Making the World Freer with Homemade Guns
DIY firearms aren’t just an end-run around the law; they represent a libertarian political movement.
Recently, while touting gun seizures in a city that has some of the most authoritarian gun laws in the United States, Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch lamented, "the number of illegal guns that we've seen used in New York City has exploded since 3D technology has come about." She's not alone. Homemade guns are increasingly sophisticated and available almost everywhere. That's a good thing.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Americans, Armed and Scary
American dedication to privately owned weapons alarms observers from more restrictive countries—much to the amusement of many Americans, it should be noted, whose ancestors fled those places in search of greater freedom and found it, in part, in the ability to arm themselves and to generally flip the bird to government. That means that from the foundation of the U.S., privately owned weapons and their protection by the Second Amendment have had a strong ideological component. Now, innovators around the world are embracing private arms as expressions of liberty and creating simple designs that can be built in home workshops with commonly available tools and parts.
Critics argue that 3D-printed DIY firearms and their enthusiasts are spreading libertarianism around the world. Let's hope they're right.
Summarizing events at June's MoneroKon conference in Prague, an annual meeting devoted to "privacy-enhancing technologies and distributed systems," security expert Zoltán Füredi described a presentation by the pseudonymous Zé Carioca, designer of the recently unveiled Urutau, a 9mm select-fire firearm designed to be constructed with a 3D printer and components purchased at any hardware store. Rather than focus on his creation, Zé Carioca instead championed 3D-printed firearms as companions to cryptocurrency in challenging the power and reach of governments.
"His speech blurred the lines between technology, ideology, and extreme libertarian politics," commented Füredi. He added of the speakers' message, "Just as the freedom to transact (via cryptocurrency) is now seen as a fundamental human right, so too should be the right to bear arms—worldwide."
DIY Weapons: Innovative and Popular
To that end, Zé Carioca includes with his freely downloadable Urutau designs a document co-authored with fellow weapons designer Ryan Smith. Dubbed "The New Second Amendment," the authors state their "deep conviction that the unlimited right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental human right." To that end, they make it their objective that "a governing entity must find it impractical or impossible to overcomplicate or prevent the production of a privately manufacturable weapon."
Zé Carioca appears to have succeeded. In January, with Yannick Veilleux-Lepage of the Institute of Security and Global Affairs at Leiden University, Füredi described the Urutau as "much easier to build than the FGC-9, a semi-automatic 9mm firearm primarily constructed with 3D-printed parts and simple tools." They added that "the assembly instructions for the Urutau are exceptionally well-designed."
The FGC-9 (Fuck Gun Control 9mm) was designed by Jacob Duygu, a former German soldier who went by the pseudonym JStark before he died under mysterious circumstances after being questioned by German police. It was refined by an American identified by The New York Times as licensed firearms manufacturer John Elik. In a documentary about Europe's underground DIY weapons movement, a masked Duygu said that "to bear firearms is a human right" and that people "need to have the same force on the individual level as the executive force of the government entity that is ruling over them."
"This American brand of libertarianism has historically been a tough sell in many other parts of the world. Even if some people believed it in theory, strict laws made buying a gun so difficult that the ideology was almost beside the point," wrote Lizzie Dearden and Thomas Gibbons-Neff of the Times. "The FGC-9 is changing that."
The FGC-9 quickly became globally popular. In 2022, France24 reported the FGC-9 to be in wide use by rebels in Myanmar fighting that country's brutal government. They used the DIY guns for training, for hit-and-run missions, and to fill in the gaps in supplies of commercially produced arms.
The Urutau is designed as a simpler-to-produce successor to the FGC-9. It's intended to make restrictions even more difficult for governments to impose. And what's interesting is that both it and the FGC-9 were designed by non-Americans who embraced the idea that individuals should be put on an even footing with government enforcers. That's a major shift for a movement that began when Cody Wilson, a former law student from Austin, Texas, created the first 3D-printed single-shot pistol in 2013. That gun, dubbed the "Liberator," was also intended to enhance freedom and limit the reach of government. The movement, and the ideology behind it, have found fertile ground outside the United States.
