Ford Paid $800 Million in Tariff Costs Over 3 Months, Despite Building Most of Its Cars in America
That should put an end to the Trump administration's silly talking point about how there is no tariff for products built in the U.S.

If President Donald Trump's tariffs were boosting the prospects of American-based manufacturing, then Ford Motor Co. ought to be one of the biggest winners.
After all, Ford builds more vehicles in the United States than any other automaker—it churned out 1.8 million of them last year—while employing around 57,000 manufacturing workers at plants across the upper Midwest. It's a legacy American brand, doing the sort of blue-collar work in the Rust Belt that the Trump administration believes its trade policies will directly benefit.
In reality, the tariffs are crushing Ford. The automaker announced this week that it paid $800 million in tariff-related expenses during the second quarter of 2025 (during which it posted its first quarterly loss since 2023), and that it expects the tariffs to reduce annual profits by about $3 billion. Even for a company that earned an operating profit of $10.2 billion last year, that's a tremendous blow.
In response, Ford is reportedly seeking relief from the very tariffs that are supposed to be helping them. Ford CEO Jim Farley told Bloomberg this week that Ford executives are having conversations "every day, every week, every month" with the Trump administration in an attempt to undo the "disadvantage" that the tariffs have created.
That ought to put an end to the Trump administration's silly talking point about how tariffs don't affect businesses that make their products in America. It turns out that 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum—two materials automakers require—and a 25 percent tariff on imported car parts have a dramatic impact on any American company that builds cars. Similarly, General Motors has reported that tariffs cost it more than $1 billion during the second quarter.
Carmakers, including Ford and G.M., have so far avoided passing the cost of the tariffs along to consumers—but they won't be able to do that for long with the losses piling up. The Detroit Free Press reports that various auto analysts expect consumer prices to rise by between 4 percent and 8 percent in the second half of the year.
Ironically, the fact that Ford builds so many of its cars in the United States makes it uniquely susceptible to Trump's tariff schemes. As The Wall Street Journal reported this week, the Trump administration's recently announced (though still not finalized) deals with Japan and the European Union will apply a lower tariff rate of 15 percent on finished cars imported from those places. Meanwhile, automakers toiling in the U.S. are facing relatively higher tariffs on the raw materials and parts they need.
In short: The tariffs are hurting the very industries they were supposed to help. It's time to put an end to this failing experiment in economic central planning.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
So your saying those Kulaks are still hoarding billions. Tax them harder!
In Eric's own links it mentions no costs to consumers. In the article below the main story it mentions 80 recalls. Seems to be driving up their costs assumed. Says Ford was late to shift supplies. Mentions EV and hybrid markets, already a known loser for Ford. What we dont see is a detailed breakdown of the actual costs categorized as tariffs. Just a broad claim.
The article over all is terribly written. Where the fuck did you even find this in the back pages of yahoo? Did you even listen to Fords finance calls?
The credibility gap widens.
Yes, you democrats have less credibility all the time.
I suspect a tactic by some of these car companies that were already on their ass due to the inflated costs of their vehicles, failure to boost their EV lines after going all in with them, and the cost of recalls will be to blame the tariffs.
Ive been on 3 different share holder calls this week for large manufacturing groups with supply chains internationally. Not one of them increased their estimated costs impacted by tariffs, most of them reduced estimates by 40% or more as they switch chains.
I tried reading the Auto Yahoo story but it is a fucking mess.
Wonder if Eric has checked to see if tariffs are more than costs from supply chain cost growth the last few years, my guess is no.
But yeah, many od the failing companies are blaming tariffs. Which is why I pointed out the recalls and declining sales from the EV lines they went all in on.
The biggest problem with Ford's EV line isn't necessarily declining sales, it's that the actual sales numbers never came anywhere near their projections for the investment they made to build them.
The Obama administration (which I count Pudding Brain's as his third term) spent years jawboning auto companies into moving towards EVs, while putting ridiculous demands on ICE engine emission and mileage regs to ensure that vehicles, which had largely become pretty reliable across the board in the 2000s, eventually became a bunch of over-engineered, overly complex crap boxes that are mainly iPads with a car built around them.
