CBP Is Deporting Cruise Ship Crew Over Child Pornography Allegations Without Evidence
Advocacy groups say more than 100 cruise ship crew members have been deported in recent months, and they're not being shown the evidence against them or given any due process.

When Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents marched the housekeeper down the gangplank of the Victory I cruise ship in the Port of Detroit on the morning of July 11, she didn't know what was wrong, but she was confident it would get sorted out.
The crew member, originally from South America, had worked for 20 years on smaller cruise ships plying the Great Lakes. She split her time between her home country, where her family still lives, and the Great Lakes region, where she had a job she loved and a partner. She says that over the years, her respect for America and its dedication to the rule of law had grown.
It wasn't until a CBP agent told her to put her hands behind her back and she felt the cuffs click around her wrists that a horrible feeling washed over her, and she realized she may have been mistaken about something very, very important.
"When I was handcuffed, all that respect that had been building up for 20 years disappeared," says the former crew member, who requested anonymity.
Why the woman—whom Reason is calling "Maria" to protect her privacy—was being arrested would shock her even more when she eventually found out.
Maria is one of more than an estimated 100 cruise ship crew members who have been summarily deported and had their work visas revoked in recent months based on unsubstantiated allegations by CBP agents of possessing or viewing child pornography.
According to interviews, advocacy groups, and other news reports, CBP agents are boarding cruise ships with a list of targets and seizing their cell phones, laptops, and electronics. The crew members are handcuffed and detained. CBP agents then accuse them of having viewed or posted child pornography and pressure them to sign an admission, which includes a voluntary revocation of their C1/D visa (a joint crewmember and transit visa). The detainees are not shown the evidence against them or allowed legal representation.
The removals—which have occurred at ports in the Great Lakes region, Norfolk, Virginia, and Florida—have attracted limited outside attention, but they have caused fear and confusion in the cruise ship industry, which heavily relies on international crews.
One of the countries that supplies the most sailors to the cruise industry is the Philippines. It's unknown how many seafarers have been deported off cruise ships in recent months, but two Filipino advocacy groups, the National Federation of Filipino American Associations (NaFFAA) and the Pilipino Workers Center (PWC), say more than 100 Filipino sailors have been arrested, deported, and had their work visas revoked since June.
While CBP has arrested and charged several cruise ship employees for child pornography in targeted operations earlier this year and last year, advocates say these cases in recent months have been different.
"There's no evidence. There's no charges being filed. There's no convictions," says PWC executive director Aquilina Soriano Versoza. "And then they're just having their visas revoked."
NaFFAA National President Ryan Namata said in a press release that the organization is "concerned by recent reports of Filipino seafarers being deported without clear explanation."
"While we recognize the importance of upholding immigration laws, it is equally important to ensure that every individual is treated with dignity and in accordance with due process," Namata continued.
The NaFAA and PWC have demanded clarification and transparency from federal authorities, and the office of Rep. Bobby Scott (D–Va.) also launched an investigation. However, the CBP has refused to release any more details.
"CBP is involved in an ongoing operation," a CBP spokesperson said in response to a request for comment. "Due to the nature of this operation, we are unable to provide further details at this time."
A summary arrest, detention, and deportation under an accusation of possessing or viewing child pornography carries significant due process concerns, and also a devastating financial and reputational impact. A person whose C1/D crewmember visa is revoked cannot reapply for another one for 10 years.
"For these people who have worked as crew, and see that as their livelihood and their way of supporting their families, that's the kiss of death in that profession," says one individual in the cruise industry.
For Maria, being a room attendant on a cruise ship was a perfect job. "I love that job," she says. "My passion is to help others, to serve." She says she turned down opportunities to move to a supervisor position because she liked it so much.
On the morning of July 11, she says she was bringing two carafes to a guest room when she was approached by CBP officers. Once they confirmed her identity, the officers took her phone and other electronics and put them in plastic evidence bags.
