Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death
Europe’s lower GDP, higher electricity prices, and strict environmental regulations impede the use of air conditioning, contributing to the continent’s annual 175,000 heat-related deaths.

Much of the U.S. has been suffering a sweltering heat wave for the past two weeks. Though uncomfortable, particularly in areas with nearly 100 percent humidity like Washington, D.C., most Americans experience heat waves as a sweaty annoyance. Our European counterparts are not so fortunate, thanks to excessive regulations driving up the price of energy and outright banning certain air conditioning units.
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration put 130 million Americans "under extreme heat warnings or heat advisories [last] Thursday…with 282 locations breaking daily heat records," according to The Guardian. CNN reported that at least one death in the St. Louis area was ascribed to the heat wave, but mass casualties have not been suffered stateside. Meanwhile, in Europe, eight people have died across the continent as of Wednesday: four in Spain (two were killed in a wildfire that is believed to be driven by hot, dry conditions), two in France, and two more in Italy, per Al Jazeera.
The situation was even worse during the summer of 2023. The U.K. Health Security Agency estimated that 2,295 deaths were associated with excessive heat. The U.S., meanwhile, recorded nearly the same number of heat-related deaths (2,325), despite having a population (335 million) nearly five times greater than the U.K. population (68 million) at the time.
The United Nations estimates that the European continent accounted for approximately 175,000 heat-related deaths annually between 2000 and 2019. The Environmental Protection Agency, meanwhile, calculates that about 1,300 deaths per year in the U.S. are due to extreme heat. (This translates to four heat-related deaths per million annually in the U.S. and 235 heat-related deaths per million annually across Europe.)
There are myriad reasons why there are so many more heat-related deaths in Europe than there are in the United States. But the most significant explanation might just be the simplest: air conditioning.
David S. Jones, a physician and historian at Harvard University, told CNN in 2023 that the disparity is explained by some combination of the U.S. underreporting its numbers and heat being more lethal in Europe due to the lack of air conditioning. The American-European disparity along this latter dimension could hardly be greater: nearly 90 percent of U.S. households have air conditioning, whereas less than 10 percent of European homes do. The productivity gap between the U.S. and Europe helps explain this disparity.
A new study published in the Journal of Environmental Economics and Management explains that "air conditioning ownership increases households' electricity consumption by 36% on average globally." The study also found that "compared to the other drivers of electricity consumption, air conditioning has the leading marginal effect, also accounting for a significant share of household budgets." In 2023, the average retail price of electricity in the United States was about $0.13 per kilowatt-hour, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration data. In Europe, the price of electricity was roughly three times higher at $0.34 (0.2872 euros), according to Eurostat data.
Air conditioning markedly increases household electricity consumption, electricity is more expensive throughout Europe, and Europeans are poorer. American gross domestic product (GDP) per capita was $85,810 in 2024, while the European Union's GDP per capita was 27 percent lower ($62,434), per World Bank data.
Aggressive environmental targets are also making Europe hotter. Under its Green Deal, the European Commission imposes strict air pollution regulations for heating and cooling and mandates that new buildings be non-greenhouse gas (GHG) emitting. The commission's Fit for 55 package, meanwhile, legally requires the European Union to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by at least 55 percent by 2030. (The energy that powers air conditioning accounts for approximately 1 percent of global GHG emissions.)
To achieve these environmental goals, the commission encourages its citizens to use comfort fans, which "can make a good job at refreshing you while consuming much less energy than air conditioners." If someone were to purchase an A.C. unit, the commission cautions people to "be sure to choose one with the proper capacity and highest efficiency, don't oversize it." Italy, Greece, and Spain even announced temperature limits in public spaces during the 2022 heatwave in an effort to meet these environmental objectives.
Although the U.K. is no longer part of the European Union and is not subject to its environmental targets and associated regulations, it has its own red tape that makes installing air conditioning harder than it needs to be. Richard Salmon, director of the U.K.-based Air Conditioning Company, told CNN that "authorities will often reject applications to install AC 'on the basis of the visual appearance of the outdoor condenser unit.'" Apparently, aesthetics are more important than human well-being in the United Kingdom.