And even then, EVs are still a niche product driven mostly by the Daily Show-watching pinko bourgeiosie, not the working class that couldn't give a shit about fancy tech and just need something to get from Point A to Point B on a budget.
Toyota still seems to be the only company that's really figured out start-stop without harming the engine after 20-plus years of the Prius being on the market, and even then they're putting turbos on engines that were absolute tanks before the Biden regs fucked that up, too. I recently paid cash for a 2010 manual Yaris that will probably last longer than most of Toyota's new turbo engines. I'll still get better gas mileage than them, and the best part is that there isn't a fucking iPad on the dash.
Words of wisdom there. But to be fair Ford was scrambling to get ahead of EV mandates which would have theoretically put them in the driver's seat. But how they misread the shorter term sales is a real head scratcher. A farmer in Iowa looking to buy an F-150 is figuring on a ten year workhorse and probably doesn't give a shit if it comes with an iPhone. I know that just as an outside observer that just talks to these people once in a while. Anyway the damage done to the auto market has a lot more to do with market distortion created by green new dealers then anything else.
Anyway the damage done to the auto market has a lot more to do with market distortion created by green new dealers then anything else.
This is really the biggest issue. The green cult's been the epitome of the Atlas Shrugged villians, expecting everything to continue to function at a high level regardless of the demands placed on it.
This is yet another reason to get rid of the democrats.
the biggest problem is Ford made a slot racer & called it a Mustang.
Was Dildo Depot one of them?? All your dildo needs under one roof. Why don’t you just order them online?? Oh wait, you enjoy the shopping experience and maybe meeting someone to take to the Porta Potty…another company you hold shares in. 😉
“ Ive been on 3 different share holder calls this week for large manufacturing groups with supply chains internationally”
Sure you have, Jesse. I’m sure all the movers and shakers in the business world are waiting on your brilliant insights into international supply chains and the impact of tariffs on production costs.
Your analysis boils down to “They aren’t saying it’s tariffs, but if it is tariffs it isn’t actually increasing prices, even though they have already said they have held off on passing the added costs along to consumers, but won’t be able to do so indefinitely”.
Who was it that said that the tariff reckoning would be happening around now and through the fall? Oh, right. That was me.
Who was it that said (and continues to say) that tariffs won’t cause prices to rise? Oh, right. That was you.
I made my estimates and projections based on my experience in international supply chains and standard lead times. Literally nothing very complicated or unusual. What was your basis, again?
When there’s a 25% tariff on imported components and a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum (two of the major components of automobiles), how dumb does someone have to be to think there isn’t an added cost to produce cars?
And when your competition is only going to pay 15% on a car built completely overseas, how is that not an advantage … for foreign-built cars?
Do you think that extra cost just evaporates in between the port and the factory?
Do you think that companies will just eat a sizable chunk of their profits in added costs?
Where do you think that money is going to come from, if not consumers? A money tree? The pot of gold at the end of the rainbow? Hitting the Powerball?
Tell us, genius. How does an extra $800 million in costs get covered in the business world?
As I mentioned before, no one wants to be the first to raise their prices because it will hurt their market share. But soon after the first company does, everyone else in the industry will do so as well. This is basic pricing strategy, not rocket science.
Those clumps will also happen at staggered intervals, so one week it may be cars, the next week it could be new housing construction, the next groceries (bananas, for example, aren’t grown much in the US, nor is coffee, nor is cacao, nor area myriad of other common grocery products), the next electronics, etc.
You’re whistling past the graveyard if you think that tariffs won’t raise prices. As an added “fuck you” to Americans, they will probably also raise unemployment (something else we’ve seen recently) and slow the overall economy.
But apparently Jesse knows better and the things that have been reported should be ignored because … something, and the BLS is out to get Trump and the Fed is out to get Trump and the only numbers you can trust are the ones that Trump says are the real ones.
Just like he and his Sharpie changed the entire weather patterns in the Gulf of Mexico, it will do the same for unemployment, GDP, and the cost of goods.
When there’s a 25% tariff on imported components and a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum (two of the major components of automobiles), how dumb does someone have to be to think there isn’t an added cost to produce cars?
ItS BeCaUsE ThEy TrIeD tO mAkE EvS.
I suspect a tactic by some of these car companies that were already on their ass due to the inflated costs of their vehicles, failure to boost their EV lines after going all in with them, and the cost of recalls will be to blame the tariffs.
