Wife of Marine Corps Veteran Released After 2 Months in ICE Detention
Paola Clouatre had no previous convictions and was detained immediately following a green card interview.

Paola Clouatre, the wife of Marine Corps veteran Adrian Clouatre, was released on Monday after two months in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention, with the help of Sen. John Kennedy (R–La.). Cloutare's arrest is symbolic of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown, which has mostly targeted people with no criminal record, despite his claim that he's deporting the "worst of the worst."
ICE initially detained Clouatre on May 27. After coming to the United States as a teenager with her mother to seek asylum over a decade ago, the 25-year-old began the green card application process shortly after marrying her husband last year. Clouatre was surprised to discover through the application process that ICE had issued a deportation order against her in 2018, stemming from her estranged mother's failure to appear at an immigration hearing in California.
During a recent green card appointment in New Orleans, Clouatre and her husband explained that she had requested that her case in California be reopened. In a video interview with the Associated Press, Adrian Clouatre said they were asked to wait in the lobby for paperwork after finishing the interview when ICE agents arrived with handcuffs and took Clouatre—a mother of two young children—into custody.
Like the other 65 percent of people taken by ICE this year to meet a quota of 3,000 arrests per day, Clouatre had no previous convictions. Yet, despite posing no threat to public safety—and having demonstrated her willingness to cooperate with the immigration court system—ICE chose to keep Clouatre in a detention facility in Monroe, Louisiana.
For two months, Adrian Clouatre made the eight-hour round trip each week from their home in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, to visit Clouatre in detention, bringing their 2-year-old son and 4-month-old breastfeeding baby. The two finally received confirmation that Clouatre would not be deported after an immigration judge in California stayed the order for her removal on July 23. But Clouatre was not immediately released from detention and was told by her lawyer that release could take weeks.
But Clouatre was home just five days later after Kennedy—a general supporter of Trump's immigration policies—reached out to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), requesting her release. Reunited with her family, Clouatre is currently wearing an ankle monitor. It will likely take years to close Clouatre's immigration court proceedings and—eventually—obtain her green card, her attorney told the A.P.
Adrian Clouatre told the A.P. that rather than throw people into detention just for being undocumented, he wished ICE would "actually look at the circumstances" before detaining people. But ICE has not taken such an approach, and has detained a record high 56,816 immigrants as of July 13. The agency's efforts to meet the Trump administration's mass deportation goals have led to overcrowding issues and legal challenges over due process violations, such as denying bond hearing requests for detainees who pose no public safety threat.
But the rush to arrest, detain, and deport undocumented immigrants in the U.S. without proper procedure—or concern for the harm violations cause immigrants and Americans alike—may be backfiring. A recent poll conducted by The Economist and YouGov from July 11 to July 14 found that the majority of Americans (52 percent) believe Trump's approach to immigration has been "too harsh," and only 36 percent believe his approach is "about right." Respondents to a CBS News poll also made procedural objections to Trump's immigration tactics, including the belief that the administration is making too many mistakes by moving too quickly, that immigrants should be able to challenge deportation orders in court, and a disapproval of detainees being treated harshly in detention centers.
Clouatre was fortunate enough to request and receive the help of an elected official to lessen the burden of detention on her and her family; most ICE detainees won't be so lucky.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
MAGA would probably want the marine vet deported for the crime of marrying an illegal immigrant.
Haha, clingers got a taste of their own poison... This commander in chief is running a truly brilliant PR strategy targeting all DoD employees, as well as his own (govt) workers in general.
republican Darwin award in GE or mid terms? What do you guys think?
You have no idea what's coming. It's going to be quite a shock
Yes we do. People hate criminals. What is coming is the end of the Democratic Party and open borders that lead to harming American citizens.
Probably time for you to run along, charliehall; that glass won't lick itself.
Yes he failed his duty.
Many criminals are “surprised” to discover charges against them.
Also, note the 25-year long asylum due process. She and her mother should have been deported decades ago.
Personally, it's all getting to be stupid emotive reaction to ink blots.
They weren't shot to death in their homes like the Tuttles. She wasn't a check forger and opioid addict that sparked a year of riots like George Floyd. Like the hundred people a year wrongfully arrested on the same weapons charges Hunter Biden got arrested on Reason doesn't generally give a shit about this case except to further their "A poll showed 52% opposition!" narrative.
The oxymoronic, remove-nose-to-spite-face use of the word 'fortunate' is telling. Her mother brought her here as minor. She married a citizen/veteran, had kids, and was applying for a green card. She was legitimately in a gray area/flux and her veteran husband's citizenship status and connections to the community/country rightfully saved her. Other illegal immigrants who aren't married to citizens/veterans and don't have connections to their community won't be so 'fortunate'? No shit you "Borders are just a social construct" retard. Nobody looted anything. Nobody got shot. Nobody set fire to an ICE detention center or a Church. If this is the dark night of fascism that has descended, it beats the shit out of 2020. Go manufacture news somewhere else.
Iirc, it takes between one and two years for a foreign national to get a green card after marrying a US citizen (and the marriage is recognized by the US govt). Often, the marriage occurs while the spouse remains in their home country until process is completed. Until you have that green card, especially when there is a deportation order issued against the person that has been here 25 years (illegally), the detention is not surprising.
She is still in the US, not in detention. For her individual situation, provided she gets approved for a green card, it seems reasonable.
A previous supervisor's girlfriend was a Canadian national on a student visa. They decided to get married a year before her visa expired. The whole thing was above aboard. Took them almost that long. The whole time, her family came here to be involved and they didn't book their honeymoon until about 6 weeks out from the wedding because they weren't sure they would be able to go anywhere.
It's well documented that they are harvesting people from green card and citizenship hearings.
Most of them won't have the good fortune to have a Senator intervene on their behalf.
Maybe they could focus on the people who aren't voluntarily submitting to court supervision?
Maybe they could focus on the people who aren't voluntarily submitting to court supervision?
So you're suggesting that there are still millions and millions of violent immigrants that continue to be overlooked?
Because all I see is a situation where everyone on either side acknowledges "It's complicated." and retarded assholes like you and Reason who, with no real justification or even a real, durable explanation, shout "It shouldn't be!" at one side.
A woman wanders across the border seeking asylum, abandons or is otherwise estranged from her presumed daughter, and gets her asylum denied for failure to appear is your preferred status quo/"That's the way the system is supposed to work!" scenario? Because that scenario sounds an awful lot like a hundred other cases where children are smuggled into a country by a coyote and otherwise exploited or abandoned and she was just 'fortunate'.
She broke our laws. She should be deported. Sorry.
Thank you for not reading the article, showing zero empathy or willingness to learn, and allowing your ignorance on full display. You're a true MAGA warrior!
If the law had been enforced 10 years ago, none of this would have happened. You are arguing empathy and emotion, which is not what laws are all about. He is showing that the current problems stem from not enforcing laws 10 years ago.
Below Average Intelligence Possibly White Dude, keep throwing shit against the wall. It is mildly amusing reading your seething rage. Thnx.
What empathy do you show for citizens killed by your preferred import the criminals and never deport criminals policies?
On some warrants they don't go after you. They just wait for a traffic stop. That interview was her traffic stop.
It does surprise people who are arrested at a traffic stop because they have an outstanding warrant they were not aware of. Being from hicktown I've seen that plenty of times.
This interview was the time to initiate proceedings to resolve the deportation order. And that occurred which is fine.
What's not ok is the failure to immediately release her.
What's not ok is the failure to immediately release her.
Release her with an SSN that has been asserted to exist? Release her as an illegal immigrant applying for a green card? Release her as a legal immigrant with out citizenship or an SSN applying for a green card? Release everyone who's estranged from their mother for around a decade and applying for a green card? Release everyone who applies for a green card without question? Release everyone married to a US Citizen? Release everyone married to a citizen who gave birth to their kids on US soil?
The situation is exceptional. It was treated exceptionally and got an exceptional resolution.
I'd say that if this really concerned you, you should write your Congressperson or Governor and make sure they're more snappy about turning around such situations, but you chose to virtue signal that you're a "Borders are just imaginary social constructs! We should abolish immigration!" retard first and that genie can't be put back in the bottle.
No what is not okay is releasing her. She failed for years and years to become legal. She needs to pay the price. Sorry.
My understanding is she's 25 years old and came here illegally with her mom at 15. She's here illegally and had a deportation order. It's not at all surprising that she was brought into custody. Just because she found an anchor by marrying a citizen doesn't mean she wasn't eligible for deportation and it is correct to go through the process of deciding whether to put a stay on her deportation.
She was surprised that the law is actually being enforced now. Which is understandably frustrating. The law should have been enforced the entire time.
But it wasn't and she married an American and now the government is fucking up the lives of 3 Americans and 1 almost American for shits and giggles a decade after their mistake.
Any anytime a criminal is arrested, it potentially fucks up the lives of those around them, even if they've skated on the charges for years before they got around to prosecuting.
