best way to achieve this. After all, reckless spending is what has caused inflation to climb in recent years, and the government's bureaucratic and burdensome permitting system has made it harder and more expensive to build the energy infrastructure that can alleviate energy prices. Trump's trade war, meanwhile, is also likely to add to Americans' utility costs.
Unfortunately for ratepayers, the federal government does not seem ready to reduce its role in energy markets. The Trump administration has directed millions of dollars toward coal projects, axed renewable energy production, and taken an equity stake in a lithium mining company. It has also continued financing the restart of a decommissioned nuclear power plant in Michigan that received funding under the Biden administration, and, as CNBC reports, it might subsidize another nuclear restart in Iowa.
The restart of TMI and nuclear power's growing popularity could signal that the U.S. is ready for another buildout of the energy source. While this is good news for America's economy and environment, the Energy Department's recent funding announcement seems to indicate that this new era will be accompanied by the same unnecessary government intervention that has plagued the energy sector for decades.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
The article keeps calling this a loan. Asuming that's true and assuming that it's not wildly below market rates or terms, how is this a problem?
Granted, we probably shouldn't be making loans with money we borrowed from other people - but that's pretty low on the list of government stupidity.
Not my preference, it if they’re paying some interest and fully repay the loan then it’s not a big deal. Plus we desperately need lots of new reactors.
Some folks will have a meltdown over this.
It’s a fusion of many bad ideas.
This could lead to a chain reaction.
That's cher nobyl of you.
Glowing reviews!
I'm liking the energy in this thread.
Yes, people are getting amped up—expect a lot of resistance.
Meanwhile electricity rates will skyrocket around the country until projects like this actually start producing energy.
A bit of the cart before the horse happening with electricity to run the data centers not coming online for 2 or more years after the data centers are operating.
Once these centers are online will they be given priority for the electricity before residences? Or will homes be blacked out while AI regurgitates fake news from NYTimes and Wiki?
Blacking out homes would lead to civil unrest. Which might be a plus from the point of view of the elites.
Restarting a nuclear reactor that has been shut down is a royal pain in the ass. They have no licensed Reactor Operators, most of the staff have moved on to other jobs, who knows what the condition of their simulator is, the bulk of the required maintenance checks have not been done, procedures need updating, the 50.59s will be awful, and the NRC might require certain upgrades in order to issue them a license.
Sounds like you should apply for the Project Manager's job since it may be you are the only one in the country who has identified the restart challenges .
I feel certain Molly is the only person that thought of the potential difficulties.
Many have thought about the problem, few have actual experience bringing a reactor back online, I am one of those few.
LOL
Hahahaahahaaha!!!!!!!!
Not a fucking chance,
Hahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!
The "reactor" (SIC) she's referring to is herself, and when she says "going online" she's talking about watching TikTok and using social media.
Given that Molly is Tony, i thought it might be a euphemism or a bathhouse anal gangbang.
Hell no. I did it once, I don't want that headache again.
LOL 2
A billion here and a billion there...........Oh, never mind.
Hmm, data centers sent out into space to feed on the permanent solar power outside the shado of the earth. I don't think we should use so much power for so little AI return.
Microsoft needs the billion or something... Oh and incidently the debt clock shows 38 trillion in the red, oh well.
“We’re talking trillions. When the numbers are this big they’re just pretend.”—Kate McKinnon
https://youtu.be/CPDr9wGNEfg?si=TWlrNajPGmse7a2T&t=266
"Microsoft needs the billion or something..."
Reporting in as a TDS-addled lying pile of shit, I see. You should have read the article, asshole.
TMI proved the safety of nuclear power. The operators did everything possible wrong and still didn't have a major radiation release. The Liberal Socialist Environmental wackos hyped this up to sow fear in the public. It was just bad timing that the movie "The China Syndrome" happened to open at about the same time. By the way I lived with in 400 feet of four nuclear reactors off and on for over four years.
"TMI proved the safety of nuclear power. The operators did everything possible wrong and still didn't have a major radiation release."
Close, but not quite. The Soviets managed to do worse, but even there the death toll was minimal compared to other energy converters:
"The most notable nuclear accident in any country was the Chernobyl Fallout disaster that occurred in the Ukraine SSR in 1986. This nuclear accident killed about 30 people directly and is estimated will lead to an additional 4,000 cancer-related deaths due to radiation exposure." (That last number is based on some horse-back "guesses" never proven to be anywhere close to accurate; lefty bullshit)
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/nuclear-accidents-by-country
Also:
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/charted-safest-and-deadliest-energy-sources/
"The Federal Government Is Giving It $1 Billion Anyway."
"...The Energy Department's $1 billion loan to Constellation..."
One of these is not the same as the other. Is honesty too much to ask?