Right. They're (Ford and GM) lying about the impact of tarrifs because their 'lectric cars failed. Couldn't be because tarrifs used the way Trump is using them is fucking stupid. Nope.
Sherry House, CFO, stated the net impact of tariffs as 800 million in the transcript of the earnings call for Q2.
Jesse knows their numbers better than the company’s CFO.
Jesse no further knows his ass from a hole in the ground.
Didn't say that. Just letting him where it derived from. Thought it was a fair question to ask, so I looked up the answer.
So, Reason saying "Ford paid $800 million in tariffs" is a lie?
The entire column is BS. Ford manufactures more of its car parts outside the country than in. The prices of steel have absolutely not gone up to the degree mentioned in the story. Reason doesn't mean to straight out lie.
“ Ford manufactures more of its car parts outside the country than in.”
Most car companies do, because it costs less. That’s the point, that tariffs hurt American companies by unnecessarily driving up the cost for them to make their products.
“ The prices of steel have absolutely not gone up to the degree mentioned in the story”
They didn’t say anything about the price of steel. They referenced the tariff on steel (and aluminum), which is exactly what they said it is.
Someone will be along shortly to reassure us that additional costs due to tariffs will be 100 percent absorbed by businesses and consumer prices will not increase.
Remember when Democrats would be rightly attacked and ridiculed for claiming that when they hike taxes on businesses, that the companies can just pay out of their profits without raising prices or cutting back on labor costs? They'd say that their taxes could not possibly be a drag on the economy because that's not their intention. They'd further claim that they could return those taxes to the economy in the form of government investment and get a better return than if the companies kept their money and spent it the way they thought was best. Remember that? And remember how they were always spectacularly wrong? Yeah, me too.
You’re a worthless drunk, so you don’t remember shit.
Someone will be along shortly to reassure us that additional costs due to tariffs will be 100 percent absorbed by businesses and consumer prices will not increase.
Have you been to a car dealership in the last 5 years? Auto manufacturers are already charging a fucking arm and a leg long before the spring of 2025. Stellantis didn't become a wannabe luxury brand due to Trump's tariffs. Some vehicles have been rotting on dealer lots for TWO model years at this point. There's YouTube videos all of the fucking place documenting it. And on top of that, auto repos are the worst they've been since 2008, because these dealers are so desperate to get this shit off their lot they're selling cars at inflated interest rates to anyone with a pulse, just like the housing bubble in the mid-2000s.
None of that shit is due to auto tariffs.
I think last time Eric posted this i put the cost growth the last few years for vehicles. This year the cost growth was smaller than the preceding 5 years on a yearly metric. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Ripples, man.
“ Some vehicles have been rotting on dealer lots for TWO model years at this point”
Depends on the car. I was in a bad accident a couple years ago and I had to go almost to DC to get the Prius I wanted. There were only four in a 150 mile radius of my house. I had to pay full sticker price because supply was so low. I’m sure there are cars that don’t sell, but it’s probably more a function of the make and model, or the economic health of an area than the sticker price.
Cars these days are very cheap, relatively speaking. They have more amenities and more safety features (as I can personally attest to) than ever before.
And I don’t know where you live that cars are rotting on the lots, but it isn’t anywhere near me.
“ There's YouTube videos all of the fucking place documenting it”
I found the source of your problem. YouTube and X aren’t data sources, they’re anecdote factories.
“ None of that shit is due to auto tariffs.”
You understand that low demand, especially with high supply, drives prices down, right? That’s as basic as it gets. So why are prices going up in a high supply/low demand environment?
Ford has factories in Mexico, Canada, Russia, Thailand, China, Spain, India, Turkey and South Africa for reasons that escape me.
Why an American company would have their vehicles made all across the globe is beyond me.
Why an American company would have their vehicles made all across the globe is beyond me.
Why do Japanese car companies have factories in the US? It's the same reason.
"Why do Japanese car companies have factories in the US? "
...to save money on transportation costs.
Wrong. The 15% tariff imposed on cars imported from Japan is much more than shipping, which is between one and three grand per car. Imported trucks have 25% tariff rate.
