Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Supreme Court

The Forgotten Classical Liberal Who Fought Jim Crow and Championed Immigration

Remembering the legacy of a principled legal activist.

Damon Root | 11.18.2025 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
11-17-25-v1-a | Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Matt Wade | Wikimedia Commons
(Illustration: Eddie Marshall | Matt Wade | Wikimedia Commons)

In the early months of 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two cases that might not initially appear to share anything in common.

In Tyson and Brother v. Banton, the Supreme Court struck down a New York law forbidding the resale of theater tickets "at a price in excess of fifty cents in advance of the price printed on the face of such ticket." "If it be within the legitimate authority of government to fix maximum charges for admission to theaters," observed the Court, "it is hard to see where the limit of power in respect to price-fixing is to be drawn."

Then, a week later, in Nixon v. Herndon, the Supreme Court struck down a Texas law forbidding African Americans from voting in the state's Democratic primary elections. "It is too clear for extended argument," the Court declared, "that color cannot be made the basis of a statutory classification affecting the right set up in this case."

So, can you guess the connection between the two cases?

You’re reading Injustice System from Damon Root and Reason. Get more of Damon’s commentary on constitutional law and American history.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

You may be forgiven if the name Louis Marshall did not immediately spring to mind. A mostly forgotten figure today, Marshall (1856–1929) was a prominent lawyer and activist who argued and won a series of significant legal victories during the Progressive Era, including the two SCOTUS cases described above.

Marshall was a leading reformer during the Progressive Era, but he was no Progressive. Rather, he was a classical liberal. He championed property rights and economic liberty in regulatory cases while championing the rights of racial, ethnic, and religious minorities in civil rights cases.

That's the link between the New York price-fixing case and the Texas all-white primaries case. Marshall's distinctively individualist fingerprints are to be found all over both of them.

"There must be a limit to the so-called police power," Marshall wrote in a 1923 letter, referring to the regulatory power of state officials. "What right has the Legislature to say to me how much or how little I may receive for that which belongs to me—my labor." In other words, Marshall subscribed to the school of constitutional thought represented by the Supreme Court's 1905 decision in Lochner v. New York, which struck down an economic regulation for violating the individual right to liberty of contract.

"You will be interested to know that the Supreme Court of the United States yesterday handed down its decision in Nixon v. Herndon," Marshall wrote to another correspondent a few years later. The decision "was unanimous," he noted with pride, and it "followed my brief very closely." He added: "The decision is regarded as a most important pronouncement and will have a wide-reaching effect." Marshall was right about that. Nixon v. Herndon would stand at the foundation of a line of cases that ultimately destroyed the racist system of all-white primary elections.

Marshall also played an important role in the early success of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). In 1917, Marshall was part of the winning legal team behind Buchanan v. Warley, in which the Supreme Court struck down a Jim Crow residential segregation law for violating the property rights of black and white Americans. Marshall's fellow classical liberal, the great libertarian lawyer Moorfield Storey, spearheaded that case in his official capacity as president of the NAACP.

The same principles of liberty and equality also guided Marshall's stance on immigration. "This is a country of immigrants," he once declared. "I say that it is not true Americanism and it is not right or just that we shall bar the doors of opportunity against" those immigrants then arriving on U.S. shores.

The child of German-Jewish immigrants himself, Marshall was especially outraged by the rising anti-immigrant sentiments of the Progressive period. Testifying before Congress in 1924, for example, he denounced as both anti-Semitic and anti-Catholic the soon-to-be-passed National Origins Quota Act, which severely restricted all immigration from southern and eastern Europe.

"One would say, having recently read the proclamation of the Imperial Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan," Marshall testified, "that the ideas which underlie its theory of Government in the United States find an echo in this legislation, because the people who are to be admitted are white, largely Protestant, and are of so-called Anglo-Saxon stock, while those who are to be excluded are not Protestants and are not Anglo-Saxon, although they are white." Despite the concerted opposition of Marshall and others, however, that odious measure cleared Congress and was signed into law by President Calvin Coolidge.

As a true believer in the fundamentals of classical liberalism, Louis Marshall fought with equal fervor on behalf of economic liberty, civil rights, and the rights of immigrants. His principled impact on American law deserves to be better remembered today.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Declassified Documents Detail the FBI's Surveillance of a Libertarian Sci-Fi Author

Damon Root is a senior editor at Reason and the author of A Glorious Liberty: Frederick Douglass and the Fight for an Antislavery Constitution (Potomac Books). His next book, Emancipation War: The Fall of Slavery and the Coming of the Thirteenth Amendment (Potomac Books), will be published in June 2026.

