Columbia's $200 Million Deal Will Placate Trump—for Now
To reinstitute $400 million in federal funding, the university agreed to implement plans to combat antisemitism and to appoint an independent monitor to oversee changes.

Columbia University on Wednesday agreed to pay a $200 million fine over a three-year period in a settlement over the Trump administration's antisemitism allegations. After months of tension, the deal will restore the majority of the $400 million in federal research funding the president canceled earlier this year and keep future government funding intact.
In exchange for reinstituting the federal grants, Columbia has agreed "to follow laws banning the consideration of race in admissions and hiring, and follow through on other commitments to reduce antisemitism and unrest on campus," reported The New York Times. A jointly selected independent monitor will oversee the implementation of the university's plans to combat antisemitism. And federal investigations into alleged civil rights violations against Jewish employees will also be settled for an additional $21 million.
"The Trump Administration's deal with Columbia University is a seismic shift in our nation's fight to hold institutions that accept American taxpayer dollars accountable for antisemitic discrimination and harassment," Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement. The reforms, McMahon believes, will serve as a "roadmap for elite universities" and "will ripple across the higher education sector," insinuating that other negotiations—like the high-profile feud between the Trump administration and Harvard University—could reach a similar conclusion.
"The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define [Columbia]," said Acting University President Claire Shipman in a press release, "and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track. Importantly, [the agreement] safeguards our independence, a critical condition for academic excellence and scholarly exploration, work that is vital to the public interest."
Columbia is the first university to reach a deal with the Trump administration following President Donald Trump's January executive order to combat antisemitism. In March, Trump canceled $400 million in federal funding to the university after demanding changes to protest policies, security practices, and the Middle East studies department. Columbia initially agreed to the requirements, but negotiations continued after Trump pressured the university to accept a consent decree that would have appointed a federal judge to oversee policy changes.
Leading up to the final settlement, the Trump administration increased pressure on Columbia to accept a deal by threatening the school's accreditation—for which the university is currently being reevaluated—after a three-month-long investigation found that Columbia "acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students" and, therefore, was in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The Trump administration might be placated by the university's agreement for now, but any deal with the president comes with inherent risk. In contrast to Harvard—which chose to sue over $2.6 billion in frozen federal funding—Columbia chose to negotiate to protect an additional $1.3 billion in annual federal research grants. And while the university's statement reiterates that the settlement does not compromise independence or academic freedom, future and ongoing government entanglement seems likely, given that the university agreed to regular check-ins to evaluate continued compliance with "federal laws and regulations pertaining to admissions, hiring, and international students."
Although Columbia and Harvard have taken disparate approaches to the Trump administration's assault, both universities would be wise to disown the notion that partnership with and funding from the federal government is essential. To truly protect academic autonomy and freedom of thought, Columbia should avoid federal grants and find other means to fund its important work.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
End all federal funding of these institutions. Today.
Why do you hate funding antisemitism?
How would Trump get to dictate what they do without having the funding as a cudgel? The point of all this is control, not money.
Controlling the stolen tax dollars.
If it was about money then he'd just pull the funds. Instead he's using the funds as a way to control school policy.
Both entities get to control the stolen tax dollars. Win - Win - Lose.
You take the federal money, you get federal conditions.
Just ask any company that takes federal money.
Stolen tax dollars are sarcs favorite if they go to illegals or usaid.
He even wants them to steal more under the guise of the deficit.
But he didnt get permission from Congress to stop the funding!
Replace Trump with government and Sarc is giving a good example of why federal funding should stop. Get the politics out.
You must have missed the part about Title VI violations. So you support bigotry and racial discrimination, like most other Donkeys?
^ this. 100% this. Why am I on the hook for giving 400 million to columbia university in the first place?
Racist!
Because you enjoy the things that it brings : MRIs, the internet, GPS, etc. This is how you get that stuff. Only a few heavy hitters actually research anymore as it isn't immediately profitable and you know, capitalism. You want new stuff ? The government (taxpayer money) is the only place consistently still paying for it. Without it, you might get the same or equivalent maybe a lot later ... maybe decades, maybe not at all. Or more likely, it will be written in Chinese. American dominance is built on technological advancements and being technologically 'first' to the game (by hook or by crook). We aren't going to like a world where we are second or third in line; like Russia having stealth bombers and we don't, or a Russian SR-71 spy-plane giving us the finger and we can't do anything about it, or Japan having the bomb before we did, etc.
MRIs assault chain necklace wearing people of color.
We must close the missile gap!
boomer socialism thinking
The funding is for research the federal government wants.
And they can choose who to fund for it. It doesn’t need to go to Harvard, nor do the Feds need to send it anywhere openly antisemitic.
You OK with funding racist organizations? Funny, Donkeys used to support Title VI of the Civil Righys Act, or at least pretended to.
How about placating the Law, and basic fairness and decency?
What is so hard to understand about this?
Another shakedown by Donald Corleone
It's like Latisha James taught him well.
Always funny watching you Leftist shitstains defend racism and antisemitism. There is nothing about you that is not horrid to decent human beings.
I cannot understand why an Ivy League university that receives hundreds of millions of dollars needs the taxpayers money.
Can someone out there explain that to me?
It is for research the federal government wants.
Looks like Trump is okay with discrimination against racial minorities and Jews in admissions because there is nothing here about eliminating legacy preferences. He wants affirmative action for rich White folks like himself.
Are you retarded or something?
Yes, he very much is.