Americans Doubt Trump's Trade War Will Benefit Them
Consumers and businesses are already experiencing higher prices and economic pain.

How are the Trump administration's trade negotiations doing at the moment? Not well, it appears. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warns that China could lose 10 million jobs if it doesn't lower tariffs—which means the standoff with that country's government continues. Canada just elected a prime minister who wants to pretend that his North American country and its economy are part of Europe (it only is in a shared disdain for free speech). And Americans are, frankly, unconvinced that the U.S. president's antifreedom protectionism will do anything but make them poorer.
A Skeptical Majority
"Americans are widely skeptical about the benefits of the recent tariffs the Trump administration has imposed on the United States' trading partners, with majorities believing they will ultimately cost the U.S. more money than they generate — in the short term (70%) as well as the long run (62%)," reports Gallup of the results of recent polling.
Importantly, 89 percent of respondents think higher tariffs are very (66 percent) or somewhat (23 percent) likely to raise consumer prices. Majorities of those surveyed from both major parties agree on that point. That's a huge deal after the disruptive inflation that helped to do in the Biden administration and Democratic presidential hopeful Kamala Harris. Voters who fired one president over policies that sent the cost of living soaring won't be pleased if his successor disappoints them over the same concern.
Besides criticizing Biden and Harris over inflation, Trump also blamed them for letting the manufacturing sector erode. He partially justified high tariffs with the argument that they will revive domestic manufacturing and create jobs.
"The country gained 10,000 manufacturing jobs in President Trump's first full month in office — a swift turnaround after losing an average of 9,000 manufacturing jobs per month, or 111,000 total, in the final year of the Biden Administration," the White House boasted March 7.
But only 49 percent of those surveyed by Gallup agree that the trade war will bring about a rebirth of manufacturing jobs, with 25 percent considering that very likely and 24 percent saying it's somewhat likely. About half say that's either not too likely (32 percent) or not likely at all (18 percent).
Economists Are Even More Doubtful
The public has economists on their side in this dispute.
In a letter opposing protectionist policies that "repeat the catastrophic errors of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff of 1930," over 1,700 signatory economists, as of April 29, caution that "we anticipate that American workers will incur the brunt of these misguided policies in the form of increased prices and the risk of a self-inflicted recession."
Earlier this month, Goldman Sachs predicted that tariffs might create as many as 100,000 manufacturing jobs by raising the cost of goods produced overseas. But those higher costs are expected to reduce overall employment by 500,000 jobs.
Last week, the National Association of Manufacturers warned that domestic producers "are sharing their stories of increased cost pressures and uncertainty." The result has been higher costs for them that will eventually have to be passed on to consumers, and difficulty in planning while prices and markets are so turbulent and unpredictable.
With costs rising because of increasing expenses for components, materials, and packaging used even by domestic manufacturers, many businesses are delaying or canceling plans to invest in new plants and hire workers.
Reduced Hiring and Spending
"Trivium Packaging, a manufacturer of steel and aluminum containers…has shelved any expansion plans in the US for now, and the only hiring happening at its five US plants is to fill in staff losses due to attrition" because of the increased cost of the imported metal on which it relies, according to an April 17 Bloomberg report. Trivium was just one of the companies profiled in the article that "are putting hiring and expansion plans on hold while they come up with short-term plans to cope with the tariffs."
Consumers are also changing their behavior in response to the trade war. Americans initially flocked to buy cars to beat anticipated price hikes. Purchases slowed as the expected price increases materialized, spurring the Trump administration this week to carve out some tariff relief for automakers.
But the same factors driving concerns about prices and availability regarding cars affect every other industry. According to the Federal Reserve's latest Beige Book report on economic conditions, "uncertainty around international trade policy was pervasive" and "non-auto consumer spending was lower overall."
Additionally, "several Districts reported that firms were taking a wait-and-see approach to employment, pausing or slowing hiring until there is more clarity on economic conditions" and "there were scattered reports of firms preparing for layoffs."
Importantly, added the Beige Book analysis, "firms reported adding tariff surcharges or shortening pricing horizons to account for uncertain trade policy. Most businesses expected to pass through additional costs to customers."
Basically, businesses and consumers alike are slowing spending and taking a wait-and-see attitude as they anticipate higher prices and economic disruption from the Trump administration's protectionist policies. Americans expect the tariffs to be painful and they're not happy about it.
