Nippon Steel Will Finally Get To Buy U.S. Steel. The Deal Likely Ensures More Federal Meddling in the Future.
The federal government will reportedly get a "golden share" in U.S. Steel, potentially allowing it to overrule shareholders on some decisions.

The Trump administration is finally getting out of the way of Nippon Steel's acquisition of U.S. Steel—but in a way that seems to ensure more federal meddling in the future.
It has been more than 17 months since U.S. Steel, a private company, struck a deal to be bought by Japan-based Nippon Steel for about $15 billion. Before the deal could be finalized, however, then-President Joe Biden swooped in to block the transaction, citing national security concerns that were never well defined. After an extensive review by the Biden administration found no reason to block the deal, Biden unilaterally decided to derail it anyway. During last year's campaign, President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance sided with Biden (and U.S. Steel's union) and opposed the deal.
But Trump has abruptly changed course. On Friday, he announced "a planned partnership" between the two companies. In a statement posted to Truth Social, the president said the deal would "create at least 70,000 jobs, and add $14 Billion Dollars to the U.S. Economy."
The details of the deal remain cloudy, but it seems like Nippon will invest $14 billion to take over U.S. Steel, with a few caveats. On Sunday, Trump told reporters that the deal is "an investment and it's a partial ownership, but it'll be controlled by the U.S.A," according to the Associated Press.
On Tuesday morning, Sen. Dave McCormick (R–Pa.) told CNBC that the deal ensures an American CEO will continue to run U.S. Steel (presumably as a subsidiary to Nippon Steel) and that the federal government will get a "golden share" in the company. That would "essentially require U.S. government approval of a number of the board members. And that will allow the United States to ensure that production levels aren't cut," McCormick said.
If true—none of this has been disclosed officially yet—then the federal government would effectively hold a majority stake in what remains of U.S. Steel after the Nippon acquisition is completed. In short, Trump would have converted Biden's meddling in the affairs of a private company into an official, permanent place for the federal government on the board of U.S. Steel—which is, I stress once again, a private company.
So-called "golden shares" originated in Britain during the 1980s, when the British government used the arrangement to retain control over companies that were privatized, including several utilities and Rolls-Royce. More recently, they have been used by the Chinese government to exert direct control over supposedly private companies.
It is not surprising to see the U.S. following in China's footsteps in that regard, but it sure is disheartening. While Trump appears to have made the right decision in standing aside and allowing this deal to go through, the inclusion of a "golden share" for the federal government would be a worrying precedent that is likely to chill future investment in American companies.
There was nothing objectionable about the original U.S. Steel/Nippon Steel deal. It was always ridiculous for the federal government, under Trump and Biden, to suggest that Nippon Steel, a publicly traded company based in a close American ally that already operates several steelmaking facilities in the United States, is any sort of a national security threat.
Biden's decision to unilaterally block the deal was a dangerous, disgraceful expansion of executive power that relied on a willingness to stretch the definition of national security beyond any reasonable point. Trump, unsurprisingly, has used that leverage to extend the federal government's control over decisions that should be left to executives and shareholders. All of this will make it easier for Trump (or the next president) to meddle in the future of U.S. Steel, or to apply the same terms to a future foreign investment in any business a future president decides to call a national security threat.
Credit Nippon's negotiators for doing what needed to be done to land a deal that's in the best interests of shareholders and workers on both sides of the Pacific. But don't cheer the bipartisan effort to expand executive power in the marketplace.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Heh, we gotta piece of the action.
Eric has no knowledge of supply chains or supply chain risk.
We just saw what can happen by selling industrial plants to foreign nations. China bought and shut down numerous blast furnaces in England to not increase supply, but to advantage one of their key industries in China.
https://news.sky.com/story/last-uk-blast-furnaces-days-from-closure-as-chinese-owners-cut-off-crucial-supplies-13341457
The main crux of the deal with Nippon was to garner requirements for the steel plant to not be shut down in the US. Keeping supply and defense risk down. Unlike in the UK, who now has to buy foreign steel, the US has an invested interest in maintaining the production industry, while also keeping market supply independent of other nations.
