Oregon Sues Trump Administration Over 'Unlawful' National Guard Federalization
The administration ordered the federalization of 200 Oregon National Guard members for 60 days, citing the same suspect legal authority used to send troops to California earlier this year.
President Donald Trump's efforts to be the "law and order" president could soon be ruled illegal. Oregon has filed suit against the Trump administration and is seeking a temporary restraining order to block the federalization of the state's National Guard members. The lawsuit, which was filed Sunday, comes one day after Trump announced he would federalize Oregon National Guard members and send them to Portland, Oregon.
"At the request of Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, I am directing Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, to provide all necessary Troops to protect war-ravaged Portland, and all of our [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] ICE facilities under siege from attack by Antifa, and other domestic terrorists," Trump posted on Truth Social on Saturday. "I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary." The decision comes after weeks of nightly protests in front of a Portland ICE facility.
In response, Hegseth issued a memorandum on Sunday ordering the federalization of 200 Oregon National Guard members "to protect [ICE] and other U.S. Government personnel…and to protect Federal property, at locations where protests against these functions are occurring or are likely to occur" for 60 days. "The memo cited the same legal authority that Trump used to send 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June," according to The Washington Post. A federal judge recently ruled that this deployment broke federal law, but left open the question of when a president can deploy military forces to protect federal property. Litigation in that case is still ongoing after the Trump administration appealed.
The order comes despite Oregon Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek's opposition. "When the president and I spoke…I told him in plain language that there is no insurrection or threat to public safety that necessitates military intervention in Portland or any other city in our state," Kotek said in a statement. "Despite this—and all evidence to the contrary—he has chosen to disregard Oregonians' safety and ability to govern ourselves," she continued. "This is not necessary. And it is unlawful. And it will make Oregonians less safe."
The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, argues that Hegseth's memo is patently unlawful. Under federal law, the president can only federalize National Guard members "in circumstances involving a foreign nation's 'invasion,' an outright 'rebellion,' or where the President has been 'unable with regular forces' to execute Federal Law through ordinary means," according to the complaint. Should one of those circumstances occur, "the President 'shall' issue any orders to a National Guard 'through' that state's governor." Plaintiffs assert there is no such invasion, rebellion, or inability to execute federal law, and local law enforcement remains equipped to monitor and respond to "the small ongoing ICE-facility protests."
The complaint also argues that the Trump administration is in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids the use of the military for law enforcement purposes, "except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress."
The order may also violate the 10th Amendment, which is meant to balance the power between the state and federal governments. Generally, powers not delegated to the federal government by the Constitution are reserved to the states, "including the authority to promote safety at protests and deter violent crime," according to the complaint.
"Oregon communities are stable, and our local officials have been clear: we have the capacity to manage public safety without federal interference," Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a statement. "What we're seeing is not about public safety, it's about the President flexing political muscle under the guise of law and order, chasing a media hit at the expense of our community."
The federalization of Oregon's National Guard members is just Trump's newest attempt at becoming, as Reason's Jacob Sullum put it, a "nationwide crime fighter," despite strong limitations on the federal government's police powers to address local crime. Just as Los Angeles before it, the use of troops to police Portland could soon be ruled illegal by a judge. In the meantime, Trump is moving forward with plans to send troops and federal agents to major cities around the country, and redefining the presidency to mean he has "the right to do anything [he wants] to do."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
>>Just as Los Angeles before it, the use of troops to police Portland could soon be ruled illegal by a judge.
you know more happened after that yes?
She does not.
Reason writers cant learn.
This is actually amazing how Autumn could be this ignorant on a topic she’s writing on, and even more amazing it would actually get published. Reason has become a complete fucking joke.
“Supreme Court Hands Donald Trump New Win”
https://www.newsweek.com/supreme-court-ice-raids-los-angeles-trump-noem-2126452
Hey now! She’s an assistant to the editor at Reason. So totally knowledgeable.
I wonder what the editor needs assistance with..? Spelling?
The locals can be freed up from their “law enforcement” activities and perhaps work on cleaning up all the human feces being deposited in public spaces in shithole Portland.
Trump posted on Truth Social on Saturday. "I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary."
A Full Force Police state conservative heaven!
https://psychcentral.com/disorders/treating-pedophilia#aversion-therapy
Yep, as a Libertarian nothing gets me hard like troops in the street.
Does that include your SS antifa troops?
Troops in the street is authoritarian, the opposite of Libertarian. Maybe you're being sarcastic about being libertarian.
The security of Federal property, like ICE facilities, if not adequately maintained by local law enforcement, needs Federal intervention. Who else will protect Federal employees if local law enforcement refuses? A similar question to who would enforce Brown vs. Board of Ed in the 60s. Oh, that's right, it's the Bad Orange Man. Again.
In D.C., the most arrests were for carrying weapons, and alcohol. I suspect a lot more conservatives are going to be arrested than liberals.
The governor of Oregon needs to tell Trump that he can not use their NG and order the NG not to comply with any orders from Washington.
Like autumn, youre incapable of education.
It is part of a false flag. You’ll see.
Trump should order the NG to arrest that POS for a Governor, DA Mike Schmidt and mayor of Portland.
Trump should declare Portland a disaster area.
That is, what's left of Portland that's worth anything, that hasn't been burned down.
The all-hail-a-police-state wing of libertarians (aka Rothbard and the alt-right crowd) are giddy.
Like sarc. Youre retarded. Could save yourself grief by reading the order dumdum. But like autumn and Tony, youre a retard. They are there to protect federal buildings and agents.
When the other option is a crime-lidden anarchy where punishment is VERY much political --- it is the better option.
Neither are good.
Portland has arrested nobody for anything, including noise complaints, near the ICE facility in over 3 months. Not one person.
Democrats today are no different from Democrats of the Civil Rights era south, just a new target they want murdered.
They almost seem to be cribbing off the complaints of white supremacists "states rights" officials who didn't want federalized Guards assisting little Black kids to integrate schools.
Well, those guys were Democrats too, so not a stretch.
Especially young white women like the one that was murdered by a jogger with 25 felonies and let out on the streets. BTW the jogger who murdered that young woman was only 30.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/you-pissed-wrong-daddy-father-murder-victim-unloads-dems-soft-crime-policies
The shortsightedness of this administration is insane.
When Democrats do what Trump has been doing....
Like when they did it after J6? In New Mexico?
Are you just that fucking ignorant? It happens often.
Conservatives also aren't attacking federal agents and buildings Rachel.
But then it will be ok because Republicans did it first!
Yeehaaa!
The difference, of course, being that Democrats will go after citizens for constitutionally protected rights.
Of course, none of this would even be remotely thought of as necessary if all the Democrats who’ve said the same things Trump does (in regards to immigration) had actual followed through on their words.
Wasn't the CA mobilization ruled legal though?
Figures, the article, of course, fails to address this.
There should be no article because of the ruling but being willfully ignorant seems to have it's privledges for Reason.
there is no ... threat to public safety that necessitates military intervention
"Now we're merely haggling over the price."
Ice Cube's tour bus was firebombed while he was in Portland for a performance. ANTIFA have become scared now, removing all online presence.
So the only explanation of why he feels the action is necessary is a short quote from Trump. The entire article is spent trying to discredit the man and fails to share the actual news of what is happening. You can't honestly present the news if you're only reporting on a response and not the initial provocation.
It's not unlawful for federal forces to enforce federal law.
That's the only weight this BS carries with it; what law is being enforced.
With the big-fat topic paint brush being used it sounds just like 'disarm the police' lobbying.
Oregon State legislators and cities have had many years to stop encouraging and end this violent illegal behavior.
Since the authorities who have jurisdiction over law enforcement in Oregon have failed to protect US citizens and property the Federal government is lawfully and rightfully stepping in.
In the next few days the innocent people will begin to be thankful and praise the actions making them safer, even if it is under their breath for fear of reprisal by lunatic leftists bent on violence.
Portland rioters sieged a federal courthouse for over 3 months during the "Summer of Love". They have had a LONG time to fix this --- but the votes have decided to side with antifa.
As I always say --- the mob eventually got Robespierre.
Oregon is run by violent leftists aka Democrats. Trump should use the NG to clean out the cess pool of what passes for government in that state.
Charge the governor and his lackeys for treason. Arrest the mayor of Portland and have him executed. Clean out every single POS ANTIFA by whatever means necessary.
Before anyone screams about democracy, what sort of democracy allows unbridled violence and crime?
If Trump can get antifa on the international terrorism list, I think Portland and Seattle will have large problems.
Oregon Governor Tiny Kotex has turned into Keith Olbermann, probably sounds like him too, in her latest lesbian rant against decency, society and safety but mainly against Trump.
She would rather have her ANTIFA terrorists doing what they do best: terrorizing cities by setting them on fire and terrorizing the hapless populace within who don't dare defend themselves as they would charged as a criminal intent.
Way to go Oregon, you should have closed the border to any and all Californians who squirmed and snuck their way in and ruined your state.
Federalizing the NG is acceptable to protect federal people and assets when local law enforcement fails. Withhold funds from the state for failing.
Do not use the NG or any federal police for state and local law enforcement. Oregon voted for crime. Let Oregon deal with it