The U.S. Military Is Helping Arab Dictatorships Run Psyops
The Pentagon spends a lot of taxpayer money on propaganda worldwide. Some of it is coordinated with Middle Eastern dictators, The Washington Post revealed.
The U.S. has done a lot for Arab dictators. For years, Democrats and Republicans have been seeking to give Saudi Arabia, the largest purchaser of American weapons in the world, a NATO-like defense pact. And Washington is drawing closer to Qatar, the Saudi kingdom's nearby frenemy. After pledging to defend Qatar last month, the Trump administration announced a new training facility for Qatari military pilots in Idaho last week.
One of the many favors that the U.S. has given to these governments is helping to drown out dissenting voices, documents given to The Washington Post by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists reveal. Over the past three years, U.S. officials led meetings of Middle Eastern countries to plan "information operations," the documents show, and planned to create a "Combined Middle East Cyber Center" and an "Information Fusion Center" to systematize these efforts.
The documents were a series of PowerPoint presentations about the "Regional Security Construct," a secret U.S.-led coalition which includes Israel, Qatar, Bahrain, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. Kuwait and Oman were listed as "potential partners" whose officials were briefed about the coalition meetings.
The Post's coverage focuses on the hypocrisy of the Arab states; while they denounced Israel's war in Gaza, those states were actively working with the Israeli military, including on tunnel warfare training and air defense coordination. However, buried in the reporting is the revelation that those states are receiving direct American help in shaping their propaganda campaigns.
U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) officials were leading meetings on "information operations to counter Iran's narrative that it is the regional protector of Palestinians and, according to a 2025 document, to 'propagate [a] partner narrative of regional prosperity and cooperation,'" the Post reports.
And those American officials were working to expand these operations further, advocating for creating an ominously-named "Information Fusion Center" to help coalition members "rapidly plan, execute, and assess operations in the information environment."
Arab states have put a lot of stock in the internet as a tool of domestic control. Many critics in the Regional Security Construct countries have been reportedly tortured—or even sentenced to death, in the case of Saudi Arabia—simply for posting on social media.
Despite knowing about the repression in Arab states, the U.S. government has been happy to teach them more effective online surveillance tactics.
In 2023, the U.S. State Department reported that Bahrain suffered from "serious restrictions on internet freedom," and that the authorities there considered opposing the monarchy to be a "terrorist act." The following year, the State Department trained Bahraini police on how to track "operations, recruiting, and disinformation" by "terrorists" on social media.
The State Department insisted to Reason at the time that the trainees would be "vetted for human rights violations in accordance with U.S. law" and that the U.S. "consistently raises human rights issues with senior Bahraini officials."
Publicly, CENTCOM admits to carrying out "military information support operations," including "countering disinformation," as part of "transregional cooperation to counter state and non-state actors posing a threat to U.S. interests." It insists that these operations are "implemented in accordance with U.S. public law and Department of War (DoW) policy guidance."
But other leaks suggest that U.S. propaganda operations in the Middle East are a lot more sinister than the "narrative of regional prosperity and cooperation" described in official documents. In 2022, The Intercept obtained internal documents from Twitter showing that CENTCOM was running fake accounts cheerleading the Saudi war effort in Yemen.
Rather than countering "disinformation," the U.S. military has been caught actively spreading it, including rumors about Iranian doctors stealing organs and Chinese vaccines being made with pork.
It's hard to tell exactly what kind of new information operations CENTCOM has in mind for the Regional Security Construct. The coalition is secretive by design. Documents obtained by the Post promised to keep the cooperation "in confidence" and warned that participants "MUST NOT" photograph meetings or allow access to journalists.
Worldwide, U.S. military propaganda efforts are a massive undertaking. The Defense Department is asking Congress for a military information support operations budget of over $209 million in FY 2026. It's safe to say that at least some of that money will make it easier for Middle Eastern dictators to control the information space.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
Reason helped deep state IC run psyops.
Muh private companies
Trump Russia
Kavanaugh/Ford
Impeachment
J6
Mostly peaceful but fiery, unmarked vans
Even now they keep pushing false stories on ICE.
I hear that antifa is just an idea.
Never heard of them.