After she was marched off the ship and handcuffed, Maria was taken to a temporary detention area with seven other Victory I crew members, all of the rest of them Filipino. She says none of them had been told why they had been arrested.
Then, one by one, they were called into a room where a CBP officer interrogated them. Maria says the officer accused her of posting a photo on her Facebook page in 2018 of an 11-year-old boy with his penis exposed.
"How come I would post something like that when I have two daughters?" Maria says she asked the CBP agent.
And if she had posted such a photo, she wondered, why had she been repeatedly allowed in and out of the country in the years since? She also says she demanded to see the post in question, but the officer refused.
"He said, 'You don't have rights, and I don't need to explain it to you,'" Maria recalls.
Soriano Versoza says the details are "very consistent" across the cases of Filipino sailors that the PWC has talked to.
"They're all individually being interrogated, and they're being accused of having watched or possessed child pornography. They will open up their phones, and CBP will go through all of their phones and not find anything. [CBP] might tell them, 'Oh, well we have evidence here that back in 2008 there was something,'" she says.
That evidence is never shown to the accused, but CBP officers then attempt to get detainees to sign admissions and other documents.
The Business Mirror, a news outlet in the Philippines, reported in July on the removal and deportation of Filipino seafarers from the Carnival Sunshine cruise ship at the Port of Norfolk, Virginia.
Marcelo Morales, one of those former crew members, told the Business Mirror that CBP agents boarded the Sunshine on May 30.
"They confiscated my cellphone and checked everything thoroughly," Morales said. "After the official search, they asked if I had viewed child pornography. I denied the accusation, and after they found nothing, I was cleared and allowed to return to the vessel—no charges, no citation, not even a warning."
But CBP officers boarded the ship again in Norfolk on June 28, accused Morales of watching child sexual abuse material, and placed him under arrest.
"No new evidence was shown. They didn't search my phone again—they just placed it in a small transparent envelope and took me," he said.
Morales was one of nine crew members arrested, held in detention, and then put on a flight back to Manila. The Business Mirror reported that 18 Filipino seafarers were deported from the Carnival Sunshine between February and the end of July.
"We were treated like criminals. We were not fed, we had no water. We are crying. We want justice for what was done to us," Morales said.
Back in detention at the Port of Detroit, Maria refused to sign anything. She was returned to the main holding area, where she says agents took her fingerprints and collected a mouth swab from her, likely for a DNA sample.
In the middle of the night, she says the seven other Filipino crew members who'd been detained with her were handcuffed and driven to the airport to be flown out of the country.
"I cry. I cry," Maria says. "My colleagues tell me, 'Momma, be strong. We love you.' When I saw them be moved out of the detention place, it was the hardest thing. Just like I was innocent, they were innocent. We came with valid visas, medical, everything valid."
The next morning, Maria was driven to the Detroit airport and marched in handcuffs through a terminal of passengers to a flight back to her home country.
"When I was going to this security place with the handcuffs and chain on my belly, it was the worst thing," Maria says.
Maria and the other deported seafarers represented more than 10 percent of the Victory I's overall crew. It seems statistically unlikely that so many of the Victory I's crew, all of whom were vetted by their respective governments and the U.S. government before being issued crewmember visas, were consumers of child pornography.
In addition to the 18 crew members of the Carnival Sunshine, the PWC and NaFFAA say as many as 80 Filipino crewmembers from Carnival's Mardi Gras and Vista cruise liners were deported in April and May.
In the Great Lakes, media outlets reported that 13 crew members were removed and deported from the Victory I and Victory II in July, along with 16 crew members from the Viking Octantis and Viking Polaris, and an unknown number from Pearl Seas Cruises.
Soriano Versoza notes that, even though international crew members don't live in the U.S.—and usually remain aboard the ship in U.S. ports—their removals will still count toward CBP's overall number of deportations.
"We really think that this is a part of the current administration trying to boost up its numbers of deportations as it's already claimed that it's trying to reach these 3,000-a-day quotas," she says.
