Zohran Mamdani's Socialist Vision for New York Is a Recipe for Disaster
Socialism doesn't bring a dignified life. On the contrary, it's wrecked lives wherever it's been tried.

I live in New York City. "Proud Democratic Socialist" Zohran Mamdani is likely to be my next mayor.
I'm not happy about it. But I am outnumbered.
Mamdani is popular. He won more primary votes than any other candidate in the city's history.
Minneapolis may also elect a socialist mayor.
Why?! How deluded can voters be?
In my new video, I explain why their socialist ideas are destructive.
Mamdani mocks those of us who fear socialism. He says socialism just means that the state "provides whatever is necessary for its people to live a dignified life."
Sounds nice.
But socialism doesn't bring a dignified life. It never has. It's wrecked lives wherever it's been tried.
Mamdani says socialism isn't a threat. It just means "seizing the means of production."
For example, to provide more housing for the poor, government should take over apartment buildings.
"Whether you call it the abolition of private property," said Mamdani, "or you call it just a statewide housing guarantee, it is preferable to what is going on right now."
No! It's not! This idea has failed, again and again!
Socialism, in various degrees, was tried and abandoned in the USSR, China, Vietnam, Mongolia, Cambodia, Afghanistan, South Yemen, Myanmar, Angola, Mozambique, Benin, Congo, Ethiopia, Somalia, Tanzania, Zambia, Ghana, Madagascar, Nicaragua, Guyana, Chile, Israel, Sweden, and India.
Countries that didn't abandon socialism, like Cuba, Bolivia, and North Korea, stay poor.
Venezuela was once the richest country in Latin America. Now it's the poorest.
"Socialism destroyed Venezuela," says Venezuelan-born economist Daniel Di Martino. "No government has the capacity to run thousands of businesses."
People need capitalism—a profit motive—to do that.
Yes, China and Vietnam have done well economically, but that only happened because they mostly gave up on "owning the means of production." Only then did they begin to prosper.
Leftists claim Scandinavia is an example of "successful socialism." Sen. Bernie Sanders (I–Vt.) shouts, "Look to countries like Denmark, like Sweden, and Norway, and learn from what they have accomplished for their working people!"
But Scandinavia is not socialist! Today, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway are capitalist countries with big welfare systems.
Denmark's prime minister was so annoyed by the ignorance of American politicians, he traveled to Harvard to say, "Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy! Denmark is a market economy."
Yet Mamdani says he'll "create a network of city-owned grocery stores…whose mission is lower prices, not price gouging…we'll pass on those savings to you."
"No profit motive" appeals to people. But the profit motive is exactly what keeps stores stocked and groceries relatively cheap. It's why Americans spend much less on food than we did 100 years ago.
Capitalism works because businesses must compete to get your dollars.
Compare your experience at profit-seeking stores to waiting in line at your state's DMV.
Even if Mamdani's state-run groceries work well, they'll still consume tax dollars while taking customers from businesses that pay taxes.
Mamdani says he'll cover those losses by raising taxes on the rich even more. But that's never worked either!
Economist Art Laffer is known for illustrating that at a certain level, higher taxes stop bringing in more money. That's because people work hard to escape high taxes.
"They'll change where they earn their income," he told me. "Change how much they earn, when they receive the income. They'll change all those things to minimize taxes."
Maryland found out he was right. Democrats raised taxes on the rich. They expected to bring in $106 million. The state lost $257 million.
Europe axed its wealth taxes for the same reason. Millionaires just left.
Even NPR called it an "exodus."
In America, it's even easier to escape high-tax states and cities. Millions have already left California, New York, and Illinois.
Mamdani once acknowledged this: "Our tax base growing smaller and smaller each day with New Yorkers leaving."
He doesn't talk about that now.
Mamdani has so many bad ideas, I can't fit them in this column. Next week I'll write about his other feel-good ideas, like raising the minimum wage to $30, rent control, and free buses.
COPYRIGHT 2025 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It couldn’t happen to a nicer city. I hope he is able to implement his entire agenda.
I don't wish evil on anyone. And there are plenty of innocents even in NYC.
It is what they want. Hope they get it good and hard.
I live in NYC and I emphatically do not want his agenda.
Yes you do
You might want to order a new Dunker to prep for what is coming.
Well it's a beach town and the surfing alone is worth the socialist shenanigans to some.
ISWYDT
At least the rat problem will be fixed. Of course you'll need to learn the answer to, "How do you like your rat cooked?".
Obligatory Demolition Man reference here.
Curtis Sliwa will solve the rat problem with the only solution that has ever worked: flooding the city with street cats.
In Soviet NYC the food eats you if you order rare.
Compare your experience at the US Post Office to your experience at FedEx. The post office opens at 8:30AM, too late to stop by before work. FedEx opens at 8AM. The post office closes at 5PM, too early to stop by after work. FedEx closes at 8PM. The post office is closed on Sundays. FedEx is open 7 days a week.
The post office offers Priority Mail with "1 to 3 day" shipping by 6PM. FedEx offers next day delivery, by 9:30AM or 10:30AM or 5PM, depending on price.
The US Postal Service gets a letter across the country in two days for 78 cents. I want to see any private delivery service do that.
Can the private company run a yearly multi-billion dollar budget deficit that is picked up by the taxpayers to keep the cost at 78 cents?
TBF, the Post Office would actually be profitable, if it wasn't for the insane pension plans that they are forced by law to fully fund every year. (At least last time I looked into it.)
