The GOP Tax Bill Will Add $2.3 Trillion to the Deficit, CBO Says
That total could double if temporary provisions in the bill become permanent, as is likely to happen.

The major tax bill that Republicans hope to pass through the House later this week will require the federal government to borrow more heavily for the next five years, while postponing spending cuts and other deficit-reducing measures until 2028 or beyond.
In many cases, those future spending cuts and tax increases are unlikely to ever materialize. Instead, they seem meant to manipulate the calculations done by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and other independent entities that assess the budgetary impact of legislation.
Even with those gimmicks included in the bill, however, the CBO estimates that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will add more than $2.3 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years. The bill would increase borrowing by more than $400 billion in each of the next four years—topping out at nearly $600 billion in new borrowing in 2027.
The House bill will add $600 billion to the 2027 deficit, based on CBO. pic.twitter.com/NDWR8QZbQa
— Marc Goldwein (@MarcGoldwein) May 21, 2025
Other assessments of the bill by the Yale Budget Lab and the Penn Wharton Budget Project expect it to add more than $3 trillion to the deficit, as written.
As the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget noted in its analysis of the tax bill, 70 percent of the bill's non-interest borrowing will occur in the first five years, while most of the deficit-reduction efforts occur in the second half of the 10-year budget window.
Be skeptical about that second part. Many of the most high-profile parts of the tax bill—the expanded child tax credit, a provision exempting tips from income taxes, and a new tax-advantaged savings program for parents and children—are set to expire in 2028 and 2029.
No one realistically expects them to vanish at that point, but by making those provisions "temporary" in the bill, lawmakers can game the CBO scoring process and limit the perceived impact on the deficit. After all, what good is a long-term savings program for parents and kids that disappears after a few years?
A plan to add a work requirement to Medicaid, the joint federal-state health insurance program for the poor, also won't take effect until 2028. The estimated $300 billion in future budgetary savings created by that provision will materialize only if a future Congress doesn't postpone or abolish the work requirement.
"This is Washington gimmicky budgeting of the highest order, since exactly zero human beings think that the later-year spending cuts will actually kick in," wrote Paul Teller, executive vice president of Advancing American Freedom, a conservative think tank, in a post on X. "In order to save America, the spending cuts must be real, must be significant, and must start now!"
Unlike the CBO, the Yale Budget Lab also ran an estimate that assumes the temporary provisions in the bill are made permanent. If that happens, the bill would add $5 trillion to the deficit over 10 years.
In other words, the CBO's estimate that the bill will add only $2.3 trillion to the deficit over 10 years might capture less than half of the actual borrowing that would occur if this bill becomes law.
With the country already deep in debt, and with that debt now pushing interest rates higher and slowing economic growth, committing to trillions of dollars of additional borrowing over the next decade seems wildly irresponsible.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Economic forecasts are renowned for accuracy.
Economist Antony Davies had an interesting observation. CBO is terrible at predicting government spending or tax revenue but it _is_ really good at predicting GDP. Given that taxes are almost always 18% of GDP, you can quite accurately predict tax revenue with some simple math.
That prediction turns out to be much more accurate than CBO's official predictions of tax revenue. If you ignore their official projections, they accidentally give you the right value.
CBO operates in an alternative universe where everyone just pays their taxes such that taxes have no effect on behavior.
Word and Numbers is heresy in these comments because I suggested it.
You are all about "facts". Wow.
Sarc is about facts like a fish is about mountain climbing.
Are you claiming rhe decades long proven wrong predictions of CBO are right this time? Makes sense as yo your other statements.
It’s 2025–Democrats generally get the deficit manageable in year 5 of the 8 year term and Republicans generally blow up the deficit. Kamala would have had the deficit manageable by next year…this tax cut is insane.
Great comedy.
What is the point of believing #fakenews?? It’s so weird!
It is not the spending that adds to the debt. No. It is cutting taxes that adds to the debt, because the government owns everything you own and it allowing you to keep more of your income "adds to the debt" just like spending. The government owns everything and is doing you a favor when it lets you keep more of your income. How very libertarian a position for reason to take.
The CBO is full of it.
What about actual data?? Clinton gave us a surplus and Obama had the deficit manageable by 2014. Kamala would have had the deficit manageable by 2026. Bush inherited a surplus and exploded the deficit and then Trump inherited 3% deficit/GDP ratio and exploded the deficit.
This is literally one of the best possible scenarios we could expect. It could have been 10x this much in other timelines.
Why is it every bill with the "BBB" acronym is terrible? We're two for two now.
Maybe "BBB" really stands for "Behemoth Bastardized Bollux".
Snark aside, why do we need to continuously mention that "this bill puts tax cuts early, spending cuts later, claims the provisions will sunset in 9.9 years to game CBO rules, and no one expects it to play out that way." Yeah, and fire is hot and water is wet. I think we've said that about literally every tax or spending bill for the last 20 years.
I know the CBO rules were put in place with the best of intentions but perhaps it's time to admit they don't work the way we hoped?
You never complained about Democrat budgets you hypocrite. That makes whatever Republicans do ok.
Correct. You defended even loan forgiveness. You support dem spending while demanding only the GOP cuts. Again, because you're a hypocrite.
But only cuts that Congress sprinkles holy water on.
It's the one place he can't say democrats did it first.
To be fair, Democrats just wouldn’t pass budgets sometimes, so there was nothing to complain about.
It’s 2025!!! Clinton and Obama handed off very good budget situations to Republicans. Kamala would have had the budget at 3% deficit/GDP ratio by 2026. Basically a dude with a pair of hairy smelly balls playing girls college volleyball is going to end up added $5 trillion to the deficit. Maybe the most insane outcome for Democrats supporting a stupid thing in history!! Literally all of human history!!