Now I know Eric is a fan of the creation of dependency on foreign nations, but this dependency and supply risk is bookmarked as a cost for consumers of steel. Likewise we've already seen what happens on reliance of key materials from other countries.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-steel/china-to-carry-out-steel-inspections-as-cracks-down-on-low-grade-metal-idUSKBN19V0G4/
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13531297/Boeing-Airbus-planes-constructed-fake-Chinese-titanium-cause-jets-break-apart-mid-air-FAA-fears.html
This is of course another cost that Eric remains ignorant to.
Soooo, you were just a libertarian because it gave you cover to be a racist??
People are familiar with your comment history, dumb fuck.
Do you think Trump still masturbates??
Nationalized industry is good! Why do these Kulaks not understand? Tell em comrade!
Nipton Steel would not have moved US Steel off shore, they were buying an American brand to gain access to American markets. Now they'd probably shutter some plants up North for better labor conditions in the South. But the Union scum won't allow that and got their cronies in Washington to sink the deal under Biden and now have Trump doing their bidding.
Bought by Nippon Steel for $15 billion in 2025.
It was created and capitalized in 1901 for $1 billion. The world's first billion $ company. A 2.2% compounded annual growth rate over 125 years. Way below any reasonable cost of capital.
What a piece of shit.
Now do Elizabeth Trump & Son.
“No you!”
US Steel has been mismanged for generations. It refused to modernized its plants, and when they started getting hammered by the European and Japanese steelmakers that had adopted modern technology, it whined that it was facing unfair competition. The union was right with management on this one. Ronald Reagan, a free trader (unlike Trump) refused to impose tariffs, but he did allow some tax credits to be given so that it could use the savings to modernize its plants. Corporate Welfare.
But US Steel used the savings to buy an oil company instead. I am not creative enough to make this up. US Steel should have gone out of business decades ago.
And now it will never go out of business because it is now a socialist enterprise. With a Japanese part owner getting profits no matter how badly it is run, because socialist enterprises never go out of business.
Yet so called Libertarians still support Trump.
I think you could count the libertarians in these comments on one hand.
*cue the retards*
It's a relic of a different age. The largest employers in 1955 were GM, Chrysler, USSteel, Esso, Amoco, Goodyear. Obviously tells you why we chose to subsidize and base our long term infrastructure around cars. But that was pure cronyism. It didn't improve that manufacturing base.
Today, the largest employers are WalMart, McDonalds, Kroger, IBM, Home Depot, UPS, Target, Amazon. Not one good job outside the HQs of them and IBM. But it tells you why the US elites bullshit Americans into thinking that only consumption matters
The largest employer is the US government.
"an investment and it's a partial ownership, but it'll be controlled by the U.S.A,"
Obama must be so proud of Trump, continuing his legacy.
At least Obama sold the government stake in Citi. But unsurprising you had to bring up anyone else to deflect from this piece of Trumpism.
The original deal should never have been blocked. Biden was wrong.
2025 News....
The USA is now being sold-off to foreign entities to pay for it's debt-riddled "entitle me" population.
...because of course ... only foreigners can make sh*t!
Sorry, but no. Americans CAN make shit. They simply refuse to make shit.
Indeed. Who's going to want to make sh*t when everything they make gets STOLEN by the lazy "[WE] Identify-as 'poor' and 'oppressed' therefore need Gov-Guns to steal for us" gang.
There's no reason everyone won't eventually join the STEAL for us gang at which point all that is left is just dog-eat-dog. Which is about where this nation sits especially with a [D]-trifecta controlling the Gov-Guns.
Government has never touched anything that it didn't screw up royally. This example, of course, will be no exception.
Trump does one thing I applaud- followed by 15 stupid things like this.