Of course, the lack of A.C. in Europe is also cultural—Mother Jones reports that two-thirds of French people surveyed in a 2021 OpinionWay poll said they did not plan on purchasing an air conditioner due to energy costs and environmental impacts. Still, Europe's stringent economic and environmental regulations are making air conditioners more expensive and less used, which is needlessly jeopardizing human lives.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Funny, I thought it was the muzzi animals that were raping and killing europeans
electricity is more expensive throughout Europe, and Europeans are poorer.
“We need to be more like Europe “.
People who say that should be more in Europe.
Still, Europe's stringent economic and environmental regulations are making air conditioners more expensive and less used, which is needlessly jeopardizing human lives.
But if you reject it for tradition or cultural reasons, you will be ok?
Well at least it's you rejecting it for your own reasons and not the state rejecting it for you.
Hot take: heat pumps are not more effective a cooling down your house. The "efficiency" numbers are a lie, the same way EV numbers are a lie.
Lol.
ctrl+f 'pump': 0 results
ctrl+f 'exchange': 0 results
Clown show.
It's amazing how few people understand what 'efficiency' means when discussing energy use, especially in the context of 'reducing emissions' to fight the self-identifying harpy of climate change.
So often, the word "efficiency" is means "uses less energy [or electricity]"
The proper definition of efficiency is getting the most amount of work for the amount of energy used.
Oh, and for Reason: How do you do fellow kids, isn't this net zero stuff in Europe like... the worst?
It's amazing how few people understand what 'efficiency' means when discussing energy use, especially in the context of 'reducing emissions' to fight the self-identifying harpy of climate change.
For me the incredulity is the living out of the theory of stupidity right in front of everyones' eyes. You will have supposed engineers and physicists on these very forums, nominally well versed in the laws of thermodynamics and heat and mass transfer, who insist that you can get more heat out of sub-freezing air located somewhere else through mechanical manipulation than you can out of anything you can burn right in front of you without any mechanical manipulation.
It's "not even wrong". 101% efficiency. 21+/-2 g of protein from 20g of cricket grubs. The sort of thing that a HS student would get corrected for or would be regarded as clever if he pointed out a teacher making such a mistake, but they believe it. Just abject and utter failure of even the *s*cience public education system for a generation or more.
The continent blanketed in heat pumps with more environmental control efficiency than any continent in history suffers the greatest number of deaths related to overheating. And it would be one thing if for lack of turning them on, but they consume record amounts of electricity (for them) and forego other forms of electricity consumption that Americans and other parts of the world consider standard.
But thermodynamics, and all quantitative physics, are white privilege and, of course, racist.
It's like watching people, in 2025, look at drawings of the old 20s-era wing suits and quadruple-wing (or more) planes saying "Physics says this *should* work." while thousands and thousands of people die jumping off rocks and cliffs, having their wings collapse, or fall off shortly after liftoff.
It must be someone else they know named "Physics" that they're referring to, because the one I know is clearly shouting "WRONG!" as it stacks the bodies for them.
Yeah, but those crashes were not "real" physics. They are ready to try "true" physics, which will definitely work this time.
It's not just cost or government restrictions-- many if not most Europeans believe A/C makes you sick with colds and sore throats and causes your back and neck to seize up. They don't think much of fans either, back and neck-wise.
Yes, I remember being in St Martin , and the French guy said not to run the ac at night or we would get a cough. It was 90 degrees and full humidity.
(We ran the ac, no cough.)
Ha! You actually died, and did not know it. Stupid Americans.
Dang it! I knew i shouldn’t bother paying taxes.
The good news is, you've been registered to vote in Chicago.
Again.
And still owe taxes.
And they just voted to remove Social Security taxes! That's bad timing, bro.
Actually he died from Covid. We all did.
I think it just makes you a pussy.
Not really, but some people are pathetic about it. You can survive a day of 90 degrees and 90% humidity. If that's how it is all summer, I totally get needing AC. Everything will get moldy and nasty without it. There's a reason not a lot of people moved to the South before AC was a thing. But I'd rather have the windows open all summer and suffer through an occasional hot night. And it's none of my business what other people choose to do.
I’d like to know where you’re getting a dew point of 86.7F from because that’s 90% relative humidity at a temperature of 90F.
https://www.calculator.net/dew-point-calculator.html?airtemperature=90&airtemperatureunit=fahrenheit&humidity=90&dewpoint=&dewpointunit=fahrenheit&x=Calculate
I saw that several times in Houston. Actual morning fog outside my house, and temps approaching 90°F.
Not to jump on board entirely with the Europeans, but the Gulf Coast (and I'm sure elsewhere) somehow has the ability to air condition interiors to the upper 60s or lower while maintaining 80+% humidity and, as someone who breaks a sweat at 75 degrees and will sleep in the dirt, it's less comfortable/tolerable than the 90/90.
"Environmental Regulations Are Literally Baking Europeans to Death"
The feature, not a bug.
How is the UN going to achieve it's goal of 250 million humans without a little genocide.
Bonus points for the elderly. Don't have to actively euthanize them if the climate change does it for you.
'Much of the U.S. has been suffering a sweltering heat wave for the past two weeks.'
Experts call it "summer". And they tell us that unless we atone for our fossil fuel sins, it will happen next year and the year after!
Every July it’s the same thing!
"Sumer is icumen in"
Progs: "Noooooo!!!"
Progs are cookoo.
'CNN reported that at least one death in the St. Louis area was ascribed to the heat wave, but mass casualties have not been suffered stateside. Meanwhile, in Europe, eight people have died across the continent as of Wednesday: four in Spain (two were killed in a wildfire that is believed to be driven by hot, dry conditions), two in France, and two more in Italy, per Al Jazeera.'
Meanwhile meanwhile, far more people die from cold--in the US and Europe.
I feel certain those wildfire deaths would have been avoided if they only had ac at home.
As long as survival is not a requirement both rain and wildfire will get rid of your Cockney accent pretty equally.
The money and man hours spent regulating AC to save lives 100 yrs. into the future *could've* been spent better managing grasslands and responding to fires, saving lives today.
Opportunity cost, that which is unseen, yada, yada, yada.
If you die while honoring Gaia, do you go straight to paradise? And how many virgins do you get?
You get recycled virgins.
You get 72 virgins, but they're all males.
BTW, this would be a more fitting story for tomorrow. You know, Independence Day, when we told the Superior Europeans to fuck off. And a holiday we still celebrate with beer and explosives.
And, at least here in the south, copious amounts of tea (iced, of course).
A repeat ...
A poem by Howard Nemerov
Because I am drunk, this Independence Night,
I watch the fireworks from far away,
from a high hill, across the moony green
Of lakes and other hills to the town harbor,
Where stately illuminations are flung aloft,
One light shattering in a hundred lights
Minute by minute. The reason I am crying,
Aside from only being country drunk,
That is, may be that I have just remembered
The sparklers, rockets, roman candles and
so on, we used to be allowed to buy
When I was a boy, and set off by ourselves
At some peril to life and property.
Our freedom to abuse our freedom thus
Has since, I understand, been remedied
By legislation. Now the authorities
Arrange a perfectly safe public display
To be watched at a distance; and now also
The contribution of all the taxpayers
Together makes a more spectacular
Result than any could achieve alone
(A few pale pinwheels, or a firecracker
Fused at the dog's tail). It is, indeed, splendid:
Showers of roses in the sky, fountains
Of emeralds, and those profusely scattered zircons
Falling and falling, flowering as they fall
And followed distantly by a noise of thunder.
My eyes are half-afloat in happy tears.
God bless our Nation on a night like this,
And bless the careful and secure officials
Who celebrate our independence now.
Liked that. Give me back my bottle rockets.
At this point, I'm quite capable of blowing things up in front of my own face. Take mine and give them to the kiddos.
Much of the U.S. has been suffering a sweltering heat wave for the past two weeks. Though uncomfortable, particularly in areas with nearly 100 percent humidity like Washington, D.C., most Americans experience heat waves as a sweaty annoyance.
I do wish people would figure out the differences between relative humidity and what makes people actually uncomfortable, the dew point.
You only have 100% humidity when the temperature is equal to the dew point. You can have a dew point of 20F, with a temperature of 20F, and that’s 100% humidity, but hardly uncomfortable. What you’re talking about, that makes it sticky and uncomfortable is the dew point. An example of this where it is very uncomfortable: a temperature of 95F with a dew point of 75F makes a relative humidity of 52%. Raise that to an 80F dew point (like from Midwestern corn sweat), and it becomes 62% humidity. It is impossible to bake under 100% humidity unless the dew point equals the air temperature, and even then, that only occurs after the solar heating of the day has ended.
That's like dying of drunk driving while testing positive for COVID being listed as a COVID death...
