Trump's Tariff Spin Is Putting Republicans in an Awkward Spot
Should they brag about raising taxes, like the White House is doing, or try to distance themselves from those same tax increases?

The Trump administration's strategy of bragging about a huge surge in tariff revenue is creating some obvious and uncomfortable questions for other Republican politicians.
Like, hey, where is all that money coming from?
In a viral video, Rep. Barry Moore (R–Ala.) is seen struggling to deliver a straight answer to that question at a town hall in Alabama this week.
"Who pays the tariff? Is it consumers or is it the exporting country?" asks an attendee at the event. In response, Moore launches into a line about inflation—before being quickly shouted down by the audience for dodging the question.
"Who pays the tariff?" the crown begins chanting. "Who pays the tariff? Who pays the tariff?"
Again, Moore tries to pivot away with a non sequitur about the Marshall Plan and the efforts to rebuild Europe after World War II. (Notably, the Marshall Plan helped lay the groundwork for reducing tariffs, as policymakers recognized how high tariffs played a significant role in the economic and geopolitical problems of the 1930s.)
The crowd does not relent. Eventually, to his credit, Moore does try to address the question. "You're not paying anything on the tariffs," he says, before claiming that shipping companies are covering the added cost. The crowd does not seem particularly satisfied with that answer.
The truth is that President Donald Trump's tariff hikes are hitting Americans in all sorts of ways. Some importers and other businesses are trying to eat the added cost of those taxes (which shows up in the form of reduced profits), while others are passing the tax along the supply chain. The tariffs are also discouraging investments, disrupting international mail services, and causing chaos in various markets.
While the exact contours of the tariffs' impact might take many forms, the cost is ultimately borne by people—just like with any tax. The Yale Budget Lab estimates that the average American household will pay approximately $2,400 in tariff costs this year. That won't show up as a lump sum like a property tax bill or be easily seen like the income tax withholdings on your pay stub, but the costs are still real, even if they are less obviously seen.
Republicans in Congress, like Moore, had nothing to do with these new tariffs, which have been implemented unilaterally by Trump under the constitutionally dubious claim that he's responding to an economic emergency. With a few exceptions, most Republicans have been unwilling to criticize the president for the tariffs—or much else—and seem entirely disinterested in doing anything to block or reduce them.
That's despite the fact that the tariffs remain unpopular with the public. In a Pew Research Center poll earlier this month, majorities said that Trump's tariffs would be "mostly negative" for both the country and their own families. About six in 10 respondents said they disapproved of the tariffs.
Meanwhile, Gallup's monthly tracking poll shows that Trump's approval rating on the economy has slid from 42 percent in February to 37 percent in August.
But perhaps the most relevant poll on this topic is one conducted all the way back in February by the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University. In that survey, 58 percent of respondents said domestic businesses and consumers paid the cost of tariffs, while 42 percent said the costs fell on foreign governments or businesses based in other countries. Among those who believed it was foreigners paying for the tariffs, 51 percent supported raising tariffs.
It is that group of Americans who are the target of the Trump administration's messaging on tariffs, which assumes that higher tax revenue is something to be cheered as long as someone else is footing the bill.
How long that point of view can hold out against a continuous assault of economic reality remains to be seen. Inflation has ticked upward in recent months, and rising prices at the wholesale level suggest that worse could be on the way. American companies like John Deere and Ford are facing slumping sales and lower profits due to the tariffs. In all, the notion that foreign countries and corporations are bearing the brunt of the trade war seems fragile at best (and an outright lie at worst).
That leaves Republicans like Moore, who is running for Senate next year, in a tricky spot. Should they go along with the White House's plan to celebrate a massive tax increase that was imposed on their constituents without so much as a congressional hearing, much less a vote? Or should they try to ignore the obvious consequences of Trump's tariff policies, even as those same constituents get angry about rising prices?
Moore's town hall this week demonstrates the limited viability of the second option. How long before Republicans simply have to admit the obvious and blame Trump for raising their constituents' taxes?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
EB;dr the wishcasting
EB; dr
Waiting for sarc to tell us how right EB is.
Willfully ignorant and proud of it. I bet your mom is impressed.
Was your mom impressed when her granddaughter needed to call CPS on her son?
You’re a retarded homeless drunk that can’t grasp simple words and phrases. So who are you to denigrate anyone?
Is he using a lot of maybe or could phrasing that ends up being wrong every time?
Are you still pretending you don't know that tariffs are domestic taxes on Americans, paid by Americans? I guess it figures. You'd lose your street T-cred if you ever admitted Trump was an economic ignoramus, so you just go with the flow and pretend you're an economic ignoramus too.
Tax Incidence
Your evasions grow stronger as the economy gets weaker.
*There* it is. There. And not so wounded as we were led to believe.
