What If TikTok Therapists Are Making People Less Happy?
Lena Dunham's new show is a send-up of internet therapy culture.

Lena Dunham's new Netflix show Too Much is a rom-com for the TikTok-scrolling, influencer-besotted age. In the show, 30-something Jessica relocates to London after a thunderous breakup that causes her to go a little insane. While Jessica is the kind of frumpy, childish mess familiar to fans of Dunham's other work, she also immediately meets and falls in love with an astoundingly handsome indie musician named Felix. The show chiefly concerns the pair's lighting-fast courtship. In one episode, Felix tags along to Jessica's chaotic work party. In another, she's his plus-one at a farcically posh British wedding. There's a lot of sex, a decent amount of drugs, and—seeing that Felix is a musician—some rock and roll as well. A consistent theme is that Jessica runs too hot—she's too much, as the title suggests—and Felix runs too cold. He's emotionally distant and hard to read, while Jessica is an open book.
However, while Too Much ends up being an overstuffed if eminently bingeable rom-com, the most interesting moments come not from the main characters, but from Jessica's ex-boyfriend, Zev.
While Zev at first seems like a victim of Jessica's obsession (we meet him after she's literally broken into his house), he's eventually revealed to be a jerk of a now-familiar type: the therapy boyfriend. Using the pseudo-intellectual language of therapy, Zev sanitizes meanness and neglect. When Jessica (reasonably) feels insecure, he tells her that she "can't always ask for constant reassurance," adding that she should "maybe see a therapist, 'cause it's actually really selfish of you not to let go of this anxious attachment style." In a therapy session after their breakup, he compares Jessica to his overbearing mother, casting himself as the victim of her overwhelming, suffocating demands for affection.
"The first thing I smell, before I see it, before I hear it, is a girl in need of that kind of love," he says. "And for a moment, I'm her knight in shining armor, but little by slowly, she starts to hate me."
And sure, Jessica is a stereotypical "high-maintenance" woman. She's needy, she's intense, but she's no succubus. What makes Zev's treatment of Jessica—and later his new girlfriend, Wendy—so frustrating is his ability to cast his meanness in the language of therapy. As Wendy later tells Jessica, "He chooses strong women just to tear us down."
His fixation with attachment theory in particular reads as a send-up of online therapy culture. Over the past few years, online therapy culture has helped turn attachment theory from a dry, academic concept into a wide-ranging explanation for just about every relational problem. On TikTok the hashtag #anxiousattachment has nearly 140,000 posts.
In its original context, attachment theory referred to an attachment between a parent and child. Contemporary attachment labels like anxious and avoidant attachment come from research done by psychologist Mary Ainsworth in the 1970s. In her experiments, she observed how infants behaved in a battery of mildly disruptive situations—like meeting a stranger or being left alone. Ainsworth observed that while some children (whom she called "securely" attached) could be easily comforted after these disruptions, other children reacted strangely. Some, whom she called "ambivalently" attached (though most influencers call this "anxious" attachment), were clingy and could not be easily calmed after their parents returned. Others, the "avoidantly" attached, never got upset in the first place. Still other children exhibited behaviors that were difficult to categorize.
Over the intervening decades, what began as an academic theory to explain child-parent relationships has now become an all-purpose explanation for just about any interpersonal struggle. Do you need reassurance or fear people dislike you? You're probably anxiously attached. Do you struggle to commit and often feel smothered by your partner's affection? That's avoidant attachment.
Jessica probably isn't anxiously attached in any manner but the pop-psych sense. Sure, she's a bit nuts, but in ways that have more to do with Dunham-ian neuroticism than with a childhood trauma–adjacent attachment disorder. If any character in the show has a legitimate case of attachment issues, it's Felix, who was genuinely neglected by his parents and abused by the nanny who cared for him during their long absences.
Mostly, Jessica just wants to be loved. However, this, too, is a sign of attachment issues according to some therapy influencers. If you feel clingy, if you expect your boyfriend to tell you he loves you or respond to your texts, that's a sign that something is wrong with you. Well-adjusted people, mentally healthy people, are supposed to be fulfilled by nothing but their own company.
When watching videos about anxious attachment in particular, it's hard not to feel like so many of the problems these influencers identify are just normal. The feelings of insecurity these influencers describe will be familiar to anyone who's had their heart broken.
"When you feel them pulling away, you're waiting on communication, you feel them becoming inconsistent, you can sense the change in their energy toward you, it can feel intense. It feels like you had some love and attention, and it's now being taken away," says one influencer in a video about anxious attachment with more than 30,000 likes. She assures her viewers that, when they feel worried, "In that moment, you are not thinking clearly. What this is doing is activating a past wound."
Like many therapy-culture ideas, there's probably a sliver of truth to what many of these influencers are saying. There are some people who are overcome with anxiety about their partners in a way that is ultimately unhealthy. But these messages end up providing easy cover to cast real problems—even your partner being a real jerk—as the irrational hallucinations of attachment issues.
