Trump's 'Deal' With Japan Is Another Loser for Americans
Not only does it raise taxes on American consumers, but it leaves American automakers at a distinct disadvantage relative to their Japanese competitors.

The Trump administration is touting a "massive" trade deal with Japan that was struck just days before the (still uncertain) August 1 deadline when higher tariffs are set to hit.
But, as with earlier "deals" struck with the United Kingdom and Vietnam, this agreement looks like a bad one for the United States. Not only does it raise taxes on American consumers, but it leaves American automakers at a distinct disadvantage relative to their Japanese competitors.
Under the terms outlined by Trump in a Truth Social post on Tuesday, imports from Japan will be subject to a 15 percent tariff when they enter the United States. Yes, that's lower than the 25 percent tariff that the president has been threatening to impose on Japanese imports, but it is still a huge tax increase relative to existing tariffs on Japanese goods.
Previously, the average tariff rate on American imports of Japanese goods was less than 2 percent, according to the World Bank's data. In other words, Trump's "deal" amounts to roughly a 650 percent tax increase on those imports. Those taxes, like all tariffs, will be paid by Americans.
The higher tariffs on imports from Japan will hit a wide variety of products, because Japan is one of America's biggest trading partners. Americans imported over $148 billion of goods from Japan last year, including billions of dollars worth of cars, machinery, industrial equipment, electronics, and pharmaceuticals. Trump's new deal will make all of those items more expensive.
Because cars are America's biggest import from Japan, that part of the deal is worth a bit more scrutiny. Indeed, when this deal is combined with some of Trump's other trade policy maneuvers, it looks like the White House might have delivered a huge victory for Japanese automakers—despite the Trump administration's professed interest in using tariffs to promote American manufacturing jobs.
Keep in mind that the Trump administration has already slapped 50 percent tariffs on steel and aluminum, both of which are essential to manufacturing cars. On top of that, American automakers are facing a 25 percent tariff on imported car parts. Those tariff hikes on raw materials and intermediate goods are driving up costs for American automakers like General Motors, which earlier this week blamed tariffs for a $1.1 billion drop in profits during the second quarter.
Now, the Trump administration is touting a deal that will apply a 15 percent tariff on cars imported from Japan (technically, it's a new 12.5 percent car-specific tariff on top of a 2.5 percent existing tariff on Japanese cars). In other words, it will be cheaper to import finished cars from Japan than it will be to import the steel, aluminum, and other parts necessary to build cars in the United States.
The American auto industry has already noticed. "Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no U.S. content than the tarrif imposed on North American built vehicles with high U.S. content is a bad deal for U.S. industry and U.S. auto workers," Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council, told Car and Driver.
In all, Trump's deal with Japan means that American consumers of Japanese products are facing a huge tax hike, while American manufacturers are now at a distinct disadvantage when compared to companies making finished products in Japan.
It's also worth noting that the deal itself remains quite vague, at best. For example, Trump claimed that Japan has promised to invest $550 billion in America over the next few years, but the Japanese government can't simply order private businesses to do that. Additionally, Trump's announcement seems to lack many of the details typically included in trade deals. The White House has not yet released the text of the deal, and Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told reporters that he was still reviewing the agreement, according to The New York Times.
Despite all that, Trump is declaring victory. "It's a great deal for everybody," the president said on Tuesday night. In reality, this latest development in Trump's trade war once again demonstrates how his tariffs are distorting markets, harming Americans, and undermining his administration's economic goals.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!!!
2025: So what if tariffs raise prices? They're patriotic!
You and Eric should meet up at a half million dollar lake house so you can both shed some tears.
And clean guns.
It might be frot with bodily fluids.
Count me in!!
Wasn't it you that stated taxes don't create inflation?
Are you stupid now but not then or are you stupid then and not now?
I said that tariffs don't effect the rate of inflation. But they do raise prices, which is inflationary. Not that you understand what rate means. That would require an education which you proudly do not have.
The education of making non-sequiturs?
Of which you just explained you did in detail?
Math.
You engaged in no mathematics.
>Those taxes, like all tariffs, will be paid by Americans.
The problem, Boehm, is that so far Americans aren't paying those taxes.
