Trump's Tariffs and Japan Deal Could Encourage Toyota To Move Manufacturing Jobs Out of America
Trump believes he can deploy tariffs without tradeoffs or distortions. In reality, each new tariff move creates both.

Over the past few decades, Japan-based automaker Toyota has spent billions of dollars to expand its manufacturing and assembly plants in the United States. Those plants now employ over 64,000 people across North America and have churned out millions of vehicles.
For politicians who fetishize blue-collar work, this ought to be tremendous news. Indeed, it also illustrates one of the underappreciated aspects of globalization and free trade: The flow of capital and goods often gets blamed for the outsourcing of American jobs overseas, but it also means the creation of jobs in America that are backed by investments from foreign firms.
Now, however, the Trump administration seems to be trying to undo that. With a series of short-sighted tariff maneuvers, the president has effectively told Toyota (and other Japanese carmakers) that it should do more of its manufacturing in Japan and stop trying to create jobs in America.
Earlier this week, President Donald Trump announced a new trade deal with Japan that will include a 15 percent tariff on Japanese goods, including imported cars. The details of the deal remain somewhat vague, but that's a significant discount compared to the 25 percent tariff the administration has imposed on cars imported from everywhere else.
The reduced tariffs for Japanese cars are significant because of how that provision interacts with the Trump administration's other trade policies that are aimed at making it more expensive to manufacture cars in the United States. The president has imposed a 50 percent tariff on steel and aluminum (both of which are essential for automakers) and has slapped a 25 percent tariff on imported cars and car parts. Those tariffs are already dinging the profits of American carmakers—General Motors reportedly lost more than $1 billion in the second quarter of the year—and auto industry experts say they will raise prices, reduce demand for new cars, and generally make American cars less globally competitive.
In short, the Trump administration is offering an incentive to import finished cars from Japan, while making it more expensive to buy the stuff you need to build cars in America.
The 15 percent tariff on Japanese imports is "unfair for American automakers," who are facing a 25 percent tariff on auto parts and finished cars imported from Canada and Mexico, David Whiston, an analyst for market research firm Morningstar, told The Washington Post. Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, has also called it a "bad deal."
So far, the White House has shaken off those complaints. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC on Thursday that tariff complaints from the American auto industry were "just so silly" and repeated the Trump administration's claim that "there's no tariff if you build it in America."
That is simply untrue, as long as the Trump administration is charging tariffs on the raw materials and component parts needed to build cars in America.
Instead of trying to obfuscate about the consequences of tariffs, Lutnick ought to consider the message being sent to Toyota executives. They are being given a choice. Continue building the Camry and the Highlander in America, where every component is subject to 25 percent tariffs and where steel prices have spiked as a result of the tariffs (which have pushed prices higher even for domestically produced metals not subject to the import taxes).
Or you can build those same cars in Japan, then import them to the United States and take advantage of a favorable relative tariff rate. What would you do? What would that mean for the hundreds of thousands of Toyota employees in the United States?
Of course, it is not just Toyota that is dealing with the higher costs incurred by Trump's tariffs. International automakers have invested $124 billion in the U.S. and support more than 2.4 million American jobs, according to Autos Drive America, an industry group. As the Center for Strategic and International Studies warned in May, foreign car companies that had invested in production in the United States would be "devastated" by Trump's new tariffs on car parts. Now, at least Japanese automakers have been given an inadvertent escape hatch.
Ultimately, the problem here is not the specific tariff rates the Trump administration is seeking to charge on steel, car parts, or cars imported from Japan or Mexico. (Those rates are likely to change anyway, if the past few months of the trade war are any indication.)
No, the real problem here is the Trump administration's belief that it can use tariffs to shape the global trading system toward contradicting goals with no tradeoffs or distortions. In reality, each new tariff move causes both. The market responds to incentives, and right now, the Trump administration is creating a set of incentives that will raise costs for American manufacturers while driving investors overseas.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Your writing is terrible. Your knowledge of economics is even worse. Your ability to predict anything is, likely, worse.
Did you or KMW ever stop and wonder "Man, is this tripe even worth the ones and zeroes to host it on this site"?
Name-calling without ANY facts... Is the BEST that PervFected You can do?
I got plenty of facts below, shiteater.
Haven't you learned yet? Arguments in these comments aren't won with facts. No. Arguments are won by arguing against the person, not what the person says. By attacking the person, what they say can be invalidated, and that wins any argument. Just say that they're a poopy-head and that everything they say is poopy, and you win that argument and all future arguments. Start paying attention.
Looking dumber and dumber. Some needs to tell poor sarc to unmute me, just for a minute.