While it may be an easy way to juice the agency's deportation numbers, the removals and visa revocations are destroying the livelihoods of former crew members.
Soriano Versoza says that once seafarers arrive back in the Philippines, they're finding out that, in addition to being banned from desirable U.S. cruise routes, they're blacklisted altogether by the agencies that hire sailors for major cruise companies.
"There are a few where they're being placed, having some options of just Asia routes," Soriano Versoza says. "But overwhelmingly, the workers that we've been talking to, the majority of the cruise ships like Royal Caribbean and Carnival are just not rehiring them at all."
To add insult to injury, Maria says that when she received her final paycheck, it was docked $450 for the cost of her repatriation flight.
"I always have a big respect for the U.S., but I'm hurt," she says. "I'm hurt from the way things are going on, for innocent people, working, giving their life, apart from their family."
Maria says she's been overwhelmed with how to begin rebuilding her life with such an awful accusation hanging over her head.
"I don't sit with my kids and explain, because I can't look in their faces, and I feel ashamed," she says. "Mentally, I feel destroyed. I don't want to do nothing. I passed into the worst time in my life."
She credits her faith in God for giving her the strength to carry on. "I'm holding onto Him," she says. "That's why I'm still alive."
Ricci Levy, the president and CEO of the Woodhull Freedom Foundation, a group that advocates for sexual freedom, says that what's happening to Maria and other crew members is "a fundamental violation of due process and human rights."
"They are being accused of one of the most stigmatizing crimes imaginable without being shown evidence, given legal counsel, or afforded a fair hearing," Levy says. "These summary deportations and visa revocations not only destroy livelihoods—they weaponize accusation as punishment."
Victory Cruise Lines did not respond to a request for comment. However, in a statement to other media outlets reporting on the raids, John Waggoner, the founder and chairman of Victory, said: "We are actively cooperating with federal authorities to clarify the circumstances, and my priority is always our crew and the experience for our guests. We wish to thank federal, state and local representatives across the Great Lakes for their prompt and continued attention to this matter."
Carnival, Viking, and Celebrity cruise lines did not respond to requests for comment.
In a press release, Scott said his office is investigating. "Our nation was founded on the fundamental principles of due process," Scott said. "Under our Constitution, everyone is entitled to due process regardless of citizenship or immigration status."
The removals have also caught the attention of members of Congress in the Great Lakes.
"President Trump campaigned on protecting people and removing illegal immigrants who are 'the worst of the worst.'" Rep. Shri Thanedar (D–Mich.) said. "Instead, we see incidents like the one at the Port of Detroit, where immigrants who are here to work and make a better life for themselves are detained and deported with no due process."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Reason still doesn't get what due process means in regards to legal residency it seems.
"There's no evidence. There's no charges being filed. There's no convictions," says PWC executive director Aquilina Soriano Versoza. "And then they're just having their visas revoked."
There's no evidence that there is no evidence except claims from an advocacy group. Their entire job is being advocates. They lie all the time.
The no charges and no convictions statements are meaningless. It is not required for revocation. A visa, as an example, can be revoked for even mere suspicion of drug use or promotion as an example. Happens at airports all the time.
Happens at airports all the time.
Or at the Canadian border. Try to drive in with a DUI on your record.
CBP have revoked visas at the border for mere mentions of drugs in text messages.
JesseBot approves of the government having the unlimited authority to fuck with people at the border.
Canada cdoes not allow Americans with DUIs to visit.
He is too stupid to understand the concept of borders and nations.
At least a DUI is the result of a conviction in a court of law.
What about the guy who "mentions drugs" in a text message? Same same?
In the article above, there is zero proof that any of those individuals were actually watching child porn. All we have is the government's word for it. Do you think the government ought to manufacture evidence against legal immigrants in order to justify kicking them out?
Courts of law are part of the government, dufus.
A conviction in a court of law requires a higher burden of proof than simply the allegations of the prosecutor. But you know this. Stop playing dumb.
Do you think the government ought to manufacture evidence against legal immigrants in order to justify kicking them out?
Conviction in a court of law requires a prosecutor and judge who want to convict you.
A fucking trial is not due process for foreigners stopped by customs and immigration you ridiculous discount DNC politruk.
I have a friend who was detained at the Canadian border in the early-2000s for a marijuana citation he received at a party in Atlanta in the mid-1970s. There was no arrest, everyone sharing a joint in the backyard was cited, no evidence was recovered and the charges against everyone were dismissed w/o a court appearance. He'd totally forgotten the incident. His assumption was there had been a huge transfer of random law enforcement data from the US following 9/11 as he had visited Canada several times in the '80s and 90s w/o incident.
My brother who was moving to the US to stay with his wife's family was stopped at the US border and denied entry for a year for not having the right paperwork.
He realized it was his own fault, said mea culpa, and they waited another year. Kkkemjeff thinks that was worse than Hitler.
Fuck I've been stopped at the US border before due to a name mix-up. It was no big deal.
Wrong again jeff. But honesty was never your strong suit. Or understanding laws.
Imagine of bears were doing drugs in the trunks of cars. How would you react then?
Also funny seeing the guy who thinks trespassing is a capital offense try to take the moral high ground.
chemjeff radical individualist 5 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
What is there to talk about?
From a libertarian perspective, Ashli Babbett was trespassing, and the officers were totally justified to shoot trespassers. Again from a libertarian perspective, the officers would have been justified in shooting every single trespasser. That would not have been wise or prudent, of course.
They were all trespassers trying to be where they weren't supposed to be.
So death to citizens but no penalty to foreigners seems to be your principles.
In the article above, how do we know that the individuals were actually viewing child porn? We don't. All we have is the government's word for it. And you support this. You support the government lying about legal immigrants in order to kick them out, in order to meet an arbitrary deportation quota.
We've gone from "I just want the government to enforce the laws", to "I want the government to make shit up in order to throw the foreigners out".
You support the government revoking visas for "mere mention of drugs" even if there were no drugs found.
You want the government to have unlimited authority to fuck with anyone they please at the border.
Are they citizens?
No?
My empathy is decidedly limited for non-citizens.
Especially those who violate the law.
How do you know she violated the law, JesseBot? You don't support any form of due process in which the government would actually have to *prove* that she broke the law.
You support the government lying and manufacturing evidence against foreigners in order to justify kicking them out.
"How do you know she violated the law, JesseBot?"
Suspicion is all that fucking matters at the border in order to deny entry you slimy fucking garbage simp.
And you support Democratic Party advocacy groups lying and manufacturing evidence against ICE in order to justify orangemanbad.
So, what rights do you think non-citizens (whether here legally or not) should have at the border, and in this country? Any rights at all?
Should the government have the legal authority to make up evidence against them in order to force them to leave?
Governments don't have to let in anyone, dipshit.
He's not so much a dipshit as a professional liar and a propagandist. Jeff knows he's lying and being mendacious. He hasn't actually fallen for the garbage he spews.
Yup. OMG! Advocacy group says people not owed protection under US law and not being punitively imprisoned under US law aren't being subjected to US law?!!! OK.
Libertarians for searching people en masse, arresting them on implausible charges, denying them legal representation, and deporting them.
They are not being criminally charged.
Vernon Depner the Evil Dipshit doubtlessly would SNOT object, were Shitself to be accused (without evidence) of child molestation, losing shit's job and paycheck, and having shit's final paycheck docked for shit's passage back to Hades where shit came from! Ass long ass Vernon Depner the Evil Dipshit is SNOT being criminally charged!
OK, now I understand!
That doesn't matter to these dishonest fucks. Everyone who's stopped at the border deserves a full trial at the taxpayers expense.
...at least as long as it's in the Democratic Party's interests.
Don't you think that is inherently suspicious that are no charges ? Just sign this confession and GTFO, and no we won't provide a lawyer to explain what you are signing. Isn't this obviously a visa revocation shell game ?
