Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Print Subscription
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Reason Roundup

Artificially Inflated?

Plus: Ted Cruz eyes 2028, Nicolás Maduro imagines, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 11.18.2025 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
An image generated using the prompt, “Gutenberg’s printing press incorporating artificial intelligence as an etching." | Illustration: Joanna Andreasson/Midjourney
An image generated using the prompt, “Gutenberg’s printing press incorporating artificial intelligence as an etching." (Illustration: Joanna Andreasson/Midjourney)

What's going on in Silicon Valley? Revenue is looking good almost across the board. Advancements in artificial intelligence—and the infrastructure that supports it—are surging. But layoffs also keep happening. Is this the new paradigm the sector must adjust to?

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

"Technology firms have announced more than 141,000 job cuts so far this year, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a 17 percent increase from the same period last year," reports The Washington Post. "In the last two years, the tech workforce has shrunk nationwide by about 3 percent a year, with California posting a much steeper 19 percent drop, according to data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics."

Per-employee productivity, possibly enhanced by AI, is on the rise; firms are able to easily make do with less headcount. So it tracks that "the overall level of tech employment will be under pressure," Mark Zandi, Moody's chief economist, tells The Washington Post. Of course it will be: This is what efficiency advances look like.

"According to a project from economist Ezra Karger aiming to predict the progress of AI, more than 18 percent of American work hours will be AI-assisted by 2030," writes Niall Ferguson for The Free Press. "Ten years later, AI will be as important to this century as electricity or the car were to the previous one."

"AI—or rather the promise of AI—is now the principal driver of both the U.S. economy and the stock market," continues Ferguson. "Between a sixth and two-fifths of the rise in gross domestic product over the past year is attributable to investments in computer and communications equipment, including chips, data centers, grid upgrades, and AI software."

Some, like economist/writer Noah Smith, theorize that it's the AI boom that's canceling out the economic blow that would otherwise be dealt to the U.S. economy by tariffs. "AI companies have accounted for 80 per cent of the gains in US stocks so far in 2025," writes Financial Times' Ruchir Sharma. Smith adds that "more than a fifth of the entire S&P 500 market cap is now just three companies—Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple—two of which are basically big bets on AI."

It's possible these bets don't yield as much as investors expect, at which point we're in for a very rude awakening. It's possible that the productivity gains from AI result in even worse worker displacement than we're expecting, and the total erasure of a lot of entry-level positions. But it's also possible that the AI boom serves as a means of enabling greater worker productivity, and softens the pain that would otherwise have been felt during these weird economic times.

As for whether or not AI is a bubble, some—like Tyler Cowen—take the tack that bubbles get too bad of a rep: "A lot of so-called bubbles pay off in the long run" writes Cowen for The Free Press (a theory also advanced by Byrne Hobart).

OpenAI, for example, might have an inflated valuation. But "Nvidia is often considered a bellwether AI stock" since so much of its "revenue comes from selling graphics processing units to power advanced AI systems, meaning that its success gives investors insight into the health of the sector overall," writes Cowen. "Currently, Nvidia's stock-price-to-earnings ratio is in the 54 to 55 range, roughly twice the typical market average. That means the market expects great things from this stock. Those projections may or may not be validated, but it's hard to conclude they're entirely divorced from reality." Cowen notes that many of these tech companies have invested their earnings in AI projects, not assuming tons of debt, meaning they're even less likely to incur a sudden crash.


Scenes from New York: Yep.

This was always the insoluble problem for the "abundance Left": there is zero appetite for this politics within the Democratic Party, and they will dutifully vote for a mayor who wants to open government grocery stores and "seize the means of production"—pure anti-abundance. https://t.co/ZfTgmqeawj

— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@christopherrufo) November 17, 2025

 


QUICK HITS

  • How recycling car batteries leads to whole towns in Nigeria being lead-poisoned.
  • "Not long after Covid ended, a tenant in one of my Manhattan buildings died. He was an elderly Italian immigrant who lived alone in a small studio near Gramercy for decades," writes Matt Miller for The Free Press. "Normally, it doesn't take too long for landlords like me to renovate an empty apartment and list it on StreetEasy so that new people can move in and start the next chapter of their lives. But since this particular apartment is rent-stabilized, laws that were passed in 2019 essentially prevent me from doing anything with it except shutting the door and keeping it empty. Strict limits on rent increases under the 2019 laws have left an estimated 50,000 apartments like this one vacant across the city. Because the restrictions on what landlords can charge for these apartments often don't even cover the costs of maintaining them, they become ghosts. It's like they don't exist at all."
  • Do you feel the Cruzmentum?

SCOOP: Sen. Ted Cruz is laying the groundwork for a 2028 presidential bid by leaning into his feud with Tucker Carlson.

He is putting himself on a collision course with VP Vance, a Carlson ally widely seen as the 2028 GOP frontrunner. https://t.co/a8tIAYWtxW

— Axios (@axios) November 17, 2025

  • "Rio Tinto Group is imposing surcharges on aluminum shipments it sells to the US, a move that threatens to further disrupt a North American market already roiled by import tariffs that are driving up costs for consumers," reports Bloomberg. "The Anglo-Australian mining giant is including the extra charge on aluminum orders delivered to the US citing low inventories, as demand starts to outstrip available supply, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter."
  • Abolish public sector unions:

https://twitter.com/EsotericCD/status/1990587335675977824

  • As if we needed more reasons to hate the man:

Venezuela's President Nicolás Maduro breaks into singing John Lennon's 'Imagine' as he talks about US tensions. pic.twitter.com/R270tpM5AF

— The Associated Press (@AP) November 16, 2025

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Forgotten Classical Liberal Who Fought Jim Crow and Championed Immigration

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Reason RoundupPoliticsArtificial IntelligenceSilicon ValleyTed Cruz
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (351)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   2 months ago

    Illegal Alien Rapefugee Terrorist Trucker

    It's bad enough that untold thousands of illegal aliens who can't speak or read basic English hop into 18-wheelers and drive on America's highways — in a "what could possibly go wrong?" sense. 

    But it's a whole other ballgame when a criminal illegal alien from Uzbekistan with terrorist ties pilots a semi on our roads. Did I mention that the illegal, who was recently arrested by ICE, was previously released by the Biden administration? Yeah.

    https://redstate.com/mike_miller/2025/11/17/here-we-go-again-ice-arrests-uzbek-illegal-alien-trucker-accused-of-terrorism-ties-n2196277

    Fuck Joe Biden

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Fuck Joe Biden

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      sarcasmic 3 years ago
      Flag Comment
      Mute User
      What about the blind hatred for Biden in these comments? Seems like a majority of the people here start the day with the "Fuck Joe Biden" prayer. Why is that warranted while anyone who says "Boo" about Trump is accused of Trump Derangement Syndrome?

    3. DesigNate   2 months ago

      Fuck who ever puppeteered Joe Biden.

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Uzbeks are the weak link in the great chain of socialism.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4nk5mSz_2s

  2. tracerv   2 months ago

    I've like Lennon's music but Imagine has always made me wretch.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      Wonder if British artists will remake his holiday song:

      Happy Ramadan (Jihad is Over)

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        his holiday song

        The absolute worst song on a Christmas playlist.

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          A little Boney M to get folks in the spirit:

          https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cmm1gt_2SkQ&pp=

        2. MK Ultra   2 months ago

          "It's a Bad Brains Christmas, Charlie Brown."

          https://youtu.be/r326c3DewuE?si=CMkf-6jU_x_3b_gD

          1. Dillinger   2 months ago

            a viewing of this should be mandatory for something ...

        3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Agreed. Not much of a fan of that song.

        4. DesigNate   2 months ago

          As much as I hate that fucking song, it does not beat out Band Aid’s “Do They Know It’s Christmas” for the worst Christmas song.

          Talk about paternalism and the soft bigotry of retarded leftists.

          1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

            A close 2nd, but those morons whispering "Happy Christmas" is the worst.

    2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      Because he was a phoney?

      And where do the ducks go in the winter? I'm guessing it's not Haiti.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Perhaps Mark David Chapman thought that John Lennon debated college students.

      2. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        I'm guessing it's not Haiti.

        Not Springfield, Ohio either.

      3. Weigel's Cock Ring   2 months ago

        This. The real-life Lennon was a complete asshole. One could argue that his shooting was instant karma coming to get him.

        1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

          In what way was he a complete asshole?

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

            Losers hate the talented.

            1. Zeb   2 months ago

              Except the people calling him an asshole are saying he is talented. He was kind of a sad junky later in life and didn't exactly do well in his personal relationships. And while I do appreciate Lennon and a lot of the music he made, I'd say McCartney and Harrison were better singers, Harrison was a better guitarist, McCartney was arguably a better song writer (though I go back and forth on that) and Ringo was a cool dude and a much better drummer than a lot give him credit for.

              1. tracerv   2 months ago

                100% on Ringo. Rain alone should prove he knew what he was doing on the kit. Plus, Caveman and Barbara Bach!!

              2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                I’d say McCartney was a more successful songwriter, especially in getting his material on the charts. Ringo was definitely a damn good drummer. The other three agreed, and what they had to say about Pete Best wasn’t exactly kind.

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  There's a lot on youtube these days about Pete Best and dispelling the rumor he was fired because he was too good looking, but really because he was a sucky drummer. They have back to back tracks with Ringo vs. Pete keeping time.

                  Ringo: A+
                  Pete Best: F

              3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                I'd say McCartney and Harrison were better singers,

                Gotta disagree there. John's the best singer in the group.

                Harrison was a better guitarist,

                No question. George is very underrated (because he played for the song, not to be a guitar God), but John has some good riffs and is always included in the top 10 lists of best rhythm guitarists.

                McCartney was arguably a better song writer

                Blasphemy!

                Ringo was a cool dude and a much better drummer than a lot give him credit for.

                Yes. He's really a great drummer.

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  But Paul was arguably the best all-around musician in the group, very capable on keyboards and guitar (like where the hell did Blackbird come from?), occasional drums and of course bass.

                  And I think a case could be made that the reason the late Beatles stayed relevant and essentially changed the course of rock music was Paul's bass playing. So many songs have a bass sub-melody of a type unknown before Paul. That was often song-changing in some of John's laid-back monotone-ish type songs, like Dear Prudence and Come together.

                  1. tracerv   2 months ago

                    He did the hot guitar on Tax Man as well.

                    1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      The best Beatles guitar solo was performed by Eric Clapton.

                    2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      The best Beatles guitar solo was performed by Eric Clapton.

                      I think a lot would agree, but personally I'd say Harrison on Something is the best Beatles guitar solo.

                    3. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      The best Beatles guitar solo performed by Eric Clapton was performed by Prince.

                    4. DesigNate   2 months ago

                      Holy shit that was amazing. Thanks for the link sarc.