Impatient Americans
"Overall, 31% of U.S. adults say they would not accept any economic disruption at all from tariffs, while 68% would put up with at least a few months," Gallup found in its poll. "Those willing to tolerate some unease divide about evenly between accepting a few months (20%), up to a year (22%) or more than a year (26%) of economic pain."
With midterm elections coming up next year, the Trump administration has a limited window of opportunity to demonstrate that its protectionist policies can help Americans instead of hurt them. That's unlikely, since economists believe trade barriers almost always cause harm to the inhabitants of the countries that impose them. Given that most Americans anticipate pain from this trade war, Trump and company better get cracking on those negotiations.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I wish Amazon had gone through with their plan to show how much tariffs have increased prices. They show sales taxes, and the tariff apologists like to call them consumption taxes.
DickTator Donald shit all over Jeff Bezos for even thinking about that!
"Nice little distributorshit ya got going there. Be a shame if something happened to shit. Tit would be MUCH better (for ye) to SNOT tell ANYONE the truth!"
Who knows what threats Trump made, but they must have been doozies.
I bet he was going to have him killed! Or worse!
Jeff Bezos was threatened with being sent to El Salvador torture chambers without a trial. Twat I don't get is HOW Trump could STAND for this out-sourcing?!?! Twat about GOOD jerbs for GOOD American torture-goons and jackbooted jail-thugs?
No, it was going to be a nuclear bomb sent to his house! With nails and broken glass taped to the outside!
Literally Hitler! Literally!!
https://www.axios.com/2025/04/29/prri-poll-most-americans-trump-dangerous-dictator
Exclusive: Most Americans see Trump as "dangerous dictator," poll says
Are they all WRONG? Is Trump's human nature REALLY different than Shitler's human nature was? Some law(s) of physics or some such, says that shit can SNOT happen HERE?
Most Americans? How on earth did he win the election ?
He won the erections by lying to us, and appealing to our STUPID AND HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM!!!
But the stupid and hide-bound Tribalists can't see SHIT, of course, 'cause they are willfully blind!
If'n Ye really DO want to understand (which I doubt), and you have the neural fire-power to read much of anything, some smart people have written explanations (at the instinctual, sociobiological level) of WHY the likes of Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer appeal to our self-righteous and GREEDY tribalism.
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been feared and resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
Instead of KILLING Jesus, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc., we’d be better off VOTING for these kinds of people! But we will NOT, ’cause they Hurt Our Precious Baby Feelings, by giving tribalism and do-gooder derogation the disrespect that they (and we self-righteous tribalists) SOOO thoroughly deserve!
Jeff Bezos was afraid that Trump and His Trumpanzees would add "Hang Jeff Bezos" to their threats of political violence, such ass "Hang Mike Pence" and "Execute General Milley". Jeff Bezos caved, like a coward... Which is too bad, butt pretty much expected. The uber-rich LOVE their uber-riches, FAR more than truth and the welfare of the pubic public and the pubic public republic!
And how many people have been murdered by Trump supporters so far?
So wanton threats of political violence are PervFectly OK by You? Can I shoot 1,000 bullets at you, so long ass they all MISS you?
(I don't know how many have been killed by Trump supporters, butt do the math, see how many murders have happened in the USA in the last better part of a decade, then calculate the percentage of the USA population which support Trump. I bet that there have been a BUTT-TON of murders committed by Trump supporters!)
Agreed, but the administration could not allow the public to know the truth.
My only issue with it was it was going to be an obvious stunt, seeing as there were already tariffs on a wide assortment of goods.
It sounds to me like the other countries are getting hurt worse by it. It's in their best interests to make some deals.
The short term pain is expected. The problem is that most of the public is stupid and being misled by dishonest journalists like Tuccille here. There is no way that he's incapable of understanding the strategy here or how it was likely to play out.
Tariffs are bad. Other countries putting tariffs on our goods is worse for us than us putting tariffa on their goods. The ideal situation is that both sides drop them and we get a little more domestic production as a result. The economy requires actual physical productivity. Dumbfuck propagandists pontificating online are disconnected from the actual economy since all they produce are words.
Strategy my ass. He's floundering, and he will keep floundering until he shows that idiot Navarro the door.
If you think other countries are being hurt worse, you don't understand that tariffs are a tax on Americans.
"Physical productivity" -- what is that, can you define it? If you mean physical manufacturing, you're an even bigger bigot. Services are more important than manufacturing -- delivery, software, management, hotels, retail.
If that's your understanding, you're even more ignorant than Trump.
Yes, because if you're not selling product of course you keep people on. Tariffs hurt both sides but you refuse to see or acknowledge that. But please, go on with your zero time horizon thinking.
Show me where I said tariffs don't hurt both sides.
Quote my exact words.
You can't. You're a liar.
If you think other countries are being hurt worse, you don't understand that tariffs are a tax on Americans.
China is dead in the water.
That's a very useful description ... of a boat. For an economy, it's useless.
Before a play someone told me to break a leg, I immediately started to yell at him that wanting me to break a leg before my performance was a horrid thing to want.
Good analogy, yes, I am glad you agree a boat is not an economy.
It is amazing how some people like him stick to their bumper stickers.
Already reports of massive closures in China, layoffs, etc.
China has been quietly meeting at Treasury, talking about undoing large segments of their tariffs.
But reality is often different from bumper stickers.
https://nypost.com/2025/04/21/business/china-garment-factories-that-supply-shein-shut-down-amid-trump-tariffs/
https://www.ft.com/content/3f81cec8-6d0c-4a11-97d3-2cbe78a5e284
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-30/china-s-factory-activity-contracts-as-trade-war-intensifies
Oh, right. CCP statistics are totally reliable and totally tell the total tale. Yes, "dead in the water" totally describe the Chinese economy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdD2DYk7t54
Yes. Tariffs are a tax on Americans. What does that tax do? It raises the price of imported goods. What happens when prices go up? Demand goes down and fewer of those goods are sold.
So, as the taxed Americans buy fewer of those goods, the exporters in other countries are making fewer sales. Now whether those sellers selling less are worse off than Americans paying more is a different question.
Other countries putting tariffs on our goods is worse for us than us putting tariffa on their goods.
That is simply not true. Tariffs prop up industries that are at a comparative disadvantage and create opportunity cost. Unilateral free trade still generates more wealth than having tariffs.
The ideal situation is that both sides drop them and we get a little more domestic production as a result.
We have domestic production. Know what the second largest exporter in the world is behind China? The US. We produce plenty. You, like so many people, are conflating manufacturing jobs with manufacturing output. Manufacturing employment has been declining due to automation, not offshoring. Robots, not foreigners, are the enemies of domestic manufacturing jobs.
The economy requires actual physical productivity.
Why? Don't services have value?
Dumbfuck propagandists pontificating online are disconnected from the actual economy since all they produce are words.
Dumbfucks who are deliberately and willfully ignorant of economics think they're the wise ones, but in reality they don't know what they're talking about.
You, like so many people, are conflating manufacturing jobs with manufacturing output. Manufacturing employment has been declining due to automation, not offshoring. Robots, not foreigners, are the enemies of domestic manufacturing jobs.
You are correct about manufacturing output, but wrong about the reason. Automation has replaced overpriced UNION members and leftist labor policies like $20 per hour to take orders at McD's. Self checkout is an answer to cashiers demanding more than they are worth.
The laborious shit that cannot be replaced easily by automation is offshored. Mexican labor for the US and Tunisia for Europe.
There is usually more than one reason for any complex phenomenon. Artificially high wages are certainly part of it. So is automation. And the automation is not entirely a result of high union wages. Even in countries with large pools of cheap labor, automation is catching on in industries where it fits well. Yes, there is some labor that is harder to replace with robots, especially when there is cheap labor available. And those jobs will tend to be offshored. But it's still a reasonable question whether protecting those jobs in the US is even desirable overall.
Output also gets a little off as miniaturization becomes more revenant. As an example they count resister or cause as a form of output, which are largely all automated and the numbers are large. If you look at other output metrics like durable goods, it isn't really expanding in the US as much of it was offshore. Then materials output is down due to the left stopping mining and extraction.
Simplu claiming output us up without realizing which metric is referred to shows a lack of understanding.
“Tariffs prop up industries that are at a comparative disadvantage”
Not having to worry about pollution regulations or paying your employees $20/hour does indeed give you an advantage.
“Why? Don't services have value?”
Services have value. Unfortunately the average American thinks your services aren’t worth what you’re charging (royal you) in a lot of instances. And corporations have been offshoring those service jobs (engineers, architects, it, etc.) for decades now.
You can say that U.S. pollution regulations are a bit too strict but I don't want to live in the equivalent of Chinese air and water pollution. I've been to Shenzen. There are quality of life factors worth some pollution regulations. De-regulating to a China level is not worth it.
Tariffs are bad, but can be used to address long term trade imbalances, especially when one side is subsidizing trade or has very lose labor laws. But to use tariffs as short term bargaining chips that change on the whim of one person is mind boggling stupid and destructive.
Also never forget that Trump's reason to blow up global trade was based on a massive misunderstand of basic inport-export economics. And they also pulled the "formula" to calculate tariff rates out of their ass.
Because all the other methods that were tried, (coupled with doing nothing), worked so well!
Given the robust trade and solid economy, it seemed to be working well.
2022: BIDENFLATION IS KILLING AMERICA!!!
2025: Nobody needs cheap Chinese shit anyway.
Both those things are true.
Our PervFectly Arrogant Over-Lards will decide for us all, twat cheap shit we are and are SNOT allowed to buy, at their actual costs!!! (Plus normal profits... The NEW Marxists now say, "All exorbitant profits will now be called 'tariffs', and shit ALL belongs to US!!! This is how WEEEE will become wealthy... And y'all peons can suck hind titty, or, better yet, suck our hemorrhoids!!!"
Those things are not true.
Our PervFectly Arrogant Over-Lards will decide for us all, twat cheap shit we are and are SNOT allowed to buy, at their actual costs!!!
HOW is this SNOT true?
There is very little that anyone actually needs. No one really needs most moderately priced or expensive American made stuff either.
Im the famous Toaster article from Boehm it was very easy to find an American manufactured toaster at the same price as Boehm Chinese toasters.
The cost delta is largely a myth.
There is a slight labor delta, but processes and efficiency gains in American factories often offset that.
There is also the reliability factor. If you could buy Chinese goods for 20% cheaper but they fail 50% more often, are you actually saving anything?
This^
This is all made-up bullshit. THe students I teach would kiss Trump for what he's doing. And you are getting lazier and lazier.
Is it a fact or not ?
Each year, many of the 438 federal agencies—nominally under the president’s control through the executive branch—publish tens of thousands of pages in regulations, red tape that increases the costs of business, transportation, and many other factors Americans often don’t consider.
You don't even read the Libertarian Public Choice theorists even the anti-religion ones like James Buchanan WHO SAID
It is in no typical person's interest to care or do anything about hte thousands who take $10 here and $10 there.
And now I see you could give a shit. Much easier trendier and girlish to go with "boo on tariffs" Really, GROW UP
Just take housing , okay
"a NAHB study found that “25.0 percent of the price of an average single-family home built for sale is attributable to regulation imposed by all units of government at various points along the development/construction process.”"
That's more than any tariffs bite in the asss. Go after some real villains
Regulations make stuff more expensive, so making stuff even more expensive with tariffs is ok? That's just dumb.
Tariffs ARE regulations! REAL normal people understand this! They are now understanding shit even MORE, ass costs skyrocket!
And if you REALLY think that we'll see ANY significunt tax cuts ass a trade-off for the tariff-taxes... I have some PRIME real estate in Florid-Duh to sell to you!
You want to reduce regulations and government meddling by adding taxes.
Consistency is not thy middle name.
We're you born retarded or did you work on it? He's pointing out that the regulations add more to the price than the terrifs ever will. But you and reason don't care about that because tds
He has no statistics to back that up, no data, no references, no nothing. Feelz and emotions and TDS are no substitute.
I like what you saying and would like to sign up for your newsletter
Reason largely ignores the regulatory costs as it hurts their defense of unilateral trade.
Trumpies largely ignore tariff costs as it hurts their defense of Trump.
Do you really think tariffs don't add regulatory costs? Are you really that blind to their corruption?
Read this, it's short and won't strain your brain: https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/protectionism-is-more-idiotic-than-it-looks/
The only way to get Jesse to change his mind would be for Trump to change his mind. If tomorrow Trump had an epiphany and realized that unilateral free trade is better than tariffs, Jesse would suddenly claim he's always been a critic of tariffs and a supporter of unilateral free trade.
Like other Trump hating media propagandists, Tuccille deceitfully cites push polls that were conducted by the same Trump haters whose bogus push polls found (during the past decade) that most Americans:
- would vote for Clinton over Trump in 2016,
- supported the deceitful and violent George Floyd BLM race riots,
- supported Fauci's/Democrat's disastrous covid lockdowns,
- supported Fauci's/Democrat's harmful covid vaccine mandates,
- supported Biden's insistence that US backed Ukraine would defeat Putin, and
- supported carbon bans and massive taxpayer subsidization of ineffective/inefficient wind power, solar power and EVs.