I remember when. The CBO said ACA would decrease the deficit. Good times.
Obama had a 3% deficit/GDP ratio by 2014. Republicans might be the dumbest group of people in history!!
MAGAs who don't believe the CBO: Do you really think the GOP bill will reduce the deficit?
This is all insanity. And the crazy thing is the only daylight between Democratic and Republican policies is the deficit! For the exact same GDP growth and energy production we could have 3% deficit/GDP ratio by 2026 and instead Republicans have chosen to explode the deficit!?!
the only daylight between Democratic and Republican policies is the deficit!
My god, it's not sentient is it?
Trump surrendered to the Taliban. We have more abortions per year since Roe was overturned. Biden’s Title 9 EO allows organizations to exclude dudes in women sports. Republican governors other than AZ implemented Covid mitigation measures in 2020 (AZ had the highest Covid death rate btw). Kamala would have accepted the 747 from Qatar. Biden made us energy dominant.
Not only is none of that true, it doesn't even make sense, Shrike.
If you're going to play 'bot' at least run your crazy invective through ChatGPT first so it's comprehensible.
Can you show us one of their projections that was correct tony?
Why don’t you just look at the data? What was deficit/GDP ratio in 2019 and 2004?? What was the ratio in 2000 and 2016??
Go on. Fill us in.
Look at FRED.
No.
You write it here.
(I actually all ready did, which is why I want you to write it here)
Hey fag, since when have you given a shit about the deficit? Certainly not when Obama and Biden were in office. They could pass a $10 trillion budget and you would cheer as long as the money was wasted on trannies and illegals.
Obama had 3% deficit/GDP ratio by 2014. Trump had it to 4.6% by 2019 with no increase in GDP growth.
"Why did Shrike pick 2014 rather than 2012 or the end of his term in 2016?" I pondered to myself. "Is he cherry-picking?"
He certainly was.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/FYFSGDA188S
Strange that he didn't boast about his hero Bush being at -1.1 just before Barry, either. Of course this is all mostly bullshit because it's congress rather than Obama or Clinton or Bush that matters.
Do you live in a dimension where time doesn’t move linearly and 2016 is the year after 2012?? Trend lines are used in economics in this particular dimension in which time moves linearly. And finally, you clearly believe Obama was president in 2008 because -1.1 is 2007!!! You have mashed taters for brains like Biden!!! Lolololololol!!!
CBO forecasts have been off trillions for years. How many times have we heard the jobs numbers off by hundreds of thousands by similar groups. The CBO should have been ended years ago
Eliminate the state and local tax deductions - you want high taxes in your state then fk you. Then implement a federal tax on state and local governments that taxes the tax authorities 30% of any money they collect. I see no reason why the tax man can't tax the tax man. It is a very good untapped source of revenue. It is income for the tax man after all - tax it.
I agree. In Washington State, we have no income tax, but we do have high real estate and other taxes. So I have no sympathy for other blue states whining about their income tax. Which they should all look at lowering.
OK, so Republicans can be (almost) as retarded about the federal budget as Democrats, but in different ways. But in every other domain and issue, Team Blue has a lock on stupid.
I dare you: tell me a thing that Democrats do better, from a libertarian perspective.
No, why would you care about Democratic policies if they hand off a manageable situation to the Republican president?? Trump chose not to reform Obamacare and Bush did rebuild the military…so why do you care what the president elected by the people did before you got the president you voted for??
this guy's posts are completely incomprehensible. Is it a bot?
We must respect the decision of voters. So the only thing you should care about is that at the end of a president’s term they hand off a better situation than they inherited. Clinton obviously did that and Obama obviously did that and Biden obviously did that. Bush and Trump failed to do that. The problem is now Republicans view politics as a hobby and they watch shows that get them worked up on a daily basis when the Constitution provides for a 4 year term.
I'm going with bot
In Kevin Hassett we trust. WTF??
He’s retarded.
Why don’t you check out FRED??
Write it here, Shrike.
Taco trucks and ass sex?
I might have said pot in the past, but they clearly can't be trusted to legalize a plant.
Could you fvcking morons learn the difference between debt and deficit?
No, they can’t.
They know, but just like how they love to dishonestly conflate legal and illegal immigration for the sake of their narratives, they'll do the same with debt and deficit.
The GOP Tax Bill Will Add $2.3 Trillion to the Deficit, CBO Says
So what. Those are just numbers. We've been ignoring numbers since forever. What the new deficits will do is create more days like today. Failed T-bond auction that jacks up interest rates and dumps stock market and all other asset prices. Try this 5-20 times per year. Forever.
Republicans have. Democrats haven’t. Clinton gave us a surplus and Obama got the deficit/GDP ratio to 3% by 2014. So Republicans are the party that took manageable deficits and exploded them. Biden inherited an insane deficit/GDP ratio and would have had it to 3% by 2026.
Too bad he died years ago
The cost to service the debt will become unmanageable. It is pretty bad now. Also it is wrong to undertax ourselves and dump the bill on future generations.
You’ve never given a shit about deficits or debt Tony. And we don’t have a revenue problem. We have a spending problem. And it’s your fault.
Also it is wrong to undertax ourselves and dump the bill on future generations.
NO!
It was wrong to spend the future's money like drunken sailors on transgender comics in Bolivia, feminist art in Kabul, and abortions for Malaysians, Tony.
Not one of those extra tax dollars collected would have gone to paying down the debt, and every red cent of it would have gone to funding even more of your crazy bullshit.
Cutting taxes means you can't waste their money further, and will have to invent your funds for tampons in boys washrooms out of thin air again instead.