                2. Zeb   2 months ago

                  Well, no accounting for taste. I won't hold it against you if you prefer Lennon on either count. I do quite like Lennon's songs in later Beatles (after it became obvious which Lennon/McCartney songs were whose). It may also be partly my contrarian nature reacting to Lennon's place in popular culture.

                  1. Overt   2 months ago

                    It's noteworthy that by their late career the entire band was getting a LOT of help from very capable producers. By that time, really all you can argue is that ones' tastes and management of a team was better than another.

                    1. Zeb   2 months ago

                      Fair. And that later stuff is really my favorite Beatles (though Phil Spector maybe over did it a bit with the strings on Let It Be).

          2. Weigel's Cock Ring   2 months ago

            His preferred method for dealing with his inner demons was usually punching people, particularly his wife and young kids. This stuff was documented in various biographies a long time ago.

        2. Chumby   2 months ago

          Turns out he was just a jealous guy.

        3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Yeah,
          I LOVE John Lennon's music, especially his Beatles songs and even solo stuff including Imagine. He is probably my all-time favorite artist...but he was a total asshole and another reason I now try to avoid learning anything about the personal lives of musicians I like.

          George Harrison is a better person and maybe the coolest person to ever live thus he's my favorite Beatle and certainly no joke as a musician**...naa naa naa naa...fingers in ears... don't say anything....I don't want to know....**

    3. Zeb   2 months ago

      I like Lennon's music in the Beatles. His solo stuff has never done a lot for me.

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        I leave on Mind Games and Watching the Wheels

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Beautiful Boy is nauseating.

          1. Dillinger   2 months ago

            yes.

          2. Chumby   2 months ago

            Jeffshrike disagrees.

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Lennon was overrated.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Pffffft. Hippies. Lol.

    5. Chumby   2 months ago

      Imagine there’s no trannies,
      It isn’t hard to do.
      Go back some decades
      Barely even a few.
      Imagine all the people,
      Living in reality.

      Imagine there’s no retards,
      With their new axewounds.
      Mental case cosplayers,
      They are stupid buffoons.
      Imagine all the people,
      Living in reality.

      You may say he’s woman,
      And you’re not the only one.
      Someday you’ll join us.
      Tell him cosplaying is done.

  3. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    Strict limits on rent increases under the 2019 laws have left an estimated 50,000 apartments like this one vacant across the city. Because the restrictions on what landlords can charge for these apartments often don't even cover the costs of maintaining them, they become ghosts.

    The new mayor will either force you to rent it or take it away from you.

    1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      Probably just take it from you, then rent it out at a loss. And the loss in profit is eaten by taxes. Subsidized housing.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        And a report yesterday says 40% of rent controlled apartments go to migrants.

        1. HorseConch   2 months ago

          Well, they're only 60% short of their goal as they try to reimagine the city.

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

      He'll take it away from you and force you to fund the maintenance.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Because the restrictions on what landlords can charge for these apartments often don't even cover the costs of maintaining them, they become ghosts. It's like they don't exist at all.

      Economist Gunnar Myrdal stated, “Rent control has in certain Western countries constituted, maybe, the worst example of poor planning by governments lacking courage and vision.” His fellow Swedish economist (and socialist) Assar Lindbeck asserted, “In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing.”

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Can't we just proceed with the bombing instead of screwing around with rent control?

        1. HorseConch   2 months ago

          Bombing leads to rebuilding. Rent control just leads to slow, needless, and irreversible destruction.

          1. Morbo   2 months ago

            Bombing leads to rebuilding.

            Right, like the fire has lead to rebuilding in LA?

            1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

              You might want to pay attention to who is in charge there.

  4. Chumby   2 months ago

    It Is for the Kids

    DEA: Cartels using children to distribute fentanyl in Portland

    https://www.kptv.com/2025/04/22/dea-honduran-cartels-using-children-distribute-fentanyl-portland/

    I sure hope those Portland kids distributing fentanyl for cartels don’t step in any of the many piles of human feces deposited in public spaces throughout the prolapsed rose city.

    1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      Thank you, prohibition.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Thank you democrat open borders.

        1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

          Do better. Be better.

  5. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Leticia James is now investigating conde nasty for firing her allies.

    https://jonathanturley.org/2025/11/14/letitia-james-targets-conde-nast-over-the-firing-of-workers-accused-of-disrupting-workplace/

    I'm sure reason will be all over this.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      the union members demanded to know what the company was doing to stand up to Donald Trump.

      LOL

      1. Nobartium   2 months ago

        The shift of the union workers to Trump is the reason that demonrats will never repeal tariffs.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          And none of the anti tariff whiners here will ever bring them up again. Sarc will even insist he never complained about them.

      2. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Someone should give them a doll so they can point where Donals Trump has hurt them.

      3. HorseConch   2 months ago

        Since when is it a corporation's duty to "stand up to Donald Trump", or whatever the fuck they're asking for?

        1. Marshal   2 months ago

          It's an admission they believe the proper function of media organizations is left wing political advocacy. It's likely even the HR director believes this, he just doesn't believe it overrides business functionality or grants line employees veto power over management decisions.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Letitia James: “ no one is above the law”

      Letitia James: “When powerful people cheat to get better loans, it comes at the expense of hardworking people. Everyday Americans cannot lie to a bank to get a mortgage, and if they did, our government would throw the book at them. There simply cannot be different rules for different people,"

      Letitia James: lies to a bank to get a mortgage...

  6. Chumby   2 months ago

    Bathroom Intruder

    There are literally millions of middle aged men who fit that description!

    https://t.me/two_majors/63230

    The newscaster looks just like the police sketch.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      The look in the woman’s face says it all.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        She looks like she was stuck in a room with Joe Biden.

        Fuck Joe Biden

    2. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Hide ya kids, hide ya wife and hide ya husband, cause they rapin' erybody out here.

    3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Is that real?

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Not sure. No branding. Has happened before:

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_T03S13g31o

  7. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Britain refusing to release data showing link between covid vaccine and increase of excess deaths.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/11/15/government-withholding-data-covid-jab-link-excess-deaths/

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      100% safe and effective with no downsides.

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      It was just a wittle ouchie.

      - Mike Laursen

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        No extinction level deaths - Ronald Bailey

        1. MT-Man   2 months ago

          I thought his view is now it's a turbo cure for cancer.

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            He seems proud of being boosted 9 times.

          2. Eeyore   2 months ago

            You will probably survive your jab - your cancer might not be so lucky.

      2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        You get used to excess deaths.

        1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

          It’s not as traumatic as losing a federal job.

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            Not sure Reason will get used to excess loss of federal jobs.

    3. Eeyore   2 months ago

      I think they said no - because the data might give somebody a sad. They don't want to contribute to the sadness epidemic.

  8. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    This was always the insoluble problem for the "abundance Left":

    The? "A" would be more apt. They always seemed to have many insoluble problems.

  9. Chumby   2 months ago

    Eggciting Find

    Missing Russian imperial Fabergé egg found at a midwest flea market.

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-OlvFph--K4&pp=

    The man who bought it at the flea market was not tsarry after it appraised for $30M.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      The seller has egg on his face after that mistake.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      Another sign of inflation in trumps economy

    3. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

      Must’ve been the property of a lady.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        The gift helped fortify the Bond she had with the presenter.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          You had no business bidding for that egg! What would you have done if you'd had been stuck with it?

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            The woke remake of that film will be called:

            Cocktopussy

      2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Are you saying dudes can’t have eggs? Transphobe!

    4. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

      Eggcellent!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f04ULfzkMhY

  10. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Caryma Sa'd - Lawyer + Political Satirist
    @CarymaRules
    Police turn off pro-Canada demonstrator’s speaker as he plays the national anthem ahead of the Palestinian flag-raising at Nathan Phillips Square, citing a prohibition on amplifying devices.

    Nothing prevents a capella singing, however.

    Nov 17, 2025

    https://x.com/CarymaRules/status/1990463993970872439

    1. Moonrocks   2 months ago

      Nationalism is a-okay, just so long as it's Arab nationalism.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        The only bad nationalism is American and Israeli nationalism.

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      Reminds me to look at trading ML to the US in exchange for jeffsarcshrikeKARtony and another woke piece of shit to be named later.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Give them KMW too.

  11. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    The trump assassing Thomas Crooks was a trans furry lover.

    https://nypost.com/2025/11/17/opinion/fbi-secret-service-butchered-the-thomas-crooks-case-and-invited-conspiracies-we-deserve-the-truth/

    1. Weigel's Cock Ring   2 months ago

      It's absolutely fucking amazing that a whistleblower deep within the F.B.I. decided to leak everything they learned about Crooks (clearly without authorization), to the media and the NY Post is the only outlet in rge entire country that decided to go ahead and publish the info.

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      Bluesky must be furryious about this.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        Only that it was revealed, they knew he wasn't making it to the convention this year.

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          The only yiffing for him now will be when his much larger and lonely cellmate wants some companionship.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        They must be having a cow.

      3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        You ever wonder if Jeffy is a furry?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          He'd be a shoe-in for winning the fattest bear contest in Alaska.

    3. A Thinking Mind   2 months ago

      Uhm, the evidence that he's a furry seems a bit lacking. Though he might have had a trans-fixation.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        It doesn't call him a furry. It says he had an attraction to it.

        Muscular furries with female heads.

  12. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Rapefugee who molested 2 women in a taxi let off and allowed to return to work driving taxis.

    https://nypost.com/2025/11/15/us-news/soft-on-crime-manhattan-da-alvin-braggs-office-ignored-cabbie-assault-victim-let-driver-off-easy-she-said/

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      He only lightly molested them and it didn’t last long.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        He never said sorry though, so not sure what to do now.

        1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

          Get used to it?

          #bigcitycharm

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          Were the 2 women drunk?

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

            Did you see what they were wearing?

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      Obscene from New York

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        It was not done to Interfere®™ in an election, so he did not consider it to be a felony.

  13. Nobartium   2 months ago

    A lot of so-called bubbles pay off in the long run

    Only if you invested early (or are wealthy enough to not care).

  14. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Cruzmentum

    Nope, he should have punched Trump in the face for insulting his wife. And then totally allowed Trump to end the sequestration, his greatest legislative achievement.

  15. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

    Some, like economist/writer Noah Smith, theorize that it's the AI boom that's canceling out the economic blow that would otherwise be dealt to the U.S. economy by tariffs. "AI companies have accounted for 80 per cent of the gains in US stocks so far in 2025," writes Financial Times' Ruchir Sharma.

    Lol. What terrible analysis.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      It's possible these bets don't yield as much as investors expect, at which point we're in for a very rude awakening.

      It is already a bubble. OpenAI revenue, not even profit, is 30B a year with minimal cash reserves, yet evaluation is 1T.

      They are participating in investment asset swaps with NVIDIA.

      Early reports from actual users of technical AI in engineering and coding show bad results. Essentially AI writes junior level bug ridden code, cant optimize code, making experienced engineers spend double the time on code reviews and fixing it while removing entry level positions removing development of future engineers. As someone whose team has been looking into these tools we've realized it is utter crap and we would rather develop future engineers who can replace older engineers.

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        AI can not even do math.

        https://www.reddit.com/r/PoeAI/comments/1ooumla/why_does_ai_keep_making_egregious_errors_in/

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

          Was it a female AI? It's been said that math is hard for the fairer sex.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Probably Femputer.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Ruchir Sharma.

      Cheap imported analysis.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        We need yuge tariffs on cheap imported leftist analysis.

    3. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      But "Nvidia is often considered a bellwether AI stock" since so much of its "revenue comes from selling graphics processing units to power advanced AI systems, meaning that its success gives investors insight into the health of the sector overall," writes Cowen.

      Nvidia is literally investing in the companies to buy their cards. This is the same thing that happened during the dot com bubble.

      It shows on a financial line as an investment, but it is essentially an asset loan.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        Oh, like Enron.

      2. Chumby   2 months ago

        When the chips are down, they have to do something.

    4. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      If Twitter can lay off almost 80% of it's workforce and see no issues I have to wonder if this is largely cutting the adult day care jobs alongside some AI efficiency.

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        All of our cuts have been to bloated HR and management here.

        1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          But what will all those bitchy girlbosses do?

          1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

            They all want to leave america anyways.

            1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

              We could send them all to a deserted South Pacific island. Think girlboss version of ‘Lord of the Flies’.

      2. Ron   2 months ago

        this i think the tech companies have been over bloated with woke ideas and more cash than they knew what to do with at times, hiring more people does not always make a company richer, just bigger.

  16. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Esptein files...

    Seems that as soon as the discharge petition was activated, Rep. Tim Burchett put forth a motion that attempted to bring the Epstein Files Transparency Act to the House floor via unanimous consent and that House Democrats refused to agree, thereby blocking his expedited release effort.

    Soon after, Speaker Johnson announced that he would move the bill onto the fast-track, with a vote likely to come within the week.

    rom ‘The Daily Wire’:

    Speaker Mike Johnson said the House will vote on a bill to release all files related to the late financier and convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein next week. Johnson said on Wednesday that a discharge petition to bypass leadership and force a vote on the bill hit the benchmark for needed signatures. He has decided to expedite the vote for the bill, which under current rules could have been delayed until at least early December.

    “As soon as the discharge petition received the 218th signature, we brought it up on unanimous consent, and that would, as you know, make it — would get it through the process immediately. The Democrats shockingly opposed it. It was a staggering level of hypocrisy.”

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Soon: “There appears to be some missing pages in the files”.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Wont stop Kung fu shrike from carrying dem water though.

      1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

        Or watching more child rape videos.

    3. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

      "Files Redacted"

  17. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1990233512587260013

    Andy Ngo

    @MrAndyNgo
    An eight-year-old American girl was killed in Boise, Idaho when she was struck by a truck on Nov. 11. The apprehended driver is a migrant named Elvin Ramos-Caballero. He had an outstanding federal warrant involving U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and has been taken into custody by ICE.

    For months, leftists and Democrats have been rioting and protesting to demand the end of immigration law enforcement. Some have carried out shootings on ICE facilities, including a deadly attack in Dallas. They believe Americans being harmed is worth it to support migrants and open borders.

    1. Chumby   2 months ago

      Did the 8-year old girl debate college students?

    2. Z Crazy   2 months ago

      Simpingfor illegalkind is rooted in anti-white animus.

      I know this because the same people who excuse illegal immigration because whites are not indigeous to North America ALSO support mass migration into Europe where whites ARE indigenous, instead of saying that white Europeans get to gun down invaders en masse.

      They believe in this colonizer-colonizee dynamics. They feel that whites are responsible for all the evil in the world, so they support violent criminals immigrating in and committing crimes against whites, especially sex crimes against white girls.

      They cheered the Colonge Sex Attacks.

      Of course, if little black boys like AJ Wise are killed by illegals, they just consider it collateral damage!

      White Girls Matter!

  18. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

    Imagine the worst song ever.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Peace is such a repugnant idea.

      1. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

        Peace through absolute ideological conformity is repugnant.

      2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

        No, but the song is terrible. Idea vs Execution.

      3. See.More   2 months ago

        Let's review some of the lyrics...

        Imagine there's no countries
        It isn't hard to do
        Nothing to kill or die for

        As if conflict is only about countries and borders. Nah. No one ever fought over access to water, fertile hunting grounds, minerals, or other resources...

        Oh. Wait.

        Imagine no possessions
        I wonder if you can
        No need for greed or hunger

        1.) Fuck off. I'll keep my home, my furniture, my vehicles, my clothes, and etceteras. Thank you very much.

        2.) Sure "no hunger"... riiiiggghhhht.
        (a.) nature alone does not produce enough food resources to feed the entire world population on foraging and hunting/fishing. Agriculture is the only way to adequately feed the world's population, and...
        (b.) unless you've got some Star Trek level of replicator technology, with "no possessions", no one will be farming at agricultural scale. Yay! We're back to subsistence farming... oh. wait. No possessions. Yeah, subsistence farms will be constantly raided.

        So, the first part is also dead. Even without countries, there will be conflict over food resources. Nope. No peace happenin' there.

        Yeah. The song is shit.

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          Pffffft. Hippies. Lol.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          Lennon was a moron, and very much overrated.

  19. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

    The effect of AI on the workforce remains to be seen but it is clear that, like automation before it, will significantly decrease the need for labor. I will be interested to see how this is addressed because a massive jump in unemployment will be socially, economically and politically destabilizing. Hopefully, the effect of AI on employment will be slow enough to allow adjustments. I just not sure it will be slow enough for the amount of adjustment that will be needed.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Replace “AI” with any other technology that arose in the past and your post sounds just as retarded.

      1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

        Most automation and new technology has reduced the need for labor. Increased efficiency is a euphonism for cutting jobs. Show me I am wrong.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Technology, efficiency and job replacement has been advancing for 200 years now, yet the unemployment rate remains pretty stable, waxing and waning with the economy.

          The job I do did not exist even 50 years ago, nor did the technology needed to do it.

          1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

            You know your stance is really stupid when QB can correct you.

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              I'd like to be pissed, but this is another DLAM gem.

              1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                If by "gem" you mean a piece of broken glass in a pile of bloody shit, then I must agree.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

                  Your derangement is really something to behold, Sarc.

                2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                  Sqrsly like vibes for not being sqrsly.

                3. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                  No, it’s not like the shit you took in your pants while passed out drunk last night Sarc.

          2. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

            Most of the advancements in my lifetime have shifted employment from manufacturing jobs to service jobs. Many of those service jobs are now in the sights of AI and the question becomes where does the workforce go next? Your job did not exist 50 years ago, but the bigger question is will it exist 50 years from now?

            1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

              Your job did not exist 50 years ago, but the bigger question is will it exist 50 years from now?

              Wrong question. The correct question is what jobs will exist 50 years from now that do not exist today? Because human wants are infinite. Soon as we satisfy one we dream up another. And then jobs are created to fulfill that want. Eventually those jobs are automated or otherwise made obsolete, freeing human capital to fulfill yet another previously-unimagined human want.

            2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              Many of those service jobs are now in the sights of AI and the question becomes where does the workforce go next

              Hmmm. This is worth thinking about.

            3. See.More   2 months ago

              ... the bigger question is will it exist 50 years from now?

              That is not a bigger question. It is an irrelevant question. The world is dynamic. Things change. Get used to it. Adapt or die.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          Spreadsheets eliminated accountants pounding away on adding machines. The productivity increase eliminated a lot of those jobs. Word processors and photocopiers eliminated typist pools. Chatbots that handle a host of basic front-line problems people call into tech support for (password resets and the like) allow tech support to be more productive by focusing on real problems, but might eliminate front-line support jobs.

          It's hair-splitting semantics to distinguish labor from productivity sometimes. If some tool increases my productivity for certain tasks, it reduces my labor on those tasks. If it increases it enough, it can cost jobs--not necessarily a bad thing.

        3. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          A century ago more than half of the population was farmers. Machines and automation has reduced that number to two percent. That means that at least 48% of the population is unemployed with zero job prospects. Show me I am wrong.

          1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

            Well of course it is not the case that 48% of people are unemployed, but it is true that the transition from agriculture to manufacturing took many years. It is also true that that shift in the population from agriculture work, to manufacturing work, and then to service work came with many social and economic changes. The problem is will AI causes changes faster than the population can absorb.

            1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

              The problem is will AI causes changes faster than the population can absorb.

              They say that every time a new technology comes around. For example the transition from horses to cars, or whale oil to kerosene. Change happens fast, yet people find new jobs. Stop being a Luddite.

              1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

                I'm not a Luddite. AI is coming and no one can not stop it. What I am advocating is planning for the effects AI may have on the labor market. There is is already evidence of what happens when unemployment jumps up. We can look to cities like Detroit and other rust belt cities. We can also look to areas like the West Virginia coal fields to see the impact of high unemployment.

                1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                  Technologies tend to create jobs as well as destroy them.

                  When cars replaced horses they put lots of people out of work.

                  They also created all kinds of jobs that previously didn’t exist.

                  AI will be no different.

                  1. DesigNate   2 months ago

                    You’re much more optimistic on this subject than I am.

                    1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      Why be pessimistic? AI is just another tool that will increase productivity, free human capital, and create new jobs. It's only scary because it's new, and as such people fill the unknowns with their imagination. In time it will be ho-hum, like the Internet or computers or robotics or whatever else got people in an uproar before becoming normal.

                      That's not to say that people won't be hurt. But that always happens. Buggy whip makers went out of business because of cars. They worked hard to gain that skill! Then poof, they're no longer needed. On the other hand we now need people to build cars, maintain them, provide gas, clean them, and so on. And don't forget roads. Jobs were lost and created.

                      The destruction part of creative destruction sucks. But in the long run we all prosper.

            2. Chumby   2 months ago

              Learn to give good blowjobs.

              Sarc’s been engaging in hands-on “job” training for years. It isn’t making him rich, but he earns enough to drink everyday and afford the paltry amount of alimony his ex was able to get the court to impose.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Sarc has his gloryhole territory staked out already. He is now the Ricketty Cricket of the commentariat.

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLnbU7b0Qyk

                This is basically Sarc now.

        4. A Thinking Mind   2 months ago

          Just look at what the automobile did to the horseshoe industry. So many jobs were lost!

          1. See.More   2 months ago

            Just look at what the automobile did to the horseshoe industry. So many jobs were lost!

            Not just the horseshoe industry, but farriers, saddlers, wainwrights, cartwrights, buggy whip makers, et al. Not to mention the hit on demand for horse feed, lumber (to make carts), leather (to make buggy whips, saddles, and other tack), and likely more.

            1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

              Shit shovelers.

              "According to the 89th Annual Report of the Board of Health, nearly 500 tones of horse manure were collected from the streets of New York every day, produced by 62,208 horses living in 1,307 stables. "

              "In New York in 1900, the population of 100,000 horses produced 2.5 million pounds of horse manure per day, which all had to be swept up and disposed of.

              A 1000-pound horse will defecate from 4 to 13 times each day and produce 35 to 50 pounds of wet manure (feces plus urine) daily.

              1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                Under Mamdani, we will return to those days. Minus the horses.

                1. Chumby   2 months ago

                  Portland already has the manure and urine part covered.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Awaiting the Butlerian Jihad.

  20. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    https://x.com/AlphaNews/status/1990257946459086851

    Alpha News
    @AlphaNews
    WATCH: Letters from women in the Shakopee prison are read out loud during a protest against a Minnesota policy allowing men in the state's women's prison

    "This message is directed at Gov. Tim Walz. After allowing men in our safe spaces where we are sent for rehabilitation, you have created an unsafe environment for us. In fact, you created more trauma, more loss of security and our right to be simply safe."

    1. Chupacabra   2 months ago

      The most important women have lady dicks.

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        Transphobic women are the worst.

      2. Chumby   2 months ago

        A lot of women got penises.

        https://tenor.com/view/jeandecay-jean-decay-penis-transgender-gif-10198410

        1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

          In their vaginas?

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      Weird.

  21. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Advancements in artificial intelligence—and the infrastructure that supports it—are surging.

    Skynet eats more coal than all chinamen put together!

    1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      A non sequitur: China's CO2 output is more than the US, Russia, India, the EU, and Japan, combined.

    2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      Not since I went on Zepbound

    3. Chumby   2 months ago

      But 30 minutes later, are they hungry again?

    4. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 months ago

      Well if the FDA would just let Skynet feast on excess human energy while we "enjoy" the simulation; like global warming would be a thing of the past, man.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Technology firms have announced more than 141,000 job cuts so far this year...

    Where has all our DEI gone?

  23. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    — Christopher F. Rufo

    Quoting Rufo??? Persona non grata in polite circles.

  24. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    How recycling car batteries leads to whole towns in Nigeria being lead-poisoned.

    Small price to pay for the prestige of my Prius.

    1. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

      Those are ICE batteries. There one of those in every gas powered car.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Lol. Some people just can’t let a joke be a joke.

        Idiot.

  25. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

    How recycling car batteries leads to whole towns in Nigeria being lead-poisoned.

    Are we blaming the batteries or the sloppy work practices?

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      I'm sure sarc will call this another success of comparative advantage.

    2. Chumby   2 months ago

      Blaming white cis males whose old vehicle batteries poisoned the Nigerians. Just like when an SUV plows itself into a Christmas parade. It was the SUV.

      1. Z Crazy   2 months ago

        Sadly, that doesnt sound like a parody anymore.

      2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        So Tesla is just a conspiracy to get AWFLs to poison Nigerians? Makes as much sense as anything these days.

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          Nah, Lithium batteries for Teslas are mostly poisoning Chinese. I don't think there's much lead in a Tesla.

          1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

            Meh, China has lots of peasants to burn off. So no big deal.

    3. Moderation4ever   2 months ago

      Are the cycling practices sloppy or cheap?

      1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

        Obviously both.

    4. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Are the workers barefoot, or just wearing flip-flops?

  26. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "Abolish public sector unions"

    All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations when applied to public personnel management. The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for administrative officials to represent fully or to bind the employer in mutual discussions with Government employee organizations. The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives in Congress.

    Franklin Delano Roosevelt, like the overwhelming majority of Americans today, opposed public sector unions.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Far right* FDR

    2. MT-Man   2 months ago

      The state's union here negotiated them the employees the $1 an hour increase the state was already going to give them (so nothing) already but the union leaders took a 40% pay increase. It's amazing people still pay dues to them with that kind of highway robbery, not even getting into the other faults.

  27. Archibald Baal   2 months ago

    "This was always the insoluble problem for the 'abundance Left'"

    The profound misunderstanding of the so-called "abundance-left" is wishful thinking on the part of libertarians. "Yes!" they think. "Some lefties are finally listening to us and coming to their senses! They want to build more and let the market work!" But they don't.

    If you listen to what they actually say when interviewed rather than what you hope they're thinking, they want massive government growth, they just want to remove barriers of all sorts. You imagine they will remove environmental protections, cushy union backroom deals, and stringent permitting requirements, but that is never going to happen in proggie circles. What they will actually do is remove any vague vestiges of protection for property rights against eminent domain so they can seize land more effectively.

    They see the California high speed rail failure not as a massive boondoggle but as a failure to properly steamroll over property rights and municipalities that got in the way. They look to China as an example of someone who is still "building stuff" but carefully elide that the reason China can do this is because the CCP can just take your shit and build on it without you holding them up in litigation for years.

    THAT is what the "abundance-left" wants, not some fantasy you have that they have finally caught market fever.

    The point being... the reason they get along with Mamdani is that he's exactly what they want: bold, big government ideas. They just want to help him get the red tape out of his way. That's the "abundance agenda".

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

      Well said. It's not about protecting individual/private property rights. It's about destroying them.

  28. Moonrocks   2 months ago

    ...they become ghosts. It's like they don't exist at all.

    Sounds like it's ripe for the taking by the government.

    1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Even scooby doo and gang could uncover this mystery.

      1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        It's Old Man Johnson?!

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          And he would have gotten away with it too if it weren’t for those meddling kids.

          1. Ajsloss   2 months ago

            And their damn raccoon dog.

  29. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Nations hit by natural disasters tell ministers at UN climate talks to act"
    [...]
    "Battered by last month’s ferocious *climate-fueled hurricane*, Jamaica joined other small island nations and impoverished countries at Monday’s United Nations climate talks to implore the rest of the world to stop talking and start acting. Their message: Our lives are on the line.
    https://businessmirror.com.ph/2025/11/18/nations-hit-by-natural-disasters-tell-ministers-at-un-climate-talks-to-act/

    Uh, no. You live where hurricanes occur. Go whine somewhere else.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Aren't all hurricanes climate fueled?

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Some are fueled by HAARP devices controlled by a Jewish cabal, right JFree?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

          Chemtrails, chemtrails everywhere!

          /sarc

        2. Minadin   2 months ago

          Space lasers built by the Freemasons and controlled by the Illuminati.

      2. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Yes, they are.

        Does not Jamaica have a king?

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          Peter Tosh forever.

          1. Chumby   2 months ago

            Is the queen’s name Wendy?

          2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

            Actually Toots and the Maytals explained this phenomenon rather well.
            "Pressure drop oh pressure oh yeah pressure gonna drop on you".

            1. Dillinger   2 months ago

              ^^

      3. Zeb   2 months ago

        Every bit of weather, be it hurricanes or nice, mild, sunny days are fueled by climate. It's a complex system where everything affects everything. It's completely silly to try to say that one thing is caused by the current state of the climate and one thing isn't.
        And haven't there been some pretty quiet hurricane seasons in recent years? What caused that?

        1. Chupacabra   2 months ago

          Higher taxes, obviously.

        2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          When it's mild it's weather. When it's intense it's a climate event.

  30. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

    "Klein voted for Mamdani"

    Anyone with half a brain saw Klein's "abundance" jive as nothing more than another Leftist Skinsuit.

    Klein's abundance is Big Brother raw-dogging you in the yard while the guards watch, instead of in the shower while they look away.

    1. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      He is low-T and sounds like a girl when he talks. He obviously voted for Mamdani.

      1. Chumby   2 months ago

        Hey! He can bench 30 pounds.

    2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

      Did the akita watch?

    3. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      Be fair, it's a Democrat return to their roots, pre-1860 Southern landowner roots but details are unimportant.

  31. Rick James   2 months ago

    Ultra right winger and MAGA devotee Larry Summers is "stepping back" from public commitments after his deep relationship with Epstein has now been revealed.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      best-ever president of Hillsdale College.

    2. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      How deep?

      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        Larry Summers, former U.S. Treasury Secretary and Harvard University president, announced on November 17, 2025, that he is stepping back from public commitments after the release of emails revealing a years-long correspondence with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
        In a statement, Summers expressed that he is “deeply ashamed” of his actions and takes full responsibility for continuing communication with Epstein, though he will continue fulfilling his teaching obligations at Harvard.

        The emails, released by the U.S. House Oversight Committee, show communication between Summers and Epstein from 2013 to 2019, including the day before Epstein’s arrest in July 2019.
        Correspondence included personal topics such as romantic advice, politics, and attempts by Epstein to connect Summers with powerful figures, including a proposed meeting with the president of the United Nations.
        Summers sought Epstein’s advice on pursuing a woman he referred to as his mentee, and Epstein referred to himself as Summers’ “wing man” in one message.
        The Center for American Progress confirmed that Summers is ending his role as a “distinguished senior fellow”.
        His status at other institutions, including OpenAI’s board and Bloomberg News, remains unclear.
        Senator Elizabeth Warren and others criticized Summers, calling his association with Epstein a sign of “monumentally bad judgment” and questioning his ability to teach or advise.
        Summers previously resigned as Harvard president in 2006 amid controversy over sexist remarks, and the new revelations have reignited scrutiny of his conduct.

        1. Chumby   2 months ago

          A minor transgression?

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      "...after his deep relationship with Epstein has now been revealed."

      A trifle late there, like BBC caught doctoring Trump's speech. They're sorry (they got caught).

    4. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      "women have different capabilities and interests than men, on average, and this accounts for disparities in of sex ratios in certain roles" == "ultra right winger"

  32. Rick James   2 months ago

    What's going on in Silicon Valley? Revenue is looking good almost across the board. Advancements in artificial intelligence—and the infrastructure that supports it—are surging.

    That's a bit like saying, "What's going on in construction and agriculture? Revenue is looking good almost across the board. Immigration and the infrastructure that supports it is surging. But wages keep falling. Is this the new paradigm the sector must adjust to?"

  33. Rick James   2 months ago

    Some, like economist/writer Noah Smith, theorize that it's the AI boom that's canceling out the economic blow that would otherwise be dealt to the U.S. economy by tariffs.

    Tariffs would have destroyed America, but look! Over there! Your shoes are untied!

  34. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>“I’ve met Zohran Mamdani, voted for Zohran Mamdani. I don’t think there’s anything antisemitic about him at all,” says Ezra Klein.

    first fucking place I go for Judaism is Ezra Klein lol

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      "I knew Zohran Mamdani. I worked with Zohran Mamdani. You sir are no Zohran Mamdani".

  35. Rick James   2 months ago

    OpenAI, for example, might have an inflated valuation. But "Nvidia is often considered a bellwether AI stock" since so much of its "revenue comes from selling graphics processing units to power advanced AI systems, meaning that its success gives investors insight into the health of the sector overall," writes Cowen. "Currently, Nvidia's stock-price-to-earnings ratio is in the 54 to 55 range, roughly twice the typical market average. That means the market expects great things from this stock. Those projections may or may not be validated, but it's hard to conclude they're entirely divorced from reality." Cowen notes that many of these tech companies have invested their earnings in AI projects, not assuming tons of debt, meaning they're even less likely to incur a sudden crash.

    Does anyone else get the feeling Cowen could be replaced by a chatbot?

  36. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>This was always the insoluble problem for the "abundance Left":

    um, they're idiots individually and collectively?

  37. Rick James   2 months ago

    “I’ve met Zohran Mamdani, voted for Zohran Mamdani. I don’t think there’s anything antisemitic about him at all,” says Ezra Klein. He argues the right invokes Mamdani to deflect from its own slide into open bigotry, and uses the moment to analyze a deeper split in how Israel is understood across the spectrum.

    How's that libertarian/left alliance going, Reason?

    Ezra Klein Explains Why You Should Consider Voting For Gary Johnson
    The Washington Post's house progressive (OK, OK, he's not exactly alone over there) Ezra Klein explains today with astonishing succinctness why you should consider voting for Libertarian Party candidate Gary Johnson.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      the day after Brandon fell apart on stage he was telling someone on their show "sigh it's probably okay if Trump is president anyway"

  38. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Do you feel the Cruzmentum?

    I like Ted as my senator.

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      If you like your senator, you can keep your senator.

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        he can replace Sotomayor too afaic. idk about president

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (smarter than The Average Dude)   2 months ago

        But what if I hate both my Senators?

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          vote with your feet. kick them in the shins.

          1. Minadin   2 months ago

            One of his Senators doesn't have any shins.

            1. Dillinger   2 months ago

              I've tried nothing and I'm all out of ideas.

              1. Minadin   2 months ago

                It's OK, neither one of them has a backbone, either.

        2. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

          I’m in WA, so I hate both of mine, especially the really retarded one.

  39. Rick James   2 months ago

    How recycling car batteries leads to whole towns in Nigeria being lead-poisoned.

    And?

    1. Don't look at me! ( Is the war over yet?)   2 months ago

      Recycling will save the planet! (Except Nigeria).

      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        yeah, except that's not quite what's going on here. This isn't progressive "save the planet" recycling, this is more free-market-there's-value-here recycling. What's going on here is you have a country whose economy isn't a 'throwaway/replace' culture. It's a place where small shops can send out kids to retrieve dead batteries and... because labor is super-cheap they can set up a recycling operation-- crack open the case, pull the lead plates, melt them down-- and all this can be done in an un-zoned, unregulated backyard environment without any licensing or rules regarding hazardous waste disposal etc.

        I remember when these short reels would come into my instagram feed, showing a guy on the streets of Delhi doing just this, and you'd go into the comments and 99% were "wow, re-using those old batteries, and recycling by hand-- such craftsmanship" and 1% were, "uhh, he's like... breathing those lead fumes!"

        Edit: Well shit, I clicked on the link and it looks like you're right... I guess we've outsourced this recycling to Nigeria? So... uh, my bad, this IS save-the-planet recycling and it's even more retarded and less nuanced than I thought. While my first point still stands: Batteries are recyclable, outsourcing it to Nigeria is retarded.

        1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          99% of [lead-acid] car batteries in the US are recycled and processed inside the country.

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            That's what I thought. Lead is valuable, easy to recycle and expensive to ship. I bet the batteries in Nigeria are mostly coming from Africa and maybe Europe.

            1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

              I did a little googling and Europe is on par with the US in that regard. So the batteries in Nigeria are most likely local.

          2. Rick James   2 months ago

            That's what I thought. The NYT article is paywalled, so why the dark headline suggesting the auto industry is somehow to blame? Does anyone have any insight into the claims the article makes? Because if you're correct (and I have no reason to believe you're not) then my first thesis is correct.

  40. Rick James   2 months ago

    Abolish public sector unions:
    https://twitter.com/EsotericCD/status/1990587335675977824

    You're so close, Liz... so close. All you need to do is take that small step into the light!

  41. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Normally, it doesn't take too long for landlords like me-

    BOOOOOO!

  42. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    He is putting himself on a collision course with VP Vance, a Carlson ally widely seen as the 2028 GOP frontrunner.

    No one wants a Canadian as president.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      >>a Carlson ally

      lol I didn't see that part. those Swanson peach cobblers are poison I'd run like an antelope in the other direction from Tucker

  43. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

    Prison Guards in Portugal Force Transfer of Violent Transgender Inmate From Women’s Prison After Threatening To Strike
    https://reduxx.info/prison-guards-in-portugal-force-transfer-of-violent-transgender-inmate-from-womens-prison-after-threatening-to-strike/
    Portugal’s national union for prison staff has threatened to strike after a violent transgender inmate housed in a women’s facility injured five correctional officers. The inmate, born Miguel António and now known as “Raquel Teresa,” has since been transferred back to a men’s institution following what officials described as a prolonged campaign of intimidation against female staff and inmates.
    According to Sábado, the 48-year-old has been in and out of the prison system since 1993 for a variety of primarily violent offenses. While it is unclear when António began identifying as transgender, Portugal’s Directorate-General for Reintegration and Prison Services (DGRPS) has stated that he has not undergone any medical transition procedures and has only legally changed his name.
    Although António’s extensive criminal record is not comprehensively documented, it is known to span both Portugal and France. He was previously convicted in France of several serious crimes, including kidnapping, and served 15 years in prison. Portugal’s national union for prison guards (Sindicato Nacional do Corpo da Guarda Prisional) also reported that António was housed in two women’s prisons in Portugal as early as 2011 after receiving a sentence for rape.
    This placement would have occurred before the passage of Law 38 in 2018, which allowed adults in Portugal to change their legal gender through self-declaration. Shockingly, it also predated Circulation 2, a prison guideline requiring that a transgender person’s gender identity be considered when determining institutional placement and case management.
    By 2022, António was once again incarcerated for robbery. Initially placed in the Aveiro men’s facility, he was later transferred to the Santa Cruz do Bispo women’s prison, where he soon began attacking staff and fellow inmates. His behavior escalated to the point that domestic media outlets could no longer ignore the severity of the violence.
    According to Jornal de Notícias, in September 2025 António attempted to drown a female inmate in a toilet. The following month, he reportedly assaulted another female inmate and two female prison guards.
    Despite the clear danger he posed, António was subsequently moved to Tires – another women-only facility. Alarmingly, he was placed in Casa das Mães, a unit designated for mothers and their babies.
    While being held in isolation in this unit, António set his mattress on fire, sparking a blaze that resulted in five prison guards being hospitalized.

  44. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/11/where-is-democrats-transparency-on-epstein/

    lol hey Liz the White House is Just Asking Questions

  45. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    > "A lot of so-called bubbles pay off in the long run" writes Cowen for The Free Press (a theory also advanced by Byrne Hobart).

    This is true - and useless.

    Yes, bubble pay off in the long run. That doesn't tell you where you are wasting your investment money *now*. The 'dotcom' bubble paid off, certainly. Tons of people lost their shirts in the crash too.

    1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

      It pays off if the firms endure in the long term.

      1. Incunabulum   2 months ago

        No, not necessarily even then. You can waste an enormous amount of money and still survive - and not have that money pay off.

        And sure, the survivor of a bubble can end up with a major payout - but again, no one knows who that is going to be ahead of time so saying 'bubbles can pay off in the long run' is useless.

        We know they *can*. We know many don't. We know a company that survives a bubble can profit immensely, we know that most won't. We just do not know which is which.

        1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          How many years did Amazon operate at a loss?

    2. Weigel's Cock Ring   2 months ago

      The overwhelming majority of regular people with regular jobs should never ever try to pick individual stocks or time market tops and bottoms themselves, and I certainly include myself here. Most of us simply have neither the detailed business or financial.knowledge and information required, nor the time, diligence, and work ethic needed in order to obtain it. And individuals are always at a huge timing disadvantage against the big money boys and firms who have the best automated algorithms and are always at the front of the trading line.

      If you aren't certain whether or not you can beat the S&P 500 or a solid index fund on your own, you almost certainly can't and shouldn't waste your time and money trying. The smart move is to leave your investments in the hands of established pros whose full time job it is to research these companies and build solid diversified portfolios for you, and sit back and let time and compound interest work its magic without losing sleep and panicking over the periodic downturns.

      1. Incunabulum   2 months ago

        The established pros are funneling money into the bubble.

        That is my point - *no one knows who is going to win*.

        1. Weigel's Cock Ring   2 months ago

          This is absolutely true, the same way it's true that the substantial majority of new business ventures end up failing in a relatively short period of time, but that doesn't mean that capitalism doesn't work or that investment is a bad idea. You cannot have meaningful success and innovation without experiencing a LOT of failure and flops along the way! Thomas Edison didn't invent the working light bulb on his very first attempt, it took hundreds (if not thousands) of failed attempts first. Half the point of capital investment in new technologies is to find out what works and what doesn't. The small percentage who eventually end up winning are much stronger and better off because of all the losers.

          But the good news is that it's a free country and you're not require to invest your hard-earned money in anything if you don't want to! You can put your savings in a CD with an APR of 3.5 to 4 percent, you can put it in a money market with an APR of .01 percent, or if even that is too risky you can hide it in your mattress or a coffee can buried in your backyard, no one is going to stop you!

  46. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    >Those projections may or may not be validated, but it's hard to conclude they're entirely divorced from reality." Cowen notes

    Pets.com was also had a high price-to-earnings ratio. Until it didn't.

    1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

      What was the story behind Pets.com?

      1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

        https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/08/dotcom-pets-dot-com.asp

      2. Incunabulum   2 months ago

        Its the archetype of a startup that got huge during the dotcom bubble in the early 2000's. They generated some hype, got people to invest in the hype, never had a viable product, never had a path to viability, one of the most high profile of a ton of companies in the same position - 'internet is the next big thing, better get in while the getting is good' investing hype and once people realized success wasn't that easy money dried up, the companies died.

        Massive tulip bubble in effect.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          I was hardly an experienced investor at the time and I've been guilty of FOMO at times but even I was scratching my head back then. Smart people were dumping huge cash into a business with no business model. But the bubble did make the principals of Pets.com very wealthy so not a total loss.

  47. JFree   2 months ago

    Per-employee productivity, possibly enhanced by AI, is on the rise; firms are able to easily make do with less headcount.

    This is like Marxist Economics 101. It's amazing how this is exactly what neoclassical economics - and basic 'capitalist' ideas are based on. Productivity of labor does not reward labor. It rewards capital. The argument is not that Marx was wrong. It's that one should side with capital instead of labor.

    Is it any wonder why Marxism retains its appeal to those who will never receive much reward (beyond the crumbs of Bismarckian welfare that are intended solely to numb them into quietude) from their own increased productivity in the existing system?

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      "This is like Marxist Economics 101. It's amazing how this is exactly what neoclassical economics - and basic 'capitalist' ideas are based on. Productivity of labor does not reward labor. It rewards capital. The argument is not that Marx was wrong. It's that one should side with capital instead of labor."

      ^This is like JFuck's normal piles of lies. Are you really that fucking stupid, asshole? Why do you think "labor" labors? For the fun of it?
      Under Marxism, they pretend to work and the government pretends to pay them. Not so under capitalism, you imbecile.

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      It's a wonder to anyone completely oblivious to the last 300 years of Western history and is unaware that today's workers are fabulously wealthy compared to their ancestors from previous centuries.

      1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

        I'd rather be a poor American today than a king three hundred years ago.

        Imagine life without hot showers, deodorant, antibiotics, toothpaste, year-round produce, frozen dinners, prescription glasses and whatever other things we take for granted that hadn't even been imagined a few centuries ago. Would you trade any of that to be a king in the 1700s? I sure wouldn't.

        1. JFree   2 months ago

          That is just ideological silliness. Technology is not an exclusive consequence of capitalism. Marx wrote extensively (and quite boringly) about technology.

          His main underlying point about controlling the means of production is that labor then decides how and to what purpose technology is applied. Rather than 'capital' deciding how that occurs at the direct expense of labor

          If you want to make a point about the relative pace of technological change under capitalism v Marxism, then be SPECIFIC and make that point. Schumpeter did that - but that is not the same as this BS handwaving that pervades Reason/libertarianism.

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            His main underlying point is that workers should own the means of production. The only way that can happen is to ignore property rights. If someone works hard to build the capital to buy some machines that produce widgets, then hires some people to work the machines, according to Marx the workers should then take possession of the machines. That is obviously not fair to the person who worked to purchase the machines. Why on earth would they willingly do that, knowing that it will be stolen? They won't. The problem here is incentives. Property rights, including capital ownership, create incentives to build and innovate. Collective ownership takes those incentives away. Which is why societies and economies that protect property rights will always outperform collectivist societies and economies. Incentives. It's the foundation of modern economic thought.

            1. mtrueman   2 months ago

              " Incentives. It's the foundation of modern economic thought."

              Incentives were also central to life in the Soviet Union. Passport to live in Moscow, allocation of better housing, clothing, medicine, cars, food etc, ability of enjoy foreign travel, badges, medals, and awards.

              The problem with incentives, either capitalism or communism, is diminishing returns. Once you've installed your first swimming pool, the incentive to install a second falls off dramatically.

            2. JFree   2 months ago

              I'm not supporting the Marxist PRESCRIPTION. I am saying that the ANALYSIS of the economic dynamic that creates the problem is the same for both Marx and for those who purport to oppose Marx. And yet the latter do so by ignoring the problem and hand waving it away. By essentially demonizing mere labor. Which is why they lose the battle of being relevant.

              Personally - my prescription for the problem is even older than Marx. A periodic jubilee or a reset. Not the perpetual hand waving that leads ultimately to revolution - or the calls for revolution that lead to totalitarian dictatorship from that point on. But how to do a reset? That's the question.

              1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                I'm not supporting the Marxist PRESCRIPTION.

                Didn't say you were.

                I am saying that the ANALYSIS of the economic dynamic that creates the problem is the same for both Marx and for those who purport to oppose Marx. And yet the latter do so by ignoring the problem and hand waving it away. By essentially demonizing mere labor. Which is why they lose the battle of being relevant.

                This is the first time I've seen it framed that way. I'm not sure who is making that argument. Certainly not me.

                What you call "mere labor" economists call "human capital", and it is significant. Human wants are infinite, but there are a finite number of people. When people are freed from one thing they're available for another.

                People freed from farm work went into manufacturing. As manufacturing needed fewer hands people went into services.

                Farmers a hundred years ago could not even imagine hiring a wedding planner. And we can't imagine what will be commonplace a century from now.

                Let AI free human capital. People were freed from various chores as technology made them easier. In all cases hands and minds were freed to do other things. A farmer a century ago couldn't imagine hiring a wedding planner, which is a job that AI might replace. A century from now people will be doing things we can't imagine.

                The best time in history to ever live is right now.

                1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                  And the best time to hire an editor is yesterday.

              2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                A periodic jubilee or a reset.

                Ummm... no. Debt forgiveness every fifty years? That's unserious.

                However I would support a mandatory sunset of twenty years on all legislation, and make the process of renewing it cumbersome. Ideally legislators would be so caught up in reconsidering important stuff that they wouldn't have the time to make our lives miserable with trivial bullshit.

                But how to do a reset? That's the question.

                There is no reset button. No instructions or manual that I'm aware of, though religious people might argue otherwise.

                1. JFree   2 months ago

                  Debt forgiveness every fifty years? That's unserious.

                  It's quite serious if you look at how it was actually done. Not in the Bible (it was never done by the Hebrews) but in Babylon. Kings would clear debts in order to free the peasants from service/slavery to a big creditor. For 'community service' instead - which also served to diminish the power of those creditors so that they couldn't simply take over the entire state/law.

                  It is recorded on every stele/etc that is evidence of 'law' from Hammurabi to them all. Usually an invasion of barbarians where 'the community' can no longer rely on money/taxes (ie big creditors) for defense because big money quickly doesn't give a shit. But must instead rely on actual service of people who don't have places to flee but need a stake (meaning a homestead, a small plot of land) which they will defend. Where it is the poor and stakeless who actually defend - as in fact they always do become the core of defense.

                  It's the same idea as yeoman militia for defense, jury duty for trials, nightwatchman for neighborhood patrols, volunteer fire departments for fire protection, limits/caps on land ownership, etc. Actual service (labor) replaces money/taxes (capital). The way that is done is by resetting all the money/debt obligations. The reason the debt gets out of whack is because math (the basis of interest/debt/money) can, over time, be more tyrannical than reality (crop failures, plant growth, etc) - and that compounds if there is no possible reset.

                  There is no reset button. No instructions or manual that I'm aware of, though religious people might argue otherwise.

                  I agree. But that is exactly how AI could be used. In the service of governance - of conflicts between creditor and debtor - etc. Something beyond mere service on behalf of a claimed 'owner' at the direct expense of everyone else.

      2. JFree   2 months ago

        More "handwaving as argument". The real median personal income in the US over the last 50 years has gone nowhere. That is why Trump was elected - by that lower 50% that KNOWS their life is no better now. That is why Mamdani and the DemSocs are getting traction from 150 year old ideas.

        1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          Income itself doesn't matter. What matters is what that income can buy. A better comparison would be the price of things in hours worked, 50 years ago vs now. And wouldn't you know it, someone already thought of that!
          This was done a little over ten years ago, but the point remains.

          https://cafehayek.com/2013/01/cataloging-our-progress-using-sears-com-selection-on-new-years-day-2013.html

          – Manual treadmill: 1975 price was $89.99 (or 18.5 hours of work in 1975); 2013 price is $127.99 (or 6.5 hours of work today)

          – adult athletic shoes: 1975 price was $9.95 (or 2.0 hours); 2013 price is $19.99 (or 1.0 hour)

          – adult jeans:* 1975 price was $6.99 (or 1.4 hours); 2013 price is $19.99 (or 1.0 hour)

          – television (19″ color): 1975 price was $294.95 (or 60.6 hours); 2013 price is $129.99 (or 6.6 hours)

          – 30″ kitchen all-electric range/oven: 1975 price was $159.95 (or 32.8 hours); 2013 price is $369.99 (or 18.6 hours)

          – frost-free refrigerator/freezer:** 1975 price was $319.95 [for 14.1 cubic feet] (or 65.7 hours); 2013 price is $404.99 [for 14.8 cubic feet] (or 20.4 hours)

          – “standard size” all-electric washer/dryer combo: 1975 price was $329.90 (or 67.7 hours); 2013 price is $593.98 (or 29.9 hours)

          To any objective person it should be obvious that, given the same income, people are much better off today than fifty years ago.

          1. JFree   2 months ago

            A better comparison would be the price of things in hours worked, 50 years ago vs now. And wouldn't you know it, someone already thought of that!

            No. Mostly you're just falling for every nonsensical assumption that gets applied in 'inflation adjustments'. Hedonic adjustments - where every technology that exists now is what was also preferred by consumers - is one of those. Shirts is an obvious one - where cheap shirts that fall apart and are replaced more often - are somehow viewed as an 'improvement'. And the 'changing consumer preference' - from a higher weighting of steak - to hamburger - to (soon) dog food - is merely an expression of consumer preference not of being squeezed.

            Not to mention all the things that people want to buy but that are not even included (or correctly included) in inflation adjustments. Which includes everything bought with debt as well as what is 'excluded' because it is deemed 'savings' not 'consumption'. eg - the ability to buy $1 (real) for retirement or for a downpayment on a house. That is the core and VERY legitimate complaint of GenZ because those benefits accrue entirely to those who bought their assets decades ago - and drove up multiples for anyone looking to buy now.

            1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

              What is the purpose of income? To buy stuff. Not to have money for money’s sake.
              So comparing what money can buy is the only relevant measure of incomes.
              Writing off what money can buy as “hedonism” is hand waving at its finest.
              Don’t be a Jesse and accuse people of doing what you are doing while you are doing it.

              1. JFree   2 months ago

                'To buy stuff' is exactly why inflation adjustments are made. You want to pretend that appliances are pretty much everything that we buy. When in fact they are now mostly bought using credit - not cash - because appliances are the sort of thing that is bought very early on when one has nothing and a low income. So what you record as 'the cost' is not at all the real cost which includes a whole bunch of interest - and often requires two or three more purchases of the same thing before they can finally own a thing that hasn't broken.

                And hedonism is not hedonic though I suppose it is the same root. Hedonic in stats is the notion that everything you purchase is deemed a preference. If it changes over time, then those are merely preferences. So if people eat less steak and more hamburger - that is merely a preference not an affordability squeeze. If they start eating more dog food or chicken instead of hamburger, that too is merely a preference not a squeeze.

                Nowadays - in fact - kids now also have to live longer in their parents basement so if they are buying a TV they are having to stick it in their parent's basement because they can't pay the damn rent for a place of their own. Which they most certainly were able to do in 1975 and when no self-respecting teen stayed in their parents basement until their mid-twenties.

                1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                  You want to pretend that appliances are pretty much everything that we buy.

                  I'm not pretending anything. I'm quoting from what someone else did.

                  When in fact they are now mostly bought using credit - not cash - because appliances are the sort of thing that is bought very early on when one has nothing and a low income.

                  I disagree. Perhaps in the past when they cost week and a half's worth of work. But now we're talking less than a week. That's doable without credit.

                  So if people eat less steak and more hamburger - that is merely a preference not an affordability squeeze.

                  Really? You think people will pass on a steak and choose a hamburger instead out of preference? Get real.

                  Nowadays - in fact - kids now also have to live longer in their parents basement so if they are buying a TV they are having to stick it in their parent's basement because they can't pay the damn rent for a place of their own.

                  Nowadays a very nice TV costs less than a week's worth of rent. Heck, someone could buy a TV, washer and dryer, and a dishwashing machine for about a month's rent. I'm not going to deny that the cost of housing is absurd. But the cost of everything else, in time worked, has dropped dramatically. Which makes comparisons based upon income alone, as opposed to what that income can buy, rather meaningless.

                  1. JFree   2 months ago

                    I disagree. Perhaps in the past when they cost week and a half's worth of work. But now we're talking less than a week. That's doable without credit.

                    Well you're wrong. Even ignoring the BS inflation adjustment that is at the heart of that article. Even by 1975 (the first year of that article), Sears prices were no longer competitive. Their rural customers (the heart of the catalog business) started getting picked off by WalMart. Their urban low-end customers started getting picked off by KMart and Target - and in the early 80's by the big box retailers (Best Buy, ToysRUs, Home Depot). That is why Sears no longer exists and even by 1980 the stores looked a bit decrepit. By 2013, their website prices were the same as every other website in the world. Even if they were no longer selling anything from there.

                    BLS does do a hell of a job sourcing where/how they get their prices. They screw up on the basket weightings and are bullied into understating inflation because a lot of govt spending depends on inflation metrics. But not the raw data gathering. Maybe Boudreaux could have spent a bit more time figuring out the reality of how price data is gathered and a bit less time trying to make an ideological point.

                    Plus - for the lower income, financing is the major way they pay. The rich can think about the cash and carry price. For the low income, the monthly nut is what matters. Every item in that list except the shoes and jeans is usually financed by the low income. Sears became the major retailer BECAUSE they offered financing but financing also then jacks up the overhead and changes the biz model which is why Sears bought finance businesses (Dean Witter, Coldwell Banker, Discover, Allstate) by the early 1980's.

                    1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      Fine. I'll concede that people are still buying the stuff on credit.

                      It's still a smaller portion of their paycheck compared to fifty years ago.

                  2. JFree   2 months ago

                    I'm not going to deny that the cost of housing is absurd. But the cost of everything else, in time worked, has dropped dramatically.

                    Which is nonsense. Housing cost is not only absurd, it is the highest weighting in a CPI (which is also why they lie about the increases by using 'imputed rent'). Medical is obscene - and the low income also do not get the same benefits coverage (or sometimes any coverage) as the high income do now or as the low income got in 1975. So anything catastrophic - look for bankruptcy. Transportation overall also costs relatively more even though that is also a function of overly expensive housing which means longer commutes. Food/energy rise at a lower rate - but they are also excluded from 'core' measures - which means price volatility risks fall entirely on the low income which hugely affects safety net calls, job instability, and all the other stuff that eliminates a persons rainy day fund.

                    Speaking of rainy day fund (or retirement), asset price increases mean that $1 of dividends/earnings/yield costs MUCH more for someone who needs to acquire than it does for someone who already owns that and can have the asset itself pay for any additional. Making it harder to climb the ladder beyond median income.

                    I don't trust 'wealth' methodology at all - but the study I have seen indicates that median wealth grew ok from 1962 to 1989 (including the 'stagflation 70's). Since then the median wealth has simply been riding bubbles up and crashing down hard. By 2013, the real median wealth was the same as the 1960's. No change at all in 50 years. The mean has not seen that timeframe as 'bubbles' but as ups and downs trending up. The 1% has probably not had downs at all though that would a sampling artifact. Since then obviously we've been blowing multi-bubbles so its hard to see what the next downturn looks like - but I bet that financialization of the economy will once again gut the median, inconvenience the mean, and not even affect the wealthy.

                    Anyone using a TV or a treadmill as a measure of how much better off we are is - dishonest as fuck and deliberately so.

        2. Marshal   2 months ago

          Again JFree shows us he doesn't understand statistics.

          1. His own data show the media income has increased ~60% from 28.7k to 45.1k. So he's lying even about the base numbers. Apparently a 60% increase is "going nowhere".

          2. Because the populations are not the same they are not directly comparable. Over this period we've experienced mass migration with roughly ~90 million residents either immigrants or the children of immigrants, and these are massively disproportionately lower income. Their presence in the second dataset while having no comparative antecedent in the earlier dataset set means our economy cannot be judged simply by comparing these numbers. The result of this immigration is that if our economy literally did not improve anyone's income at all the median income would have dropped significantly. Because the immigrant group represents more than 25% of our total population the impact is huge. The fact that we achieved 60% growth while also absorbing ~90 million new people is remarkable.

          This is why the left supports mass immigration, especially of illegals who are even more disproportionately low income than legal immigrants. They need these talking points to mislead their activists who aren't smart enough to understand what they are parroting.

          1. JFree   2 months ago

            Apparently a 60% increase is "going nowhere".

            A 60% increase over 50 years is 0.9% per year. That should raise questions about whether the inflation that adjusts those numbers is real or understated. You apparently have no questions at all about that. Govt measures are entirely accurate. John Williams at shadowstats.com has calculated a different measure of inflation that shows that ACTUAL inflation is about 3% higher per year than the CPI records. So - instead of a 0.9% increase - a -2.1% per year decrease.

            That is JUST the inflation adjustment. It is not recording the PRODUCTIVITY increase. That has been recorded as ranging from 1.5% per year to 2.8% per year. Both of which would more than completely offset the 0.9% per year - even if the inflation measures are completely accurate and not understated at all. IOW - PRODUCTIVITY does not increase incomes for the lower 50% - for the last two GENERATIONS.

            No surprise - you are adopting the fascist approach to an economic problem. Pretending that the median income is now some foreign migrant not some American. That's why there is no problem. Just deport them all and the measured median income of Americans will rise back up and prove that it was all just a statistical fluke. Govt measures are entirely inaccurate.

            It does not surprise me in the least that that form of hand waving - ignoring the problem - also results in your fascist solution.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              No surprise - you are adopting the fascist approach to an economic problem.

              Again we see the left's idiotic approach to politics, call anyone who disagrees with them a fascist. Amusingly he doesn't even seem to understand what fascist means.

              Just deport them all and the measured median income of Americans will rise back up

              This lunacy shows how they mistake measures for reality. My point is that the measure they use to test economic health is wrong and their belief is that you have to change reality to fix the measure rather than recognize the weakness in the statistic. Where do they find people this stupid?

      3. Use the Schwartz   2 months ago

        Nothing but a huge block of gray boxes after your post LOL!

    3. Marshal   2 months ago

      This is like Marxist Economics 101. It's amazing how this is exactly what neoclassical economics - and basic 'capitalist' ideas are based on. Productivity of labor does not reward labor. It rewards capital.

      What has made "labor" more productive is the development of better tools, which was only possible through the application of capital and organization. But Marxists pretend these increases come from labor because they believe only what advances their political preferences, reality is not a consideration.

      1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

        What has made "labor" more productive is the development of better tools, which was only possible through the application of capital and organization.

        Yup. And that includes the automation of manufacturing that Trump wants to roll-back to make the country grate again.

        But Marxists pretend these increases come from labor because they believe only what advances their political preferences, reality is not a consideration.

        Marxism is based in part on the labor theory of value - that something is inherently worth more the more work is put into it. So something that was handmade is more valuable than the same thing made by machines. Any parent of a child who has worked hard on a project can tell you that spending a lot of time on something doesn't automatically make it worth more, but that's what Marxists believe. The politics follow from that. The fact that you put politics first and everything else second doesn't mean everyone does the same thing. That's just you projecting your bad faith onto anyone who you disagree with. After all, how can anyone possibly think differently than Marshal unless they have evil motives, right? It's the only explanation.

        1. Marshal   2 months ago

          The fact that you put politics first and everything else second

          It's weird that you morph into this without any evidence or support at all. Anyway, cheers and fuck off mate!

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            It's weird that you morph into this without any evidence or support at all.

            Confession by projection, buddy. You always make that accusation of others. Why? Because it's what you do.

            Anyway, cheers and fuck off mate!

            Go suck a bag of dicks.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              Confession by projection

              It's odd you think that because you do something I must also, but at least it explains how you reach conclusions which are completely illogical. Maybe someday your hatred will subside and allow you to think clearly.

              1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                No bub. You’ve got me confused with your buddy Jesse who accuses others of doing what he is doing while he is doing it.

                1. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

                  More projection. Hilarious.

                  Can you provide an example? I keep providing examples for you doing so. See yesterday.

                2. Marshal   2 months ago

                  You’ve got me confused with your buddy Jesse who accuses others of doing what he is doing while he is doing it.

                  If so that would make him just like you, which gives us some insight to your psyche that you hate him for it.

                  1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                    When you make an argument that doesn’t assume evil motives on the part of the other person I will shut up. Until then you’re just a bad faith actor who assumes bad faith in others.
                    That’s all. Nothing more.

                    1. Marshal   2 months ago

                      Fake sarc:
                      When you make an argument that doesn’t assume evil motives on the part of the other person I will shut up.

                      Real sarc:
                      After all, how can anyone possibly think differently than Marshal unless they have evil motives, right? It's the only explanation.

                      Here's yet another example of you doing what you criticize others for.

                      The last time you made a fool of yourself you tried to claim even mentioning a person makes the comment risible and wrong, yet look back at the first comment you made. Of course you made it personal, because to you principles are things you make up to attack others. You never apply them generally and certainly never to yourself.

                    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      Um, no. I'm saying the same thing in both comments, just in a different manner.

                      You're not fooling or impressing anyone right now, except maybe a few idiots who I keep on mute. Seriously. That comment is Jesse-level reasoning. In the past when I'd follow his links to what I supposedly said, what I actually said didn't match what he claimed I said. Not even a little bit. And you're doing it right now, minus the link. I can't tell if you're dishonest, obtuse, or stupid. In his case it's stupidity. The guy is mind-numbingly dumb. It breaks my heart that he has family that must endure his presence. In your case though, considering how you always accuse others of dishonesty, that's what I'm going to go with.

                    3. Marshal   2 months ago

                      Um, no. I'm saying the same thing in both comments, just in a different manner.

                      You're also assuming evil motives on my part and then whining that others assume evil motives about you or your allies. But you don't care about breaking the standard your criticize others for breaking. To sum up you only care about Principals and not Principles.

                    4. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      But you don't care about breaking the standard your criticize others for breaking.

                      Tu quoque is a Latin term meaning "you too," and it refers to the logical fallacy of trying to discredit an opponent's argument by pointing out their own hypocrisy instead of addressing the argument itself. This is an evasive tactic that deflects criticism by attacking the accuser's past actions or inconsistent behavior to suggest their argument is invalid. It is also known as the "you too" fallacy, an appeal to hypocrisy, and a form of ad hominem attack.

                    5. Chumby   2 months ago

                      Sarc will support (Dem) principals over principles every day of the week that ends in Y.

