Video Shows Immigration Officers Shooting at a San Bernardino Family's Car. DHS Calls It Justified.
CBP officers said they acted in self-defense when the driver fled the scene, but passengers believe video evidence shows they were the real victims.

A recent immigration stop in San Bernardino, California, ended with three gunshots from federal officers after the driver fled the scene in his vehicle. While the Department of Homeland Security claims that the officers acted in self-defense after the driver struck two agents, the passengers believe footage of the altercation reveals that it was the passengers, not the officers, who were the victims.
On Saturday morning, Francisco, an undocumented immigrant who has been in the U.S. for 23 years, and his 18-year-old son and 23-year-old son-in-law—who are both U.S. citizens—were returning home when unmarked vehicles surrounded their truck. The recordings of the incident begin with four officers—armed, masked, and dressed in street clothes with black vests with the word "police"—surrounding the car. One officer had a black baseball cap with "CBP" across the front, presumably for "Customs and Border Protection." The passengers can be heard asking the officers, "What do you want?" and asking why the officers pulled them over, as an agent yells, "Francisco! Roll down the window!"
Francisco tells his son, in Spanish, "Don't open [the door]," and shakes his head, signaling "no" to the agents. In response, two officers shatter both of the truck's front windows—a tactic that has become increasingly common among federal immigration officials since President Donald Trump took office. One agent immediately reaches through the broken driver's side window and attempts to grab Francisco before the vehicle takes off. As Francisco drives away, three gunshots ring out. The last video clip shows the truck's smashed glass windows and at least two bullet holes on the back passenger side door. No one was wounded by the gunfire.
After the incident, Francisco called and "reported that masked men had pulled him over, broke his car window and shot at him," according to a statement by the San Bernardino Police Department to ABC News. Police officers spoke with Francisco at his home but released him from custody due to a California law prohibiting them from assisting in federal immigration enforcement.
Federal officers also arrived at the family's home and remained there for five or six hours but were not allowed to enter without a warrant. Among the agents was the officer the family believes shot at the truck. But when he was confronted about the gunfire, he said, "I didn't shoot. I tapped your window three times," according to the family.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) called the CBP officers' actions self-defense and criticized the local police for not taking Francisco into custody after he "struck two CBP officers with his vehicle," injuring two officers, according to CNN. "This decision was made despite the subject refusing to comply and wounding two officers—another terrible example of California's pro-sanctuary policies in action that shield criminals instead of protecting communities," DHS told CNN in a statement. The department has not released details of how or where the officers were struck.
Art Acevedo, a former police chief in Houston and Miami, told the Los Angeles Times that "many law enforcement agencies revised departmental policies and generally prohibited shooting at moving vehicles and officers from standing in the path of a vehicle." However, a moving vehicle can be considered a safety-threatening weapon. Under the DHS use-of-force policies, deadly force is prohibited from being used against fleeing subjects but is permitted if the officer has a "reasonable belief that the subject poses a significant threat of death or serious physical harm" and "such force is necessary to prevent escape." Officers are also generally prohibited from discharging firearms to disable vehicles or firing warning shots at a moving vehicle to initiate compliance.
"The family wants an investigation, they want to clear their name, that they didn't run anyone over," Javier Hernandez, executive director of the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice, told the L.A. Times on behalf of Francisco and his family. According to Hernandez, Francisco is unsure why immigration officers—who DHS said were conducting a targeted enforcement operation, which is why agents knew his name—stopped him, as he has no criminal record. However, Hernandez said that deportation proceedings against Francisco may have been triggered after he began seeking legal immigration status, but gave up because the process required him to leave the country for a period of time.
Since January, the Trump administration has deployed many controversial tactics—including masked, roving patrols of immigration officers using and detaining a record number of immigration detainees amid overcrowding concerns—to meet its goal of 1 million deportations per year. While use of firearms by CBP officers against subjects is a relatively rare occurrence—with only 20 and 18 incidents reported in FY 2022 and FY 2023, respectively—it's possible that the San Bernardino incident could mark the beginning of a new escalation of force used by the Trump administration to meet its mass deportation goals.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Trump and His Trumpaloos and ICE BrownShits are raiding all of the BLUE cities and states! Make all of the libs cry; ruin their economies by taking away many of their hard workers! THAT will show them to vote "Team D"! Do SNOT raid the farmers and THEIR hard workers in the RED states, 'cause they (farmers) vote for MEEEEE!!!
https://abc6onyourside.com/news/nation-world/heres-how-ice-immigration-and-customs-enforcement-arrests-differ-between-red-and-blue-states-cincinnati-sanctuary-policies-local-enforcement-laws-president-united-american-immigration-officials-bill-reconciliation-budget-detentions-administration Here's how ICE arrests differ between red and blue states, according to data From there, “In Republican-leaning states, 59% of ICE arrests occur in prisons and jails. Conversely, in Democratic-leaning states, ICE is more likely to arrest immigrants from the community, with 70% of arrests taking place at worksites, streets, and during mass roundups.”
That couldn’t have anything to do with the disparity between red and blue states actually locking up illegal immigrants that committed a crime, could it?
That couldn’t have anything to do with Trump wanting to make the liberals cry, while SNOT making the red states cry, now, could shit?
Also see how often ICE raids the maids at all the fancy Trump hotels, and raids the caddies at Trump golf courses, where the rich people go to grease the palms of the Donald!
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-undocumented-immigrants-tower-demolish-724845
President Trump Hired Undocumented Immigrants for $4 An Hour for Demolition Project: Court Docs
I also think I recall reading that he flat-out RIPPED OFF (didn't pay promised wages) at His construction projects, I think the workers were illegal sub-humans from Poland. If I found that for you, would you change your mind about ANYTHING?
But shooting an unarmed woman in the face is ok!
/retarded Trump defenders
You mean the traitor Babbitt who was violently attacking the House of Representatives?
Seek help.
""violently attacking the House of Representatives""
Attacking with what? Sholder fired missile? Drone? Small arms? Hand to hand combat? Strong verbal language?
She might have been carrying a strongly worded letter on her person.
"Art Acevedo, a former police chief in Houston and Miami"
Oh yeah, I remember him. That's who you go to for police comments, the twice-disgraced police chief who was shocked, shocked, to find a veteran cop had been committing perjury on search warrants for years, pocketing money for non-existent informants, and lying about it all?
Autumn Billings, your credibility was already shot by your miscoverage of Alligator Alcatraz. Do you really think quoting Art Acevedo is going to help resuscitate your reputation?
History!
https://reason.com/2024/01/25/5-years-after-a-deadly-drug-raid-houstons-former-police-chief-might-finally-be-held-accountable/
She doesn’t care.
Yeah she could just search Reason for Acevedo but didn't bother.
I want to know how this guy keeps getting new jobs. Like, who is desperate enough to hire Art Acevedo of all people to be a police officer in their town?
"San Bernadino Man" is the new "Maryland Man", eh?
It is well settled law that the initial attacker in a confrontation can not claim self-defense. These thugs shot up a car with innocent people.
It's well-established law that pulling away from a stop with law enforcement, while the officers are on foot next to your car, and / or in contact with it or partially inside of it, is assault with a deadly weapon.
That is quite false.
It is not.
In fact, an officer intentionally putting himself in harms way and then claiming fear for life is quite controversial and banned in some states, but not others. Most states won't commit , and leave it in the air as officer discretion.
You find a violent reaction to an attempted arrest to be the officer's fault? Fuck off with your criminal centric narrative.
The job of police is to attack people. It's what they do. So that does not apply.
Which is why liberal cities that reduced crime did an about face on defund the police.
What? No where is it the job of the police to attack people, unless you live in Trump's fascist mind.
Sure it is. Their job is to enforce compliance. They are explicitly trained to initiate force if someone fails to obey, and to escalate if they continue to disobey. And ultimately kill them if they fight back. Every interaction with the police is a potentially deadly encounter. Try not doing what they say and fighting back. You'll find yourself injured or dead.
Don't forget the courts are of the general opinion that at an encounter is not the time or place to enforce your rights; you are supposed to allow the boot to be properly applied to your neck and hope that in months to years in the future, a court may deem you might have had a point before letting the officers off with no admission of wrong doing.
I believe ICE agents currently carry P320s so…
Tapping on the window three times shouldn't leave bullets or bullet holes in the car. Seems that this should be easy to figure out.
How about trying to run over people? Did you ignore that for some reason?
Sorry Autumn, but they're hanging around a criminal who then tried to murder a couple of people in order to evade capture.
Are they victims? Sure. They also put themselves in that position.
>presumably for "Customs and Border Protection."
Seriously? YOU wrote this sentence?
> Francisco is unsure why immigration officers—who DHS said were conducting a targeted enforcement operation, which is why agents knew his name—stopped him, as he has no criminal record. However, Hernandez said that deportation proceedings against Francisco may have been triggered after he began seeking legal immigration status, but gave up because the process required him to leave the country for a period of time.
In other words, he has a criminal record AND HE KNOWS WHY THEY CAME AFTER HIM.
FFS Billings, did you just expect no one would read that far down?
Yeah that's my take here. He knew he didn't have legal status and decades after entry initiated proceedings. But instead of finishing the process by self deporting for the required period he decided to continue his illegal status. It strains credulity that he didn't know who was pulling him over. He knew he was illegal. He knew he was on the radar screen. They called him by name. He made the decision to not cooperate. He made the decision to put the pedal down. Looks to me like his claim that he was surrounded by a bunch of armed thugs for no reason is a pathetic attempt to delay his well deserved deportation. And he might succeed in the short term but nothing the cops did changes his illegal status. If he had any sense he'd GTFO now if he still can.
>controversial tactics—including masked, roving patrols of immigration officers using
'Roving patrols' are controversial? How else do you patrol Billings?
>amid overcrowding concerns
Thanks to Biden.
No one is above the law Autumn.