OpenAI and Perplexity's New Browsers Make the Monopoly Claims About Google Look Foolish
The market has demonstrated it’s perfectly capable of fostering innovation and competition without government intervention.

The private sector is showing the flimsiness of the Justice Department's argument that Google has a monopoly on the search engine market.
On July 9, Perplexity AI launched Comet, a web browser that promises a browsing experience "as fluid and responsive as human thought itself." Comet offers a choice of artificial intelligence models, including OpenAI's GPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini, allowing for tailored results, complete with citations and links. Meanwhile, OpenAI is "close to releasing an AI-powered web browser that will challenge Alphabet's market-dominating Google Chrome," according to Reuters.
The introduction of these two browsers comes as the Justice Department looks to punish Google for its alleged market monopoly. In October 2020, the department sued Google for violating Section 2 of the Sherman Act by "unlawfully maintaining monopolies in the markets for general search services." The case was decided in the government's favor in August 2024, despite U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta's statement that Google had not "achieved market dominance by happenstance." Instead, he added, "It has hired thousands of highly skilled engineers, innovated consistently, and made shrewd business decisions. The result is the industry's highest quality search engine, which has earned Google the trust of hundreds of millions of daily users."
As covered by Reason's Jack Nicastro, when the Justice Department won its antitrust case against Google in 2024, one proposed remedy was a forced divestiture of Chrome from Google's portfolio, aiming to create a level playing field and "open up the market for rivals and new entrants to emerge." Antitrust experts and smaller search engines, such as Mozilla's Firefox, have opposed the proposed divestiture. Even if it were to go through, "Google would still dominate the [general search engine] market," explains Nicastro, who points out that people would still use the search engine on Safari, Firefox, and Edge.
Today, Google controls 68 percent of the global browser market, and a 89.6 percent share of the global search engine market, its lowest share in over two decades. Advances in technology and shifts in consumer behavior have led to increased competition in the space.
OpenAI has already reached $10 billion in annual revenue, with 500 million users engaging with ChatGPT on a weekly basis, according to CNBC. Perplexity, which launched in 2022, has received backing from several high-profile investors, including NVIDIA, Apple, and Meta (the latter two have sought to acquire Perplexity, according to CNN).
The company's run rate, a forecast of its future performance based on current revenue and financial data, is expected to be more than double its 2024 rate of $80 million by the end of 2025. With over 22 million active users and 13.9 million app downloads, Perplexity appears to be a potential competitor to Google in the market.
The success of companies like Perplexity and OpenAI should demonstrate to the Justice Department that the market is capable of handling dominant companies without heavy-handed government intervention.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It is a Brave new world.
I'm on the Edge of my seat.
Ready for a game of Duck Duck Go(oose)?
We're left with a helluva netscape. The web is crawling with information.
I've got a technical question. I have been programing computers for years, but always weird stuff, and never for any big companies with huge server farms.
There's been increasing discussion of all the AI engines trawling the internet, ignoring robots.txt, all to train their LLMs. On the one hand, the more diverse the training material, the better everyone is, but there are so many LLMs trawling the internet that they slow down regular usage.
How differently do all these trawlers trawl? Are they looking for different things? Would it be possible to have just one trawler which basically copies the web every night, and the LLM and search trawlers copy from it instead of the originals? Archive.org seems like a good neutral trawler, and they could sure use the money and the data.
And how much of a problem are robots.txt files? When I set up my own web site, I've forgotten what I did with robots.txt. Might have not had one, might have blocked everybody. Since compliance is entirely voluntary, the LLMs are not violating any laws, and they want as much training data as possible, unlike search engines which don't necessarily want to index things which robots.txt forbids web browsers from seeing.
How differently do all these trawlers trawl? Are they looking for different things?
I would assume so. There are so many AI engines now, and different models seem to specialize in different things. Of course I can't say for sure, but someone has to be training say... 'pornpen.ai' on different stuff than CHATGPT would use.
"OpenAI and Perplexity's New Browsers Make the Monopoly Claims About Google Look Foolish"
No they don't. They just show that new technology is supplanting search engines. This is how the railroad industry got supplanted by the automobile.
Google is absolutely a monopoly who engaged in predatory practices against competitors, consumers and customers, and it paid elected officials, lobbyists and regulators big bucks to keep it that way.
Then Google's crime is not being a monopoly, but bribing corrupt government officials, and the problem is caused by government, not Google.
Google is government. There's a revolving door between senators offices and several administrations and Google.
The biggest blow to the DOJ case is the record of DOJ themselves.
In 1993, they took on an investigation started by the FTC in 1990. It took until 1999 for them to convince a judge that Microsoft's use of Internet Explorer was anti-competitive and that it should be split into another company. Due to ethical concerns over the judge, that was caught up in the court system for years and overturned in 2001. In 2004 Firefox was released, in 2008 Chrome was released, and by 2010 most users weren't using Internet Explorer.
The government spent 11 years trying to prove that it was impossible to compete with Internet Explorer.
It only took six years for the competition to overtake Internet Explorer.
Yes, and the tech industry was deeply responsible for that. I can't tell you how many of my cohorts in the tech industry were absolutely convinced that Microsoft was a fundamentally evil company, and would ultimately control the internet via the monopolization of IE because it was integrated with the OS.
Oh how I couldn't argue them out of their idea that because there was no pathway out of the desktop OS monopoly, that something had to be done. 30 years later, the idea that he who creates the TV controls the programming on it seems silly.
Cloudflare is the one company that is fighting against the 'theft as business model' that AI presents to what was already a crappy 'advertising steals everything' business model.
'Search' long ago made an implicit deal with website creators. Let us freely wander your site and we'll (eventually) send surfers your way. Google wasn't the first VC-backed search firm to break that deal. They all quickly moved to the 'portal' model - where their goal was to have people wander around different search-owned functions scarfing up all the advertising eyeballs and rendering the Internet only peripherally useful (but lucrative for wasting time --> advertising). Google made it there fast - and killed off the others.
AI completely obliterates even that model. AI searches NEVER deliver any visits to the websites from which they extract everything on which they were trained. It is not fair use - it is overt theft. Absent someone fighting back, it will eliminate all independent websites. Everything will be the VC wet dream of a handful of Big Tech controlling access to everything non-Big Tech.
Government 'understanding' of the 'anti-trust' issues is non-existent. But Big Tech - and its control of AI - and centralizing cartelizing goals for AI - is absolutely the enemy.
WE NEED MOAR LAWZ!