Supreme CourtHistoryConstitutionLaw & GovernmentCivil LibertiesRace
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (25)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   2 months ago

    Fighting the Democratic Party’s present day Jim Crow might get you assassinated.

    1. SQRLSY   2 months ago

      "Present day Jim Crow" belongs to the Trumpista Wings of the RePoopLicKKKunt Party, SNOT to the Demon-Craps!!!

      According to Dear Orange Leader, Bleeder of the peons, ONLY the votes of those favoring Dear Orange Leader are legitimate! All other votes belong to "Jim Crow" and are illegal!!!

      https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/24/politics/trump-election-warnings-leaving-office/index.html
      A list of the times Trump has said he won’t accept the election results or leave office if he loses.

      Essential heart and core of the LIE by Trump: “ANY election results not confirming MEEE as Your Emperor, MUST be fraudulent!”
      September 13 rally: “The Democrats are trying to rig this election because that’s the only way they’re going to win,” he said.

      Trump’s constant re-telling and supporting the Big Lie (any election not electing Trump is “stolen”) set up the environment for this (insurrection riot) to happen. He shares the blame. Boys will be boys? Insurrectionists will be insurrectionists, trumpanzees gone apeshit will be trumpanzees gone apeshit, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Trump was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?

      It really should immediately make us think of Krystallnacht. Shitler and the NAZIs set up for this by cuntstantly blaming Jews for all things bad. Jew-haters will be Jew-haters, so let’s forgive and forget? Poor Shitler was misunderstood? Does that sound good and right and true?

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        ⣿⣿⣿⠋⠁⠀⠀⠉⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⡇⠀DEMS⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠶⠖⠿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⡿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⡿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⡟⠁⠀⠀⣶⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣿⡿⠟⠛⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣦⠀⠀⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣤⣄⣀⣀⣤⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢠⠖⠢⡀⣿⣿⠟⠉⠉⠙⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠈⢢⠀⠙⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠑⡄⠀⣠⡀SSqrlsy ⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠙⢿⣿⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣧⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢀⣿⣿⣿⡿⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⠴⠾⠿⠿⣿
        ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⣸⣿⣿⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸

        1. charliehall   2 months ago

          Your use of pornography proves that you have neither facts nor logic to contribute.

      2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

        POOP! SNOT!!!

        Haha, I’m so funny!

  2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    African Americans from voting in the state's Democratic primary elections.

    All about that race, about the race..

    Since the 1800s.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      In the 2024 Democratic Party potus primary, no African American vote was accepted.

    2. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

      tHe pARtIes sWiTchED!

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        They kind of did when the national socialists became the democrats. They are trying to rebrand again by using “social democrats.”

  3. JohnZ   2 months ago

    Today's politicians get the most votes from those whom he or she promises the most welfare.
    Whether it's corporate welfare or social welfare.
    Don't forget the poor illegal aliens who snuck into the country to get their share of the welfare booty.

  4. Rick James   2 months ago

    The same principles of liberty and equality also guided Marshall's stance on immigration. "This is a country of immigrants," he once declared. "I say that it is not true Americanism and it is not right or just that we shall bar the doors of opportunity against" those immigrants then arriving on U.S. shores.

    What was his 1927 definition of "opportunity"?

  5. Rick James   2 months ago

    "that color cannot be made the basis of a statutory classification affecting the right set up in this case."

    Oh how times have changed.

  6. sarcasmic   2 months ago

    He championed property rights and economic liberty in regulatory cases while championing the rights of racial, ethnic, and religious minorities in civil rights cases.

    In other words he would have been completely opposed to Trump's agenda, making him a hardcore leftist.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      You spilled your TDS again.

  7. LIBtranslator   2 months ago

    That was one campaign after the Klanbake contentions where the Dems could not press home a vote to condemn the Klan, and 6 and 5 yrs after the Tulsa and Herrin massacres. Texas meanwhile is becoming more and more the Gilead it was back then. The MAGA slogan is itself reverse-engineered from Ole Miss honkie students draping a "Black America Will Lose Its Greatness" when George Goblin Wallace was physically blocking black student enrollment.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      As opposed to the Republicans, who wouldn't even bring up the Klan at their convention, and elected Klan leaders as Governors of Indiana and Colorado.

  8. Roberta   2 months ago

    ...

    Nixon v. Herndon would stand at the foundation of a line of cases that ultimately destroyed the racist system of all-white primary elections.