No objective or rational person trusts left wing push polls or the left wing media propagandists who promote their lies.
These same criminally minded Americans thought voting themselves an 85% domestic manufacturing tax, a $36T debt, and 'victim' hatred (justifying their armed-theft) to shut-down American manufacturing was somehow going to benefit them too....
Excuse me if I say I don't give a flying F what Americans (Gimmie, Gimmie, Gimmie) want anymore until Americans want some Individual Liberty and Justice for all.
Yah, because trade controls and centrally planned industrial policy are the epitome of individual liberty.
Tax-Cuts and De-Regulation.................
Or does the USA just not even count as a nation anymore?
Trumps "trade controls" and "import tax" (which =/= centrally planned industry policy) resides entirely in a FOREIGNERS FIRST narrative.
Using tariffs to artificially increase the price of imports in order to prop up domestic industries that cannot otherwise compete is by definition planned industrial policy.
Using domestic manufacturing taxes and a lobby to shut-down domestic manufacturing to artificially increase the price of domestic goods in order to prop up foreign industries that cannot otherwise compete (due to shipping) is by definition planned industrial policy.
Now which statement is BY-FAR more true of the current situation?
Yours or mine?
Typical leftard self-projection. Blaming exactly what they've done on everything/everyone else.
Every day I'm amazed that you manage to say something even more stupid than the day before.
Here's a few facts that you will no doubt deny.
The US is second only to China in goods exported.
Manufacturing output in the US has never been higher.
While manufacturing output has never been higher, manufacturing employment is indeed down. But it's mostly due to automation, not offshoring.
Taxes did not destroy manufacturing, because manufacturing has not been destroyed.
And for many things it is indeed cheaper to buy stuff that was made somewhere else and shipped here than it is to produce it here.
Those are facts, not opinions. They are facts that can easily be verified.
Here's another fact. You are so proud of your stupidity and willful ignorance that you will not only deny the facts that I have presented, but you will refuse to look them up because if you did you'd see that you are wrong. Same reason why you refuse to educate yourself in economics.
You would rather be wrong than learn.
Your 'facts' do not address the WHY manufacturing + shipping 1/2 way around the world is cheaper than just manufacturing next-door.
Your 'facts' are nothing but statements of accepted ignorance / status-quo.
And your personal attacks and your ignorance-accepted self-proclaimed 'facts' don't answer the question ... Which statement is more true ... because you know how stupid it would be to say yours is more true in the current situation.
TDS is a [WE] Identify-as gangster RULES disease. You'll never be able to THINK until you get past that.
Your 'facts' are nothing but statements of accepted ignorance / status-quo.
So you didn't look any of it up. Like I said, you'd rather be wrong than learn something. Way to project, bucko.
You'll never be able to THINK until you get past that.
Says the guy who is proud of his willful ignorance.
LEARN ............ How more shipping makes stuff cheaper? /s
When (if ever) do you question what you are being learnt?
Your problem is... You don't THINK... you just get learnt.
If it costs $100 to make a widget here, and it costs $10 to make a widget there, then as long as shipping is less than $90 it's cheaper to import it.
You might understand that if you weren't willfully ignorant of math because you think numbers are leftist.
And back to accepting the status-quo without asking WHY.....
WHY would it cost $100 to make here and $10 there?
Spouting numbers blindly without the "why those numbers are" is what makes those numbers leftist. Do you think those numbers are racist is why or what?
THINK man. THINK for once in your life.
"Your 'facts' do not address the WHY manufacturing + shipping 1/2 way around the world is cheaper than just manufacturing next-door."
Gotta mention here:
Labor costs, regulations, US subsidies for favored industries and labor make (container, ocean) shipping dirt cheap by comparison. Just getting rid of the stevedores lowered shipping costs tremendously; the 'shrinkage' across the dock was an accounting entry for, Pete's sake!
Used to have lunch at a "Tugboat Annie's" on 3rd; once asked what the special was. Annie said she hadn't heard what the stevedores had stolen yet. Containers are packed at the shippers and unloaded at the receiver, NOT on the docks.
Even goods from Germany (not a low-labor cost economy) are competitive with US manufactures as a result.
TJJ’s point, I think, is that they’re not able to compete due to all of the burdensome regulations, bureaucracy, and wage laws placed on them by the same people who are bitching about tariffs (politician wise).
Do foreign nations have burdensome regulations, bureaucracy, and wage laws, or is that uniquely American?
My problem with TJ is that he has said that he will absolutely not learn economics because if he did he might agree with leftists. He refuses to accept facts because those facts are repeated by leftists. He even refuses to learn math because he feels it is leftist. The guy is willfully and deliberately ignorant of knowledge and facts, and he considers that to be a strength. That's my problem with him.
Some do, for sure (EU countries mostly I would imagine). China and India, etc. obviously do not.
FWIW, that’s where I think we should be focusing and while I don’t think we’ll ever see eye to eye on tariffs, I get where you and SGT are coming from.
Thus the USA was founded to have the power to 'balance' foreign nation markets with it's own ... because the USA has no authority what "burdensome regulations, bureaucracy, and wage laws" foreign nations carry.
I'll never learn from you sarcasmic ... because you don't THINK.
You just want to indoctrinate me with your leftist BS.
You think spot-on correctly.
Only leaving out the massive debt / bankruptcy the USA faces "by the same people who are bitching about tariffs".
How to get ?free? ponies seems to be all the leftards care about.
Thus they're of the "conquer and consume" mentality (i.e. THEFT minds).
Instead of the "create and earn" mentality.
Article Summary:
36% of Americans think 45% of other Americans shouldn't have their opinions measured. They're probably right. If 1500 economists stand on a toothpick can they still find something productive to say?
Crony A - Aaargh!!! Crony B - Rumpelstiltskin!!!
Free trade!! Open borders!! Free trade !! Open borders!!
Trump is a poo-poo head. I'm a little tea pot short and stout. Here is my handle. Here is my spout.
The only thing missing was links to the NYT and WaPo. But then, I really didn't look either
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warns that China could lose 10 million jobs if it doesn't lower tariffs—which means the standoff with that country's government continues.
Good. An internal revolt would completely destabilize China, and that's the best possible thing that could happen there.
Canada just elected a prime minister who wants to pretend that his North American country and its economy are part of Europe
No, they just elected the governor of America's 2nd most left-wing state after California.
And Americans are, frankly, unconvinced that the U.S. president's antifreedom protectionism will do anything but make them poorer.
Nah, we'll be fine. The people being asked are Bluesky knuckle-dragging retards who genuinely believe the sky is falling unless we sacrifice more babies in the temple halls of planned parenthood, start eating lab-grown/bug "meat", and return to the Stone Age.
The public has economists on their side in this dispute.
That's like having media narrativists and The Science and career politicians on your side.
Nobody trusts them anymore, and you weaken your position by pretending it gives your idiotic beliefs any credibility.
"Overall, 31% of U.S. adults say they would not accept any economic disruption at all
"Adults." lol.
As they literally announce their upcoming tantrum.
The tariff shit will soon hit the fan. Port of Seattle is empty and the Port of LA is almost empty. Trade has been brought to a stand still. When our pre-tariff stockpiles run out things will get bad.
Yup. And when that happens, the same people who railed against Bidenflation and COVID shortages will praise Trump, praise high prices, praise shortages, and they will mock, belittle, and otherwise attack anyone who complains.
So it’s working you say?
...because of course; only foreigners can make stuff!!! /s
Stuff gets made where the workers and the factories are. And that is not in the US for most products.
So you see the problem. Do you acknowledge it as a problem?
Or do you think foreign workers and factories are just going to keep creating everything for nothing in return but broken IOU promises?
And once they realize it's no longer being purchased/shipped, they'll be far worse off than any American will be.
At which point they'll likely have an uprising against their communist slave masters.
"The tariff shit will soon hit the fan. Port of Seattle is empty and the Port of LA is almost empty. Trade has been brought to a stand still."
Call the wahambulance! Molly is having a seizure!
“Americans Doubt Trump's Trade War Will Benefit Them”
Im shocked, shocked!, that after 4 months of constant doomsaying and hysteria the people that they polled were doubtful.
That’s like polling people that mostly consume Fox and writing a headline “Americans think Trump has completely knocked it out of the park in his first 100 days.”
Where the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle.
The truth almost never lies in the middle. The purpose of polls is to CREATE a bogus 'middle' by the way the question is framed.
And JFucked is a lying pile of lefty shit.
wrong place