Most of the time, if you feel something is amiss in your relationship, it probably is. While claiming to help people better understand themselves and their relationships, therapy-culture influencers end up making it even harder to know what's real and what's anxiety. Sometimes, if you're feeling insecure, if you're constantly worried your partner no longer loves you, you don't have attachment issues—you're accurately perceiving that you're about to be dumped. In those situations, becoming obsessed with attachment often feels like a kind of self-directed brainwashing. Therapy culture may bill itself as a way to bring therapeutic clarity to the masses, but actually creating healthier relationships—as Jessica herself eventually learns—sometimes means putting your phone down.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
If you are dependant on TikTok therapy youre a really stupid person.
Which season will there be A very special rapefugee episode?
I mean full stop on Lena Dunham but also no therapist makes a person happy if you're at a therapist seeking happiness run.
Lena Dunham is a full on cheeseburger walrus now.
I thought that was the world's largest potato.
Meanwhile in an obvious attempt to distract from the Epstein story the DOJ just dumped the Maxwell interview audio and transcript. Liz warned us that the walls were closing in and it looks like she was right.
Bondi also sent most of the DoJ materials to congress.
And Comer says they'll be released to the public.
This is the democrats next big plan to win back their shrinking pool of voters…..
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/22/nolte-no-more-birthing-person-lgbtqia-fractured-dems-instructed-talk-like-normal-people/
FTA:
Talking points are out instructing Democrats to stop using terms like “birthing person” and “LGBTQIA+” and to begin talking again like Normal People.
First the details, then I’ll get to why this is so glorious…
The Third Way, a leftist think tank that poses as moderate, released a memo Thursday calling on Democrats “Who Wish to Stop Donald Trump and MAGA” to stop using “words and phrases no ordinary person would ever dream of saying.”
The Third Way’s blacklist is broken down into six categories:
Therapy-speak
Seminar Room Language
Organizer Jargon
Gender/Orientation Correctness
The Shifting Language of Racial Constructs
Explaining Away Crime
It’s beyond me why it’s not all under the category of “Orwellian Bullshit.”
And here’s a taste of the blacklisted terms, along with my interpretation of what they really mean:
incarcerated people [thugs]
justice-involved [thug]
dialoguing [chat]
triggering [telling a truth]
microaggression [offending a thin-skinned fascist]
body shaming [funny fat jokes]
subverting norms [behaving like a Democrat]
systems of oppression [opposing merit]
cultural appropriation [eating with chopsticks while you watch Super Fly TNT and your kids run around in sombreros playing Cowboys and Indians]
the unhoused [smelly homeless people]
food insecurity [coming up short at the end of the month because you wasted your food stamps on Entenmann’s and Dr. Pepper]
housing insecurity [about to be a smelly homeless person because you bought weed and Entemann’s before paying the rent]
person who immigrated [foreigner]
birthing person [woman]
pregnant people [women who are pregnant]
cisgender [normal person]
deadnaming [he’ll always be Bruce Jenner to me]
heteronormative [no one really knows what this means]
BIPOC [the minorities]
LGBTQIA+ [the gays and whatever]
involuntary confinement [justice]
I don’t think these idiots can manage any of that. But it’s going to be funny to watch them try. Maybe it will work better than all the recent ‘tough talk’.
heteronormative [no one really knows what this means]
It means treating normal things like they are normal.
I suspect this is too little too late. The people who used to be working class democrats have largely switched to MAGA (which is hard to distinguish from working class Democrats from the 80s).
They got sick of being screwed over by the increasingly Marxist democrats who were killing their union jobs, creating massive inflation, and introducing third world levels of blight on. Their communities. I suspect the final straw was when the democrats stepped over these increasingly discontented people and replacing them as a voting block with tens of millions of illegals.
Democrats think their problem is how they message. When it is really the underlying message no one likes. And instead of changing, they triple down on hat no one likes. Which kinds of reminds me of an old Key and Peel sketch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXVEY-gj_3w
Thanks for the reference guide. Jeff might get triggered by the Entenmann’s shaming.
What if the TT therapists are making people less happy?
I don't know, they lose viewers and go away?
Millennial is the New Boomer.
I'm hoping to see the ENB/Emma Camp dance-off Oxford debate: Social Media is actually making us more well adjusted* with ENB taking the positive and Camp taking the negative.
*based on my Freudian analysis of ENB's social media articles over the last few years, it seems clear that social media is making her increasingly unhappy, essentially leaving her with a sense of ennui and existential angst. We went from "Twitter is implooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooding" to "Try Mastodon! (takes bite, winces, looks at camera) It's... great..." to "I now use Bluesky and will only be linking BS "tweets" in my articles" (I've personally yet to see a linked bluesky 'tweet' in a single article she's written) to "Maybe we should try to just put the damned phones down".
As Wendy later tells Jessica, "He chooses strong women just to tear us down."
The way you described Jessica in no way conveys the idea of "a strong woman."
Women often have a gap between their physical attractiveness and their mental attractiveness. Emily Ratajkowski might have the largest such gap in the history of mankind. Personkind.
So, what part of the libertarian diaspora is interested in Lena Dunham, Tick Tock, Therapy, or Zoomer psychological issues?
Multiples of shit that's not libertarian don't make it a more libertarian topic.
Fucking Teen Reason. And this chick is the definition of overly online. Camp needs to put down her phone, replace her vertical driver's license, and go out someplace not in DC where she can have a drink and talk with normal people about normal things.
She also needs to stop writing here. She's a bad fit for a "libertarian" magazine.