ICE Is Shipping Detainees to Hawaii as Bed Space on the U.S. Mainland Fills Up
Immigrant detainees transferred thousands of miles from where they were first arrested face unique challenges in immigration court.

As the Trump administration moves to alleviate overcrowding in immigration detention centers, immigrant detainees are being transferred around the country, potentially thousands of miles from their families. Now, immigration attorneys in Honolulu are serving a new kind of client: immigrants arrested on the U.S. mainland with no connection to the island, Honolulu Civil Beat reports.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reached a record-high number of 57,861 detainees in late June amid President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. To meet Trump's deportation goals, the administration has experimented with controversial methods of detaining immigrants in both state-run detention facilities, like Florida's Alligator Alcatraz, and other countries, like El Salvador. Another option is the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), which agreed in February to set aside bed space across nine facilities, including at Federal Detention Center (FDC) Honolulu.
Data show that FDC Honolulu, along with facilities in Miami, Atlanta, Philadelphia, and Leavenworth, Kansas, have seen an increasing number of ICE detainees since the agreement. No data is currently available for the other four facilities in Los Angeles, Berlin, New Hampshire, Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, and Brooklyn, New York.
Once detained, ICE has broad discretionary authority to transfer immigrants to any detention facility, regardless of where the initial arrest took place. Although immigrants have the right to legal representation in immigration court, they do not receive a court-appointed attorney and must retain their own counsel. Transfers between detention facilities—like a 4,500-mile move from Florida to Hawaii—make it difficult for immigration lawyers to represent their clients.
"You can't video conference with them. They can't sign things. They can't review applications that you're going to submit on their behalf," Kevin Block, a Maui immigration attorney, told Civil Beat. "You really do need to be able to have face-to-face contact with them."
Even if a detainee has counsel, if the individual is transferred to another federal district court, they will have to find another attorney who practices in the location where they are being held. And while some courts allow remote hearings, having an attorney unfamiliar with an immigration judge and district practices puts detainees at a disadvantage.
Moving detainees can also cause due process concerns. Neribel Chardon, a pro bono immigration attorney in Hawaii, has a client who "was taken into custody in Florida and went to two detention centers there before he was transferred to Louisiana, Arizona and two facilities in California before finally coming to Hawaii," according to Civil Beat. Although her client was detained on May 4, he wasn't served his charging document until his court date in Honolulu "sometime in the last month." Any challenges to the validity of the charging document, potentially nullifying the charge, can not move forward until the document is first received.
ICE is currently laying the groundwork to provide an additional 100,000 beds and detain more immigrants. Todd Lyons, acting director of ICE, sent a memo on July 8 directing officers to detain immigrants who entered illegally "for the duration of their removal proceedings," no matter how long they've lived in the United States. This new policy could quickly fill those additional beds—potentially for years while cases move through immigration court. Given that the BOP's average cost to incarcerate an inmate was $120.80 per day in FY 2023, and that Americans are now on the hook for $45 billion to house additional immigrants, taxpayers are sure to foot a high bill for the federal government's mass detention protocol.
But the cost of federal immigration enforcement goes beyond dollars. Although the Trump administration claims that ICE detainees are "actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gangsters, and more," nearly half of those in ICE custody as of late June did not have a criminal conviction or pending criminal charges. Detaining individuals who pose no threat to public safety, especially amid serious questions about due process to meet Trump's mass deportation goals, will only serve to degrade constitutional protections for all Americans.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sharkatraz?
Akita Alcatraz not yet fully operational so they had to improvise.
SF is too dirty to send illegal detainees anyways.
There are restrictions on cruel and unusual punishments.
They better have frickkin laser beams.
Don’t even need that. Just put Tiki idols all around the perimeter.
This isnt the Brady Bunch.
Exactly. Illegals don’t have plot armor.
What did Hawaii do wrong to deserve this?
Mazie Hirono.
She might actually be a bigger retard than Patty Murray, maybe even dumber than Hank Johnson.
They should be shipped to Easter Island. Plenty of room and they can marvel at the statues.
Where those statues are based.
ICE Is Shipping Detainees to Hawaii as Bed Space on the U.S. Mainland Fills Up
How to tell me the deportation is working, without telling me it's working.
That would be like telling me "homeless shelters are full as homeless are swept from the streets"
Not so sure
You see, you know how to take the illegal. you just don't know how to deport the illegal. And that's really the most important part of the illegal: the deporting. Anybody can just take them.
Thanks Jerry .
But if they're in Hawaii they're not migrating anywhere further except home.
"But the cost of federal immigration enforcement goes beyond dollars. Although the Trump administration claims that ICE detainees are "actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gangsters, and more," nearly half of those in ICE custody as of late June did not have a criminal conviction or pending criminal charges. Detaining individuals who pose no threat to public safety, especially amid serious questions about due process to meet Trump's mass deportation goals, will only serve to degrade constitutional protections for all Americans."
The advocates of encouraging illegal immigration make the problem so large it is difficult to properly deal with the problem, and then gripe about that as a rationalization to continue to ignore the problems with the policy they imposed on the electorate without asking.
The people who encourage illegal immigration are the people who set up barriers to legal immigration.
Lol. Lots of people immigrate here legally. You just don’t like limits. Tough shit.
You’re a child.
What I like or don't like has nothing to do with anything. Fact is that people want to come here for the opportunity to work and better the lives of themselves and their families. Laws can't change that. Laws can change incentives, but not motivations. What laws do is make it difficult or impossible for many people to do that legally. Thing is, if they're desperate enough they're going to do it illegally. That's how incentives work. The more restrictions you put on legal immigration, the more illegal immigration you're going to get. So if you want to reduce illegal immigration, you need to make it easier for people who want to work to legally come here and work. Then spend law enforcement resources on catching actual criminals who hurt people, instead of going after people who just want to work. You call me a child, yet you appear to believe laws are magic. Well I'm not the one engaging in childish thinking here. No, that would be you.
Fact is that people want to come here for the opportunity to work and better the lives of themselves and their families
Not a fact.
Laws can change incentives, but not motivations
Also not a fact. 1M self deported.
Thing is, if they're desperate enough they're going to do it illegally.
Then they suffer consequences from the laws.
You really are a dumb lefty fuck.
So they can set up gang territories and drug trafficking.
so they can spy on military bases and associated areas.
So they can live off the taxpayers in posh hotels.
So they can rape and murder young women.
So they can BBQ cats and dogs
So they can turn once great cities into shit holes as they have to Minneapolis now called "little Somalia".
There is nothing positive about massive illegal immigration. It is costly to the American people in so many ways as to be criminal.
That whooshing noise was my point flying over your head.
I don't want more illegal immigration. I want more legal immigration. Let people who want to work come here and work, and make the process easier. Yes they need to be checked for criminal history and diseases. But that's about it. And yes there needs to be some system where they have to check in from time to time and prove that they're working. And no they shouldn't be immediately eligible for assistance because the whole point is them getting a job. Let those people come here legally without having to wait for years and years. Do that and law enforcement resources can be freed to go after actual criminals who hurt people and stuff, not rounding people up for the crime of not having their papers in order.
Why do you keep lying? You've defended every illegal immigrant including pedophiles and gang members.
Do you know how many legal migrants come every year?
Meanwhile you keep intentionally ignoring actual costs and even raged at Medicaid and other program changes to kick illegals off.
Youre full of shit.
What you don't seem to understand is that we all want more legal immigration.
AFTER the illegals are sent back.
AFTER we gain control of the border so that millions of illegals aren't swarming them.
THEN we can have a steady flow of legal, vetted immigration.
Tall secure border, big door.
What you don't seem to understand is that we all want more legal immigration.
I'm sorry but I don't believe that. Not one bit. When you praise Trump for creating illegals by revoking parole and revoking visas for people who were following the rules then you're not for more legal immigration. When you praise Trump for banning people from certain countries or people with political views you don't like then you're not for more legal immigration. When you praise Trump for expelling people over political views then you're not for legal immigration. When you go on the attack against anyone who wants to make legal immigration easier then you're not for more legal immigration. Sorry, but actions speak louder than words. I don't believe you or any Trump defender wants more legal immigration.
By the way, if you really want to stop illegal immigration, make it a capital crime. Not life with endless appeals, but straight to the firing squad on conviction. Toss the body into a furnace and dump the ashes in the ocean. That will stop illegal immigration for sure. But is that what we want our nation to stand for?
So you want to reward illegal immigrants despite your claim above you dont.
Temporary means temporary. Some have been on TPS for 25 fucking years.
Your dishonesty is noted.
By the way, you completely missed my point. You want fewer illegal immigrants? Make legal immigration easier. All this nonsense about the need to purge society first says two things. One that you really don’t want less illegal immigration because you still incentivize it, and two that you’re probably lying about making legal immigration easier after the purge.
You missed his point. Fuck you until the current problem is fixed instead of pushing another 86 lie.
we all want more legal immigration.
AFTER the illegals are sent back.
AFTER we gain control of the border so that millions of illegals aren't swarming them.
Okay, let's just pretend this is true for the moment. Let's just suppose Trump can wave a magic wand and send all of the illegals home and make the border as secure as you want it to be. Then, you claim, you would be in favor of more legal immigration. Do you know who would be first in line for that extra legal immigration? The same people you just sent back! So why go through this entire theater of sending them home if only to let them stay later?
Thing is, the border can’t be secured. It’s too big. Besides, is this America or East Berlin?
So when someone says they’ll be willing to change immigration policy only after the border is totally secure, they're saying they have no intention to change immigration policy at all.
So your above post about what you claim to want is a fucking lie then.
How fo you filter out criminals without a forced system to identify criminals dumdum?
Youre again projecting you and jeffs behaviors. How many illegals crossed last month?
You have your head on straight on a number of things, too bad you can’t get over your rabid hatred of Jewish people.
In any event, you should be far more concerned about Islamists, and Islamist sympathizers.
Glad we’ve finally moved on from the idea that these people aren’t refugees looking for asylum, but migrant workers looking for better paying jobs.
Of course, things wouldn’t be so bad in their home countries if they’d stop electing shit leftist…
So you are advocating for open borders then?
So you are for bigotry and xenophobia then?
See, two can play at this game.
I’m saying that unless being without papers becomes a capital offense, desperate people are going to come here for economic opportunity. Just as people are going to drink and do drugs. Making it illegal doesn’t help, short of the death penalty. Which they use for drug offenses in some Asian countries. And they don’t have a drug problem. So short of killing illegals, people are going to come here to better their lives. Accept it, legalize it, and spend law enforcement resources on catching criminals who hurt people. That’s the principled libertarian position anyway.
1M self deported. Border crossings have dropped. It turns out you just need to enforce the fucking law retard.
You continue to spiral with your idiotic lies and narratives.
"The people who encourage illegal rape are the people who set up barriers to legal rape."
Sarc logic
rape = violation of the NAP
illegal entry = not a violation of the NAP
false analogy on your part
Wait until they learn arrests often come before convictions even for citizens.
Reason and their lefty "immigration activists" are legitimately the bad guys creating and exacerbating the problems while trying to call others evil for trying to fix them.
"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies." -Groucho Marx
You and the other Trump defenders are really good at politics. I mean, you're just plain fantastic!
Reason and libertarians are terrible at it though. They just suck.
Youre not a libertarian. Youre a dumb lefty fuck.
They're like the anti-death penalty activists. They lobby to make executions as difficult, painful, and expensive as possible, then use the problems they create as reasons to end the death penalty.
Where can I sign up to get deported?
Canada
What is unique about the challenges?
Prisoners are often houses far from home - especially if they're serious criminals - and the justice system can handle it.
In addition, these people have a ton of lawyers trying to knock down the fence to get to represent them. And it's 2025 - Zoom was good enough during the pandemic so it's good enough now.
Oh, and we also have email and phones.
Obviously illegal aliens were far from home already before they were detained.
Really one of the stupidest arguments is that these people are some how unique. The US has far more citizens in jails and prisons in every jurisdiction and none have a right to be close to home and family. That's part of the punishment and it's neither cruel or unusual. Reason, despite the evidence that their position is unsustainable, will not have an honest discussion about open borders and Autumn's continuing attempts to make the most mundane procedural issues into vicious attacks on human rights reeks of desperation.
Really one of the stupidest arguments is that these people are some how unique.
They are in that many of these detainees have not broken any criminal laws (overstaying a visa is a civil violation), yet they're being imprisoned indefinitely without due process. I know you guys think that's great, but people who love liberty and the Constitution look at people being denied attorneys before being placed before an administrative "judge" who isn't part of the judiciary see a mockery of justice. Of course I know what you're response is going to be. "Whatabout the J6 political prisoners! Whatabout them! Democrats did it first! That makes it ok!"
They are getting the due process as outlined by congressionally passed laws dumdum.
The fact you're ignorant doesn't change this fact. They can be released at anytime by self deporting. They are choosing to stay in detainment.
They aren't like the J6 no bail prisoners held for a year abd threatened with 20 for parading like you celebrated.
I mean, they could agree to self-deport and collect their $1000.
I wonder if any other country is that magnanimous for people who overstay their visas or otherwise enter the country illegally?
If you were an illegal immigrant, not known to the authorities, and you knew that ICE had a quota of 3,000 arrests per day, why on earth would you deliberately make yourself known to the authorities on the "promise" of receiving $1000? Chances are you'd just be arrested and sent to the torture prison instead.
If you were in a foreign country and you were actively being hunted by the law enforcement of that country, what incentive would you have to trust your hunters not to arrest you on the spot once you stepped out of the shadows?
Exactly. They’re arresting people who are showing up to court. Only a fool would believe it’s an honest offer.
And recieve final deportation orders you dumb ignorant fucks.
They aren't letting those ordered to ignore the administrative courts ruling.
God damn you and jeff are ignorant.
I was specifically talking about the people already in detention, as that was the subject of the article AND sarc’s post.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reached a record-high number of 57,861 detainees in late June amid President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown.
Awesome!
Another feel good story from Reason!
Detaining individuals who pose no threat to public safety...will only serve to degrade constitutional protections for all Americans.
How will it do that, Autumn? Show your work.