And what, exactly, is the problem with the USPS having to fully fund its future retirement plan liabilities?
What is a letter? Is that like some kind of long distance alphabet game?
A SMTP server gets the letter (in email format) across the country in milliseconds for a few pennies per letter.
Bullshit. At best, a coast to coast letter arrives in 3 to 4 days; at worst, never.
As a former rural carrier and speaking as someone that still mails things...not true.
As someone who mails stuff for work, it is true.
It's past time to divide the continents into ideological political refuges. And then anytime somebody declares their local habitat unjust, they get deported to whatever paradise they prefer.
No, not very libertarian but at least one continent might preserve some liberty.
You mean like border patrol!? ???? /s
[Na]tional So[zi]alist[s] will never stand for it; as they don't know.
Let’s see how many socialists are left in NYC after Mamdani taxes their Brooklyn brownstones and kids 529s.
Gov - 'Guns' against you will make sh*t for you?
No. 'Guns' don't make sh*t and that's all that separates government from business.
That's why it never has and never will work.
And why trying to make it work ends up in government genocide.
It's a Zero-Sum resources games ... again; 'Guns' don't make sh*t.
Come on, who could ague with the angelic sentiment of “From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs”?
Any good intersectional post-modern Marxist zealot, that's who.
"From rich white cis males to everyone else, but mostly to poor black trans fatties."
"to each according to their needs" by 'armed-theft' "from each according to their ability" to be robbed.
Yes; It's truly amazing the amount of pride [WE] mobster socialists take in their Crime-Spree parade.
Grocery store robberies are pretty rare in NYC. Shoplifting, and employee theft, both feeding organized crime, are the big problems. But high rent and high property taxes are even bigger problems. (I pay a low property tax rate but commercial property owners pay a high rate IN NYC.)
Socialists will be sure and make
"high property taxes are even bigger problem" which is
"organized crime", "the big problems"
Just because [WE] voters use 'gov' 'guns' to do organized crime against our fellow man doesn't mean it isn't a crime.
"It's wrecked lives wherever it's been tried."
That statement proves that Stossel is an ignoramus. Israel and the UK prospered under socialism. In fact there probably would have been mass starvation in Israel in the 1950s under a free market economy.
I didn't read past that line. Mamdani's policies are stupid and will do a lot of bad to NYC but his top three competitors all have a lot of problems too.
The UK assuredly did not prosper under socialism. The three-day week, miners' strikes, etc. Margaret Thatcher's glib diagnosis of why socialism doesn't work may be wrong, but it's hard to argue that the UK was better off in the 70s than the 80s. (Of course, joining the EEC helped in the long run)
And Israel's thriving was due to heavily non-economic conditions - a mission, if you wlll.
No socialist economy has ever solved the pricing problem - because it can't.
Exactly. As Hayek pointed out, individuals lack the knowledge to price and distribute goods. No matter how much power they have. On the other hand prices, through supply and demand, communicate information through the system telling where goods are scarce and where they are abundant. It’s not perfect, but it distributes goods better than command and control.
You three do realize that Democrats platform is literally [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] right?
Its so funny to hear leftards preach, "[WE] want government to provide X,Y,Z but, but, but ... [WE] aren't the Socialists!"
At least 13 of your politicians have came out of the closet and proudly admits to being as-much.
"You three do realize that Democrats platform is literally [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] "
National Socialism was about genocide of Jews. You seem not to understand that. The actual socialists in Germany were the only political party oppose making Hitler a dictator. Within a few months they were all either in concentration camps, in exile, in hiding, or dead.
LMAO. The known consequence of National Socialism leads to genocide of X,Y,Z - Identify-as.
That doesn't mean that is the definition of National Socialism.
UK GDP per capita, 2015 US dollars, 1960: $15,136.
UK GDP per capita, 2015 US dollars, 1978: $23,195
Source: World Bank
UK GDP per capita, 2015 US dollars, 1996: $33,011.
That is a 53% growth under 18 years of Socialism and a 47% under 18 years of Thatcherism.
Mamdani has it all figured out. You see his grocery stores are going to buy in bulk - that makes all the difference.
In socialist utopia you will be forced to eat the expired food. Eliminating waste is essential to lowering costs.
Bulk cheesy proofs are the cure for all poor economic situations.
What's funny is Mamdani should just E.O. that all Grocery Stores now gets to legally pack Gov 'Guns' against their customers.
...because that is exactly what he is proposing.
"Armed-Theft" taxes will now pay for your *now-duty* to buy groceries from the government.
One more example of Mamdani's stupidity. Most grocery stores in NYC are either part of cooperatives or franchises that already have the economy of scale. A few are part of chains that also have that. Mamdani's five stores won't be a large enough purchaser to get that advantage.
Why?! How deluded can voters be?
Are you asking me, or the media/academia/celebrity vassals who programmed them?
""Mamdani says he'll cover those losses by raising taxes on the rich even more. ""
Doesn't understand the rich can easily leave NYC.
Here's Cuomo in 2019.
"On Monday, he told his state's citizens that income tax revenues were coming in $2.3 billion below the expectations of just a month ago. "That's as serious as a heart attack," he said."
""Cuomo, to his credit, does get it. Many high-income taxpayers are leaving New York for low-tax states, tired of paying the state's bills and then being demonized leftist activists for being "rich" and told they must give more. He knows that sending the wrong signals could lead to a mass exodus of higher-income residents from his state, one that would leave a massive hole in the budget.""
https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/cuomos-budget-rich-high-taxes/