Wrong. Japan was making cars in America long before Trump told Barbara Walters he'd think of running for President if things got worse. Glad you noticed they got worse, now just realize who's to blame?
Tariffs on cars and trucks predate Trump.
This discussion is way beyond you, so fuck off.
Sarc will never blame Democrats.
Goat-suckers will never stop lying, and Worshitting the Orange Evil One!
It also serves as a currency hedge - you can't hedge currency risk long-term simply by using forward contracts.
By the way. Nice strawman Eric.
That should put an end to the Trump administration's silly talking point about how there is no tariff for products built in the U.S.
Boehm goes the dynamite.
So if they're building cars in America, what are they paying tariffs on? Imported food for their US factory cantinas?
FTA:
Steel prices are down over the last four years in a steady pattern.
I'm pricing tires for my car right now. Did a little research and found that there's a 25% tariff on imported tires. And that's on top of Trump's 10% baseline tariffs as well an country-specific tariffs. So you can add that to the price of new cars as well.
The tariff has been in place for many years...
That’s why I said “on top of”.
Yet the price is the same as it has been since Biden's massive inflation caused everything to go up in price. Oh right I forgot, dems did it first and it was okay for them.
Considering under Trump's energy policies, transportation has come down in price. So perhaps the savings from Trump's policies are more than the tariff increases and that is why there has been no inflation and in fact inflation has gone down and so have prices?
Are you going to now cry and say Trump's policies should provide even deeper savings from the abhorrent leftist Biden inflationary policies but the tariffs have limited the amounts? I'm okay with that since at least you admit Trump's policies are having positive results that are benefitting Americans.
Keep defending taxes.
Sarc, drawing wheels on your piss soaked refrigerator box doesn’t make it a car. Just like putting on lipstick and a wig for your get together with Pedo Jeffy doesn’t make you a girl.
Meanwhile in the real world, Ford loses $5.5 BILLION on their ev bulllshit. I am sure that in no way effects the cosumer.
Meanwhile, in the real world, Ford is paying tariffs that many cultists seemed to think would be paid by exporters.
Next, you will be blaming Jaguar’s cratering sales on tariffs.
Pretty sure they said it would be paid by importers…
Are you calling Trump a liar?
"Domestic Manufacture hit with $800 M tax bill. Republicans Thrilled."
401K's hardest hit.
I don't know what the fuck you two are going on about here. Mine's gone up 7.5% this year.
For now. You can't keep taxing businesses and expect them to thrive.
Basically. Remember the ATR "no raising taxes" pledge?
You and molly cant figure out which number is bigger can you. Or read even Eric's link stating Ford admitting they were late to supply shift. Or basically did no research even the HS level Eric provided.
Now. Let's talk about thr tax costs that arise from your chosen foreign worker import foreign manufacturer strategy. Which is bigger?
Apparently they were lying when they said they were built in America then.
They did *final assembly* in America.
Nobody claimed or thought that US companies were mining their own iron ore, refinihg it, etc.
Oh Shrike, you’re so desperate.
And apparently no one thought America was so silly as to actually have a domestic steel industry. Working in a steel mill is work that even Nick Gillespie OR regular Americans won't do.
Carmakers, including Ford and G.M., have so far avoided passing the cost of the tariffs along to consumers—but they won't be able to do that for long with the losses piling up.
Sure they can. Shutter the ruinous EV programs. It'll clear the books almost instantaneously.
Stop buying batteries and electrical components from China...
And should they stop buying imported steel too?
They are turning that debacle around now. Yes the US will be making steel again!
You seem pretty ignorant to the amount of resources that remain in the ground in America because of pro regulation assholes like yourself who think it is virtuous to have environmental standards here but not in 3rd world countries.
Meanwhile your preferred system keeps leading to shit like defective titanium from China that costs domestic businesses billions of dollars.
For the amount of money quoted, they could start a mine and refinery.
They are!
I never thought I’d see the day when “conservatives” defended taxes with the same arguments used by leftists.
“They can pay out of their profits!”
“They can pay by changing business practices!”
“They can pay by not spending money on things I don’t like!”
“It’s for the good of the country!”
“Taxes are patriotic!”
“If they can’t afford it they shouldn’t be in business!”
“Taxes have no cost!”
“Government can spend the money more wisely!”