Spreading Liberty Through Disobedience
Scofflawry as a means to expand liberty isn't limited to the field of firearms, of course. Zé Carioca gave his presentation at a conference where the main focus was on cryptocurrency and encryption—two technological means for putting human activity beyond state control. Marijuana is currently legal for recreational use in roughly half of U.S. states, but it remains illegal at the federal level. Those states choose to ignore federal law under pressure from residents who have long enjoyed the stuff with little concern for its legal status.
Decades ago, the movement to legalize homosexuality got its jump start from the Stonewall Uprising. In 1969, gays and lesbians streamed into the streets of New York City to violently confront police after the latest in a series of raids on the Stonewall Inn, a popular bar.
And, perhaps most famously, Prohibition ended in the U.S. largely because mass defiance, moonshiners, and bootleggers made enforcement impossible.
It makes sense that people from countries with restrictive firearms would take the lead in a movement that seeks to make those laws unenforceable. Americans may have cultivated the ideology and offered inspiration, but the movement picks up support where it's most needed.
That's not to say the U.S. is immune to gun banners. As mentioned above, New York City has authoritarian laws as do other jurisdictions. Zé Carioca and Ryan Smith are clear that their New Second Amendment is for Americans too, should the government and its laws become more restrictive. "Legal constraints like the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution are finite, vulnerable to ignorance, and have national boundaries, but our guiding principle does not," they wrote.
Americans delivered a libertarian DIY firearms movement to the world. The world may help preserve it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please to post comments
NYC is such a dangerous shithole, I would not want to rely on a DIY gun. And probably best to avoid the big crapple altogether.
Kudos to Americans for having taken the lead here! Now, next, we need to legalize honest reporting about employment matters, by labor officials!
Stark had a good design, but the mysterious poster Tstark has some truly next Gen tech built in
You can make all the guns you want, the choke point is primers.
My grandfather reloads as a hobby. One day ATF comes to his door and asks why he buys so much power. He says he reloads. They ask him how many rounds he has made. He says "I don't know" and then denies them entry. End of story.
Another reason why the ATF should be abolished.
It serves no real purpose and is constitutionally dubious.
You concern isn't completely unjustified, but between the mountains of ammo already in circulation and the fact that, e.g., Shinzo Abe was killed with a gun that used an electronic trigger, I think we'll be alright.
Certainly, no mile-long headshots from PLA guns and electronic primers or mounted, 3D-printed deFNders fed with plastic ammo in the immediate future, but, akin to the (if it were even more normal and organic) replacement of ICEs with EVs, that's not the point.
Guns will not be an equalizer anymore with the technologies that are on the horizon. Everything is changing too rapidly for old people to comprehend.
Hey, we agree on something. You think that the government will murder its citizens for political differences. So do I.
Homemade guns "represent a libertarian political movement" allowing you to "flip the bird to government enforcers?" In the 21st Century? That's not libertarian, it's anarchical. While it's true that Trump's masked secret police really ARE coming for you, it's false that your little homemade popgun will do anything more than send you down in a blaze of libertarian suicide. And suppose the government is enforcing legitimate and constitutional laws, like the "night watchman" laws that even libertarians concede to be necessary? Homemade guns means easy access for the actual dangerous hombres. Like last week's shooter from Nevada. 2A fanatics simply can't climb out of their 19th Century Wild West fantasy land where unrestricted access to killing machines -- that is, firearms -- might have been justifiable. Pathetic and scary at once.
These people were too privileged to ever have to grow up. Yet, right wingers are still outcompeted, unattractive and made obsolete by those who have indivuated into humans, by those who had to grow up and navigate the real world.
Right wingers and MAGAts will soon be very very gone, as modern, educated, young, attracrive women can smell their deep inviability and are repulsed by it.
Better americans will continue to smile and be happy as ugly, stale, pseudo human matter continues to break down in impotent whinging.
MAGA is a blessing to everyone who was hoping to publicly the ugliness of the american right. Thank you for being the sacrifice we needed. However, unlike Jesus, we needed you to exemplify how repulsive you are, and how ciritical it is to reject you. Thank you for doing all the things you do in public.
Does you Mother know that you are posting from her basement?
Right winger, your attempts to ignore will not be successful for much longer. You better hope to expire soon.
I parodied the “Rev” just the other day and wondered what came of him; now I know.
My exact thought. Waiting for the threat of replacement by my "bettors".
modern, educated, young, attractive women
Tend to be conservative. The leftists ones are any combination of grossly overweight, heavily tatted up, festooned with body piercings, have hair dyed the color of poisonous frogs, or shave off most of their hair entirely. Then they rail at traditional standards of beauty, which make them even uglier.
They're all yours, champ.
That's not libertarian, it's anarchical.
It is getting harder and harder for me to find self-described libertarians that aren't better described as some mix of conservative, anarcho-capitalist, and just plain anarchist. Oh, and with other types of big-business special interests thrown in for good measure.
Homemade guns means easy access for the actual dangerous hombres.
The obvious solution to that is to make even easier for "good guys" to get guns and arm themselves to counter the increasing numbers of "bad guys" with guns!
"Good guys with guns" is part of the Wild West fantasy. Bad guys strike without warning in schools, churches, business offices, public gatherings. People are dead before any "good guy" can haul out his sidearm, get an aim, and actually stop the bad guy. More likely he shoots fellow victims. Why can't 2A kooks understand that the only reason "good guys" would need guns is BECAUSE WE'RE GIVING UNRESTRICTED GUN ACCESS TO BAD GUYS LIKE THE MENTALLY ILL NEVADAN, who couldn't have acquired the badass weapon in New York.
According to the Founders, good guys need guns to keep the government from becoming the bad guys. One would think that leftists who are so concerned about Trump the authoritarian fascist declaring himself GodKing of America for Life would be all for an armed populace that could prevent it from happening.
According to the Founders, good guys need guns to keep the government from becoming the bad guys.
Even if true, what might have worked in the 18th century doesn't work now. What do you expect to happen if ordinary civilians with nothing more than some ARs and handguns go up against a professional military and all of its equipment?
Do you ever think of how bad it would have to be before people would resort to something that they would know would get most of them killed?
The number of dominoes of rights and institutions that would fall before guns would be considered as the solution is enormous. A massively more intelligent plan is to never let those dominoes fall. Then guns will never be needed.
Afghanistan has entered the chat.
Right. Because the U.S. has so much in common with Afghanistan.
An armed insurgency is an armed insurgency. And as I mentioned to another gun control nut, what do you do if half your army deserts when you tell them they're going to be attacking their home towns?
An armed insurgency is an armed insurgency.
My point has gone right over your head.
Afghanistan has only ever had various kinds of autocratic rule, as far as I can tell skimming its history. There were no democratic institutions the people could use to protect their rights. The only way to effectively oppose the abuse of power by the government was through organized (armed) resistance.
We have had a functioning democracy since the founding, with one very large crisis ~160 years ago that threatened to undo it, but plenty of less existential problems.
As long as we have the option to vote out a government we don't like, then guns just aren't a relevant factor in protecting our rights from government abuse.
And as I mentioned to another gun control nut, what do you do if half your army deserts when you tell them they're going to be attacking their home towns?
Yeah, and that is why autocrats work so hard to divide the population into those that are "patriots" and those that are "enemies of the state". That way, the soldiers can be more easily convinced that they aren't "attacking their home towns", but are fighting people that hate their own country, believe in the wrong god, and/or serve some foreign power. That is why they work so hard to make sure that the army consists of officers and soldiers that align with their ideology and propaganda. That is why they start small with having the military do domestic law enforcement. They can get them used to looking at citizens as potential threats. They can find out which soldiers are going to balk at doing those things so they can get them out and replace them with the "right kind" of soldier.
I didn't watch the movie, but that recent fictional thriller titled "Civil War" basically examines exactly how this might play out in the U.S. (Though, despite the marketing, it seems to be more about things like war journalism in general than being about any kind of political message, according to some review blurbs. Making it seem a bit of a bait-and-switch. It does have generally positive reviews, overall. A little higher among critics than audiences - 80% vs 69% on RT.) The trailer had this exchange that is relevant:
Joel: There has to be some mistake. We're American, right?
Unnamed Soldier: Okay. What kind of American are you? You don't know?
It is called a constiututional right, similar as to how people have unrestricted access to refuse unreasonable searches and seizures by police.
https://archive.md/mgil3
“The erosion of the rights of people on the other side of town will ultimately undermine the rights of each of us,” Andersen said in refusing to lift a ban he imposed last month.
Typical dorm room false presumptions: "good guys shoot fellow victims". Proof to date is that intervening armed citizens have less accidental shootings in emergencies than police.
Bad guys avoid cops and choose gun free zones. They are deterred by the possibility of armed resistance.
"Bad guys have unrestricted access to guns". Haven't bought a gun recently have you?
And yes, you CAN buy a semiautomatic, magazine fed rifle in 5.56 military caliber in New York, off the shelf, today, despite the SAFE Act (which only prohibited scary "badass" cosmetic features).
That's not libertarian, it's anarchical.
Shhhhh, shhhhh...
You are not a probate judge; in fact I doubt you are much of anything but a troll.
Not only probate, but civil, criminal, juvenile, municipal and appellate. Now retired, which allows me to express personal opinions as active judges cannot. Let's hear your credentials, you soi-disant Latinist whose very user name compares every other poster here to Cataline, announcing that we're trying your precious patience with our impertinences.
Why can't 2A kooks ...
A leftist "judge" who disdains the document he swore to protect. As stated, the 2A isn't about everyday criminals. It's there so the citizens have the ability to defend themselves against government. You know, filthy traitorous government employees ("judges") who disdain the BOR.
This Hickamore person must be new here.
Yes, "so the citizens have the ability to defend themselves against government." Guess you didn't read my post. I argue that 2A is obsolete. If government acts lawfully, resistance by force of arms is illegitimate. And if government acts unlawfully, your homemade gun won't protect you from the storm troopers. Meanwhile, 2A serves only to allow bad actors to acquire killing machines. Anyhow, most of our rights neither enjoy nor require federal constitutional status -- these are protected by state constitutions and/or state statutes and common law. A federal constitutional right of firearm ownership is absurdly obsolete in 21st century society, and 2A should be repealed, just like the Prohibition Amendment. Arguing for repeal of 2A isn't "treason;" it's the procedure specified in Article V. Not that we should expect peabrains to understand constitutional law.
And if government acts unlawfully, your homemade gun won't protect you from the storm troopers.
Maybe you missed the last twenty years or so and how the government storm troopers fared against an armed and dug-in insurgency in Afghanistan. Hint: Not swimmingly. You're going to also have to deal with mass desertion if President Whomever goes "Okay, boys, the mission today is to carpet-bomb your hometowns."
Meanwhile, 2A serves only to allow bad actors to acquire killing machines.
Bad actors are going to get their hands on illegal items regardless of what the law says. See: Prohibition in the 1920s, or all the estimate of unregistered weapons in Europe and Australia.
This isn't Afghan mountains; it's the familiar homeland with every square inch detailed from satellite and every address known to vote in certain ways.
Bad actors such as organized gangs can obtain guns under any circumstances. But the odd nutjob cannot. And it's the odd nutjobs at the margin who make the difference. Criminal gangs don't do random school shootings. Disaffected loners do. They are the ones to be deterred by the sensible gun control favored by huge majorities of Americans.
The odd nutjob must be slacking because rifles of any kind are used in less than 3% of homicides, and are used less that fists and feet and knives. Go figure.
When NY and Illinois banned assault rifles by requiring existing rifles to be registered, compliance in the state was estimated at less than 10%. Assuming you get your utopian amendment to rescind the 2nd Amendment, nobody is handing in guns to the state. So that leaves tough guys like you to come and take them. Where in the stack coming in will you be?
This isn't Afghan mountains; it's the familiar homeland with every square inch detailed from satellite and every address known to vote in certain ways.
Mass desertion. What do you do, General, when a fair chunk of your army quits the field and takes up arms against you? What if they empty out your armories first, or destroy them on the way out?
Bad actors such as organized gangs can obtain guns under any circumstances. But the odd nutjob cannot. And it's the odd nutjobs at the margin who make the difference. Criminal gangs don't do random school shootings. Disaffected loners do.
Criminal gangs would never think to profit off a black market in illegal weapons by selling guns to disaffected loners, right?
They are the ones to be deterred by the sensible gun control favored by huge majorities of Americans.
We can see that's not the case, since many of these shooters turn their gun on themselves afterwards, making any law they're breaking no deterrent at all.
You can not stop them,.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq1TXEE_QK4
this video was recorded in the Philippines.
Gangs will have access to guns.
Of course, law enforcement in the U.S. has been trying to shuit down criminal gangs for what?
Two hundred years?
2A was a right recognized by citizens who fought a war against a colonial power that was trying to disarm them.
During the 20th century, Univ of Hawaii estimated that governments killed about 260 million citizens (defined as democide). That estimate excludes those serving in the military. But yeah, government “top men” should be the only ones armed.
What deters criminals from getting guns illegally? This way they can skip killing the Arms owner or picking over bodies during riots and go straight for the goods.
Even intentional criminals are not obliged to shoot whom they plan to redistribute wealth with.
A while back when I was laid off, I was learning new CAD software. I made machine drawings and models of several of my guns. This included reverse engineering several of the stampings and parts so that they could be made with the machine tools that I own. It isn't hard to do. I can make copies of these guns that are as good or in many cases better than the manufacturer. I already reload ammo for them and have a ready supply of primers, brass, powder and bullets.
I knew a right wing dead end of evolution who referred to his rifles as "her", especially when he talked about lubricating "her".
You guys are a generation of repulsive incels like there has never been one.
5.56, if you want to change minds instead of prioritizing stroking the figurative "I'm better than you" bump in your brain, you should try to react to people who disagree with you with something other than disgust. If stroking that bump is your priority, then your behavior makes sense and has the advantage of not costing or risking much; however, you might ask yourself whether this form of self-pleasuring is worth the never-to-be-retrieved time spent on it. My priorities are different, but I do ask myself whether I am posting as a restorative break in work or posting as procrastination from my duties.
Not to agree with anti-gun or anti-3d printing zealot, but... no you didn't.
Your claims are more contextually disjointed than a low-level AI. While you were laid off, did you have enough time to learn CAD to reverse engineer and machine your clips from solid billets too?
'Merica!
Check out this video about homemade guns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pq1TXEE_QK4
I noticed the leftists here are opposed to a private citizen having the right make/own a homemade firearm.
They site reasons which are outright false and laughable.
What Tuccille is arguing here is the citizens in this country has the right to manufacture and own a firearm as indicated in the 2A, an idea any red-blooded closet totalitarian would despise and condemn.
Leftists are in love with authoritarianism and especially totalitarianism and worship tyrants for the sake of safety and security, but at what price?
Taking away a person's right to own/make a firearm is the first step toward a fascist or communist state, and all smart leftists know this, and this why they absolutely loathe the 2A and its adherents.
Bulletin 1: the American Revolution commenced15 years before the Second Amendment was adopted. Bulletin 2: for 200+ years the Second Amendment was NOT legally construed to protect a personal right to keep and bear arms except for militia purposes. Bulletin 3: militias no longer exist, which means the rationale of the Second Amendment is just as obsolete as that of the Third.
Oh look, a time traveler from 1995, and he brought along his gun control arguments too!
LOL, not even the current Mom's Against wackos hold to the 2A as a collective right.
Militias do exist. NY State has one. And in jurisdictions without a militia, one can be formed by those so inclined.
Oh, sure. But flash mobs exist. And I saw news footage of the LA Riots of 1992 and more recent riots in June of this year 2025 called the ICE Riots, and there were the George Floyd protests that included rioting.
Militias differ chiefly in that a true militia has a well-defined chain of command whilst a riot has only the very loosest of rank, possibly determined by who does the most damage at a specific moment.
However, a good militia can be comprised solely of snipers on a mission.
Relevance: Our own government has admitted that it is not ready for UAV swarm attacks. All some maniac would have to do would be to sync up a bunch of assassin drones to get assisted selfies into pages of history as yet another disconnected individual -- such as Parade Shooter, July 4th, 2022 at Highland Park, Illinois -- one who can't even explore a free public library to find out if there could be different ideas worth considering.
DIY firearms aren’t just an end-run around the law; they represent a libertarian political movement.
And significant felony charges.
Where is it a felony to manufacture a personal firearm?
Certain governments require registration for firearms and have made felony awards and reserved prison space for anyone found to be noncompliant.
Although, I am not personally certain if a DIY firearm can legally qualify for the definition used in a given statute.