    But my understanding is that it did so by annexing political parties to government, or at least by saying government could construe the function of political parties as so governmental that their regulation as arms of government was justified. The basic idea is that political party business is how (general) elections are ultimately conducted, and so that government can and should adopt rules as to party conduct.

    It's not that big a step from there to say that political advertising is a function of government, at least insofar as affecting items on the ballot. Can it be far from there to regulating public discussion of issues of public policy?

    1. Roberta   2 months ago

      My mistake. It was later cases — Nixon v. Condon and Smith v. Allwright that had that effect.

      To this day we have sometimes clashing lines of jurisprudence that say, on one hand, that political parties are private entities entitled to make their own rules, and on the other, that parties are performing election functions that government has delegated to them and to that extent may be regulated as per election law.

      1. charliehall   2 months ago

        When the State is running a Party's primary election, it gets to pick the tunes.

  9. Chip Watkins   2 months ago

    It seems as if the Tyson and Brother case should be the basis for striking down rent control and the new, anti-scalping law proposed for D.C.

    1. charliehall   2 months ago

      Secondary markets for tickets to events are a real thing now thanks to the internet. The appropriate regulation is to prohibit fraud, not price.

      Rent controls are extremely important during wartime emergencies. The US might have lost WW2 without them as the needed factory workers in the booming arms factories could not have lived anywhere near the factories. The resulting labor shortage would have severely crippled the military. That actually did happen in WW1 in NYC but the war ended before it had a crippling effect. The first rent control laws were enacted shortly after the war but were allowed to expire in 1929 because the zoning laws at that time were more about fresh air than about artificially inflating housing values.

      Rent control was enacted during WW2 and incredibly those laws are still in effect for tenants who have lived in a pre 1947 apartment since 1971. Unfortunately the city adopted a Restrict The Supply zoning law in 1961, and just as the MAGA idiots don't believe that tariffs raise prices, the Progressives then and now don't believe that government supply restrictions raise prices -- they just bash landlords the way MAGA bashes immigrants. The response, however, wasn't to relax the zoning laws but to impose rent controls on almost every apartment in NYC -- and in over four dozen other jurisdictions in the state! The Affordability Crisis was predictable and preventable.

  10. AT   2 months ago

    "Championing immigration" is not the same thing as supporting criminal alien border jumpers coming in by the millions.

    2025 Conservatives champion immigration - because they understand what it's supposed to be and how it's supposed to work. They welcome the best, and hope to make them better by sharing superior values and encouraging assimilation to them.

    2025 Liberals, progressives, libertarians, democratic socialists, marxists, communists, Islam, and the Sino-Russian alliance champion the illegal border jumping because it serves their shared goal: destroying America and the values which make it superior to any other nation that has ever existed in all of human history.

  11. charliehall   2 months ago

    The racism of early 20th century progressives has received little attention beyond the obvious case of Woodrow Wilson. They ignore Theodore Roosevelt's attitudes towards indigenous peoples. The poll tax had been repealed in Virginia in 1882 but progressives led by Andrew Jackson Montague and Carter Glass brought it back in 1902.

  12. charliehall   2 months ago

    Another example was the One Drop Rule. Harry Byrd, correctly remembered as a racist today because of his loud opposition to ending the segregated school systems in Virginia (one person who opposed him was Richmond School Board Chairman Lewis Powell, later a Supreme Court Justice), didn't like those "Racial Integrity" laws. The final version of the law was written by James Price, the only Progressive Governor in Virginia since 1922.

    https://encyclopediavirginia.org/entries/racial-integrity-laws-1924-1930/

  13. charliehall   2 months ago

    Free markets are the enemy of bigotry. The creation of Multiple Listing Real Estate services made it next to impossible to discriminate in home sales.

    Greed can also he look. Harry Helmsley integrated some of the apartment complexes he owned because he cared about the color of your money not the color of your skin.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How the FCC Became the Speech Police

Jacob Sullum | From the February/March 2026 issue

Why Can't New York Get Rid of 2-Person Subway Crews?

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 1.17.2026 7:00 AM

ICE Agents Flouted DHS Policies That Could Have Prevented Renee Good's Death

Jacob Sullum | 1.16.2026 4:15 PM

Video Shows Feds Shooting ICE Protester With Nonlethal Round at Point-Blank Range, Blinding Him in One Eye

Autumn Billings | 1.16.2026 3:51 PM

Do Cellphones Cause Cancer? RFK Jr.'s HHS Is Suppressing FDA Data Confirming Cellphone Safety.

Ronald Bailey | 1.16.2026 3:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks