Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Media Criticism

Terry Moran Insulted Stephen Miller? That's None of the Government's Business.

Karoline Leavitt's threat against ABC News is an attack on free speech.

Robby Soave | 6.8.2025 8:55 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Karoline Leavitt | Hu Yousong / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom
Karoline Leavitt (Hu Yousong / Xinhua News Agency/Newscom)

Terry Moran is a senior national correspondent for ABC News. Over the weekend, his employer suspended him over a statement he posted (and subsequently deleted) on X. In it, Moran described Stephen Miller, deputy White House chief of staff, as "richly endowed with the capacity for hatred."

"You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment," wrote Moran. "He eats his hate."

The tweet drew a fierce rebuke from Vice President J.D. Vance, who described it as an "absolutely vile smear." Vance, of course, is entitled to that opinion. But White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt went a step further, declaring that "we"—i.e., the federal government—would be inquiring with ABC about disciplinary action.

Last night, in a since deleted post, so-called "journalist" @TerryMoran went on a rampage against Stephen Miller and called President Trump "a world class hater."

This is unhinged and unacceptable.

We have reached out to @ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry… pic.twitter.com/HsgusJEIvH

— Karoline Leavitt (@PressSec) June 8, 2025

This is a textbook example of "jawboning"—when the government tries to accomplish some censorship by threatening improper government action. It is exactly the sort of thing that conservatives rightly hated about the previous administration: President Joe Biden, his senior advisers, and various federal employees browbeat social media companies into taking down content that the feds deemed wrong, hateful, or dangerous. They didn't just say that they disagreed with major platform moderation policies: They raised the possibility of punitive legislation against Facebook, Google, and Twitter unless they complied.

Leavitt is free to complain about Moran's comment, as Vance did. But her insinuation that she would be speaking with Moran's manager reads like a threat, and thus like an attempt at censorship. As Jenin Younes, a civil liberties attorney, noted in a reply to Leavitt, the Trump administration issued an executive order to prevent the kind of jawboning that took place under the previous White House. To turn around and do the same thing is obviously hypocritical.

"Journalists and everyone else can say what they want about members of the Administration (and anything else) without having to fear reprisal from the government," wrote Younes. "You should delete this tweet and apologize for your attempted act of tyranny and also failure to understand basic constitutional concepts."

As for Moran's post: It probably was unwise for a straight news reporter to share his spicy speculations about Miller's motivations. Mainstream media organizations have different rules for news reporters and opinion commentators, and it's possible that Moran violated his company's social media policy. He has a First Amendment right vis a vis the U.S. government, not with respect to ABC.

That said, these prohibitions on reporters sharing their own opinions on social media seem increasingly outdated. Does anyone harbor doubts that virtually all straight-news journalists possess deeply held ideological convictions, perspectives, and biases? Isn't it  better to know what they actually think? Large numbers of Americans now get their news from independent writers, content creators, and influencers on social media, Substack, YouTube, and other places—and the most successful voices tend to be upfront about their opinions. Expecting journalists to conceal their perspectives seems quaint and not exactly useful.

Moran's statement that Miller derives "spiritual nourishment" from feasting on pure hate is a tad dramatic. (Emperor Palpatine, anyone?) But Miller is, in fact, a fanatical supporter of deporting not just violent or gang-connected illegal immigrants but everyone who may be in the country illegally. He recently reportedly yelled at representatives of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) because they were prioritizing deportations of violent criminals; Miller reportedly wanted ICE agents to patrol Home Depots and 7-Elevens and arrest anybody who looked like they might not be here legally.

Insults like "fascist" and "Nazi" are frequently overused to describe prominent Republican figures. But it's not exactly insane to say that Miller comes off as kind of hateful.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: As American as Due Process

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Media CriticismImmigrationWhite HouseDonald TrumpFree SpeechFirst AmendmentTrump AdministrationTwitterFederal government
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (74)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    Snowflakes. Oh well. It was a mostly peaceful exchange.

    Government sucks. All people eventually realize that government does most of the evil things in the world. Unfortunately, they never realize it at the same time, and the realization never endures.

    1. IceTrey   2 months ago

      Because government is allowed to initiate force. Prohibit government coercion and it could only be benevolent.

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        How do we prohibit government coercion without government use of force to enforce it? Isn't coercion a defining characteristic of government?

    2. bye   2 months ago

      Okay but do you anywhere say Terry Moran is a disgusting hate-filled creep ?

    3. bye   2 months ago

      Evil on a large scale is often government. But attacks on that evil are often government. YOu needed to be around for Hitler or Stalin or Mao then you wouldn't be such a wuss. Government stopped Hitler, else you and your spoiled deluded family might have been murdered. You have the luxury of being publicly stupid because you live in a country that allows you.

  2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    What was the threat?

    Youre on this story a lot faster than you were on Biden admin pushing censorship. Or media hiding Bidens mental state. Or then being an arm of the DNC.

    Then your ally Sullum celebrated a 750 M judgement against fox news.

    You know… not everyone thinks journalists are a paragon of integrity. Moran has always been openly biased. ABC CEO has openly stated they are trying to go to a more neutral unbiased news agency.

    1. con_fuse9   2 months ago

      Stop it with the BDS...
      According to you Biden was brain dead for 5 of the 4 years he was in office. Now you are using Biden's performance to justify Trump's?
      Trump and the more vocal people of his administration are petty little children who can't let a simple slight go unpunished.
      What? Cancel him? I thought right wingers were not part of the "me too" generation.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        It's so cute when dumdum like you project.

        You couldn't even answer the question of what the threat or actual action was. How precious.

    2. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

      What a stupid about-face. You sure screamed about Biden's censorship threats.

    3. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Yeah I don't see any threat here.

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        If they already contacted ABC to make sure he was being adequately punished, then it isn't a threat, it's an action.
        I will point out that saying you're going to tell mom is a threat, even if it's toothless. Saying "straighten out or we'll have a talk with your employer would have been a threat. Not an illegal one, but also not something I would like to see a representative of the president doing either.

  3. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    This is what gets Reason up in arms. Press secretaries.

    Not actual government coercion and collusion to suppress speech that actually happened, but the equivalent of mean tweets.

    1. Clipton   2 months ago

      Bingo. Pearl clutching over non-issues dressed up First Amendment violations.

    2. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

      Right, because press secretaries are completely independent and mouth off all the time without asking their bosses.

      1. Incunabulum   2 months ago

        Well, yes. They do. See Biden's press secretaries. See Trump's - combative media coverage gets a like response.

  4. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    >"It is exactly the sort of thing that conservatives rightly hated about the previous administration:

    Yeah, but you didn't care. If you didn't care why should they?

    We didn't make the new rules, but these are the new rules.

    1. SRG2   2 months ago

      We didn’t make the new rules, but these are the new rules.

      They are not and were not the new rules - but this is merely a variation of "they did it too".

      1. Incunabulum   2 months ago

        Those are the new rules.

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Great, you win the pointing out inconsistency award. Now what do you care about? I was against it when Biden was president and I'm still against the government putting pressure on employers and media outlets to control speech.

      1. bye   2 months ago

        So now Zeb thinks Zuckerberg really saw the light, How naive.
        He saw where his bread was buttered and acted accordingly, not with high morals or any of Zeb's supposed virtues.

    3. Zeb   2 months ago

      And the rule for people in government is obey the Constitution and laws. The Biden admin was breaking the rules. If you oppose that, then you should be an absolute stickler for the rules as applies to the administration that is supposed to be an answer to the lawlessness of the previous admin.

  5. Clipton   2 months ago

    What was the actual "threat" from the Trump Administration? Calling management because an employee violated that management's policy isn't a "threat" it's follow up to see if ABC is serious about its alleged "neutral" reporting or whether it's all just public relations fluff. It seems like Reason keeps running these pieces on straw arguments they manufacture. It's getting really tiresome.

    1. con_fuse9   2 months ago

      If someone is an asshat, and you report that he is an asshat - that is still neutral reporting. Facts are neutral. Well, at least until Trump started spouting them.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        So twice you were asked what the threat was and twice you were unable to explain. How cute. So just TDS then.

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        You're an asshat; fuck off and die, ass-wipe.

  6. GOD OF PENGUIN ISLAND   2 months ago

    Meh

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Stop threatening Robbie with apathy.

  7. Don't look at me! (I have soft power)   2 months ago

    Sounded like hate speech to me.

    1. con_fuse9   2 months ago

      Which is still protected by the Constitution.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        So is a press secretary speaking. Glad we cleared that up.

      2. Otto Penn, American President 2021-2025   2 months ago

        So why do you hate the 1st amendment?

  8. swillfredo pareto   2 months ago

    It is exactly the sort of thing that conservatives rightly hated about the previous administration:

    I am not going to pretend to speak for conservatives but that's not how I see it. The focus of the hatred is exactly where it should be in both cases: on the legacy media. During the Biden administration members of the media dutifully dropped to their knees and took load after load, licked their lips and regurgitated exactly what they were told to say: the president was not senile and corrupt, the president's son was not crack addicted and corrupt, the vice president was not a sputtering imbecile and corrupt, and anyone who posited that COVID came out of a ChiCom lab was a corrupt racist standing somewhere to the right of Mengele. Now that Trump is back, the media has re-discovered its adversarial relationship with the office of the president and can't even see straight through their naked hostility.

    The contempt is precisely where it should be.

    1. con_fuse9   2 months ago

      And how many people got fired for saying the President was senile or his son was a criminal or I believe enough people (even John Stewart) said COVID came from a lab.

      Did they loose security clearances, did their lawyers get black listed by the government? Did they send in the Marines to enforce martial law?

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Wow there is a lot of ignorance.

        Scientists literally got banned on social media. People who's career were on YouTube got banned from there. Biden went after trumps lawyers.

        So you're a partisan retard.

        1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

          You're actually calling someone else a "partisan retard"? Son your partisan Trump-worship is so abrasive and all-consuming your entire house must be a shrine.

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            "You’re actually calling someone else a “partisan retard”?"

            Yes, dumber than a bag of rocks; you are a partisan retard and that's just the beginning.
            Fuck off and die, shitstain.

          2. Ersatz   2 months ago

            Other than the final epithet he was merely schooling someone for their ill informed opinion. Your inference of 'Trump-worship' shows your bias and ignorance.

      2. Incunabulum   2 months ago

        The media wasn't saying those things though. They were supporting the admin's lies.

      3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        At least one got murdered by a cop, partisan retard.

      4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        BTW, one was murdered by a cop, shitstain.

    2. JohnZ   2 months ago

      Precisely. Every network and every cable news outlet. every newspaper and nearly every on line news service.
      There were those who refuted the Covid crap, who questioned Biden's health and openly questioned who was actually running the White House. Now we know, it was Otto Penn.

  9. AT   2 months ago

    "Journalists and everyone else can say what they want about members of the Administration (and anything else) without having to fear reprisal from the government," wrote Younes.

    Hide behind the child, right jihadi?

    1. AT   2 months ago

      Reason Narrative: Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt went a step further, declaring that "we"—i.e., the federal government—would be inquiring with ABC about disciplinary action.

      Actual Statement: We have reached out to ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable.

      Hmm.

      Seems to me they were just curious about ABC's standards for journalistic integrity. You, Narrative Boy, took and ran with that as OMG MUH JoUrNaLiSm!

      Conveniently forgetting the fact that every single actual American hates jOuRnaLiStS and wants all of them lined up and executed as the traitorous enemies of the People that they are.

      Want an example why?

      But Miller is, in fact, a fanatical supporter of deporting not just violent or gang-connected illegal immigrants but everyone who may be in the country illegally.

      Like most Americans.

      Want another example?

      Insults like "fascist" and "Nazi" are frequently overused to describe prominent Republican figures. But it's not exactly insane to say that Miller comes off as kind of hateful.

      "Insults are overused. *uses an insult*"

      It's not exactly insane to say that YOU come off as kind of hateful too.

      1. Tony   2 months ago

        You understand that the US constitution forbids the summary execution of journalists, yes?

        Gee I wonder why you’re called a fascist. It’s so mean.

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          No it doesn't. If a journalist commits a capital crime they can still be executed retard.

          1. Tony   2 months ago

            The capital crime you just pulled from your fascist ass, perhaps?

        2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          Oh, the asshole known as Tony shows up again. I'd hoped you drank yourself to death, shitbag.

        3. Otto Penn, American President 2021-2025   2 months ago

          So you dropped your Molly Godiva sock? You just not be feeling pretty today.

        4. AT   2 months ago

          Reason Narrative: Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt went a step further, declaring that “we”—i.e., the federal government—would be inquiring with ABC about disciplinary action.

          Actual Statement: We have reached out to ABC to inquire about how they plan to hold Terry accountable.

          Explain it. Explain the difference between those two statements before you start whining in defense of "journalists". Who are anything but at this point.

          Double-dog dare you, punk. Explain why the actual statement is so radically different from the narrative, and explain how that's a "journalist" doing "journalism."

  10. Rick James   2 months ago

    They're just asking nicely.

  11. Kafir   2 months ago

    Nice news network you've got there. Be a shame if something happened to it.

    1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

      Abc is a news network?

      1. Zeb   2 months ago

        Sure. News has always been propaganda. Do you imagine that there has ever been a news network without an agenda to promote?

        In any case, it doesn't matter if you can fairly call them a news network or not. The 1st amendment doesn't say anything about news.

    2. Anastasia Beaverhausen   2 months ago

      May Trump choke on an orange.

      1. tracerv   2 months ago

        May you choke on a dick.

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Tony would offer.

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        May you eat shit and die.

      3. Otto Penn, American President 2021-2025   2 months ago

        Yep, it’s getting real fucking bad for you democrats. I suggest our complete and unconditional surrender, before your really get hurt.

    3. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      You mean seditionist propaganda center? Yeah, it is

      1. Kafir   2 months ago

        No, you’ve got me all wrong. I was thinking about Fox News in 2029, under the Elizabeth Warren/AOC administration …

  12. Bipedal Humanoid   2 months ago

    Soave swinging on Sullum nuts.

  13. JohnZ   2 months ago

    ABC
    Always
    Been
    Crap
    “There are two things I live by, number one, I don’t believe anything the government says and number two, I don’t take very seriously anything the main stream media says.” George Carlin.
    The entire MSM is filled with sanctimonious hypocrites and outright liars. Accuracy and truth is something you will NOT find in today’s media. The real truth is the MSM is controlled by the CIA. Everything they report is filtered through the CIA. All of it. For the most part they are nothing more than propaganda outlets for the government.
    Every time the zio-cons in Washington want another war, they can always count on the liars, frauds and sold out puppets of the so called legacy media to do what they’re told.
    Never believe anything they say about anything.

  14. Nelson   2 months ago

    He’s not wrong. Miller is a vile ball of anger, hatred and bigotry. He’s what ever sub-average loser you went to college with would become if they were to weasel their way into power.

    1. IceTrey   2 months ago

      He was the only person who defended the Duke lacrosse team and he was right.

    2. Otto Penn, American President 2021-2025   2 months ago

      No, you just hate him became you’re losing badly. And Miller is part of the reason why.

    3. damikesc   2 months ago

      He's...you, Nelson?

  15. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "...It is exactly the sort of thing that conservatives rightly hated about the previous administration: President Joe Biden, his senior advisors, and various federal employees browbeat social media companies into taking down content that the feds deemed wrong, hateful, or dangerous..."

    One major difference here, which is clear to those without a raging case of TDS, Soave:
    This was done in clear light of day, while whoever was acting POTUS in the last admin did it totally (it was hoped) in the dark, attempting to make is seem as if the outlets were sympathetic to the acting POTUS desires rather than responding to veiled threats.
    Quit lying.

    1. Zeb   2 months ago

      That's a fair point. Much of the stuff under Biden was an attempt to manipulate public opinion and was kept as hidden from people as possible. I'm still not a fan of this kind of thing, but it's much less deeply evil and mostly just kind of annoying. I have no problem with kicking people out of the press corps, but beyond that, it's not an issue for the government to get involved in.

      1. bye   2 months ago

        YOu think you conceded , you didn't.
        Biden pushed hard for the Government Disinformation Board, most overt government silencing move of my lifetime. You defend it or you didn't even know about it. Either way, you can be ignored

  16. Anastasia Beaverhausen   2 months ago

    " Large numbers of Americans now get their news from independent writers, content creators, and influencers on social media,"

    That's why large numbers of Americans are uneducated idiots who live in echo-chamber bubbles - they're not reading or listening to actual trained journalists.

    1. Don't look at me! (I have soft power)   2 months ago

      LOL @ experts.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      Ass wipes like you find that important. Fuck off and die.

    3. Marylandman, battling for a truth Justice, and the American Way   2 months ago

      Do you understand that most of the idiots you watch on CNN and MSNBC have no journalism training whatsoever?

  17. IceTrey   2 months ago

    No one is above the law right?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

America's Reliance on Boeing Is a National Security Liability

Sophia Pappalardo | 8.12.2025 4:41 PM

Andrew Cuomo Proposes 'Zohran's Law' To Fix the Unfairness of Rent Law Cuomo Signed

Christian Britschgi | 8.12.2025 4:11 PM

San Francisco's All-Electric Ordinance Will Make Housing More Expensive

Tosin Akintola | 8.12.2025 2:50 PM

Forget Obama: Trump's Pen and Phone Are Bigger Even Than FDR's

Matt Welch | 8.12.2025 2:30 PM

To Truly Fix Debanking, We Need Structural Reforms

Jorge Jraissati | 8.12.2025 1:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!