Republican Reconciliation Package Will Lead to $3 Trillion Annual Deficits
A new analysis from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates that the national debt will equal nearly 130 percent of GDP by 2034.

The reconciliation package taking shape in the House will add at least $3.3 trillion to the debt through 2034, according to a new analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB). And if various "temporary" tax cuts are made permanent, the debt will increase by $5.2 trillion, it says.
The GOP reconciliation package's mix of tax cuts and spending increases for defense, homeland security, and federal law enforcement would add $4.1 trillion to the deficit. This would be offset by $1.5 trillion in various savings and spending cuts.
Deficits would spike in 2027 under the bill, rising by $600 billion over 2024's $1.8 trillion. After that, tax cuts—including carve-outs on tipped wages and interest on auto loans—would start to expire, and pay-fors would kick in, causing the costs of the bill to fall.
But if those tax cuts are not allowed to expire, and other spending hikes are made permanent, the CRFB estimates that the bill will increase yearly deficits by $700 billion by 2034.
Either way, the country is looking at annual budget deficits of $2.9 trillion and $3.3 trillion by the middle of the next decade.
The national debt would equal somewhere between 124 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) and 129 percent of GDP by 2034. That's above the 117 percent debt-to-GDP ratio that would result if Congress let the 2017 tax cuts expire on schedule and kept spending levels constant.
All scenarios envision a massive, unprecedented peacetime debt burden.
"By 2027, under the reconciliation bill, debt would exceed the previous record of 106 percent of GDP set just after World War II," reads the CRFB analysis.
In a separate analysis released yesterday, the Tax Foundation projects that the heavy debt burden of the bill would be a significant drag on economic growth.
"American incomes measured by Gross National Product (GNP) would increase by less than 0.05 percent because the deficit impact of the bill drives a wedge between the increase in economic output and the increase in American incomes," reads the Tax Foundation report.
"With debt projected to exceed its historic record and interest costs already consuming a growing share of the budget, adding trillions to the debt through reconciliation would further weaken our fiscal position and constrain future economic growth," concludes the CFPB analysis.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You seem to be confused about the differences between annual deficits and total debt.
Uhhh, buddy, the package is for this year only. What's the "through 2034" for?
Which either way? With ($5.2T) or without ($3.3T) the tax cuts?
What a mess, both the budgets and the reporting.
The reporting is basically reading from CRFB analysis. The reporter is just the messenger. I know you're trying to make up for the hatred you receive for being economically literate by attacking Reason authors, but your attack is misplaced. And it's not enough for the Trump defending economic ignoramuses to like you.
So Britches is just a spokesman for CRFB.
SGT isn't going to be your friend Sarcasmic, just because he hates tariffs and you use them to troll. Keep sucking up to Jeff instead.
What is the word 'annual' doing in the title?
The $3.3T (or $5.2T) is not ANNUAL, it is CUMULATIVE over 9 years (thru 2034).
That means projected ANNUAL deficits will, on average, be under a half-trillion dollar per year.
Of course, the stupidity of trying to predict annual deficits over the course of Trumps current four year term, his successors first four year term, and either their successors first year or the first year of Trump's successor's second term is just ignored.
Biden's FY 2024 annual budget deficit was $1.8T
Biden's FY 2023 annual budget deficit was $1.7T
So Biden had $3.5T in added deficit spending in just TWO years, this budget predicts $3.3T or $5.2T deficit over the next NINE years, that's better, right?
I know math and reading are very hard for you, but the numbers are IN ADDITION to current deficits. From the article:
- the CRFB estimates that the bill will increase yearly deficits by $700 billion by 2034 [in addition to the current $1.8T].
- the country is looking at annual budget deficits of $2.9 trillion and $3.3 trillion by the middle of the next decade [up from $1.8T now].
Told you the federal budget was going to increase every year while Trump is president. Cut the government? Yeah right.
I thought you weren't pro raising income taxes. Make up your fucking mind. That's what the deficit rise is from.
They are also using the standard false assumptions and estimates lol.
It's still Trump's budget, and it increases deficits and doesn't reduce the debt. You blame Biden for his increased deficits, yet you forgive Trump.
Make up your fucking mind.
I keep forgetting congress has zero role in passing budgets. Thank you for reminding me.
Please cite my blame.
Just like sarc I'll give you the quick and dirty.
Veto proof bill - blame congress.
Vetoable bill - blame both.
I do enjoy watching you retards think 100 years of budgetary largesse can be undone in a single year. While your allies like sarc raged against every doge audit or attempt to cut spending. Ignores other reform bills separate such as food assistance programs.
Meanwhile the overall spending in the bill is a reduction from last year. 1 area of increase is dod, but overall a cut. It contains a clause to make recission easier (again see DOGE) which doesn't show the cuts. It doesn't account for the recission bill already at congress.
So what you've now decided to do is... clap for raising income taxes while you've spent months raging at MUCH smaller tariffs (16B last month)
So let's review.
You rage against 16B in consumpyion taxes yet here demand over 100B a month in raising income taxes.
Help me make this make sense.
Won't even point out to you that libertarians have long preferred consumption taxes to income taxes.
And then ignore the now 12T in promised investments.
Ignore the scorers used a much lower than assumed gdp/tax revenue growth.
Ignore these groups have always been wrong. You have a nonsensical argument and you wont relent.
Did you read just the summary or have you dug into the bill?
I will take the small win instead of the constant loss. You seem to prefer the latter.
Lol.
Sarc would see this country completely collapse if it meant mankind Trump look bad. Same with all the other democrats here.
I do enjoy watching you retards think 100 years of budgetary largesse can be undone in a single year.
Trump: I can eliminate the national debt in 8 years
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-turmoil-or-triumph-donald-trump-stands-alone/2016/04/02/8c0619b6-f8d6-11e5-a3ce-f06b5ba21f33_story.html?postshare=5311459637938733
Sure, Trump didn't say he could do it in a single year. I guess that makes Trump a mini-retard?
Veto proof bill - blame congress.
Vetoable bill - blame both.
If the president truly thinks the bill deserves to be vetoed, what an *actual* "master negotiator" does, is to veto the bill and then negotiate with the handful of members of Congress who would be most likely to flip their votes and sustain the veto in a veto override vote. But Trump is neither a master negotiator, nor did he actually think that the Covid spending bills deserved to be vetoed, because he was in favor of them all along.
There is an argument to be made to blame Congress more than the president when they disagree but Congress' majority is large enough to sustain a veto. But there is no argument to be made to blame Congress and NOT blame the president when they BOTH AGREE, regardless of the size of the Congressional majority.
And then ignore the now 12T in promised investments.
lol that's pretty funny. Here is an article about those "investments":
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/11/fact-checking-trumps-claim-of-securing-10-trillion-in-investments-for-us
Bottom line:
Trump is attempting to take credit for investment decisions made before 2025, for investment decisions that had nothing to do with his policies, and for investment decisions that were actually in response to Trump's harmful tariffs, like decisions to stock up on inventory before tariffs went into effect. So the actual figure is something closer to $2 trillion. So the additional investment is less than the $3 trillion deficit that this new budget will create. Brilliant!
Trump owns the Republican party, like literally. His family runs it. Every single member of it is there specifically to do his bidding and openly campaigns to that effect. He spent six years aggressively primarying every member of the party who wouldn't drop to their knees and suck him off on the White House Lawn at the drop of a hat. He has purged every federal agency of those not sufficiently loyal to him. He has personally appointed most of the conservative justices in the SC and they've given him a carte blanche to do literally whatever he wants, up to an including spending unlimited amounts of printable money on whatever he wants.
He owns all three branches of government, personally. To say that congress is independent is completely delusional. They are doing exactly what he wants and anything they do is 100% on him. You don't get to have all the power without having all the responsibility.
n00bdragon OWNS TDS. n00bdragon is a slimy pile of TDS-addled shit who should fuck off and die to make his family proud.
Get reamed with a barb-wire-wrapped broom stick, asshole.
It DOES NOT increase deficits at all, it lowers them considerably from 1.7T 2023 and 1.9T 2024 to 3.3 over 8 years.
You put a 400lber on a diet, they don’t get to 200lbs the first week. But if they are at 350after a month or two, that’s a phenomenal success
Trump inherited 3% deficit/GDP and cut taxes which increased the deficit…Trump could get back to 3% but it would require 39.6% top income tax rate and ending his trade wars because Powell needs to reduce rates to decrease interest on the deficit.
Ha! Trump will pay off the national debt (AND the world-wide debt, AND the galactic debt, the inter-galactic debt, AND the UNIVERSAL COSMIC debt), ALL through a 3,865,928% tariff to be paid by the slant-eyed yellow-skinned demons known ass the "Chinese"!
Thus Spake THE Unspankable White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt!!!
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2025/are-tariffs-tax-cuts/
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says tariffs are ‘a tax cut.’ Economists say they aren’t
A SPANKING, a SPANKING, clamored the Karoline Leavitt-enamored Trumpanzees!!! Take shit, shake shit, bake shit, but do SNOT forsake OUR shit or break OUR shit, Karoline Leavitt-Alone-PLEASE before Ye BREAK OUR shit irrevocably, Ye SOUR Breaker of ALL shit!!! Our shit v/s SOUR shit; which side are Ye ON?!?!?
"The hottest spots in Hell are reserved for those, who, in a moment of crisis, REFUSE to pick a side!!!"
SBF inherited one brain cell and has found no others. Fuck off and die, asshole.
Did you ever hear how Mother Pence saved Mike’s life? Apparently one day Mother walked in on Mike watching Magnum PI and engaging in unnatural behavior!! She quickly grasped his sticky hand and they both started praying…and they prayed those evil thoughts right out of his head!! Prayer works and that day Mike was saved from catching a very nasty virus by taking a mustache ride in West Hollywood!
Did Mother Pence also save Mike’s life from Trump and Trumpanzees Gone Apeshit, chanting "Hang Mike Pence" and putting up makeshit gallows? If so, HOW did She do this? Also through prayer? HOW does this whole thing WORK? Can we pray to HER that SHE should use HER prayers to get DJT to STOP being such an evil idiot?
The last time we had a surplus was 2001, every administration since then increased the national debt - what's your point?
BTW, we still have TRILLIONS in additional deficit spending from Biden Admin - remember, all this COVID Emergency programs for schools, governments, etc that were to go for 10 years? The money hasn't been clawed back - yet.
Trump: " This is Biden's fault. "
Isn't it? At least to an 80%+ (very considerate) margin.
Who just kept on making one spending plan after the next?
No no. Trump like his first term is responsible for the increasing interest from debt from all prior spending as well as the spending increases in law. Fully to blame. Ask STG. He wants this all done in a budget bill. He hopes you're as ignorant as he in to realize reforms to Medicaid, SS, and others bills are very limited in what can be changed in a budget bill. So he will blame Trump for not being able to illegally end entitlements in the budget bill.
Trump is a tyrant for using his executive powers to try and stop extraneous and fraudulent democrat spending. Trump is also to blame for not exceeding his executive authority and restructuring nom discretionary spending. Blamed for this by the same people who will fight tooth and nail to prevent him from cutting a penny from the budget.
I can’t think of a single reason to allow their existence to continue.
Trump like his first term is responsible for the increasing interest from debt from all prior spending
Congratulations, you picked the one category of spending that Trump truly isn't responsible for.
as well as the spending increases in law.
Well according to you, Trump does have the power to impound spending. So by your standard, yeah, Trump is responsible for not impounding enough spending. Right?
How is it not? Biden’s handlers did everything they could to sabotage Trump on the way in, and all you other democrat acolytes are working round the clock to stop Trump from doing anything good. Then you attack him for not doing more.
Be glad I’m not in charge. I’m not as nice as Trump. I would exterminate you all like an infestation.
For those wondering who makes up this committee here is their board members.
https://www.crfb.org/board-members
Basically a bunch of people who when they had the opportunity to do something about the budget failed miserably. I value their opinions on this about the same as what I just flushed down the toilet.
Lol. This makes my response to sarc above about Britches being their spokesman even funnier. That’s quite the list of assholes to be citing.
Nothing has shown to be more accurate than economic predictions.
Thank you. Trusting the experts is the libertarian way.
Reverence for TOP MEN is the libertarian way.
Say hello to 10% mortgage rates
Hope so. It will be a good time to snap up some cheap rental property with cash.
Will you blame the Jews?
I must confess to some hope that Trump, being so contrary, and the Republican congress critters being so "we gotta drain the swamp and put our fiscal house in order", that somehow, someway, we could pass a balanced budget, let alone one that actually paid a little debt off. Foolish me.
We will never get back to a balanced budget like Clinton had and Bush could have easily had because boomers started turning 65 in 2011. The goal is 3% deficit/GDP ratio and Obama had that and Trump inherited that and Biden would have had it by 2026 when the top rate reverted back to 39.6%. Trump blew up the deficit even before Covid to 4.5% and so I very seriously doubt he will get to 3% this time.
"We will never get back to a balanced budget like Clinton had..."
Steaming piles of lefty shit repeat this lie as if repeating it often enough will make it true.
It WON'T, slimy pile of lefty shit. Fuck off and die.
The majority of the budget can't actually be touched solely through a 50% budgetary vote.
To make large changes to thinks like Medicare and medicaid, it can't be done through reconciliation (majority vote) but solely through normal procedure, which with 48 democrats in senate won't happen.
A libertarian magazine that was informed would know this.
As would a libertarian magazine that is honest.
Our choices, lacking 60 senators and a solid majority of house members that are serious about spending cuts, are this reconciliation bill or no bill.
Perhaps Reason would serve us better by pointing out the lack of fiscally sane people in congress - especially in solid blue districts.
Reason libertarians: Tariffs are taxes! OMG Save Our Cheap Toasters and Dildos!
Reason libertarians: Ya know income taxes are kinda cool. You can always buy toasters and dildos with that fat refund.
It just continues to amaze me the just complete ignorance on this point.
Gears Grimy and Udderly STRIPPED: Tariffs are SNOT paid by Good American Cuntsumers!!! They are paid by the Heathen Yellow-Skinned Chinee BASTARDS and by the Dastardly Lizard People!!! Onwards and Upwards, Oppressed White Male Dudes of AmeriKKKa!!! MORE TARIFF-TAXES WILL MAKE US ALL RICH!!! Dear Orange Leader TOLD us so!!! Has Dear Orange Leader EVER lied to us?!?!?
Is there a good reason that bringing a plate of food to a table should escape taxation but , say, caring for a sick person or operating a lathe shouldn't?
All that matters is that the Heathen Chinee and udder Un-Americans should PAY our tariff-taxes, damn-shit-all!!!
(Vast wealth should flow to ALL of the Good Americans, via taxing foreigners!!!)
Learn to serve.
Yes, there are more waiters and waitresses than there are home caregivers, and the waitstaff votes.
What's the debt percentage at which everything collapses?
Whatever percentage spooks people who buy bonds. When that happens, and it will happen, the federal government won't be able to finance any more debt. That's when it will get really interesting. And quite likely violent.
Under Reagan everyone could see they cut taxes too much and so they quickly increased them. When they cut taxes too much under Bush/Cheney they just didn’t care.
SBF lives an active fantasy life.
Which is to say SBF is a pathological lying pile of lefty shit.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
I'd still like to launch Mike Johnson out of a trebuchet, for the record.
The fact everyone knows he is a clown is his best feature…no Republicans wanted another Republican to be honored with the Speakership and so they gave it to the one individual nobody respects.
Making it obvious that you are a steaming pile of lying lefty shit is your best feature.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
In times when expenses exceed revenue, reducing taxes without reducing spending is not a proper tax cut, it is a tax deferral. It defers the eventual tax burden (with interest!) to the future, for future taxpayers at higher future rates. It's not just and it's not fair, they don't get a vote in the tax burden that the government now places upon them.
You're so libertarian.
Fuck you, cut spending!
No, not that spending!!!1!1!1!1!
Uh huh. And where does paying for manhattan hotel rooms for illegals fit into your deferral theory? “Shut up bigot, and commit your kids and grandkids to paying for these illegals welfare!”
You’re very generous with other people’s money, Jeff.
And if various "temporary" tax cuts are made permanent, the debt will increase by $5.2 trillion, it says."
This week's concern troll trifecta:
Cutting taxes is wrong because we're in debt. DOGE hasn't cut a trillion yet and they already had three whole months so why even try. Foreign spending is soft power.
You left out "Orangemanbad"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Orange Man bad?!? He BAD, all right! He SOOO BAD, He be GOOD! He be GREAT! He Make America Great Again!
We KNOW He can Make America Great Again, because, as a bad-ass businessman, He Made Himself and His Family Great Again! He Pussy Grabber in Chief!
See The Atlantic article https://feedreader.com/observe/theatlantic.com/politics%252Farchive%252F2016%252F10%252Fdonald-trump-scandals%252F474726%252F%253Futm_source%253Dfeed/+view
“The Many Scandals of Donald Trump: A Cheat Sheet” or this one…
https://reason.com/2019/09/02/republicans-choose-trumpism-over-property-rights-and-the-rule-of-law/
He pussy-grab His creditors in 6 bankruptcies, His illegal sub-human workers ripped off of pay on His building projects, and His “students” in His fake Get-Rich-like-Me realty schools, and so on. So, He has a GREAT record of ripping others off! So SURELY He can rip off other nations, other ethnic groups, etc., in trade wars and border wars, for the benefit of ALL of us!!!
All Hail to THE Pussy Grabber in Chief!!!
Most of all, HAIL the Chief, for having revoked karma! What comes around, will no longer go around!!! The Donald has figured out that all of the un-Americans are SOOO stupid, that we can pussy-grab them all day, every day, and they will NEVER think of pussy-grabbing us right back!
Orange Man Bad-Ass Pussy-Grabber all right!
We CAN grab all the pussy, all the time, and NONE will be smart enough to EVER grab our pussies right back!
These voters simply cannot or will not recognize the central illusion of politics… You can pussy-grab all of the people some of the time, and you can pussy-grab some of the people all of the time, but you cannot pussy-grab all of the people all of the time! Sooner or later, karma catches up, and the others will pussy-grab you right back!
And if various "temporary" tax cuts are made permanent, the debt will increase by $5.2 trillion, it says.
These 'temporary' cuts have been in place for 8 years now.
This assumes all spending will remain the same.
It is time for doing it differently. Why not promote the cuts in spending?
“And if various "temporary" tax cuts are made permanent, the debt will increase by $5.2 trillion, it says."
It can say that all it wants, it doesn’t make it true.
(Hint: Revenue goes up every year unless there’s a recession or the world loses its goddamn mind and shuts down for 6-9 months. Cite: https://www.statista.com/statistics/200405/receipts-of-the-us-government-since-fiscal-year-2000/)
I'll say it again: nothing is going to be done about our runaway deficits and debt. Our government institutions do not have the ability to significantly cut spending—there is no viable process for doing so. We are doomed. Stock your bunker now, or be prepared to check out when the food riots start.
Fear mongering. The package isn't even out yet so there is no telling what the final plan will look like. Dems running around screaming about the debt are the same ones running around screaming about DOGE cutting government waste and fraud.
Ah, yes. More static evaluation of tax reforms, which always miss out on the dynamic growth that occurs. You can tell this by how they still claim that keeping the 2017 tax cuts will "raise the deficit and debt", even though in reality, they resulted in increased revenues.
Static evaluations only look at how much tax revenue would add to the deficit, assuming that nothing else changes because of them. But every adult understands that people and businesses react to changes in the tax codes. When Reagan reduced the top rates, revenues from those top brackets increased.
Personally, I'd like to see tax rates set somewhere between the Maximum Revenue rate and the Maximum Economic Growth rate on the Laffer Curves.
Oh, and increasing the SALT deduction that was capped in the 2017 Tax Reform means decreasing revenues and subsidizing high-tax states. I oppose doing that.
I'm disappointed that Reason appears to be factoring in the supposed "cost" of tax cuts into these numbers. Per Duverger's Law, federal tax revenue floats around 19%, no matter the particulars of the tax code, so claiming that tax cuts will increase deficits and debt ignores reality.
Except of course, that you don't know ANY of this, because the stimulus effect of the Laffer Curve response is not factored, the means by which government statistics are calculated are statically scored, rather than dynamically, there's never anything but an oblivious treatment of new initiatives that stand to produce - LIKE THEY DID THE LAST TIME - greater prosperity, nor the wild card of the extent to which the public has become inured to the Chicken Little weeping and gnashing of teeth that is the media and Democrat party lingua franca to convince their herds that the world is ending so they will get in line to re-elect them. You would hope that at this point - especially after the criminal Biden coverup - that people would ignore the Dems as liars and their wailing as the self-serving claptrap it is and behave normally - but it's an unknown. And that affects public sentiment, which in turn is an enormous influence on behavior and economic activities of all sorts. Trump's ability to push a hopeful and positive agenda is gaining strength as the things he promises are coming true. There's NO way to predict what the demise of the phony media in the public mind will produce. So we should just shut up about it.