Also, there are three parties that tax incidence can fall on.
Producers - in the form of lower profits.
Employees - in the form of lower compensation.
Consumers - in the form of higher prices.
You understand this when it comes to corporation tax but somehow you think it's different with tariffs?
Who pays how much of that tax will depend on their relative power. So far anyway, consumers *have not* been paying higher prices. Producers have been swallowing smaller profits.
You understand that when Democrats tax American businesses, that that's a cost that gets passed along to customers, right?
Do you understand that tariffs are a tax on American businesses that import stuff? That's right. They're not a tax on producers. They're a tax on importers, which are American businesses that are run by, you know, Americans. So no matter how you slice it, Americans are paying those taxes.
And what makes you think Trump's taxes don't get passed along to consumers like Democrat taxes do? You making the Democrat argument that businesses should just eat the taxes and pay them out of their unlimited profits? That's what Democrats say.
Or are Trump's taxes magic?
You and Nelson have zero reading comprehension or economic understanding lol. Right along with Eric.
No matter how much data you are given, how many of your predictions fail, you continue being retarded.
What I understand is you are anti-Americans (the people) when it comes to immigration, exports, voting, religion, manufacturing, etc.
Now, all of the sudden, you are pro-Americans when it comes to tariffs. I figured you'd be cheerleading *anything* that made the lives of your fellow countrymen more difficult of expensive as long as another country benefited. What changed?
What you understand is wrong because the views you believe I have are those of a stupid caricature, not anything that I actually believe.
For example no one really wants to see rapists and murderers roaming the streets. Yet you honestly believe that because I support allowing people who want to work to come here and work, that what I really want is more criminals. You honestly believe that because I oppose the government setting up barriers to imports, that I don't want there to be an exports. You honestly believe that because i don't believe Trump's lies about the election being stolen, that I support stealing elections. And so on and so forth. You're just another hateful Trump supporter who argues in bad faith, who arrived at your beliefs through emotion, and therefore cannot be reasoned out of them. After all, if you feel something to be true, then you can't think yourself out of it.
If anyone was ever the physical embodiment of a stupid caricature it's you, Sarckles.
"What you understand is wrong" ...because Sarcs Tariff complaint is exactly Anti-American because he doesn't care about Trumps Tax-Cuts all he cares about is Make Foreign Great Again with Tax-Exemptions. Probably wants to keep the Subsidized shipping too.
"That's right."
"American businesses that import stuff" ... Are finally starting to pay for all that Democrat Spending JUST LIKE DOMESTIC has always been doing.
You don't have a stool to stand on until Domestic Taxes are more than import taxes and with Domestic being as high as 75% you're not even close.
So the extra cost can fall on American investors (if it only hits producers), American workers (if it only hits employees), or American consumers (if it only hits consumers)? And we’re supposed to think that these are all good things?
See, I believe that making deals that screw Americans for no rational reason is a bad thing. I’m funny like that.
It is amazing watching idiots like yourself and sarc see clear statements and still fail to comprehend it.
Import costs and rates measurements were flat last month. PPI is flat. What we are seeing is foreign producers reducing costs. The prices aren't being pushed to consumers. Yet you fucking idiots fail to recognize or understand this even when data is clearly presented to you.
What you believe is retarded leftist narratives and disregarding reality.
Import costs and rates measurements were flat last month.
Which means foreign suppliers are not reducing their price to absorb some of the tariff costs. And since we collected a record amount of tariffs last month without reducing import fees we know Americans are paying the tax.
The prices aren't being pushed to consumers.
And yet, consistent with what I said above, the CPI rose last month. And the heaviest tariffs haven't even hit yet.
PPI is flat.
PPI was down on services which are un-tariffed, but UP on goods which are subject to tariffs. There was a nice discussion on this on Just Asking Questions https://reason.com/podcast/2025/07/18/scott-lincicome-how-much-will-you-pay-to-buy-american/
If I cared I would copy and paste Jesse's arguments into google and see what comes up. Because he's not very smart. Which means he's repeating arguments made by someone else. I'm sure some of it is verbatim. That's also why he responds to rebuttals with name calling. Because he doesn't understand the arguments he's putting forth enough to respond with actual thoughts. So instead, like a monkey, he shits in his own hands and throws it before licking his fingers.
repeating arguments made by someone else.
Remember when you repeated Hamas' bullshit casualty numbers because they were at the top of the google results?
Facts change
I love how a majority of your comments are responses to people who agree with you but you complain about the person they are responding to. I rarely see a response where you actually address what is said. You are no better than the actions you claim to despise. And for the record, stats and numbers have been proving you wrong and you won't admit it.
Sarc is a lying, lowlife, drunken piece of shit. Treat him accordingly.
And yet prices are not going up - so, no, American consumers are not paying the tariffs.
Maybe the foreign employees are being paid less then?
It's not hard - there are only three people involved.
If the consumer is not paying higher prices then either the owner or the employee are eating the costs.
And yet prices are not going up - so, no, American consumers are not paying the tariffs.
But they are going up. They didn't not skyrocket, but they did tick up somewhat as seen in the CPI.
Maybe the foreign employees are being paid less then?
That would be reflected in the import price index by showing a decrease, but it remained flat and actually increased if you remove energy prices.
If the consumer is not paying higher prices then either the owner or the employee are eating the costs.
Yes, American owners, employees and retailers are paying some of the cost as evidenced by GM's profits going down by $1 billion.
Ticked up? So did inflation. Ticked up.
You are assuming that American owners and employees are working at and owning Japanese companies?
You are also missing the point that - so far - the owners are taking the hit on the form of lower profits.
You are assuming that American owners and employees are working at and owning Japanese companies?
What do with Japanese companies have to do with tariffs? They don't pay the tariff. The American importer does. Do you even know what a tariff is? It's a fat check that has to be written to the federal government. Say you import $100,000 worth of widgets from Japan and they arrive at port, and there's a 25% tariff on those goods. Before you can pick them up you've got to write a check for $25,000 to the federal government. The tariff is not paid by the producer. The producer is not involved, nor are the producer's employees. The only people involved are the American importer and the federal government. What does the importer do to recover that $25,000? Sure they can take it out of their profits, but 25%? That's bigger than most companies' profit margin. So the cost gets passed to the consumer.
And here's the part that really puzzles me. The entire point of a protective tariff is to raise prices! Yet you guys deny that basic fact. How can Americans be nudged into buying domestic if tariffs don't raise the prices of imports? Riddle me that one.
This is where your ignorance shows. The importer can (and will) push the tariff costs to the Japanese manufacturer. Or split the cost. Or pass it to the American consumer. Or a combination of all three. Or look for a cheaper manufacturing country. Or look for an American manufacturer for the widget and deal domestically.
Quit being such a tool who's never negotiated outside of a yardsale.
Here's what you don't seem to understand. The entire purpose of a protective tariff is to raise the price of what is being taxed! That's the fucking point! How can a tariff be protective and nudge people into buying American if it has no effect on the price of the imported goods? It can't.
So what you're doing is defending a policy that is meant to raise prices by claiming that it will not raise prices.
That's as dumb as when progressives say that hiking minimum wage won't cause unemployment. The people who created the minimum wage did so because they knew that putting a price floor on wages would create unemployment for blacks, retards, and other people who lacked the skills or ability to demand a wage equal to that floor. And it worked. People starved to death thanks to the minimum wage. Now it's sold as a way to give poor people a raise. The economics has not changed. Just the intentions. And it still does what economics says it will do.
You guys who are defending tariffs by claiming they don't raise prices are on the same level as progressives who say minimum wage helps the poor.
“ This is where your ignorance shows. The importer can (and will) push the tariff costs to the Japanese”
Absolutely not. No producer will take a hit to their profits because an American company is the one importing. Additionally, production costs are contractual agreements between the two parties, so they don’t have to eat the tariff. Why would they do so? Because they don’t want the poor American company to have to pay it, so they do it out of the goodness of their heart?
This is a Jesse level of stupidity and ignorance about how international supply chains work.
“ Quit being such a tool who's never negotiated outside of a yardsale.”
This was literally my job for years. Your astounding level of ignorance about how these things actually work is blatantly obvious.