And we can look forward to three and a half more years of this crap.
You voted for it.
Last time I voted was for Gary's Johnson.
As I said.
Um, saying that my not voting is voting is Tony “logic”.
Go look up the term "causation."
Try to understand why America embraced, of all people, Donald friggin' Trump. (Hint: it's not because they're nazis.)
You did that. With YOUR voting habits. You couldn't have just been sane the whole time. You had to empower the Democrats. They then drove their clown car off the cliff, and Trump/MAGA swooped in to fill the vacuum.
Liberal, classical liberal, libertarian, leftist, marxist, socialist - it's all the same thing now. A vaguely defined tent that shares one very common and outspoken value: utter hatred of America, American culture, and Americans. They will choose literally anything and everything over that. Every. Single. Time.
Trump/MAGA was the response. It was a response to your overconfidence that globalism and great replacement would succeed.
I'm not sure it was the correct response - but the American Left, in all its combined various incarnations, jumped the shark. You sound like you were on the motorcycle when it did, so this is on you.
I couldn't disagree more.
Try to understand why America embraced, of all people, Donald friggin' Trump. (Hint: it's not because they're nazis.)
Trump won with 49% of the popular vote and 32% of eligible voters. So 51% of the vote and 68% of eligible voters would disagree.
You did that. With YOUR voting habits.
I live in a deep blue state. My vote does not matter.
Liberal, classical liberal, libertarian, leftist, marxist, socialist - it's all the same thing now.
Ummm, no. Same in that they disagree with Trump, but that's about it. To say that they're the same is profoundly ignorant. Those terms have meaning. And they're definitely not the same.
A vaguely defined tent that shares one very common and outspoken value: utter hatred of America, American culture, and Americans.
Really? Because they outnumber Trumpians. And they're not shitting on the Constitution, destroying institutions and the rule of law. That's Trump. You seem to be describing conservatism. Well I've got news for you. The Trump administration is anti-conservative.
It was a response to your overconfidence that globalism and great replacement would succeed.
If by that you mean he tapped into ignorant populism, then yes. But he's taking us backwards, not forwards.
You sound like you were on the motorcycle when it did, so this is on you.
Dude, I don't vote because I'm not on a side. I think the choices all suck balls. That doesn't make me on the left. It puts me on the sidelines. And as I said before, words have meanings. I support freedom and liberty. I support the Constitution. I support separation of powers and limitations on powers. I support economic freedom. I think people should be able to do whatever they hell they want as long as they're not hurting others. The left opposes all of those things. And Trump does too.
The left redefines terms in order to change the plain meaning of laws and of the Constitution. Trump is doing that too.
The left loves taxes. Guess what, tariffs are taxes.
The left mocks our decadent lifestyle that in part comes from access to goods around the world. So does Trump.
The left scapegoats the rich and blames everything on them. Trump scapegoats immigrants and trade.
The left attacks anyone who disagrees with how they're doing things and accuses them of opposing their goal. So does Trump.
The left attacks court rulings they don't like by calling them "activist". Sound familiar?
The left only supports the Constitution when convenient. Again, sound familiar?
The left likes high income taxes because they believe they're sticking it to the rich. Trump and his followers support import taxes because they believe they're sticking it to foreigners.
The left is willfully ignorant of economics. So is Trump.
The left raises taxes on businesses and tells them to eat it. So does Trump.
Come on. Trump has got way more in common with "the left" than he does with conservatives.
Trump won with 49% of the popular vote and 32% of eligible voters.
Nobody cares about the popular vote. It's irrelevant. But you know what, for kicks and grins, lets run it through AI.
"The 200 largest cities in the U.S. account for approximately 25–26% of the total national population." So, 90 million people on the high side, out of a nation of 350ish million. (Total population, not voter population.)
"Of those 200 cities, they are roughly 70/30 Democrat to Republican." So, that generally means that 70% of the 25% of population that inhabits major cities votes blue. Republicans rock about 30% of the major cities.
The suburbs trend Republican, small-town America is heavily Republican, and full rural is almost entirely Republican. Meaning flyover America has a much stronger voice in Representative Government than urban America.
Probably why you leftists hate the Electoral College, right? (It's also why the By County voting maps make it seem like there are virtually no blue's in America at all.)
