Trump Is Openly Using the Presidency To Enrich the Trump Brand
And generations of allegedly anti-corruption Republicans just don't care.

The president of the United States on Tuesday held a ribbon-cutting ceremony in Balmedie, Scotland, to mark the opening of the new Trump International Golf Links, owned by his family (at least until he exits the White House), and designed by his son Eric.
In his cheery promotional remarks, Donald Trump thanked the media ("today they're not fake news, they're wonderful news"), gave a shout-out to his daughter-in-law ("Lara, I want to thank you, the head of the Republican Party"), and praised various dignitaries on hand.
"I want to thank, by the way, the prime minister, who was here last night, and who was really very gracious; loves the place," he said, referencing the United Kingdom's Keir Starmer, who also joined Trump at another of his Scottish golf properties before hopping on Air Force One with the Trump clan for a sneak peek at Balmedie. "This will," the commander in chief predicted, "be a tremendously successful place."
When it comes to the success of real estate developments, as well as name-branded consumer goods and value-shedding meme coins, it is very good indeed to be the president. During his first term, Trump leveraged his office to funnel more business toward properties such as the Trump International Hotel three blocks from the White House. But "since returning to the White House," Jack Shafer noted in a perceptive and detailed Washington Post article three weeks ago, "Trump has hastened the hustle."
To wit:
The Wall Street Journal reported in May that Trump encourages Republican officials to stage events at his clubs, where he often appears. His latest financial disclosure statement showed him earning about $57 million from his investment in a Trump-family cryptocurrency company. The family has also raised $2 billion to start a bitcoin-mining company and created new meme coins. His Mar-a-Lago resort brings in about $50 million and his golf course and resort company brings in another $119 million. The disclosure also details royalties from his Trump Bible operations ($1.3 million), Trump sneakers and scents ($2.5 million), watches ($2.8 million), and about $1 million for a Trump guitar. The Trumps are peppercorning the globe with real estate developments in which the partners are foreign governments and foreign interests. The intertwining of the family's global business interests with foreign actors — some of whom might be directly affected by the trade policy and diplomacy he commands — will make it hard to distinguish national interest from private enrichment.
And this is only a short list of Trump's rent-seeking exploits.
The scale and brazenness of these self-dealings make previous White House personal-enrichment scandals look quaint. Hunter Biden leveraged his father's name and station to obtain an otherwise unfathomable $1.2 million gig for a Ukrainian oil company; Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, six months after leaving his foreign policy gig at the White House, had his private equity firm receive $2 billion from Saudi Arabia's government-owned sovereign wealth fund. The younger Biden reportedly peddled what has been described as "the illusion of access" to his father (Republicans say it was more real than that); Trump this May straight-up sold access to a gala dinner with him to the 220 top buyers of his $TRUMP meme coin, generating $148 million in $TRUMP sales that evening alone.
Some of us are old enough to remember Republican outrage over Bill Clinton's political contributions rental of the Lincoln Bedroom; his cash-for-pardon of Marc Rich, or even Billy Carter's beer brand back in 1977. Democrats, too, were once fond of needling the gilded failsonning of Neil Bush. Such scandals could fuel late-night comedy for weeks at a time, back when there was still late-night comedy.
Now there is mostly shrugging, and not just because of the inscrutability/ickiness of the word "emoluments." Democrats and their allies in the media have spent the better part of a decade looking at Trump's litany of dubious personal dealings as not just a broader character condemnation, but rather as potential fodder for a non-ballot box knockout blow to Trump's political career. This frequently gives off the impression—and not just to Republican voters—of opportunism, of lawfare, of boys who might be crying wolf.
Also, at any given moment of such a frenetic and aggressive presidency, there are a good half-dozen governing issues more pressing and injurious than the old huckster opening up another golf course. Trump's grubbiness is baked in and seemingly unchangeable; his tariff and immigration policies, on the other hand, seem subject to legal and political challenge.
Among the vast swaths of GOP office holders and political professionals who have expressed umbrage at Democratic self-dealing yet sat on their hands while a Republican president has spelunked to unseen ethical depths, there seem to be three main explanations, none of them satisfying: Either they just don't see the problem, or it's the price for participating in a two-party system where this particular politician is enduringly potent, or they never really meant that stuff about virtue anyway.
I sincerely hope the answer isn't the latter. Bill and Hillary Clinton are ethical grotesques; dispensing access for cash, seeding intelligence agencies with politicized data on political opponents, and making cavalier accusations of treason. Joe Biden spent half a century in public life lying his face off, and created an elaborate censorship regime. Unethical and anti-virtuous behavior among politicians is ever and always worthy of condemnation, particularly from the vast majority of us whose salaries do not depend on the partisan outcome of elections.
We will not soon get better politicians by shrugging at the corruptions on our team, or even grudgingly accepting that it's all a dirty business, so whaddya gonna do? The president of the United States should not be using prime ministers (even British ones!) to hawk his private businesses and enrich his offspring. In your heart, you know I'm right.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ya this is bad.
Predicted 5+ months ago, reason commenters backward, defensive, butthurt, deeply obsolete and BEHIND as always. YAAAAAAWWWWWNNN.
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
It's "Red Wedding" Welch samefagging his own article.
The most revolting part is the barrage of lies and twisted half-truths.
He drags out Trump organization business investments made by companies that long predate Trump’s entry into politics, and holds them up as vague insinuations of a scam. A scam he never defines, never explains. Just slime and innuendo. He says there’s wrongdoing, but can’t say what. Does he think we’re all idiots?
Trump was already a billionaire before politics and lost money by becoming president. This is unlike Welch’s beloved Democrats, who mysteriously always become millionaires after taking office in the complete inverse of Trump’s story.
And when the company Kushner is a part of were asked to invest a portion of the Saudi sovereign wealth fund? That came after Trump had left office, when he was persona non grata in Washington.
The Saudis gained no influence by dealing with the family of a man who’d been falsely impeached, was banned from the internet and was being dragged through countless frivolous investigations. They had no crystal ball saying he would regain his office.
Contrast that with the Bidens, who were peddling influence and taking bribes while Joe was still Vice President.
But of course, Welch knows this. He’s not ignorant, he’s dishonest. He’s cashing brown envelopes.
That’s right, Matt. You’re getting paid to be a hack. The very thing you pretend to expose, you’ve become.
This is unlike Welch’s beloved Democrats, who mysteriously always become millionaires after taking office in the complete inverse of Trump’s story.
Needs more "career politician". This is key to Friedman and other's point about politics and corruption. The market makes apprentice bricklayers into construction engineers, retail workers into regional or national managers, nurses into directors of hospital networks. The government makes someone who clerks for a law firm run by a politician for a few years into a career politician or a pencil-pushing desk pogue to the head of a regulatory agency. The bricklayer, even after learning the STEM to be an engineer, has to learn about supply chains, personnel management, project management, responding to the market. The law clerk learns to take the right money out of the market and give it to the right people. If no buildings get built, the bricklayer turned engineer is a failure. If the real estate developer can't get a golf course built, he's a failure. But if no laws get passed, or even get violated, or a million people die because of the actions of the head of a regulatory agency, several times, they're a hero just for having an ass to fill a seat for four decades at more than six figures a year; what matters is that the wealth gets transferred.
https://mobile.twitter.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12 “Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know. #RedWedding2”
That’s the full quote. Did Welch call for “…all conservative writers be invited to a red-wedding style mass-slaughter…”? If in your fevered dreams, he WAS calling for that, was it for the party-going writers to be the dishers-out of the violence, as the victims, or as mere spectators? If as spectators, for their amusement, or to demonstrate the real horrors of real violence to them? Or, to see MOVIES about red weddings? … Y’all LOVE to rush to judgments, without any data, don’t you? Whenever doing so, fits YOUR story line!
https://gameofthrones.fandom.com/wiki/Red_Wedding for reference
Are YOU criticizing Welch for this questionable-meaning(s) allusion? I, for one, would urge adults who want to understand the ugliness of violence and revenge, to see “Clockwork Orange”. That has ZERO to do with me threatening ANYONE!!! Hello?!?!
“Party at my place. Invite your teenaged relatives and friends. #StarWars”
Did I just issue an invitation to blow up (“I sense disturbances in the Force”) entire planets full of teenagers, using Death Stars? … Well, yes, if you hate me and my kind, and honesty means NOTHING to you, I could see you using my party invitation that way, sure…
I’m sorry that you suffer under the illusion that you know exactly what Matt Welch meant by that. There are MANY possible interpretations!
Below is my interpretation:
He meant that the conservatives should be invited to a party in which “Red Wedding” is screened for all viewers, so that conservatives (ESPECIALLY Trump-cultist conservatives) could learn exactly WHAT it is like, to be invited to a party, in order for KILLINGS to happen! And then maybe the Party of Trump Cultists will STOP inviting YOU to THEIR Party, in which democracy is deliberately murdered!!! (I know that it is WAAAAY too much to ask, that they should actually STOP trying to murder democracy, there in the Trump-Cult Party.)
Lmfao
Yep, you’re a retarded clown, and it is funny.
Sevo is being kind to you. No, really.
You're a punk cartridge too.
Read this again, asswipe. It's true:
"Sevo is being kind to you. No, really."
Biden influence peddling and no-bid contract bad? Pelosi insider trading bad? NGO kickback bad? Oh, right, it's hysterical baseless pants shitting from commies that don't give a shit about corruption except as a weapon against their enemies. GFY you commie cunt.
Because before he was elected Trump never opened a hotel
Nice bleat.
It’s only corrupt when Democrats do it. Right and wrong are determined by who not what.
But it’s ok if they do it first!
When Trump does it, he's just being a good businessman (never mind all the bankruptcies).
Youre not very intelligent are you.
Sockasmic had spoken. Two accounts; twice the TDS.
Uhm, so.... that TDS thing you guys keep talking about... I think it's getting a little more popular lately... uhm... and there may be... like... reasons for that... :)))
Pray for a vaccine.
I’m hoping it’s terminal.
There is a lot of derangement around Trump. People truly believe that actions have different results when Trump does them, as if by magic. That is truly deranged.
There is a lot of derangement around Trump.
No shit, Sherlock, and you’ve got it really damn bad.
I understand you're seething, but I think you skipped the rationale.
I think you skipped learning to think; it shows.
And you sound like you skipped straight to being an old man.
Obviously, no one with intelligence hoped to make a point there, shitstain.
Quit sockpuppeting.
What sock thingy are you talking about, right-wing non-individual?
Yeah. That.
No bitch, YOU are seething. We won, you lost. And you continue to lose. Best you learn to obey, or just GTFO. Or else things will get real fucking bad for you.
Sorry about Colbert losing $40M/yr and getting cancelled.
LOL moron. I've been lurking for years and when most of this board went full retard I decided to start posting. If you don't like my posts, mute me.
And you would have gotten away with too if it weren’t for those darned kids and that dog.
"I've been lurking for years"
Just like Alberto Balsam and Ali Akbar Alexander, Dajjal and AddictionMyth.
Ah, you were waiting to join your fellow retards. Makes sense. You wanted to be among your fellow democrats.
"...I've been lurking for years.."
And you should have continued instead of outing yourself as a TDS-addled lying pile of slimy lefty shit,
When Fu Manchu posts, he's being a TDS-addled slimy pile of lying lefty shit.
According to sarc nothing is ever sufficiently proven when it's a Dem. Foreign governments hand out million dollar jobs to crackheads with no relevant experience or history of accomplishment all the time.
your things to whine about meter is broken.
Let's not get caught up in whose brother totally legally promoted beer and whose sneaker brand is, somehow, rent-seeking. Point is, we aren't talking about the fact that the DNC for the last two administrations has been more unconstitutional, disruptive, morally bankrupt, and outright oppressively illegal than any President back to Lincoln (maybe inclusive).
How are Don Jr’s paintings doing?
“Mom-ala they cancelled my modeling contract!!!”
-stolen from glibs
And generations of allegedly anti-corruption Republicans just don't care
Yeah, no shit. Because being anti-corruption doesn't actually prevent any corruption it just prevents you from getting in on the grift. It's like you dickwads haven't been paying attention for the last half century of moral conservatism.
Matter of fact, simply listing the family's sources of income rather than explicitly laying out how that money is taken from taxpayers is more of the same "Stochastic Marxism" bullshit where USAID money going directly into politician's pockets is dishonestly compared with "rent-seeking" of selling your own sneakers and watches.
You fucking 'red wedding' asshat.
Matt might be hoping for a red golf tournament.
Or maybe a red wedding at a Trump golf course?
Welchie should remember what happened to the perpetrators of that red wedding.
Season 7, Episode 1:
Welch would do good to remember that when he tries his red wedding crap again.
https://mobile.twitter.com/mattwelch/status/1102654202545913857?s=12 “Now would be a good time to throw a big cocktail party in New York or Washington, and invite every single conservative writer you know. #RedWedding2”
That’s the full quote. Did Welch call for “…all conservative writers be invited to a red-wedding style mass-slaughter…”? If in your fevered dreams, he WAS calling for that, was it for the party-going writers to be the dishers-out of the violence, as the victims, or as mere spectators? If as spectators, for their amusement, or to demonstrate the real horrors of real violence to them? Or, to see MOVIES about red weddings? … Y’all LOVE to rush to judgments, without any data, don’t you? Whenever doing so, fits YOUR story line!
https://gameofthrones.fandom.com/wiki/Red_Wedding for reference
Are YOU criticizing Welch for this questionable-meaning(s) allusion? I, for one, would urge adults who want to understand the ugliness of violence and revenge, to see “Clockwork Orange”. That has ZERO to do with me threatening ANYONE!!! Hello?!?!
“Party at my place. Invite your teenaged relatives and friends. #StarWars”
Did I just issue an invitation to blow up (“I sense disturbances in the Force”) entire planets full of teenagers, using Death Stars? … Well, yes, if you hate me and my kind, and honesty means NOTHING to you, I could see you using my party invitation that way, sure…
I’m sorry that you suffer under the illusion that you know exactly what Matt Welch meant by that. There are MANY possible interpretations!
Below is my interpretation:
He meant that the conservatives should be invited to a party in which “Red Wedding” is screened for all viewers, so that conservatives (ESPECIALLY Trump-cultist conservatives) could learn exactly WHAT it is like, to be invited to a party, in order for KILLINGS to happen! And then maybe the Party of Trump Cultists will STOP inviting YOU to THEIR Party, in which democracy is deliberately murdered!!! (I know that it is WAAAAY too much to ask, that they should actually STOP trying to murder democracy, there in the Trump-Cult Party.)
Now you’re getting it. This is what must happen to the hardcore Marxist democrats. America will not survive their continued existence.
His Mar-a-Lago resort brings in about $50 million and his golf course and resort company brings in another $119 million.
And this-
In his pre-trial ruling, Judge Engoron noted that the Palm Beach County Assessor appraised the market value of Mar-a-Lago at between $18 million and $27.6 million.
C'mon Reason, tell us how this works. You and the other TDSers swore he committed fraud.
Listening to ignorant leftist twats like Welch whine about business matters they can’t possibly understand is hilarious. He clearly knows nothing about real estate, nor business in general. Has he ever even bought a house, or run any sort of business?
I doubt Welch could competently manage a child’s lemonade stand, not that I would want him near any children. He might try to trans them.
'...I doubt Welch could competently manage a child’s lemonade stand..."
Welch has been 'managing' far less than a lemonade stand; he has no stock-holders (not "stake-holders") to satisfy. He is, simply a swamp-dweller TDS addled slimy pile of lying shit who would do the world a favor by fucking off and dying.
The assessed land value and the actual income generated are not necessarily the same though they may have correlation.
"...may have correlation..."
Cut prices for your lemonade; you're making too much money.
Every Single Politician does it. How did Obama afford all those multi-million dollar mansions? Would that have anything to do with giving speeches for $100K a pop? Hillary and Bill taking all those "donations" to her charity?
Gimme a break. Unless you complained about all that crap, this is just more TDS. What do you want Trump to do, rename his hotels to "Doe 1"?
Welch would much rather have the government seize Trump’s businesses and asset, while he rots in prison. All while Kamala reigns supreme. Welch is just another leftist traitor, cosplaying as a libertarian. So he can be an ‘edgy’ political hipster. But well within the boundaries of acceptable democrat behavior.
"Hunter Biden leveraged his father's name and station to obtain an otherwise unfathomable $1.2 million gig for a Ukrainian oil company"
And then the Dems impeached Trump for trying to leverage foreign aid to get Ukraine to re-open their investigation into the Biden corruption which the Bidens had shut down using foreign aid leverage. Nice of you to leave that out. How much was an impeachment worth, in corrupt BidenDollars?
After Trump enriches Himself at the expense of American tax money, on ALL of His MANY Glorious Golf Courses and real estates of various kinds... He turns around and SCREWS out of honest earnings, through tariffs, many-many hard-working low-paid garment workers in South East Asia, who DARE to try to make an honest (if low-paid) living, serving willing American buyers!!! This GREEDY and EVIL man has ZERO shame! If there really IS a just God, then Trump will BURN... Or be reincarnated 10,000 times ass an abused, exploited poor person! For the glory of the rich and powerful!
I'll assume your comment is sarcastic. Nobody could be that stupid, otherwise.
Why is shit stupid to take the sides of hard-working, honest, low-paid peons, over the greedy, powerful, abusive, and rich liars and exploiters? 'Cause might makes right, and "Team R" Uber Alles?
I hate to break shit to ya, butt no matter HOW much Orange Dick Ye PervFectly suck, Dear Orange Leader is SNOT gonna "share" His Queen Spermy Daniels with YOU! Ye of the busted bubble...
You underestimate his idiocy.
Yeah, that's nothing compared to when he's really off his meds.
I have duly noted that NONE of Ye PervFected (and Mind-Infected, and neglected) Trump Toadies have refuted a DAMNED THING that I have written.
Also I refute Ye by SNOT reading twat Ye have written, and by calling Ye "poopy heads"! So there!
See?
Yes, the wise and benevolent DO see that Ye PervFectly have... NOTHING!!!
You are so stupid that you are seemingly unaware that Donald Trump was a billionaire decades before he became president.
From the article:
Lately, Trump has been STRONGLY pressuring the Federal Reserve Board to greatly lower short-term interest rates - the overnight rate or the discount rate. One could contend that he is so adamant because he wants to be able to finance his One Big Bloated Bill without having to pay a lot of interest and without causing a credit crunch. Maybe that's why he's that adamant. Or,...
Or, maybe he stands to HUGELY gain, personally, in his private enterprises, from low interest rates. Consider that Trump is a real estate dude. That's how his family got it's wealth - purchase, development, operation of, sales and rental of real estate - residential and commercial. And, Trump and his family retain HUGE real estate holdings, virtually all of their estate. An economic question for ya - will the lowering of interest rates increase or decrease the market prices of real estate? We're pretty much all free-marketeers here; we know the answer to that question - if buyers can borrow more with the same mortgage payments, they'll borrow more to compete for the same amount of real estate, thereby driving prices up.
Trump does not seem to be much of an Austrian School guy, seems to be somewhat of an inflationist if it suits his political or his personal private business purposes.
Or maybe a "HUGELY" TDS-addled pile of shit offers bullshit.
I don't need to insult you to make my point. If you had any valid point, you'd have logically made it. Are you sure you're not a liberal posing as a conservatarian troll to make conservatives and libertarians look bad?
“….he stands to HUGELY gain, personally….. from low interest rates.”
So, pretty much like the last 17 years? Yeah, no, I don’t think that’s the motivation. Lol.
It is a mistake to expect President Trump to be an Austrian School guy -- particularly when, to be fair, we should concede that pretty much no one in American politics is -- and thus, President Trump pushing for low interest rates is perfectly consistent with the claim that President Trump wants to see the economy grow.
Even Calvin Coolidge -- pretty much the only modern President we've had who espoused the "to fix the economy, it's best to do nothing" -- pushed for lower interest rates.
Yeah, Trump wants the economy to grow. It's already growing. He's pushing for a 3 percentage point cut down to 1.3 or so. That would likely overheat the economy and inflate stock prices like in the ROARING '20s paving the way for a hard crash and a depression like 1929 and the '30s. Yeah, just like Coolidge did. The Fed of Coolidge's time lowered rates in the early '20s, thereby driving the DJIA from 63.90 in 1921 to 381.17 in 1929 before the crash - a nearly 6-fold increase, only to crash down hard to 41.22 in 1932, lower than the 1921 bottom.
https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Dow-Jones-Industrial-Average-Daily-Chart-1920-1940_fig3_254458444
No one is saying that the Fed should raise rates. The discount rate was raised in 1929 prior to the crash, mainly to curb stock speculation, possibly help set off the 1929 crash.
Now, as of this writing 7 Aug 25, the stock indices are looking a little "toppy" near all time highs. Whether it's an actual top, only time will tell. Maybe Trump is crazy like a fox - pushing for 3 point cut in discount or overnight rate so as to obtain a 1 point or lower rate cut - just enough to keep the indices from falling much, but not enough to cause an inflationary boom with ensuing crash.
Only time will tell.
"The President shall...not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them."
"No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."
Yet another part of the Constitution that Trump violates.
How do you explain politicians giving $100K speeches?
Unless the money is foreign it is ok.
It is very often foreign.
So…… now what?
I'll add emoluments as another words retard leftists dont understand.
Did you know Washington was a farmer who sold products? Jefferson sold tobacco?
I strongly suspect Molly doesn’t as she’s totally retarded.
‘She’ is Tony. So a he/she at best.
No wonder everyone hates Washington and Jefferson.
Sarc would like them if they distilled whiskey.
Washington did.
https://www.mountvernon.org/the-estate-gardens/distillery
Washington did it before the Dems.
I'm sure democrats claim him like they do Lincoln.
If sarc had worked for Washington at Mount Vernon, you think he would steal the whiskey and blame it on the slaves?
Nope. Try again Tony. And are you willing to acknowledge your abject stupidity yet?
"Hunter Biden leveraged his father's name and station to obtain an otherwise unfathomable $1.2 million gig for a Ukrainian oil company; Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner, six months after leaving his foreign policy gig at the White House, had his private equity firm receive $2 billion from Saudi Arabia's government-owned sovereign wealth fund. "
MAGA Cult members don't know the difference between million and billion.
How much value do you put on Biden leveraging billions in foreign aid to bribe Ukraine to drop their corruption investigation into Hunter?
How much value do you put on impeaching Trump because he used that same leverage to get Ukraine to restart their corruption investigation?
LOL you guys believe everything you're told to believe. Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor because he _wasn't_ investigating corruption because he was corrupt. There's no proof Biden was working in the interests of Hunter or that Biden got a 10% kickback or anything your handlers made up.
Yeah, Biden gave pardons for crimes that hadn't been committed.
Biden gave pre-pardons for crimes suck ass SNOT bowing LOW before The Emperor Trump! Sad to say, Biden, being old, lacked the imagination and data to pardon 11,364,462 individuals who will soon be "deported", w/o trials, to be tortured in El Salvador... IF ONLY Biden could have foreseen, and pardoned the 11,364,462 individuals ahead of time!
Yeah a prosecutor investigating Burisma. Are you really going to die on that hill? Try to do better.
Who was too corrupt to prosecute (probably paid off). That's why he was targeted.
He was targeted because he was targeting corruption, but you're too stupid or ideologically possessed to understand anything
He was prosecuting them and the oligarch behind them fled Ukraine.
Biden had him fired, the replacement ended the investigation a month later and the oligarch returned.
Just sayin'
Nope. You probably think that the our embassy in Libya was attacked because of an obscure YouTube video too.
God you're a fucking retard. Everything you say is 3 year old Maddow bullshit devoid of actual facts.
"LOL"
Are they going to let you into middle school this Autumn?
"...you guys believe everything you're told to believe..."
Only the true stuff, unlike TDS-addled slimy piles of lying lefty shit, TDS-addled slimy pile of lying lefty shit.
There's no proof Biden was working in the interests of Hunter or that Biden got a 10% kickback or anything your handlers made up.
As long as we agree the standard of proof is whatever it needs to be to determine the Dem is innocent In reality we had direct testimony from Hunter and Joe's accomplice, emails referencing their plan, and pictures of Biden with the targets (after Joe claimed he was never part of Hunter's business operation and didn't know his customers). This is enough to convict if it weren't a political case where half the population will refuse to accept anything.
"Biden's not senile, those are cheapfakes!".
How does it feel to be so gullible you'll defend literally anything?
Again, this is why the democrats have to go away forever. We can’t keep them around. It’s gone too far.
Sumbitch is too stupid to experience embarrassment.
See, even if the allegations about the prosecutor was true, Biden was uniquely disqualified from making that demand, because his son was working for the energy company that was the target of the investigation. CONFLICT OF INTEREST - it’s not a hard concept.
Trump encouraging the GOP to use his facilities certainly raises some eyebrows. If he actually threatened to withhold funding or endorsement on refusal, he’d be in trouble.
Corrupt prosecutors are dime a dozen. Zelenskyy is corrupt as fuck. Even the EU is withholding some aid now. How often do you see vice presidents visiting that country personally and threaten to withhold aid until the prosecutor is fired?
Do you get the picture now?
Mostly a Trump supporter but not going to defend him on some of this. The fact that his existing businesses still make money is not graft or rent seeking. The buyer still has the option to beware. And for an existing enterprise to expand despite his presidency isn't graft either for the same reason. The Clintons, Obamas, Pelosis and Bidens built there enormous fortunes entirely on influence peddling. Not equivalent. The only one that bothers me is the meme coin. Just a souvenir for most buyers probably but in the crypto world it seems a sucker is born every minute. A bad look to me but not like firing a prosecutor in Ukraine to save your son's phoney baloney job.
Meme coin is no different than Joe getting 10M for a memoir nobody will read.at least the coin is market based.
Ok. l hear Kamala is selling a book right now. Pretty sure nobody will buy it but she'll make millions. I'm actually a crypto believer but these stupid meme coins really pollute the market so just a bias of mine. But I can't fix stupid.
It’s probably ghost written as I can’t imagine Kamala being able to write or read anything other than a picture book.
There's a big enough market for her book.
The blue hairs don't like spending their own money.
Being drunk never stopped Hemingway.
Yes, but Hemingway wasn’t a babbling idiot when he was sober.
You don't know that... There is no evidence that hemmingway was ever sober
Ha! Fair enough.
Around the world in 80000 chardonays
Kamala is an incredibly stupid drunken cunt. No wonder Sarc loves her so much.
Gee, I wonder how much in kickbacks Biden and his company, Burisma, got for sending the Ukraine $120 billion?
'Trump Is Openly Using the Presidency To Enrich the Trump Brand'
OMG! Why can't Trump run a normal Presidency, and at least try to hide his (and his families) corruption?
Holy shit. Searched Clinton Foundation to see what Reason said... looks at Sullum go. All conspiracy theory.
https://reason.com/search/%22Clinton%20Foundation%22/
That's a lot of articles repeating the same quote while not actually digging into what that story is.
That's how you brainwash readers and poison an LLM. How you get brain dead zombies uttering "Good Samaritan" and "1A of the internet" to each other as fellow internet travelers are beaten, mugged, and deplatformed.
And american presidents and politicians left and right continue to demonstrate to those most affected by scarcity that there is absolutely nothing and nobody out there who gives a hint of a damn about their petty little money problems or little prosperity and life goal concerns. The revolution they voted for, especially the younger ones, by giving trump their 'X' turns out to be just another useless iteration of old people in cahoots, acting high and mighty and displaying their unearned wealth while showing nothing for it in terms of skill or wisdom. And the disillusionment and disaffection continues to run deeper and deeper.
You guys think this is gonna do anything eventually? Im excited to see. 🙂
Poor, poor victim. The world is against you, isn't it? Well, there must be a safe space somewhere nearby. Go in it and STAY, whiny bastard.
Im independently wealthy Mr. Dumbshit, all that differentiates me from bitter, abandoned, lonely losers like you is caring about others.
No, you’re on welfare. And if you ever went to college, it was almost certainly for some grievance studies degree. You’re stupid, worthless, and another pinko that will eventually be put down like a rabid animal. Which is essentially what you are.
Nobody believes your bullshit.
If you haven't been living under a rock in the last 40 years (quite a bit before i was around), you should know what im talking about. Unless youre a damn rock yourself.
More unsupported bullshit. Got more?
Just so you whining assholes know (yes, the TDS-addled lying pile of shit Sullum also):
"President-Elect Trump Will Forgo Presidential Salary For Second Term"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/president-elect-trump-will-forgo-presidential-salary-for-second-term/ar-AA1vxH9N
Shame on him for living on his businesses and not taking taxpayer money!
For the actual facts in full, see https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/07/11/fact-check-donald-trump-donates-salary-but-he-still-makes-money/5410134002/
Trump will not be involved in managing family business as president, company says
https://www.reuters.com/business/trump-will-separate-himself-family-business-wsj-reports-2025-01-10/
President Trump Resigns from Businesses, Leaves Sons CEO in Charge
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/president-trump-resigns-businesses-leaves-sons-cfo-charge-n711156
Take your TDS conspiracy theories and shove them where the sun doesn't shine.
What about all the money Trump was giving to Tesla? That's totes corrupt and all!
Good comment. Learn your place, and keep it that way.
Or show some decency: Fuck off and die.
Now do Biden, Obama, and Clinton.
Is it actually corruption though?
All the President's use the enhancement of their brands in order to lucrative post-office deals. The issue is using the power *of the office* to coerce money and favor - not using their enhanced brand.
You all, for example, have no problem with Billy Beer? You even give the Clinton Foundation a pass - despite Hillary openly using her influence in response to 'donations'.
So forgive me if you concern for Trump seems to be about the man rather than what he is doing to me.
Lately, Trump has been using the power of the office to BIGLY pressure the Federal Reserve to HUGELY lower interest rates. Trump and family have HUGE real estate holdings which would increase HUGELY in market value if interest rates were lowered. Even worse, any renter or aspiring homeowner would find it harder to buy property as people could take out larger loans for the same mortgage payment, the price of housing would be bid way up as all that money would compete for the same amount of housing. Trump and family would definitely benefit. But, in the long-term the renter and aspiring homeowner would be put at a disadvantage as supply of housing would more lag behind demand.
That’s somewhat true, but incidental. Based on Fed criteria, do you not believe that current conditions warrant rate cuts? Because that’s the only thing that matters.
I really wish we could get to the point where the only criteria for determining interest rates is "what the lender and the borrower agree as to what it should be".
We have decades of the Fed trying to manipulate the interest rates to end the business cycle -- and decades more of government doing that even before the Fed got involved -- and all we see is endless business cycles!
True Austrian Economics will never work, because it will never be tried!
^^This.
No they would not increase in value. Try again.
Real estate doesn't increase in price with lower interest rates? Historically, it does. With lower interest rates, buyers can borrow more money with the same mortgage payment, and can afford to pay higher prices. More money in the market, drives prices up.
“His latest financial disclosure statement showed him earning about $57 million from his investment in a Trump-family cryptocurrency company. The family has also raised $2 billion to start a bitcoin-mining company and created new meme coins. His Mar-a-Lago resort brings in about $50 million and his golf course and resort company brings in another $119 million. The disclosure also details royalties from his Trump Bible operations ($1.3 million), Trump sneakers and scents ($2.5 million), watches ($2.8 million), and about $1 million for a Trump guitar.”
None of those meet the definition of rent-seeking. Most of them were his basic hucking to supporters who will buy anything brand Trump (as is their prerogative).
“The Trumps are peppercorning the globe with real estate developments in which the partners are foreign governments and foreign interests. “
Considering how the rest of the world deals with other American companies, this isn’t that shocking. A real journalist might have tried to back up what they were alluding to by showing favorable treatment by the Administration for countries dealing with the families business interests.
Sorry Matt, these examples just aren’t in the same ballpark as your examples of Democrat malfeasance. The closest one might be the Saudi deal, except for the fact it was 6 months after Trump had left the White House and his political future was uncertain at best (remember we were always days away from a bombshell that would see him behind bars).
I even take issue with the retarded depiction of the Saudi deal. Especially after 50 yrs. of back alley war profiteering to the tune of trillions of dollars. Matt's moral and economic failure to even explain or justify how even $2B in open and direct exchange for a peace accord is worth anything other than hitting him in the face with a bat. Obama dropped pallets of cash on Iran while they were destabilizing the region and we're criticizing Hitler's Jewish son-in-law for making a deal with Muslim princes to generate peace and *maybe* getting payment *from them* on the back end?
Maybe there's a story there. $2B to perpetuate the conflict in Yemen with billions more in US military aid... or something... but Welch doesn't even bother to speculate or provide a known-facts tit-for-tat. Just "Ignore my words and the facts and agree with my meaning" horseshit.
Somebody cement Welch's feet and toss him in the river. The US, Reason, libertarianism, journalism... he's a liability, not an asset.
Welch, like most of the Reason staff, is a leftist. And like most of the Reason staff, he cosplays at being a libertarian, within acceptable democrat limits. He’s just a leftist political hipster who claims to be a libertarian because he wants a Soros ‘open society’ borderless utopia. Just like Boehm, Sullum, Lancaster, etc..
I disagree. There's a lot of conservatarian commenters at this site. Unless Reason is pushing conservatism, they won't be happy. What happened to all the hard money anti-inflationist conservatives?
There's a reason for that; libertarianism aligns with conservatism far more than 'liberalism', especially the modern version of 'liberalism', which it seems you favor.
I want my mommy!
Signed,
Reason
Newsflash: They're all using their elected positions to enrich themselves. This is nothing new. Looking at you Nancy Pelosi. This is why people that are not skilled in any art become politicians. We have a system of open corruption in this country. It's obvious and well known and yet, we all support directly or indirectly.
BTW, Welsh is a lying pile of slimy TDS-addled shit.
He's just not a conservative.
Wrong. You're just a 'liberal'. Fuck off and die.
It would be nice if we could all witness you live in this forum as you internalize all your genocidal Zionist psychological babble into one giant gulp and choke yourself to death. Ah but unfortunately that is probably going to happen in a dark corner of your garage. Oh well.
Oh, goodie! One more antisemite shit shows up.
Fuck off and die, shitstain.
With all your insultingness, are you sure you're not a liberal troll posing as a conservative so as to make conservatives look bad? Exactly what have I written that is not libertarian?
Apples and oranges. High level Dem corruption mostly involves quid pro quo payoffs. Good old fashioned bribery. Clinton’s and Biden’s for sure. Probably a bit for Obama too. Plus, insider trading, by for example, Nancy Palzy.
With Trump it’s pure name recognition. No quid pro quod. With very few exceptions, DJT has no idea who plays his golf courses around the world, No one is playing his courses in order to bribe Trump. For the most part, people play his courses because they are some of the best in the world.
Not dissimilarly, we own a couple of units at Trump International in Las Vegas. We started going there during the interegnum, because the hotel is very quiet and has excellent beds. Their value is up a bit since the election, due to name recognition, and his boys are netting a bit more for the units that they are selling. But none of them know who owns units there, who is renting, and who is visiting. Again, no quid pro quo. No Clinton, or even Biden, bribery, trading money fr official favors.
^+1
Straw grasping by the TDS-addled slimy pile of lying shit Welch. Fuck off and die, shitstain.
Welch isn't conservative. Get over it. He wrote a truthful article. Unless an article praises Trump, you guys won't be happy.
The essence of conservatism.
Trump is pressuring the Fed to lower interest rates. Lower interest rates allow borrowers to borrow more with the same mortgage payment. It injects more money into the real estate which is heavily dependent upon borrowed money. That causes the price of real estate to rise. Trump has vast real estate holdings, the market value of which would surely increase if interest rates were lowered as Trump is pressuring the Fed to do. TDS? How about LOTAS? Don't succumb to LOTAS (Lips On Trump's Ass Syndrome), unless you love the shitstain.
Yes, identifying TDS-addled lying piles of shit. Fuck off and die, asswipe.
I don't have have to insult you to make my point. Don't you consider it just a little bit beneath your dignity to hurl insults like that? Insults are all you have because you know for a fact that I'm right.
Also, I'm not a Trump hater. I'd have voted for him if he stood a chance of winning my state. Since he didn't, I voted Libertarian, my true choice. But, that doesn't mean that I agree with all his policies or like him as a person. The reason I tolerate him is that he seems unlikely to be able to implement the dangerous policies of the ones he advocates - invading Mexico to go after cartels, inflating the money supply to prop up the economy. Dude, you're way too quick with the insults.
Here's the problem with this reasoning: the Fed controls the interest rates. If President Trump calls for lowering them, it can certainly be alleged that he's doing it for personal gain -- however, it can also be alleged that President Trump wants what's best for America, and that which benefits a lot of Americans can very well be a benefit for him, too, because he's an American himself.
I, for one, don't think the Fed, President Trump, or any other government bureaucrat should have the power to set interest rates one way or the other. That power should strictly reside in the hands of the lenders and borrowers.
This will remove all possible conflict of interest from anyone in government, and thus, it's the only moral choice -- and if you oppose it, it's clearly because you stand to benefit somehow by government control of interest rates (in which case, due to the conflict of interest, you should recuse yourself from any conversation, or vote, or any other attempt to persuade or force others on the matter).
Agreed. Get rid of the Fed, let the free-market rule.
Maybe. One could argue that he's crazy like a fox trying to avoid a market crash. As of this writing (4 Aug 25), the stock market indices are at or near all-time highs and may have topped out a bit. Looking at them, it looks like they're ready for a "correction" down to their bottom trendlines, short term and long term.
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/djia/charts
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/spx/charts
https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/index/comp/charts
I think Trump wants to avoid that by goosing the economy by lowering interest rates. The trick is how much. If rates are lowered too much, it further accelerates an inflationary boom that crashes down harder later unless rates are further cut, which would lead to further inflation
Now, if interest rates are cut just enough to stave off a crash but not enough to continue a boom, then both a crash and accelerated inflation could be avoided. But, that's very tricky. Maybe he's calling for a 3 percentage point cut (which would be excessive) knowing that the FOMC would resist but would likely cut by 1/4 to 1 percentage point. (The Art of the Deal.) 1/4 to 1 percentage point interest rate decrease might just be the rate that would keep the markets from falling while not being inflationary, leading to long-term sidewise market action neither inflationary nor recessionary, which would be good. I'm not sure if Trump is intentionally trying to do that.
If he's not taking government money I don't give a shit.
The USA is a country of laws - not whiny feelings. Please cite the laws that Trump broke with his "branding" effort.
You don’t have a problem with the genocidal Zionist ball slurper sending off nuclear armed attack submarines due to harsh internet posts insulting him? Hmm, interesting.
"You don’t have a problem with the genocidal Zionist ball slurper..."
I didn't know you had the poser to do that, asswipe.
Why would the senile fuck care what people see him doing? He thinks he’s King.
No, TDS-addled lying shits like you think he's king. Fuck off and die, asshole.
Sevo, shuffle off to your garage, climb up on your cow stool, wrap your belt around your neck, secure it to a rafter, and jump off you babbling genocidal Zionist fool.
Nazi asshole, fuck off and die.
Sevo, take a peek out from behind Trump’s ball sac for a moment. You, like Trump, have A LOT more in common with nazi perspectives than I do, you genocidal Zionist bastard.
You, like Trump, are treasonous enemies of the American people and deserve to be tried as such.
If a valid warrant for your arrest should be issued here in the States, I’d be happy to serve it at your next counseling session.
“Cavalier accusations of treason,” Matt? Here is the quotation you give from Hillary that you regard as such:
“Actions have consequences, and whether we’re in Syria or not, the people who want to harm us are there & at war. Isolationism is weakness. Empowering ISIS is dangerous. Playing into Russia & Iran’s hands is foolish. This President is putting our national security at grave risk.”
Okay, that’s stupid, and cheesy, and overwrought, and a lot of other things, as Hillary so often is, but our girl isn’t calling Trump a “traitor”—and Trump has called Hillary a “traitor” explicitly. You know something, Matt? You sound a little cheesy and overwrought yourself on this one.
If only he would stick to selling access like a normal president.
Keep saying mean insults like that to Trump and he’s going to jam your “fist of etiquette” up your keister of etiquette.