Arguments in these comments aren't won with facts.
An argument you make without providing a single fact. You are really really bad at logic.
But you did use "poopy" multiple times in a response to SQRLSY, which is meta.
Good point. Get sqrlsy hungry so he can fuck off for awhile.
Him arguing facts as he has never actually produced a single one is fucking hilarious. He denies the actual data.
Facts would be sobering contradiction to his arguments.
It's easy to build cars here, but shocks and struts? We can't build shocks and struts in America, far too complicated. Don't start me on really really complicated things like water pumps and air compressors. Heck, nuts and bolts are too complex for American industry, best we import them from foreign nations.
"International automakers have invested $124 billion in the U.S"
The US is not a safe place for foreign investment anymore.
Imagine quoting a fact then stating a conclusion that completely contradicts it.
You might be as dumb as charliehall.
On a scale of charliehall to ten, his post was about at the bottom with a charliehall. Big Akita did not respect it.
Hey now! Charlie holds PhD’s in both remedial math and retardation.
There’s no contradiction.
Check out the racist over here.
.
Here's a list of tech giants that have pledged over $1 trn in US investment.
They’re all going to change their mind immediately. Or they’re stupid. Trust Boehm and charliehall. They know better.
"Trump's Tariffs and Japan Deal Could Encourage Toyota To Move Manufacturing Jobs Out of America."
Doubtful.
It would cost Japan more to manufacture their cars in their country and then ship them here to American customers here in the States.
Plus, it would piss off a lot of Toyota workers, customers and other Americans if Japan should decide to move their manufacturing plants back.
I don't know where Boehm gets his ideas, but he should lay off the weed and/or booze when writing.
It would cost Japan more to manufacture their cars in their country and then ship them here to American customers here in the States.
Did you read the article? Apparently not. Thanks to Trump's tariffs, the cost of manufacturing cars in the US is going way up thanks to 50% tariffs on aluminum and steel, and a 25% tariff on imported car parts. Meanwhile cars imported from Japan would only be subject to a 15% tariff plus shipping which averages at around $3,000 per car, which is less than the import taxes they'd have to pay to make it here.
“Did you read the article? Apparently not.”
Poor sarc.
Imagine trying to use an Appeal to Boehm as an argument. Especially when the argument is all conjecture.
Sarc is an idiot. He thinks the average price of a car in the US is $20K?
"The average price of a new car in the United States is $48,799 as of May 2025, according to Kelley Blue Book data."
That would mean the tariff on that average car would be about $6000 from Japan or $10,000 from elsewhere.
Now let's talk about what percentage of the cost of a vehicle is for the steel. Hint - average price of AHSS is around $874/ metric ton. Average vehicle is around 4300 pounds, so 50% tariff on steel is going to run $900.
There are also lots of exceptions to tariffs.
They also have a lot of plants in the US and this deal even was advertised with US investments.
Yeah, we don't have any aluminum or steel here in America, we need to get that from foreign nations. And who the heck thinks we can build something as complicated as shocks, struts, water pumps here in America? We need foreign nations to build those thing for us. Building a car is easy, but nuts and bolts, way beyond our capabilities.
You are arguing with the misleading headline, lol.
Businesses thrive on unpredictability. Jesse told me so.
I think Jesse’s wrong.
I think you’re more like abortionists than climate change zealots on this topic.
His whole world view is an intro chapter he read in HS based on idealistic systems. He got an A on that test though so it makes him an expert or something. And his failed predictions dont count against him.
Ripples man. Ripples.
I do see that too. See below for my reasoning.
He’s like a freshman psychology major that believes they are suddenly a professional psychologist.
Fucking hack.
“Toyota’s $1.8B overhaul could future-proof US auto production”
https://www.cbtnews.com/toyotas-1-8b-overhaul-could-future-proof-us-auto-production/
Toyota Invests Additional $88 Million in its U.S. West Virginia Plant.
Boehm can't even use google to check his bullshit. Reason should just give Sarc a bottle of mad dog to write for them.
Boehm doesn’t care. He published hit piece and now he will receive his brown envelope full of Koch bucks and some head pats.
Dumbass.
“Where is the New Toyota Plant Being Built? Unveiling Toyota’s Latest Manufacturing Investment”
https://autocarshub.com/where-is-the-new-toyota-plant-being-built/
Look. Facts dont matter in economics. Only failed predictions and theory.
Retard.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/toyota-boosting-grand-highlander-production-161655863.html
In case I haven’t made myself clear, I don’t respect Boehm’s opinion.
Toyota Texas to Expand and Add More Than 400 New Jobs
https://pressroom.toyota.com/toyota-texas-to-expand-and-add-more-than-400-new-jobs/
After this mornings terrorist sympathasizing screed, he should be 86.
But sin taxes are great! Nothing like punishing your perseved enemies with progressive taxes; sex, drugs, and rock and roll have nothing on the rush that stealing money provides.
Give me another hit pusherman.
I think you’re more like abortionists than climate change zealots on this topic.
GOPI is wrong on this. You are closer to climate change Z's regarding this topic.
Other stuff is quite reasonable.
I stick to my mocking them as being climate alarmists. It's a cult to their failed models.
I say that because there’s abortionists here that are reasonable on most other topics. Climate change zealots tend to be leftists on most other topics.
He has dipped his toe into TDS with other topics. Tariff mania is a gateway drug.
Climate abortionist?
There is a huge crossover between the two.
Would a Venn diagram be helpful?
Now I'm hearing cackles in my head...
Boehmenomics - the use of the word might and maybe to push liberal narratives.
The deal includes domestic investment. For fucks sake.
Something doesn’t smell right about that. Japan gets 10% of perhaps 7% profits? Japan is willing to pony up for 0.7% return? There’s something else going on.
About the only thing that is certain right now is uncertainty. Trump could change his tariffs tomorrow, twice on Sunday, and then again on Monday. No businessman in his right mind is going to make long-term decisions based upon Trump's erratic behavior.
This looks extra dumb after the four links I posted above.
He doesn't even read his own links. Like when he posted an article that stated exactly what we've been telling him.
His shrivelled, pickeled little brain just knows it hates Trump and needs more booze.
Hey Jesse sock. You're on mute because I have no interest in anything you have to say. Fuck along please, and French kiss a light socket while you're at it.
You should keep making comments about nobody presenting any facts to refute Boehm.
Such dehumanizing language.
We all know you don’t mute anyone. You’re just a pussy.
TRUMP EFFECT: A Running List of New U.S. Investment in President Trump’s Second Term.
Sarc is wrong and the sun sets in the west.
Lucky for sarc he doesn’t read anything that contradicts his narrative, so he can post all this shit again next time.
I’ve resigned to the fact that Trump is a financial and economic moron. But Lutnick has to know better what a mess he is making.
You should stop listening to Boehm.
Lol. Parody. Or leftist. Which is the same as a parody.
Yet he was highly successful in his first term and on track to do even better this time.
If these tariffs have such a deleterious effect on the automakers why are the European companies investing more in America?
The Tariffs, on the other hand are not helping Americans as consumers. Prices are high enough on consumer goods.
Ron Paul is right, once again.
Prices haven't risen in PPI or any signal in CPI. Import prices were flat last month and the preceding one.
Stop relying on flawed models when actual data exists.
Let's say that you won't get any tariff relief despite actually making things in America, as Trump so often suggested. It's strange that Japan would agree to such a deal, but let's assume that's true.
In Boehm's view, it's in Japanese car industry's interest to move all production back to Japan to dodge the 50% tariff on steels. That goes against all Japanese business strategy of consolidating production as close to the main base as much as possible to save cost and boost efficiency. Now they have pay more for fuel and hire more people to move things around, not to mention dealing with Japanese tax rate and their own imposed tariffs. Where is cost of business and materials in general cheaper - Japan or some red southern state? Not to mention that's it way harder to fire workers in Japan.
Japanese car makers could alleviate some tariff concern by buying steel from Nippon Steel, which now has foothold in America. Or even some American steel company. Or maybe the foreign companies will offer products at a discount. Who buys steel more than companies that build automobiles, ships and planes?
Look at Japan - it's a tiny ass cramped country a step away or two from demographic catastrophe. America is huge AND hates public transportation. The greenies constantly dote on our "car culture" for a reason. They can't afford to lose America. Many Japanese young people are stuck in their own room or game room somewhere as years and decades go by. They're not going to abandon production in America. It's a pipe dream.
Boehm, did you stop to ask why Toyota has a factory in the US in the first place?
>"Toyota’s first manufacturing investment in the United States came in 1972 when the company struck a deal with Atlas Fabricators, to produce truck beds in Long Beach, in an effort to avoid the 25% "chicken tax" on imported light trucks introduced in 1964. "
"the hundreds of thousands of Toyota employees in the United States"
WAIT! Didn't you JUST GIVE that number as 64,000?
Eric is an idiot. By most metrics the tariffs have secured more favorable trade agreements and they have not had any of the adverse effects that the scaremongers predicted. Toyota is not moving jobs out of the country, the inverse is far more likely.