When a murderer takes years to be caught, it fucks with the lives of Americans. Such is life.
Clouatre was surprised to discover through the application process that ICE had issued a deportation order against her in 2018, stemming from her estranged mother's failure to appear at an immigration hearing in California.
That's totally her fault and she should have known. Besides that, the fact that she broke immigration law means she has no respect for any laws. She's just as bad as murders and rapists. Worse, even. Because murderers and rapists know that murder and rape is wrong. But her, being illegal, don't believe those things are wrong. She's an inhuman monster. She needs to be executed to prevent her from committing further crimes.
/ if MAGAs said what they really believe
"if MAGAs said what they
really believesay in my handmaiden fantasies"Fixed
Someone else who either (a) prefers rule of men to rule of law, or (b) doesn't understand that rule of law comes down to rule of men interpreting law.
Whatever. Rule of Robocop is what people think rule of law should be, but they can't quite grasp the concept that it doesn't work that way, and if it did, they wouldn't like it.
Looking at the circumstances sounds suspiciously like due process, and we know you guys hate that shit.
I now think it may be better to choose woke and progressive over volatile and inhumane. The republicans are toast.
What happened to Laken Riley was inhumane.
You're actively making the point of looking at the circumstances case by case.
It seems that Laken Riley was murdered by an illegally present psycho. Paola Clouatre is a little bit of a different case.
Therefore, thank you for agreeing with the main point of this sub-thread.
And in this woman's case, she has an outstanding deportation order, issued via the due process Congress prescribed.
Why do you hate due process?
Thank you for responding to my comment with germane on-point words and baseless supposition backed up by nothing I said.
That's where he does his best work.
Not atypical for Strawcasmic.
There you go again with due process.
What about our right to feel safe?
Note that this is what their side considers "due process".
https://reason.com/2025/04/15/colorado-will-soon-require-a-discretionary-permit-to-acquire-semiautomatic-rifles/
S.B. 3 makes the freedom to acquire a broad class of commonly owned firearms contingent on a local law enforcement official's approval, which can be denied if that official deems the applicant dangerous.
I prefer a cop who'd allow me to dump my beer, instead of citing me when I was underage as the law prescribed. Who allows for a few extra miles over the speed limit then strict enforcement.
3 felonies a day (even if over estimated), says you may not actual like it if the law actually worked the way you say. The federal government has no idea how many federal criminal statutes are even on the books.
Thank you for agreeing that the rule of law is a myth.
I agree with the Marine.
These "The law is the law is the law" folks start singing a different tune when it's applied to them.
As you would for a DUI?
That’s not what he said.
He’s pointing out that Rule of Law is a myth. It’s kind of his thing.
We should just arrest everyone and hold them in Florida until they can show proof of their original birth certificate with testimony from witnesses who were present at their birth.
he wished ICE would "actually look at the circumstances"
If previous administrations had not intentionally let in tens of millions of illegals, we might enjoy the luxury of the time and resources to do that. But now, we are mounting an emergency response to an invasion and don't have time for much niceness.
Judge Dredd is closer to what we need.
Nobody does any research into the obvious crimes that must have been committed for her to have lived for years on her own in the US.
If she started the green card process shortly after marrying her husband last year as reported, how did the estranged daughter support herself prior to that? She must be guilty of either ID theft or failure to file taxes. W-2 wages cannot be reported for a person without a SSN. If she had an ITIN, she could potentially have been paid on a 1099, but that still deserves investigation.
Did she pay for the delivery of her first kid? Has she filed tax returns? So many questions reporters could ask, if they were not simply in it for the FEEELZ.
Given she was here originally as an asylee, she may well have had a SSN or otherwise been permitted to work. (And without knowing the specifics of the 2018 immigration decision against her mother, and by extension her, it's impossible to say what changed, and as an immigration court decision, it's probably not public. Given they're estranged, she never received notice of that hearing).
Given she was here originally as an asylee, she may well have had a SSN or otherwise been permitted to work.
This is between oxymoronic, dishonest, and presumptuous.
At 25, estranged from her presumed-asylee mother who was (to be) deported in 2018, it seems more likely that she/they were never granted asylum and she ran away from her mother if the person was even her mother to begin with.
In any event, the whole "I had no idea I was an illegal immigrant until I applied for my green card." conclusion you seem to be driving at seems between highly implausible and superficially contrived. SSDD, if she had an SSN and had been legally paying for school, retirement, property taxes, etc., Reason would've been sure to tell us.
Please explain to me how an illegal immigrant avoids paying property taxes and sales taxes.
If she were employed under a fake SSN, she's still paying payroll taxes, she just won't be able to collect. Which I'd think would amuse you.
Please explain to me how an illegal immigrant avoids paying property taxes and sales taxes.
I didn't say sales tax and, like Squirrelloid, you're stupidly confusing the sequence of events and the resulting conditional/casuality or is/ought chain in an utterly retarded "Procter hoch ergo prior hoc" fallacy.
To wit:
If she were employed under a fake SSN
Nobody said a/the SSN was fake. Specifically the opposite. If she'd been given one by her estranged mother as part of asylum, why would she assume she needs a green card? If she has an SSN and has been paying taxes and otherwise living as a citizen, why does Reason start the story with "It all started when she went to get a green card..." without mentioning the SSN?
Your narrative is retarded and you're trying to retard other people by pushing it.
why does Reason start the story with "It all started when she went to get a green card..." without mentioning the SSN?
Exactly. People who deal with these things on a regular basis see the red flags in the story and the utter lack of probing questions or research on the supposed victim.
Low wages workers do not pay net positive taxes dumdum.
Likewise it causes issues for the people whose identity they stole.
Yup but these people think violating all the laws are just fine.
>>Cloutare's arrest is symbolic of President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown
symbolic to you does not mean the iconic to everyone you wish it to mean.
ICE is doing this to keep us safe.
These inconveniences are the price of safety.
No, it's not to keep us "safe" from individual illegal aliens. It's to address an existential threat to our national sovereignty, our way of life, and our culture.
You’re really bad at this.
Rough math: 25 yrs old now. Came with mom over a decade ... so 15yrs old when she came. Mom apparently effed up in 2018 , so 18 yrs old then. So how many 15~18 year olds know whether their parents did the right thing with the government ? Also, it says 'estranged mother' , who is probably estranged for a reason.
And like a lot of folks, she got arrested while trying to do the right thing once she knew it was amiss. You guys are punishing the wrong people, but you don't care because it fits your race replacement boogieman theory.
She had no authorization to work in the US or ability to get on insurance. How did she support herself and how did she pay for her 1st child during the intervening 6 years?
You don't care because it doesn't further your narrative.
Asylee's have the right to work in the US. And that's how she was here in the first place, seeking asylum. Get your facts right.
Seeking asylum isn't being granted asylum and a deportation order definitively indicates that whether it wasn't granted or was granted and revoked, she didn't have asylum then, if she ever did.
Everyone here, except you and Reason it would seem, understands how receipts and evidence and chain-of-custody and causality works. At this point, the question isn't "Why was she detained." the question is, why are you denying facts as printed and inventing "facts", i.e. speculating, to refute the narrative that actually is given?
" How did she support herself and how did she pay for her 1st child during the intervening 6 years?"
Tell me you can't afford a housekeeper without telling me you can't afford a housekeeper.
Tell me you illegally (outside TX) employ a housekeeper without paying for workman's comp insurance without telling me you illegally (outside TX) employ a housekeeper without paying for workman's comp insurance.
Is she an illegal alien yes or no.
She arrived seeking asylum, which was granted. Something happened with her mother in 2018 which ended in a deportation order when her mother didn't appear, but because they were estranged, she never received notice of the hearing. So is she here illegally? Arguably no. She never received notice, had no reason to believe she wasn't still validly in-country as an asylee, and deserves at the very least a court hearing on her asylum status.
I expect she was getting a green card because she wanted to be a citizen, not to correct a deficiency in her legal presence, because she had no knowledge that there had been that court hearing in 2018 and that her asylum status was revoked. (And didn't find out till she started the greencard process).
She arrived seeking asylum, which was granted. Something happened with her mother in 2018 which ended in a deportation order when her mother didn't appear, but because they were estranged, she never received notice of the hearing. So is she here illegally? Arguably no. She never received notice, had no reason to believe she wasn't still validly in-country as an asylee, and deserves at the very least a court hearing on her asylum status.
This violates causality in a "I'm my own grandpa." fashion. "A person I haven't seen since I was a minor and who didn't show up for her own court date told me, without any proof, that I was a citizen/legal resident so I just presumed I was." doesn't stand to the least bit of scrutiny.
I was born here. Before I was 18 I had my birth certificate and knew my SSN because I paid taxes on my labor. When I turned 18, I filled out my Selective Services card and started voting. At 23, I turned down jury duty in my (home) parents' state because I didn't live there any more. The idea of "I didn't know I wasn't a citizen/legal immigrant until I tried to get a green card." doesn't make sense.
That's ridiculous. She knew she did not have permanent status to be here. That's why she was seeking a green card.
You didn't answer the question.
On the day she was taken into custody by ICE, was she an illegal alien yes or no.
https://tenor.com/view/the-rock-know-your-role-dwayne-johnson-shut-your-mouth-gif-16618281
At 15 she knew from the beginning that she was an illegal immigrant. When they came, Obama's DACA was in effect. By the time she was 18 Trump made it clear she wasn't shielded by executive discretion. She tried marrying into legal status and citizenship.
Clouatre was surprised to discover through the application process that ICE had issued a deportation order against her in 2018, stemming from her estranged mother's failure to appear at an immigration hearing in California.
So she had the due process people keep yapping about.
She never received notice of the hearing to show up, so she did not receive due process. (Note the 'estranged' adjective applied to mother - it was the mother who was notified and failed to appear. As she was estranged, she likely didn't know her mother even had a hearing).
Congress has plenary authority to admit or exclude aliens, so Congress had already decided what process was due to issue the deportation order.
She shouldn't have estranged herself.
She never received notice of the hearing to show up, so she did not receive due process.
LOL! You are just making shit up. Sit down and STFU.
“She never received notice of the hearing to show up….”
The 2018 immigration hearing would have been for the mother, the daughter would likely have been a minor at the time. The mother no shows and a deportation order is issued for the mother and child(ren).
How the hell do you know the mother didn’t receive the hearing notice? I’m gonna take a wild guess that those applying for asylum have a duty to keep USCIS informed of their contact information e.g. address, phone number, email address, etc.
despite his claim that he's deporting the "worst of the worst."
I believe the notion was that the focus would be on those people, but that all illegal aliens were on the slate to be deported.
There are good people on both sides.
Pay no attention to Maryland Man's gang tats.
ChatGPT wrote this article. You can see it all over the place.
which has mostly targeted people with no criminal record, despite his claim that he's deporting the "worst of the worst."
You people keep telling this lie. You act like he said that's ONLY the people he's deporting. It's not and it never was. Every single illegal was always going to be rounded up and tossed out.
He already got the lion's share of "the worst of the worst." And then you jackholes decided they needed more sympathy than anyone because you didn't like seeing "the worst of the worst" chained up in an El Salvadoran prison where they belong.
There's still plenty of "worst" ones out there to get, but there's not - and never has been - a reason to NOT round them all the rest of them as well.
Like the other 65 percent of people taken by ICE this year to meet a quota of 3,000 arrests per day
See, and what you people don't get is that's what everyone is upset about. Not because that number seems high, but because it's LOW. That it's only 3000 per day. We should really be aiming at 7886 per day, with that number increasing every day ICE fails to meet it.
"a record high 56,816 immigrants as of July 13" - it's laughable. At this point, we should have a MINIMUM of 1,375,000 detained - with most of them out or on the way out.
Clouatre had no previous convictions. Yet, despite posing no threat to public safety—and having demonstrated her willingness to cooperate with the immigration court system
Irrelevant, irrelevant, and irrelevant.
Adrian Clouatre told the A.P. that rather than throw people into detention just for being undocumented, he wished ICE would "actually look at the circumstances" before detaining people.
No. This isn't a game we're playing. We're past "the circumstances." Illegal alienage got completely out of control, and hair-splitting has no place anymore. So sorry his suegra screwed his esposa. Take it up with her.
Either you have immigration laws or you dont.
If there are laws and policies in place controlling immigration, and then you enforce them, what's the problem? You should be arguing for paperless wide-open border crossings if that's what you support.
It's quite obvious that that's what Reason supports.
You should be arguing for paperless wide-open border crossings if that's what you support.
The problem is even at that the story, strictly immigration-wise, was that this woman was brought here by someone and essentially abandoned before she was a citizen and/or adult.
For every ounce of speculation that she had a legit asylum claim and was issued an SSN there's an equal ounce of speculation that the woman who brought her here wasn't her mother or even a relative, she knows the law will never catch up with her if she's even still alive, and, really, this woman has known since she was a teenager that she was an illegal alien and hemmed and hawed indecisively until a year ago.
The Dutch practice of dropping your kids off in the woods to toughen them up and generate a sense of independence is one thing but taking kids to another country and essentially abandoning them is not exactly the ideal "shining city on the hill" example, much less the way you maintain one.
Headline: ICE ENFORCES LAW. LAWBREAKERS UNHAPPY!
She was in the country illegally for how long before applying for legal resident status?
Her anger should probably be directed toward her mother.