Right on time Boehm gives us another 'Trump is destroying the economy' article.
'Raised taxes' - on foreigners so far.
If Moore (and Boehm) were on their feet he would have been able to explain tax incidence to them.
Owners pay in the form of lower profits.
Employees pay in the form of lower compensation.
Customers pay in the form of higher prices.
We're not seeing higher prices - thus the Owners and Employees are paying the tariffs.
Raised taxes on foreigners? Tariffs are domestic taxes.
Only to the extent they are passed on down the supply chain. That is not 100% of the time no matter how often you declare it so.
We're not seeing higher prices - thus the Owners and Employees are paying the tariffs.
You'll see.
I mean, I hope not.
We're not seeing higher prices - thus the Owners and Employees are paying the tariffs.
"I'm not seeing higher prices.
"People who own stock in the company are losing money, and employees are getting let go and missing raises. Effected companies are losing value. Unemployment is going up and wages are stagnating."
"But I'm not seeing higher prices."
"That means Trump's tariffs are pure profit!!!!!"
Pure retardation. Like, distilled retardation.
Ford failing because of their EV push and the prior administration controls of auto manufacturing is not because of Trump's tariffs?
Can you show the drop in Ford the day of or the day after the first tariffs were applied but that Ford was doing just fine prior to this day?
Come on be honest. You are putting the spin out for what reason? It must be more than TDS at this point.
Wow. It is almost like there was a reason the frames gave Congress alone the power to impose taxes.
Republicans in Congress, like Moore, had nothing to do with these new tariffs
Hard disagree. Those weak-as-milk betas dodged every opportunity to remove this power from the president or end the "emergency." Credit to Rand Paul and Thomas Massie for having spines.
Congress really is chock-full of absolute cowards. But we know that politicians are (almost) always self-serving, so it's not a surprise. Just disappointing.
All true.
What an ignorant article. Trump's tariffs are not taxes. No, they're not. Well, actually they are. But Americans don't pay them. Tariffs on China are tariffs on China. So China pays them. Except that they don't. Importers pay them. But those importers can just eat the cost. They can cut back on profits or labor or something, but they won't raise prices. Unless the tariffs are so high that they can't eat the cost. Then they'll have to raise prices and pass the cost along to the consumer. That means... look over there! A Democrat! Let's get 'em! He probably voted for Harris! Let's skin the sonofabitch!
Should they brag about raising taxes, like the White House is doing, or try to distance themselves from those same tax increases?
Does it matter? They are running against dead people. Sprinting speed is probably not the highest bar.
Eric Boehm: "I'm posting an anti-tariff article on Reason today."
Squidward: "Daring today."
Look at that! Sarcs stuffed straw-man on headline news.
Sorry. I just don't buy that there is any amount of real people that don't know what a Tariff is. Leftard made straw-men? Sure. Those kinds are all over the place.
Trump's Tariff Spin
TRUMP'S tariff spin?
You have literally spent the last year spinning this overtly BS lie that "tariffs = taxes." They do not. They never have, and they never will. The only people who thing that are economic simpletons who are intentionally ignoring the difference to instead pretend it's all just one big cost burden on Joe Everyman.
It's not. Taxes are about generating revenue. They target citizens directly. Tariffs are about market costs and foreign policy. They target foreign goods. You liars equating them are ignoring that fact and dismissing the subject only as an issue of an effect on consumer prices.
It's stupid, and you're stupid for saying it. It's like saying that a clothesline and a dryer are the same thing simply because they both get your clothes dry.
And you want the dryer because it's "better" than the clothesline.
But it's only "better" (ie: cheaper) because it can rely on power (aka labor abuses, including but not limited to child labor, sweatshops, and slavery) which the clothesline can not hope to compete with. And that's the part you "libertarians" intentionally omit, to instead whine that a tariff against labor abusing nations makes it harder to dry your clothes.
Which means one of two things: 1) you're angry that America doesn't use child labor, sweatshops, and slavery to produce cheaper goods; or 2) you're angry that your goods made by child labor, sweatshops, and slavery come with a import surcharge.
Either way, at the end of the day, you just want child labor, sweatshops, and slavery.
And that's why the divide on the subject falls along fairly standard partisan lines. Because we all know there's one party that's been pro-slavery since the beginning, and it ain't the one with the elephant.
Yep, just look at all those children laboring in sweatshops and slavery up there in our northern neighbor.
Just look at all those adults laboring in sweatshops and slavery HERE for the [WE] want ?free? ponies gang and getting no-where.
FTFYB
Oh, I'm sorry, did you instead want to talk about the drug pipeline they facilitate?
Or maybe you'd like to talk about how Canada is lol "taxing" their citizens to prevent the Chicoms from steel dumping and how "that's different" from American tariffs?