Is REAL ID Actually Happening?
The law was passed 20 years ago, and enforcement finally looms.

Twenty years after it was passed, the REAL ID Act may finally be enforced. However, the decades between the law's passage and its enforcement show that, as a terrorism-prevention measure, it is hardly needed in the first place. Making matters worse, as more than a dozen states are less than 50 percent compliant, the law may make domestic air travel more difficult—or even impossible—for millions of Americans.
The REAL ID Act was passed in 2005 as part of a suite of post-9/11 laws aimed at boosting national security. The law was intended to make it harder to forge identity documents, requiring those seeking a driver's license or ID card to provide additional documentation proving their identity—like a valid passport or birth certificate—with compliant IDs having a star printed on them.
Over the past two decades, enforcement of the law has been delayed a whopping seven times. Most recently, the Biden administration delayed enforcement for two years, from May 3, 2023, to May 7, 2025. So far, no additional delay has been announced by Trump administration officials, but if 20 years of kicking REAL ID enforcement down the can is any indication, it's that an 11th-hour enforcement delay can hardly be ruled out.
These delays have frequently been justified by citing low compliance. In a press release announcing the 2023 delay, one official boasted that it would "give states needed time to ensure their residents can obtain a REAL ID-compliant license or identification card." However, this latest two-year extension hasn't led to widespread adoption.
According to a recent analysis from CBS News, data from earlier this month indicate that at least 17 states are less than 50 percent compliant with the law. In New Jersey, the state with the lowest compliance, just 17 percent of IDs are REAL ID–compliant. CBS reported that around 80 percent of recent domestic air travelers are showing up with a REAL ID, or an additional document, like a passport, that would allow them to travel after the law is enforced.
One reason why so many Americans don't have REAL ID–compliant identification is that many states have pushed back against the law, citing fears over creating a national registry of ID holders. For example, acceptable IDs weren't even issued in all 50 states until 2020—a staggering 15 years after the law was passed. "Some deny it, but REAL ID is emphatically a national ID. It is national in scope, knitting together diverse state systems into a system uniform with respect to its data elements and behind-the-scenes information sharing," wrote Jim Harper, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, in 2022.
In the service of preventing supposed terroristic threats—never mind that a REAL ID can presumably be forged like any other identity document—REAL ID requires Americans to allow their private information to be entered into linked state databases. As J.D. Tuccille pointed out for Reason in 2019, "Those linked databases contain the amassed, hacker-bait details of millions of identification documents necessary for air travel and access to government facilities."
Considerable privacy concerns aside, REAL ID doesn't even seem necessary. The country has been safe from catastrophic terrorism since the 9/11 attacks without the help of Real IDs. The law's enforcement 20 years after its passage would trade privacy for an, at best, hypothetical gain in safety.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The holdout states should tell the TSA to pack up and get the fuck out of their states.
Then the airlines and other transportation companies would heavily lobby against Real ID, probably successfully.
Thank the OPEN BORDERS crowd for that one.
Something, something about Texas [R] trying to enforce the national border because [D] wouldn't and actually tried to STOP Texas from doing it.
It's outrageous enough to be required by law to identify yourself to be able to travel domestically on a plan or even on busses and trains in many cases. I can imagine airlines might want to know who is on their planes, but it shouldn't be required by law.
Ships and ferries, too.
So glad that we won the cold war so that we don't have to present an internal passport to move around our country like they did in the Soviet Union. /sarc
Good one!
If Kyle Rittenhouse had been forced to show ID at an internal checkpoint less than 10 mi. from his house, it would've been easier to remind him that he should have stayed home like a good citizen, and let the local Kenosha politicians and Reason-brand Libertarian media cheer on the peoples'/pedophiles' socialist revolutionary dumpster fire. Rather than trying to extinguish it.
Those who hoped the second Trump Administration would reject big spending, war, and restrictions on liberty continue to be disappointed. A new disappointment came when Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem announced her department would in May begin enforcing the REAL ID law.
-Ron Paul
http://www.ronpaullibertyreport.com/archives/real-id-phony-security-real-authoritarianism
My recollection of getting my Real ID driver's license was that I had to bring a birth certificate with me to get the Real ID. I could just renew without the BC but that would not be a Real ID license. Now I agree the Real ID is probably not necessary, but I fail to see how those that insist on birth certificates for voter registration can object to the Real ID.
I had to bring the same BC I used to get my original license 27 years ago. Only difference was they also needed my car registration (which I needed to show my non-compliant DL to get) in order to verify my address.
Probably would have got one earlier but I heard it was racist to have valid ID.
Well, on the bright side, we won’t have to fly with POCs anymore. I mean, if they can’t get a regular ID card…..
I have no need for a real ID card. As I have a VA ID card that meets all the requirements for domestic travel.
Then . . . you're kinda dumb.
Good response. How long you think before coming up with this?
I had a Real ID in VA. Moved to PA, showed passport, birth certificate, ssn, PA game me a regular ID. I use the passport to fly anyway.
Is this the game where the Gov't pretends they don't already have detailed records on every US Citizen? And then we pretend that we don't know that they are pretending?
Fun Game.
And we pretend that there's any "data security" protecting that info?
And if the government doesn't actually have a detailed record, they can just buy one from a number of private vendors that track people on the internet.
It was a bit spooky: I renewed my REAL ID drivers license a few months ago and when I finished, the clerk said, "Thank you for your service."
Evidently, my veterans status is somehow connected to REAL ID.
FWIW, I haven't served in the military in almost 30 years.
On the plus side, there goes any excuse whatsoever not to provide ID at the voting booth.
So provide the same documents as when I got my DL last time. Got it.
Gosh! Who could ever have guessed that Federal bureaucrats would EVER try to sneak a power grab past The People disguised as a fake benefit?
And it's long past time to shut down the TSA too.
I’d like to know how many security threats to domestic travel have occurred in the last 20 years that would have been prevented by REAL ID.
It rhymes with hero.
But, like the TSA, (un)Real-id has the wonderful attribute of allowing the politicians to say that "they did something!" (regardless how pointless, unAmerican, unconstitutional and just plain morally wrong that thing is).
If what we want is theater - just replace TSA with a troupe of second rate actors who can put on 24/7 Shakespeare plays in every airport. It would also be useless, but somehow still a better use of the money.
It might at least be diverting when your plane is diverted.
If Real ID stops the people who wear pajamas in public from flying, bring it on.
DUH. It's what God's Own Prohibitionists in Congress were doing while the Orangopox diddled with tariffs so cronies could do insider info stock transactions to finance their campaigns. Reporters helpfully bobbled about like headless chickens. With opponents like the commie dems, and with GOP infiltraitors backstabbing the libertarian candidate, how could the mystical looters do anyghing BUT win elections?