This is a Jesse level of stupidity
That's pretty harsh.
You ever notice that Boehm has never once discussed the greatly increased export opportunities for American businesses? And what those opportunities mean for American workers and pour economy?
My guess is that the never will.
The Trump Administration doesn’t understand how the details of a trade deal screw both American consumers and American businesses? Gee, what a shock.
Nelson, Eric, and sarc fail to understand reality? What a shock.
But Nelson thinks he is the smart one!
Nelson has a brain that actually works, which is FAR more than I can say of the Trump Toadies around here!
What a projection from the man who consistently posts comments with purposeful nonsense
Yes, benevolence and data-driven, logical analysis is "purposeful nonsense" to the servants, serpents, and slurp-pants of The PervFected and Infected secretions of Dear Orange Leader, into His PervFected Pants! Keep right on slurping at His Pervfected Pants, Slurp-Pants! Above all else, ye NEED scapegoats, don't Ye? And Dear Orange Leader gives ye ALL of the scapegoats ("ferriners") that ye will EVER need!
You have yet to ever make an accurate or logical post about international trade. You parrot talking points from tariff supporters like Peter Navarro or MAGA fantasy factories. You have never, not once, made a substantive post to counter the points I have repeatedly made. You keep claiming that “my predictions” haven’t come true, yet so far I have been exactly right. The impact of tariffs didn’t appear for 3-4 months, they have started out slowly (witness the rise in CPI for products while there was a drop in CPI for services), and the projections based on market data indicate they will rise over the next several months. All of those things re what I have said, in detailed posts. None of my predictions have been wrong so far, although that can always change.
But you’re the one who thinks that the unabashed capitalists is a Marxist and the balanced budget advocate supports Democratic deficit spending. So you’re clearly clueless.
The reality, which you refuse to accept, is that a tariff raises costs on businesses. There is no rational way to claim otherwise.
When businesses incur increased costs, they find a way to offset those costs. There is no rational way to claim otherwise, especially for publicly traded companies whose stocks will take a hit if profits drop.
There are two main ways that companies offset increases in input costs: salary freezes and price increases. So perhaps they are splitting the hit between increased prices and wage stagnation, but that just means that part of the pain is taken on by American consumers and part of the pain is taken on by American workers.
And there is absolutely no rational reason for any of this pain to be inflicted on Americans in the first place. There is no gain from tariffs, except for government revenue. Trade deficits aren’t a problem, despite what Trump thinks. This is a completely self-inflicted wound, caused by ignorance in the Executive.
The only one ignoring reality is you and your tariff-fanboy friends.
This has been explained to yiu multiple times, and it’s getting old.
Stop lying.
Nelson doesn't understand how the details of DOMESTIC taxes screw both American consumers and American businesses? Gee, what a shock.
Nelson doesn't understand
how the details of DOMESTIC taxes screw both American consumers and American businesses?anything.Sure, the guy who makes detailed posts about how international supply chain works doesn’t understand anything, but the GOV-GUNS guy and some rando who posts one-line snark are the international trade wizards? Please.
Bullshit. You’ve been corrected many, MANY times. But like Pedo Jeffy, you memory hole everything and make the same arguments.
Us straightening you out is a show of generosity. Feel free to thank us.
More taxes, more managed trade...what's not to love.
Apparently managed trade is only concerning if it's 'imports'.
Otherwise Trump UN-managed trade domestically (Cut DOMESTIC Taxes).
I hate internal managed trade, too.
But this is an article about Japan and America and how unlike some claims that Trump's goal was freer trade, has resulted in higher taxes, more managed trade. And I'm against higher taxes, more managed trade.
Otherwise Trump UN-managed trade domestically
He signed the Cares Act(s). Pissed away trillions on shutting down the economy. I'll pass on Trump overall. The few things he's done well don't come close to the evil that is the Care Act(s). Overall the only thing good about him is he isn't Biden/Harris.
So you admit you're letting perfect be the enemy of better of which Trump is.
Nope. Elections over, man, Trump won. Biden/Harris aren't here anymore. I judge him on his policies alone. And the guy who signed 5 covid bills, sucks, in my opinion.
