California's Minimum Wage Hike Cost 18,000 Fast-Food Jobs as Employment Ticked Up in Other States
The law transferred wealth from workers who lost their jobs to those who didn’t.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1228 into law in September 2023, which established a Fast Food Council within California's Department of Industrial Relations and increased the minimum wage for 500,000 fast food workers from $16.00 per hour to $20 per hour on April 1, 2024. Newsom celebrated his signing of the bill as "one step closer to fairer wages…by giving hardworking fast-food workers a stronger voice and seat at the table." Former Assemblymember Chris Holden (D–Pasadena), the bill's primary sponsor, described it as "one of the most impactful fast food wage laws that this country has ever seen."
The law was certainly impactful: A working paper recently published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) found that the law increased wages in California's fast food sector by 8 percent relative to the rest of the country. But not all of the consequences of the law were intended or positive for workers.
The NBER paper also found that California's fast food employment decreased by 2.64 percent from September 2023 (when Newsom signed the bill into law) to September 2024, while fast food employment elsewhere in the U.S. increased by 0.10 percent over this same period. The paper's economists estimate that the law caused "a loss of 18,000 jobs that would have otherwise existed in the absence of the policy." This finding is particularly striking considering employment trends in California and the rest of the United States.
The authors note that "fast food employment in California had, in fact, grown slightly more than fast food employment in the rest of the United States prior to AB 1228's enactment." Taking this into account, the economists estimated that California's fast food industry employment contracted by 3.2 percent relative to fast food employment in the U.S. and by 3.5 percent when only compared to states that did not enact minimum wage increases (which bias the estimate downward). California's fast food employment shrank "even as employment in other sectors of the California economy tracked national trends," according to the paper.
The Employment Policies Institute (EPI), a nonprofit research organization focused on the economic effects of employment-related public policies, found a reduction in the average hours worked by fast food employees in California following the passage of the law. The median usual weekly hours worked was 40 from January 2022 to August 2023, prior to the signing of A.B. 1228. However, from April 2024, when the $20 fast food minimum wage went into effect, to May 2025, when the EPI released their findings, the median usual weekly hours decreased to 35, translating to $4,000 in lost potential annual income under the $16 minimum wage.
The median fast food worker making minimum wage before and after April 2024 still experienced an increase in gross earnings of 12.5 percent, even with a a 5-hour decrease in usual weekly hours. This increase in income enjoyed by fast food workers who retained their jobs following the enactment of A.B. 1228 is little comfort to the thousands of fast food workers who lost their jobs.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Seattle Judge orders city to come up with a Master Abatement plan to stop people from jerking off in public. LGBTQI2MAP+ community hardest hit.
Apparently the residents are able to handle it themselves.
There will be stiff penalties.
Sounds like its been a long and hard problem for Seattle to deal with.
A letter to the Seattle Park Board (circa 1930s) protesting unruly behavior in the park noted "there was an element of young people from 'Coon Hollow' who ... come down there and change their clothes right in the open."
The judge wouldn’t have issued that order unless he felt he had enough stroke.
Hey, they're just taking matters into their own hands!
Some folks left the area due to those activities. If the judge’s order quickly reverses the situation, could be a case of premature evacuation. If not, for those that can’t leave, they’ll be stuck between a cock and a hard place.
So the judge pulled a boner here?
Does the judge actually have the authority to order the city to do this?
The gizzt of it is, maybe.
r 500,000 fast food workers from $16.00 per hour to $20 per hour on April 1, 2024.
Small time pikers. $20 an hour. That's so 2020.
Why isn't Reason citing the inflation that will occur on fast food due to the minimum wage hike?
Raising minimum wage only benefits the minimum wage worker for a short time while the companies they work for increase their prices, causing inflation and the workers making minimum wage are back in the same financial boat they were in prior to the minimum wage hike.
Minimum wage hikes always result in a reduction in jobs. Many companies end their full time positions and make the positions part time. This reduces the health care coverages and other benefits for employees as well, making life more difficult for these folks.
In the end it's the companies only who benefit, not the worker.
It seems there's more to this. Like with automation coming in raising the minimum wage for workers makes switching to automation an easier decision which harms communities and tax revenues tremendously and eliminates the minimum wage jobs completely.
Haha.
Nelson Muntz
That's only because Democrats did it. If Trump raised the minimum wage then it would have no effect on employment. None at all. Just like his taxes don't raise costs or prices.
See. Here you had an opportunity to point the impact of the wage increase like you do with tariffs. But no, you had to TDS it and show you care more about hating Trump than criticizing CA.
Fucking drunk clown with nothing to say, and saying it too loudly.
Notice sarc cant actually criticize democrats.
He [Newsome] got the votes for doing this, and the underachieving people who lost their jobs will blame greedy corporations for everything, so it's a win all around.
Somewhat OT but the guy also wants increase to the national min wage, so fitting:
Josh Hawley once again prooves my theory; Josh Hawley is a communist.
https://www.hawley.senate.gov/hawley-introduces-legislation-to-prevent-future-medicaid-cuts-invest-in-rural-hospitals/
Hawley very much hails from the left, and the only people I ever hear even recognizing it are British journos. American journos are too retarded to even acknowledge it, let alone recognize it. I listen to a LOT of British media and the sharpest among them will talk at length about how the core Trump populist coalition politicians (referred to in these pages as MAGA) almost exclusively hail from the left on many economic issues.
The key difference between a Josh Hawley or other Trump coalition Republicans and the Democrats is the Trump coalition wants to limit and/or stop illegal immigration. Democrats want the higher minimum wage and want the border opened so as to keep the economy running... allowing them to work at below-minimum wage jobs and sans benefits. What's fist-clenchingly infuriating about Cato/REASON style libertarians, is they're so fucking retarded that they either refuse to believe or don't realize that's happening. You have to give the Democrats credit: They know exactly what they're doing-- they're wrecking the economy for low-wage and service scale workers while filling that wage-sector with below-minimum, zero-benefit workers. It's literally baked into the plan. That's why the New York Times will support ever-increasing raises in the minimum wage, and then on page 2 will complain bitterly that they can't find anyone to mow their lawn now that Trump has closed the border.
If my choice comes down to "raise the minimum wage to $21/hour but hire illegals under the table to keep the economy from collapsing" or "raise the minimum wage to $13 an hour but stop the illegal immigration" you know which one I'm going with.
Culling the overt Marxists will do a lot of good too.
This is why we need ChatGPT now more than ever.
I live on the border with CA - there are no fast food (or really much of any business) on the CA side.
The "average" workers (that still have jobs) are actually making a small amount more, based on the numbers presented here. They did not take a pay cut, but are actually slightly ahead:
* 40 hours/wk * $16/hr = $640
* 35 hours/wk * $20/hr = $700
So those who have been able to keep their jobs, on average, are actually making a slight bit more, contrary to the story's claim of a $4K cut in annual wages. That is apparently based on the reduced hours yet at the original salary rate, WHICH IS NOT THE REALITY. Because, math.
Now, it's still a stupid government policy that should never have happened, but if you're going to make negative points against it don't give ammunition to those who want to support it that you're making false claims. Though to your benefit, anyone supporting this program doesn't understand math or macroeconomic results, so you're probably safe.
Replacement for Worker A: https://dribbble.com/search/food-kiosk
Replacement for Worker B: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/22/restaurants-looking-for-labor-and-speed-turn-to-robots-.html
Replacement for Worker C-Z: https://www.businessinsider.com/how-robots-revolutionizing-fast-food-kitchens-2023-12
Human resources are simply not worth $20/hr in the fast food (or frankly even the casual dining industry) industry. A manager (or a casual dining head chef) maybe - but literally anyone else there? The value of the job they do is not worth $20. Meaning the employer is forced to take on artificial overhead which nets him absolutely nothing in return. The only reason McDonalds or Taco Bell or Olive Garden can weather it is because they can balance the losses against other states/nations.
But the little guys? They're pulling up stakes and moving to Texas. And taking the jobs with them.
Just think how many of these ex-fastfood workers can later become Vice President of the United States!
The President was a fast-food worker too.
https://www.reddit.com/r/memesopdidnotlike/comments/1gbu3cx/trump_is_low_level_quest_bruh_just_admit_you_have/