Cry more, lying pile of lefty shit.
CBP? I think they are looking for SPB.
an 11-year-old boy with his penis exposed.
The libertarian position ought to be that mere possession of an image of a child who is merely naked and not engaged in any sexual activity should not be a crime. When I was growing up, approximately 100% of parents possessed such pictures—I suppose that might not be true anymore given today's draconian laws and officious "child protection" officers. Posting it on Facebook—maybe that should be a minor misdemeanor, but better to just let Facebook handle it with rules enforcement.
See the famous cover of Nivana’s album.
In my state, if you own that album, or even a copy of Catcher in the Rye, you're technically a felon.
Literally only by your own judgement. Otherwise, nobody has been convicted of the crime for the circumstances you assert because everyone else, but you apparently, is capable of distinguishing nudity from sex.
Even juries capable of indicting a ham sandwich aren't as stupid as you're trying to be... technically.
Eleven-year-olds, Dude.
Simply being naked, Prude.
Makes me laugh for the same reason I was nonplussed at the Woodhull Foundation's being involved: like, well yeah, but it's so disconnected from the point of the story, who cares? They could just as well deport people on accusations of murder, since there are plenty of dead bodies around the world.
I'm on your side regarding possession of artifacts as crime. That said, the invocation of "Ricci Levy, the president and CEO of the Woodhull Freedom Foundation, a group that advocates for sexual freedom" has a very "If the 1A doesn't defend someone's right to take naked pictures of their children doing sexual things and share it with other people, then why even have it?" tone.
There may be a case to me had that CBP has to provide them with the evidence of their dismissal (with or without rebuttal), but the sexual freedom advocates are, pretty nominally, not primarily interested in the whole immigration/due process part of the issue.
Due process is leftist.
Despite numerous links sarc is too dumb to understand what due process means.
Where can I get a flight to the Phillipines for $450?
Australia.
Sorry, not sorry, but your attempt at making me feel sorry for these people fell apart right ... here.
Wow, an illegal immigrant not only respected rule of law, but made sure the reporter knew it!
Not an illegal immigrant.
Wholly mackerel, chemjeff gets something right!
I'll believe it's not a fluke when it happens a second time. That makes you the nose-picking liar.
Isn't it weird how you deliberately conflated legal and illegal immigration in order to justify the government's actions against her.
Yeah! That's your favorite trick that you pull here all the time. How dare he!
Fucking hypocrite.
Also, she's on a work visa which means she's not an immigrant, you deceitful fuck. Maybe she plans to be one someday, but right now she's not immigrating, so your whole point is garbage.
So let's review.
Non-citizens (legal and illegal) do not have First Amendment rights of free speech - they may properly be kicked out by the government based on nothing more than speech that the government doesn't like.
Non-citizens (legal and illegal) do not have First Amendment rights of free association - they may properly be kicked out if they are "associated with gang members" even if there is no evidence that the individuals involved are in a gang themselves.
Non-citizens (legal and illegal) do not have Second Amendment rights, duh. Who in their right mind thinks that INVADERS should have the *right* to own a gun?
Non-citizens (legal and illegal) do not have Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure - the government may properly interrogate them even without any probable cause, merely for being brown or speaking Spanish.
So what other Bill of Rights protections do non-citizens lack?
Are they protected against 'cruel and unusual punishment' - may the government lawfully torture non-citizens? If not, why not?
Do they have freedom of religion? May the government lawfully detain everyone at, say, a mosque because the government claims that everyone there is a non-citizen who should be kicked out (whether true or not)?
Do they have a Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination?
Do they have a Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial? Do they have the right to any trial at all, under any circumstance? Or may the government lawfully do whatever they want to non-citizens that they *suspect* is guilty of a crime, without having to bother with a trial?
Is this another "bears in trunks" moment? Please, let us know now, Jeffy.
Or a having beer in a chemistry lab analogy.