Should a cloistered collective of highly isolated but dense blue cities get to run roughshod over an extreme majority of Americans by demographic per capita?
Why should 25% of the nation decide everything for 75% of the 30% urban (and almost 100% of non-urban) nation just because they're numerous?
Nobody. Cares. About. The. Popular. Vote.
If you want a king, go find a monarchy. That's not how we do things in America.
I live in a deep blue state. My vote does not matter.
Actually, it does matter. It matters just as much as anyone else's. How much effort did you put into turning your blue state into a red state?
Ummm, no. Same in that they disagree with Trump, but that's about it. To say that they're the same is profoundly ignorant. Those terms have meaning.
They used to. Not anymore.
And they're not shitting on the Constitution, destroying institutions and the rule of law.
Don't really see where he's done that, per se - outside of "destroying institutions." But those were institutions that needed destroying. And I frankly hope he's not done swinging that wrecking ball.
Really? Because they outnumber Trumpians.
See above. They may outnumber them, but not in any way that is meaningfully measured or actually matters.
The Trump administration is anti-conservative.
I actually agree with that point.
If by that you mean he tapped into ignorant populism, then yes.
Of course that's what I mean. He's a 90s Democrat. He's following the same exact playbook that Democrats do - tap into ignorant populism (people like you) - only he flipped the script on it all. Which is what has the left so out of sorts and so violently angry with the guy.
Dude, I don't vote because I'm not on a side. I think the choices all suck balls. That doesn't make me on the left. It puts me on the sidelines.
Meaning the left.
I support freedom and liberty. I support the Constitution. I support separation of powers and limitations on powers. I support economic freedom. I think people should be able to do whatever they hell they want as long as they're not hurting others.
And yet, you don't vote for ANY of it. Weird.
“Meaning the left”
Only if you think opposition to Trump equals the left. Which is profoundly ignorant. The left supports more government and less freedom (as does Trump), which I oppose.
“And yet, you don't vote for ANY of it.”
That’s because there isn’t anyone running for office that supports any of those things. Certainly not Trump. He opposes all those things tooth and nail.
Only if you think opposition to Trump equals the left. Which is profoundly ignorant.
Is it though? Because they seem to have thoroughly united under that cause.
The left supports more government and less freedom (as does Trump), which I oppose.
And yet you support it just to spite Trump. Weird.
That’s because there isn’t anyone running for office that supports any of those things.
Nonsense. I found candidates every year to support. Did you even bother looking?
Why is it that you keep telling me that I support things after I tell you that I oppose them? Are you capable of having a conversation with a person, or can you only attack caricatures?
Well, to put it bluntly, I don't believe you. You don't get to reflexively hate Trump and then also be considered a reasonable person, sarc.
Heck, you don't get to be anything even remotely left-wing supporting and also be considered a reasonable person at this point. Like I said - the clown car has already flown off the cliff. If you're still even remotely "left" in this country, then you're no longer one to be taken seriously.
The Clown World Woke Globalist Rainbow Gaia Dream is dead, sarc. Dead, bloated, rotting, and now does nothing but stink.
If you're trying to get the stink off, I'd advise cutting ties with anything remotely left-wing at this point.
“Well, to put it bluntly, I don't believe you.”
Then there’s no point in conversing since you’re just going to tell me what I think and then argue in bad faith against what you made up. I gave you the benefit of the doubt. That was a mistake. I won’t make it again. Have fun being muted.
Then there’s no point in conversing since you’re just going to tell me what I think and then argue in bad faith against what you made up.
Are you voting blue or red, sarc?
If you're voting blue, which we all know you are, then don't pretend you're here in good faith. You're not going to re-legitimize the clown car. It's a flaming wreck at the bottom of the cliff and everyone inside is already dead.
As I said there is no point in conversing you. If I answer your question you will call me a liar and then argue against some leftist caricature in your head.
I made a mistake when I thought you were capable of behaving like a civilized human being. You can’t do it.
So fuck off and welcome to Muteville. You can join the others who relentlessly beg for my attention yet remain ignored because I honestly don’t care about anything they have to say.
I thought you were a man. I was wrong.
I’ve said this twice now. I won’t say it again. Toodles.