Eh... more like dying of drunk driving while having a BAC over 0.1.
Drunk driving and COVID aren't in any real way causitive or correlated whereas people generally tend not do die of forest fires when there's a foot of snow on the ground.
If you can grasp the "cold weather does not preclude a warming climate" associative/dissociative argument, the distinctions between drinking and driving and COVID vs. dying from heat and wildfire should be pretty easy to conceptually navigate.
Moreover, if you're not sperge dunking or cherrypicking and saying something more akin to "Wildfires, overheating, climate, COVID... It's all junk science!" I wouldn't entirely disagree.
Meh. The wildfire was the cause of death. The fact that the wildfire might have been caused or exacerbated by the heat (ie. "is believed to be driven by hot, dry conditions") does not equate to the heatwave killing those hikers. The wildfire did.
It's the same sloppy reporting statistics as the cases of people dying of other causes while testing positive for COVID being listed as COVID deaths to artificially pump COVID casualty numbers. Or the anti-smoking numbers that include deaths of anyone who ever smoked, even if the cause of death is completely unrelated.
Including these hikers in the death-by-heatwave statistics is disingenuous and serves no other purpose but to artificially inflate the casualty numbers.
Including these hikers in the death-by-heatwave statistics is disingenuous and serves no other purpose but to artificially inflate the casualty numbers.
There's also a *g*lobal context or argument being advanced as well. (Edit: this is notable with regard to your cultural-relevance comment below.) That is, people who die stranded out in blizzards typically get counted as or from "death by cold/exposure". Per your own COVID parsing, sure, the smoke could've obscured their escape route and smothered them and then *neither* the heat *nor* the wildfire killed them.
But, again, I don't exactly think the argument is that Europe should be air conditioning the outdoors to prevent heatwaves (though it is Reason, Europe, and the Environment, I could be wrong) as much as we should be more intelligent about environmental management.
Which, again, given the debate of "Prevent projected climate change or adapt to whatever climate that comes at us?" if you're arguing for the latter, I don't think you'll get many dissenters.
It is lack of environmental regulations that caused the heat wave in the first place.
Wow, retarded beliefs and weak trolling at the same time.
It’s never been hot before!
Which is why despite being harangued that "weather isn't climate" whenever the weather doesn't do what they predicted it would, you know the 'warmists' always believed that weather is in fact climate.
So the lack of environmental regulations caused the Great Dying at the end of the Permian?
It was Exxon and white guys with pickup trucks.
British Heat Waves vs American Heat Waves
Short take: many Americans set their ACs to the temperature of British "heat waves." A British "heat wave" is our comfort zone.
Ping ponging with the above, geographically we experience the same phenomenon internal to the US that the Brits never experience internal to Britain (probably blowing some Reason contributor's minds with the within vs. across borders thinking).
People "freeze to death" in their homes in TX at temperatures that Northerners begin to think about wearing long pants outside. When we visit relatives in FL in Spring, they would bundle up for upper 60s and a light rain and, for us, it was like running through the sprinkler on a hot day.
In the 80s my future wife and I moved from Michigan to Los Angeles in February. Left in the middle of relentless snow with like 13 inches on the ground. Finally got there temps in the 70s and naturally went to the beach. Jumped into the Pacific. The few angelinos there, bundled up and shivering, were aghast.
"Europe’s lower GDP, higher electricity prices, and strict environmental regulations impede the use of air conditioning, contributing to the continent’s annual 175,000 heat-related deaths."
Death by socialist over-regulation.
Somewhere in hell, Hitler and Stalin are smiling.
Can we just for a moment talk about heat related deaths in Africa? On second thought let's not do that. Nobody gives a shit.
OK, true confessions time; I quit reading when he talked about a fire death as heat related.
Does anyone out there know of a libertarian web site?
(Oh wait; if they do, they won't be here)
I guess a fire death is heat related, just not heat wave related.
We gave in and chucked solar panels on our roof. Our electric bill is now around $8.00 a month and we get half of that back from the utility for the electricity we provide them.
Its interesting how where I live, where it routinely gets above 110F every year and is over 100 for 5 months/year that
1) We don't have power outages of any length. Couple hours at the most and they're not common.
2. We have people that live here without AC and we don't die in droves.
Maybe the issue isn't the lack of AC in Europe, whether by regulation or choice?