It's more than an idea, it's a slogan. But that doesn't make it an organization. BTW, if you're not antifa, you are by definition pro-fa. Just so we all know where people are coming from.
Who's going to tell him?
No one is pro fascist except for perhaps the democrats as witnessed from their policies and actions.
Antifa are Anarcho terrorists, essentially grown children who are angry and need to have something constructive in their lives to focus on which will bring happiness.
"Reason helped deep state IC run psyops."
Reason is one cog in The Machine.
Well, as long as it was reported in the Washington Post - - - - -
Then we know it is total bullshit.
To be fair, we all know they're just reporting on this because the Bad Orange Man is in charge at the moment. But this shit has been going on for a LONG time in various forms.
This iteration they're talking about basically came about during Obama's term, in the wake of the "Arab Spring" color revolutions and subsequent efforts to counter ISIS through cyberwarfare by going after its digital funding lines and social media accounts.
The reason we're cuddling up a closer to Qatar is mainly due to that country's precarious geopolitical situation and the ongoing strategic situation in the Middle East. They share the Pars gas field with Iran, but aren't really in a position to leverage more access than what Iran is ultimately willing to grant. They've had an ongoing rivalry with Saudi Arabia and the UAE for a while, despite those countries all being in the Gulf Cooperation Council, as well as Egypt, which ramped up after the Arab Spring because the emir was letting members of the Muslim Brotherhood stay in the country (Hamas, incidentally, is a Muslim Brotherhood offshoot; that organization goes back over 100 years and is based around post-modern cultural marxism with Muslim characteristics. It's why so many Palestinians are communists and inevitably subvert any country that takes them in). We've had troops stationed in Qatar for a generation now, and by increasing their military cooperation with us, what we're clearly hoping to do here is both mitigate their conflicts with the other GCC nations while further isolating Iran.
While I get why they're doing this, personally I think it's a bad idea because you're potentially letting spies for Iran have access to a US military installation. Mountain Home is not as strategically important as, say, one of the Space Force bases, but you have to be really careful about letting in members of foreign countries in to your home bases, especially at scale. We've obviously done this for a long time because we train Middle Eastern pilots and other officers at our bases already, but this is a different level of cooperation that needs to be closely monitored. But with them allowing us on their bases for decades now, it's difficult to justify locking them out when there's a chance to bolster military and diplomatic relations with the country.
And I would point out that however authoritarian these states are they are not immune to public opinion. None of them want to deal with Palestinians in their countries but the "cause" is wildly popular. They are in a position that requires that they publicly support Hamas while actively undermining them. Left to a popular vote Israel would be wiped off the map. If the overarching goal is regional stability there will be all kinds of shenanigans. Not to defend the propaganda but this shit has been going on before any of us were born.
based around post-modern cultural marxism with Muslim characteristics.
Hahahaha. Okiedokie. Even chatgpt refused to rewrite that excerpt in a more gobbledy gook tone.
Maybe if you weren't using ChatGPT to do your thinking for you, and actually knew what the fuck you were talking about in any context, you could form something resembling other than your typical fagslop, JFart. But considering your track record, confidence in that prospect is about nil.
Democrats started it!
friends close, enemies closer.
Enemas really close.
Aenema best album ever?
Cool.
The US govt should not be sending any money to any other country.
If private people want to fund whatever wherever, indulge if you’d like.
The US govt should not be sending any money to any other country.
The math doesn't work that way. A reserve currency requires the export of money to 'the world'. It doesn't really much matter if that export is done through trade, through the US paying US soldiers on bases overseas, or whatever. It must happen because that's how double entry bookkeeping works.
Tell me when a libertarian actually understands this and deals with how to get from here to there. Until then, nonintervention is as meaningful as the Easter Bunny.
International trade in dollars can happen. Sending taxpayer money to govt X, no.
A reserve currency MUST export its currency. There is no individual 'remedy' or alternative. For the US, the only choice is - to be the reserve currency or to let someone/something else be the reserve currency. ALL the consequences re trade flows, currency value, taxes, debt, foreign intervention/spending, etc flow from that.
Just to give one example from the last few days. The US decided to impose a port tax on Chinese ships entering US ports. China has retaliated. That retaliation along with the rare earths one is why the stock market dropped on Friday.