Oh look. Two grey boxes. One of them Jesse’s. That’s all you are now. Another Jesse. A pathetic troll.
You, AT, are now among equals.
See, he's still replying lol. I'll bet he mutes, and then clicks them open anyway just because he can't resist it.
No self-control. Hallmark leftist.
As I said there is no point in conversing you.
And yet here you are doing precisely that. Was it to inform me of your impending muting? Never understood that, ngl. But, of course, it's yet another symptom of your clown car leftism.
Hey guys, I just got muted by sarc! Who's pulled THAT off to date? 😀
No I likely actually didn't, but he'll probably keep appearances for a week or so if only to try and save some face.
In the meantime, it'll be nice to slap around his idiotic posts knowing he won't put up a fight.
...
I probably just ruined it, didn't I.
It always amuses me watching sarc claim others ignorant as he publicly supports narratives and views of the left constantly here.
He is a midwit at best. Highly ignorant of most topics he writes on.
In the last months we have seen him repeat Maddow talking points from Trump will stop elections to deportations are concentration camps to everyone on the right is racist.
He is full of shit.
From what I've read of your posts, you seem like a conservative. If that's the case you should oppose Trump and everything he stands for.
This is the ignorance.
You're darn right I'm a conservative. And I'm an OG#NT, for precisely that reason.
But that doesn't mean I'm going to be reflexively anti-Trump like you leftists are. I'm not going to oppose anything he's doing simply because HE'S the one doing it. That's just mindless partisanship, which it appears you're grossly guilty of.
If you’re a conservative then you have no business supporting any 80s Democrat who is against everything conservatives stand for. You accuse me of reflexively opposing him while you reflexively defend him. Looks like projection to me.
I do not reflexively defend him. I support him when he merits supporting, I do not when he does not.
You, on the other hand, seem to go exclusively with the latter having deemed him unworthy of ANY support simply because he's him.
I don’t oppose what he is doing because of who is doing it.
I oppose what he is doing because everything he does is in contempt of freedom, in contempt of liberty, in contempt of the Constitution, in contempt of separation of powers, in contempt of limits on powers, in contempt of rule of law, and everything else that libertarians stand for. He has more in common with the hard left than with conservatives or libertarians in that regard.
Stop feeling and start thinking.
No it's not.
That's weaponized empathy/virtue. That's you bastardizing terms like "freedom, liberty, Constitution, separation of powers, and rule of law" in order to use them against Americans.
We're done with that in 2025. You better figure out a new tack.
Somehow in your twisted head you managed to turn Trump's tax cuts into democrat talking points.
Are you paid directly by Soros and/or the Killary foundation or is there a middle man like Media Matters involved?
Somehow is your twisted head you managed to defend Trump's taxes with Democrat talking points.
Are you paid directly by Trump and/or the Koch brothers or is there a middle man like Truth Social involved?
Nah, i'm done.
Good. Will you be slashing your wrists, swallowing pills, or hanging yourself?
Eric,
Assembled is a bit different than "building". Ford is ASSEMBLING cars in the US using foreign parts. There's the problem.
If it wasn't for misleading articles, you would have no articles at all.
You know whats really funny about this article and thread. Eric and the other retards have gone from predicting rising costs, economic collapse, recessions to now pretending that if tariffs add a single penny to any chain of the economic system, they were the ones who were right.
It is fucking pathetic lol.
And MAGA has gone from "tariffs are a miracle that will balance the trade deficit and bring back manufacturing" to "they don't cause that much damage...yet...if you know where not to look and rationalize away bad economic data."
And the bulk of the tariffs were delayed until this week.
Speaking of fucking pathetic white Mike's lol.
Mike has also said...
Nobody on theft is calling Sydney Sweeney a nazi...
Investigation into russiagate started on Jan 20 is to deflect from epstein....
Conservatives were outraged abou5 south park.
Not a single lie/narrative switch Mike won't adopt.
Slow down. You seem very confused and flustered. Are you talking about real Mike or making up fantasies about me?
Because the only one of those I've said is "Investigation into russiagate started on Jan 20 is to deflect from epstein".
Now tell us how much DOMESTIC TAXES Ford paid in domestic resources.
Playing oblivious to the other side of the coin isn't making a case; it's indoctrinating an agenda.