I had no idea ICE had managed to detain that many. Now, only 9,000,000 to go.
"Detaining individuals who pose no threat to public safety . . . "
Please cite your source.
These are people who have already shown contempt for the rule of law, and each and every one pose a flight risk.
"You really do need to be able to have face-to-face contact with them."
Bullshit.
Do what you did during the Communist Chinese Virus hoax.
This article is a good argument for the need to build even more detention centers to hold the criminals that are in the US, to include illegal immigrants who are criminals for improperly entering the country. 8 US Code 1325: Improper Entry by Alien.
If it were somehow possible to deport all of the illegal immigrants, how do you think the nation would be better? How do you think your personal life or personal situation would improve?
Less human trafficking.
Fewer murders.
Fewer rapes.
Less coerced taxpayer money being given to/stolen by foreign nationals.
Fewer violent gangs.
This is Autumn's most full of sh** article to date. Let's begin.
Transfers between detention facilities—like a 4,500-mile move from Florida to Hawaii—make it difficult for immigration lawyers to represent their clients.
Wah.
"You can't video conference with them. They can't sign things. They can't review applications that you're going to submit on their behalf"
Oh shut up. We figured out ALL of that during COVID. The Justice System did not come to a grinding halt when the Democrats decided to give everyone a case of persistent hypochondria in hopes that it would stymie Trump somehow. A friend of mine filed for divorce, went through the entire process (including mediation), and finalized her decree - and she never even met her attorney in real life or physically entered a courthouse.
It wasn't like, "Well, the COVID stupidity is over, guess we'll go back to the way things were." No, they kept the new tools and strategies. They utilize them. Zoom. BlueJeans. DocuSign. Dropbox Sign. Heck, Microsoft Teams if you're some kind of masochist.
"You really do need to be able to have face-to-face contact with them."
No, you really don't. That's a bogus pity line you're taking because you resent the fact that they're being arrested/detained and dragged to IC in the first place.
Shut. Up. Autumn.
they will have to find another attorney who practices in the location where they are being held.
They will not! Stop huffing coconut milk with Block for 30 seconds and make the slightest effort to learn a thing or two.
You fill out your EOIR-28 - and if you had ACTUALLY talked with an immigration lawyer about anything other than the narrative you want, you'd know what that is - file it in the new jurisdiction, request to appear remotely (they'll never say no), and everything is already done via efiling.
Again, you're trying to paint it as unfair and unjust. It's not. It's actually quite streamlined and you know it.
Moving detainees can also cause due process concerns.
No they don't. Oh, he didn't get his charging document until his court date?
"Your honor, as you can see, service was made earlier today. At this time we'd appreciate a brief continuance to potentially challenge the validity of the charging document. We'll review the documents today and, if warranted, have a challenge as soon as tomorrow morning."
Then go do your job.
ICE is currently laying the groundwork to provide an additional 100,000 beds and detain more immigrants.
Better add a few zeroes to that.
Or provide a far more threatening incentive to encourage self-deportation.
Because if you think this is going to slow down any time in the next three years, you're badly mistaken. Everything else going on in this nation - from tariffs to Epstein to Russia to Israel to DOGE to gutting the swamp - is in a distant second place when it comes to this Administration's top priority of rounding these illegals up and sending them packing.
They are more focused on this than anything else, and they are not screwing around anymore. I wouldn't be surprised if, by this time next year, we're packing them into modified shipping containers stacked 6, 7, even 8 high for lack of any place better to stick them.
Americans are now on the hook for $45 billion to house additional immigrants
Pennies on the Dollar compared to what they're sucking the taxpayers dry for by NOT being rounded up and "housed" pending a swift kick off of American soil.
We'll pay it. We'll pay twice that. These people are GONE.
nearly half of those in ICE custody as of late June did not have a criminal conviction or pending criminal charges
Don't care. If you think anyone's splitting hairs over "good border jumping illegal scumbags" and "bad border jumping illegal scumbags" - then I regret to inform you that your finger is most certainly NOT on the pulse of the nation.
Detaining individuals who pose no threat to public safety, especially amid serious questions about due process to meet Trump's mass deportation goals, will only serve to degrade constitutional protections for all Americans.
No it won't. Because here's the dirty little secret you open border pinkos refuse to admit.
American citizens are not the same thing as illegal aliens.
No matter how much you try to insist otherwise.
Are illegal aliens 3/5 of a person? Are they non-persons? If they have no rights as you say, why not murder them? That way you know for certain that the rats wont come back, and it will be a great deterrent. So tell me, why not? Give one reason why illegals shouldn’t be executed on the spot. No papers, no life. Give police the power to kill anyone who can’t prove they’re here legally. No due process. No trial. Just kill them.
Sorry to give you an erection. Wasn’t my intention.
If they have no rights as you say
Sorry, you'll need to cite that one.