There hasn't been a good deal yet. What is becoming clearer though is the goal which was very confusing early on. The goal seems simply to create some level of tariff revenue and call that a victory
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/trump-announces-trade-deals-with-the-philippines-and-indonesia/ar-AA1J5ldq?ocid=BingNewsSerp
The details now seem to REPEATEDLY be (in multiple nations) that Americans get MUCH higher tariff-taxes than other nations do... Sometime TOTALLY lop-sided. USA product to foreign lands? Zero taxes! Their products here? WE get taxed!
HIGHER TAXES FOR AMERICUNTS ARE A 'VICTORY' TO TRUMP!!!!
Never thought I'd see the say when conservatives went on the march chanting "What do we want? Tax-es! When do we want them? Now!" But here we are.
Still waiting for that "now" months later. hahahahaha
Is that why Trump passed Tax-Cuts?? /s
You still don't understand that tariffs are a tax that American importers have to pay to the federal government before they can take possession of stuff that they bought from across the border.
Let's imagine an American company owned by Americans that employs Americans and sells stuff to Americans. The stuff it sells is from somewhere else. Let's imagine that a 25% tariff is put on the imports from the country that produces the stuff it sells.
Now let's imagine this company spends $100,000 to buy widgets from the country that produces what they sell. In order to take possession of those widgets, the company must first pay a $25,000 domestic tax to the federal government.
A domestic company with domestic employees and domestic customers must pay the domestic government a $25,000 domestic tax for the privilege of selling $100,000 worth of widgets on domestic soil.
That $100,000 worth of stuff now costs the company $125,000. $100,000 for the goods, and $25,000 in taxes.
Now the domestic has to sell this stuff to domestic people for a domestic profit. Don't you think domestic prices are going to go up to pay the domestic tax?
EVERYONE F'En knows Tariffs are a Tax on the Import of Foreign Goods. Precisely why Zero-Tariffs is a Tax-Exemption just for Foreign Goods. Which is Government favoritism for Foreign Goods/Market.
As hit on the head above, "you memory hole everything and make the same arguments. " as well as make-up imaginary straw-men (a belief that nobody actually believes) to attack.
It will reduce trade deficits too. Which works out to be a good thing - but in an inefficient way (by MASA - make America smaller again)
MASA? Let's get small? Small GNP, etc.?
How about Old “New Thang” MAGA make way for the NEW New Thang!!! MAGA meet MANGABA, Making Almighty NEW Government Almighty Bigger Again!!! All Hail MANGABA!!!
(Shit will also stimulate the economy by giving regulators, judges, and lawyers LOTS of NEW shit to fight about!!!)
MANGEE… Making Almighty NEW Government Expensive and Expansive!!!
Smaller? We’ve got commitments for upwards of $3 trillion in investment from various countries, and counting.
It's like there is a blind-sight in the lefty-brain that can't acknowledge 'production'. It can only see 'consumerism'. No wonder they try to create/think a Demand-Side only economy can work. They just can't see anything Supply-Side.
Trump is an idiot. This "deal" leaves the US worse than before Trump trashed the previous Japan Trade Agreement.
Yeah, he’s really stupid. I see all those buildings with “Molly” on top plus the fact you managed to get elected president twice as evidence you know what you are talking about.
That sounds like you think 'Post Office' should be elected Prez
That was a stupid comeback, even for you.
This "deal" is an opportunity for importers to kiss Trump's ass in order to get exemptions from these taxes. And that's exactly what will happen. Politically connected businesses will get a break and everyone else will get screwed.
You're batting zero, but this time your anti-Trump invective will finally be correct, right Sarckles?
LMAO... While you're insisting Foreign Markets get these exemptions.
When all else fails ... there's always Self-Projection. /s
"Trump is an idiot. This "deal" leaves the US worse than before Trump trashed the previous Japan Trade Agreement."
No it doesn't. Boehm is purposefully not telling the whole story here. He's leaving out parts of the deal that ameliorate the perceived negatives, which is essentially lying about the deal.
Really, genius? Which parts are those? Can you post what they are, or is this just a redstate.com hot take?
It’s more important to Reason that America lose than for Trump to succeed.
Just like USMCA vs. NAFTA. Trump is incapable of making deals that help the US. Watch for side deals that let Trump build hotels and golf courses in Japan. The Trump Cult is okay with such corruption.
Hey! Lets make-up stories about imaginative 'side-deals' to hate Trump for! /s
Because [WE] identify-as the TDS-cult just loves to self-project.
Tony, you don’t understand any of this. We all know you’re just a valid, raving faggot that parrots whatever Rachel Maddow tell you to.
Face it, you’re stupid.
This really isn’t an informed article.
Let’s agree that the details are a bit hazy at the moment. But if this deal opens up the Japanese market to America like Trump says it does, it is a HUGE win. Reason, who would say just one state spending 40 billion on illegal aliens is worth it because 1% of them work in farms and contribute to SS should have no problem understanding why the trade off is more on out side in this deal.
Japan is a hugely protectionist market. They do more than tariffs to protect their products from gaijin competition. It’s one of the reasons why their economy is so stagnant. If we can meaningfully expand there, especially agriculture and tech, the money will roll in.
Trump has operational control of Nippon steel. American automakers can try to offset tariff burden by doing business with them, or bring back manufacturing to America to dodge tariffs. Jobs in America - oh no, anything but THAT.
If we import more foreign cars, who cares? They’ll create jobs here, right? That’s how we defended free trade and outsourcing all these years?
"This really isn’t an informed article."
On purpose.
But if this deal opens up the Japanese market to America like Trump says it does, it is a HUGE win.
Whatever Trump says is bullshit. This doesn't open up the Japanese market. It merely reduces trade from Japan to the US by some amount. There is zero chance of exporting left-hand drive US SUV's and monster trucks to right-hand drive Japan with tiny crowded streets. Same as no chance of exporting US cars to Britain.
As for rice, the US produces mostly long-grain rice and almost zero short-grain - and is not competitive with Southeast Asia. Japan consumes almost entirely short-grain rice and ain't gonna switch its cuisine simply to import Uncle Ben's Instant at a high price.
It's not a surprise that whoever negotiated this deal has no clue what the US and Japan actually consume/produce or import/export. It was simply - let's make a deal and call it done.
As for Japanese auto manufactured in the US - the Japanese already do that and have done it for decades and generally have higher domestic content than the US car makers. The only Japanese manufacturers who might move production to the US are Mazda and Mitsubishi - but Mazda already announced that a while ago and Mitsubishi is tiny.
"This doesn't open up the Japanese market."
Links?
Rice sale are down in Asia due to carb concerns, some young Koreans will avoid it like the plague. So no, American rice probably won't make a big splash in Japan. But given that Japan has experienced recent rice shortage American exports could emerge as a solution.
Any Japanese auto makers who make cars in American would be exempt from some tariffs. And Nippon Steel is a major player in the American market now. You think the Japanese agreed to a 12% increase in tariffs without exploring all options? Come on.
Japan, Korea, China - the big three in Asia are all getting old fast with no babies being born. They're going to need resources and opportunities from outside sooner or later. Japan, unlike libtards, can actually read the room. "American first" isn't just some MAGA deal, it's found fans in the left sphere like younger male voters and union. Trump won blue state no republican has won since the 50s or something.
Japan got/gave nothing serious from this deal. US importers get to pay 15% to the US govt in order to import. Whether they have to eat that or pass that on to consumers is unknown. But this is in aggregate a huge nothingburger - with a news announcement that gets positive DOMESTIC publicity for Trump.
Even your comment indicates that the impact is somehow electoral - not economic. Does this raise or lower the chances of Trump getting domestic MAGA approval? Who the fuck cares? This is not how big economies work and it shouldn't be how 'libertarians' or free market advocates judge the US economy.
"Trump has operational control of Nippon steel."
Socialism for the win!!!!
Read the actual agreement!
He can't let details get in the way of his TDS. TDS is the whole point of his existence as it is with most of the Left. They're [WE] Identify-as gangster oriented. [OUR] [WE] mob RULES! is the bottom line.
“ But if this deal opens up the Japanese market to America like Trump says it does, it is a HUGE win”
The Japanese market is already open to America. They are literally one of our major trade partners. Why would anyone with a brain think Japan wasn’t open to American businesses?
“ Japan is a hugely protectionist market. They do more than tariffs to protect their products from gaijin competition. It’s one of the reasons why their economy is so stagnant”
And your position is “Stagnant economy? Yeah, give us some of that sweet, sweet protectionism!”? If protectionism (like tariffs) causes stagnation in an economy, as you claim, why would we want it? And why would you think it was a good thing?
“ If we can meaningfully expand there, especially agriculture and tech, the money will roll in.”
What makes you think this will in any way make such a sudden change happen? Hopes and dreams aren’t sound policy.
“ Trump has operational control of Nippon steel.”
What are you talking about? He has no operational control of any business except his own.
“ bring back manufacturing to America to dodge tariffs”
Can you MAGA folks stick to one, consistent premise for tariffs? Manufacturing isn’t going to come back to America due to a 15% tariff. It’s too low.
“ If we import more foreign cars, who cares? They’ll create jobs here, right?”
No. That was the point of the article. With the tariffs Trump has put on steel and aluminum, even with the 15% tariff it is probably cheaper to import cars made 100% outside the US than make them here. Remember that the tariffs on inputs and components hurt American automakers by raising their cost of production. And one way to balance that out is to freeze wages for American workers. A company doesn’t care where they get the offsets from and labor is an easy place to offset costs.
Which jobs, exactly, do you think importing cars made entirely overseas will create? Car salesmen?
“ That’s how we defended free trade and outsourcing all these years?”
No, free trade is defensible for many, many reasons, particularly lower costs of products and higher profits for American companies. There has never been a free trade argument that says that all jobs will benefit. Because that is a ridiculous argument to make.
According to Boehm, increasing net exports doesn’t happen. At least that’s my guess, since he’s never ever addressed that.
I only buy Japanese vehicles. How does this affect the discount sullums that ride public transportation?
Automakers in America = Imports from Japan????
The BS just keeps coming.
Tariffs = raise taxes on American consumers????
...because only Japan can make consumable goods or what???
The BS just keeps coming.
Ignore Trumps Tax-Cuts and pretend Tariffs is the only Tax around?
The BS just keeps coming.
Boehm BS. It just keeps coming.
I don't think anyone at Reason knows a damned thing about economics anymore.
Trump did this before --and you all preached gloom and doom
And the economy boomed.
Real wages went up. People started to prosper again. Businesses expanded, new ones started.
It took releasing a plague to stop it --and even then it had started to kick back up by October.
And then someone was sat in the White House who undid it all.
And the economy stopped dead.
You're wrong. Again and again and again.
No, Trump did not do this before. What he did before was put tariffs on specific industries, like washing machines. As opposed to imposing tariffs on all imports from certain countries. Not even close to the same thing. I believe I've explained this to you many times, yet you keep repeating the same nonsense.
Ah, so he did different things
But you screeched the same doom and gloom then.
And you were wrong.
Good things happened --not the bad things you 'explained' were going to happen.
Do you understand that when you're demonstrably wrong, over and over again no one cares what you 'explain'?
Because you're wrong.
Reason has good understanding of basic economics, but they don't understand much of the market and economic conditions outside of the country.
Trump could have squeeze Japan and Korea way harder. He didn't. These countries are effectively rich banana republics. Their young people are in particular state of doom and gloom. The notion that any sort of American expansion won't benefit the economy of either partner is ignorance. 15% tariff on the ps6 is teeny compared to the "illegal alien tax" I pay, which comes in the form of cost of living in CA. I paid that for 20 years. Other than maybe medicaid, I got little out of it.
Remember all the moaning about switch 2 prices? Yeah it set launch record for consoles in America. We're the capital of "Here just take my money". Japan needs us real bad. We need them too, but we hold more cards.
one of the more fun things about this ridiculous site is the commenters mocking you hours before you show up with the work.
Dear ChatGPT, how can I turn good news into bad news?
"Japan will invest $550 billion into the United States, and the U.S. will receive 90 percent of the Profits."
https://i.giphy.com/5yuC2vIsQJdoA.webp
Meanwhile, Japan's economic negotiator is all like... that.