Tom Homan's Plan To 'Flood the Zone' in Sanctuary Cities Will Lead to More Due Process Violations
DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and border czar Tom Homan blamed the shooting of an off-duty Customs and Border Protection officer on the policies of sanctuary cities like New York.

Sanctuary cities such as New York City and Los Angeles, which have long been a target of President Donald Trump for not adhering to his immigration enforcement policies, are now expected to face greater scrutiny from the federal government after a recent violent shooting.
On Saturday night, a 42-year-old off-duty Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer was shot near Riverside Park in New York City, per CBS News. At a press conference on Sunday, Democratic Mayor Eric Adams and Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch stated that the officer, who is now in recovery, was sitting on the rocks with a friend in the park when two men on a moped approached them. Miguel Francisco Mora Nunez, a 21-year-old citizen of the Dominican Republic, whom the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) says was detained at the border for entering the U.S. illegally in 2023 but was subsequently released, allegedly dismounted the moped and approached the officer from behind while displaying a firearm. At this point, the officer "realized he was being robbed and drew his service weapon in defense," said Tisch, who cited CCTV footage in her statement. "The perp fired first, and an exchange of gunfire followed."
The officer was then hit in the forearm and face, while Mora, who was injured in his leg and groin, reportedly fled the scene on the moped along with the driver. He was apprehended Sunday at a Bronx hospital following surgery for his wounds. Mora was wanted for a robbery and stabbing in New York, and had prior arrests for assault and violating a protective order, plus a Massachusetts extradition warrant for kidnapping, according to CBS News.
Even though Tisch stated the New York Police Department has "no indication that the officer was targeted for his employment," the incident has galvanized the Trump administration to continue its crackdown on sanctuary cities in the United States.
"Make no mistake, this officer is in the hospital today, fighting for his life because of the policies of the mayor of this city and the City Council. And the people that were in charge of keeping the public safe, they refused to do so," DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said on Monday. While accusing Democrats of culpability in the attack, Noem managed a cry for help, urging "every single mayor, and sanctuary city, and sanctuary governor to change their policies and to change their tactics right now." Noem also claimed that a second suspect was in custody, but provided no details.
Border czar Tom Homan, a vocal critic of sanctuary cities, on Monday called them "sanctuaries for criminals."
"We're going to flood the zone," Homan said. "Sanctuary cities get exactly what they don't want: more agents in the community and more agents in the worksite."
In the second Trump administration, "flooding the zone" has led to the arrest of innocent civilians, racial profiling, and enhanced surveillance of Americans by law enforcement. In June, Los Angeles residents protested enhanced immigration enforcement in the city, leading to riots and the deployment of 2,000 California National Guard members and 700 Marines by Trump as a response. On Tuesday, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D–Ore.) and Rep. Suzanne Bonamici (D–Ore.) introduced bills in the Senate and House, respectively, to block further deployments of the National Guard and require law enforcement officials to identify themselves during operations.
The evidence on sanctuary cities runs counter to the Trump administration's claims about criminality. A 2017 study by the University of New Mexico found "no correlation between a sanctuary city and crime." Some research has linked sanctuary practices to a decrease in both property and violent crime over time because they integrate immigrants into society.
Despite this, the Trump administration appears ready to "flood the zone" of sanctuary cities, which will likely come at the cost of due process and constitutional protections for immigrants and citizens alike.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
An assertion without evidence.
Due process is leftist.
Did you ever bother to learn what due process actually means?
Didn’t Discount Sullum grostulate over the due process afforded the J6ers? Who shot nobody?
The J6ers got lots of due process. Good and hard.
Cite? Still have the link you laughed at then being put in no bail solitary for months unable to see lawyers and doctors. Good times. Good times.
Fuck you, actual fascist.
Sarc, ‘due process’ isn’t what you do behind the bar in exchange for a bottle of MD 20/20.
Sarc can’t learn things. He has boozelexia.
When it comes to the admission or exclusion of aliens, due process is what Congress says it is.
Does what Congress says matter when it comes to federal agencies, federal employment and federal spending? Or does it only matter when it hurts people you hate.
Congress states immigration courts in article 2 oversee immigration. Yet you hate that fact.
Way back when, FDR made sure to send ass much anti-depression fed-money ass possible, to "fence-straddling" districts ass possible, to buy votes. Others got shafted. Shit all depends on WHO you are!
Today, Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer sends $BILLIONS of fed-money to get ICE to raid ALL of the blue states and cities, inflating their living-costs for lack of "illegal sub-human" labor. RED areas? Snot so much! And then... Shitty standards of living (high costs for housing and eating out) will be blamed on... THE LIBS!!! Ya GOT shit, by Jove!!! Trumpistas will MAKE THE LIBS CRY at any and all costs!
Is it your contention that the immigration laws we currently have are unconstitutional? Because that’s my contention on federal agencies or the ability to fire federal employees (of the executive branch).
Spending is trickier because Congress controls the purse, but it’s fucking stupid that all these agencies and bureaucrats HAVE to spend every dollar, by law. There’s some fuckery afoot there, if not outright unconstitutionalism.
More Scenes from New York. The mora person reads about NYC, the worse it appears.
playoffs? playoffs!?! playoffs?
are objections for facts not in evidence limited by a relation to the number of facts not in evidence?
Only true if you dont actually underatand the law or what due process requires.
Even though Tisch stated the New York Police Department has "no indication that the officer was targeted for his employment," the incident has galvanized the Trump administration to continue its crackdown on sanctuary cities in the United States.
I mean, why wouldn't it? Who cares about his employment. An illegal criminal piece of trash SHOT AN AMERICAN. I don't care if that American was a cop, a janitor, a CEO, an artist, a bodega owner, a Reason writer, or the POTUS. That ONE SINGLE INCIDENT should have ICE coming down like the thunder on every single illegal in the country. And especially in that immediate area.
And I'm glad that's what's happening.
"We're going to flood the zone," Homan said.
Do it. Hit it like a Mack truck. Round up every man, woman, and child - send them to Alligator Alcatraz (or better yet, CECOT), and DEAL WITH THIS PROBLEM.
America is 100% on board with you on this, Homan.
And your preferred alternative is . . . ?
He did not tosin any alternatives.
Tom Homan's Plan To 'Flood the Zone' in Sanctuary Cities Will Lead to More Due Process Violations
So, setting aside the "facts not in evidence" aspect of this, would you feel better if they came up with a social safety net balanced out with a binning (pyramid) scheme and literally, knowingly, documentedly sold it as a lie to the American public with a "You have to pass the immigration package to find out what's in the immigration package." bow on top?
>>Tosin Akintola is the summer 2025 Burton C. Gray Memorial Journalism Intern at Reason.
was thinking along the lines of hmmm how would I have answered mad's question when I was summer intern age but then remembered even as a ute I was whatever enough to know not to write something like the subject piece
We are repelling an invasion. We don't have the time or resources to give additional hearings to every invader. This is the fault of previous administrations who let the problem get completely out of hand.
You cant expect an intern to read the actual law before pontificating. This is reason god dammit.
Yes…….’let’. This wasn’t incompetence. The people using Biden’s auto pen were very successful with their plans.
Lol. “….will lead to more due process violations.” than what? A sharp stick in the eye?
They gotta go. They’re not even “due” a ride home, but they’ll get one.
How can I have s'more if I haven't had any yet?
A 2017 study by the University of New Mexico found "no correlation between a sanctuary city and crime."
Maybe time to update that study, no?
I’ll be the people at U of NM were all arch conservatives too. And in no way had a smidgen of bias towards open borders.
Trump is going after Sanctuary Cities and State's because they're not adhering to, "HIS", no not "HIS", the US Federal immigration and enforcement laws.
Fixed it for you.
Next, does it matter what job the victim of the violent crime has? The fact that illegal criminals are allowed back on the street and allowed to continue doing more crime because they are illegal is absurd.
The Sanctuary laws are absurd and they need to be removed. Harbouring known criminals and stopping the Federal enforcement of deportation is criminal and the Sanctuary States and Cities should be held accountable until they remove them.
Meanwhile, in Colorado, our Democratic state AG has announced an investigation of rebel counties and towns that may not comply with the new state law that prohibits any collaboration and info-sharing with ICE. Cunt.
There are about 700 federal judges who could oversee asylum claims. There are 260 weekdays in a year. If each claimant gets one day in court the courts can see 180,000 a year. Since Biden allowed around 10,000,000 illegals into the country it will take 54 years to see them all.
What we have here is a turnstile for entering the US - it allows entry but stops exit.
Check for legal status - if there is none, send them back.
What???? You don't want to pay for all that? Have some humanity and think of the lawyers. And their fees.
According to Jeffy, those lawyers are the only thing keeping them from deporting us too.
You're right, I was wrong. In actuality, the only thing keeping you from being deported is your white skin.
So what? ICE is protecting us. We should not question their judgment if they feel this is the best way to protect us.
Yup. A few weeks ago was out in the sun and got a deep brown tan. ICE caught up with me and deported me. Had to wait until the tan faded before returning to the border.
All white folks is the US - you are implored to wear sunscreen or this could happen to you too.
You’re a bigoted Neo Marxist Sorosite. Did you know that Fatfuck?
Not quite bears-in-trunks level.
Do better.
“The evidence on sanctuary cities runs counter to the Trump administration's claims about criminality. A 2017 study by the University of New Mexico found "no correlation between a sanctuary city and crime." Some research has linked sanctuary practices to a decrease in both property and violent crime over time because they integrate immigrants into society.”
Apples and oranges. That survey was under Trump(45) while illegal immigration was relatively limited, and the illegal aliens kept their heads down. Under Biden, several millions were entering every year, most not vetted. Many were criminals in their native lands (maybe not in relative numbers, but in absolute numbers due to the numbers of illegals who entered this country). And they became brazen, both in their presence, and in their criminality. Anyone who believes that we are safer with that huge influx of illegals in our midsts is, frankly delusional.
Heck, they were so poorly vetted under Biden 2 of those recently arrested actually had INTERPOL warrants out for them. How the fuck do you miss INTERPOL warrants for murder? A shoplifting warrant in Backlybup Somalia maybe, but an INTERPOL warrant for murder?