One of the responsibilities that follow from being the reserve issuer is securing freedom of navigation. Many ways the US or another reserve issuer could do that but we always choose complete unilateralism. Which is also why the US, in this very article, is doing what we do in the Middle East unilaterally. Maybe Trump was hoping his port tax could simply force China to pay for a reserve issuer function - but China said nope. If there won't be Chinese ships on the oceans, then there won't be any US-owned ships either - but the US will still be doing global freedom of navigation.
As I said - non-interventionists need to understand this stuff in order to be taken seriously.
Your hypothesis is that the US govt must gift money to foreign nations for the house of cards to not topple? All trade ends if the US does steal taxpayer money/borrow to give money to Kiev and Tel Aviv?
I remember when you threw a tantrum because Trump surrendered to the Taliban and the Military Industrial Complex and NGOs money was about to dry up…poor Muzzies. 🙁
Just what the fuck world do you live in? Because it sure as fuck isn't reality.
Republicans threw a hissy fit when we got out of Afghanistan…what do you expect from the party of Cheney!
Ya know, lefty shitbag, I muted you a long time back since there was no use me piling on.
But sometimes I look to see what slimy pile of lying lefty shit is being handed their ass in a handbasket, and it is often you, slimy pile of lying pile of steaming pile of lying shit.
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Trump surrendered to the Taliban! And now he’s forced Netanyahu to stop eradicating Hamas! Strength through weakness!! #MAGA!
JFucked has a problem with reality; get that shit pile going on property taxes!
Bogus claims regarding issues from someone never dealing with the results.
An imbecilic lefty shit of the first order.
You need to understand there is no "must give free money to other countries" because the US dollar is the reserve currency.
In fact there is no necessity for trade either in the ways you describe.
And the reserve currency does not force America to police the seas. These are completely separate agreements and in fact all nations are together sharing the burden of securing the seas...
If we're not allowed to deal with dictatorships - that would eliminate every other country in the world.
Most of the time it would eliminate the US too.
"information operations to counter Iran's narrative that it is the regional protector of Palestinians and, according to a 2025 document, to 'propagate [a] partner narrative of regional prosperity and cooperation,'
How delusional can you get? Whatever the truth/fiction of Iran's narrative, on what planet is that going to be replaced by a 'partner narrative' of:
1. The US is a regional protector of the Palestinians
2. Israel is a regional protector of the Palestinians
3. Local Arab dictatorships are a regional protector of the Palestinians
4. No one is a regional protector of the Palestinians because Palestinians do not exist
5. Palestinians are a regional protector of the Palestinians once they are disarmed, subjugated, imprisoned, and concentrated in a camp somewhere where someone 'mows the lawn' whenever they 'need protection'.
1990 called, they want its scandal back. Literally, the USA has been doing this for at least 35 years if not longer. Why do you think we invaded Iraq the first time if not at the behest of Middle-Eastern dictators?
Yes, but TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!, TRUMP!.
Petti + WAPO = one huge steaming pile of TDS-addled lying shit.
Trump forced Netanyahu to stop killing Muzzies…apparently Qatar and Saudi Arabia don’t like it when Jews kill Muzzies. 😉
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
1500 Palestinian hostages released!! Thankies, Trump!!
Fuck off and die, shitstain
I mean 1900!! Thankies Trump!!!
How is this different from the old School of the Americas (just the most familiar of its names), in which US and Latin American military and police learned and taught counterinsurgency strategies and tactics? We know that torture was part of the curriculum and is featured in SOA training manuals. I'm not certain that SOA coursework explicitly included creation and functions of death squads. I am certain that SOA graduates took what they learned back home and created death squads in every Central and South American country that experienced asymmetric civil wars between, say, 1961 and 1990.
Via the SOA we supported Latin American dictators with money, weapons, training, and political cover, enabling some of the worst regimes to commit some of the worst human rights abuses. All this was explained and rationalized as necessary to defeat "communism" (which was always defined very broadly so as to include just about any anti-regime popular movements. This was not about the Monroe Doctrine, of course--it was about United Fruit and I.T.T. and "keepin' ol' Castro down."
I don't think we're allowed to believe that governments engage in psyops.
+1. 😉