The Constitution protects everyone, immigrant or not. Getting the government to respect those rights is the hard part.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/amdt5-6-2-2/ALDE_00013725/
According to the Supreme Court, aliens seeking initial entry into the United States have no constitutional rights regarding their applications for admission.1 The Court has reasoned that the government has the inherent, sovereign authority to admit or exclude aliens, and that aliens standing outside of the geographic boundaries of the United States have no vested right to be admitted into the country.2
Thus, in its 1953 decision in Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, the Court held that the government could deny entry to an alien without a hearing, notwithstanding the alien’s temporary harborage on Ellis Island pending the government’s attempts to remove him from the United States.3 More recently, in Department of Homeland Security v. Thuraissigiam, the Court in 2020 rejected an alien’s constitutional challenge to a federal statute that limits judicial review of an expedited order of removal, reasoning that the alien—who was apprehended shortly after entering the United States unlawfully—could be considered to be an applicant for admission at the border.4 In short, for aliens seeking admission into the United States, the decision to permit or deny entry by an executive or administrative officer, acting within powers expressly conferred by Congress, is due process of law.5
The asswipe MG seems to hope lefty shits settle the issue and , as a lefty asswipe s/he ignores the pertinent issues (hint - criminal proceedings are not civil proceedings):
https://www.heritage.org/border-security/report/due-process-and-aliens-what-they-are-and-are-not-entitled-immigration
Fuck off and die, asswipe.
Foreigners do not have any right to enter or remain in our country. They do so at our pleasure. That makes the rest of your babble irrelevant.
Due process doesn't mean what you think it means.
Oh man that's so sad.
Well, anyway.
CBP Is Deporting Cruise Ship Crew Over Child Pornography Allegations ... Ricci Levy, the president and CEO of the Woodhull Freedom Foundation, a group that advocates for sexual freedom
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4BbxV3iJg8
+1 People are being deported for allegedly letting wolves into the hen house; to weigh in on the issue we got an advocate for wolf freedom.
This is what fascism looks like. And bonus bad it will hurt the US economy if non-US crews don’t want to take on US destinations.
Is this the new leftist thing? Throw out words incorrectly, try to trick other retards?
"This is what fascism looks like"
No Tony.
If you’re threatening free speech you’re a fascist.
If you’re illegally censoring social media you’re a fascist.
If you’re trying to disenfranchise the voting rights of others you’re a fascist.
If you try to bankrupt, then imprison, then shoot your political opponents you’re a fascist.
If you run Hollywood-produced kangaroo courts in congress you’re a fascist.
If you start impeachment proceedings that you know are phony and based on evidence you manufactured you’re a fascist.
If you’re trying to control the language of others you’re a fascist.
If you control the news media you’re the fascist.
The Biden administration and Democrats did every bit of that and more and you didn't care. In fact your Nazi ass celebrated it.
MAGA lies. Biden was not a fascist under any definition. Trump is.
Lies from steaming pile of TDS-addled shit. Fuck off and die, asswipe.
"Advocacy groups..."
Stop right there.
Establish some, at least minimal, level of believability before typing one more word, asshole.
He doesn't have to. They did away with honesty back in 2016.
Why do I get the feeling that according to Reason a foreign born person possessing child porn is not a valid reason to keep that person out of the USA?
So the cultists deem that brown foreigners are really illegal even when they're not.
Such good little Germans, you are.
"So the cultists deem that brown foreigners are really illegal even when they're not."
No, the cultists are posting lies like this, slimy pile of TDS-addled shit
All credibility lost right there. "You're guilty of whatever I say you are." This is just a ploy to get kick non-whites out of the country.
As a raging case of TDS-addled shit, you lost all credibility a long time ago. Fuck off and die, shitstain.
Irritability, anger issues, repeating the same phrase over and over again... it all makes sense now.
You're a stroke victim aren't you ?
The reason for the deportations is being in the US illegally. The allegations are merely what attracted the attention of CBP.