                    6. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      This began by me responding to you saying the following:

                      But Marxists pretend these increases come from labor because they believe only what advances their political preferences, reality is not a consideration.

                      That's a textbook statement of bad faith. You've already decided that whatever they say is not worth consideration. Label attached, filter on, aim insult cannon. Discussion mode off. That's what bad faith means.

                      You're a fucking dick like that. Telling people what they think and daring them to argue with what you rehearsed while driving alone to work and back. I feel ya. But it's tired.

                    7. Marshal   2 months ago

                      the logical fallacy of trying to discredit an opponent's argument

                      You're not making an argument, you're making a personal attack. Your problem is that you've heard of these things but you don't understand them, so you don't understand when they apply and when they don't. Whining about personal attacks while making them is peak sarc.

            2. JesseAz (RIP CK)   2 months ago

              He had zero politics for your transition dumdum.

              You now project your own projection onto others. A desire to be hated just so you are noticed.

              1. Chumby   2 months ago

                He’s going to fake mute you again. The post at the bottom of the comments, “So many grey boxes.”

                1. SCOTUS gave JeffSarc a big sad   2 months ago

                  Sarc will NEVER mute Jesse, as Sarc is in love with him. It’s more retarded version of The Joker’s homoerotic fixation on Batman.

        2. See.More   2 months ago

          And that includes the automation of manufacturing that Trump wants to roll-back to make the country grate again

          No. No. No!

          It's not automation of manufacturing that Trump wants to roll back to Make America Grate Again. It's pre-shredded cheese and carrots that he wants to roll back.

          Grate your own damn cheese and carrots!

      2. mtrueman   2 months ago

        "What has made "labor" more productive is the development of better tools, which was only possible through the application of capital and organization. "

        Tautology. It's employees who are 'applying capital,' ie working. Management can organize and supply workers with larger shovels, but productivity isn't increasing until working start using them.

        1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

          The point that you missed was that workers with shovels are more productive than workers with spoons, and workers with backhoes are more productive than workers with shovels. Spoons, shovels and backhoes are the capital in this example. Labor becomes more productive when capitalists provide better tools.

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            "The point that you missed was that workers with shovels are more productive than workers with spoons,"

            I haven't missed that point. I tried to make it clear when I wrote "but productivity isn't increasing until working start using them," implying that productivity WILL increase with workers using better tools.

            I was pointing out Marshal's fallacy that labor is something other than the application of capital, whether that capital is spoons, shovels or backhoes.

          2. JFree   2 months ago

            But the return on those backhoes, shovels, spoons is very simply interest on the capital used to deploy them. That's all competed away to the same level. The profit (return to the entrepreneur who made the decision to deploy backhoes v shovels v spoons) is, in a Marxist sense, a legitimate return on that organizational form. But NOT when that profit includes both an organizational component (entrepreneur) and the operational component (labor using those tools).

            This is where the Chinese implementation is very different than the Soviet one. In the Chinese system, the entrepreneur ultimately loses their organizational 'barrier' via competition. So they get a window - but their govt always tilts the field towards the NEXT entrepreneur not the current one. The downside is - capital flight from both entrepreneurs and the corrupt govt officials who want to tilt the field toward the current entrepreneurs - see increasing house prices in CA that drives homelessness in that state and increases rentier incomes in that state.

        2. Marshal   2 months ago

          It's employees who are 'applying capital,' ie working.

          Ridiculously wrong. There is value in both the tools and the labor, and your politically driven desire to ignore the value of the tools does not "win" the debate, it breaks your model because it no longer described reality. The entire history of your preferred governance is exactly this: failure because you don't accept reality.

          1. mtrueman   2 months ago

            "your politically driven desire to ignore the value of the tools does not "win" the debate,"

            I have no desire to ignore this. In fact I plainly state that workers using (applying) better tools increased worker productivity. I missed this the first time, I beg you to re-read and reconsider.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              You admit the tool increases productivity, but you wrongly claim this benefit accrues to labor because it is they who are working. In truth the tool has a value separate from labor and your and Marx's attempt to reduce everything to labor will always fail because it doesn't describe reality.

              1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                "In truth the tool has a value separate from labor"

                The tool becomes productive when the worker puts it to use.

                1. Marshal   2 months ago

                  Yes, but that doesn't prove what you and Marx wishes it did.

                  I have a tool and you're not willing to accept it provides any value so you won't give me anything in exchange for it. Since I will receive nothing I will not give it to you and your labor remains unimproved.

                  This is the economic model you and Marx want us to accept. Pass.

                  1. mtrueman   2 months ago

                    I am not sure what makes you think you know what I wish. I tried to make the point that labor productivity only increases when the tools provided are put to use or 'applied,' as you might say, by the workers. I think this is fairly standard economics theory, even if Marx had the same view.

                    1. Marshal   2 months ago

                      I am not sure what makes you think you know what I wish.

                      You keep asserting it.

                      I tried to make the point that labor productivity only increases

                      No, you tried to make the point that these increases in value accrue only to labor despite their only being possible through the application of tools.

                    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      You keep asserting it.

                      No he did not. That's you being a bad faith actor and projecting your bad motivations onto others.

                    3. mtrueman   2 months ago

                      "No, you tried to make the point that these increases in value "

                      This is untrue. I make no mention of increases in value. I am referring to productivity, something entirely different. Please re-read my comments and familiarize yourself with labor productivity and how it is measured. Less mind reading and less red baiting will also improve your commenting.

      3. JFree   2 months ago

        which was only possible through the application of capital and organization.

        The 'organization' part of that - the entrepreneur - is post-classical (Schumpeter) so yeah it's not included in classical/Marx stuff. But nor does the entrepreneur create a lasting advantage. So their 'return' on that factor can simply be included as a new factor to capital, land, labor.

        As for the 'capital' part - classical economics (including Marx) all basically agreed that true capital was merely a form of stored/saved labor - mediated and paid through time in order to 'compete' with consumption. It was not land or rent. And the fact that it is depreciated - becomes less valuable over time - proves that.

        Nothing about either of those creates a 'surplus value' that permanently accrues to that sub-element of production (ie eliminates labor being paid for ITS productivity). If it is distorting govt to restrict competition, then that is just a class war thing. If the value is going to consumers (via LOWER prices), then that should be manifest in either deflation or whatever 'inflation adjustment' is used to indicate real median personal income over generations. And what that shows is that, at the lower levels, labor is simply paid just enough to survive until work starts tomorrow. No more, no less. Quite Malthusian really (without those errors of population growth).

        1. Marshal   2 months ago

          But nor does the entrepreneur create a lasting advantage

          This is incorrect. The resulting business may not retain a definitive advantage over other businesses, but if it reverts to no advantage at all it will cease to exist.

          In reality the business itself is a leveraging tool which vastly increases productivity. That increase in productivity due to the business organization is a value separate from labor.

          1. JFree   2 months ago

            If that organization can deliver something 'more', then it has a target on its back and will attract competition and that 'more' will be competed away.

            The only way that advantage can be lasting is if competition is suppressed and a barrier to entry is created. One of the main differences between classical economics (which includes Marx) and neoclassical/marginalist (which is all that is taught today.

            In classical economics, the assumption by everyone from Smith to Marx/George was, in the words of Smith People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.

            In neoclassical the assumption is that 'market structure' - eg competition v oligopoly/cartels - is a deus ex machina. It just happens and nothing can really be done.

            Hell in the libertarian version of neoclassical, govt is that deus ex machina and they are, like an alien, just creating monopolies and oligopolies for no real reason at all and the cronies are basically innocent and always unnamed. If only govt could cease to exist - then people of the same trade could once again meet together to conspire against the public. Hmm. This doesn't make sense does it.

            1. Marshal   2 months ago

              If that organization can deliver something 'more', then it has a target on its back and will attract competition and that 'more' will be competed away.

              That's not the relevant comparison. If one business becomes better than another the original business disappears, but the replacing business offers an even better tool. The economic analysis we're making compares a person's productivity without the leveraging tool of a business to what it is with the business. A new business taking the place of the old still leaves the gap.

  48. mtrueman   2 months ago

    John Lennon was an excellent vocalist, performer and song writer. But had fairly pedestrian tastes as a musician. Also, he was pretty thuggish in his early days. There are even some who attribute Stuart Sutcliffe's head injuries to Lennon beatings. Luckily he found Yoko, a calming influence far more intelligent and sophisticated, and was able to find some peace of mind.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

      People like to piss on her and pretend she was wearing the pants in the relationship and ruined the Beatles, but the whole reason Lennon liked her is she was submissive in the traditional Japanese housewife way. The Japanese, even in the sixties, were next level when it came to the husband as total boss.
      Lennon liked to pin the blame for what were actually his decisions on her, and even guys like McCartney fell for it. She wasn't always at the studio to keep an eye on John, she was there because he made her. She served him like a king, and when John didn't like something or want to do something, he said it was Yoko.

      I love Lennon's music but he was a class A asshole in his romantic life.

      1. mtrueman   2 months ago

        Yoko was hardly a typical Japanese housewife. She came from one of the wealthiest families in Japan and played tennis with the Crown Prince while at university. She was raised in New York as a youth, spent time in mental institutions, was ostracized by her family for her work such as "Cut Piece" and forced to live in poverty. Quite a singular character.

        Lennon may have looked on Yoko as more of a mother figure, and May Pang, the mistress Yoko passed on to Lennon when she tired of his shenanigans, would more likely be cast as the typical (Chinese-American) submissive housewife.

  49. Mother's Lament   2 months ago

    "Venezuela's President Nicolás Maduro breaks into singing John Lennon's 'Imagine'"

    I'm a fan of Lennon, but that song is a nihilistic, it presents utopia by subtraction, romanticizes collectivism and has antihuman undertones.
    No wonder it a hymn for the UN and communist dictators like Maduro.

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      The best that can be said for that song is that he kind of acknowledges that it's a pipe dream and not going to happen.

    2. mtrueman   2 months ago

      "but that song is a nihilistic"

      I've always thought of it as an injunction, commanding us to use our imagination. The first step to solve our problems is to imagine an alternative. Lennon told us he imagines a world without countries or religions to divide us. You're free to imagine other things.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How the FCC Became the Speech Police

Jacob Sullum | From the February/March 2026 issue

Why Can't New York Get Rid of 2-Person Subway Crews?

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 1.17.2026 7:00 AM

ICE Agents Flouted DHS Policies That Could Have Prevented Renee Good's Death

Jacob Sullum | 1.16.2026 4:15 PM

Video Shows Feds Shooting ICE Protester With Nonlethal Round at Point-Blank Range, Blinding Him in One Eye

Autumn Billings | 1.16.2026 3:51 PM

Do Cellphones Cause Cancer? RFK Jr.'s HHS Is Suppressing FDA Data Confirming Cellphone Safety.

Ronald Bailey | 1.16.2026 3:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks